Azerbaijan

Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

As in previous years, voted UNGA Resolution 65/48 in December 2010

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Attended as an observer the Tenth Meeting of States Parties in December 2010

Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. It has stated that it supports the goals of the treaty, including a comprehensive ban. But, it “cannot accede to the Ottawa Convention without settlement of the armed conflict, restoration of territorial integrity of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and having a threat of hostility resumption, even though Azerbaijan stopped planting of additional mines.… Therefore adherence to the Ottawa Convention will be possible only after the final settlement of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.”[1] In 2010, it stated that “de jure, not signing it, de facto, Azerbaijan is fulfilling all the obligations prescribed by the Ottawa Convention, and not only no worse, but perhaps even better than many countries which have signed and ratified it.” However, Azerbaijan “has no objective possibility to become a full member of the Ottawa Convention.”[2]

Still, Azerbaijan has demonstrated support for the treaty.  It has voted in favor of the annual UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution promoting universalization of the treaty every year since 2005, including Resolution 65/48 on antipersonnel mines on 8 December 2010. Azerbaijan submitted voluntary Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reports in 2008 and 2009.  While the reports have details about mine clearance, victim assistance, and mine risk education, they do not include any information on Azerbaijan’s stockpiled antipersonnel mines. 

Azerbaijan is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and use

Azerbaijan has stated on several occasions that it does not produce or export antipersonnel mines.[3] Azerbaijan’s mine stockpile is a legacy of the Soviet era, but the number and types of mines held are not known.

In early 2011, Azerbaijani Defense Industry Minister Yaver Jamalov informed President Ilham Aliyev about the reconstruction of the “Sanayecihaz” Scientific-Production Center, which will produce new defense goods including, apparently, antipersonnel mines. President Aliyev visited the reconstructed facility and put it in operation.[4]Following this media report, the ICBL sent a letter in March to the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs to request urgent clarification in this regard. Despite continuous follow-up on the letter, as of 4 September the ICBL has received no response.

Additionally, in 2010, a communiqué posted on the website of the Ministry of Defense Industry suggested that the production of antipersonnel mines had begun at a newly opened weapons production facility, but the reference to antipersonnel mines was later removed. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs attributed the incident to an “accidental technical error.”[5] The director of the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) also denied that Azerbaijan had started producing antipersonnel mines.[6]

Officials have stated that Azerbaijan has not used antipersonnel mines since the end of open conflict with Armenia in 1994.  They have also said that while Azerbaijan does not intend to use antipersonnel mines in the future, it does not rule out the possibility.[7] Azerbaijan apparently has not taken any specific legal measures to prohibit production, trade, or use of antipersonnel mines.

 



[1] Mine Ban Treaty voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.

[2] Statement of Azerbaijan, Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 29 November 2010.

[3] See, for example, voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.  In June 2005, Azerbaijan said that it is “unilaterally committed to non producing and non accumulating” of antipersonnel mines. Statement of Azerbaijan, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 13 June 2005.

[4] “Azerbaijan Defense Industry Ministry’s ‘Sanayecihaz’ Scientific-Production Center produces five new defense goods in 2011,” Azeri Press Agency, 3 March 2011, en.apa.az.

[5] Response to ICBL letter by Garay Muradov, Head of Security Affairs Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 21 July 2010.

[6] Interview with Nazim Ismailov, Director, ANAMA, in Geneva, 1 December 2010.

[7] See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 844. See also, voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.


Last Updated: 24 August 2011

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Government officials have been more open to discussing the convention in the past two years, but have stated that Azerbaijan will not join the convention until the conflict with Armenia is settled, including the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

In August 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that the government “supports” the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but cannot join “at this stage” because of the “ongoing occupation” of Nagorno-Karabakh and “seven areas adjoining regions” of Azerbaijan by Armenia.[1]

In November 2010, the director of the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA), said that the Armenia-continued occupation of parts of Azerbaijan as well as Nagorno-Karabakh means it is not possible for Azerbaijan to join the convention at this time.[2]

Azerbaijan participated in some of the Oslo Process meetings that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but did not attend the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008.[3] It has not attended any regional or international meetings held on cluster munitions since 2008.

On 2 August 2010, the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) convened a roundtable event in Baku to celebrate the Convention on Cluster Munitions’ entry into force, which included a short film screening and dissemination of the text of the convention as translated by the campaign into Azerbaijani.[4]

Azerbaijan is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty or the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Azerbaijan is not known to have produced or exported cluster munitions. It inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions from the Soviet Union. Jane’s Information Group reports that RBK-250, RBK-250/275, and RBK-500 cluster bombs are in service with the country’s air force.[5] RBK-250 bombs with PTAB submunitions were among the abandoned Soviet-era ammunition stockpiles located near the village of Saloglu in the northwestern part of the country.[6] Azerbaijan also possesses Grad 122mm and Smerch 300mm surface-to-surface rockets, but it is not known if these include versions with submunition payloads.[7]

Cluster Munition Remnants

Azerbaijan is affected by cluster munition remnants. In 2007, the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines conducted a survey of cluster munition contamination in the non-occupied border regions of Azerbaijan. It concluded that cluster munitions had been used in Aghdam, Aghdara, and Fizuli districts/regions.[8]

Significant contamination from cluster munition remnants has also been identified in Nagorno-Karabakh (see the profile for Nagorno-Karabakh).[9] In 2006 and 2007, cluster munition remnants were found in and around warehouses at a former Soviet ammunition storage area (ASA) located at Saloglu in Agstafa district. None have since been encountered (see below section, Clearance of cluster munition contaminated area).

Clearance of cluster munition contaminated area

No cluster munition remnants were cleared in 2010.[10] In 2006, at Saloglu, 16 “9M 27 K” cluster munition rockets were destroyed (each rocket has 24 submunitions). In 2007, 181 “Z-O-13” cluster munition artillery shells were destroyed (each item has eight submunitions). In 2008–2010, no cluster munition remnants were found at Saloglu.[11]

 



[1] Statement by Elchin Huseynli, Arms Control Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Baku, 2 August 2010. The AzCBL organized this roundtable meeting on the mine and cluster munitions problem in Azerbaijan and globally; “Azerbaijan not join the UN Convention on the prohibition of cluster munitions,” Zerkalo (newspaper) www.zerkalo.az, 3 August 2010; and letter No. 115/10/L from Amb. Murad N. Najafbayli, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the UN in Geneva, to the CMC, 10 May 2010.

[2] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, Director, ANAMA, Baku, 18 November 2010.

[3] For details on Azerbaijan’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 188.

[4] Participants included government officials, diplomatic representatives, ICRC, UNDP, NGO members, mine survivors and local media. CMC, “Entry into force of the Convention on Cluster Munitions Report: 1 August 2010,” November 2010, p. 12.

[5] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 835.

[6] Human Rights Watch visit to Saloglu, May 2005.

[7] International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2011 (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 88; and Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2008).

[8] Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines, “Information Bulletin,” January 2008.

[9] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, Director, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010; see also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice, Mines Action Canada, May 2009, p. 188.

[10] Email from Tural Mammadzada, Operations Officer, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[11] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10; and email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.


Last Updated: 09 August 2011

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines

Azerbaijan is contaminated by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), primarily as a result of armed conflict with Armenia in 1988–1994. A general survey of contamination was undertaken in 2001, followed by a Landmine Impact Survey (LIS) in 18 districts carried out from September 2002 to June 2003. The LIS identified 480 mine-impacted communities and 163 ERW-impacted communities in 18 districts. In total, 970 suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) covering 736km2 of land were found to be affecting 514,000 people.[1]

In late 2006, the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) significantly reduced the overall estimate of contamination to 306km2, based on a survey conducted with the support of local authorities of the 11 most heavily mine/ERW-affected districts.[2] This revised figure included areas not identified by the LIS. New SHAs have since been identified by re-survey by ANAMA, but land release had reduced the overall SHA to approximately 155km2 as of the end of 2010.[3]

The precise extent of the mine/ERW problem in areas of Azerbaijan occupied by Armenia is unknown. In addition to Nagorno-Karabakh (see Nagorno-Karabakh profile), which was occupied by Armenian forces during the conflict between the two countries, the districts of Gubadly, Jabrayil, Kelbajar, Lachin, and Zangilan, as well as parts of Aghdam, Fizuli, and Terter, are under the control of Armenian forces.[4] These areas are believed to have extensive mine/ERW contamination estimated to cover hundreds of square kilometers.[5]

Cluster munition remnants

Azerbaijan is affected by cluster munition remnants. In 2007, the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) conducted a survey of cluster munition contamination in the non-occupied border regions of Azerbaijan. It concluded that cluster munitions had been used in Aghdam, Aghdara, and Fizuli districts/regions.[6]

Significant contamination from cluster munition remnants has also been identified in Nagorno-Karabakh (see Nagorno-Karabakh profile).[7] In 2006 and 2007, cluster munition remnants were found in and around warehouses at a former Soviet ammunition storage area (ASA) located at Saloglu in Agstafa district. None have since been encountered (see below section, Clearance of cluster munition contaminated area in 2010).

Other explosive remnants of war

There are also other areas confirmed or suspected to contain ERW, including both unexploded ordnance (UXO) and abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO). Despite ongoing clearance efforts, significant contamination remains in and around warehouses at the former Soviet ASA at Saloglu and in Guzdek village in Garadakh district, a 20-minute drive from the capital, Baku. The ASA at Saloglu, which consisted of 138 bunkers, was the largest Soviet warehouse in the south Caucasus. In 1991, when Azerbaijan gained independence, the warehouse was blown up by the departing Soviet army.[8] Since the explosion, which scattered stored munitions, 152 incidents have reportedly killed 32 people and injured 91 others.[9]

Also in 1991, 20 warehouses were blown up in Guzdek village resulting in tens of thousands of items of ordnance being scattered over a large area. There is evidence that the perimeter surrounding the area was mined as mine incidents since then are reported to have killed two people and injured two others.[10]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2011

National Mine Action Authority/Mine action center

ANAMA

International demining operators

None

National demining operators

ANAMA, Dayag, IEPF

International risk education (RE) operators

None

National RE operators

ANAMA

ANAMA was established in 1998 as the national entity mandated to oversee all mine action activities in Azerbaijan under the supervision of the State Commission for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. A Joint Working Group, established in December 1999 to improve coordination among ministries and state bodies on a bilateral basis, has met only three times in 10 years. UNDP has claimed that ANAMA may try to reorganize the Joint Working Group by changing its membership.[11]

ANAMA has its headquarters in Baku, a regional office in Fizuli, a Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center in Goygol, and three operational centers: in Agjabedi, Agstafa, and Terter. At the end of 2010, ANAMA had 404 employees of whom 253 were operational staff as well as 32 mine detection dogs (MDDs) and six demining machines. Its operating partners to conduct clearance operations are two national NGOs: Dayag (Relief Azerbaijan) and the International Eurasia Press Fund (IEPF). The two NGOS have a combined staff of 158.[12]

Two strategic plans are being pursued by the mine action program. The first is a medium-term plan to release all of the 306km2 of SHAs in accessible areas by the end of 2013.[13] It appears that the program will not meet this deadline based on current trends. As noted above, as of the end of 2010, 155km2 remained to be released from this total. In 2011, ANAMA planned to release approximately 27km2.[14] By the end of April it had already achieved one-third of its target.[15]

The second strategic plan is a longer term strategy by which ANAMA plans to increase its operational and management capacity to enable it to address the mine and ERW threat from the occupied areas once they are returned to Azerbaijan.[16] At a news conference in Baku on 11 November 2010, ANAMA’s director, Nazim Ismayilov, said once the Azerbaijani territories now under Armenian occupation are returned to Azerbaijan it could take 10 years to clear the area of mines.[17]

In a new strategic direction, ANAMA has begun to offer training to other mine action programs in the region. Following a June 2009 UNDP feasibility study that concluded that an international mine action center in Azerbaijan could benefit programs from Croatia to Tajikistan, in 2010 ANAMA opened a training center in Goygol region, 360km west of Baku. Among other training and support activities, mine action personnel from Georgia, Tajikistan, and Turkey were trained in demining techniques, information management, explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), and quality assurance (QA).[18]

Land Release

ANAMA has embraced a land release approach. A new standing operating procedure for land release adopted in July 2009 requires survey teams to conduct a physical spot check of at least 10% of the SHA.[19] According to the new system, land is classified to three categories depending on the threat level: low, medium, or high. Each threat level now has its own clearance methodology, using either one or a combination of demining tools.[20]

In 2010, Azerbaijan released 29.72km2 of which 7.44km2 was through clearance and the remaining 22.28km2 was canceled or released by survey.[21] Since 2008, Azerbaijan has canceled or released a total of more than 90km2: an annual average of some 30km2. In January–April 2011, Azerbaijan released a further 8.98km2 of contaminated area through mine and battle area clearance (BAC) (3.19km2) and survey (5.79km2).[22]

Five-year summary of land release[23]

Year

Mined area cleared (km2)

Battle area cleared (km2)

2010

1.26

6.18

2009

1.67

10.21

2008

1.46

3.11

2007

2.12

4.11

2006

2.07

5.47

Total

8.58

29.08

Survey in 2010

ANAMA conducts surveys with the Resurvey Team from its Training, Survey and Quality Assurance Division (TSQAD) and technical survey teams from ANAMA, IEPF and Dayag.[24] ANAMA non-technical survey teams in 2010 canceled 16.58km2 of SHAs while technical surveys from ANAMA, Dayag, and IEPF released a further 5.7km2.

Survey in 2010[25]

Operator

Area canceled by non-technical survey (m2)

Area released by technical survey (m2)

Total area released by survey

ANAMA

16,581,411

4,170,148

20,751,559

IEPF

0

795,879

795,879

Dayag

0

736,100

736,100

Total

16,581,411

5,702,127

22,283,538

Mine clearance in 2010

In 2010, Azerbaijan cleared more than 1.25km2 of mined areas, with the destruction of just 28 antipersonnel mines, suggesting a very low density of contamination in the remaining areas (see table below). IEPF conducted clearance in Gorandoy, Goygol, and Terter regions, while Dayag conducted clearance in Aghdam region.[26] In 2009, 1.67km2 of mined area was cleared.

As of the end of 2010, total mine clearance capacity consisted of three manual demining teams each with 38 personnel, six demining machines, and 32 MDDs and their handlers, the same as in 2009.[27]

Mine clearance in 2010[28]

Operator

Mined area cleared (m2)

No. of antipersonnel mines destroyed*

No. of antivehicle mines destroyed*

No. of UXO destroyed during mine clearance

ANAMA

52,465

18

81

28

Dayag

505,870

8

40

29

IEPF

699,659

2

21

15

Total

1,257,994

28

142

72

* As set out below a further 19 antipersonnel mines and 22 antivehicle mines were destroyed during BAC and EOD operations in 2010.

Clearance of cluster munition contaminated area in 2010

No cluster munition remnants were cleared in 2010.[29] In 2006, at Saloglu, 16 “9M 27 K” cluster munition rockets were destroyed (each rocket has 24 submunitions). In 2007, 181 “Z-O-13” cluster munition artillery shells were destroyed (each item has eight submunitions). In 2008–2010, no cluster munition remnants were found at Saloglu.[30]

Battle area clearance and explosive ordnance disposal in 2010

On 1 April 2009, the third phase of the “Clearance of UXO in Saloglu project” started. The project is being conducted with the NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund and the NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency. Subsurface clearance in 2010 cleared 656,192m2 of contaminated land, finding and destroying 55,271 items of UXO. At the end of 2010, 94% of the contaminated area had been cleared. Within this cleared area 95% of the UXO found in Azerbaijan has been found in Saloglu.[31]

On 10 June 2009, ANAMA began clearance of the abandoned ASA in Guzdek village.[32] Through 31 December 2010, ANAMA’s Special Operations Team (created specifically for the Guzdek clearance project) had cleared 1,430,858m2 of land, destroying in the process 42 antipersonnel mines, six antivehicle mines, and 9,018 items of ERW, including nine antipersonnel mines, six antivehicle mines, and 5,790 items of ERW while clearing 94,605m2 in 2010.[33]

Battle area clearance in 2010[34]

Operator

Battle area cleared (m2)

No. of UXO destroyed

No. of AXO destroyed

ANAMA

4,846,142

3,111

61,061

IEPF

4,000

2

0

Dayag

574,938

32

0

Total

5,425,080

3,145

61,061

Roving clearance/EOD call-outs in 2010

ANAMA’s Emergency Response Operations based in Fizuli, Aghdam, Terter, Guzdek and Agstafa are tasked with EOD after receiving requests from state, non-state, and regional authorities. The variety of locations where UXO have been found illustrates the wide coverage. In 2010, EOD teams completed 31 tasks including clearing UXO at a fruit juice factory in Beylaqan; on the grounds of a milk factory in Agstafa; at oil refineries near Baku; at the base of a television tower near Baku; in villages in Terter and Fizuli; and residences.[35] In total, during 2010 the Emergency Response Teams destroyed 2,509 items of UXO, 10 antipersonnel mines, and six antivehicle mines.

Quality management

Internal quality assurance (QA) is carried out by the team engaged in clearance while external QA is the sole responsibility of ANAMA’s TSQAD. This consists of the division head, one Sampling QA/QC Team (one team leader, one section leader, six deminers, and two drivers) with MDDs and handlers where needed. Quality control (QC) is conducted immediately after clearance is completed, through sampling in accordance with International Mine Action Standards.[36] Given this capacity, ANAMA has now stopped using the “exchange method” in which one demining team was used to conduct external QA/QC of an area cleared by another team.[37]

A total of 212 monitoring missions were conducted during 2010 compared to 189 in 2009.[38] Based on the Clearance Completion Reports, external QC checks were conducted by the TSQAD on 31 sites (2.6km2) of which 15 were minefields (0.3km2) and 16 battle areas (2.3km2). Most of the QC checks were implemented by the Sampling Team consisting of 10 deminers and two MDD groups.[39]

Safety of demining personnel

No injuries occurred to demining personnel in 2010.[40]

Other Risk Reduction Measures

In 2010, mine/ERW risk education (RE) activities were implemented by ANAMA’s risk education department officers, ANAMA’s clearance groups (when conditions do not allow them to engage in demining), and ANAMA’s two NGO implementing partners: Dayag and IEPF. Since 2004, when a memorandum of understanding was signed between ANAMA and the Ministry of Education on integrating RE into the school curriculum, each year 52,000 secondary school students in 1,200 schools have attended RE classes.[41]

 



[1] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 7.

[2] Telephone interview with Murad Rahimov, Information Manager, Information Department, ANAMA, 10 June 2010.

[3] The calculation of this remaining area at 155km2 is based on subtracting the 151km2 reportedly released through 31 December 2010 from the 306km2 estimated to be contaminated in late 2006. ANAMA, “2011 Work Plan,” p. 9, www.anama.gov.az.

[4] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 7.

[5] “Anti-mine actions in occupied lands to take some 10 years,” Azerbaijan News, Baku, 13 November 2010, www.news.az.

[6] AzCBL, “Information Bulletin,” January 2008.

[7] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, Director, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010; see also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice, Mines Action Canada, May 2009, p. 188.

[8] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 20.

[9] Interview with Murad Rahimov, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010 and ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 21.

[10] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 23.

[11] UNMAT, “Portfolio of Mine Action Projects 2011,” March 2011, New York, p. 38.

[12] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 12.

[13] Interview with Nigar Azimova, ANAMA, Baku, 30 April 2010.

[14] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 7.

[15] ANAMA, “April Monthly Report 2011,” www.anama.gov.az.

[16] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010.

[17] T. Hajiyev, “Foreign companies may be involved in cleaning of occupied Azerbaijani territories from mines,” Trend News Agency (Baku), 11 November 2010, en.trend.az.

[18] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 20.

[19] Interview with Tural Mammadov, Operations Officer, ANAMA, Baku, 29 April 2010.

[20] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 16.

[21] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[22] ANAMA, “April Monthly Report 2011”.

[23] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[24] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 7; and email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[25] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[26] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 14.

[27] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 10.

[28] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[29] Ibid.

[30] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10; and email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[31] ANAMA. “Saloglu Project,” undated, www.anama.gov.az.

[32] ANAMA, “ANAMA conducts clearance operations in Guzdek settlement,” 15 June 2009, www.anama.baku.az.

[33] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 10; and “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 23.

[34] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[35] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, pp. 14–15.

[36] Interview with Elnur Gasimov, TSQAD Leader, Goygol Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center, ANAMA, Goygol, 12 April 2010.

[37] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Elnur Gasimov, ANAMA, 19 June 2009.

[38] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 16; and “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 17.

[39] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 17.

[40] Email from Tural Mammadov, ANAMA, Baku, 6 May 2011.

[41] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 30.


Last Updated: 21 October 2011

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2010

2,365 mine/ERW casualties (364 killed; 2,001 injured)

Casualties in 2010

5 (2009: 22)

2010 casualties by outcome

1 killed; 4 injured (2009: 4 killed; 18 injured)

2010 casualties by device type

3 antipersonnel mines; 2 antivehicle mines

In 2010 the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) registered five mine casualties in four incidents: two civilians injured by antivehicle mines and two soldiers injured and one soldier killed by antipersonnel mines. All casualties were male. No deminer casualties were identified for 2010.[1] The 2010 data represented a decrease from the 22 casualties identified by ANAMA in 2009.[2]

The Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) identified 13 casualties in 2010, including the five recorded by ANAMA.[3] This also represented a decrease from the 34 casualties AzCBL reported for 2009. [4]

Variation in annual casualty data reported by key actors is due to differing collection methodologies. ANAMA collects casualty data through a network of district representatives and from media reports. Only incidents that occur in mine/ERW hazard areas and can be verified are recorded in the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA). AzCBL gathers information in all affected districts—except the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic—from its regional coordinators, civil and military hospitals, and rehabilitation centers as well as from the local media.[5]

Online media reported two additional unverified military mine casualties (one killed; one injured) on the Nagorno Karabakh cease-fire line.[6]

ANAMA reported a total of 2,365 mine/ERW casualties (364 killed; 2,001 injured) in Azerbaijan from the early 1990s to the end of 2010.[7]

Victim Assistance

In 2010, there were at least 1,843 mine/ERW survivors known to be living in Azerbaijan.[8] Chirag Humanitarian Development Public Union carried out a medical needs assessment for survivors during a seven-month period from the beginning of 2010. As a result, 110 mine/ERW survivors from 23 regions received medical services.[9] Survivors identified as needing wheelchairs received assistance from ANAMA.[10]

Victim assistance coordination[11]

Government coordinating body/focal point

ANAMA

Coordinating mechanism

Mine Victim Assistance (MVA) Working Group, led by ANAMA including national NGOs, the Azerbaijan Red Crescent Society (AzRCS), and other relevant organizations

Plan

MVA Strategy of the Azerbaijan Mine Action Program

The Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Population (MLSPP) and the Ministry of Health are responsible for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities more generally.[12]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities in 2010[13]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2010

MLSPP

Government

Rehabilitation and prostheses

Rehabilitation center in Ganja doubled prosthetics production for survivors from 2009, the other 2 centers which reported maintained similar output

Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic in Baku/MLSPP

Government

Rehabilitation, diagnostic, and psychosocial support

Decrease in the overall number of survivors assisted from 2009, but slightly more survivors received services for the first time

AzRCS

National NGO

Social support to families of mine casualties in Aghstafa and Qazakh regions

Increased beneficiaries from 1 family to 13 families receiving support in 2 districts

AzCBL

National NGO

Economic inclusion: micro-finance projects; legal awareness for mine/ERW survivors and families in Terter and Fizuli regions

Program continued and all micro-finance recipients had repaid loans by August 2010

ANAMA/Azerbaijan Mine Victim Association

Government/National NGOs

Provided services through national NGOs including micro-credit, wheelchairs, and equipment

Additional wheelchairs distributed to survivors in need; surgery for prosthetic replacement

 

Chirag Humanitarian Development Public Union /International Organization for Migration /International/ANAMA Trust Fund for Demining and Mine Victims Assistance (ITF)

National NGO/International organization

Micro-credit and small business training in six districts; medical examination and treatment

In a new project, 110 mine victims from 23 regions received full medical services; small business training and micro-credit project was extended

In 2010, the availability of economic inclusion and education services for mine/ERW survivors increased through local NGO projects with donor support.[14] Most existing victim assistance programs continued from the previous year. However, no significant changes in the quality of services were reported.[15] The overall situation of persons with disabilities was said to be improving due to government efforts and the growing economy.[16]

The government reported in 2010 that medical and rehabilitation services are free for Nagorno-Karabakh war invalids and mine/ERW survivors.[17] Also in 2010, regional centers on rehabilitation of persons with disabilities were opened in Naftalan, Yevlakh, and Khachmaz, making 14 regional rehabilitation centers in total.[18] National legislation prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities, but there was discrimination in employment and most buildings were not accessible.[19]

Azerbaijan ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol on 28 January 2009.

 



[1] Email from Imran Safaraliyev, Mine Victim Assistance Officer, ANAMA, 7 February 2011; and ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” Baku, 2011, p. 7.

[2] ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), www.the-monitor.org.

[3] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, Director, AzCBL, 17 January 2011.

[4] ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), www.the-monitor.org.

[5] Ibid.

[6] See “More NKR cease-fire violations: At least two dead after latest fighting,” Armenia Now, 6 September 2011, www.armenianow.com. These casualties could not be verified and were not added to the annual total.

[7] ANAMA, “Monthly Report January 2011,” p. 3, www.anama.gov.az.

[8] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az. The total was calculated by ANAMA through victim assistance projects and cross checking of the casualty database, and includes the four survivors identified in 2010.

[9] Interviews with Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 28 February 2011.

[10] ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” Baku, 2011, p. 28.

[11] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az; and interview with Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 28 February 2011.

[12] Interview with Hadi Rajabli, Chairperson, Milli Majlis (Parliament) Commission on Social Policy, Baku, 25 March 2011.

[13] Interview with Fuzuli Alakbarov, Minister of Labor and Social Protection of Population, AzTV, Baku, 21 January 2010; interview with Seadet Mahmudova, Head Physician, Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic, Baku, 16 March 2011, interview with Hadi Rajabli, Parliament Commission on Social Policy, Baku, 25 March 2011; interview with Shamsaddin Hudaverdiyev, Head Doctor, Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 30 March 2011; telephone interview with Mubariz Rustamli, Head of Center, Nakhchivan Prosthetic and Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, 30 March 2011; interview with Ilham Bagirov, Director, Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 30 March 2011; “Ilham Aliyev attended the commissioning of a residential building for Karabakh war invalids and martyrs’ families,” 24 December 2010, president.az; telephone interviews with Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 04 April 2011 and 28 February 2011; ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” Baku, 2011, p. 28; ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” Baku, 2011, p. 28; email to AzCBL from Bayram Valiyev, Weapon Contamination Advisor, AzRCS, 11 March 2011; and ITF, “Annual Report 2010,” Ljubljana, 2011.

[14] Telephone interviews with Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 4 April 2011.

[15] Interviews with Seadet Mahmudova, Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic, Baku, 16 March 2011; and interviews with Shamsaddin Hudaverdiyev, Prosthetic Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center, Baku, 30 March 2011.

[16] Interview with Hadi Rajabli, Parliament Commission on Social Policy, Baku, 25 March 2011.

[17] Speech by Elnur Sultanov, Chief, International Cooperation Department, MLSPP, Khazar TV, 27 February 2010.

[18] “Ilham Aliyev attended the commissioning of a residential building for Karabakh war invalids and martyrs’ families,” 24 December 2010, president.az.

[19] US Department of State, “2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Azerbaijan,” Washington, DC, 8 April 2011.


Last Updated: 19 August 2011

Support for Mine Action

In 2009 and 2010 the government of Azerbaijan provided almost 80% of the country’s two-year mine action budget of US$21,451,921, one of the highest national contributions on a percentage basis for a mine-affected country.

The United States (US) and NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) provided the bulk of international funding. The NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund and the NATO NAMSA cleared unexploded ordnance in Saloglu.[1]

The International Center for Mine Action in Goygol region trained mine action personnel from Afghanistan, Georgia, Jordan, and Tajikistan on information management, designing evaluations, and provided 10,500 risk education booklets and 500 teaching manuals to Afghanistan.[2]

National contributions[3]

Year

Sector

Amount ($)

2010

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

8,997,993

2009

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

8,086,793

2008

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

6,312,500

2007

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

2,235,296

2006

Operations, clearance, risk education, victim assistance

1,241,379

Total

 

26,873,961

International contributions: 2010[4]

Donor

Sector

Amount ($)

United States

Clearance, victim assistance

893,000

NATO Partnership for Peace Fund and NAMSA

Clearance

985,760

UNDP

Clearance

282,167

South Korea

Victim assistance

30,000

Total

 

2,190,927

 

Summary of contributions: 2006–2010[5]

Year

National contributions ($)

International contributions ($)

Total contributions ($)

2010

8,997,993

2,190,927

11,188,920

2009

8,086,793

2,176,208

10,263,001

2008

6,312,500

1,723,262

8,035,762

2007

2,235,296

3,713,903

5,949,199

2006

1,241,379

4,530,961

5,772,340

 

 



[1] Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA), “Saloglu Project,” undated, www.anama.gov.az.

[2] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, pp. 29–30; and UNMAT, “Portfolio of Mine Action Projects 2011,” New York, March 2011, p. 38.

[3] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile:  Azerbaijan: Support for Mine Action,” www.the-monitor.org, 21 June 2010.

[4] International Trust Fund for Mine Victims Assistance (ITF), “Donors: Donations Overview: All, 2010, www.itf-fund.si; and ITF “Annual Report 2020, www.itf.fund.si; US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2011,” Washington DC, July 2011; and ANAMA, Annual Report 2011, “Contribution of Donors to the Mine Action Program in Azerbaijan (1999-2010).”

[5] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile:  Azerbaijan: Support for Mine Action,” www.the-monitor.org, 21 June 2010.