Nepal

Last Updated: 11 October 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Abstained from voting on Resolution 66/29in December 2011

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

None since November-December 2010

Policy

The Republic of Nepal has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. In December 2010, Nepal stated that recommendations regarding accession to the Mine Ban Treaty would be completed “soon.”[1]

The November 2006 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) committed the government and the Unified Communist Party of Nepal/Maoist rebels to halt the use of mines, and required the parties to assist each other to mark and clear mines and booby-traps.[2]

In February 2010, the Minister of Peace and Reconstruction initiated a ministerial-level committee to study the responsibilities of and opportunities for becoming a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty.[3] As of 1 September 2012, the committee had not been able to compile a report due to the frequent change in personnel holding the position of minister in the Ministry of Home Affairs and Defense during the time period. The committee met again in March 2012.[4]

Nepal did not attend the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties in Phnom Penh in November–December 2011 or the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in May 2012. On 2 December 2011, Nepal abstained from voting on UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 66/29 calling for universalization of the Mine Ban Treaty. This was the fifth consecutive year that Nepal abstained on the annual resolution, after voting in favor of all previous pro-ban resolutions since 1996.[5]

In May and June 2011, the Nepal Campaign to Ban Landmines (NCBL) met with the prime minister, the foreign minister, the defense minister, and the minister for peace and reconstruction to encourage accession to the Treaty.[6] The NCBL organized an event in November 2011 to honor former Ministers for Peace and Reconstruction Ram Chandra Paudel and Rakam Chemjong for their efforts to bring about a ban on antipersonnel mines in Nepal. Madhav Kumar Nepal, a former prime minister and a senior Communist Party Nepal-UML leader, joined in the event, at which several political parties signed a commitment against landmines. Nepali Congress leader Ram Chandra Poudel said banning landmines was praiseworthy and added he had helped NGOs in this sector as a Minister for Peace and Reconstruction during his tenure.[7] As of 1 August 2012, 24 of Nepal’s political parties have signed the letter to seek Nepal’s accession.[8]

Production

In December 2009, the Minister for Peace and Reconstruction stated that Nepal does not produce antipersonnel mines.[9] On 21 June 2010, Nepal wrote to the Monitor that “Nepal does not produce any kind of antipersonnel landmines and the landmines that the Nepal Army is using have been produced abroad.”[10] Nepal repeated this in its remarks to States Parties in December 2010 at the Tenth Meeting of States Parties.[11] In light of these official, written declarations that Nepal does not produce antipersonnel mines, the Monitor removed Nepal from its list of producers. Previously, in 2003 and 2005, Nepali officials told the Monitor that Nepal produced antipersonnel mines.[12]

Use, transfer, and stockpiling

In December 2009, the Minister for Peace and Reconstruction stated that Nepal has not planted mines since the end of the insurgency in 2006.[13] He also said that Nepal does not “enable the transfer” of mines. Nepal is not known to have ever exported mines.

During the conflict, the Nepal Army used antipersonnel mines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) assembled in-country around military installations, police posts, and infrastructure. The Nepal Army has stated that it started using mines in 2002 and estimates it deployed around 14,000 antipersonnel mines (including 11,000 PMD-6 mines and 3,000 POMZ-2 and M14 mines). It also estimates that it used about 25,000 command-detonated IEDs.[14] In June 2010, Nepal told the Monitor that it used mines in 53 locations and IEDs in 275 locations during the conflict.[15] In June 2011, Prime Minister Jhalnath Khanal detonated the final mine, ending clearance of the areas mined by the Nepal Army during the civil war. He stated, “Today is a historical day because Nepal has been liberated from all kinds of landmines.”[16]

Nepal wrote to the Monitor in June 2010 that it is now only using antipersonnel mines for training purposes. It stated, “Landmines needed for this purpose have been retained in minimum number,” noting that this is in line with Article 3 of the Mine Ban Treaty.[17] The Nepal Police, Armed Police Forces, and the Nepal Army also retain stocks of IEDs.[18]

A Nepal Army spokesperson said in 2007 that the army had a stockpile of about 3,000 antipersonnel and antivehicle mines, including POMZ-2 and PMD antipersonnel mines. Nepal imported its mines from China, India, and the former Soviet Union, mostly in the 1980s.[19]

Although the former rebel Communist Party of Nepal/Maoist (CPN/M) became a part of the interim government in April 2007, its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) still exists.[20] There have been no reports of new use of antipersonnel mines, victim-activated IEDs, or booby-traps by the PLA since the May 2006 cease-fire. In the past, the PLA was expert at the manufacture and use of a variety of IEDs, including victim-activated, time-delayed, and command-detonated types.[21] Other armed groups continue to operate within the country and to manufacture and use bombs. There is no evidence that any of them have used or possess antipersonnel mines.

 



[1] Statement of Nepal, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Session on Universalization, 2 December 2010.

[2] CPA between Government of Nepal and CPN/M, 21 November 2006, points 5.1.1(i), 5.1.2 and 5.1.4. Earlier, the May 2006 bilateral cease-fire between the government of Nepal and the CPN/M, and accompanying Code of Conduct, committed both sides to discontinuing the use of mines.

[3] Letter from the Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction to the Nepal Campaign to Ban Landmines (NCBL), 23 February 2010. The committee has representation from the ministries of home affairs, foreign affairs, defense, law, and justice, and the NCBL.

[4] Email from Purna Shova Chitrikal, Director, NCBL, 5 August 2012.

[5] An advisor to the prime minister later told the NCBL that the Permanent Mission of Nepal to the UN in New York decides how to vote. Telephone interview with Raghuji Panta, Advisor to the Prime Minister, 23 May 2010.

[6] A frequent change of ministers due to Nepal’s governance crisis has led to a continual introduction of the issue to newly placed government officials. The NCBL launched a letter of commitment to spur Parliamentary action, which pledges political parties to work toward Nepal’s accession to the Treaty. In June 2011, an ICBL delegation met with the ambassador of Nepal in Geneva and urged Nepal to remain engaged with the convention and consider submitting a voluntary Article 7 report.

[7] “Ministers honoured for contribution in banning landmine,” The Himalayan, 11 November 2011, http://bit.ly/N9pmGk.

[8] Nepali Congress, CPN (UML), Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum Nepal, Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum (Democratic), Tarai-Madhesh Loktantrik Party, Tarai-Madhesh Loktantrik Party Nepal, CPN (ML), CPN (ML) – Samajbadi, Sadvawana Party, Rastriya Prajatantra Party, CPN (Samyukta), Rastriya Janamorchha, Rastriya Jana Shakti Party, Nepal Sadvawana Party (Anandadevi), Rastriya Jana Mukti Party, Sanghiye Loktantrik Rastriya Manch, Nepali Janata Dal, Churebhawar Rastriya Yekata Party, Samajwadi Janata Party, Dalit Janajati Party, Nepal Pariwar Dal, Nepa: Rastriya Party, Nepal Loktantrik Samajwadi Dal, and Bam Morchha Nepal.

[9] Statement by Rakam Chemjong, Minister for Peace and Reconstruction, Mine Ban Treaty Second Review Conference, Cartagena, 4 December 2009.

[10] Letter No. GE/2010/576 from Hati Pd. Odari, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Nepal to the UN in Geneva, 21 June 2010.

[11] Statement of Nepal, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Session on Universalization, Geneva, 2 December 2010.

[12] See Landmine Monitor Report 2007, p. 936, and Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 1,022. In 2003, Brig.-Gen. Kul Bahadur Khadka told a visiting ICBL delegation that Nepal produced antipersonnel mines. In August 2005, a former government official told the Monitor that mines were produced at the weapons factory at Sunchari in Makwanpur district south of Kathmandu.

[13] Statement by Rakam Chemjong, Mine Ban Treaty Second Review Conference, Cartagena, 4 December 2009.

[14] See Landmine Monitor Report 2007, pp. 936–937. The Monitor reported indicators of mine use by government forces as early as 1999.

[15] Letter No. GE/2010/576 from Hati Pd. Odari, Permanent Mission of Nepal to the UN in Geneva, 21 June 2010.

[16] “Nepal declared free of mines five years after civil war” BBC, 14 June 2011, www.bbc.co.uk. Nepal continues to clear IED fields laid by the security forces during the civil war.

[17] Letter No. GE/2010/576 from Hati Pd. Odari, Permanent Mission of Nepal to the UN in Geneva, 21 June 2010.

[18] Presentation by DSPBenu Prasad Pathak, Armed Police Force, NCBL Interaction Program, 10 January 2011.

[20] Under the terms of the CPA and the Monitoring of the Management of Arms and Armies agreement, the PLA was cantoned at seven sites and obligated to surrender all IEDs at designated storage locations a safe distance from the sites. Some observers believe some PLA cadres, and their arms, remain outside the UN camps. Shree Ram Dhakal said that all weapons and explosives were handed over to the UN, but that some might have been inadvertently left out. ICBL meeting with Shree Ram Dhakal “Prasanta,” Secretary, CPN/M, Kathmandu, 15 December 2008. Notes by the Monitor.

[21] Presentation by Brig.-Gen. Lok Bahadur Thapa, Nepal Army, “Mine Action in Nepal,” Mine Action and Implications for Peace and Development Conference, Phnom Penh, 12 March 2007.


Last Updated: 26 August 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Republic of Nepal has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Nepal has never made a public statement on its policy on joining the convention. In December 2009, the Minister of Peace and Reconstruction told the CMC that there are no issues preventing the government from acceding to the convention.[1]

Nepal participated in two meetings of the Oslo Process that created the convention (Vienna in December 2007 and Wellington in February 2008), but did not participate in the Dublin negotiations in May 2008 or the Convention on Cluster Munitions Signing Conference in Oslo in December 2008, even as an observer.

Nepal has not participated in any meetings of the Convention on Cluster Munitions since 2008. It was invited to, but did not attend, the Second Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011.

Nepal is not a party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Nepal is not a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Nepal has confirmed that it does not possess cluster munitions and has never used, produced, transferred, or stockpiled cluster munitions.[2]

 



[1] NCBL and CMC interview with Rakam Chemjong, Minister for Peace and Reconstruction, Cartagena, 3 December 2009.

[2] Letter No. GE/2010/577 from Hari Pd. Odari, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Nepal to the UN in Geneva, 21 June 2010; and NCBL and CMC interview with Rakam Chemjong, Cartagena, 3 December 2009.


Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Nepal has been affected by antipersonnel mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) as a result of a decade of conflict that ended with a peace agreement in November 2006. In 2011, it completed clearance of all known mined areas.

Mines

Mine contamination when the conflict ended consisted of 53 fields of antipersonnel mines laid by the Nepal Army around military posts. By the end of 2010, clearance had reduced contamination to 17 minefields covering some 80,000m².[1] In June 2011, Nepal and a senior UN official declared that the last known mined area had been cleared.[2]

Other explosive remnants of war

The decade of conflict also resulted in a problem of ERW, mainly abandoned explosive ordnance and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The Nepal Army, police, and Armed Police Force placed explosive devices, including command-detonated IEDs, as defensive perimeters around military installations. The police and armed police force have already cleared their IED fields. Of 273 IED fields laid by the Nepalese Army that remained at the end of the conflict, six had not been cleared at the end of 2011. These were due for completion in 2012.[3]

Continuing violence in the Terai region of southern Nepal has led to additional IED use and new victims. Humanitarian agencies reported 31 IED casualties in 2011 and estimated that half the casualties were from new devices as distinct from devices left behind by the earlier conflict.[4]

Nepal also has a continuing problem with “socket bombs” (improvised hand-grenades), produced in large quantities by Maoist supporters during the conflict and left over in people’s houses after the conflict ended. Socket bombs accounted for seven of 22 incidents in 2010; these incidents occurred in seven different locations. Other small improvised devices known as “Sutali bombs” and “tiffin box bombs” also cause casualties but there are no records of where they were used.[5]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2012

National Mine Action Authority

Steering Committee for Mine Action, Mine Action Technical Committee

Mine action centers

Mine Action Joint Working Group; Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction Mine Action Office; and Nepal Army Mine Action Coordination Center (NAMACC)

International demining operators

None

National demining operators

NAMACC; Armed Police EOD Team; and Nepal Police EOD Team

International risk education operators

UNICEF

National risk education operators

Armed Police Force, Nepal Police, Nepal Red Cross Society, Nepal Campaign to Ban Landmines, Informal Service Sector Center, and other national NGOs

The Steering Committee for Mine Action and its Mine Action Technical Committee (MATC) serve as the National Mine Action Authority (NMAA). It created a mine action task force chaired by an Undersecretary at the Ministry of Peace & Reconstruction (MoPR) in October 2009 to make recommendations for future mine action. The MoPR issued a draft national mine action plan which received the approval of the MATC, but as of April 2012 it had not been adopted by the Steering Committee. An external evaluation of UN support for mine action in Nepal found that the Steering Committee appeared “moribund.”[6]

The MoPR, on the recommendation of the task force, set up a Mine Action Office in October 2009 to act as a mine action center and government focal point for mine action. The MoPR acts as a conduit for government financing of mine action but its ability to fulfill a wider role has been constrained by lack of capacity.[7] The Nepal Army Mine Action Coordination Center (NAMACC), set up in 2006, fulfills many of the functions of a mine action center, operating as a sub-unit command within the army and maintaining an Information Management System for Mine Action database recording contamination and mine action activities.[8]

Since August 2010, the MoPR has acted as chair of a Mine Action Joint Working Group (MAJWG) supporting operational coordination, especially of mine/ERW risk education (RE) and victim assistance.[9] It includes representatives of the government, security forces, UN agencies, and the ICRC. In April 2012, however, the government official fulfilling that role transferred to another ministry, creating a vacuum in government engagement with mine action.[10]

The UN Mine Action Team (UNMAT) coordinated mine action through MAJWG until August 2010 and later focused on quality assurance. UNMAT ended its activities in July 2011 after the completion of mine clearance.[11]

An evaluation of UN involvement in mine action in Nepal found the mine action activities undertaken by UNMAT and UNICEF were relevant and, in relation to destruction of ordnance stockpiles, “went very well.” It observed that UNMAS support to capacity development of the Nepal Army’s Engineering Brigade was “extremely successful.” It noted the effectiveness of the program was assisted by funding that was both adequate in scale and approved for an extended period. It also found, however, that the UN program had not achieved one of its main aims: the MoPR’s Mine Action Office had not developed into a fully fledged mine action center. It noted the concern of many stakeholders that MoPR had not been sufficiently active in coordinating mine action and might not continue to convene the MAJWG.[12]

Land Release

Nepal started 2011 with 17 minefields to clear covering approximately 80,000m.[13] Nepal Army engineers formally completed the task on 14 June 2011 when Prime Minister Jhalanath Khanal  triggered a controlled detonation of the last mines and the UN declared Nepal mine free.[14] No landmine incidents or discoveries have been reported since then.[15]

Five-year summary of clearance[16]

Year

Mined area cleared (m2)

No. of mined areas cleared

2011

80,000

17

2010

74,836

16

2009

42,045

15

2008

N/R

4

2007

N/R

1

Total

196,881

53

N/R = Not reported

Risk Education

The Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS), the Nepal Campaign to Ban Landmines (NCBL), the Informal Service Sector Center (INSEC), and other national NGOs are active delivering RE to at-risk communities across the country with support from UNICEF. A network of some 430 people acting as focal points providing RE support coordinated by the MAJWG is active in 68 of Nepal’s 75 districts.[17]

The Department of Education, with funding from the Nepal Peace Trust Fund and UNICEF support, trained trainers to provide training for school teachers in the 20 most-affected districts in 2009−2010. This has enabled teachers to deliver a one-class RE session in each school class, reaching over 1,000 schools in 2011. There are plans to broaden the area of RE delivery to include schools in the 30 most-affected districts in 2011−2012 and the 50 most-affected districts in 2012−2013. In addition to this “systematic” RE, NRCS has conducted emergency RE after accidents or where explosive devices have been found; NRCS is working with MoPR on community-based RE programs undertaken by Local Peace Committees in 43 districts.[18]

 



[1] Email from Richard Derieux, Senior Technical Adviser, UNMAT, Kathmandu, 15 February 2011.

[2]Nepal clears last landmine,” Associated Press, 14 June 2011.

[3]Mine Risk Education,” Nepal Red Cross Society and International Committee of the Red Cross, March 2012, p. 12.

[4] Email from Luhar Danee, Child Protection Officer, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 13 August 2012.

[5] Email from Richard Derieux, UNMAT, Kathmandu, 15 February 2011.

[6] Interview with Shaligram Sharma, Under Secretary, Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction, in Geneva, 16 March 2011; Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), April 2012, pp. 23 & 29.

[7] Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” GICHD, April 2012, p. 21.

[8] Interview with Stephen Robinson, Programme Manager, and Mary Sack, Programme Officer, UNMAT, Kathmandu, 22 February 2010; Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” GICHD, April 2012, p. 22.

[9] UNICEF, “Summary Report on UNICEF Mine Action Activities – 2009,” provided by email from Danee Luhar, Child Protection Specialist, UNICEF, 19 May 2010.

[10] Email from Luhar Danee, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 13 August 2012.

[11] Interview with Richard Derieux, UNMAT, in Geneva, 16 March 2011.

[12] Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” GICHD, April 2012, pp. 27−29.

[13] Email from Richard Derieux, UNMAT, Kathmandu, 15 February 2011.

[14]Nepal clears last landmine,” Associated Press, 14 June 2011.

[15] Email from Luhar Danee, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 13 August 2012.

[16] Emails from Richard Derieux, UNMAT, 15 February 2011; and from Mary Sack, UNMAT, 9 April 2010.

[17] Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” GICHD, April 2012, p. 24.

[18] Email from Luhar Danee, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 13 August 2012; and Ted Paterson and Prabin Chitrakar with Abigail Hartley, “Evaluation of the UN Mine Action Programme in Nepal,” GICHD, April 2012, p. 25.


Last Updated: 18 October 2011

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2010

At least 867 mine/ERW casualties (221 killed; 646 injured) since 2005

Casualties in 2010

41 (2009: 70)

2010 casualties by outcome

41 injured (2009: 16 killed; 54 injured)

2010 casualties by device type

2 antipersonnel mines; 5 unknown devices; 34 ERW/IEDs

The Nepali, NGO Informal Service Sector Center (INSEC) recorded 41 mine and explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties in 2010. For the first time in Monitor reporting, there were no fatalities among mine/ERW casualties in Nepal. Of the total casualties, 33 were civilians; the majority of civilian casualties (20, or over 60%) were children (12 boys; eight girls); most adult civilian casualties were women (seven) and six were men. In 2010, for the first time, security personnel were included in INSEC casualty data (seven police; one military personnel). Most casualties (34) occurred in incidents caused by unexploded or abandoned improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which were all recorded as various types of improvised hand grenades.[1] No deminer casualties were reported for 2010.[2]

This represented a significant decrease from the 70 civilian mine/ERW casualties reported by INSEC for 2009,[3] and follows the trend in recent years of a “steady and continuous reduction in the number of incidents and casualties in Nepal.”[4]

The total number of casualties in Nepal remained unknown. The Monitor identified 867 mine/ERW casualties (221 killed; 646 injured) between 2003 and 2010.[5] From 1999 to 2002, the Nepal Campaign to Ban Landmines (NCBL) reported 1,326 casualties (522 killed; 804 injured).[6] However, the NCBL figures were thought to include other conflict casualties.[7]

Victim Assistance

The total number of mine/ERW survivors in Nepal is unknown, but at least 646.

Assessing victim assistance needs

No comprehensive needs assessments were reported for 2010. Handicap International (HI) used INSEC’s casualty surveillance system to assess the needs of survivors, provide assistance, and monitor follow-up.[8] A HI personalized social support project also assessed the needs of individual survivors and persons with disabilities who were beneficiaries.[9] Information provided by INSEC was also used by the UN Mine Action Team (UNMAT) in Nepal to assist strategic and operational planning, including victim assistance.[10] The NCBL collected information on casualties and survivor needs.[11]

Victim assistance coordination[12]

Government coordinating body/focal point

Nepal Mine Action Authority Steering Committee and Technical Committee and its operational arm: the MoPR “Mine Action Section”

Coordinating mechanism

MAJWG

Plan

National Victim Assistance Strategic Framework (inactive)

Throughout 2010, victim assistance continued to be discussed in the meetings of the Mine Action Joint Working Group (MAJWG), an informal working committee that coordinates mine action activities including victim assistance, and includes government and UN agencies, NGOs, and the ICRC. The MAJWG was chaired by UNMAT (UNICEF and the UN Mine Action Service) until August 2010 when the chair role was taken over by the Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction (MoPR). [13] Five meetings were held in 2010.[14]

A five-year National Victim Assistance Strategic Framework was developed with the main victim assistance agencies under the leadership of the MoPR in August 2009. However the strategy was not yet being used as a framework for victim assistance activities by June 2011.[15] Victim assistance stakeholders had resolved to launch a specific Victim Assistance Working Group by November 2009.[16] However this had not eventuated by September 2011.[17]

The Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Population, and the MoPR were responsible for caring for people with disabilities and for the provision of physical rehabilitation. However, most people with disabilities continued to rely on international organizations for regular physical rehabilitation. [18]

Survivor inclusion

No inclusion of survivors in planning or coordination was reported. Survivors were included in the implementation of victim assistance activities such as psychological support and advocacy through the NCBL’s informal National Network of Mine Victims.

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities in 2010[19]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2010

INSEC

National NGO

Data collection, information, immediate response assistance through referral

Ongoing

Himalayan Human Rights Monitors

National NGO

Emergency support including immediate transportation, medical assistance, and psychological support

Unknown

NCBL

National NGO

Scholarships and vocational training for child survivors; psychological support; advocacy for victim assistance funding;  and awareness-raising

Increased services to beneficiaries and awareness-raising activities

HI

International NGO

Support to rehabilitation centers and satellite centers managed by local partners; community-based rehabilitation; personalized social support services for individual beneficiaries

Increased beneficiaries through personalized social support; increased support to the rehabilitation sector through 8 partner organizations and the National Federation of DPOs [disabled persons’ organizations] in Nepal (NFDN)

ICRC

International organization

Support to the prosthetics department of the Green Pasture Hospital, in Pokhara, including treatment and transport costs for beneficiaries and support to the Yerahity Rehabilitation Center in Kathmandu, managed by the Nepal Army (assisting both military and civilians); funding for emergency medical care

Almost doubled the number of prostheses produced compared to 2009 (7% of total for mine/ERW survivors)

UNICEF

UN Agency

Education grant for the most severely affected child survivors and income provided to the most affected families; distribution of handbooks on rights and services for survivors

Increased socioeconomic inclusion activities for child survivors and families affected by mines/ERW; developed and disseminated a handbook for survivors throughout Nepal together with government, HI and the national disabled persons association

In 2011, UNICEF reported that since 2005, almost all mine/ERW survivors, including 300 children, had received adequate and timely medical care and rehabilitation services when needed.[20] In 2009, a mine action evaluation reported that areas of victim assistance other than physical rehabilitation received “little or no attention.”[21] Few significant changes in the availability of other areas of victim assistance were reported, however some new socio-economic inclusion initiatives have been reported since 2009.

No significant improvement in accessibility of emergency medical care was reported. However support to the health sector increased to address increased demand due to a worsened security situation. In 2010, the ICRC provided medical supplies to 17 hospitals to help them cope with an influx of patients following unrest, compared to nine in 2009. ICRC also ran skills training courses for trauma-room specialists from 29 hospitals.[22] Ambulances continued to encounter obstruction and suffer damage during strikes and demonstrations; these services were maintained with ICRC support.[23]  In some cases new mine/ERW survivors who could not be treated in district hospitals could be flown to Kathmandu for emergency medical care.[24]

Although construction of a trauma center at Bir Hospital in Kathmandu was completed in 2008, the much-needed center was still not operational by mid-2011.[25]

The number of prostheses produced at the two ICRC supported centers increased significantly in 2010. This was likely due in large part to the ICRC’s support since 2009 of the Yerahity Rehabilitation Center managed by the Nepal Army.[26] Strong links between HI, the ICRC, and the Nepal Army for providing referrals and information sharing benefited mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities. More generally rehabilitation centers faced challenges with sustainability. HI encouraged the relevant government institutions to take more responsibility for the financing of rehabilitation centers, with a view to eventually phasing out its support of rehabilitation centers.[27] Financial support will gradually be reduced over several years, although managerial and technical support will continue beyond that. The Government and, in particular, the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare has shown a commitment to providing financial support to the existing centers that provide for services for persons with disabilities. Three HI-supported centers received funding from the ministry through June 2011. Similarly the MoPR has responsibility for providing rehabilitation services to victims of conflict.[28]

Psychological assistance was reported to be almost non-existent.[29] This remained true in overall in 2010, however, each community affected by a mine/ERW incident received emergency risk education, including psychological support aspects within a period of about 10 days after the incident.[30] The NCBL continued to provide some informal counseling together with other activities and supported the National Network of Mine Victims, an informal survivor peer support network, but lacked funds to expand the program or adequately identify and engage other survivors.[31] In November 2010, NCBL held an awareness-raising workshop for members of its National Network of Mine Victims and other survivors.  The network had members in 22 of Nepal’s 75 districts and NCBL had facilitators in 46 districts. The workshop included civilian mine/ERW survivors as well as former combatants from the Nepal Army, military police, national police, the non-state armed group People’s Liberation Army and people with disabilities from other causes. This was the first time that all these groups had come together.[32]

There were some newly reported initiatives for the social and economic inclusion of mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities. The Nepal Red Cross Society ran a micro-economic program for victims of the conflict who lost mobility and the International Nepal Fellowship, in conjunction with Partnership for New Life, provided socio-economic inclusion and vocational training programs for people with physical disabilities.[33] UNICEF and its partners provided two-year education grants to 100 child survivors severely affected by mines/ERW. In addition, especially vulnerable families with the most affected child survivors (child survivors having grave or multiple disabilities) received a special grant for a family income-generating project.[34] NCBL reported success in its economic inclusion services for survivors, with nearly all beneficiaries maintaining their employment after a period of support.[35]

MoPR, UNICEF, HI, and the National Federation for Disabled Nepal disseminated a victim assistance handbook throughout Nepal (in 70 districts) to service providers, including health and physical rehabilitation centers, DPOs, human rights groups and Village Development Committees. The handbook was provided together with an orientation session. Monitoring of the handbook’s use indicated that it was used to improve understand what types of services are available, to learn about the rights of survivors, and to advocate for survivors’ rights.[36]

The government Conflict Victim Relief and Rehabilitation Program supports mine/ERW survivors. As part of Nepal’s peace process support program, a revised Procedure on Citizen’s Relief, Compensation and Financial Support was endorsed in 2010 by the MoPR that included specific provisions for mine/ERW survivors. It was not reported what the provisions were, but the procedure is used to allocate services such as health care as well as compensation.[37] However, more generally mine/ERW survivors did not receive adequate recognition of their needs because they represented only a small number of the people who by definition received rights as conflict victims, including many internally displaced persons. Procedures for receiving benefits and services as a mine/ERW survivor with a disability were often prohibitively complicated. These involved registering with two or three different ministries that lacked internal coordination procedures.[38]

Nepal has developed specific policies and laws regarding the rights of persons with disabilities, but most of them were not implemented.[39] Legislation mandates access to employment, education, transportation, and other state services for persons with disabilities. Discrimination against persons with disabilities continued to be reported in all the above areas.[40]

Nepal ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol on 7 May 2010.

 



[1] Casualty data provided by email from Krishna Prasad Subedi, Project Coordinator, Mine Action & Small Arms Surveillance System, INSEC, 10 March 2011.

[2] Email from Richard Derieux, Senior Technical Advisor, UNMAT, 15 February 2011.

[3] Casualty data provided by email from Krishna Prasad Subedi, (then) Head, Human Rights Education Department, INSEC, 1 April 2010.

[4] Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), “Evaluation of UN Mine Action Team in Nepal,” Geneva, 26 June 2009, p. 3.

[5] Casualty figures based on information provided by INSEC, UNICEF, and media reports. However, the data for 2003 and 2004 is only partial, gathered retrospectively by UNICEF from 2005 onwards. From 2006 to the end of 2009 the INSEC database included only civilian casualties.

[6] ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2003: Toward a Mine-Free World (New York: Human Rights Watch, August 2003), www.the-monitor.org; and ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2001: Toward a Mine-Free World (New York: Human Rights Watch, August 2001), www.the-monitor.org.

[7] GICHD, “Evaluation of UN Mine Action Team in Nepal,” Geneva, 26 June 2009, p. 3.

[8] Email from Kiran Wagle, Advocacy Project Manager, HI Nepal, 12 August 2010; and INSEC, “INSEC Surveillance System on Explosive Devices Incidents Report on Casualties of Victim-Activated Explosions Nepal—January–September 2009,” undated but 2009, pp. 21–22.

[9] Interview with from Kiran Wagle, HI Nepal, in Vientiane, 12 November 2010; and presentation by Kiran Wagle, “Victim Assistance Through Personalized Social Support in Nepal,” in Vientiane, 10 November 2010.

[10] GICHD, “Evaluation of UN Mine Action Team in Nepal,” Geneva, 26 June 2009, p. 3.

[11] Interview with Purna Shova Chitrakar, Coordinator, NCBL, in Geneva, 24 June 2010; and Purna Shova Chitrakar, “Economic Reintegration and Rehabilitation of Nepalese Landmine/IED Victims,” Journal of Mine & ERW Action, Issue 14.3, Fall 2010, maic.jmu.edu.

[12] UN, “2010 Portfolio of Mine Action Projects,” New York, November 2009, p. 252; and UN, “Nepal 2010 Transitions Appeal,” p. 50.

[13] Email from Richard Derieux, UNMAT, 15 February 2011.

[14] Email from Hugues Laurenge, Mine Action Project Specialist, UNICEF, 1 September 2011.

[15] Email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 8 July 2011.

[16] Email from Raju Palanchoke, Deputy Project Coordinator, HI, 13 August 2010.

[17] Email from Amina Bomzan, Deputy Country Director, HI, 7 August 2011.

[18] ICRC, Physical Rehabilitation Programme (PRP), “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, June 2011, p. 49.

[19] NCBL, “Strengthening victims and persons with disabilities,” 14 December 2010, nepal.icbl.org; NCBL, “Refresher Training to the Mines and IED victims,” 4 November 2010, nepal.icbl.org; Purna Shova Chitrakar, “Economic Reintegration and Rehabilitation of Nepalese Landmine/IED Victims,” Journal of Mine & ERW Action, Issue 14.3, Fall 2010, maic.jmu.edu; interviews with Purna Shova Chitrakar, NCBL, in Vientiane, 11 November 2010; and  Kiran Wagle, HI Nepal, in Vientiane, 12 November 2010; USAID, “Strengthening Rehabilitation in District Environment (STRIDE),” www.usaid.gov; mail from Amina Bomzan, HI, 7 August 2011; ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 252; ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 214; and email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 1 September 2011.

[20] Email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 8 July 2011.

[21] GICHD, “Evaluation of UN Mine Action Team in Nepal,” Geneva, 26 June 2009, p. 27.

[22] ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 252; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 214.

[23] ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 252.

[24] “Girl injured in army landmine,” Himalayan Times, 11 December 2010, www.thehimalayantimes.com.

[25] “Bring trauma center into operation soon: health secretary,” FN News Network, 28 July 2011, www.nepalrus.com.

[26] ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 252; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 214.

[27] Interview with from Kiran Wagle, HI Nepal, in Vientiane, 12 November 2010.

[28] Email from Amina Bomzan, HI, 7 August 2011.

[29] Dariusz Dziewanski, “Terms of Reference for National Strategic Workshop on Victim Assistance,” HI/UNICEF, 10 July 2009, pp. 2–3.

[30] Email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 1 September 2011.

[31] Interviews with Purna Shova Chitrakar, NCBL, in Geneva, 24 June 2010 and in Vientiane, 11 November 2010.

[32] NCBL, “Refresher Training to the Mines and IED victims,” 4 November 2010, nepal.icbl.org; and interview with Purna Shova Chitrakar, NCBL, in Vientiane, 11 November 2010.

[33] ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, June 2011, p. 50.

[34] Email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 8 July 2011.

[35] Purna Shova Chitrakar, “Economic Reintegration and Rehabilitation of Nepalese Landmine/IED Victims,” Journal of Mine & ERW Action, Issue 14.3, Fall 2010, maic.jmu.edu.

[36] Email from Hugues Laurenge, UNICEF, 8 July 2011.

[37] Ibid.

[38] Interview with from Kiran Wagle, HI Nepal, in Vientiane, 12 November 2010.

[39] ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, June 2011, p. 49.

[40] US Department of State, “2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Nepal,” Washington, DC, 8 April 2011.


Last Updated: 10 September 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

In 2011, Switzerland contributed CHF145,000 (US$163,620) to mine action in Nepal.[1] In June 2011, Nepal reported it had cleared all known mined areas.[2]

In 2007–2011, Australia, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US) contributed a total of US$4.7 million for mine action in Nepal.

Summary of international contributions in 2007–2011[3]

Year

Donors

Amount (US$)

2011

Switzerland

163,620

2010

France, Switzerland, US

913,518

2009

Australia, Canada,  EC

834,789

2008

Australia, Canada, EC, UK

1,051,395

2007

Canada, Denmark

1,756,621

Total

4,719,943

 

 



[1] Switzerland average exchange rate for 2011: CHF0.8862 = US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012. Response to Monitor questionnaire by Claudia Moser, Section for Multilateral Peace Policy, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, 19 June 2012.

[2] UNMAS, “UN Declares Nepal Minefield-Free,” Press release, New York, 16 June 2011.

[3] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Claudia Moser, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, 19 June 2012; ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Nepal: Support for Mine Action,” 18 October 2010; ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Nepal: Support for Mine Action,” 18 August 2011. See previous editions of Landmine Monitor; “2009,” and “2008.”