Denmark

Last Updated: 02 November 2011

Mine Ban Policy

Policy

The Kingdom of Denmark signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December 1997 and ratified it on 8 June 1998, becoming a State Party on 1 March 1999. No additional legal or administrative measures were deemed necessary for national implementation of the treaty beyond ratification.

Denmark submitted its 15th Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report in March 2011.

Denmark attended the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2011.

Denmark is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and its Amended Protocol II on landmines, and submitted its Article 13 report on 29 September 2011. Denmark is also party to the CCW Protocol V on explosive remnants of war.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and retention

Denmark has stated that production of antipersonnel mines ceased in the 1950s, and that it has never exported antipersonnel mines. The types and quantities produced have not been revealed.[1] Import of antipersonnel mines ceased in 1990.[2]

Stockpile destruction of 266,517 mines was completed in December 1999, well in advance of the treaty deadline of 1 March 2003. Denmark initially retained 4,991 mines for training and research, but this number was reduced to 2,091 in August 2000. In its Article 7 report submitted in 2011, Denmark reported that it retained 1,893 mines for training as of 31 March 2011.[3] These mines are used for “research and development by Danish Defence Research Establishment,” and for training in mine detection.[4]

Denmark’s Article 7 reports have not included the M18A1 Claymore mines and FFV013 Claymore-type mines previously acknowledged to be in stock. The Ministry of Defense stated that these mines have all been modified to command-detonated mode, and are now treated and used only as an “area defense weapon” by the Army (M18A1) and the Air Force (FFV013).[5]

 



[1] Letter from Michael Borg-Hansen, Counselor, Royal Danish Embassy, Washington, DC, 11 July 1996. 

[2] Written response from Maj. Per Lyse Rasmussen, Ministry of Defense, 25 March 1999.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for period 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011), Form D.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Telephone interview with Maj. P. Lyse Rasmussen, Ministry of Defense, 22 January 2001.


Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions

Convention on Cluster Munitions status

State Party

Stockpile destruction

Stockpile destruction scheduled to begin in 2012

Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings

Attended Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut in September 2011 and intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2012

Key developments

Submitted annual updated Article 7 report in April 2012

Policy

The Kingdom of Denmark signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008 and ratified on 12 February 2010. It was among the first 30 ratifications to trigger entry into force of the convention on 1 August 2010.[1]

Denmark has reported that “a review of existing Danish legislation has proven it unnecessary for Denmark to take national legal measures to implement” the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[2] According to Denmark, the 2009 parliamentary motion approving ratification of the convention states that the convention’s provisions can be upheld without changes to existing Danish laws, and that penal sanctions for violations of the convention are imposed under the Military Penal Code.[3] Denmark has also reported that its Defense Command has issued a letter providing instructions on immediate steps to be taken to implement the convention.[4]

Denmark submitted its annual updated Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report on 30 April 2012, covering calendar year 2011.[5]

Denmark participated in the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions and its position shifted significantly to the point that it was able to adopt the convention at the conclusion of the negotiations in Dublin in May 2008.[6] Denmark’s swift ratification of the convention and the early initiation of its stockpile destruction demonstrate its strong commitment to the convention.

Denmark continued to engage in the work of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2011 and the first half of 2012. At the convention’s Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011, Denmark again confirmed its intent to meet all its obligations under the convention and provided an update on its progress in stockpile destruction.[7]

Denmark participated in the convention’s intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2012, where it announced that destruction of its cluster munition stockpile would commence later in 2012, four years earlier than previously stated (see the Stockpile destruction section below). Denmark also emphasized that the Convention on Cluster Munitions is “the standard and the appropriate framework for addressing the humanitarian impact of cluster munitions” and appealed to all states not party to “abolish” cluster munitions and join the ban convention without delay.[8]

Interpretive issues

Denmark has not yet stated its views on several issues important to the interpretation and implementation of the convention, including the prohibition on transit and the prohibition on foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions.

Denmark’s ratification instrument provided the following statement on the prohibition on assistance with prohibited acts during joint military operations: “Article 21 contains a significant provision for States Parties to be allowed to cooperate with states not party to the Convention (interoperability). Regardless of the broad wording of the ban in Article 1, States Parties may continue to participate in military cooperation and operations with States not party to the Convention. However, this access is not unlimited, as a State Party is never allowed to develop or acquire cluster munitions or explicitly request support in the form of cluster munitions in a situation where the State Party has an exclusive control over the choice of the ammunition.”[9]

Denmark has reported that its Defense Command has issued instructions that stipulate “limitations on the possibilities to co-operate with nations who have not signed the convention.”[10]

Disinvestment

For several years Danish NGOs have been calling for Danish financial institutions to stop investing in companies that produce cluster munitions, and in 2009 a motion was submitted for a ban on investment in cluster munition production.[11]

In January 2010, the Danish government expressed its opposition to a prohibition on investment in cluster munition producing companies.[12] In September 2010, the Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs published a “Guide on Responsible Investment” based on the UN Principles for Responsible Investment that describes mandatory disinvestment as an “emergency solution.”[13] In December 2011, the Minister of Business and Growth said that in the period since the guide was published there had not been any further engagement by the government on disinvestment in cluster munition production.[14]

Denmark has reported that UN Principles for Responsible Investment and the Danish Guide on Responsible Investment “demand all investors to respect international norms and conventions” such as the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[15] As of September 2010, 24 Danish investors had signed the UN Principles for Responsible Investment.[16]

A June 2012 report by NGOs IKV Pax Christi and FairFin (formerly Netwerk Vlaanderen) praised four Danish financial institutions for their measures to ban investments in cluster munition producers.[17]

Convention on Conventional Weapons

Denmark is a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW). For several years, it staunchly supported a United States-led effort to conclude a new CCW protocol on cluster munitions. However, in September 2011, the newly elected coalition government led by the Social Democrats subsequently reversed Denmark’s position and stated its opposition to the proposed CCW protocol.[18]

In a November 2011 letter to the Cluster Munition Coalition, Minister for Foreign Affairs Villy Søvndal stated, “I have instructed the Danish delegation to the upcoming Fourth Review Conference not to accept the draft for an additional protocol currently on the table.” The minister cited the CMC’s “important and very well founded arguments” as helping lead the “reconsideration of the Danish position with regard to the draft text for an additional protocol on cluster munitions to the CCW.” At the same time, the minister emphasized that “a total failure of the Review Conference would not be in the interest of our common goal of a world free of this inhumane weapon” and said that “any eventual protocol should be a temporary measure supplementing and thus in no way contradicting the Convention on Cluster Munitions.”[19]

At the outset of the CCW’s Fourth Review Conference in Geneva in November 2011, Denmark said that as a State Party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions it “has already committed itself to the prohibition and elimination of cluster munitions that pose unacceptable harm to civilians” and urged all states to join the ban convention. Denmark described the Convention on Cluster Munitions as “one of the major humanitarian achievements in the last decade” and warned, “we cannot allow for this achievement to be rolled back by establishing a lower standard within another instrument.” Denmark said the chair’s draft text of the proposed CCW protocol “unfortunately, undermines rather than underpins the Convention on Cluster Munitions and we are, therefore, not in a position to support the draft as it stands.”[20]

During the negotiations, Denmark joined a group of states that opposed consensus on the conclusion of a CCW protocol based on the chair’s draft text. On the final day of the conference, Denmark was one of 50 states that issued a joint statement declaring that the text did not enjoy consensus and was unacceptable from a humanitarian standpoint.[21] The conference ended without adopting a protocol and with no proposals to continue negotiations in 2012, thus marking the end of the CCW’s work on cluster munitions.

After the conference concluded, Minister Søvndal expressed relief that the Convention on Cluster Munitions “was not compromised” by a new CCW protocol on cluster munitions and said that “humanitarian considerations” had “not been met by the former Danish line” on the draft protocol.[22]

Use, production, and transfer

Denmark is not known to have produced, used, or exported cluster munitions.

Stockpiling

In its Article 7 reports, Denmark has declared a stockpile of 42,020 cluster munitions of three types containing 2,440,940 submunitions: DM642 artillery projectiles, DM662 artillery projectiles, and MK20 Rockeye cluster bombs.

Cluster munitions stockpiled by Denmark (as of 31 December 2011)[23]

Type of munition

Quantity of munitions

Quantity of submunitions

DM642 artillery projectiles, each containing 63 dual purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) submunitions

27,000

1,701,000

DM662 Base Bleed (extended range) artillery projectiles, each containing 49 DPICM submunitions

15,000

735,000

MK20 Rockeye cluster bombs

20

4,940

 

42,020

2,440,940

Stockpile destruction

Under Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Denmark is required to declare and destroy all stockpiled cluster munitions under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but no later than 1 August 2018

Denmark’s Defense Command has issued instructions that existing stockpiles of cluster munitions cannot be used in military operations, must be separated from operational munitions in storage depots, and should be clearly marked for destruction. The Defense Command has also issued instructions that existing stockpiles of munitions cannot be transferred, except for “limited amounts of munitions to be used for training purposes” which “should be thoroughly documented.” [24]

In April 2012, Denmark announced that its stockpile destruction process is scheduled to begin in 2012, four years sooner than originally planned. According to Denmark, the contractor is finalizing the plan for physical destruction and the process is expected to be completed by the end of 2013.[25]

Previously, in September 2011, Denmark stated that it expected to begin the stockpile destruction in 2016 or possibly sooner, depending on the contractor’s capacity to handle the quantity of munitions.[26] In its April 2012 Article 7 report, Denmark stated an implementation plan for stockpile destruction would be finalized in 2012.[27]

In July 2012, Danish media reported that the cost of the stockpile destruction had been revised to a total of DKK17.7 million.[28] Previously, in 2009, Denmark estimated that destruction of the DM642 and DM662 cluster munitions would cost as much as DKK250 million (US$46.7 million).[29]

Retention

In a July 2012 media article, the Minister of Defense stated that Denmark intends to retain 3,600 submunitions for training.[30] A government official has confirmed that this number of submunitions will be retained and said the Ministry of Defense expects to use 180 submunitions per year to train clearance personnel.[31] In April 2012, Denmark stated that all retained submunitions will be separated from their cluster munition containers and so “cannot be used operationally anymore.”[32]

Previously, in November 2010, Denmark said it intended to retain 170 cluster munitions for training explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) personnel.[33]

In its Article 7 reports, Denmark stated that the types and quantities of retained cluster munitions were still “To Be Determined” and said the Defense Command was identifying cluster munitions to be retained for training and educational purposes of EOD personnel.[34] In April 2012, Denmark stated that while the process of identifying the precise number of cluster munitions necessary was still ongoing, “current indications are that the final number is expected to be significantly lower than initially announced.”[35]

 



[1] Denmark submitted a formal declaration with its ratification instrument stating that the convention did not apply to Denmark’s territories of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, but that it may, by unilateral declaration of the government, apply at a later date. This was done to respect the limited self-governance agreements with the territories, with the aim of removing the exemptions as soon as the local decision-making processes were completed. On 12 February 2010, the convention was extended to cover Greenland. Danish territorial control does not include the United States (US) Thule Air Base in Greenland. Meeting with Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Defense officials, Copenhagen, 25 March 2010.

[2] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[3] Folketinget (Danish Parliament), “B60 Proposal for a parliamentary resolution on Denmark’s adoption of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, signed on 4 December 2008 in Oslo,” 19 November 2009, www.ft.dk. The Arms Act prohibits, without permission from the Minister of Justice, the possession, acquisition, and transfer of grenades, bombs, mines, or similar devices. The Military Penal Code will allow punishment for the willful use of cluster munitions in armed conflicts. Use of cluster munitions outside of armed conflicts will be punishable under the military criminal law on breach of duty pursuant to the Military Penal Code.

[4] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2012; and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[5] Denmark submitted its initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report on 27 January 2011, for calendar year 2010.

[6] For more details on Denmark’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 68–71.

[7] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/statement_denmark.pdf.

[8] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/04/2012-CCM-Intersessionals-DENMARK-statement-on-destruction-and-retention.pdf.

[9] Folketinget, “B60 Proposal for a parliamentary resolution on Denmark’s adoption of the Convention on cluster munitions, signed on 4 December 2008 in Oslo,” 19 November 2009, www.ft.dk.

[10] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[11] The motion was referred to the Defense Committee, which produced a report in October 2009 stating that, under the terms of the convention, it would be prohibited under certain specified circumstances for the Danish government and municipalities to invest in companies producing cluster munitions. “Report submitted by the Defence Committee on Motion No. B173, Proposal for a parliamentary resolution on the prohibition of investment in production and trade of cluster munitions,” 2 October 2009.

[12] Parliamentary debate concerning question S 620, 13 January 2010. On 11 January 2010, the Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs stated that mandatory regulation of investment could limit voluntary engagement by investors and a ban on investment in cluster munitions producers could affect the ability of Danish companies to follow UN Principles for Responsible Investment and active ownership. Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs, “Clarifying questions from the Defence Committee regarding proposals for parliamentary resolution prohibiting investment, production and trade with cluster weapons (B 173),” 11 January 2010.

[13] “Vejledning om ansvarlige investeringer (Guide on Responsible Investments),” September 2010, forward by Brian Mikkelsen, Minister of Economics and Business Affairs, pp. 3–4, www.samfundsansvar.dk.

[14] Letter from Ole Sohn, Minister for Business and Growth, to Rune Saugmann, Chair, Denmark Against Landmines, 2 December 2011.

[15] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[16] “Vejledning om ansvarlige investeringer (Guide on Responsible Investments),” September 2010, forward by Brian Mikkelsen, pp. 3–4, www.samfundsansvar.dk.

[17] IKV Pax Christi and FairFin (formerly Netwerk Vlaanderen), “Worldwide Investments in Cluster Munitions: A shared responsibility,” June 2012, pp. 96, 109, 112, and 113. In the report, Danish pension fund ATP received the highest rating for its policy prohibiting investment in cluster munitions producers. ATP disinvested from companies producing the weapons in 2006 and has a publicly available exclusion list which it updates on its website each time an exclusion is implemented. Since 2005, the following companies were excluded due to their involvement in cluster munitions: Aerostar, Alliant Techsystems, BAE Systems, General Dynamics, GenCorp, Goodrich, Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin, Magellan Aerospace, Poongsan, Raytheon, Rheinmetall, Saab, and Thales. The report also praises Danske Bank, Laergernes Pensionskasse (Medical Doctors Pension Fund), and Nycredit for having in place policies which exclude investment in cluster munition producing companies. The report notes, however, that their policies do not extend to all of their banking activities and contain a number of exceptions.

[18] In 2008, Ambassador Bent Wigotski of Denmark chaired the CCW Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on cluster munitions.

[19] Letter from Villy Søvndal, Minister for Foreign Affairs, to Sylvie Brigot, Executive Director, ICBL-CMC, November 2011.

[20] Statement of Denmark, CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 15 November 2011, http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/60C877F8671446A8C12579570047F5F4/$file/4thRevCon_DENMARK.pdf.

[21] Joint Statement read by Costa Rica, on behalf of Afghanistan, Angola, Austria, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Holy See, Honduras, Iceland, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Senegal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe. CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 25 November 2011. List confirmed in email from Bantan Nugroho, Head of the CCW Implementation Support Unit, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs, 1 June 2012.

[22] “Danmark går imod USA i strid om klygebomber,” (“Denmark opposes the USA in violation of cluster bombs”) DR Nyheder, 27 November 2011, http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Politik/2011/11/27/065350.htm.

[23] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, 27 January 2011. In November 2009, Denmark reported stockpiling approximately 300 M26 cluster munitions, but did not include the munitions in the Article 7 report. In July 2011, a Danish official explained that the “M26 rockets were ordered, but were never delivered to Denmark before the contract were [sic] cancelled.” Email from Lt. Col. Jens Erik Mortensen, Ministry of Defense, 18 July 2011.

[24] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[25] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/04/2012-CCM-Intersessionals-DENMARK-statement-on-destruction-and-retention.pdf.

[26] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011.

[27] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2012.

[28] “Danmark destruerer sine klyngebomber,” (“Denmark destroys its cluster bombs”) DR Nyheder, 3 July 2012, http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2012/07/03/0703180338.htm.

[29] Folketinget, B60 Proposal for a parliamentary resolution on Denmarks adoption of the Convention on cluster munitions, signed on 4 December 2008 in Oslo, 19 November 2009. Average exchange rate for 2009: US$1=DKK5.6266. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 6 January 2011.

[30] “Danmark destruerer sine klyngebomber,” (“Denmark destroys its cluster bombs”) Nyheder, 3 July 2012, http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2012/07/03/0703180338.htm.

[31] Letter from Adam Ravnkilde, Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Rune Saugmann, Chairman of Denmark Against Landmines, 16 July 2012.

[32] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/04/2012-CCM-Intersessionals-DENMARK-statement-on-destruction-and-retention.pdf.

[33] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Meeting of States Parties, Vientiane, 9 November 2010. Notes by the CMC.

[34] Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2012; and Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.

[35] Statement of Denmark, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/04/2012-CCM-Intersessionals-DENMARK-statement-on-destruction-and-retention.pdf.


Last Updated: 15 November 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines

Denmark has been affected by antipersonnel mines left from World War II. In 1944, the entire Skallingen Peninsula in Jutland on the Danish west coast was mined with antipersonnel and antitank mines.[1] One minefield was remaining on the peninsula. In 1945–1947, large parts of the minefield were cleared, but due to significant difficulties with the clearance and quality control (QC) of mainly dune and salt marsh areas, a part of the mined area had been fenced and left uncleared.[2]

The affected area of the Skallingen Peninsula, as of entry into force of the Mine Ban Treaty for Denmark on 1 March 1999, comprised a total of 1.86km2, initially identified from German mine records as well as markings established by mine clearance teams in 1947. For operational purposes the suspected mined area was divided into three areas called 1, 2, and 3. The first two areas were cleared by contractors in 2006–2008, leaving Area 3 to be demined.[3]

Mine Action Program

The Ministry of Transport has been responsible for clearance activities on Skallingen. The project was organized under the Danish Coastal Authority, with the power to task and coordinate civil contractors and manage projects.[4]

Land Release

Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty and in accordance with its second extension request, which was granted by the Tenth Meeting of States Parties in 2010, Denmark was required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 July 2012.

In 2008, Denmark presented a first request for an extension of 22 months until 1 January 2011.[5] On 18 June 2010, Denmark submitted a second extension request, seeking an additional 18 months to enable it to complete mine clearance operations.[6] In December 2010, the Tenth Meeting of States Parties granted Denmark’s request for a second extension to its Article 5 deadline, until 1 July 2012.[7] In granting the request, it was noted at the meeting that Denmark had “complied with the commitments it had made, as recorded in the decisions of the Ninth Meeting of States Parties, to obtain clarity regarding the remaining challenge, produce a detailed plan and submit a second extension request.” It noted that this affirmed “the importance of a State Party, should it find itself in a situation similar to that of Denmark in 2008, requesting only the period of time necessary to assess relevant facts and develop a meaningful forward looking plan based on these facts.”[8]

In June 2011, Denmark stated that 310,000m2 of area was still to be cleared from the World War II minefield on the Skallingen peninsula and again affirmed that the remaining area would be cleared by its July 2012 deadline or before. It noted, however, that clearing the dunes has been “challenging.” In May 2012, Denmark reported that although clearance would be complete by its deadline, QC measures would likely take several months beyond that.[9] On 5 July 2012, Denmark issued a public statement announcing completion of its Article 5 obligations.[10]

Quality management

Denmark developed standards for clearance on Skallingen based on the International Mine Action Standards (IMAS).[11]

 



[1] Statement of Denmark, Ninth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 25 November 2008.

[2] Article 5 deadline Extension Request, Executive Summary, 21 October 2008, p. 1.

[3] Ibid, p. 2.

[4] Ibid, p. 1.

[5] Article 5 deadline Extension Request (Revision), 28 August 2008.

[6] Second Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 18 June 2010, p. 3.

[7] “Decisions on the Request Submitted by Denmark for an Extension of the Deadline for Completing the Destruction of Anti-Personnel Mines in Accordance with Article 5 of the Convention,” Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3 December 2010.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Statement of Denmark, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012.

[10] Danish Ministry of Transport/ISU, “Denmark clears World War II minefield, declares itself free of mines,” Press Release, Geneva and Copenhagen, 5 July 2012.

[11] Article 5 deadline Extension Request, Executive Summary, 21 October 2008, p. 2.


Last Updated: 01 November 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

In 2011, Denmark contributed DKK52.2 million (US$9,750,630) in mine action funding.[1] As in 2009 and 2010, the largest contribution (DKK14 million/$2.6 million) went to Afghanistan, with Libya also receiving DKK9 million ($1.68 million).

Denmark funded a Small Arms Survey project in Sudan that attempted to determine if new mine laying was occurring and also contributed DKK2 million (some US$374,000) to mine action in Myanmar/Burma.

 Contributions by recipient: 2011[2]

Recipient

Sector

Amount (DKK)

Amount ($)

Afghanistan

Clearance

14,000,000

2,615,112

Libya

Clearance

9,000,000

1,681,143

Global

Clearance

7,900,000

1,475,670

ICRC

Victim assistance

5,000,000

933,968

Somalia

Clearance

4,000,000

747,175

South Sudan

Clearance

4,000,000

747,175

DRC

Clearance

3,000,000

560,381

Small Arms Survey

Advocacy

2,500,000

466,984

Myanmar/Burma

Clearance

2,000,000

373,587

GICHD

Various

800,000

149,435

Totals

 

52,200,000

9,750,630

Denmark allocated 83% of its mine action support in 2011 for clearance activities. All of its contribution of DKK5 million ($934,000) for victim assistance went to the ICRC.

Contributions by thematic sector: 2011

Sector

Amount (DKK)

Amount ($)

% of total funding

Clearance

43,500,000

8,125,525

83

Victim assistance

5,000,000

933,968

10

Advocacy

2,900,000

541,702

6

Various

800,000

149,435

1

Total

52,200,000

9,750,630

100

Denmark’s contribution to mine action in 2011 decreased by 5% from 2010, the third consecutive year of decline. In 2007–2011, Denmark’s contribution for mine action totaled almost DKK310 million (approximately $58 million), with an annual contribution averaging approximately DKK62 million ($11.6 million).

Summary of contributions: 2007–2011[3]

Year

Amount (DKK)

Amount ($)

2011

52,200,000

9,750,630

2010

57,506,382

10,220,630

2009

59,890,000

11,178,930

2008

74,630,000

14,666,410

2007

65,702,278

12,074,740

Totals

309,928,660

57,891,340

 

 



[1] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Katrine Joensen, Head of Section, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1 May 2012.

[2] Average exchange rate for 2011: DKK5.3535 = US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012.

[3] See previous editions of Landmine Monitor; and ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Denmark: Support for Mine Action,” www.the-monitor.org, 15 September 2011. Amounts in US$ have been rounded to the nearest ten. Average exchange rate for 2011: DKK5.3535 = US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012. Average exchange rate for 2010: US$1 = DKK5.6265; 2009: US$1 = DKK5.3574; 2008: US$1 = DKK5.0885; and 2007: US$1 = DKK5.4413. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 6 January 2011.