Peru

Last Updated: 31 October 2011

Mine Ban Policy

Commitment to the Mine Ban Treaty

Mine Ban Treaty status

State Party

National implementation measures

Law No. 28824 enacted on 22 July 2006

Transparency reporting

16 May 2011

Policy

The Republic of Peru signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified on 17 June 1998, becoming a State Party on 1 March 1999. Peru enacted domestic legislation to penalize violations of the Mine Ban Treaty on 22 July 2006.[1]

On 16 May 2011, Peru submitted its 12th Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report, for the period from March 2010 to March 2011.

Peru attended the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2011.

Peru served as co-chair of the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration in 2010, and as co-rapporteur of the Standing Committee on the General Status and Operations of the Convention in 2011.

Peru is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended Protocol II on landmines.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and retention

Peru is a former producer of antipersonnel mines.[2] The Ministry of Defense has stated that Peru has never exported antipersonnel mines.[3] Peru used antipersonnel mines around its electricity towers and public infrastructure during and after the internal conflict of 1980–1992.[4]

Peru destroyed its stockpile of 338,356 antipersonnel mines between 1999 and December 2001.[5]

In May 2011, Peru reported that it retained 2,040 antipersonnel mines for training purposes, which is 2,050 fewer mines than previously reported.[6] In April 2010, Peru reported a total of 4,090 mines: 2,060 antipersonnel mines for training purposes and 2,030 mines retained for training that had been transferred for use “in the education and training of military personnel in basic and new techniques for demining.”[7] In 2009, Peru reported a total of 4,047 mines retained for training purposes.[8]  Peru did not report in any detail on the intended purpose and actual use of its retained mines.

Use

Since early 2007, remnants of the non-state armed group Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso) have reportedly used victim-activated explosive devices, referred to as “explosive traps.”[9] Victim-activated improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are prohibited by the Mine Ban Treaty.

In November 2010, local media reported that police had found 25 mines or explosive booby traps that it attributed to the Shining Path.[10] In June 2010, media reported that a Peruvian soldier lost his leg after stepping on a mine while on patrol near the perimeter of the Cerro San Judas army base.[11]

In October 2009, El Comercio reported that Staff Sergeant Sanchez EP Ipushima Euler was killed by a mine laid by the Shining Path.[12] Minister of Defense Rafael Rey reportedly stated that the mine was laid by the Peruvian Army.[13] Rey later clarified that an investigation into the incident had found the soldier was killed by an IED planted by the “narcoterrorists” (Shining Path).[14] In December 2009, Peru’s Vice Minister of Foreign Relations Néstor Popolizio confirmed that there had been no mine use by Peru.[15]

 



[1] Law No. 28824 imposes penal sanctions of five to eight years imprisonment. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, April 2007; and statement of Peru, Seventh Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 21 September 2006. The text can be found in the Boletín oficial de normas legales (Official Bulletin of Legal Norms) of the legal newspaper El Peruano, www.gacetajuridica.com.pe.

[2] The police produced the DEXA mine until production facilities were closed in 1994, while the navy produced the CICITEC MG-MAP-304 and the CICITEC MGP-30 mines until production facilities were closed in 1997. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form H, 2 May 2005; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms E and H, April 2003.

[3] Telephone interview with Gen. Raúl O’Connor, Director, Information Office, Ministry of Defense, 19 April 2000. 

[4] Peru has denied mine-laying during the 1995 border conflict with Ecuador. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form C, 6 May 2004.

[5] Two destructions of a total of 11,784 antipersonnel mines between March 2000 and March 2001 are sometimes not included in Peru’s destruction totals. Peru destroyed the bulk of its stockpile, 321,730 mines, between 30 May and 13 September 2001. Peru declared stockpile destruction complete in September 2001, but then destroyed a further 926 mines in December 2001 that it had intended to retain for training. See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 658.

[6] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 16 May 2011. The mines held by the army are: 676 CICITEC (MGP), 600 M18-A1 Claymore, 500 PMA-3, 209 PMB-6N, and 30 POMZ-2M, while the Security Division (División de Seguridad, DIVSECOM) has 25 MAP-87.

[7] The mines transferred for training purposes are: 500 PMD6, 99 CICITEC (MGP), 100 M35C/ESC M5, 525 M-409, 291 PMA-6N, 470 PMNZ-2M (probably POMZ-2M), and 45 MAP-87. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 29 April 2010.

[8] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 29 April 2009. Peru reported a total of 4,047 mines retained for training purposes: 775 CICITEC (MGP), 600 M18-A1 Claymore, 525 M409, 500 PMA-3, 500 PMB-6N (possibly PMD-6M), 500 PMD-6, 500 POMZ-2M, 100 M35 C/ESP M5, and 47 CICITEC mines. All are held by the army, except the 47 CICITEC mines, which are held by INPE.

[9] One article cited use of “explosive traps” in 24 attacks. “Las minas artesanales y trampas explosivas. Asesinos silenciosos en el Alto Huallaga” (“Artisanal mines and explosive traps. Silence murders in the Alto Huallaga”), InfoRegion (Lima), 28 October 2008, www.inforegion.pe. In the past decade, the only other reports of use of antipersonnel mines or antipersonnel mine-like devices by Shining Path came in June and July 2003. See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 657. There were isolated reports of incidents involving explosive devices in subsequent years. See Landmine Monitor Report 2005, p. 476; and Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 588.

[10] “Ataque senderista contra campamento del Corah al norte de Tocache mata a un policía y hiere a otro” (“Shining Path attack against Corah camp north of Tocache kills a policeman and wounds another”), IDL-Reporteros, 6 November 2010, idl-reporteros.pe.

[11] Miguel Gutiérrez R., “Mina que mató a sargento fue colocada por las FFAA” (“Mine that killed sergeant was placed by the armed forces”), La República (Lima), 15 October 2009, larepublica.pe.

[12] “Muere sargento EP en Vizcatán al pisar mina senderista” (“EP sergeant dies after stepping on Shining Path mine”), El Comercio (Lima), 13 October 2009, elcomercio.pe.

[13] Original text: “Desgraciadamente fue una mina nuestra. Toda esa zona está minada para evitar ataques externos, y (Euler Sánchez ) no tuvo la precaución de ir por los lugares que estaban indicados. Pisó una mina nuestra; eso le ocasionó la muerte.” Miguel Gutiérrez R., “Mina que mató a sargento fue colocada por las FFAA” (“Mine that killed sergeant was placed by the armed forces”), La República (Lima), 15 October 2009, larepublica.pe.

[14] Letter from Rafael Rey, Minister of Defense, to the ICBL, 27 November 2009.

[15] He also said the Ministry of Defense had sent instructions to ensure the armed forces have the right information on legal obligations and international commitments, and that the Ministry of Defense had checked the stockpile of retained mines and none were missing. Notes from ICBL meeting with Néstor Popolizio Bardales, Vice Minister of Foreign Relations, and Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, Contraminas, in Cartagena, 3 December 2009.


Last Updated: 31 July 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions

Convention on Cluster Munitions status

Signatory

Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings

Attended Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011 and intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2012

Key developments

Domestic ratification process completed, awaiting deposit of ratification instrument

Policy

The Republic of Peru signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008.

As of July 2012, Peru had completed its domestic ratification process for the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but has not yet deposited its instrument of ratification with the United Nations in New York. On 4 July, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed the local representative of the CMC that the plan is for the President of Peru, OllantaHumala Tasso, to deposit the instrument in September 2012 during the annual United Nations Treaty Event held in conjunction with the opening of the UN General Assembly.[1]

Following inter-agency review of the convention in 2009 and 2010, draft ratification legislationwas introduced in Congress in late 2010.[2]On 18 April 2011, the Committee on Foreign Relations issued a report recommending approval of the ratification legislation.[3]The National Congress approved ratification of the convention on 14 March 2012through Legislative Resolution No 29-843.[4] On 25 April 2012, Decree 021-2012 approving ratification was signed by both President OllantaHumala and Minister of Foreign AffairsRafael RoncaglioloOrbegoso,and then published in the official journal El Peruanothe next day.[5]

As one of the small core group of nations that took responsibility for the Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Peruhosted an international conference on cluster munitions in Lima in May 2007.[6] Since 2008, Peru has continued to support the convention. Peru attended the convention’s Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011, as well as intersessional meetings held in Geneva in April 2012, providing updates on ratification and stockpile destruction at both meetings.

Peru is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Convention on Conventional Weapons

Peru is a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) andengaged in CCW work on cluster munitions in 2011. At the outset of the CCW’s Fourth Review Conference in November 2011, Peru expressed concern at the chair’s draft text and noted its desire for a protocol that is “balanced” and does not undermine the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[7]

Towards the end of the negotiations, Peru described the chair’s draft text as “a step forward” and said it supported efforts to reach consensus on a CCW protocol on cluster munitions.[8]Peru was the only Oslo Process core group member that did not to associate itself with or jointhe group of 50 countries that issued a joint statement on the final day of the negotiations declaring that there was no consensus on the draft protocol text and that it was not acceptable from a humanitarian standpoint.[9]

The Review Conference concluded without agreeing on a protocol, thus marking the end of the CCW’s work on cluster munitions.

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Peru is not known to have ever used or produced cluster munitions.

In May 2007, the Peruvian Minister of Defense publicly disclosed that the Peruvian Air Force possesses stockpiles of CB-470 cluster bombs of South African origin, BME-330 cluster bombs of Spanish origin, and RBK-500 cluster bombs of Russian/Soviet origin.[10]The status and precise composition of the current stockpile is not known.

In 2011, Peru said that it was conducting an inventory and working on plans for the destruction of its stockpiled cluster munitions.[11]In April 2012, Peru confirmed that it was working on the stockpile destruction plan and “calculating the amount ofresources, both national and international cooperation, which will be required to graduallydestroy all stockpiles within the convention’s deadlines.”Peru noted that personnel responsiblefor the destruction process would require training.[12]

Retention

Peru hassaid that it intends to retain cluster munitions for the purposes of trainingin detection, clearance and destruction techniques, but has not yet identified the number of cluster munitions to be retained.[13]

 



[1] Email from Ana Maria Watson, Director, Instituto de seguridad y Derechoshumanos, 4 July 2012.

[2]Letter from José Antonio GarcíaBelaunde, Minister of Foreign Relations, to César Alejandro Zumaeta Flores, President of Congress, 25 January 2011.

[3]Letter from Hildebrando Tapia Samaniego, President, Foreign Relations Commission, to Flores, 10 May 2011.

[4] Legislative Resolution approving the Convention on Cluster Munitions (Resolución Legislative queaprueba la ConvenciónsobreMuniciones en Racimo), No. 29843, 16 March 2012,http://www.aempresarial.com/web/solicitud_nl.php?id=151963.

[5] Decree No. 021-2012-RE, 26 April 2012, http://www.aempresarial.com/web/solicitud_nl.php?id=153933; Ref: 464960, El Peruano, 26 April 2012.

[6]For detail on Peru’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 142–144.

[7] Statement of Peru, CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 14 November 2011. Notes by HRW.

[8]Ibid., 24 November 2011. Notes by AOAV.

[9]Joint Statement read by Costa Rica, on behalf of Afghanistan, Angola, Austria, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Holy See, Honduras, Iceland, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Senegal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe. CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 25 November 2011. List confirmed in email from BantanNugroho, Head of the CCW Implementation Support Unit, UN Department for Disarmament Affairs, 1 June 2012.

[10]Ángel Páez, “Peru se suma a iniciativa mundial para prohibir y destruir las ‘bombas de racimo’” (“Peru joins global initiative to ban and destroy the ‘cluster bombs’”), La República.pe, 29 May 2007. HRW was shown photographs of these cluster munitions by a member of the national media in May 2007. Seealso, Páez, “Se eliminaran las bombas de racimo” (“Cluster bombs will be eliminated”), La República.pe, 29 May 2007.

[11] Statement of Peru, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings,27 June 2011; and Statement of Peru, Convention on Cluster Munitions SecondMeeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011,http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/statement_peru.pdf.

[12]Statement of Peru, Convention on Cluster Munitions IntersessionalMeetings, Geneva, 18 April 2012,http://www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/04/Intervencion_Reunion_Intersesional_CMR_-_Destruccion_de_existencias.pdf.

[13]Ibid.


Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) contamination in Peru are the result of internal armed conflict and a border war with Ecuador in the 1990s.

Mines

Peru has had two distinct mine problems, although a third arose in 2012 as a result of torrential rains in Chile. The first threat is located in the Condor Mountain Range in the sparsely populated Amazon basin, where, in 1995, antipersonnel mines were placed along the border in the departments of Amazonas, Cajamarca, Piura, and Tumbes during an armed conflict with Ecuador.[1] Since May 2010, Peru and Ecuador have been exchanging additional information about mined areas on their common border. In its Article 7 transparency report covering 2010, Peru included reference to 13 mined areas located in Ecuador (see mine action section of the Ecuador country profile) and 10 previously unreported areas located in Peru in the districts of Cahuide, Chiquieza, and Pacahacutec.[2]

After officially handing over to Ecuador details of 13 suspect hazardous areas (SHAs) containing 12,292 antipersonnel mines that were found to be in Ecuadorian territory in 2010, and adding 10 SHAs identified on the border with Ecuador but which fall within its territory, Peru revised its remaining contamination down from 34 to 31 SHAs covering a total of 307,000m2 in Achuime, Cenepa, and Santiago sectors of Amazonas department, containing an estimated 13,700 mines.[3]

The second mine problem was located in the center of Peru where, in the 1980s, mines were planted to protect infrastructure against attacks from non-state armed groups.[4] In total, 2,518 electricity pylons, three antenna transmitters, one electricity substation, three high-security prisons, and two police bases were mined.[5] In April 2012, the national police finished clearing the two police bases in Santa Lucia and Tulumayo, which represented completion of clearance of all mined infrastructure.[6]

Although Peru’s primary mine problem is on the northern border with Ecuador, in early 2012 a mine incident shifted attention to its border with Chile in the south and the impact of mines planted by Chile close to the border with Peru in the 1970s. In February 2012, torrential rains and flooding in the Arica-Parinacota region in northern Chile caused antipersonnel and antivehicle mines from the 1970s to surface near the main highway linking Arica, Chile, with Tacna, Peru, in an area called Quebrada de Escritos. In response, Chile closed the road near the border in order to clear the mines, stranding thousands of people on both sides of the border.[7]  The Chilean army reportedly destroyed four mines at the location. But according to Ximena Valcarce, the Mayor of Arica and Parinacota, more than 200 mines were also found near the Las Machas beach. Consequently a three-mile nautical exclusion zone was also put into place, to prevent the arrival of people or boats into the area by sea. CONTRAMINAS, the Peruvian Center for Mine Action, organized risk education for people located near Peru’s border with Chile.

In April 2012, Peru and Chile agreed that an international company should clear the beach of mines. In early June, the two countries announced they had reached agreement with Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) to clear the mined area.[8] NPA planned to conduct an assessment mission by early August 2012 to determine the exact scope, time, cost, and methods required to clear the designated area.[9]

There may also be a threat from improvised mines. In April 2012, two police officers were wounded after stepping on improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in La Convención, near the jungle in VRAE (the valley of the rivers Apurimac and Ene, in central Peru). The officers were injured while searching for two police officers who had been kidnapped while they themselves were searching for 38 oil workers taken hostage by the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso), a non-state armed group fighting against the government.[10]

Explosive remnants of war

In 2009, in a speech to the UN General Assembly, Peru said that it was fighting the Shining Path in rural areas, and that Shining Path was using explosive devices or booby-traps to protect coca harvests.[11] A media report in May 2011 said home-made booby-traps were affecting the government’s coca eradication program in Upper Huallaga Valley in San Martín.[12]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2012

National Mine Action Authority

CONTRAMINAS Executive Council

Mine action center

CONTRAMINAS (Peruvian Center for Mine Action)

International demining operators

RONCO Consulting, Organization of American States (OAS)

National demining operators

Humanitarian Demining Division from National Police, Army Demining General Directorate

National risk education operators

CONTRAMINAS, National Police (DIVSECOM), Ministry of Education, Association of Victims and Survivors of Minefields (Asociación de Victimas y Sobrevivientes de Campos Minados)

The national mine action authority is the CONTRAMINAS Executive Council, comprised of representatives of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Defense, Education, Health, Interior, and the National Council for the Integration of Disabled Persons (Consejo Nacional para la Integracion de las Personas con Discapacidad, CONADIS). The Executive Council, which is chaired by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, sets strategy and priorities, and also approves plans and budgets.[13] Under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Peruvian Center for Mine Action (Centro Peruano de Acción contra las Minas Antipersonal, CONTRAMINAS) coordinates planning and operations to meet Peru’s Mine Ban Treaty obligations, including clearance.[14]

CONTRAMINAS is responsible for overall management and day-to-day coordination of mine action activities. The Organization of American States (OAS) has assisted Peru in mine clearance since May 2001. The Assistance Mission for Mine Clearance in South America (Misión de Asistencia a la Remoción de Minas en Suramérica, MARMINAS), established by the Inter-American Defense Board in May 2003 to support mine clearance in both Ecuador and Peru, provides technical advice to the OAS and monitors demining operations. The OAS provides observers to support the Peruvian army’s clearance operations.[15]

US funding through RONCO has provided training and equipment to CONTRAMINAS and refurbished the National Humanitarian Demining Training Center (Centro Nacional de Capacitación en Desminado Humanitario) at Chiclayo, where both police and army deminers are trained, including Ecuadorians. Located between Lima and the border, Chiclayo is a transit city for demining teams.[16]

Land Release

The Peruvian Armed Forces General Directorate of Humanitarian Demining (Director Ejecutivo de la Dirección General de Desminado Humanitario del Ejército de Perú, DIGEDEHUME) is responsible for clearance of the border with Ecuador.[17] With the completion of mine clearance of the infrastructure in April 2012, it was planned that national police deminers from the specialized unit of the national police, the Security Division of Contraminas (División de Seguridad, DIVSECOM), would be transferred to the border operations to work with the army deminers.[18]

Five-year summary of clearance[19]

Year

Area cleared in border area (m2)

Mines destroyed

2011

46,572

1,495

2010

24,927

133

2009

1,833

44

2008

7,090

644

2007

745

121

Totals

81,167

2,437

Mine clearance in 2011

In 2011, Peru cleared 46,572m2 and destroyed 1,495 antipersonnel mines in mined areas close to the border with Ecuador. This almost doubled the output of 2010 in terms of area cleared, and was the best annual clearance output that Peru has ever achieved. The increased output can be attributed to the overcoming of earlier logistical and planning shortcomings, the purchase of new mine detectors, adjustments to operational procedures and the addition of mechanical assets and mine detection dogs (MDDs), and the increase of annual working shifts for clearance teams from five to 12. (Each shift consists of 20 days.) In April 2012, clearance capacity consisted of 40 deminers from the army and 40 from the national police.[20]

In 2011, the national police completed clearance of the prison in Huacariz, Cajamarca city, and in Huanuco department in April 2012 it completed clearance at the two remaining police prisons.[21]

In January–April 2012 Peru cleared 10,817m2 in Cahuide, Chiqueiza, Huascar, Pachahutec, and Sanchez Racho.[22]

Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty (and in accordance with the eight-year extension request granted in 2008), Peru is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2017.

On 29 February 2012, it was reported that Peru’s Defense Minister Alberto Otárola said the border with Ecuador “would be free of landmines by 2016.” He continued, “I think in 2016 or 2017 we can say that our borders will be free of mines, as all the boundaries of democratic countries that respect the right to life of its citizens, must be.”[23] In May 2012, at the Intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva, Peru said they would clear all remaining mined areas “as quickly as possible”.[24]

Although Peru doubled its productivity in 2011 and planned to increase it further in the coming years, with more than 300,000m2 remaining at the end of 2011, it will still be a challenge for Peru to meet its Article 5 deadline in 2017.

Quality management

CONTRAMINAS conducts quality control on all completed clearance tasks.[25]

Risk Education

In 2011, the Ministry of Education delivered risk education in the area surrounding Santa Lucia and Tulumayo where the two remaining mine-affected police bases are located, and in the Putumayo region near the border with Colombia. CONTRAMINAS implemented risk education activities with indigenous people at La Poza and Galilea on the Santiago river and in Huampami on the Cenepa river, both near the border with Ecuador.[26]

 



[1] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form C, 29 April 2009.

[2] Article 7 Report, Form C, 16 May 2011.

[3] Presentation by Peru at the National Directors and UN Advisors Meeting, Geneva, 21 March 2012; and email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, General Coordinator, CONTRAMINAS (Peruvian Center for Mine Action), 28 June 2012.

[4] Article 5 deadline Extension Request (Revised) 20 August 2008, p. 5; US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2006,” June 2006; and UN, “Interagency Assessment Mission Report–Peru,” 3 September 1999.

[5] Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 28 March 2008, Annex 1, p. 57; and Statement of Peru, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 4 June 2008.

[6] Email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 20 June 2012.

[7] Manuel Vigo, “Peru - Chile border closed due to landmines,” PeruThisWeek.com, 20 February 2012; Manuel Vigo, “Peruvians stranded in Chile, due to border closure,” PeruThisWeek.com, 21 February 2012; Daniel Boyle, “Chile – Peru Border Reopens,” February 22, 2012; “Notes from the Americas: Some background on Chile’s landmines,” Wordpress.com, 23 February 2012.

[8] Manuel Vigo, “Peru asks Chile to remove landmines from border,” PeruThisWeek.com, 28 May 2012; Manuel Vigo, “Peru confirms Humala’s visit to Chile, after demining agreement is reached,” PeruThisWeek.com, 4 June 2012; Andina, “De-mining efforts boost mutual trust between Peru, Chile,” PeruThisWeek.com, 16 April 2012; Manuel Vigo, “Peru protests incursion by Chilean soldiers,” PeruThisWeek.com, 28 February 2012; and email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 20 June 2012.

[9] Emails from Steinar Essen, Head of Mine Action Department, NPA, 22 June 2012; and from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS (Peruvian Center for Mine Action), 20 July 2012.

[10] Manuel Vigo, “Peru police officers injured by landmines in VRAE,” PeruThisWeek.com, 27 April 2012.

[11] Statement of Peru, Fourth Committee, 64th Session of the UN General Assembly, 29 October 2009, www.reliefweb.int.

[13] Email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, Contraminas, 20 July 2009.

[14] Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 28 March 2008.

[15] Interview with Guillermo Leal, South America Regional Coordinator, OAS, Bogotá, 19 April 2008; and email from Adriana C. Frenchia, Mine Action Program, OAS, 26 August 2008.

[16] Email from Ed Trimakas, Program Officer, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement, US Department of State, 12 May 2010; and Statement of Peru, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 June 2010.

[17] Interview with Maj. David Fernández, Head of Humanitarian Demining, CONTRAMINAS, Lima, 15 September 2008; and interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, in Managua, 25 February 2009.

[18] Email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 20 June 2012.

[19] Presentation by Peru at the National Directors and UN Advisors Meeting, Geneva, 21 March 2012.

[20] Ibid.; and email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, General Coordinator, CONTRAMINAS, 20 June 2012.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Presentation by Peru at the National Directors and UN Advisors Meeting, Geneva, 21 March 2012.

[23] Manuel Vigo, “Peru and Ecuador agree to clear border landmines by 2016,” Peru This Week (an online magazine tailored to English speaking foreigners living in Peru), 29 February 2012.

[24] Statement of Peru, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012.

[25] Email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 20 July 2012.

[26] Statement of Peru, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 May 2012; and email from Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 20 July 2012.


Last Updated: 26 September 2012

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2011

435 (52 killed; 379 injured; 4 unknown)

Casualties in 2011

1 (2010: 7)

2011 casualties by outcome

1 injured (2010: 2 killed; 5 injured)

2011 casualties by device type

1 victim-activated IED

The Monitor identified one new casualty in Peru in 2011; a soldier was injured after stepping on a victim-activated improvised explosive device (IED) in the River Apurímac and River Ene valley (VRAE) in September.[1] Seven casualties were reported for 2010, all from victim-activated IEDs.[2]

The last confirmed casualties caused by factory-made mines in Peru occurred in 2007.[3] Since 2007, most of the casualties identified have been caused by victim-activated IEDs in areas of coca cultivation.[4]

In May 2012, a Peruvian man was killed in Chile when his car hit an antivehicle mine in the Arica and Parinacota region on the border with Peru.[5]

The total number of mine/IED and explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties recorded in Peru since 1991 is 435 (52 killed; 379 injured; four unknown).[6]

Victim Assistance

Peru is known to have survivors of landmines, including victim-activated IEDs, and other types of ERW. Peru has made a commitment to provide victim assistance as a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Between 1991 and the end of 2011, there were at least 379 mine/ERW survivors identified in Peru.[7] In 2011, some efforts were underway to increase availability and access to physical rehabilitation and register mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities in government social programs, such as medical insurance and pensions. However, throughout the year, access to services remained difficult for most survivors.

Assessing victim assistance needs

In 2011, no assessment of the needs of mine/ERW survivors was carried out, though the Peruvian Center for Mine Action (Centro Peruano de Acción contra las Minas Antipersonales, CONTRAMINAS) and victim assistance service providers continued to use information collected in 2009 and 2010. Information was used to refer survivors to existing services.[8]

Victim assistance coordination[9]

Government coordinating body/focal point

CONTRAMINAS

Coordinating mechanism

Victim Assistance Consultative Committee: led by CONTRAMINAS, including representatives from CONADIS, INR, NGOs, and survivor associations

Plan

National Victim Assistance Plan

CONTRAMINAS held several victim assistance coordination meetings in 2011 on an “as-needed” basis to coordinate and monitor the provision of victim assistance to some 140 survivors over the course of the year. Meetings included other government ministries, victim assistance service providers, such as the National Institute of Rehabilitation (Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, INR), and survivor associations.[10]

In 2011, CONTRAMINAS and the Polus Center continued implementing Peru’s National Victim Assistance Plan, approved in 2010.[11] The Plan’s objectives include providing individualized support for socio-economic reintegration for all registered survivors and strengthening local healthcare and rehabilitation facilities in mine affected areas.[12] Throughout the year, CONTRAMINAS monitored the implementation of the plan, though no effort was made to compare results achieved by the end of the year with the objectives contained within the plan.[13]

Peru provided updates on victim assistance and disability policy at the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Phnom Penh on 29 November 2011 and at the Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva in May 2012.[14] Peru provided information on mine casualties in form J of its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report.[15]

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

The Association of Victims and Survivors of Minefields (Asociación de Victimas y Sobrevivientes de Campos Minados, AVISCAM) and other national NGOs working with mine survivors are members of the Victim Assistance Consultative Committee.[16]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

In 2011, nearly half of all survivors were assisted by CONTRAMINAS and the Polus Center in securing medical assistance and in applying for national health insurance and/or disability pensions.[17]

As in previous years, medical facilities and the country’s main rehabilitation center were centralized in the capital, while most survivors were based in rural communities. The time and expense of traveling to these services prevented most survivors from accessing them.[18] To address this issue, CONTRAMINAS provided equipment and training to medical professionals at the Huancayo hospital in the province of Junín to provide physiotherapy and make repairs and adjustments to prosthetics.[19] With funding from Japan, Peru constructed a new facility for the INR in a more centrally located and safer area of Lima. It was due to open in mid-2012.[20] The National Council for the Integration of Disabled Persons (Consejo Nacional Para la Integración de la Persona con Discapacidad, CONADIS) carried out a pilot project in the province of Tumbes to provide mobility devices to persons with disabilities living in rural and remote areas.[21]

To improve the quality of prosthetics, the ICRC Special Fund for the Disabled (SFD) and the Polus Center continued to provide training to technicians at the INR.[22] The cost of prosthetics for survivors referred by CONTRAMINAS was covered by the Organization of American States (OAS).[23]

No new economic inclusion initiatives for mine/ERW survivors were identified in 2011. The Polus Center continued to develop individual economic inclusion plans for survivors and provide either education and training or micro-finance.[24]

Peruvian law prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities, but few resources were dedicated to its implementation and persons with disabilities remained economically and socially marginalized. Few efforts were made to ensure the accessibility of public buildings,[25] though the offices of CONTRAMINAS were made accessible during 2011.[26]

Peru ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 30 January 2008.

 



[1] “Militar lambayecano pierde pie izquierdo” (“A soldier from Lambayeque loses his left foot”), Diario Correo, 17 September 2011, www.diariocorreo.pe/nota/36556/militar-lambayecano-pierde-pie-izquierdo/, accessed on 13 June 2012.

[2] “Mueren dos militares al pisar minas antipersonales en el VRAE” (“Two soldiers killed after stepping on landmines in the VRAE”), RPP Noticias, 24 November 2010, www.rpp.com.pe.

[3] Monitor analysis of media reports in 2007; interviews with Carlos Estrada, President, and Bruno Celiz, Secretary, AVISCAM, Lima, 6 and 19 March 2007; email from Jorge Liza, Coordinator, Security Division (División de Seguridad, DIVSECOM), 3 March 2007; email from Carlos Estrada, AVISCAM, 6 March 2007; Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports, Form J, April 2007 and April 2008; response to Monitor questionnaire by Jorge Liza, DIVSECOM, 31 March 2008; and “Lanzan campaña para prevención de minas artisanales” (“Launch of campaign to warn against homemade mines”), Info Regíon (Lima), 6 December 2007, www.inforegion.pe.

[4] See previous editions of the Monitor, www.the-monitor.org.

[5] “Chile-Peru landmine blast kills at least one in car,” BBC News, 27 May 2012, www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-18223274, accessed on 6 June 2012.

[6] This total includes 318 mine casualties and 107 ERW survivors recorded through 2008 by the Peruvian Center for Mine Action (Centro Peruano de Acción contra las Minas Antipersonales, CONTRAMINAS). Additionally, 10 casualties caused by IEDs have been identified between 2009 and 2011 by the Monitor through media monitoring. See also, Statement of Peru, Eighth Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Dead Sea, 21 November 2007.

[7] This figure includes 265 mine survivors registered by CONTRAMINAS as of March 2008, 107 ERW survivors reported in June 2008 and seven IED survivors reported in the media from 2009-2011. Interview with Víctor Gallardo and Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, Lima, 8 March 2010; and Statement of Peru, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 3 June 2010.

[8] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, Coordinator, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.

[9] Statement of Peru, Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 1 December 2010.

[10] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Carola Hunter, Polus Center, 24 March 2011; and Theresa E. Kane, “Victim Assistance in Peru,” The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, Issue 15.1, Summer 2011, www.maic.jmu.edu.

[13] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMIINAS, 12 April 2012.

[14] Statements of Peru, Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011; and Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Standing Committee meetings, Session on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012.

[15] Mine Ban Treaty, Article 7 Report (for the period April 2011 – March 2012), Form J.

[16] Statement of Peru, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 1 December 2010.

[17] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.

[18] Theresa E. Kane, “Victim Assistance in Peru,” The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, Issue 15.1, Summer 2011, www.maic.jmu.edu.

[19] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.

[20] Statement of Peru, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Standing Committee meetings, Session on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012; and ICRC SFD, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 37.

[21] Statement of Peru, Mine Ban Treaty Intersessional Standing Committee meeting, Session on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 23 May 2012.

[22] ICRC SFD, “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2011, p. 37.

[23] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.

[24] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Carola Hunter, Polus Center, 24 March 2011; and Polus Center, “Current Projects: Victim Assistance in Peru,” undated, www.poluscenter.org/international.html#victimperu, accessed 3 August 2012.

[25] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Peru,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[26] Telephone interview with Wilyam Lúcar Aliaga, CONTRAMINAS, 12 April 2012.


Last Updated: 19 September 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

In 2011, Norway, Spain, and the United States (US) contributed US$1,496,894 for clearance activities in Peru.[1] In February 2011, the Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF)[2], a regional development bank, contributed $500,000 to the Peru mine action program.[3] The US has also allocated $800,000 for victim assistance for 2012 to Peru.

The government of Peru contributed $2,465,128 in 2011 to the mine action program.[4]

Since 2007, the government of Peru has contributed more than $8.6 million, or 49% of the budget, to its mine action program.

International contributions in 2011[5]

Donor

Sector

Amount (national currency)

Amount (US$)

US

Clearance

$1,200,000

1,200,000

CAF

Clearance

$500,000

500,000

Norway

Clearance

NOK1,103,040

196,894

Spain

Clearance

€71,782

100,000

Total

1,996,894

Summary of contributions in 2007–2011 (US$)[6]

Year

National contributions

International contributions

Total contributions

2011

2,465,128

1,996,894

4,462,022

2010

2,403,928

2,534,825

4,938,753

2009

1,468,842

2,705,807

4,174,649

2008

960,911

1,262,902

2,223,813

2007

1,303,397

299,381

1,602,778

Totals

8,602,206

8,799,809

17,402,015

 

 



[1] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Lt.-Col. Klaus Koppetsch, Desk Officer Mine Action, German Federal Foreign Office, 20 April 2012; Response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2012; Email from Michael Lundquist, Executive Director, POLUS Center, 7 September 2012; and Email from Carl Case, General Coordinator, OAS, 21 May 2012.

[2] CAF is a financial institution established in 1970 that fosters sustainable development and regional integration in Latin America. Its headquarters are in Caracas, Venezuela.

[3]Suscriben un convenio para desminado de frontera norte” (“Agreement signed to demine northern border”), El Peruano, 9 February 2011.

[4] Article 5 deadline Extension Request (revision), 15 August 2008, p. 45.

[5] Euro average exchange rate for 2011: €1 = US$1.3931. Norway average exchange rate for 2011: NOK5.6022 = US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012.

[6] See ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Peru Support for Mine Action,” 7 October 2010; and Peru Support for Mine Action,” 24 August 2011; and Article 5 deadline Extension Request (revision), 15 August 2008, p. 45.