Pakistan

Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Abstained on Resolution 66/29 in December 2011, as in previous years

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Did not participate in any meetings in 2011 or the first half of 2012

Policy

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. In April 2011, an official from the Pakistan Foreign Office stated that “Pakistan endorses the efforts of European countries in protecting the civilians from the menace of landmines, however, our strategic location and Indian context would not allow us to support the landmine ban treaty.”[1]

Pakistan has previously stated that “Pakistan remains committed to pursue the objectives of a universal and non-discriminatory ban on anti-personnel mines in a manner which takes into account the legitimate defence requirements of States. Given our security compulsions and the need to guard our long borders, not protected by any natural obstacle, the use of landmines forms an important part of our self-defence strategy. As such, it is not possible for Pakistan to agree to the demands for the complete prohibition of anti-personnel landmines till such time that viable alternatives are available.”[2] On the issue of antivehicle mines, Pakistan declared that “AVMs are legitimate defensive weapons and existing provisions of the CCW [Convention on Conventional Weapons] and International Humanitarian Law can address the problems related to their irresponsible use.”[3]

Pakistan has previously stated that CCW Amended Protocol II had the capacity—if fully implemented—to minimize human suffering caused by mines, and that the protocol maintained “a delicate balance” between humanitarian concerns and security imperatives.[4]

Pakistan did not attend any meetings on the mine ban in 2011 or the first half of 2012.

On 2 December 201, Pakistan abstained from voting on UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 66/29 calling for universalization of the Mine Ban Treaty. It has abstained on all previous annual UNGA resolutions in support of the treaty. 

Pakistan is party to the CCW and its Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war. Pakistan submitted a CCW Protocol II Article 13 report in October 2010 covering the period from September 2009 to September 2010, and another one in April 2011 covering the period from September 2010 to December 2010. In November 2010, Pakistan stated that it “is in full compliance with all the requirements of the Amended Protocol II” and that it “has successfully incorporated at appropriate levels all the technical requirements, as mandated by the technical annex of Amended Protocol II.”[5]

Use

Pakistan states that it has not laid mines since the 2001–2002 escalation on the Pakistan-India border.[6] The last confirmed use of antipersonnel mines by Pakistan took place between December 2001 and mid-2002, during an escalation of tensions with India when it laid very large numbers of mines along their shared border.[7] Pakistan also maintains permanent minefields along certain portions of the Line of Control that divides Indian and Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

Pakistan states that antipersonnel mines, antivehicle mines and improvised explosive devices have been used throughout the country, and attributes the use to “terrorists”.[8] The Monitor has registered a large number of casualties in Balochistan, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (formerly the North-West Frontier Province), where the Pakistan army and security forces have been engaged in armed conflict with Pakistani Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and Baloch insurgents. Many of the mines appear to be recently laid as either as a result of conflict between anti-government armed groups or as a result of inter-tribal conflicts. The Monitor has previously reported that there is a perception among local populations that Pakistani forces are laying some mines to defend some military bases and outposts in these conflict areas, however no one could provide the Monitor with specific details and the Monitor has not been able to substantiate the allegations.[9]

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

Pakistan is one of a small number of countries still producing antipersonnel mines.[10] Since January 1997, Pakistan Ordnance Factories has produced detectable versions of hand-laid blast mines in order to be compliant with CCW Amended Protocol II.[11] In 2007, Pakistan reported that it “has also planned incorporation of self-destruct and self-deactivation mechanism in its future production” in order to meet Amended Protocol II requirements.[12] The protocol requires that all remotely-delivered mines have self-destruct and self-deactivation mechanisms. Pakistan reported in 2002 that it was developing a remotely-delivered antipersonnel mine system, but has provided no further details.[13] In 2007, Pakistan also stated that it had “met the deadlines to improve the specifications on detectability of mines” to be compliant with CCW Amended Protocol II.[14]

Pakistan’s Statutory Regulatory Order No. 123 (1) of 25 February 1999 makes the export of antipersonnel mines illegal.[15]The law penalizes importation of mines, but no data is available regarding whether anyone has been arrested or charged under this law. Pakistan states that it has not exported mines “since early 1992.”[16] Recent Article 13 reports state simply that “no manufacturing or trade of landmines is allowed in the Private sectors.”[17]  In the past, the country was a major exporter of mines. Pakistani-made mines have been found in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sri Lanka.

There is no official information available on the size of Pakistan’s antipersonnel mine stockpile. The Monitor has estimated that Pakistan stockpiles at least six million antipersonnel mines, the fifth largest stockpile in the world.[18] Pakistan has neither confirmed nor denied this estimate.

Destruction

During 2011, Pakistan destroyed 153 antipersonnel mines of US and Pakistani design. At least 41 of the destroyed mines were reported to have been confiscated. In what circumstances the other mines were destroyed is not clear.[19] In previous years, Pakistan reported the destruction of “a large number of outdated mines every year,” but had not previously provided information about the quantity or types of mines destroyed.[20]In 2010, Pakistan reported that a total of 43,248 antipersonnel mines (30,615 Mine AP ND P2 Series; 7,014 Mine AP ND P4 Series; 2,884 Mine AP M14; and 2,735 miscellaneous antipersonnel mines) were destroyed between 2000 and 2009.[21] Pakistan reiterated that the mines emplaced along the “Eastern Border have been completely cleared/removed/destroyed” but has not specified when this took place.[22]

 



[1] Monitor interview with Khalil Ur Rehman, Director, Disarmament Division, Pakistan Foreign Office, Islamabad, 9 April 2011.

[2] Pakistan, Explanation of vote on the draft UNGA resolution, A/C.1/62/L.39, 17 October 2007. For similar statements, see Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 973; Landmine Monitor Report 2007, pp. 948–949; and Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 1,039.

[3] Statement by Amb. Amir Akram, Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the UN, Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the CCW, Geneva, 25 November 2010.

[4] Statement of Pakistan, CCW Group of Governmental Experts on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 11 November 2009.

[5] Statement by Bilal Ahmad, First Secretary, Delegation of Pakistan, Twelfth Annual Conference of States Parties to CCW Amended Protocol II, Geneva, 24 November 2010.

[6] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 31 March 2012, http://bit.ly/Nx6LTg.

[7] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 1,087–1,088; and Landmine Monitor Report 2003, p. 661. There were also reports of use of mines by Pakistani troops in Kashmir during the Kargil crisis in mid-1999. See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 1,088. In December 2006, Pakistan stated its intention “to fence and mine some selective sections” of its border with Afghanistan to prevent cross-border militant activity, but did not do so after widespread international criticism. See Landmine Monitor Report 2007, pp. 949–951.

[8] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 31 March 2012, http://bit.ly/Nx6LTg.

[9] See Landmine Monitor Report 2010, also Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 1,057.

[10] Pakistan Ordnance Factories, located in Wah cantonment, is a state-owned company established in 1951 that in the past produced six types of antipersonnel mines, two low-metal blast mines (P2Mk1 and P4Mk2), two bounding fragmentation mines (P3Mk2 and P7Mk1), and two directional fragmentation Claymore-type mines (P5Mk1 and P5Mk2).

[11] Interview with Khalil Ur Rehman, Pakistan Foreign Office, Islamabad, 9 April 2011. See also Article 13 Report, Form C, 2 November 2005; and Sixth Annual Conference of States Parties to CCW Amended Protocol II, “Summary Record of the 1st Meeting, Geneva, 17 November 2004,” Geneva, CCW/AP II/CONF.6/SR.1, 13 May 2005, p. 14.

[12] Article 13 Report (for the period 16 August 2006 to 15 August 2007), Form C.

[14] Article 13 Report (for the period 16 August 2006 to 15 August 2007), Form C. The nine-year deadline for Pakistan to destroy or modify all stockpiled low-metal-content (non-detectable) antipersonnel mines was 3 December 2007. Pakistan provided no details about how or when it met the requirement.

[15] Article 13 Report, Form D, 10 November 2006 states, “Pakistan has declared a complete ban on export of landmines, even to States Parties, with effect from March 1997.”

[16] Interview with Khalil Ur Rehman, Pakistan Foreign Office, Islamabad, 9 April 2011; and interview with Muhammad Kamran Akhtar, Director, Disarmament Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamabad, 23 April 2009. See also Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 725.

[17] Article 13 Report, Form D, 1 April 2011

[18] See Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 1,058, footnote 17.

[19] Article 13 Report, Form F, 31 March 2012, http://bit.ly/Nx6LTg. Fifty-one were US M14 and M2A4 mine designs. Fifty-four were Pakistani P2, P3 and P5 mine designs.

[20] Article 13 Report (for the period 16 August 2006 to 15 August 2007), Form B. It is unclear if Pakistan has continued to destroy mines, as it has not provided new information since 2007.

[21] Article 13 Report, Form F, 25 October 2010.

[22] Article 13 Report, Form B, 31 March 2012, http://bit.ly/Nx6LTg.


Last Updated: 09 August 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

In November 2011, Pakistan repeated its long-held view that cluster munitions are legitimate weapons with military utility, but said it “recognizes the serious humanitarian consequences stemming from the indiscriminate use of cluster munitions and as such welcomed efforts to mitigate their negative consequences.”[1]Pakistan has also stated that it is opposed the use of cluster munitions against civilians.[2]

Pakistan has argued that the problem with cluster munitions is not the weapon itself, but its “irresponsible use.”[3]In 2009, a government official said that “in view of Pakistan’s security environment and legitimate defence needs, we do not support a ban on use, production, and transfer of cluster munitions due to their military utility.”[4]

Pakistan has long expressed its preference for cluster munitions to be addressed through the framework of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and not through “extra-UN mechanisms” such as the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[5]

Pakistan did not participate in the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitionsand has not attended any of the regional or international diplomatic meetings related to the convention, including in 2011 and the first half of 2012.[6]

Pakistan is not a party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Convention on Conventional Weapons

Pakistan is a party to the CCW and it actively participated in CCW work on cluster munitions, urging CCW states to “focus on the irresponsible use and transfer of cluster munitions.”[7]At the CCW's Fourth Review Conference in November 2011, Pakistan was generally in favor of the conclusion of a protocol on cluster munitions, but waivered in its support for the draft chair’s text, which it largely perceived to be too strong.The conference ended without reaching agreement on the draft protocol, thus concluding the CCW’s work on cluster munitions.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Pakistan has often stated that it has never used cluster munitions.[8]

Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) produces and offers for export M483A1 155mm artillery projectiles containing 88 M42/M46 dual purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) grenades.[9] The South Korean company Poongsan entered into a licensed production agreement with POF in November 2004 to co-produce K-310 155mm extended-range DPICM projectiles in Pakistan at Wah Cantonment. While the ammunition is being produced for Pakistan’s army, the two firms have said they will also co-market the projectiles to export customers.[10] The Pakistani army took delivery of the first production lots in April 2008.[11]

Jane’s Information Group reports that the Pakistan Air Weapons Center produces the Programmable Submunitions Dispenser (PSD-1), which is similar to the United States (US) Rockeye cluster bomb and dispenses 225 anti-armor submunitions.[12] Jane’s states that the Pakistan National Development Complex produces and markets the Hijara Top-Attack Submunitions Dispenser (TSD-1) cluster bomb.[13] It lists Pakistan’s Air Force as possessing BL-755 cluster bombs.[14] The US transferred to Pakistan 200 Rockeye cluster bombs at some point between 1970 and 1995.[15]

Pakistan has a long-standing export moratorium on antipersonnel landmines, but it does not have any similar measures in place to curb exports of cluster munitions.[16]

On 15 September 2011, the London-based arms expo Defence& Security Equipment international (DSEi) permanently closed the Pakistan Ordnance Factory stand and Pakistan’s Defence Export Promotion Organisation pavilion after promotional material was found at both locations listing cluster munitions available for sale, including the 155mm extended range (base bleed) DPICM projectiles containing 45 submunitions and the 155mm M483A1 cluster munition containing 88 submunitions, both manufactured by POF.[17] Pakistani authorities reportedly stated that cluster munitions were not offered for sale by Pakistan at DSEi.[18]Similar concerns were raised during the 2009 DSEi arms fair, when Pakistan Ordnance Factory was found to be advertising the 155mm extended range (base bleed)DPICM cluster munition.[19]

In a 13 October 2011 letter to Prime Minister YousufRazaGilani, Human Rights Watch urged Pakistan to join the Convention on Cluster Munitions and, as an interim step towards acceding, urged Pakistan to “abide by the spirit and intent” of the convention’s provisions, “including by instituting a prohibition on the transfer of cluster munitions manufactured by Pakistan Ordnance Factory and any other Pakistani entities.”[20]

 



[1]Statement of Pakistan.CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 15 November 2011,http://bit.ly/Jcbvz9.

[2]Statement of Pakistan, CCW Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 25 November 2010.Notes by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV); Statement of Pakistan, CCW Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 12 November 2009.Notes by Landmine Action.

[3] Statement of Pakistan, CCW Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 30 August 2010.

[4] Letter from Dr. Irfan Yusuf Shami, Director General for Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 February 2009.

[5]Pakistan, Explanation of Vote on UN General Assembly First Committee draft resolution A/C.1/63/L.56, “Convention on Cluster Munitions,” (UNGA 63/71), 63rd Session, 30 October 2008.

[6] For more details on Pakistan’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice(Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 225–226.

[7]Statement of Pakistan, CCW GGE on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 17 April 2009, notes by Landmine Action; and Statement of Pakistan, CCW GGE on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 12 April 2010, notes by AOAV. In 2008, Pakistan said that “the cost of destroying current stocks of cluster munitions and moving to newer technologies would be huge.” Statement by Amb.Masood Khan, Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the Conference of Disarmament, CCW GGE on Cluster Munitions, Geneva, 14 January 2008.

[8]Statement of Pakistan, CCW Fourth Review Conference, 15 November 2011,http://bit.ly/Jcbvz9.Statement by Amb. Khan, CCW Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 7 November 2007; Statement of Pakistan, CCW Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 12 November 2009. Notes by Landmine Action; and 25 November 2010.Notes by AOAV.

[9]POF, “Products, Ordnance, Artillery Ammunition, 155mm HOW HE M483A1-ICM,” www.pof.gov.pk.

[10] “Pakistan Ordnance Factory, S. Korean Firms Sign Ammunition Pact,” Asia Pulse (Karachi), 24 November 2006.

[11] “Pak Army Gets First Lot of DPICM Ammunition,” PakTribune, 13 April 2008, www.paktribune.com.

[12] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 389.

[13] Ibid.

[14]Ibid, p. 843. BL-755s are manufactured by the United Kingdom (UK).

[15]US Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense, “Cluster Bomb Exports under FMS, FY1970–FY1995,” 15 November 1995, obtained by HRW in a Freedom of Information Act request, 28 November 1995.

[16]Pakistan announced a comprehensive moratorium of unlimited duration on the export of antipersonnel landmines in March 1997 that was strengthened after the adoption of the Mine Ban Treaty with a February 1999 regulation making the export of antipersonnel mines illegal.

[17] The UK is a State Party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions so the references to equipment were found to breach UK Government Export Controls and DSEi’s contractual requirements.

[18] Saba Imtiaz, “London exhibition controversy: Pakistan says no brochures listed cluster munitions,” The Express Tribune, 21 September 2011,http://tribune.com.pk/story/256773/london-exhibition-controversy-pakistan-says-no-brochures-listed-cluster-munitions/.

[19]“Evidence submitted by the UK Working Group on Arms (UKWG),” Strategic Export Controls (UK Parliament), November 2010,http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmquad/writev/arms/m5.htm.

[20]Letter to Prime Minister YousufRazaGilani from Steve Goose, Arms Division, and Brad Adams, Asia Division, HRW, 13 October 2011,http://bit.ly/KjUjnr.


Last Updated: 02 November 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Pakistan remains affected by landmines and other ordnance from the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan (1979–1989) and three wars with India, but more recent and continuing conflicts areas bordering Afghanistan have added ERW contamination, including mines, items of unexploded explosive ordnance (UXO), and improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Mines

Pakistan asserts that it “faces no problem of uncleared mines.” In supporting this statement, it acknowledges that the army laid mines on its eastern border with India during an escalation of tensions in 2001−2002 but says those mines were all cleared and the army has not laid any more since then. However, the report goes on to record 2,098 IED attacks in 2011 “including” antipersonnel mines and antivehicle mines. It said 1,200 of these had detonated, causing casualties. It also reported continued mine clearance by army engineers.[1]

Pakistan’s 2007 Amended Protocol II Article 13 report acknowledged that mines were encountered on the border with Afghanistan “but these are mines left by the former Soviet troops.”[2] During their occupation of Afghanistan, troops of the former Soviet Union scattered mines along the border from helicopters, some of them landing in Pakistani territory. In addition, the mujahideen used mines to protect their bases in the tribal areas.[3]

More recent conflict between the government and non-state armed groups in tribal areas reportedly resulted in new mine use. The Taliban reportedly used mines in the Swat Valley in 2009 to block government troops. Reports from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) bordering Afghanistan indicate continued use of landmines in 2010 as an offensive weapon in tribal and sectarian conflicts.[4]

Despite government claims that it had cleared the mines it laid on the Indo-Pakistan border in 2001–2002 and that “minefields laid along the Line of Control are properly fenced and clearly marked,”[5] inhabitants of Pakistani-administered Kashmir report consistently that some areas along the Line of Control are still contaminated and have not been properly fenced by the militaries of either India or Pakistan.[6] Inhabitants of Garhi Sher Khan in Poonch district, for example, informed the Monitor that villages on both sides of the Line of Control were contaminated by mines and ERW, and that rainfall caused mines to drift onto the Pakistani side of the border from higher areas on the Indian side.[7]

Cluster munition remnants and other explosive remnants of war

The transparency report Pakistan submitted in March 2011 under Article 10 of CCW Protocol V said there were no explosive remnants of war (ERW) in Pakistan.[8] Its latest Article 13 Report, however, claimed “terrorists” had used IEDs to attack the government and civilians, mounting 4,570 attacks between 2000 and the end of 2010 and causing 3,665 casualties in 2010 alone, including 992 people killed.[9]

NGOs operating in northwestern districts report an ERW threat to communities from UXO, including mortars, artillery shells, hand-grenades, IEDs, and rocket-propelled grenades.[10] It is not known whether contamination includes cluster munition remnants.

Mine Action Program

Pakistan has no formal civilian mine action program. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed the Monitor in April 2011 that it planned to establish a mine action facility to provide information, mine/ERW risk education (RE), and victim assistance services to the conflict-affected population. However, the ministry said that, due to lack of resources, the program could not be started yet.[11] The ministry had previously disclosed plans to establish a Training Center for Demining and Awareness in 2007 to act as a mine action center for operations in Pakistan and overseas, but that initiative has also not progressed.[12]

An Inter Services Public Relations representative told the Monitor that Pakistani military engineering units are responsible for mine clearance in contaminated conflict zones.[13] The Frontier Constabulary (FC) also says it conducts mine clearance in contaminated areas of Balochistan, FATA, and other conflict zones in the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP). The army provided clearance training and mine detectors to the FC.[14]

Mine clearance in 2011

The army and FC do not release details of their demining activities. In its latest Amended Protocol II Article 13 report, Pakistan said its army destroyed 153 antipersonnel mines during 2011, identifying mine types but providing no details concerning their locations.[15]

Risk Education

Pakistan has no formal risk education (RE) program. Since 2009, UNICEF has supported the Pakistani NGO Sustainable Peace and Development Organization (SPADO) and other organizations in developing and implementing RE activities, focusing particularly on internally displaced people in conflict-affected areas in the northwest. In 2010−2011, UNICEF co-chaired a MRE (Mine Risk Education) Working Group. After an initial training jointly conducted by UNICEF and Handicap International, NGOs received technical assistance through a coordination mechanism that meets monthly. The project has included the development of RE materials.[16]

Mines Advisory Group, working in partnership with SPADO, delivered RE in 2011 to people affected by conflict in South Waziristan and in the Orakzai and Kurram agencies. MAG worked through two field offices in central Khyber Pakhtunkwa (Kohat) and in southern Khyber Pakhtunkwa (DI Khan). It delivered direct RE training to community focal points; these focal points in turn facilitated access to schools, madrassas, community centers, and homes. However, the program ended in January 2012 due to lack of donor funding.[17]

The Swiss Foundation for Demining (FSD) also conducted community-based RE operating in four districts of Buner, Dir, Shangla, and Swat;[18] from December 2010, in partnership with the Peshawar-based NGO BEST, it expanded the geographic scope of its operations to include the FATA agencies of Bajaur and Mohmand, as well as the displaced populations from Bajaur and Khyber in Peshawar’s Polzai camp.[19] FSD’s project also terminated at the start of 2012 when ECHO funding stopped.[20]

 



[1] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for calendar year 2011), Forms B and F.

[2] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for the period 16 August 2006 to 15 August 2007), Form B.

[3] Letter from Joint Staff Headquarters, Strategic Plans Division, Arms Control and Disarmament Affairs Directorate, Chaklala cantonment, 14 February 2002; and Naveed Ahmad Shinwari and Salma Malik, “Situation Analysis of [small arms and light weapons] SALW in Pakistan and its Impact on Security,” Research paper, Community Appraisal and Motivation Program, Peshawar, February 2005, p. 13.

[4] “Pakistan: Landmines and UXOs continue to endanger life in isolated tribal belt,” IRIN, 8 June 2010, www.irinnews.org.

[5] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form A, 10 November 2006.

[6] Monitor field research in Muzaffarabad, Kashmir, March 2011, 24–26 March 2010, 22–24 April 2009, 16–19 April 2008, 20–23 March 2007, and 21–23 February 2006.

[7] Monitor field research in Muzaffarabad; and interviews with local inhabitants of Garhi Sher Khan, Poonch district, Pakistani-administered Kashmir, including the communities of Boon Colony, Chai, Chakrali, Daliry, Dossi, Jamotra, Japak, Khapar Gala, Kota, and Nala, March 2011, March 2010, and March 2007.

[8] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report (for the period 1 March 2010 to 31 December 2010), Form C.

[9] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for the period 10 September 2010 to 31 December 2010), Form B.

[10] Telephone interview with Dan Bridges, Program Manager, Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD), 10 June 2010.

[11] Interview with Khalil Ur Rehman, Director, Disarmament Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamabad, 9 April 2011.

[12] Interviews with Muhammad Kamran Akhtar, then-Director, Disarmament Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamabad, 23 April 2009 and 10 April 2007.

[13] Interview with Brig. Azmat Ali, Spokesman, Inter Services Public Relations, Peshawar, 22 March 2010.

[14] Interview with Sifat Ghayur, Inspector General, FC, Peshawar, 19 March 2010.

[15] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report for calendar year 2011, Form F.

[16] Telephone interview with, and email from, Elizabeth Cosser, Child Protection Specialist, UNICEF Pakistan, 16 October 2012; and email from Sharif Baaser, Program Specialist, Mine Action and Small Arms, Child Protection, UNICEF, 18 June 2010.

[17] “Pakistan: Problem statement,” MAG, November 2011; email from Nina Seecharan, Desk Officer, MAG, 4 October 2012.

[18] Telephone interview with Dan Bridges, FSD, 10 June 2010.

[19] Email from Frederic Martin, Program Manager, FSD, Pakistan, 13 August 2011.

[20] Telephone interview with Ben Truniger, Deputy Secretary General, FSD, 11 October 2012.


Last Updated: 29 November 2012

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2011

3,353 (1,233 killed; 2,025 injured; 95 unknown)

Casualties in 2011

569 (2010: 394)

2011 casualties by outcome

208 killed; 361 injured (2010:108 killed; 286 injured)

2011 casualties by item type

132 antipersonnel mines; 293 antivehicle mines; 73 victim-activated IEDs; 52 other ERW; 19 unknown items

In 2011, the Monitor identified 569 casualties from antipersonnel mines, antivehicle mines, victim-activated improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and other explosive remnants of war (ERW) in Pakistan.[1] There were 332 civilian casualties including 213 men, 20 women, and 99 children (75 boys and 24 girls). The remaining 237 casualties were security forces; at over 40% of the total, this was similar to the 46% reported in 2010 and a significant increase from 2009 when security forces made up 25% of all reported casualties. The ongoing violence in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK, formerly North-West Frontier Province) and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) continued to be seen as the cause of high numbers of casualties.[2]

The 2011 casualty total represented a significant increase from the 394 mine/ERW casualties indentified in 2010. Given the considerable variation in available annual casualty data, it is not possible to be certain of the extent to which changes in recorded casualties are indicative of actual trends versus shifts in media coverage and use of terminology.[3]

The vast majority of casualties in 2010 (542) occurred in FATA (288), Balochistan (166), and KPK (88). The number of casualties in these areas increased significantly in 2011 compared to 2010 (368); the greatest rise was in Balochistan, which had 64 casualties in 2010.

Pakistan had 293 reported casualties from antivehicle mines in 2011. This number was higher than the previous peak of 249 antivehicle-mine casualties recorded for 2006; at that time, “Antivehicle mines posed the greatest threat to both civilians and military personnel,” the Monitor reported. The 2011 total was more than three times the 91 antivehicle casualties identified in 2010. Reporting of victim-activated IED incidents was down from 2010, when victim-activated IEDs caused more than half of all casualties, a percentage that had been increasing since at least 2007.[4]

The total number of casualties in Pakistan is not known, and there has been no official data collection mechanism. In 2011 reporting, the government reiterated that there were no mine or ERW casualties in Pakistan, as it had in previous years.[5] However, between 1999 and 2011, the Monitor identified at least 3,353 casualties (1,233 killed, 2,025 injured, 95 unknown) from victim-activated explosive items, including landmines and ERW, through media monitoring, field visits, and information provided by service providers.[6] It is likely that the total number of casualties is much higher. Pakistan reported on 1,200 “IED attacks” causing casualties in 2011, “including” antipersonnel mines and antivehicle mines.[7]

Victim Assistance

The Monitor has identified 2,025 mine/ERW survivors in Pakistan since 1999.

Victim assistance since 1999[8]

Pakistan has not had specific programs or a strategic plan to address the needs of mine/ERW/IED survivors. While Pakistan has asserted that mine/ERW/IED survivors “are properly looked after,” most survivors live in poor, conflict-affected regions with limited access to services. Pakistan has legislation which protects the equality of persons with disabilities but enforcement is lacking.

Victim assistance in 2011

In 2011, continuing military and security operations (particularly in KPK and the FATA) as well as other armed violence (which also occurred in Balochistan) impeded civilian survivors’ access to essential services, particularly emergency medical care. Physical rehabilitation services improved and increased.

Assessing victim assistance needs

National NGOs, including Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP) and Sustainable Peace and Development Organization (SPADO), collected information on casualties and survivors as part of their broader program activities.

Response International maintained a database of casualties and undertook a two-year casualty survey linked with risk education (RE) activities in Swat Valley covering half the resident population (approximated 500,000 people). The survey finished in November 2011.[9]

It was reported that a government plan for enhancing physical rehabilitation services and vocational training being developed in 2012 would begin with data collection on the needs of people injured in conflict in the FATA and the KPK province.[10]

Victim assistance coordination

Pakistan continued to report that the Military Operations Directorate of the Pakistan Army was the focal point for victim assistance, but did not indicate if this was for both civilian and military survivors.[11] Several ministries were involved in disability issues, including the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Social Welfare and Special Education.[12] As of the end of 2011, Pakistan had no victim assistance plan; its National Policy for Persons with Disabilities 2002-2025 remained in place. After dissolution of the Ministry of Social Welfare and Special Education in April 2011, its affiliated departments, including the National Council for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled and the National Trust for the Disabled, were handed over to the Capital Administration and Development Division of Medical Science (PIMS) in Islamabad.[13]

Pakistan reported that a “deliberate procedure/programme is in place” for the victims of IEDs. This was reported to be individual rehabilitation programs including emergency and ongoing medical care and physical rehabilitation at army medical units and hospitals, as well as economic reintegration through monetary compensation and employment. It was not reported if civilians could access these services.[14]

Pakistan provided contact information on victim assistance coordination in its Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol V Article 10 report and did not update information on victim assistance available in its CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 report.[15]

Survivor participation and inclusion

No information was available about mine/ERW survivors being included in government coordination, implementation, or monitoring of disability plans.

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities[16]

Type of organization

Name of organization

Type of activity

National Military Rehabilitation Center

Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine (AFIRM)

Physical rehabilitation for members of the military

National University in Physical Rehabilitation

Institute of Prosthetic and Orthotic Sciences (PIPOS)

Physical rehabilitation throughout the country; (ICRC provided equipment, materials and training)

Regional hospital

 

Bolan Medical Complex Quetta, Balochistan

Physiotherapy Services for persons with disabilities

Christian Hospital Rehabilitation Centre

Medical care and physical rehabilitation in Balochistan; (ICRC provided materials and training)

Hayat Shaheed Teaching Hospital

Medical care and physical rehabilitation in Peshawar

Lady Reading Hospital

Physical rehabilitation in Peshawar

Muzaffarabad Physical Rehabilitation Centre

Physical rehabilitation in Kashmir (ICRC provided materials and training; and small grants and business training program with the ICRC)

National NGO

Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)

Disability resource center, emergency health care, and advocacy

Human Development and Promotional Group

Providing prostheses to child mine/ERW survivors in Bajour, FATA

Sustainable Peace and Development Organization (SPADO)

Advocacy for victim assistance; referrals to services in FATA and KP; maintained comprehensive casualty database

International NGO

 

Handicap International (HI)

Emergency relief; mobility devices and disability access in internally displaced persons camps in FATA and the NWFP

Helping Hand for Relief and Development (HHRD)

Physical rehabilitation in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir and in Swat and Buner, KP

Leonard Cheshire Disability (LCD)

Counseling, rehabilitation, and economic inclusion programs; disability advocacy; gender equal programming

Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF)

Emergency and ongoing medical care in KP, FATA, and Balochistan

Response International (RI)

Victim assistance projects in FATA, Kashmir and Swat Valley

International organization

ICRC

Emergency relief, strengthening of emergency and ongoing medical care; support for physical rehabilitation at two rehabilitation centers and through three branches of PIPOS; and small grants and business training

Ongoing violence throughout 2011, mostly in northern Pakistan, and higher annual casualties from mines/ERW and other weapons increased the demand for victim assistance. ICRC reported that access was severely hampered due to violence and insecurity, or due to related government restrictions and security measures which limited the ICRC’s ability to provide assistance to the civilian population. Insecurity, displacement and natural disaster prevented many civilians, including those in Balochistan, KP and FATA, from reaching services.[17] In addition, many people with disabilities were reportedly unaware of services available at government hospitals and orthotic workshops.[18]

The ICRC contributed to the medical care of 124 survivors of mines or ERW in 2011, with more than 8,700 weapon-wounded patients treated in its hospital in Peshawar or through support to other hospitals. A visiting ICRC reconstructive surgeon treated patients disfigured by weapon wounds.[19] The Pakistani government had a medical support plan that detailed the emergency medical evacuation of casualties from mines/IEDs and ERW to army medical units and field hospitals in the affected areas.[20] Pakistan reported that these services were “adequate.”[21] Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF) found that low standards of equipment and hygiene in hospitals in affected areas negatively impacted the quality of services.[22] Despite the security situation, in 2011 MSF continued to provide emergency and surgical care at a new emergency medical department in Hangu district of KPK, which opened in 2010.[23] In 2011, MSF provided emergency medical care including surgery to thousands of patients in hospitals in Dargai and Timurgara in KPK and in Hangu very near the Afghan border. MSF also provided emergency care in the district hospital of Chaman, Balochistan province, a town on the border with Afghanistan where Afghans affected by conflict often seek medical assistance.[24]

In 2011, there were almost 40% more mine/ERW survivors receiving prosthetics (720 of 2,005 total beneficiaries) in ICRC-supported rehabilitation centers as compared to 2010 (517 of 1,386 total beneficiaries). In 2010, there had been a 90% increase in the number of mine/ERW survivors receiving prosthetics compared to the number in 2009. The ICRC attributed the increase to enhanced support to physical rehabilitation centers and improvements in the referral system and staff skills combined with a greater public trust in the services.[25] Rehabilitation services for military survivors of mines/IEDs and ERW were available through army hospitals. Complicated cases were referred to the Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine (AFIRM).[26]

Few psychological support and economic inclusion programs were available in Pakistan.

The ICRC continued providing small grants and business training through the Muzaffarabad Physical Rehabilitation Center. Discussions regarding the handover of the running of the Muzaffarabad center to the Ministry of Health continued in 2011.[27]

According to the Pakistani government, IED survivors were provided with monetary compensation, employment, and commercial or agricultural property. No figures were provided on the number of survivors who received this assistance, or if any were civilian.[28]

The government declared the federal capital and provincial capitals as “disabled-friendly cities.” Special education centers were established in main cities. Employment quotas for persons with disabilities lacked adequate enforcement mechanisms. Organizations that refused to hire persons with disabilities could choose to pay a fine to a disability assistance fund. The National Council for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled provided job placement and loan facilities as well as subsistence funding. However, most individuals with disabilities were supported by their families.[29] The law provides for equality of the rights of persons with disabilities, but not all provisions were implemented in practice.[30]

The ICRC promoted equal access to all assisted centers through several activities such as increasing the number of women professionals and providing healthcare and dormitory areas for women.[31]

Pakistan ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 5 July 2011.

 



[1] Monitor casualty analysis based on data provided by Sustainable Peace and Development Organization (SPADO) media monitoring, 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011.

[2] ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 256.

[3] While efforts have been made to increase sources of casualty data, the media remains the main source of data and sporadic reporting of the incidents, along with remoteness and security situation of the areas where such incidents took place, make it likely that casualties continue to be underreported.

[4] Prior to 2007, casualties from victim-activated IEDs were not systematically separated from those caused by command-detonated IEDs in the data making it difficult to draw accurate comparisons. For details, see previous ICBL, “Country Profiles: Pakistan,” www.the-monitor.org.  

[5] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for calendar year 2011), Form B, 31 March 2012; CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form C, 15 March 2011; and Article 10 Report, Form C, April 2010; CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for the period 16 August 2006 to 15 August 2007); and CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Reports, Form B, 10 November 2006, 2 November 2005, and 8 October 2004.

[6] For details, see previous ICBL, “Country Profiles: Pakistan,” www.the-monitor.org.

[7] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report (for calendar year 2011), Form B.

[8] For details, see previous ICBL, “Country Profiles: Pakistan,” www.the-monitor.org.

[9] Email from Philip Garvin, CEO, Response International, 17 March 2012.

[10] Ashfaq Yusufzai, “Pakistan: New Rehab Plan Brings Hope for War-Disabled,” 28 January 2012, www.ipsnews.net/2012/01/pakistan-new-rehab-plan-brings-hope-for-war-disabled/.

[11] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form C, 31 March 2012.

[12] ICRC Physical Rehabilitation Programme, (PRP) “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 58.

[13] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Pakistan,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[14] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 1 April 2011.

[15] CCW Protocol V Article 10 Report, Form C, 31March 2012; and CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 31 March 2012.

[16] There are hundreds of service providers (most of which are public or private health or rehabilitation centers) delivering assistance to persons with disabilities in Pakistan. The organizations listed here have reported having provided some assistance to mine/ERW/IED survivors or working in affected areas. ICRC, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012; Geneva; ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” May 2011, Geneva, pp. 254–260; ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012; ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2010,” Geneva, June 2011; Khyber Medical University, www.kmu.edu.pk; Pakistan Institute of Prosthetic and Orthotic Sciences (PIPOS), www.pipos.org.pk; Bolan Medical Complex (College), www.bmc.edu.pk; Helping Hand for Relief and Development (HHRD), www.hhrd.org; Email from Philip Garvin, Response International, 17 March 2012; Camp, www.camp.org.pk/camp-ongoing-projects.php; SPADO, www.spado.org.pk; Response International, “Pakistan Project,” www.responseinternational.org.uk/project_pakistan_list.htm; and HI, www.handicap-international.fr/.

[17] ICRC, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 235.

[18] Ashfaq Yusufzai, “Pakistan: New Rehab Plan Brings Hope for War-Disabled,” 28 January 2012, www.ipsnews.net/2012/01/pakistan-new-rehab-plan-brings-hope-for-war-disabled/.

[19] ICRC, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, pp. 235–236.

[20] Article 13 Report, Form B, 1 April 2011; Article 13 Report, Form B, 31 March 2012 (no change).

[21] Ibid.

[22] MSF, “International Activity Report 2010 – Pakistan,” 2 August 2011, www.msf.org.

[23] MSF, “Pakistan: In 2011, MSF provided medical care to 20,440 patients in Hangu,” 5 January 2012, www.msf.org/msf/articles/2012/01/in-2011-mdecins-sans-frontires-msf-provided-medical-care-to-20440-patients-in-hangu.cfm; and MSF, “International Activity Report 2010 – Pakistan,” 2 August 2011, www.msf.org.

[24] MSF, “Focus on Pakistan: Activities 2011 Emergency care,” www.msf.org.uk/pakistan.focus.

[25] ICRC, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, pp. 235–236; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2010,” May 2011, Geneva, pp. 254–260.

[26] Rick Westhead, “Wounded Pakistani soldiers fighting for attention,” The Star (Rawalpindi), 6 March 2011, www.thestar.com.

[27] ICRC, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 236.

[28] Article 13 Report, Form B, 1 April 2011.

[29] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Pakistan,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[30] Ibid.

[31] ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 58.


Last Updated: 10 September 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

Pakistan is affected by mines and other ordnance from the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan (1979–1989) and three wars with India. Areas bordering Afghanistan, however, are affected by a variety of contamination from more recent and continuing conflict, including not only mines, but also unexploded ordnance (UXO) and improvised explosive devices (IEDs).[1]

In 2011, the European Commission (EC) provided Handicap International with €247,955 (US$345,426) for risk education (RE).[2] Since 2009, the EC has contributed €3,214,230 (US$4,364,350) to RE projects in Pakistan. All international contributions toward mine action in Pakistan since 2009 went towards RE.

Summary of international contributions in 2009–2011[3]

Year

Donors

Amount (US$)

2011

EC

345,426

2010

EC, Japan, US

3,357,471

2009

EC, Sweden, UNICEF

1,848,483

Total

5,551,380

 

 



[1] See ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Pakistan: Mine Action,” 2012.

[2] Email from Carolin J. Thielking, Directorate for Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, European External Action Service, European Commission, 15 April 2012. Euro average exchange rate for 2011: €1 = US$1.3931. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012.

[3] See ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Pakistan: Support for Mine Action,” 27 July 2010; and “Country Profile: Pakistan: Support for Mine Action,” 24 August 2011. Email from Farman Ali, Child Protection Officer, UNICEF, 16 August 2011.