Vietnam

Last Updated: 17 December 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

Not a State Party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Abstained on Resolution 66/29 in December 2011, as in previous years

Policy

The Socialist Republic of Vietnam has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. Vietnam still considers antipersonnel mines as a legitimate weapon of self-defense and has cited national security concerns, especially border security, as reasons for not joining the Mine Ban Treaty.[1]

In September 2012 a military officer noted that Vietnam has been studying the treaty but stockpiles of mines held by countries outside the treaty are of concern to Vietnam since they could be used at any time.[2] In June 2011, a representative from Vietnam said it was unlikely that the country would join the Mine Ban Treaty at this time because they are still using mines on their borders “as a form of defense.” The representative added that Vietnam was not necessarily laying new mines, but was actively maintaining them.[3]

In August 2011, the president of the Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Cambodian Minister Prak Sokhonn, led a high level mission to engage Vietnamese leaders on accession to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Vietnam sent an observer delegation to the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Phnom Penh in November–December 2011, but did not make any statements. This was the fifth time Vietnam participated as an observer in a Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty. Vietnam made its only statement during an intersessional Standing Committee meeting in June 2008 where it stated, “We support the humanitarian aspects of the Ottawa Convention of Anti-personnel Landmines but we could not sign it yet as it regrettably does not duly take into account the legitimate security concerns of many countries including Vietnam.”[4]

On 2 December 2011, Vietnam abstained from voting on UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 66/29 calling for universalization and full implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty. It has abstained on all previous annual pro-ban treaty UNGA resolutions.

Vietnam signed but has not ratified the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, stockpiling, transfer, and use

Vietnam has not made any new official statements regarding its continued need or capacity for the production of antipersonnel mines or the types and quantities it holds in stockpile.

Vietnam produced antipersonnel mines in the past.[5] In 2008, officials said that Vietnam has not produced mines since the Mine Ban Treaty came into force, but also emphasized that it reserves the right to produce mines in the future.[6] Until Vietnam issues an official public statement that it does not currently and will not in the future produce antipersonnel mines, the Monitor will continue to list Vietnam as one of the few remaining global manufacturers.

In 2003, an official confirmed the existence of a stockpile of antipersonnel mines, saying, “Vietnam does not keep large stores of landmines, but we have enough to protect our country against invasion.”[7]In September 2012, a military officer stated that in the past two years (2011-2012), Vietnam destroyed 287 tons of stockpiled antipersonnel mines as well as destroying a limited number of antivehicle mines. While unable to provide a stockpile figure, the officer stated that “significant amount of mines stocked in Vietnam have been destroyed” and that each year Vietnam destroys around 100 tons of mines. The officer also stated Vietnam needs new technology for destruction of munitions and support from international community.[8]

Vietnam told States Parties in June 2008 that “we strictly observe our policy not to export” antipersonnel mines.[9] The Ministry of Foreign Affairs previously wrote to the Monitor, stating, “Vietnam has never exported and will never export mines.”[10]

Vietnam is not thought to have used antipersonnel mines since its occupation of Cambodia in the 1980s, but it has said it reserves the right to use antipersonnel mines in the future.[11]

 



[2] ICBL meeting with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, Vice Commander of Engineering Command, Ministry of Defence, Oslo, 14 September 2012.

[3] CMC meeting with Phan Hai Anh, Assistant Director General, Department of International Organizations, in Geneva, 27 June 2011.

[4] Statement of Vietnam, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 2 June 2008; and see Landmine Monitor Report 2008, pp. 1,050–1,051.

[5] In the past, Vietnam produced copies of Chinese, Soviet, and United States (US) mines. The only mine Vietnam has reportedly produced since the 1990s is the “apple mine,” which is a recycled version of the BLU-24 (cluster) submunition dropped by the US during the Vietnam War. See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 1,115; and Landmine Monitor Report 1999, p. 513.

[6] See Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 1,051. In 2005 and 2006, officials from the Ministry of National Defense and Ministry of Foreign Affairs told visiting delegations that Vietnam no longer produces antipersonnel mines. See Landmine Monitor Report 2007, p. 1,023.

[7] Interview with Lt.-Gen. Vu Tan, Ministry of National Defense, Hanoi, 13 May 2003. The Ministry of National Defense told the ICBL in 2006 that the stockpile consists only of mines recovered from cleared minefields, see Landmine Monitor Report 2007, p. 1,024. In May 2008, an army official informed a Canadian government delegation that Vietnam’s stockpile of antipersonnel mines will expire in a few years. He stated that Vietnam has gradually started to destroy the mines “lot by lot,” see Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 1,051.

[8] ICBL meeting with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, Ministry of Defence, Oslo, 14 September 2012.

[9] Statement of Vietnam, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 2 June 2008.

[10] Letter from Nguyen Manh Hung, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 8 March 2001. An internal policy document provided to the Monitor by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “The Question of Antipersonnel Mines,” 2 March 2000, also stated that Vietnam has not and will never export antipersonnel mines. Despite the denial of past export, it appears Vietnam provided antipersonnel mines to Cambodia, perhaps until the early 1990s.


Last Updated: 31 July 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Socialist Republic of Vietnam has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Vietnam has expressed its full support for the humanitarian aims of the convention on several occasions, but it has often expressed concern that important producers and stockpilers of cluster munitions have not joined the convention.

On 5 December 2011, Vietnam’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Le Luong Minh, stated that “the fact that the Convention lays the primary responsibilities on resolving consequences of the use of cluster munitions mainly with affected countries, while international cooperation and assistance mechanisms have not been specified, is not supportive to the achievement of the humanitarian goals of the Convention itself.” He emphasized that “Viet Nam believes that those responsibilities should be laid with countries that had produced, used and exported cluster munitions. Only when this matter is resolved in a fair manner can we assure the universalization and effective implementation of the Convention.”[1]

The Deputy Foreign Minister also expressed concern that “The deadline set by the Convention for a State Party to clear all the cluster munition contaminated areas in its territories within 10 years and with no more than 5 years of extension is considered to create a tremendous difficulty for Viet Nam,” which he described as “seriously affected by cluster munitions and with limited resources.”[2]  

In a statement to the convention’s Second Meeting of States Parties in September 2011, Vietnam said that it “supports the spirit and the humanitarian and disarmament goals” of the Convention on Cluster Munitions and noted “the increasing number of States that have become Parties” but again expressed concern at its ability to meet the convention’s clearance obligation as well, “concerns over the fact that victim states, rather than user states, are responsible for solving consequences of past use of cluster munitions while the mechanisms for international cooperation has yet to be institutionalized.”[3]

Previously, in 2010, senior officials informed the CMC that the government was studying a number of issues to address concerns relating to the convention through an interministerial policy review process.[4]

Vietnam participated in two of the international Oslo Process diplomatic conferences to develop the convention text, but attended the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008 and the Oslo Signing Conference in December 2008 as an observer.[5] Vietnam has continued to participate in meetings related to the convention. It attended a regional conference in Bali, Indonesia in 2009 and an international conference in Santiago, Chile in 2010. Vietnam sent a large high-level observer delegation to the First Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Vientiane, Lao PDR in November 2010. It attended the convention’s Second Meeting of States Parties in Beirut Lebanon in September 2011 as well as intersessional meetings in Geneva in June 2011 and April 2012.

Local NGOs have undertaken a number of activities in support of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[6]

Vietnam is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty. Vietnam is also not a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW).

Vietnam is not known to have ever used, produced, or transferred cluster munitions. It is not clear if it possesses a stockpile. Some officials have said that Vietnam does not have a stockpile, but others have been less than certain.[7] Vietnam’s May 2010 position paper states that foreign reports show that Vietnam has never used, produced, transferred, or stockpiled cluster munitions.[8]

 



[1] Statement by H.E. Mr. Le Luong Minh, Deputy Foreign Minister, at the workshop on Joint Efforts in Mitigating the Consequences of Bomb and Mine Remnants of War, Hanoi, 5 December 2011.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Statement by Vietnam to the Second Meeting of States Parties, Convention on Cluster Munitions, Beirut, 14 September 2011, http://bit.ly/JjnNG6.

[4] The process was being led by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with engagement by the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs. Thomas Nash, Coordinator, “Report on Cluster Munition Coalition Visit to Vietnam, 10–11 May 2010,” CMC.

[5] For more details on Vietnam’s cluster munition policy and practice up to early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 261–262.

[6] In August 2011, the Association for Empowerment for Person with Disability held an event to mark the first anniversary of the Convention’s entry into force, http://bit.ly/pLBRPS.

[7] During the CMC mission in May 2010, a Foreign Ministry official said there were not stocks, but a Defense Ministry official was not clear on the issue. Thomas Nash, “Report on Cluster Munition Coalition Visit to Vietnam, 10–11 May 2010,” CMC.

[8] “Vietnam’s Position on Cluster Munition Convention,” undated, but provided to ANZCMC on 26 May 2010.


Last Updated: 15 November 2012

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Vietnam is heavily contaminated by explosive remnants of war (ERW), mainly unexploded ordnance (UXO) and mostly dating back to the war with the United States (US) in the 1960s and first half of the 1970s. This includes contamination from cluster munition remnants that is among the most widespread and extensive in the world. There is, however, no precise figure for the extent of contamination remaining.

ERW still affect all of Vietnam’s 63 provinces and cities. Vietnamese officials continue to assert ERW contamination covers 66,000km2, one-fifth of its total land area,[1] an estimate which reportedly dated from 2002. Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung said in December 2011 that Vietnam had so far cleared a total of some 3,000km².[2]

Cluster munition remnants

The US scattered a total of 413,130 tons of submunitions over Vietnam between 1965 and 1973, striking 55 provinces and cities, including Haiphong, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Hue, and Vinh. Vietnam’s Military Engineering Command has recorded finding 15 types of US-made submunitions.[3] Most submunition types used by the US were air-dropped, but artillery-delivered submunitions were used in central Quang Binh and provinces to the south of it.[4]

The Military Engineering Command says it has also encountered substantial amounts of cluster munitions abandoned by the US military, notably at or around old US air bases, including eight underground bunkers found in 2009, one of them reportedly covering an area of 4,000m2 and containing some 25 tons of munitions.[5]

Other explosive remnants of war

Vietnam estimates it still has between 350,000 and 600,000 tons of ERW to clear, including unexploded bombs, missiles, artillery shells, mortars, and grenades, which are affecting cities as well as rural areas in almost every province.[6] UXO continue to be found routinely in the course of construction and agricultural work, often close to residential areas. Between April and August 2012, military teams working in Ha Tinh Province reportedly destroyed five 500-pound bombs and a 1,000-pound bomb along with 600 submunitions and around 500 pieces of artillery, among other UXO.[7] A Project Renew team called in by a family in Trieu Phong district of Quang Tri province early in 2012 cleared 193 items of UXO, including mortars and rocket propelled grenades, from land located 15 meters from the family home at depths of between 0.5 and 1.5 meters.[8]

Mines

Vietnam has a smaller mine problem, mostly left by conflicts in the 1970s with neighboring Cambodia and China, and affecting areas close to its borders with those countries[9] but also around former US military installations.[10] Vietnam cleared an area up to 1km deep along its northern border under an agreement with China, but areas further inland from the border are still contaminated. Mines in those northern areas were laid by the military of both countries. Since 2004, military engineers have reportedly cleared around 95km² of contaminated land in the northern provinces of Lang Son, Cao Bang, Ha Giang, Lai Chau, and Quang Ninh bordering China under a project known as “Program 120,” destroying mainly Type 72, K58, and PPM-2 antipersonnel mines.[11]

Cambodian border areas are affected by randomly placed mines reflecting the more irregular nature of the fighting there.[12] Many ports and river deltas were mined extensively during the war and were not completely cleared when it ended and some sea mines have been found on the coast.[13]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2012

National Mine Action Authority

National Steering Committee

Mine action center

BOMICEN

International demining operators

NGOs: Mines Advisory Group, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), NPA/Project RENEW, PeaceTrees Vietnam, SODI

National demining operators

People’s Army of Vietnam/BOMICEN, 45 military companies

International risk education operators

Catholic Relief Services, Project RENEW, SODI

National risk education operators

Youth Union

An official decision by the prime minister in 2006 assigned the Ministry of National Defense to oversee mine action at the national level with clearance undertaken by the Army Engineering Corps of the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN);[14] the Technology Centre for Bomb and Mine Disposal (BOMICEN), part of the Ministry of National Defense, acts as a central coordinating body for clearance and survey by national operators.[15]

In 2010−2011, Vietnam created new mechanisms intended to accelerate mine/UXO action. Under Prime Minister’s Decision No. 504 of December 2010, Vietnam established a National Steering Committee (NSC) based at the Ministry of National Defense consisting of 12 members. It is chaired by the prime minister and two government ministers (one from the Ministry of Defense and one from the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs [MoLISA]) serve as deputy co-chairs. Other members include ministers from the ministries of foreign affairs, environment, education, and health. The NSC was launched at a meeting chaired by the prime minister in December 2011.[16] It meets every six months to oversee mine action and decide on policy and budgets.

The NSC is supported by a 21-member Standing Committee or Executive Office, chaired by the vice minister of defense, Senior Lieutenant General Nguyen Chi Vinh.[17] The Executive Office is due to meet quarterly to decide mine action priorities and make recommendations to the NSC. The Vietnam Bomb and Mine Clearance Action Center (VBMAC), which opened in February 2009, will serve as secretariat to the Executive Office.[18]

VBMAC, set up as a civilian agency under MoLISA with the help of a $1.56 million donation from Japan,[19] has a mandate to accelerate clearance and mobilize international funding. VBMAC operates with departments for planning, project management, and finance. Since May 2010 it has also deployed a total of 200 personnel in eight clearance teams and one explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) team operating in central Vietnam’s Quang Tri province. Operations continued into 2011 when these teams were discontinued.[20]

In April 2010, the prime minister approved a Strategic Plan for 2010–2025, the objective of which is to “mobilize domestic and international resources in making efforts to minimize and finally create impact-free environment for social economic development.”[21] Vietnam’s National Mine Action Program for the period from 2011 to 2015, drawn up by the National Steering Committee, says it will focus on:[22]

·         Survey and mapping of contaminated areas “on a national scale;”

·         Clearing 5,000km² of land within the next five years, including 2,000km² in the six central provinces of Nghe An, Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue and Quang Ngai and 3,000km² in other areas;

·         Developing national mine action standards;

·         Strengthening the National Mine Action Database Center;

·         Coordinating delivery of risk education (RE) to reduce accidents; and

·         Advocacy for support of UXO/mine action by other governments, international organizations, international NGOs and individuals.

The government has estimated funding needed to implement the program at US$700 million, but said it would be able to allocate about $200 million, putting a premium on raising overseas donations. The six-point action plan for 2011−2015, projects spending on UXO/mine clearance of VND12,500 billion (US$595.2 million), and VND26 billion (US$1.3 million) on the Landmine Impact Survey.[23] After 2015, BOMICEN says Vietnam will aim to implement clearance and victim assistance projects on a broader scale.[24]

The Vietnamese government reported spending about VND1,600 billion (about US$80 million) for mine action, which it said included clearance, RE, victim assistance/community re-integration, advocacy for funding and “construction of infrastructure within integrated projects.”[25]

Land Release

BOMICEN reported that the total amount of land cleared by the military (and operators accredited with the military) in 2011 amounted to 247.28km²,[26] less than half the 612km² reported by the military the previous year and less than the annual average of about 600km² it said it achieved in 2008–2010.[27] International NGOs reported clearing an additional 3.78km2 of battle areas in 2011.

Survey in 2011

Vietnam started to conduct a Landmine Impact Survey in 2004. The National Mine Action Program 2010−2025 calls for completion of the LIS in 63 provinces and cities by the end of 2013. At the end of 2011, BOMICEN reported it had completed the survey in 19 central, central highlands, and southeastern provinces and cities but it gave no details of survey activity in 2011.[28]

Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) started work in 2012 on a pilot project, training and providing technical advice to military engineers in non-technical survey to evaluate suspected hazardous areas and technical survey to define confirmed hazardous areas, using NPA’s cluster munition remnants survey method developed in Lao PDR. The project was expected to run for three months in Thanh Hoa province, which had not been covered by the landmine impact survey.[29]

Battle area and roving clearance in 2011

Vietnam’s army remains the biggest UXO/demining operator, reporting in 2011 that it had some 250 mine/UXO clearance teams with some 20 to 25 personnel in each team, of which 160 teams are military engineers and the rest from military companies. BOMICEN said 45 operators (military companies) were accredited under the army in 2011 and one operator, VBMAC, under MoLISA. VBMAC had worked with 10 clearance teams until late 2011.[30]

International operators reported clearing almost the same area in 2011 as in the previous year. However, they have shifted increasingly to more mobile operations in recent years and increased the number of roving tasks by almost half in 2011, destroying almost the same number of ERW items overall but including in that total one-third more submunitions.

Mines Advisory Group (MAG) deployed eight EOD teams (with 133 technicians) and six community liaison teams by the end of 2011; after receiving funding from the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development, it expanded its presence in Quang Tri province from one to four EOD teams and from one to three community liaison teams. It was also preparing to shift some capacity from Quang Binh and into Quang Nam province for the first time in 2012.[31] Although MAG cleared nearly three times as much area as in the previous year, 98% of the items destroyed were cleared in the course of roving operations.

NPA worked in partnership with, and provided management support for, Project RENEW operations in Quang Tri. This was in addition to conducting its own project in Thua Thien Hoa province, expanding capacity from a combined strength of 27 in 2010 to 60 at the end of 2011 (Project RENEW accounted for 49 while NPA accounted for 11). NPA conducted 89 spot EOD tasks in 2011, clearing 274 items of UXO; it expected to expand in 2012 to add three 10-man multi-task teams conducting survey, battle area clearance (BAC) and roving EOD. Project RENEW cleared 30% more area after starting BAC operations in January 2011 compared with April the previous year; in 2012 it planned to expand its operating area and possibly add a nine-man team, depending on funding.[32]

PeaceTrees Vietnam also increased capacity in 2011, adding a 16-man clearance team and operating with two mobile EOD teams in Quang Tri Province and one mobile EOD team in Quang Binh.[33]

Solidarity Service International (SODI), a German NGO, had a total of 139 personnel in 2011, including two large BAC teams with a total of 96 people and five EOD teams with a total of 29 people working in Quang Tri and Thua Thien Hue provinces. SODI started operating a mobile small area BAC/EOD team in Quang Tri in 2010 and added a second in Thua Thien Hue in 2011; it introduced a two-man special search team with equipment for deeper searches as well as forming an EOD unit within the larger BAC teams in order to tackle spot UXO found near BAC tasks. SODI also created community focal points in its area of operations, increasing the number by 10 to 30 in 2011.[34]

International NGO clearance in 2011

Operator

Battle area cleared (m2)

Roving tasks completed

Submunitions cleared

Other UXO cleared

Antipersonnel mines cleared

MAG

174,436

11,839

1,676

14,244

6

NPA/Project RENEW

76,183

1,169

567

2,162

10

PeaceTrees Vietnam

191,677

391

0

6,677

0

SODI

3,336,249

1,757

1,555

17,368

20

Totals

3,778,545

15,156

3,798

40,451

36

Quality management

International NGOs conduct internal quality assurance (QA). In the case of NPA and Project RENEW, QA is conducted by NPA’s operations manager and technical advisor and RENEW’s national technical officer. MAG has a three-man QA team which conducted 877 internal assessments in 2011 and its technical operations manager also conducts a random assessment of each EOD team every six months. SODI maintains a QA officer in each of the two provinces it works in.[35]

Risk Education

MoLISA has taken the lead role in UXO/mine RE since 2010, with VBMAC acting as its coordinating body, planning and mobilizing resources for RE.[36] The six-point action plan for 2011−2015, drawn up by the National Steering Committee, calls for an expenditure of VND200 billion (US$14.2 million) on RE.[37]

Catholic Relief Services continues to deliver RE through community outreach teams in Quang Tri and Quang Binh, as well as to partner with departments of education to help produce an RE curriculum for school children.[38]

Among international UXO/mine action NGOs, Project RENEW maintains a Community Reporting Network in two districts of Thua Thien Hue that have provided RE training to Youth Union members; it has also conducted two workshops on improving the quality of RE activities as well as other events in 2011 to deliver UXO accident prevention messages.[39] SODI also provided RE through its small area BAC/EOD teams and through community focal points reaching more than 20,000 people in 2011.[40]

 



[1] “National Mine Action Targets, Tasks, and Implementation Solutions,” Speech by Vice-Minister of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs, Bui Hong Linh, Hanoi, 5 December 2011.

[2] An Dien, “UXO contamination in Vietnam an uphill task,” Thanh Nien News, 8 December 2011.

[3] “Vietnam mine/ERW (including cluster munitions) contamination, impacts and clearance requirements,” Presentation by Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, People’s Army of Vietnam, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[4] Fatal Footprint, the Global Human Impact of Cluster Munitions (Brussels: Handicap International, November 2006), p. 15.

[5] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[6] “Vietnam mine/ERW (including cluster munitions) contamination, impacts and clearance requirements,” Presentation by Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[7] Information provided by Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in email received from VVAF, Hanoi, 24 September 2012.

[8] “Hundreds of unexploded munitions found dangerously near a local house are safely removed,” Project Renew, 15 March 2012.

[9] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PVAN, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[10] Landmine Action, “Explosive remnants of war and mines other than anti-personnel mines,” London, March 2005, p. 181.

[11] Information provided by Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in email from VVAF, Hanoi, 24 September 2012, and in interview in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[12] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[13] Landmine Action, “Explosive remnants of war and mines other than anti-personnel mines,” London, March 2005, p. 181.

[14] Prime Minister’s Decision No. 96/2006/QD-TTg, 4 May 2006.

[15] Email from Col. Nguyen Trong Dac, Ministry of National Defense, 6 August 2006.

[16] Prime Minister’s Decision No. 2338/QĐ-TTg, 22 December 2010, (unofficial translation by VVAF); email response to Landmine Monitor questions by BOMICEN, 4 April 2012; interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PVAN, Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[17] Email response to Landmine Monitor questions from Executive Office of the National Steering Committee, 6 August 2012.

[18] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PVAN, Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[20] Email responses to Landmine Monitor questions from Executive Office of the National Steering Committee, 6 August 2012; and from BOMICEN, 4 April 2012; Response to Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor questionnaire by VBMAC, provided by email, 19 August 2010.

[21] Prime Minister, “Decision on Approval of the National Mine Action Plan Period 2010–2025,” Hanoi, 21 April 2010.

[22] Email response to Landmine Monitor questions from Executive Office of the National Steering Committee, 6 August 2012; Bui Hong Linh, Vice Minister of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs, “The National Mine Action Targets, Tasks and Implementation Solutions,” undated but December 2011.

[23] Bui Hong Linh, Vice Minister of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs, “The National Mine Action Targets, Tasks and Implementation Solutions,” undated but December 2011.

[24] Email from Executive Office of the National Steering Committee, 6 August 2012.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Ibid..

[27] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[28] National Mine Action Program, 2010−2025, p. 17; and email from BOMICEN, 4 April 2012.

[29] Interview with Michael Creighton, Operations Manager, NPA, Vientiane, 11 April 2012.

[30] Email from Executive Office of the National Steering Committee, 6 August 2012; information provided by Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, PAVN, in email received from VVAF, Hanoi, 24 September 2012.

[31] Email from Portia Stratton, Country Programme Manager, MAG, Hanoi, 9 April 2012.

[32] Email from Paul Eldred, Operations Manager, NPA, Vietnam, 21 March 2012.

[33] Email from Milica Koscica, Program Coordinator, PeaceTrees Vietnam, 19 March 2012.

[34] Email from Marion Gnanko, Project Manager, UXO/Mine Action, SODI, and Max Wennbo, Senior Technical Advisor, SODI Vietnam, 16 April 2012.

[35] Emails from Portia Stratton, MAG, Hanoi, 9 April 2012; Paul Eldred, NPA, Vietnam, 21 March 2012; and Marion Gnanko and Max Wennbo, SODI, 16 April 2012.

[36] Response to Monitor questionnaire by VBMAC, provided by email from VVAF, 19 August 2010.

[37] Bui Hong Linh, Vice-Minister of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs, “The National Mine Action Targets, Tasks and Implementation Solutions,” undated but December 2011, p. 3.

[38] Catholic Relief Services website, accessed 21 August 2012; and email from Sandra Rihtman, Country Representative, CRS, 11 August 2010.

[39] Email from Paul Eldred, NPA, Vietnam, 21 March 2012.

[40] Email from Marion Gnanko and Max Wennbo, SODI, 16 April 2012.


Last Updated: 08 August 2012

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2011

104,902 mine/ERW casualties (38,922 killed; 65,980 injured)

Casualties in 2011

31 (2010: 42 )

2011 casualties by outcome

14 killed; 17 injured (2010: 8 killed; 34 injured)

2011 casualties by device type

1 mine; 30 ERW

Details and trends

On the basis of incomplete data,[1] at least 31 new mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties were identified in Vietnam in 2011. All but one casualty were civilians: 26 civilian casualties were adult men, two were women and two were boys.[2] One military deminer was injured during clearance operations in 2011 by an antipersonnel mine in Dak Nong province.[3] The 2011 total represented a decrease from the 42 casualties reported in 2010.

At least 104,902 mine/ERW casualties, (38,922 killed; 65,980 injured) have been reported in Vietnam. It was reported that from 1975 to the end of 2007, the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MoLISA) recorded 104,701 mine/ERW casualties (38,849 killed; 65,852 injured).[4] The total number of casualties is not known due “inadequate statistics” and the absence of a nationwide casualty data collection mechanism.[5] The semi-governmental organization Project RENEW recorded 7,081 mine/ERW casualties (including 2,637 people killed) between 1975 and the end of 2011 in Quang Tri Province alone.[6]

At least 2,111 casualties from incidents involving cluster munition remnants were reported as of the end of 2011. However, one estimate put the likely total of such casualties as high as 34,000.[7] In many cases, the type of explosive remnants causing casualties could not be determined and all these were recorded as ERW casualties, although there were likely many among them caused by unexploded submunitions. [8] In addition, numerous casualties during cluster munition strikes have been reported.[9]

Victim Assistance

The total number of mine/ERW survivors is unknown, but has been estimated to be between 66,000 and 100,000.[10]

Summary of victim assistance efforts since 1999

Vietnam does not have a national casualty data collection system, however a major study of survivor needs was made by an NGO in 2006 and updated in 2010. Clear Path International (CPI) continued the geographic expansion of passive surveillance together with services to new survivors while it transitioned to national management. Coordination among governmental bodies responsible for the provision of victim assistance and the protection of the rights of persons with disability improved considerably since 2010.[11] The number of the survivors that received services by both government agencies and civil society organizations or NGOs gradually increased. The NGO and local government collaboration, Project RENEW, steadily increased its services to survivors and the capacity-building of local medical institutions. Landmine Survivors Network Vietnam (LSNV) became the first organization to include survivors in the design and provision of services and the only international NGO to successfully transition from an international to a national NGO, becoming the Association for Empowerment for Persons with Disability (AEPD) in 2010.

Survivors had more opportunities to access free healthcare programs and inclusive education programs provided by the government and relevant organizations. Physical rehabilitation also improved in both quality and in the number of services available from existing service providers. Since 1995, the ICRC Special Fund for the Disabled (SFD) assisted the Vietnamese rehabilitation sector to both increase the quality of its services and expand their geographical coverage to virtually the entire country, while serving the country’s most vulnerable populations.[12]

The greatest improvements seen by organizations representing mine/ERW survivors and persons with disability since the Monitor began reporting on Vietnam in 1999 have been in the development of laws designed to protect their rights and provide access to services; the least progress has been reported in economic reintegration through employment or direct financial assistance.[13] Gradual improvements were made to increase employment opportunities, accessibility to available services and in social inclusion activities. Poor survivors in rural areas were especially vulnerable.[14] Reaching survivors in remote and rural areas remained difficult for service providers and generally these populations did not receive adequate assistance. [15]

Assessing victim assistance needs

There was no national survey or needs assessment for mine/ERW survivors in 2011. However, an ongoing nationwide impact survey conducted by the National Steering Committee for Mine Action (NSCMA) contains information regarding casualties. Vietnam Bomb/Mine Action Center (VBMAC), which is the secretariat for the steering committee, also hosts the national database which became operational in September 2011.[16] In 2012, inter-sectoral government discussions began with international organizations regarding the development of a pilot injury surveillance system that would include mine/ERW casualties.[17]

MoLISA is responsible for the collection and management of information regarding persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors. Information on the needs of mine/ERW survivors was collected through broader assessments of the needs of persons with disabilities. However, during this period MOLISA was not capable of developing a comprehensive national database on persons with disabilities. Therefore, information on persons with disabilities remained scattered and inconsistent. Various ministries, such as Education and Heath, also collect and manage information on persons with disabilities as part of their activities. This information was used to develop, adjust, or supplement policies and programs that support persons with disabilities, including survivors.[18] In 2012, MoLISA began planning a needs assessment for the employment of persons with disabilities.[19]

In 2011 there were ongoing NGO activities to assess the needs of the survivors through regular implementation of projects and services. Follow up from the 2010 social survey undertaken by the Association for Empowerment for Persons with Disability (AEPD) focused on expansion of existing activities. The findings of the survey were used by local agencies to better integrate the needs of persons with disabilities into their work and were used by one lending institution to directly assist survivors with the loan application process.[20] Project RENEW continued to use its 2010 survey update to improve program effectiveness.[21] CPI routinely used information collected from survivors to inform the services they provided.[22]

Victim assistance coordination in 2011[23]

Government coordinating body/ focal point

The Department of Social Protection under MoLISA is responsible for coordination addressing the rights of persons with disabilities and for victim assistance

Coordinating mechanism

The Victim Assistance Project within the National Mine Action Program (NMAP), managed by MoLISA

Landmine Working Group, a mine action forum consisting of national and international NGOs and other relevant stakeholders, is also used to coordinate victim assistance

Plan

Vietnam does not have a specific victim assistance plan: however National Mine Action Program includes a framework called the Victim Assistance Project; Since 2012, MOLISA had been developing a comprehensive nation-wide victim assistance plan for Vietnam. 

The “National Mine Action Program for Vietnam Period 2010-2025,” which includes victim assistance, was approved by the prime minister in April 2010.

In April 2011, MoLISA issued the decision to implement the first phase of the “Victim Assistance Project for the Period 2012-2015.” The project is managed and implemented by MoLISA in cooperation with relevant authorities at the central, provincial, and sub-provincial levels. MoLISA’s Department of Social Protection is directly responsible for coordination.[24] The project framework details key actions to be taken, responsible or cooperating agencies and annual budgets. The project framework does not specify timeframes for the actions or the method of coordination. However, the responsible agencies met several times in 2011, primarily to establish the budget[25] and to plan activities for 2012.[26]

The Victim Assistance Project was to focus on provinces with highly mine/ERW affected areas and those with significant numbers of casualties. Beneficiaries include mine/ERW survivors and affected families. The budget was to be funded by the government, although MoLISA also planned to seek funding from international sources in order to offset some government expenditure.[27] Key activities of the Victim Assistance Project include:

·         Developing victim assistance standards;

·         Strengthening the emergency medical and physical rehabilitation sectors;

·         Amending existing social assistance policies and decrees;

·         Increasing social allowances to which mine/ERW survivors are entitled;

·         Expanding social work services and promoting social reintegration.

The Victim Assistance Project’s aims were in line with those of the National Coordination Committee on Disabilities (NCCD), an interministerial body chaired by MoLISA that also includes NGO representatives; both are coordinated by the Department of Social Protection.[28] The NCCD is responsible for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). In 2011, the NCCD held quarterly meetings as well as focus workshops.[29] It also liaised with national and foreign organizations.[30] Overall, despite high-level meetings, the involvement of agencies and ministries in victim assistance disability planning and coordination was not comprehensive.[31]

Non-governmental service providers also discussed victim assistance at meetings of the Landmine Working Group. In 2011, the Landmine Working Group organized two coordination meetings, the same frequency as in the previous year.[32]

The first official national DPO coordination body, the Vietnam Federation on Disability (VFD), was established in March 2011. Its activities included regional workshops, a jobs fair and monitoring visits.[33]

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

Survivors and organizations which represent them were not included in the development of the Victim Assistance Project within the NMAP.[34]

The inclusion of mine/ERW survivors and persons with disabilities or their representative organization in planning and provision of victim assistance again increased in 2011.[35] Survivors/persons with disabilities or their representative organizations were consulted in the planning or monitoring of programs and activities and in developing legislation. They also attended meetings, seminars, or workshops to contribute recommendations and share lessons learned.[36]

Survivors and other persons with disabilities did not have many opportunities to participate in the development, implementation and monitoring of plans. The Government requests MoLISA to develop plans and MoLISA officially consults ministries and departments. However, in some cases the opinions and comments of survivors and other persons with disabilities or their representative organizations were taken into account.[37] Persons with disabilities and their representative organizations were consulted in the development or review of national programs, such as the national poverty reduction program, vocational laws, and various educational policies relevant to them.[38]

Many NGOs have consulted survivors and other persons with disabilities on issues that related to their needs and adjusted their services in accordance with survivors’ recommendations. Survivors and persons with disabilities implement victim assistance activities with some NGOs. The NGO AEPD continued to employ survivors as outreach workers and, in 2011, one survivor joined the office staff.[39]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities in 2011[40]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2010

MoLISA and the Ministry of Health

Government

Prosthetics and rehabilitation services

Overall services decreased due to phasing out ICRC support in some centers; increased proportion of services to survivors

AEPD

National NGO

Peer support program; economic inclusion; loans to survivors and vocational training, referrals, counseling and medical assistance in Quang Binh province; national advocacy for the rights of persons with disabilities

Ongoing; increased services due to expansion of existing projects

PeaceTrees Vietnam

International NGO with local partnerships

Medical assistance and education/economic inclusion for mine/ERW survivors in Quang Tri province

Ongoing

Vietnam Assistance for the Handicapped (VNAH)

International NGO with local partnerships

Operated six regional prosthetics centers in cooperation with MoLISA; provided vocational training and psychological support

Ongoing; established the Vietnam Federation on Disability in March 2011

Project RENEW

International NGO and provincial government partnership

Provided assistive devices and a prosthetic and orthopedic mobile outreach program and community-based rehabilitation for amputees; life support training for local health workers; first-aid equipment to commune health stations and surgery equipment for district hospitals; micro-credit projects, and psychological support. Huong Hoa district, Quang Tri province.

Ongoing activities increased due to expansion of mobile outreach, CBR, life support training and micro-credit; increased the number of beneficiaries by 25% from the previous year

Solidarity Service International

International NGO

Built houses and provided credit to survivors and their families

No assistance was provided in 2011 due to completion of project, however a new project with the same services was planned for 2012/2013

Clear Path International (CPI)-Vietnam

International NGO

Provided and facilitated emergency and ongoing medical care; family counseling for recent victims; prosthetics and rehabilitation; small grants, including educational scholarships and sponsorship of special Olympics sport events in eight districts of Central Vietnam; emergency relief support, as needed, in partnership with local provincial government

Provided services to slightly fewer beneficiaries in 2011 but increased the level of services; increased geographical coverage for assistance to new casualties

ICRC Special Fund for the Disabled (SFD), in cooperation with the Vietnamese Red Cross Society

International organization with local partner

Subsidized the provision of assistive devices and rehabilitation; identified amputees in need of prostheses replacement; and covered transport costs to centers and food costs, targeting amputees not covered by social security schemes

Support and services ongoing; slightly fewer amputees received subsidized services in 2011

In 2011, services for mine/ERW survivors continued to improve in quality, quantity, and accessibility in Vietnam. The number of the survivors that received services from both government agencies and civil society organizations or NGOs gradually increased.[41] However, outside major population centers and particularly in remote areas, accessibility to activities and services was lacking.[42]

To improve emergency medical response, the ICRC supported first-aid courses for community representatives and volunteers in Quang Tri province.[43]

The Ministry of Health estimated less than 10% of mine/ERW survivors are able to access rehabilitation programs in Vietnam.[44] In 2011, there was no progress in ICRC discussions with the Vietnamese National Red Cross Society (VNRCS) on whether the VNRCS could possibly take over some of the SFD’s assistance to destitute disabled persons.[45]

There remained a significant need for employment and training opportunities for mine/ERW survivors and other people with disabilities. The majority of people with disability remain unemployed and continued to face discrimination in hiring. In 2011, economic inclusion services for persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors, continued to increase. Training for persons with disabilities generally remained inadequate and was not aligned with demands of the labor market.[46]

In 2011, international and domestic NGOs increased initiatives to create work opportunities for survivors and other persons with disability through the establishment or expansion of small-scale businesses. The Blue Ribbon Employers Council (BREC) increased the number of businesses that were members and provided consultations and employment for persons with disabilities.[47]

Psychological support was not widely available and, although it was integrated in rehabilitation processes, did not receive separate government resources. Social inclusion services for survivors and other persons with disabilities increased through both government and NGO programs, including new resources allocated for social reintegration activities. More self-help clubs and sports groups were established in 2011. However, the number of the survivors and persons with disabilities participating in cultural and sport activities remained very limited.[48]

The first comprehensive national law providing for the rights of persons with disabilities came into effect in January 2011. The new law prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities and requires equality in health care, rehabilitation, education, vocational training and employment.[49] The Ministry of Transportation implemented accessibility for public transport. Construction or major renovation of new government and large public buildings must include access for persons with disabilities. The Ministry of Construction units enforced accessibility regulations, primarily in major cities and pilot locations.[50]

Vietnam signed the CRPD on 22 October 2007.

 



[1] Casualty data was available primarily for one province (Quang Tri) of 58 in Vietnam, with casualties recorded for an additional eight: Binh Phuoc, Bind Thuan, Da Nang, Khanh Hoa, Phu Yen, Quang Binh, Quang Ngai and Thua Thien Hue.

[2] Email from Tran Hong Chi, Program Coordinator, CPI, 30 May and 6 June 2012; and casualty data provided by Dang Quang Toan, Mine Victim Assistance Manager, Project RENEW, 1 June 2012.

[3] Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, “Minutes of Meeting: Landmine Working Group Meeting,” Hanoi, 14 October 2011. In addition one person was killed and 10 injured in an accident in a military munition storage facility. These casualties were not included in the annual total. “Explosion kills one, injures 10 at Vietnam military depot,” Thanh Nien, 20 September 2011, www.thanhniennews.com/2010/pages/20110920173414.aspx.

[4] Email from Quang Toan, Project RENEW, 9 August 2008. The additional casualties for 2008, 2009, and 2010 were reported by the Monitor, see the Vietnam country reports and profiles, www. the-Monitor.org.

[5] Socialist Government of Viet Nam Web Portal (VGP News), “Hard to clear post-war bombs and mines,” Vietnamese government press noted that the total number of casualties remains approximate due to “inadequate statistics:” see, http://news.gov.vn/Home/Hard-to-clear-postwar-bombs-and-mines/20125/14389.vgp.

[6] Email from Quang Toan, Project RENEW, 1 June 2012 and 28 June 2008.

[7] This estimate assumes that some 33% of all mine/ERW casualties reported since 1975 were likely to have been caused by unexploded submunitions. HI, Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: Handicap International, May 2007), p. 39; Monitor analysis of data provided by emails from Tran Hong Chi, CPI, 12 March 2009 and 1 July 2009; Phan Van Hung, Project RENEW, 12 August 2008; Monitor media analysis from January to December 2008. Monitor analysis of data provided by email from Tran Thi Thanh Toan, Administrative Coordinator, CPI, 24 July 2008; and data provided by email from Hung, Project RENEW, 12 August 2008.

[8] Email from Quang Toan, Project RENEW, 28 June 2008.

[9] See for example documentation on deaths and injuries caused by cluster munitions in “International War Crimes Tribunal – 1967,” www.vietnamese-american.org.

[10] “Scrap metal search a risky business,” Thanh Nien (Ho Chi Minh City), 30 May 2008, www.thanhniennews.com.

[11] MoLISA, Victim Assistance Project Period 2012-2015, Hanoi, 2011; Socialist Republic of Vietnam, National Mine Action Program Period 2010-2025, Hanoi, 2010; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Le Thi Khanh, Deputy Head of Planning and Finance Department, MoLISA (MoLISA), 25 May 2012.

[12] See the Vietnam country reports and profiles from 1999 to date: www. the-Monitor.org.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Thanh Hong, Vice-Chairperson, AEPD, 11 May 2011; interview with Quang Toan, Project RENEW, in Geneva, 27 June 2011; and ICRC SFD “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 42.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, “Minutes of Meeting: Landmine Working Group Meeting,” Hanoi, 14 October 2011. NSCMA is alternately known as the National Mine Action Authority.

[17] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012; email from Ted Paterson, Head, Strategic Management, Geneva International Center for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), 6 June 2012; and email from Nguyen Thu Ha, Program Manager, Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation (VVAF), 6 June 2012. Discussions to date have involved MoLISA, GICHD and VVAF.

[18] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012; and response Monitor questionnaire by Nguyen Thi Thanh Hong, AEPD, 11 May 2011.

[19] Telephone interview with Nguyen Thi Thanh Hong, AEPD, 6 June 2012.

[20] Ibid., AEPD, 1 June 2012, and 6 June 2012. Among these local agencies were the Departments of Industry and Social Affairs, the Fatherland Front, Vietnam Red Cross and the Social Policy Bank.

[21] Email from Quang Toan, Project RENEW, 1 and 5 June 2012.

[22] Email from Hong Chi, CPI, 30 May and 6 June 2012.

[23] MoLISA, Victim Assistance Project Period 2012-2015, Hanoi, 2011; Socialist Republic of Vietnam, National Mine Action Program Period 2010-2025, Hanoi, 2010; response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012; and Telephone interview with Nguyen Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[24] Ibid. The government bodies named in the National Mine Action Program and Victim Assistance Project are: Ministries of Defense, Health, Agriculture and Rural Development, Planning and Investment, and the National Institute of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation; Departments of Social Protection, Planning and Finance, and of Accredited People (MoLISA); People’s Committees at the provincial and sub-provincial levels.

[25] MoLISA, Victim Assistance Project Period 2012-2015, Hanoi, 2011; Socialist Republic of Vietnam, National Mine Action Program Period 2010-2025, Hanoi, 2010; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012.

[26] Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, “Minutes of Meeting: Landmine Working Group Meeting,” Hanoi, October 2011.

[27] MoLISA, “Victim Assistance Project Period 2012-2015”, Hanoi, 2011; Socialist Republic of Vietnam, “National Mine Action Program Period 2010-2025,” Hanoi, 2010; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012. For 2012, the estimated budget for the Victim Assistance Project was VND 257 billion, or about $US 12.4 million.

[28] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012; and email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 6 June 2012.

[29] Telephone interview with Thanh Hong, AEPD, 6 June 2012.

[30] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[31] Telephone interview with Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[32] Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, “Minutes of Meeting: Landmine Working Group Meeting,” Hanoi, April and October 2011.

[33] VNAH, “Updates VNAH and HealthEd,” Winter 2011-2012, p.8, http://www.vnah-hev.org/News-Letter-Winter-2011-2012.html.

[34] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Thi Khanh, MoLISA, 25 May 2012.

[35] Telephone interview with Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[36] Ibid., 6 June 2012; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Thanh Hong, AEPD, 11 May 2011.

[37] Telephone interview with Thanh Hong, AEPD, 6 June 2012; and US Department of State, “2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 8 April 2011.

[38] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012.

[39] Telephone interview with Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012, and 6 June 2012.

[40] Email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012; email from Pham Thi Hoang Ha, Project Officer, Peace Trees Vietnam, 15 May 2012; VNAH, “Updates VNAH and HealthEd,” Winter 2011-2012, pp. 6 and 8, www.vnah-hev.org/News-Letter-Winter-2011-2012.html; email from Quang Toan, Project RENEW, 1 and 5 June 2012; email from Rickard Hartmann, Country Representative and UXO Program Manager, Solidarity Service International, 27 May and 5 June 2012; email from Hong Chi, CPI, 30 May 2012; and ICRC SFD “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, pp. 41–43. A total of 1,944 destitute amputees received subsidized services in 2011 (53% were war victims) and 2,432 in 2010 (50% were war victims): 65% of all ICRC services are for survivors.

[41] Email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[42] Ibid.; and ICRC Special Fund for the Disabled (SFD) “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 42.

[43] ICRC SFD “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 42.

[44] Email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[45] ICRC SFD “Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, May 2012, p. 40.

[46] Email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012.

[47] VNAH, “Updates VNAH and HealthEd,” Winter 2011-2012, p.6, http://www.vnah-hev.org/News-Letter-Winter-2011-2012.html.

[48] Email from Thanh Hong, AEPD, 1 June 2012; and NCCD, “Annual Report on Status of People with Disabilities in Vietnam,” Hanoi, December 2010.

[49] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012; and US Department of State, “2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 8 April 2011.

[50] US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam,” Washington, DC, 24 May 2012. Physical accessibility was enforced in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Quang Nam, and Ninh Binh.


Last Updated: 05 October 2012

Support for Mine Action

Support for Mine Action

Vietnam is heavily contaminated by explosive remnants of war (ERW), mainly unexploded ordnance (UXO) and mostly dating back to the war with the United States (US) in the 1960s and first half of the 1970s. This includes among the most widespread and extensive contamination from cluster munition remnants in the world. There is, however, no precise figure for the extent of contamination remaining.[1]

In 2011, seven donors contributed US$7.9 million for clearance and victim assistance.[2]

In 2011, as in previous years, Vietnam did not report national contributions to mine action or publish any details of land released through clearance or technical survey. Nevertheless, various sources indicate national spending may be significant. In April 2010, Vietnam released its 2010–2025 National Mine Action Plan. Although the plan did not include projected costs, a media article at the time of the plan’s release reported Vietnam “annually invests hundreds of billions of dong on disposing UXO and supporting victims.”[3] In 2011, the commander of the Army Engineering Corps of the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) reported in an interview with the Monitor that Vietnam spent US$89 million in 2009 and around US$100 million in 2010 on mine action.[4] No comparable figures are available for 2011.

The lack of transparency and legislative oversight also makes difficulties in tracking government expenditures for mine action. There is no national mine action budget. The government of Vietnam budget structure involves a combination of national and provincial revenue sources from taxes, fees, bonds, and state-connected “private” firms. In Vietnam, the Ministry of Defense is a self-contained military-industrial complex in which profit-making entities (road construction, telecoms, manufacturing, etc.) subsidize the ministry budget. The Engineering Command and army firms receive payment as revenue which the Engineering Command must collect and compile the data. Still, research conducted by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) has found that as many as six central provinces in 2011 spent an estimated US$4 million on mine action. Additionally, based on 2009–2010 data government and private investor funds could account for as much as an estimated 90% of mine clearance in Vietnam. Like other affected countries such as Afghanistan, Angola, and Cambodia where large investments are being made in public infrastructure, Vietnam is also improving its infrastructure through investments in transportation and poverty reduction, which requires a parallel investment in demining, of which little information is available.[5]

International contributions: 2011[6]

Donor

Sector

Amount (National currency)

Amount ($)

US

Clearance, victim assistance

$3,499,000

3,499,000

Norway

Clearance, victim assistance

NOK9,980,000

1,781,444

Germany

Clearance, victim assistance

€916,378

1,276,606

UK

Clearance

£506,452

812,501

Australia

Victim assistance

A$250,000

258,300

Ireland

Clearance

€115,000

160,207

Taiwan

Victim assistance

US$100,000

100,000

Total

 

 

7,888,058

Thematic contributions in 2011 (US$)

Sector

Amount

Clearance

6,161,681

Victim assistance

1,726,377

Total

7,888,058

Summary of contributions in 2007–2011 (US$)[7]

Year

Amount

2011

7,888,058

2010

7,073,255

2009

4,197,447

2008

7,637,404

2007

3,948,658

Total

30,744,822

 


 

 



[1] See ICBL-CMC, Country Profile: Vietnam: Mine Action,” 1 October 2011.

[2] Letter from Yang Chin-Tien, Minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 9 March 2012; telephone interview with Cheng Xiang-Yun, Vice Representative, Vice Representative of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office, Hanoi, Vietnam; Response to Monitor questionnaire by Christine Pahlman, Mine Action Coordinator, AusAID, 24 April 2012; Ireland Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 30 April 2012; Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2012; and by Hannah Binci, Security and Justice Team, Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department, DfID, 9 May 2012; US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2011,” Washington, DC, July 2012; and Response to Monitor questionnaire by Lt.-Col. Klaus Koppetsch, Desk Officer Mine Action, German Federal Foreign Office, 20 April 2012.

[3] “PM approves programme on unexploded ordnance,” Vietnam News (Hanoi), 29 April 2010, www.vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn. The equivalent of VND100 billion is approximately $5.28 million. Average exchange rate for 2009: US$1=VND17,493.10. Oanda, www.oanda.com.

[4] Interview with Sr. Col. Phan Duc Tuan, Deputy Commander, Army Engineering Command, People’s Army of Vietnam, in Geneva, 30 June 2011.

[5] Email from Ted Paterson, Head, Strategic Management, GICHD, 12 September 2012; and Ted Paterson, “Financing Mine Action in Vietnam,” Presented at Mine Action Donor Roundtable Meeting, Hanoi, 5 December 2011.

[6] Exchange rates for 2011: A$1 = US$1.0332; €1 = US$1.3931; NOK5.6022 = US$1; £1 = US$1.6043. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2012.