Mozambique

Last Updated: 02 November 2011

Mine Ban Policy

Mine Ban Policy

The Republic of Mozambique signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 25 August 1998, becoming a State Party on 1 March 1999. Mozambique has regularly reported that draft implementing legislation was submitted to Parliament for analysis and discussed by the Council of Ministers, but the law had yet to be enacted as of October 2011.[1]

Mozambique last submitted a Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report in 2010, for calendar year 2009.[2]

Mozambique participated in the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva in June 2011.

Mozambique is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, use, stockpile destruction, and retention

Mozambique has never produced or exported antipersonnel mines.[3] Throughout the civil war, antipersonnel mines were imported from many countries and used by different parties to the conflict. Mozambique completed destruction of its stockpile of 37,318 antipersonnel mines on 28 February 2003, a few days before its treaty-mandated deadline.[4]

In its Article 7 report submitted for calendar year 2009, Mozambique reported that it retained a total of 1,943 mines for training purposes.[5]

Mozambique did not report on mines actually consumed during 2009 for training purposes and has not yet provided details on the intended purposes and actual uses of its retained mines, as agreed by States Parties at the First Review Conference in December 2004.

 



[1] Mozambique stated in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2010 that a proposed law to fulfill Article 9 of the Mine Ban Treaty had been submitted to Parliament. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2009), Form A.

[2] Nine previous reports were submitted: in 2009, in 2007, on 27 April 2006, 25 April 2005, 23 April 2004, in 2003 (for the period 1 January 2002–1 March 2003), 2 July 2002, 30 October 2001, and 30 March 2000.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2006), Form E, and earlier Article 7 reports.

[4] For more details, see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 580; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2008), Form B. Mozambique initially reported that it destroyed 37,818 mines, but later changed the figure to 37,318.

[5] A full list of mine types retained is included in the 2009 Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report under Form J. 900 mines were held by FADM, 520 by IND, 343 by APOPO, 128 by HALO, and 52 by HI.  Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2009), Form D. In the previous report, Mozambique cited a total figure of 1,963 mines in the Form D table, but the actual total of the mines listed within the table adds up to 2,088. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2008), Form D. This surpasses the 1,265 antipersonnel mines last reported at the end of 2006, and the numbers cited in prior reports. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2006), Form D. For details see Landmine Monitor Report 2007, p. 530. Mozambique’s first three Article 7 reports stated that no antipersonnel mines would be retained for training or development purposes.


Last Updated: 16 August 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions

Convention on Cluster Munitions status

State Party

Stockpile destruction

Declared a stockpile and requested support for its destruction

Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings

Participated in Second Meeting of States Parties in September 2011 in Beirut, Lebanon, intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2012, and regional conference in Accra, Ghana in May 2012

Key developments

Became a State Party on 1 September 2011. Provided initial Article 7 report in July 2012.

Policy

The Republic of Mozambique signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008 and ratified on 14 March 2011. The convention entered into force for Mozambique on 1 September 2011.

Mozambique provided its initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report in June 2012, for the period from 1 September 2011 to 31 May 2012.[1] According to the report, the government “is undertaking a review of legislation to ensure compliance with obligations” under Article 9 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[2]

Mozambique was one of just three African states that attended the launch in February 2007 of the Oslo Process that produced the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It participated actively throughout the Oslo Process and was a strong advocate for a comprehensive ban without exceptions, as well as for victim assistance and international cooperation and assistance.[3]

Mozambique has continued to actively engage in the work of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It attended the convention’s Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011, as well as intersessional meetings in April 2012. Mozambique attended the Accra Regional Conference on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in May 2012, where it endorsed the Accra Universalization Action Plan issued by the conference and made a presentation on victim assistance.

Mozambique is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Mozambique has not yet made known its views on certain important issues related to interpretation and implementation of the convention, including the prohibition on transit, the prohibition on assistance during joint military operations with states not party that may use cluster munitions, the prohibition on foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions, the prohibition on investment in production of cluster munitions, and the need for retention of cluster munitions and submunitions for training and development purposes.

Convention on Conventional Weapons

Mozambique is not a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), but it participated as an observer in the CCW’s Fourth Review Conference in Geneva in November 2011.

During the Review Conference, Mozambique joined a group of states opposed to the adoption of a draft protocol on cluster munitions. On the final day of the conference, Mozambique was one of 50 countries that issued a joint statement declaring that there was no consensus on the draft protocol and that it did not address fundamental humanitarian concerns.[4]

The Review Conference ended without reaching agreement on the draft protocol, thus concluding the CCW’s work on cluster munitions.

Use, production, and transfer

In June 2012, Mozambique has declared that it “never produced” cluster munitions and “therefore has no need to convert or decommission such facilities.”[5]

Previously, in June 2011, a government representative stated that Mozambique is not a producer of cluster munitions and said that the country “never had the capacity to produce” cluster munitions. The representative also confirmed that Mozambique “never used cluster munitions.”[6]

It is not known who used cluster munitions in Mozambique in the past. In its Article 7 report, Mozambique declared that cluster munition remnants, including submunitions from RBK-250 and CB-470 containers, have been found in the provinces of Tete, Manica, Gaza and Maputo.[7]  In September 2011, Mozambique requested that “State Parties in a position to do so … provide any technical data on previous cluster munitions strikes within the territory of Mozambique that may be available in their military archives.[8]

Mozambique’s declaration of a stockpile indicates past importation of cluster munitions.

Stockpiling and destruction

In its initial Article 7 report (June 2012), Mozambique declared a stockpile of 290 cluster munitions and 22,656 submunitions of two types: 97 RBK-250 bombs, each containing 150 submunitions (14,550) and 193 RBK-250, each containing 42 PTAB submunitions (8,106).[9]

The stockpile was identified during a review by the Ministry of Defence and according to the report, “[t]he Ministry of Defence will separate the cluster munitions from other munitions maintained for operational use and is developing a plan for destruction of all cluster munitions in its stockpile. The Ministry of Defence will request technical assistance and financial support to complete the destruction process.”[10]

Under Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Mozambique is required to destroy all its stockpiled cluster munitions as soon as possible, but not later than 1 September 2019.

According to Mozambique’s Article 7 report, it has not retained any cluster munitions for training or research purposes as permitted by Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

 



[1] The report is dated “XX June 2012.” It was provided to the Monitor and had not yet been uploaded to the UN website as of 31 July 2012.

[2] Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Form A, June 2012.

[3] For detail on Mozambique’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 122–123.

[4] Joint Statement read by Costa Rica, on behalf of Afghanistan, Angola, Austria, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Holy See, Honduras, Iceland, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Senegal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe. CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 25 November 2011. List confirmed in email from Bantan Nugroho, Head of the CCW Implementation Support Unit, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs, 1 June 2012.

[5] Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Form E, June 2012.

[6] Interview with Isabel Massango, Head of Department of National Demining Institute, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Geneva, 27 June 2011.

[7] Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Form F, June 2012.

[8] Statement of Mozambique on Cooperation and Assistance, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 15 September 2011, http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/ca_mozambique.pdf.

[9] Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Form B, June 2012.

[10] Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Form B, June 2012. The request for technical and financial assistance is also made under the Form B – Part II, section 6 on “Challenges and international assistance and cooperation needed for the implementation of Article 3.”


Last Updated: 26 September 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mozambique is affected by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), a legacy of nearly 30 years of conflict that ended in 1992.[1]

Mines

Since 2008, Mozambique has identified three times more mined area than it expected. The 2006–2007 baseline survey of Mozambique, conducted by HALO Trust, provided the basis for the 2008–2014 National Mine Action Plan and Mozambique’s Article 5 deadline extension request. The baseline survey identified 541 suspect hazardous areas (SHAs) covering 12.2km2, in Gaza, Inhambane, Manica, Maputo, Sofala, and Tête provinces.[2]

Since 2008, however, surveys have identified a further 512 SHAs not captured in the baseline survey covering a total of 22.2km2. This includes 146 SHAs that were identified in the four northern provinces of Cabo Delgado, Nampula, Niassa, and Zambezia. These results, combined with the baseline survey, tripled the total estimated contaminated area to 34.4km2 across 1,053 SHAs.[3] Nonetheless, Mozambique may still meet its extended Article 5 deadline of 1 March 2014. As of the end of 2011, 377 SHAs remained covering 16km2.[4]

 As of January 2012, 86 of Mozambique’s 128 districts had been declared “mine-free”; this left 42 districts in eight provinces, including the two northern provinces of Niassa and Cabo Delgado, as contaminated of the end of 2011. Approximately 75% of the remaining tasks are in Sofala and Inhambane provinces. The National Demining Institute (IND) planned to declare land release in another 25 districts complete in 2012.[5]

Mined areas remaining, by province, as of end 2011[6]

Province

No. of districts

Tasks

Area (m2)

Sofala

7

178

6,310,380

Manica

7

37

3,169,710

Inhambane

6

109

2,498,531

Tete

7

16

1,785,830

Maputo

4

22

1,020,192

Niassa

4

8

569,911

Gaza

3

3

378,473

Cabo Delgado

2

4

309,109

Totals

40

377

16,042,136

Cluster munition remnants

In its initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Mozambique indicated that the extent of areas contaminated by cluster munitions is not known. It reported that a small number of cluster munitions, including both unexploded submunitions and RBK-250 and CB-470 containers, were found from 2005–2012 in the Guro district in Manica province; in Mulataine, Boane district in Maputo province; in the Mabalane district, Gaza province; and in the Changara district, Tête province; all of these cluster munitions were destroyed.[7] In 2010, APOPO reported finding one dispenser containing 150 submunitions in Gaza province.[8] HALO Trust, Handicap International (HI), and APOPO all reported they did not find any submunitions in 2011.[9] There were no known victims of cluster munitions in 2011.[10]

Other explosive remnants of war

IND believes addressing the ERW problem will present challenges for the government for years.[11] HI has reported ERW incidents occur in rural areas in the course of normal community activities, such as food and water collection, farming, herding, or household work.[12]

In 2011, 133 of the 853 villages HALO Trust visited reported the presence of UXO. HALO destroyed 281 items of UXO in these villages, which were in Manica, Maputo, and Tête provinces.[13] HI reported conducting 49 UXO tasks in Inhambane and Sofala provinces.[14] As part of explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) training for the police, IND destroyed a total of 239 UXO found in the provinces of Niassa and Cabo Delgado.[15]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2012

National Mine Action Authority

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Mine action center

National Demining Institute (IND)

International demining operators

NGOs: HALO Trust, HI, and APOPO

National demining operators

Mozambican Armed Forces

Commercial companies: BACTEC, EMD, JV Desminagem, Mine Kills, MF Investimentos, Moprotector, Monechecha, DAG, Namacoma

International risk education operators

HALO Trust, HI, and APOPO

National risk education operators

IND

IND serves as the mine action center in Mozambique under the supervision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is mandated to coordinate and oversee implementation of demining programs, including quality assurance (QA), quality control (QC), and information management.[16]

Provincial demining commissions have been created that include the Directorate of Planning and Finance, the Provincial Police Command, and the army. Other sectors are represented on the commissions depending on the province. For instance, the Inhambane commission includes representatives from the tourist industry, and in Tête the mineral resources sector is represented on the commission.[17]

In 2011, the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) produced a study on the evolvement of national ownership of mine action in Mozambique since the 1990s. The study found that even though Mozambique has made considerable progress in clearing mined areas since 2008 and is within reach of meeting its 2014 Article 5 deadline (pending continued international support and the successful identification of all known mined areas), IND oversight of commercial demining and surveys for development needs strengthening if it is to continue.[18] Also, in its initial Article 7 report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions submitted in July 2012, Mozambique claimed it needed continued international technical and financial assistance as well as 10 years to determine and address the extent of the cluster munition problem.[19]

UNDP has provided technical assistance since 1999. The current structure and the position of UNDP international technical advisor have been supported since 2008 under the project “Weapons Risk Mitigation and Mainstreaming Mine Action, Small Arms and Light Weapons Controls 2008–2011.”[20] The UN Development Assistance Framework for Mozambique (UNDAF) 2012–2015 lists supporting Mozambique to meet its Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 obligations as part of its disaster relief and risk reduction efforts.[21]

Mine action in Mozambique has widely applied the UN gender guidelines. The 2011 GICHD study on the transition to national ownership in mine action attributed the active role women play in mine action to the fact that equality between men and women is stated in the Constitution. Additionally, at the grass roots level women voice their opinions in surveys and consultations with local communities; local Consultative Councils always have at least one female member to express the views and advocate on behalf of all women in the community. One of commercial demining companies is directed by a woman, as are the legal, international, and human resource departments at IND. The head of the legal department at IND, who attended a James Madison University mine action training course that included gender issues, is responsible for promoting gender awareness in mine action in Mozambique.[22]

Land Release

Since 2008, Mozambique has released 708 SHAs covering 20km2, leaving 377 SHAs covering 16km2 to release as of 31 December 2011.

Mozambique planned to clear 8km2 in 2012 and declare 25 districts “mine free” in Cabo Delgado, Gaza, Inhambane, Manica, Maputo, Niassa, Sofala, and Tête provinces and to complete mine clearance in the entire provinces of Cabo Delgado, Gaza, and Niassa.[23] In 2012, as of the end of June, Mozambique had released another 1.8km2. IND expected productivity to increase during the second half of the year, as is typical after the rainy season. Also, IND has contracted commercial operators to begin clearance in July and August to augment the work done by the NGOs.[24] Additionally, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA)’s mine action team returned to Mozambique in July 2012 and will initially conduct 10 tasks consisting of approximately 60,000m2 of clearance in five districts in Tête province as well as district surveys in these areas. NPA is also providing technical support in information management and has assigned an information management officer to assist the IND’s database team.[25]

Survey in 2011

Mozambique’s “Mine Free District Assessment” process requires HALO Trust, HI, and APOPO to visit every village to assess whether there are any remaining SHAs. The Mine Free District Assessment is a technical process of community liaison and post-clearance assessment to confirm that all communities have no remaining mined areas.[26] If the community does not report contamination, it is determined to be free of mined areas. Since 2008, IND has declared 86 districts “mine-free” as a result of the Mine Free District Assessment.

Since Mozambique’s extension request was granted in November 2008, surveys on mined infrastructure sites were completed and in some cases hazardous areas were cleared as well. The Chicamba Dam and the Beira-Machipanda railway lines were surveyed and cleared. The Cahora Bassa Dam, the Limpopo and Komatiport railroads, and Maputo power lines have been surveyed and, as of July 2012, mine clearance operations were ongoing. The Beira I and Beira II power lines were also being surveyed and mine clearance was similarly ongoing. HALO Trust completed surveys along the border with Zimbabwe and mine clearance was ongoing as of July 2012.[27]

The remaining number of tasks and areas could increase in 2012 as surveying continues. However, UNDP does not expect new areas of contamination to be very large because surveys of all the infrastructure sites have been concluded and there were only 10 remaining districts to survey at the end of 2011, further reducing the area where previously unknown mined areas could be identified.[28]

Mine clearance in 2011

IND has organized its demining operations by assigning provinces to the NGOs and developing a work plan based on a district-by-district approach to clearance; the goal is to complete clearance of an entire district before moving on to the next one. HI is operating in the provinces of Inhambane and Sofala; APOPO in Gaza and two districts in Manica province; and HALO in Manica, Maputo, and Tête. In July 2012, NPA began training demining teams and in September 2012, NPA began mine clearance operations in Tête province.[29]

The Mozambican army cleared 6,252m2 of a confirmed hazardous area in Chokwe district in Gaza Province, destroying 33 antipersonnel mines and 24 items of UXO.[30]

IND conducts public tenders each year before contracting commercial companies to survey, clear mines or conduct UXO spot clearance tasks based on information in IND’s database of SHAs. As of 2012, 47 commercial demining operators were licensed by IND to perform this type of work. In 2011, eight commercial operators (Moprotector Desminagem Lda, Empresa Mocambicaca de Desminagem Lda, Mine Kills Lda, DAG Desmainagem & Agricultura Lda, Scorpion Desminagem Lda, Namacoma Desminagem Lda, Monechecha Desminagem Lda, and Sonda/MF Investimentos Lda) were contracted to perform demining, technical survey and EOD operations on 53 SHAs covering a total of 1,360,943m2 of contaminated area. In addition, three commercial operators (Lhanga Investimentos Lda, Vero Lda, and MBCQ Desminagem Lda) were contracted to perform QA and QC over the work of the commercial demining operators. In total, the government of Mozambique provided MZN34,828,488 (US$1,302,585) for commercial demining activities.[31] These activities resulted in the release of all 53 SHAs and the destruction of 49 landmines and 151 items of UXO.

IND reported that a total of 7.8km2 of SHA/confirmed hazardous area (CHA) was released in 2011. HALO Trust, HI, and APOPO cleared 4.55km2 while some commercial companies and the Mozambican army released another 1.37km2 through clearance for a national total of 5.92km2. APOPO released/canceled a further 1.88km2 through technical and non-technical surveys.[32] Mozambique needs to slightly exceed this level of productivity in 2012 and 2013 in order to meet its Article 5 deadline of 1 March 2014.

Clearance results in 2011[33]

Operator

Mined area cleared (m2)

Antipersonnel mines destroyed

Antivehicle mines destroyed

UXO destroyed during mine clearance

HI

2,249,721

86

0

303

HALO

1,551,224

9,439

2

1,598

Commercial Companies

1,360,943

49

0

151

APOPO

753,932

792

0

227

Mozambique Armed Forces

6,252

33

0

24

Totals

5,922,072

10,399

2

2,303

Mine clearance by commercial companies

There are 20 mine clearance private companies and two QA companies registered with IND and licensed to operate in Mozambique. The government of Mozambique, but not IND, also contracts national commercial demining companies to verify and clear areas designated for investment and development projects.[34] To address safety concerns, these companies hire commercial demining companies to verify that areas where they are working are free of landmines, UXO, and any other dangerous items before they begin construction or development in these areas. The companies then perform technical survey and, if necessary, conduct clearance in the contracted areas. Often these areas are not included as SHAs in IND’s database. Some companies report this type of verification work to IND, others only report to IND if they discover UXO or mines in these areas.[35] IND has not fully reported on this type of commercial demining for 2011.

According to a GICHD study on national ownership, however, the companies have no permanent capacity as they operate from contract to contract. They recruit deminers and mobilize equipment only when they are awarded a contract by the government in a competitive bidding process to verify or clear mined areas of public development projects such as roads, schools, and clinics. GICHD found that IND is not always informed of the clearance results in development projects and sometimes the government awards contracts to clear and verify areas that have already been released by IND,[36] raising the question of how much, if any, of the mine clearance paid for by public development projects contributes to Mozambique meeting its Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 clearance obligations.

Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty (and in accordance with the five-year extension request granted in 2008), Mozambique is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2014. In May 2012, at the Intersessional Standing Committee meetings, Mozambique stated its mine action program needed US$17 million in 2012 if it was to stay on course to meet its 2014 deadline.[37]

Determining the number of mined areas has been a challenging exercise in Mozambique. The Landmine Impact Survey (LIS) in 2001 was largely dismissed for identifying approximately 1,200 mined areas covering 575km2. Nonetheless, Mozambique is likely to have cleared almost the same number of mined areas by 2014 (though far less area than the LIS estimated). Its Article 5 deadline extension request and the National Mine Action Plan were formulated based on the information contained in the 2008 baseline survey. The baseline survey was intended to be a comprehensive assessment of the remaining work to be done in the six southern and central provinces based on a consolidation of a number of older surveys that existed at the time, thereby, in theory, reducing duplications. In addition, a number of infrastructure sites had not yet been surveyed at the time of the extension request but surveying them was an important task listed in the extension request.

The 2007 baseline survey was the basis for the estimated annual clearance goals to clear 541 tasks by 2014. Since Mozambique submitted its extension request in 2008, it has identified another 500 or so SHAs through the Mine Free District Assessment, which almost tripled the amount area needed to clear, from 12.2km2 to 34.4km2. Reports of residual contamination in the four northern provinces, the HALO survey on the Zimbabwe border, and surveys of the infrastructure partly explain the increase from the baseline survey. While IND expected the surveys of infrastructure sites to increase the amount of area to clear, it was surprised by how much the baseline survey underestimated the remaining problem in the villages of the southern districts outside the infrastructure sites. As more district surveys were completed, it became apparent that the remaining problem was almost three times larger than estimated by the baseline survey and that mine clearance capacity would have to be increased. Increases in demining capacity have enabled Mozambique to meet annual outputs above the estimates in the extension request and without falling behind its Article 5 deadline extension request operational plan.[38]

In July 2012, IND reported it was confident that additional large areas of suspected mined areas would not be found in the final two years of the extension request. It estimated that as of July 2012, release in 80% of the 128 districts has been completed, leaving some 30 to clear. IND expects some new areas will be discovered but the number will be far less than in previous years and that there are no large unknown mined areas remaining to be found.[39]

Compliance with Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions

Under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Mozambique is required to destroy all cluster munition remnants in areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible but not later than 1 September 2021.

In its initial Article 7 report submitted in July 2012, Mozambique stated it needed technical assistance in determining the extent of any cluster-munition-contaminated area, including a request to former users to provide information on possible locations and type of cluster munition remnants. Mozambique has stated it may need until 2021 to clear all cluster munition remnants, largely because they do not know the full extent of the problem.[40]

Battle area clearance in 2011

The baseline assessment identified six battle area clearance (BAC) tasks measuring 81,285m2: three in Manica, two in Tête, and one in Sofala. These tasks will be included in the district-by-district post-survey planning, to be cleared as each district is cleared. HI, HALO Trust, and APOPO did not conduct any BAC in 2011.[41]

Quality management

Each clearance operator has its own internal quality management (QM) system. IND is responsible for external QC of cleared sites and conducts QA through random visits on all active tasks.[42]

HALO Trust provincial operation managers and location managers conduct regular QA of demining lanes within their area of responsibility. HALO section commanders and supervisors check 100% of mine clearance lanes after deminers have progressed 5–10 meters. HALO supervisors similarly check lanes and HALO senior staff conducted random quality checks of all its mine clearance operations at least once a month.[43]

 HI demining team leaders conduct QA of demining lanes as part of its routine daily operations. QA is also conducted by the two provincial operations supervisors (aided by written checklists) during their site visits. Responsibility for the conduct and monitoring of internal QA/QC lies with the HI chief of operations. IND also conducts QA inspections of HI demining sites at various intervals.

At a national level, IND maintains responsibility for fulfilling QM requirements, which includes random sampling of areas and inspection of completed sites.[44]

APOPO conducts internal QA on both the work of the deminers and the teams with 47 mine detection rats.[45]

Safety of demining personnel

Three deminers in two separate accidents in Gaza province were injured in 2011.[46]

Risk Education

Mine/ERW risk education (RE) was primarily conducted in affected communities during mine clearance, non-technical survey, and through community liaison by the demining operators. Demining operators also mark SHAs. IND coordinates RE in other locations. In 2011, IND conducted 92 RE sessions that were attended by approximately 13,000 people in 15 districts in seven provinces. In the same 12-month period, a total of three landmine and UXO incidents were registered, resulting in nine casualties, of whom three were killed and six injured. IND attributes the decline in annual casualties to an effective RE program.[47] The decline in casualties, however, is also a result of the progress in clearing mines, which since 2008 has greatly reduced the amount of contaminated area that can cause harm.

 



[2] Statement of Mozambique, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 March 2012.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for the period 1 September 2011–31 May 2012), Form F.

[8] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Andrew Sully, Programme Manager, APOPO, 3 May 2011. APOPO deploys rats alongside human deminers to sniff out and detect mines. They identify mines through vapor detection, a technique also used in alcohol breath analyzers, gas leak detectors, food quality sensors, and exhaust emission detectors. For mine detection, APOPO traces the explosives’ vapor emanating from mines. The rats show they have located a mine or UXO by scratching the ground in the vicinity of a mine. Following detection, APOPO assigns a team to clear the mined areas and again deploys the rats for quality assurance.

[9] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, Programme Manager, HALO Trust, 19 March 2012; and by Aderito Ismael, Mine Action Manager, HI, 26 March 2012; and APOPO, Annual Report 2011, March 2012, p. 9.

[10] Email from Hans Risser, Technical Advisor Mine Action, UNDP, 23 July 2012.

[11] UN, “2011 Portfolio of Mine Action Projects,” New York, March 2011, p. 228.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Aderito Ismael, HI, 31 March 2011.

[13] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO Trust, 19 March 2012.

[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012.

[15] Email from IND, 24 August 2012.

[16] UN, “2011 Portfolio of Mine Action Projects,” New York, March 2011, p. 229.

[18] Ibid., pp. 37–43.

[19] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for the period 1 September 2011–31 May 2012), Form I.

[23] Statement of Mozambique, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2011), Form C.

[24] Email from Hans Risser, UNDP, 23 July 2012.

[25] Ibid.

[26]APOPO, “Annual Report 2010,” June 2011, p. 8.

[27] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2011), Form C.

[28] Email from Hans Risser, UNDP, 23 July 2012.

[29] Email from IND, 24 August 2012.

[30] Ibid.

[31] Average exchange rate for 2011: MZN1 = US$0.0374. Oanda, www.oanda.com.

[32] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO Trust, 19 March 2012; Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012; APOPO, “Annual Report 2011,” March 2012, p. 9; and email from Hans Risser, UNDP, 23 July 2012.

[33] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO Trust, 19 March 2012; Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012; APOPO, “Annual Report 2011,” March 2012, p. 9.

[34] UN, “Portfolio of Mine Action Projects in 2011,” New York, March 2011, p. 229.

[35] Email from IND, 24 August 2012.

[37] Statement of Mozambique, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012.

[38] Email from Hans Risser, UNDP, 23 July 2012.

[39] Ibid.

[40] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for the period 1 September 2011–31 May 2012), Form I.

[41] HALO, “Baseline Assessment of Minefields in South and Central Mozambique, Final Report,” October 2007, p. 25, and from the detailed list of all tasks identified in the Baseline Assessment provided to the Monitor; responses to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO, 19 March 2012; and by Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012.

[42] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO, 19 March 2012; and by Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012.

[43] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Richard Evans, HALO, 19 March 2012.

[44] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Aderito Ismael, HI, 26 March 2012.

[45] APOPO, Annual Report 2011, March 2012, p. 9.

[46] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form I, 30 March 2012.

[47] Ibid.


Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2011

Unknown; at least 2,444

Casualties in 2011

9 (2010: 36)

2011 casualties by outcome

3 killed; 6 injured (2010: 6 killed; 27 injured; 3 unknown)

2011 casualties by item type

3 antipersonnel mines; 6 unknown explosive items

In 2011, the National Demining Institute (Instituto Nacional de Desminagem, IND) reported nine mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties in Mozambique.[1] There were six civilian casualties including three women, one girl, one boy, and a man. All the civilian casualties occurred in Sofala province. In addition, there were three casualties among deminers during clearance operations. One deminer was killed and two were injured in two separate incidents with antipersonnel mines in Gaza province.

The nine casualties identified in 2011 represented a significant decrease from the 36 casualties reported in 2010.[2] Although IND attributed the decline in casualties in 2011 to an increase in the effectiveness of its mine risk education program, it also associated a lack of funding for mine risk education with a rise in the annual casualty rate in 2010.[3] There was no information available as to whether any of the nine casualties had received risk education. It was known that many casualties went unreported.[4]

The total number of mine/ERW casualties in Mozambique is unknown, but there were at least 2,444 through the end of 2011. The most comprehensive collection of casualty data remains the nationwide Landmine Impact Survey (LIS), completed in 2001; it recorded 2,145 mine/ERW casualties, but did not provide a breakdown of those killed and injured.[5] An additional 299 casualties (80 killed; 216 injured; three unknown) had been identified between 2002 and 2011.[6] There were known to be casualties from incidents involving cluster munition remnants, though these were not distinguished from ERW in the data and would require a survey to identify them.[7]

Victim Assistance

The total number of mine/ERW survivors in Mozambique is not known. In 2009 and 2010, 865 survivors were identified through needs assessments which were limited to just a few districts in each of three provinces (Maputo, Inhambane and Sofala). The Monitor has recorded at least new 220 survivors throughout the country since 1999.[8]

Victim assistance since 1999[9]

Since monitoring began in 1999, most mine/ERW survivors in Mozambique have lacked access to victim assistance services of all kinds. With most survivors based in rural areas, far from where services are located, a lack of affordable transportation and knowledge of available services have been among the greatest obstacles to access. Thirty years of armed conflict damaged or destroyed some 40% of Mozambique’s medical facilities; the rebuilding of facilities, particularly outside of major urban centers, has been slow. Since 2005, there have been some improvements in the availability of medical care in rural areas. During this period, six rehabilitation centers have been renovated.

By 2009, all medical and rehabilitation centers were managed by the government, many of which had previously been managed by international organizations such as POWER, Handicap International (HI) and the Mozambique Red Cross. Rehabilitation centers remained dependent on international financial assistance. Seven of Mozambique’s 10 rehabilitation centers offered accommodation but it was reported that demand for space had sometimes exceeded availability. The supply of rehabilitation services was limited due to a lack of trained technicians and materials. The launching of a national training course for prosthetists and orthotists in 2009, the first of its kind in the country, was expected to improve the quality and availability of services, though this impact had not been felt through 2011.

Throughout the period, survivors have had almost no access to economic and social inclusion programs or psychological assistance. International and national NGOs, including the Network for Mine Victims (Rede para Assistência às Vítimas de Minas, RAVIM), have reached a limited number of survivors to assist them in accessing services, provide basic economic relief or provide support for income generating projects.

Since 2004, Mozambique identified victim assistance as the weakest component of its mine action program. The IND, the Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Saude, MISAU), and the Ministry of Women and Social Action (Ministério da Mulher e da Acção Social, MMAS) officially shared responsibility for the coordination of victim assistance, but Mozambique has lacked a coordination mechanism and a victim assistance plan. In 2010, IND and MMAS began efforts to integrate victim assistance into broader disability frameworks.

Victim assistance in 2011

In 2011, there was increased awareness about the availability of free medical and rehabilitation services for mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities. This resulted in greater demand for these services without any corresponding increase in number of medical professionals or medical and rehabilitative supplies available. Consequently, waiting lists to receive care grew throughout the country.[10] During the year, the greatest obstacle to accessing services remained the lack of transportation available for survivors living in rural communities and the lack of services in these areas.

Assessing victim assistance needs

In 2011, no efforts were made to assess the needs of mine/ERW survivors and very little information was available about where survivors were located and what their needs were. Starting in 2012, clearance operators began conducting survivor surveys as part of their ongoing district–to–district clearance operations.[11] Previously, a limited survey was undertaken in specific geographic areas. In 2009, RAVIM carried out a pilot survey of survivors needs in four districts in Maputo province, identifying 542 survivors.[12] As part of this survey, survivors were assisted in accessing needed services within the limited funding available for the survey.[13] In 2010, RAVIM and HI conducted a needs assessment in 12 districts in Inhambane and Sofala provinces, identifying 323 survivors.[14]

In 2011, RAVIM and HI held meetings with IND and MMAS to coordinate a nine-month needs assessment of a representative sample of survivors to be carried out in 2012. The survey was to identify the needs of survivors, develop recommendations on how to address these needs and disseminate survey findings to victim assistance stakeholders in the country, including to MMAS and MISAU.[15]

Victim assistance coordination in 2011[16]

Government coordinating body/focal point

Responsibility shared among IND, the MISAU, and the MMAS

Coordinating mechanism

None: National Disability Council was formed in September 2009 to coordinate disability issues

Plan

None: however, the draft National Disability Plan 2012-2019 included mine/ERW survivors, along with other persons with disabilities, and the National Mine Action Plan includes victim assistance objectives

IND, the MISAU, and MMAS officially shared responsibility for the coordination of victim assistance. However, there was no coordination for victim assistance specifically; no coordination meetings were held for victim assistance during the year.[17] In 2012, Mozambique reported that the Chief of the Department for Persons with Disabilities within the MMAS was the designated Victim Assistance Focal Point for the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[18]

The National Disability Council, formed in 2009, held two high level meetings as well as four meetings of the technical committee during 2011. Meetings focused on completing the evaluation of the implementation of the National Disability Plan 2006–2010 and the development of a new plan for the period 2012–2019. IND provided input during the evaluation of the previous plan and worked to ensure the inclusion of victim assistance in the new plan.[19] As a result, victim assistance was included in the final version of the plan. As of 1 June 2012, the National Disability Plan 2012–2019 was completed but had not yet been approved.[20] The plan reportedly included a budget, but as of May 2012 funding to implement the plan had not been identified.[21]

Provincial disability councils, established in each of the 11 provinces of Mozambique, were to become operational in 2012.[22] Coordination by the Disability Council remained weak and largely ineffective and the Council was seen to have little impact on the lives of persons with disabilities. This was attributed to a lack of funding for its operations.[23]

The evaluation of the National Disability Plan for 2006–2010 found that a lack of financial and human resources, and other constraints, had resulted in the slow progress of its implementation. However, due to the efforts of NGOs and some government institutions, there were some specific improvements in the lives of persons with disabilities.[24] Representatives of disabled person’s organizations (DPOs) found the Plan’s implementation to have been “a real disappointment.”[25] Constraints on the implementation of the National Disability Plan included the lack of a budget associated with the plan, the concentration of its implementation in provincial capitals and not in rural areas, the frequent turnover of staff in institutions that were responsible for monitoring the plan’s implementation, the failure of ministries involved to provide disability services to integrate the plan into relevant plans and budgets of each ministry, a decline in international support for disability in Mozambique during the five-year period of the Plan, and a lack of involvement of DPOs in the monitoring and implementation of the Plan.[26]

Mozambique provided an update on progress and challenges for victim assistance at the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Phnom Penh in December 2011 and at the Mine Ban Treaty intersessional meetings in Geneva in May 2012.[27] It provided limited casualty data in its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for calendar year 2011.[28] At the Convention on Cluster Munition Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut in September 2011, Mozambique indicated that cluster munition victims would be assisted through existing disability mechanisms and that the country required international assistance to identify and survey cluster munition victims.[29] In its initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, submitted in 2012, Mozambique named the victim assistance focal point and stated that the needs of cluster munition victims were addressed within a broader disability framework.[30]

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

In 2011, survivors or their representative organizations did not participate directly in coordination meetings of the National Disability Council. The National Federation of Associations of Persons with Disabilities (FAMOD), which represents such organizations, did attend; however, all three representatives of FAMOD who participated in coordination meetings indicated that their views were not considered.[31] Representatives of FAMOD participated in the development of the National Disability Plan 2012–2019 and also formed part of a team that conducted interviews throughout the country as part of the plan development process. [32]

Survivors were involved in implementing socio-economic reintegration activities, carrying out advocacy and assisting other survivors in accessing health and rehabilitation services through RAVIM.[33]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities[34]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2011

MISAU

Government

Medical attention and physical rehabilitation through 10 orthopedic centers; housing in seven residential centers while receiving attention in some provinces, for all persons with disabilities

Ongoing

MMAS

Government

Food subsidy program and other social benefits; implementation of quotas for employment in public sector and management of database for public sector jobs

Ongoing

RAVIM

National NGO

Data collection, advocacy, referrals, and transportation to increase access to services; socio-economic reintegration for mine/ERW survivors in Sofala province

Increased geographic coverage with five-month project in Sofala province; funding decreased compared with 2010 and demand for assistance outstripped available funding

HI

International NGO

Advocacy and capacity-building for disabled persons’ organizations; referrals and assistance in accessing available services

In partnership with RAVIM, established information and support services for persons with disabilities in Maputo and Matola

No notable improvements were seen in the quality or availability of medical care or physical rehabilitation services; waiting times to access these services increased during the year.[35] RAVIM and HI established an “Information, Orientation and Social Support Service” in Maputo and Matola, two cities in Maputo province, to assist persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors, to access available services and find other needed assistance. RAVIM and HI coordinated with local authorities in both cities.[36]

Psychological support and social inclusion programs remained entirely absent with no changes reported.[37] RAVIM implemented a new, short-term project to support income-generating activities for survivors and their families in Sofala province.[38]

The National Strategy for Basic Social Protection (ENSSB), approved in August 2011, included persons with disabilities among the priority groups of the new program.[39] As in previous years, MMAS continued to provide food subsidies and other basic social assistance to persons with disabilities.[40] However, there was no information on how many, if any, of these beneficiaries were mine/ERW survivors and RAVIM found that most survivors lacked any support to promote their economic inclusion.[41]

As part of the Strategy for Persons with Disabilities in Public Service, MMAS provided job training, managed a database of public sector jobs, and worked to promote employment for persons with disabilities through a quota system within the public sector.[42] However, throughout 2011, few persons with disabilities were employed in the formal sector and they continued to face discrimination in seeking employment.[43]

Legislation guaranteed the rights and equal opportunities of persons with disabilities. However, the government lacked the resources to implement the law and discrimination remained common.[44] There was no law requiring the accessibility of public buildings, though the Ministry of Public Works made slow progress in ensuring access to public buildings in Maputo for persons with disabilities.[45]

The evaluation of the National Disability Plan 2006–2010 found that many programs for persons with disabilities sought to promote the inclusion of women with disabilities but that, despite these efforts, women with disabilities still suffered greater discrimination than men with disabilities, with more living in poverty and experiencing lower employment rates.[46]

Mozambique ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 30 January 2012.

 



1 Email from Hans Risser, UNDP Technical Advisor, Mine Action, IND, 19 June 2012.

[2] Monitor analysis of casualty data provided by: emails from with António Belchior Vaz Martin, Head of Operations, IND, 27 July 11; and Henrik Mathiesen, Project Officer, HALO Trust Mozambique, 24 August 2011; and responses to Monitor questionnaire from Andrew Sully, Programme Manager, APOPO, 3 May 2011; Helen Grey, Programme Manager, HALO, 4 May 2011; and Aderito Ismael, Mine Action Manager, Handicap International (HI), 31 March 2011.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the calendar year 2011), Form I; and IND, “Relatório de Anual do Programa de Acção contra Minas 2010” (“Mine Action Annual Report 2010”), Maputo, July 2011, pp. 2 , 10.

[4] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, Project Coordinator, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[5] Among “recent” casualties, the LIS estimated that one-third of the people were killed and two-thirds were injured. “Landmine Impact Survey – Republic of Mozambique,” September 2001, pp. 30, 35.

[6] See previous Monitor country profiles for Mozambique for details, www.the-monitor.org.

[7] Statement of Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 16 September 2011; and interview with António Belchior Vaz Martin, IND, and Mila Massango, Head of International Affairs, IND, in Geneva, 22 June 2010.

[8] It is possible that there is overlap between the two figures identified. See previous Monitor country profiles for Mozambique for details, www.the-monitor.org; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[9] See previous Mozambique country profiles in the Monitor: www.the-monitor.org.

[10] Interview with Macario Dubalelane, Head of Department for Persons with Disabilities, MMAS, in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[11] Interview with Alberto Maverengue Augusto, Director, IND, in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, Director, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Interview with Macario Dubalelane, MMAS, in Geneva, 21 May 2012; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[17] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[18] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report (for the period 1 September 2011 to 31 May 2012), Form H.

[19] Interview with Alberto Maverengue Augusto, IND, in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[20] Email from Macario Dubalelane, MMAS, 24 June 2012.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Ibid., in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[23] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012; and by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012; and statement of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012.

[24] MMAS, “Report on the Evaluation of the National Disability Plan 2006–2010,” Maputo, April 2011, pp. 18–19.

[25] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 13 May 2011.

[26] MMAS, “Report on the Evaluation of the National Disability Plan 2006–2010,” Maputo, April 2011, pp. 17–18.

[27] Statement of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011; and statement of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012.

[28] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the calendar year 2011), Form I.

[29] Statement of Mozambique, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Working Group on Cooperation and Assistance, Beirut, 16 September 2011.

[30] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report (for the period 1 September 2011 to 31 May 2012), Form H.

[31] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[32] Interview with Macario Dubalelane, MMAS, in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[33] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[34] In Mozambique there are numerous disabled persons’ organizations that have not provided information or registered changes in their services during 2011. Statements of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011; and Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012; interview with Macario Dubalelane, MMAS, in Geneva, 21 May 2012; and responses to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique , 22 June 2012; and Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[35] Interview with Macario Dubalelane, MMAS, in Geneva, 21 May 2012.

[36] Ibid.; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[37] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[38] Ibid.

[39] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Emmanuel Mounier, HI Mozambique, 22 June 2012.

[40] Statement of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011.

[41] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 13 May 2011.

[42] Statement of Mozambique, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011.

[43] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mozambique,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[44] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Luis Silvestre Wamusse, RAVIM, 7 June 2012.

[45] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mozambique,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[46] MMAS, “Report on the Evaluation of the National Disability Plan 2006–2010,” Maputo, April 2011, pp. 13–14.


Last Updated: 28 June 2013

Support for Mine Action

In 2011, five donors contributed US$6.5 million for clearance operations to HALO Trust, APOPO and Handicap International.[1]

In April 2012, Australia announced it had contributed A$3 million (US$3.1 million) to Mozambique mine action and Japan announced in June 2012 it had contributed approximately $2 million.[2] In May 2012, at the intersessional Standing Committee meetings, the Republic of Mozambique stated its mine action program needed $17 million if it was to stay on course to meet its March 2014 deadline.[3]

Mozambique contributed US$2,390,000 towards its mine action program.[4] Since 2007 the government of Mozambique has contributed approximately 20% of the total mine action budget.

International contributions: 2011[5]

Donor Country

Sector

Amount (national currency)

Amount ($)

US

Clearance

$2,175,000

2,175,000

Belgium

Clearance

€1,191,927

1,660,474

Norway

Clearance

NOK5,520,083

985,342

UK

Clearance

£592,526

950,589

Japan

Clearance

¥55,040,103

690,591

Total

 

 

6,461,996

Summary of contributions: 2007–2011[6]

Year

National contributions ($)

International contributions ($)

Total contributions ($)

2011

2,390,000

6,461,997

8,851,997

2010

1,422,000

11,526,279

12,948,279

2009

1,608,087

6,470,726

8,078,813

2008

1,563,270

3,184,248

4,747,518

2007

1,300,000

3,483,411

4,783,411

Total

8,283,357

31,126,661

39,410,018

 

 



[1] Belgium Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7, Form I, 30 April 2012. Japan Mine Ban Treaty Article 7, Form J, 12 May 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Hannah Binci, Security and Justice Team, Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department, DfID, 9 May 2012; and US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2011,” Washington, DC, July 2012.

[2]Australia supports demining in Mozambique,” UNDP, 24 April 2012, and “Moçambique: Japão doa mais de Usd 2 milhões para programa de desminagem até 2014” (“Mozambique: Japan donates over USD 2 million for demining program until 2014”), Radio Mozambique, 15 June 2012.

[3] Statement of Mozambique, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Average exchange rates for 2011: €1=US$1.3931; ¥79.7=US$1; NOK5.6022=US$1; £1=US$1.6043. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012.

[6] Instituto Nacional de Desminagem (National Institute for Demining), “Relatório do Programa de Acção contra Minas 2010” (“Action against Mines Program Report 2010”), July 2011, p. 16; and see ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Mozambique, Support for Mine Action,” 26 August 2011.