Azerbaijan

Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

As in previous years, voted UNGA Resolution 65/48 in December 2010

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Attended as an observer the Tenth Meeting of States Parties in December 2010

Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. It has stated that it supports the goals of the treaty, including a comprehensive ban. But, it “cannot accede to the Ottawa Convention without settlement of the armed conflict, restoration of territorial integrity of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and having a threat of hostility resumption, even though Azerbaijan stopped planting of additional mines.… Therefore adherence to the Ottawa Convention will be possible only after the final settlement of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.”[1] In 2010, it stated that “de jure, not signing it, de facto, Azerbaijan is fulfilling all the obligations prescribed by the Ottawa Convention, and not only no worse, but perhaps even better than many countries which have signed and ratified it.” However, Azerbaijan “has no objective possibility to become a full member of the Ottawa Convention.”[2]

Still, Azerbaijan has demonstrated support for the treaty.  It has voted in favor of the annual UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution promoting universalization of the treaty every year since 2005, including Resolution 65/48 on antipersonnel mines on 8 December 2010. Azerbaijan submitted voluntary Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reports in 2008 and 2009.  While the reports have details about mine clearance, victim assistance, and mine risk education, they do not include any information on Azerbaijan’s stockpiled antipersonnel mines. 

Azerbaijan is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and use

Azerbaijan has stated on several occasions that it does not produce or export antipersonnel mines.[3] Azerbaijan’s mine stockpile is a legacy of the Soviet era, but the number and types of mines held are not known.

In early 2011, Azerbaijani Defense Industry Minister Yaver Jamalov informed President Ilham Aliyev about the reconstruction of the “Sanayecihaz” Scientific-Production Center, which will produce new defense goods including, apparently, antipersonnel mines. President Aliyev visited the reconstructed facility and put it in operation.[4]Following this media report, the ICBL sent a letter in March to the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs to request urgent clarification in this regard. Despite continuous follow-up on the letter, as of 4 September the ICBL has received no response.

Additionally, in 2010, a communiqué posted on the website of the Ministry of Defense Industry suggested that the production of antipersonnel mines had begun at a newly opened weapons production facility, but the reference to antipersonnel mines was later removed. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs attributed the incident to an “accidental technical error.”[5] The director of the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) also denied that Azerbaijan had started producing antipersonnel mines.[6]

Officials have stated that Azerbaijan has not used antipersonnel mines since the end of open conflict with Armenia in 1994.  They have also said that while Azerbaijan does not intend to use antipersonnel mines in the future, it does not rule out the possibility.[7] Azerbaijan apparently has not taken any specific legal measures to prohibit production, trade, or use of antipersonnel mines.

 



[1] Mine Ban Treaty voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.

[2] Statement of Azerbaijan, Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 29 November 2010.

[3] See, for example, voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.  In June 2005, Azerbaijan said that it is “unilaterally committed to non producing and non accumulating” of antipersonnel mines. Statement of Azerbaijan, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 13 June 2005.

[4] “Azerbaijan Defense Industry Ministry’s ‘Sanayecihaz’ Scientific-Production Center produces five new defense goods in 2011,” Azeri Press Agency, 3 March 2011, en.apa.az.

[5] Response to ICBL letter by Garay Muradov, Head of Security Affairs Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 21 July 2010.

[6] Interview with Nazim Ismailov, Director, ANAMA, in Geneva, 1 December 2010.

[7] See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 844. See also, voluntary Article 7 Report (for the period June 2000–November 2008), Form A.


Last Updated: 20 August 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Republic of Azerbaijan has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Government officials have been more open to discussing the convention in recent years, but have stated that Azerbaijan will not join the convention until the conflict with Armenia is settled, including the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

For example, in 2010, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official said that the government supports the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but cannot join “at this stage” because of the “ongoing occupation” of Nagorno-Karabakh and “seven areas adjoining regions” of Azerbaijan by Armenia.[1]

Azerbaijan participated in some of the Oslo Process meetings that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but did not attend the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008.[2] It has not attended any regional or international meetings held on cluster munitions since 2008.

Azerbaijan is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty or the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Azerbaijan is not known to have produced or exported cluster munitions. It inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions from the Soviet Union. Jane’s Information Group reports that RBK-250, RBK-250/275, and RBK-500 cluster bombs are in service with the country’s air force.[3] Additionally, Azerbaijan received 12 Smerch 300mm unguided surface-to-surface launchers from the Ukraine in 2007-2008, but it is not known if these include rockets with submunition payloads.[4]

Azerbaijan ordered from Israel in 2005 and received in 2008-2009 a total of 50 Extra surface-to-surface missiles for its Lynx type launchers.[5] According to the product information sheet available from its manufacturer, the Extra missile can have either a unitary or submunition warhead.[6]  It is not know which variant was acquired.

RBK-250 bombs with PTAB submunitions were among the abandoned Soviet-era ammunition stockpiles located near the village of Saloglu in the northwestern part of the country.[7] Azerbaijan also possesses Grad 122mm and Smerch 300mm surface-to-surface rockets, but it is not known if these include versions with submunition payloads.[8]

 



[1] Statement by Elchin Huseynli, Arms Control Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Baku, 2 August 2010. The AzCBL organized this roundtable meeting on the mine and cluster munitions problem in Azerbaijan and globally; “Azerbaijan not join [sic] the UN Convention on the prohibition of cluster munitions,” Zerkalo (newspaper), www.zerkalo.az, 3 August 2010; and letter No. 115/10/L from Amb. Murad N. Najafbayli, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the UN in Geneva, to the CMC, 10 May 2010.

[2] For details on Azerbaijan’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 188.

[3] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 835.

[4] Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, “Arms Transfers Database,”  http://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers. Recipient report for Azerbaijan for the period 1950-2011, generated on 15 May 2012.

[5] Ibid. According to SIPRI, the Azerbaijani designation for the Lynx multiple rocket launchers are Dolu-1, Leysan and Shimsek.

[6] Israel Military Industries, “Product Information Sheet: Extra Extended Range Artillery,” p. 3, http://bit.ly/ILhxUl accessed 4 May 2012.

[7] Human Rights Watch visit to Saloglu, May 2005.

[8] International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2011 (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 88; and Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2008).


Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines

Azerbaijan is contaminated by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), primarily as a result of armed conflict with Armenia in 1988–1994. General surveys, a Landmine Impact Survey (LIS), re-surveys and clearance operations since 1998 reduced the area of contamination at the end of 2011 to approximately 125km2.[1] With additional land release in January–June 2012 Azerbaijan further reduced the estimated contaminated area on territory it controls to approximately 112km2.[2]

The precise extent of the mine/ERW problem in areas of Azerbaijan occupied by Armenia is unknown. In addition to Nagorno-Karabakh (see the Nagorno-Karabakh profile) which was occupied by Armenian forces during the conflict between the two countries, the districts of Gubadly, Jabrayil, Kelbajar, Lachin, and Zangilan, as well as parts of Aghdam, Fizuli, and Terter, are under the control of Armenian forces. These areas are believed to have extensive mine/ERW contamination estimated by the Azerbaijan National Agency of Mine Action (ANAMA) to potentially cover hundreds of square kilometers and contain tens of thousands of landmines.[3]

Cluster munition remnants

In 2007, the Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) conducted survey of cluster munition contamination in the non-occupied border regions of Azerbaijan. It concluded that cluster munitions had, among other things, been used in Aghdam and Fizuli regions.[4] Significant contamination from cluster munition remnants has been identified in Nagorno-Karabakh (see the Nagorno-Karabakh profile).[5]

In 2006 and 2007, cluster munition remnants were found in and around warehouses at a former Soviet ammunition storage area (ASA) located at Saloglu in Agstafa district, where clearance was completed in July 2011. None has since been encountered (see Clearance of cluster-munition-contaminated area in 2011 section below).

Other explosive remnants of war

There are also other areas confirmed or suspected to contain ERW, including both unexploded ordnance (UXO) and abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO). Despite ongoing clearance efforts, significant contamination remains in and around warehouses at the former Soviet ASA in Guzdek village in Garadakh district, close to the capital, Baku. In 1991, 20 warehouses were blown up in Guzdek village resulting in tens of thousands of items of ordnance being scattered over a large area.[6]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2012

National Mine Action Authority/Mine action center

Azerbaijan National Agency of Mine Action (ANAMA)

International demining operators

None

National demining operators

ANAMA, Relief Azerbaijan-Dayag, International Eurasia Press Fund (IEPF)

International risk education (RE) operators

None

National RE operators

ANAMA, Relief Azerbaijan-Dayag, IEPF, Ministry of Education, Community risk education committees

ANAMA was established in 1998 as the national entity mandated to oversee all mine action activities in Azerbaijan under the supervision of the State Commission for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation.[7] ANAMA has its headquarters in Baku, a regional office in Fizuli, a Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center in Goygol, and three operational centers in Agjabedi, Agstafa, and Terter. At the end of 2011, ANAMA had 602 employees (compared to 404 in 2010) of which 464 were operational staff (253 in 2010) as well as 36 mine detection dogs (MDDs) and six demining machines. Its operating partners in conducting clearance operations are two national NGOs: Dayag (Relief Azerbaijan) and the International Eurasia Press Fund (IEPF). The two NGOS have 76 deminers between them, the same number as in 2010.[8]

Two strategic plans are being pursued by the mine action program. The first is a medium-term plan to release all of the suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) identified in accessible areas by the end of 2013.[9] It appears that the program will not meet this deadline, based on current trends. As noted above, as of the end of 2011, 125km2 remained to be released from this total. In 2011, ANAMA released 26.31km2.[10] In 2012, ANAMA planned to release 28km2 through the use of its MDD and manual demining teams and also planned to conduct battle area clearance (BAC) and area cancelation through survey.[11] By the end of June it had released 12.47km2 of contaminated land, including 7.1km2 by means other than clearance.[12]

The second strategic plan is a longer term strategy by which ANAMA plans to increase its operational and management capacity to enable it to address the mine and ERW threat from the occupied areas once they are returned to Azerbaijan.[13] 

ANAMA and the national mine action program are strongly supported by the government of Azerbaijan. The government has assured financial sustainability through the inclusion of ANAMA since 2006 in the National Socio-economic Development Plan and the annual state budget. State support has increased from 10% to 90%, putting Azerbaijan in a small group of mine affected countries that are largely funded through the national budget.[14]

UNDP supports ANAMA in national mine action capacity building and planning that includes financial support from UNDP and the United Kingdom (UK).[15]

International support for mine action

In a new strategic direction, ANAMA has been offering training to other mine action programs in the region. Following a June 2009 UNDP feasibility study which concluded that an international mine action center in Azerbaijan could benefit programs from Croatia to Tajikistan, in 2010 ANAMA opened a training center in Goygol region, 360km west of Baku. Among other training and support activities, mine action personnel from Georgia, Tajikistan, and Turkey were trained in demining techniques, information management, explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), and quality assurance (QA).[16]

In 2011, ANAMA hosted representatives from the Ministries of Planning and Defence in Vietnam on ANAMA’s structures, surface and subsurface clearance operations and capacities including its international training and support programs at the Goygol regional center.[17] Also in 2011, ANAMA continued its support for risk education (RE) development in Afghanistan with funding from the government of Azerbaijan. In follow-up to two missions to Afghanistan in 2009 where ANAMA RE personnel conducted three trainings for 150 teachers in Kabul and Parvan provinces, ANAMA produced 15,000 textbooks and teaching manuals in preparation for the teaching of RE in Afghan schools.[18]

Land Release

In 2011, Azerbaijan released almost 29.5km2 of suspected land, of which some 13.5km2 was through mine clearance and BAC and the remaining 16km2 was canceled or released by survey.[19] Since 2008, Azerbaijan has canceled or released a total of more than 125km2, an annual average of some 30km2. In January–June 2012, Azerbaijan released a further 12.47km2 of contaminated area through mine clearance and BAC and survey.[20]

Five-year summary of land release[21]

Year

Mined area cleared (km2)

BAC (km2)

Area reduced or cancelled by survey (km2)

2011

3.29

10.18

15.98

2010

1.26

6.18

22.28

2009

1.67

10.21

19.71

2008

1.46

3.11

25.70

2007

2.12

4.11

12.22

Totals

9.80

33.79

95.89

Survey in 2011

ANAMA conducts surveys with the Resurvey Team from its Training, Survey and Quality Assurance Division (TSQAD) and with technical survey teams from ANAMA, IEPF and Dayag.[22] ANAMA non-technical survey (NTS) teams in 2011 canceled 14.52km2 of SHAs while technical surveys from ANAMA, Dayag, and IEPF released a further 1.46km2.

Since 2000, ANAMA has released 111.52km2 of contaminated area through technical and non-technical survey.[23]

Survey in 2011[24]

Year

Area canceled by NTS (km2)

Area released by technical survey (km2)

Total area released by survey (km2)

2011

14.52

1.46

15.98

Mine clearance in 2011

In 2011, Azerbaijan has reported clearing 3.29km2 of mined areas, with the destruction of 26 antipersonnel mines, 56 antivehicle mines, and 366 items of UXO.[25] However, this clearance has not been disaggregated by operator. In 2010, 1.26km2 of mined area was cleared. The increase from 2011 is said to be largely the result of more intensive use of mechanical demining assets.[26]

As of the end of 2011, mine clearance capacity consisted of three manual demining teams that each had 38 personnel, six demining machines, and 36 MDDs and their handlers, the same as in both 2010 and 2009.[27]

In April 2012, ANAMA began clearing mines and UXO at a former Soviet Army military testing and training area in Jeyranchel along the Azerbaijani-Georgian border. The Soviet Army used the area in 1955–1991. An ANAMA survey in 2009 found large quantities of unexploded tank projectiles and artillery shells, air-dropped bombs, and other types of UXO on the surface, covering 19km2. The ANAMA-NATO/NAMSA Partnership for Peace Trust Fund Project “Jeyranchel Clearance Project” is funded through NAMSA with support from the UK and the United States. The government of Azerbaijan is funding 50% of the €3 million project, which is scheduled to take 28 months to complete. In the first month of operations ANAMA cleared 400,403m2 and found 70 landmines and items of UXO.[28]

Since 1998 and through June 2012, Azerbaijan found and destroyed a total of 303 antipersonnel mines and 473 antivehicle mines, as well as 672,111 items of UXO.[29] This is a relatively small number of mines given the extent of clearance.

Clearance of cluster-munition-contaminated area in 2011

No cluster munition remnant was cleared in 2010 or 2011. In 2006, at Saloglu, 16 “9M 27 K” cluster munition rockets were destroyed (each rocket has 24 submunitions). In 2007, 181 “Z-O-13” cluster munition artillery shells were destroyed (each item has eight submunitions). In 2008–2011, no cluster munition remnants were found at Saloglu.[30]

Battle area clearance and explosive ordnance disposal in 2011

In 2011, ANAMA conducted a total of 10.18km2 of BAC. They did not report the quantity of UXO found.[31]

On 1 April 2009, the third phase of the “Clearance of UXO in Saloglu project” started. It ended in July 2011. The project was conducted with the NATO Partnership for Peace Trust Fund and the NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency. Over the course of the project, 5.68km2 of clearance was conducted and more than 640,000 items of UXO destroyed. Within this cleared area, 95% of the UXO found in Azerbaijan have been found in Saloglu.[32]

On 10 June 2009, ANAMA began clearance of abandoned small arms ammunition in Guzdek village.[33] Through 31 December 2011, ANAMA’s Special Operations Team (created specifically for the Guzdek clearance project) had cleared 1,511,919m2 of land, including 81,061m2 in 2011, destroying in the process 5,210 landmines and items of abandoned ordnance.[34]

In August 2011, at the request of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources, the Special Operations Team of ANAMA began clearing a battle area of approximately 2.7km2 in an area of mud volcanoes[35] in the Absheron region near Baku.[36]

Roving clearance/EOD call-outs in 2011

ANAMA’s Emergency Response Operations based in Aghdam, Agstafa, Fizuli, Guzdek and Terter are tasked with EOD after receiving requests from state, non-state, and regional authorities. In 2011, EOD teams removed mines in Aghdam, Barda, and Terter regions when mines surfaced after floods in the regions. ANAMA emergency teams also responded to requests from the local authorities and police to remove ordnance in 14 regions as well as Baku and nearby Sumgait. In Baku, the EOD teams found two antivehicle mines and two items of UXO, which were subsequently destroyed at ANAMA’s demolition site at Guzdek.[37]

Quality management

Internal quality assurance (QA) is carried out by the team engaged in clearance while external QA is the sole responsibility of ANAMA’s TSQAD. Quality control (QC) is conducted immediately after clearance is completed, through sampling in accordance with International Mine Action Standards.[38]

A total of 231 monitoring missions were conducted during 2011, compared to 189 in 2009 and 212 in 2010.[39] Based on the Clearance Completion Reports, external QC checks were conducted by the TSQAD on 51 sites (1.6km2) of which 31 were minefields (0.3km2) and 20 battle areas (1.3km2). Most of the QC checks were implemented by the Sampling Team consisting of 10 deminers and two MDD groups.[40]

Safety of demining personnel

No injuries occurred to demining personnel in 2011.[41]

Risk Education

In 2011, mine/ERW RE activities were implemented by ANAMA’s RE department officers, ANAMA’s clearance groups (when conditions do not allow them to engage in demining), and ANAMA’s two NGO implementing partners: Dayag and IEPF. Since 2004, when a memorandum of understanding was signed between ANAMA and the Ministry of Education on integrating RE into the school curriculum, each year 52,000 secondary school students in 1,200 schools have attended RE classes.[42]

A total of 134 mine RE volunteer committees have been formed in nine districts to facilitate discussion and awareness on the dangers of mines and ERW. From these informal meetings the communities have reported 16 landmines and 454 ERW for demolition by ANAMA.[43]

 



[1] The calculation of this remaining area at 125km2 is based on subtracting the 181km2 reportedly released through 31 December 2011 from the 306km2 estimated to be contaminated in late 2006. ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2012, p. 7.

[2] ANAMA, “Monthly Report, June 2012,” available at www.anama.gov.az.

[3] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2012, p. 7.

[4] AzCBL, “Information Bulletin,” January 2008.

[5] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, Director, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010; see also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice, Mines Action Canada, May 2009, p. 188.

[6] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 15.

[7] UNMAT, “Portfolio of Mine Action Projects 2011,” March 2011, New York, p. 38.

[8] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, pp. 10, 14.

[9] Interview with Nigar Azimova, ANAMA, Baku, 30 April 2010.

[10] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 16.

[11] Ibid., p. 34.

[12] ANAMA, “Monthly Report, June 2012.”

[13] Interview with Nazim Ismayilov, ANAMA, Baku, 2 April 2010.

[14] Charles Downs, “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership: Azerbaijan”, GICHD, Geneva, March 2012, p. 17; and ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 5. Only Angola, Chile, Croatia, Denmark, and Venezuela contribute a comparable percentage of the annual mine action budget from national sources.

[15] UNDP, “What we do: Current Projects: Further Strengthening and Expanding Mine Action Capacity in Azerbaijan,” http://www.un-az.org/undp/sehife.php?lang=eng&page=02020001.

[16] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 20.

[17] Ibid., p. 21.

[18] Ibid., p. 27.

[19] Ibid., p. 16.

[20] ANAMA, “Monthly Report, June 2012.”

[21] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 16; and Charles Downs, “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership: Azerbaijan”, Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, Geneva, March 2012.

[22] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 7; and email from Tural Mammadzada, Operations Officer, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[23] Charles Downs, “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership: Azerbaijan”, GICHD, Geneva, March 2012.ANAMA, “Monthly Report, June 2012,” available at www.anama.gov.az.

[24] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, pp. 10–11, 16;

[25] Ibid., and email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 12 July 2012.

[26] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 14.

[27] Ibid., p. 34.

[28] ANAMA, “May 2012, Newsletter.”

[29] ANAMA, “Monthly Report, June 2012.”

[30] Email from Tural Mammadzada, ANAMA, 6 May 2011.

[31] ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 16.

[32] ANAMA. “Saloglu Project,” undated, www.anama.gov.az.

[33] ANAMA, “ANAMA conducts clearance operations in Guzdek settlement,” 15 June 2009, www.anama.baku.az.

[34] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 23; and “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 10.

[35] Mud volcanoes are one of the visible signs of the presence of oil and gas reserves beneath land and sea in the Caspian region. They are channels for releasing pressurized gas and mineral water, sometimes with traces of oil, together with associated mud from great depths (8­12km) and depositing them on the surface of the earth where they form mounds ranging from 5 to 500 meters high. Mud volcanoes do not contain lava.

[36] ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 16.

[37] Ibid., pp. 14–15.

[38] Interview with Elnur Gasimov, TSQAD Leader, Goygol Regional Mine Action Resource and Training Center, ANAMA, Goygol, 12 April 2010.

[39] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2010,” 2009, p. 16; “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” 2010, p. 17; and “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 17

[40] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 17.

[41] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, Director, Azerbaijan Campaign Against Landmines, 9 July 2012.

[42] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, pp. 28–29.

[43] Ibid.


Last Updated: 17 October 2012

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2011

2,375 mine/ERW casualties (367 killed; 2,008 injured)

Casualties in 2011

10 (2010: 5)

2011 casualties by outcome

3 killed; 7 injured (2010: 1 killed; 4 injured)

2011 casualties by device type

4 antipersonnel mines; 4 antivehicle mines; 2 victim-activated IED

In 2011, the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) registered ten casualties in eight incidents. Six casualties were security forces and four were civilians: two soldiers were injured by antipersonnel mines; one soldier was killed and three others injured by antivehicle mines; among civilian casualties, one man was injured and another killed by antipersonnel mines; and a girl was killed and her mother injured by a suspected improvised explosive device. [1]

The 2011 data represented an increase from the five casualties identified in 2010[2] but remained lower than the 22 casualties identified by ANAMA in 2009.[3]

The Azerbaijan Campaign to Ban Landmines (AzCBL) identified 12 casualties in 2011.[4] In addition to the ten casualties recorded by ANAMA, AzCBL reported a man killed and a woman injured by explosive remnants of war (ERW).[5] In 2010, AzCBL reported 13 casualties.[6]

Variation in annual casualty data reported by key actors is due to differing collection methodologies. ANAMA collects casualty data through a network of district representatives and from media reports. Only incidents that occur in mine/ERW hazard areas and can be verified are recorded in the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA). AzCBL gathers information in all affected districts (except the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic) from its regional coordinators, civil and military hospitals, and rehabilitation centers as well as from the local media.[7]

ANAMA reported a total of 2,375 mine/ERW casualties (367 killed; 2,008 injured) in Azerbaijan from the early 1990s to the end of 2011.[8]

Victim Assistance

At least 1,843 mine/ERW survivors were known to be living in Azerbaijan in 2010 when data was cross-checked.[9]

Victim assistance coordination

ANAMA is the government focal point for victim assistance. Implementation of the Mine Victim Assistance (MVA) Strategy of the Azerbaijan Mine Action Program was coordinated through the MVA Working Group, led by ANAMA, which included national NGOs, the Azerbaijan Red Crescent Society (AzRCS), and other relevant organizations. [10]

The Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Population (MLSPP) and the Ministry of Health are responsible for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities more generally.[11]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

The MLSPP provided rehabilitation and prostheses through three regional rehabilitation centers and the Rehabilitation Center of Invalids of the Republic in Baku.

AzCBL supported mine/ERW survivors and families with economic inclusion through micro-finance projects and legal awareness. ANAMA and the Azerbaijan Mine Victim Association provided services and assistance through national NGOs including such things as micro-credit, wheelchairs, and other equipment. The Chirag Humanitarian Development Public Union with the International Organization for Migration provided medical examinations and treatment as well as micro-credit and small-business training through a regional project funded by the International Trust Fund Enhancing Human Security (ITF).[12]

Regional centers for the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities existed in 14 municipalities of Azerbaijan.[13]

National legislation prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities. Employment discrimination remained a problem. There were no laws mandating access to public or other buildings, information, or communications for persons with disabilities, and most buildings were not accessible.[14]

Azerbaijan ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and its Optional Protocol on 28 January 2009. Azerbaijan submitted initial reporting under Article 35 of the CRPD in 2011.[15]

 



[1] Email from Arzu Asadova, Information Assistant, ANAMA, 11 June 2012.

[2] Email from Imran Safaraliyev, Mine Victim Assistance Officer, ANAMA, 7 February 2011; and ANAMA “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2011,” Baku, 2011, p. 7.

[3] ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), www.the-monitor.org.

[4] Email from Hafiz Safikhanov, Director, AzCBL, 21 June 2012.

[5] Ibid., 10 July 2012.

[6] Ibid., 17 January 2011.

[7] ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), www.the-monitor.org.

[8] ANAMA,“Monthly Report January 2011,” p. 3, www.anama.gov.az; and email from Arzu Asadova, ANAMA, 11 June 2012.

[9] ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az. The total was calculated by ANAMA through victim assistance projects and cross-checking of the casualty database, and includes the four survivors identified in 2010.

[10] Interview with Imran Safaraliyev, ANAMA, 28 February 2011; and ANAMA, “Mine Victim Assistance, one of the pillars of the Humanitarian Mine Action,” www.anama.gov.az.

[11] Interview with Hadi Rajabli, Chairperson, Milli Majlis (Parliament) Commission on Social Policy, Baku, 25 March 2011.

[12] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Azerbaijan,” www.the-monitor.org, last updated, 21 October 2011; ITF, Annual Report 2011,” Ljubljana, 2012, pp. 71-72.

[13] Azerbaijan, “Initial report of the Republic of Azerbaijan about the implementation of the UN Convention On the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” p. 38 (CRPD/C/AZE/1 2011), www2.ohchr.org/SPdocs/CRPD/futuresession/CRPD.C.AZE.1.doc. 

[14] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Azerbaijan,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[15] Azerbaijan, “Initial report of the Republic of Azerbaijan about the implementation of the UN Convention On the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” (CRPD/C/AZE/1 2011), www2.ohchr.org/SPdocs/CRPD/futuresession/CRPD.C.AZE.1.doc. 


Last Updated: 19 September 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

The Government of Azerbaijan has increased its contribution to mine action every year since 2007. In 2007, the national contribution represented 38% of the budget; in 2011 government support represented 86% of the total mine action budget, which is one of the highest national contributions on a percentage basis for a mine-affected country.[1]

In 2011, the Government of Azerbaijan contributed $10.2 million to mine action through the Azerbaijan National Agency of Mine Action (ANAMA).[2]

The United States (US) and NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) funds were used to clear unexploded ordnance in Saloglu, which was completed in July 2011.[3]

International contributions in 2011[4]

Donor

Sector

Amount

Amount (US$)

NATO PfP Fund

Clearance

US$604,568

604,568

NAMSA

Clearance

US$358,015

358,015

US

Clearance

US$365,000

365,000

UNDP

Clearance

US$240,000

240,000

Australia

VA

A$50,000

51,660

South Korea

Clearance

US$30,000

30,000

Total

 

 

1,649,243

Summary of contributions in 2007–2011[5]

Year

National contributions (US$)

International contributions (US$)

2011

10,203,713

1,649,243

2010

8,997,993

2,190,927

2009

8,086,793

2,176,208

2008

6,312,500

1,723,262

2007

2,235,296

3,713,903

Totals

35,836,295

11,453,543

 

 

 



[1] In 2010 and 2011, national funding in Angola, Chile, Croatia, and Venezuela represented at least 80% of their respective mine action budget. Algeria, Iran, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam do not report government contributions despite the army in each of the countries being the main or sole mine clearance operator in major mine action programs.

[2] ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 5.

[3] ANAMA. “Saloglu Project,” undated, www.anama.gov.az.

[4] US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2011,” Washington, DC, July 2012; Response to Monitor questionnaire by Christine Pahlman, Mine Action Coordinator, AusAID, 24 April 2012; ITF Enhancing Human Security, “Donors: Korea;” and ANAMA, “Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action 2012,” 2011, p. 5.

[5] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Azerbaijan: Support for Mine Action,” www.the-monitor.org, 19 August 2011.