Burundi

Last Updated: 31 October 2011

Mine Ban Policy

Commitment to the Mine Ban Treaty

Mine Ban Treaty status

State Party

National implementation measures

Law No.1/30 entered into force on 10 October 2008

Transparency reporting

30 April 2010

Key developments

More than 100 antipersonnel mines were turned in during a civilian disarmament program

Policy

The Republic of Burundi signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 22 October 2003, becoming a State Party on 1 April 2004.

A national implementation law, Law No. 1/30, was passed by the legislature in September 2008, and took effect on 10 October 2008.[1] It includes penal sanctions against the use of antipersonnel mines.[2]

Burundi did not submit its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report due 30 April 2011. It has submitted six previous reports.[3]

In November–December 2010, Burundi participated in the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva. Burundi also attended the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva in 2011. It made statements on victim assistance and mine clearance at both meetings.  

Burundi is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.

Production, transfer, use, and stockpiling

Burundi has stated that it has never produced antipersonnel mines.[4] It is not known to have exported antipersonnel mines.

Since the Mine Ban Treaty entered into force for Burundi on 1 April 2004, there have been no confirmed instances of use of antipersonnel mines by the army.[5] There have been no confirmed instances of use of antipersonnel mines by rebel forces since May 2006, when negotiations to end hostilities began. Prior to May 2006, the government accused the National Forces of Liberation (Forces Nationales de Libération, FNL) of sporadic mine use.[6]

Burundi completed the destruction of its stockpile of antipersonnel mines on 17 March 2008, ahead of its treaty-mandated deadline of 1 April 2008. It destroyed a total of 664 mines, including 591 POMZ-2M and 73 TS-50 mines.[7] The 664 mines destroyed exceeded the 610 reported as stockpiled as of April 2007.[8]

In June 2010, Burundi confirmed it was retaining two POMZ-2M and two TS-50 mines for training purposes.[9]

During a civilian disarmament campaign from July–October 2009, 28 antipersonnel mines were surrendered by the population and subsequently destroyed by Mines Advisory Group (MAG).[10] Burundi later reported that its police forces recovered another 76 antipersonnel mines during the civilian disarmament campaign. The mines were destroyed with technical assistance from MAG on 16 June 2010.[11]

MAG also continued to report the discovery and destruction of previously unknown stocks of antipersonnel mines.[12] From April–May 2010, MAG reported the collection of three antipersonnel mines in its work to remove and destroy surplus small arms and light weapons in Bubanza, Bujumbura Mairie, Bujumbura Rural, and Cibitoke provinces in western Burundi.[13]

 



[1] Statement of Burundi, Ninth Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 24 November 2008.

[2] Law No. 1/30 on the national implementation of the 1997 Ottawa Convention. Those prosecuted for breaking this law will face either a prison sentence of between five and 15 years, a fine ranging from BIF5,000,000 to BIF15,000,000 (US$4,150 to $12,450), or both. In cases where a mine has caused fatalities, anybody convicted of breaking this law would face a life sentence. In addition, the law indicates national procedures to submit Article 7 reports and to report on mine action, mine risk education, and victim assistance activities. Average exchange rate for 2009: BIF1=US$0.00083. Oanda, www.oanda.com.

[3] Previous reports were submitted on 30 April 2010 (covering the period from 30 April 2009 to 30 April 2010), 30 April 2009, 1 July 2008 (covering the two-year period from 30 April 2006 to 30 April 2008), 30 April 2006, 9 August 2005, and 8 November 2004. The November 2004 report is not posted on the UN website, but the Monitor has a copy.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form E, 8 November 2004; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form E, 9 August 2005.

[5] The Monitor reported credible allegations of use of antipersonnel mines by both government and rebel forces in the past, see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 234–237. Burundi officials denied allegations against government forces.

[6] See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, pp. 234–235.

[7] Twelve of the POMZ-2M mines were from former rebel National Council for the Defense of Democracy-Forces for the Defense of Democracy (Conseil National pour la Défense de la Démocratie-Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie) stocks, and the rest were from army stocks. After stockpile destruction in 2008 and 2009, Burundi stated that the total number of mines held by the FNL, the last remaining rebel group, remained to be confirmed. The FNL and the government signed a Cessation of Hostilities Agreement on 26 May 2008. In April 2009, FNL combatants began demobilization and the surrender of weapons to the African Union Special Task Force. There have been no reports of antipersonnel mines being handed in. See Landmine Monitor Report 2009, pp. 230–231.

[8] Statement of Burundi, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 23 April 2007. In this statement, Burundi informed States Parties that, after reviewing its mine inventory, it concluded that it had 610 antipersonnel mines in stock, and not the 1,212 previously declared on several occasions.

[9] Statement of Burundi, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 21 June 2010; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, 30 April 2010. In October–November 2010, MAG trained four Civilian Defence Staff in demining to EOD (explosive ordnance disposal) level 1 certification. It is not known if the retained mines were a part of this training.

[10] The campaign was run by the Burundian National Commission for Civilian Disarmament and Against the Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons. The mines were all POMZ-2Ms. See Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2010; email from Julie Claveau, Country Program Manager, MAG, 10 February 2010; “Burundians hand in thousands of weapons,” IRIN, 4 November 2009, www.irinnews.org; and UN Integrated Mission in Burundi, “Burundi Désarmement. La population continue à remettre volontairement les armes” (“Burundi Disarmament. The population continues to voluntarily hand in weapons”), 25 July 2009, www.binub.turretdev.com.

[11] Statement of Burundi, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 21 June 2010. The mines were reported as 55 TS-50; eight PMA-2; six POMZ-2M; and seven igniters, and were destroyed in Mudubugu. See also Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2010.

[12] Email from Julie Claveau, MAG, 10 February 2010. Burundi reported that in April 2009 a cache of 41 TS-50 antipersonnel mines was discovered in the village of Mabayi, Cibitoke province. It said the mines were being held for the time being by MAG, which indicated that the mines were subsequently destroyed. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms B and D, 30 April 2009; and email from Julie Claveau, MAG, 3 August 2009.

[13] MAG, “MAG Burundi Programme Update 01 April–31 May 2010,” www.maginternational.org.


Last Updated: 16 July 2013

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions

Convention on Cluster Munitions status

State Party

Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings

Attended Third Meeting of States Parties in Oslo, Norway in September 2012, intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2013, and a regional meeting in Lomé, Togo in May 2013

Key developments

Preparing national implementation legislation

Policy

The Republic of Burundi signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008 and ratified on 25 September 2009. It was among the first 30 ratifications to trigger the convention’s entry into force on 1 August 2010.

In April 2013, a government official informed the CMC that Burundi intended to expand its existing national implementation legislation for the Mine Ban Treaty to address cluster munitions and said that steps to that end were being undertaken in parliament.[1] In May 2013, another government official said that national implementation legislation was in preparation.[2] In September 2012, Burundi reported that the process of developing a legal framework to incorporate the convention’s provisions into national legislation would “soon be initiated.”[3] In May 2012, a government official stated that a group had been convened to draft implementing legislation.[4]

At the Third Meeting of States Parties in September 2012, Burundi reported that a national operational structure has been put in place to carry out the implementation of the provisions of the Convention on Cluster Munitions and other related treaties that Burundi has joined, such as the Mine Ban Treaty.[5]

Burundi submitted its initial Article 7 report in early 2011, but as of 25 June 2013 still had not submitted annual updated reports for 2012 or 2013.[6]

Burundi participated in the Oslo Process that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, including the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008 where it supported a comprehensive ban on cluster munitions.[7]

Burundi continued to actively engage in the work of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2012 and the first half of 2013. It attended the convention’s Third Meeting of States Parties in Oslo, Norway in September 2012, the intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2013, and a regional meeting on universalization of the convention held in Lomé, Togo in May 2013.

Burundi publicly promoted universalization of the convention several times in 2012. At the Third Meeting of States Parties, Burundi encouraged all countries that have not yet done so to join the convention and pledged that it would “spare no effort to educate other countries to ratify” as a way to strengthen security in the region and the world.[8]

Burundi has not made a national statement condemning Syria’s use of cluster munitions, but it voted in favor of a UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on 15 May 2013 that strongly condemned “the use by the Syrian authorities of...cluster munitions.”[9] It also endorsed the Lomé Strategy on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions at the regional meeting held in May 2013, which expresses “grave concern over the recent and on-going use of cluster munitions” and calls for the immediate end to the use of these weapons.[10]

Burundi has expressed its views on certain important issues related to the interpretation and implementation of the convention. In March 2012, a Ministry of Public Security official said that Burundi considers assistance with prohibited acts in joint military operations to be prohibited by the convention and it also considers the transit and foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions on or across the territories of States Parties to be prohibited.[11]

Burundi is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) as of 13 July 2012 after ratifying two of its protocols.[12]

Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling

Burundi has stated that is has never used, produced, stockpiled, or transferred cluster munitions, nor has it any intention of acquiring them.[13] In 2011, Burundi declared that it has no stockpile of cluster munitions, including for training or research purposes.[14]

 



[1] CMC-Togo meeting with Désiré Nshimirimana, Second Vice-President of the Permanent National Commission for the fight against the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (CNAP), in Geneva, 17 April 2013.

[2] Statement of Burundi, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 22 May 2013. Notes by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV).

[3] Statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 12 September 2012, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/09/GEV-Burundi.pdf.

[4] Statement of Burundi, Accra Regional Conference on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Accra, 29 May 2012, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/06/Session-II_Statement-Burundi.pdf. Government officials first indicated in August 2010 that such a group would be established. Email from Côme Niyongabo, Handicap International, following a telephone interview with Fabien Ndayishimiye, Legal Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3 August 2010.

[5] In this context, Burundi said that awareness-raising sessions for the civilian population on the dangers of explosive remnants of war had helped to identify contaminated areas and ensure the subsequent clearance and destruction of unexploded ordnance and obsolete munitions. Statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 12 September 2012, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/09/GEV-Burundi.pdf.

[6] Burundi’s initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report is undated and does not indicate the reporting period. It is comprised of a statement and not completed forms.

[7] For details on Burundi’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 49–50.

[8] Statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 12 September 2012, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/09/GEV-Burundi.pdf.

[9] “The situation in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/67/L.63, 15 May 2013, www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2013/ga11372.doc.htm.

[10]Lomé Strategy on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2013/04/Lome-Strategy-for-the-Universalization-of-the-CCM-Final-Draft_En.pdf.

[11] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Denis Gahiru, Director General, Civil Protection and Humanitarian Action Against Mines and Explosive Remnants of War, Ministry of Public Security, 20 March 2012.

[12] Burundi ratified the original Protocol II on Mines, Booby-traps, and Other Devices and Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War to become a State Party to the CCW framework.

[13] Statement of Burundi, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 22 May 2013. Notes by AOAV; statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 12 September 2012, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2012/09/GEV-Burundi.pdf; statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 29 June 2011. Notes by AOAV; and statement of Burundi, Convention on Cluster Munitions First Meeting of States Parties, Vientiane, 10 November 2010.

[14] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, 2011.


Last Updated: 30 October 2013

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

Mines

At the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties in November 2011, the Republic of Burundi declared it had completed clearance of all mines, fulfilling its Article 5 obligations, following the clearance of 11 mined areas by Mines Advisory Group (MAG). In December, however, the Minister of Energy and Mines requested assistance in surveying Suspected Hazardous Areas (SHAs) around electrical pylons; consequently, in May 2012, Burundi reported at the intersessional Standing Committee meetings that it still had suspected mined areas to release.[1] In 2013, Burundi repeated that it had located some SHAs near electrical pylons and in May requested assistance from the Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD) to complete non-technical surveys and clearance of antipersonnel mines.[2]

As an indicator of the assumed remaining contamination, FSD reported finding four antipersonnel mines per electrical pylon from 2005–2008; Direction de l'Action Humanitaire contre les Mines et Engins non explosés (DAHMI), the national mine action center, reported just 80 antipersonnel mines have been found from 2006–2013.[3]

Explosive remnants of war

The precise extent of contamination with explosive remnants of war (ERW) is unknown, although MAG regularly reported encountering ERW in its operations.[4] In October–November 2010, MAG trained four Civil Protection staff in demining to explosive ordnance disposal level 1 certification.[5] In 2006, an assessment by the United States (US) Department of State’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) identified poor ammunition storage and handling conditions in Burundi as serious risks.[6] MAG has worked with Burundi’s military and police to strengthen their Physical Security and Stockpile Management capacity since 2007.[7]

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2013

National Mine Action Authority

General Directorate for Civil Protection

Mine action center

DAHMI

International demining operators

MAG

National demining operators

Armed forces; and Civil Protection demining team

Mine action in Burundi is under the authority of the General Directorate for Civil Protection located within the Ministry of Public Security. On 15 May 2009, DAHMI was officially established under the same ministry, marking the end of active UNDP support. DAHMI is responsible for the coordination of mine action activities.[8]

Land Release

According to DAHMI, no mine clearance was conducted in 2012.[9] As of May 2013, Burundi did not have any clearance capacity although MAG had trained a Civil Protection Demining team in 2008. Dan Church Aid (DCA) and FSD closed their mine clearance programs in 2008.[10]

Survey in 2011–2012

A survey of SHAs around electricity pylons in October 2012, conducted by DAHMI with technical oversight by MAG, identified an unspecified number of SHAs in Bururi, Bujumbura, and Bubanza provinces.[11]

Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty, Burundi is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 April 2014.

It appears Burundi prematurely declared it had met its Article 5 obligations when it declared it was mine free in November 2011. Burundi reported in May 2012 that it needed further survey to confirm SHAs around a few electrical pylons, but it still planned to meet its 1 April 2014 deadline.[12] Survey conducted in the SHAs in October 2012 identified further mined areas, but the extent remains unclear. As of May 2013, Burundi was waiting for a response from FSD on assistance.

 



[1] Statement of Burundi, 11th Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 28 November 2011; MAG, “Why MAG is needed in Burundi,” April 2012; and statement of Burundi, intersessional Standing Committee Meeting on Mine Clearance, 23 May 2012.

[2] Statement of Burundi, intersessional Standing Committee Meeting on Mine Clearance, 27 May 2013.

[3] Ibid.; and FSD, “FSD de-mining programme in Burundi PART 1,” YouTube.com, 22 May 2008.

[4] Email from Julie Claveau, Programme Manager, MAG, 10 February 2010.

[6] Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), “Mine Action and Armed Violence Reduction Burundi Case Study: MAG,” September 2012.

[7] MAG, “Why MAG is needed in Burundi,” April 2012.

[8] GICHD, “Burundi: Synthese d’informations de l’action contre les mines et les restes explosifs de guerre (dont sous-munitions)” (“Burundi: Overview of information on mine action and ERW - including submunitions”), Second Seminar of African Francophone Seminar on Mine and ERW Action, Dakar, Senegal, 2–4 November 2009.

[9] Statement of Burundi, intersessional Standing Committee Meeting on Mine Clearance, 27 May 2013.

[10] DCA, “No More Mine Action,” 26 September 2009; and email from Alex Griffiths, Director of Operations, FSD, 24 February 2009.

[11] Email from Nicole Ntagabo, Project Manager, MAG Burundi, 26 November 2012.

[12] Statement of Burundi, intersessional Standing Committee Meeting on Mine Clearance, 27 May 2013.


Last Updated: 25 November 2013

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Summary findings

·         A lack of financial resources prevented authorities from developing a national database of mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) victims and their needs, as had been planned for 2012

·         Fees for service were a barrier for many survivors seeking to access physical rehabilitation

·         Regular meetings of the multisectoral victim assistance committee improved coordination, including by linking implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty and the national law on the rights of persons with disabilities; however, progress implementing the national victim assistance plan was prevented by a lack of funds

Victim assistance commitments

The Republic of Burundi is responsible for a significant number of survivors of landmines and ERW who are in need. Burundi has made commitments to provide victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty.

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2012

1,561 mine/ERW casualties

Casualties in 2012

0 (2011: 0)

In 2012, the Monitor identified no new casualties from mines/ERW in Burundi. While this is in line with annual casualty figures that have been declining since a peak in 2005, it is likely that casualties may have occurred but were not recorded, since the Humanitarian Department for Mine/Unexploded Ordnance Action (Direction de l’Action Humanitaire contre les Mines et Engins non explosés, DAHMI) did not collect any casualty data after 2009.[1] The last confirmed mine and ERW casualties occurred in 2009.

In June 2010, Burundi estimated that the total number of casualties was 6,000.[2] However, no further details were available. While DAHMI recognized that there was a need to conduct a survey to evaluate the exact number of mine/ERW victims in Burundi and identify their needs, no resources were available in 2012 to do this.[3] By 2011, there were 1,561 casualties officially identified in DAHMI’s database.[4]

Victim assistance

There were estimated to be 5,000 survivors in Burundi.[5]

Victim assistance in 2012

In 2012, implementation of the National Victim Assistance Action Plan 2011–2014 did not follow the established timeline.[6] While the Interministerial and Inter-sectoral Coordinating Committee for Victim Assistance met several times throughout the year, little progress was made in implementing the Action Plan due to a lack of funding. Victim assistance stakeholders did not note any major changes in the availability or accessibility of services for survivors in 2012, although donor funding available for victim assistance was reported to have increased.[7]

Assessing victim assistance needs

The National Victim Assistance Action Plan, adopted in 2011, includes a target to conduct a qualitative survey on persons with disabilities and their needs by the end of the first half of 2012. By the end of the year, DAHMI had developed a plan to build the national database of victims and to survey the needs of survivors.[8] However, the database was not developed nor was the survey implemented due to a lack of funding.[9]

Victim assistance coordination[10]

Government coordinating body/focal point

DAHMI

Coordinating mechanism

Interministerial and Inter-sectoral Coordinating Committee for Victim Assistance

Plan

National Victim Assistance Action Plan 2011–2014

Burundi’s National Victim Assistance Action Plan 2011–2014 aims to improve victim assistance across seven thematic areas: immediate and continued health care; physical rehabilitation; psychosocial and peer support; inclusive education; social and economic inclusion, including community-based rehabilitation; inclusive development; and data collection, legislation and policies, and coordination.[11]

The Interministerial and Inter-sectoral Coordinating Committee for Victim Assistance was founded in 2011 to monitor and report on the implementation of the Action Plan, to define public policies to improve the delivery of services, to link relevant ministries, agencies, service providers, and donors, as well as to support the government in responding to its commitments under national law for the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. In 2012, the committee held five meetings; however, due to a lack of funding, it was unable to implement the Action Plan.[12] Meetings were facilitated by DAHMI and included representatives of the ministries of national solidarity, education, defense, public health, and culture, as well as representatives of NGOs and disabled persons’ organizations.[13]

Burundi provided information on victim assistance activities in Form J of its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report, submitted for the period from April 2006 to April 2012.[14] Burundi gave updates on victim assistance at the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in May 2012 and at the Twelfth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in December 2012.[15]

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

Representatives of the Union of Persons with Disabilities of Burundi (Union des Personnes Handicapées du Burundi, UPHB) and of the Center for Training and Development of Ex-Combatants (CEDAC), an organization with survivors included within its membership, participated in meetings of the Coordinating Committee for Victim Assistance in 2012.[16] Some survivors were involved in the implementation of economic inclusion and peer support projects through NGO service providers.[17]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities: 2012[18]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2012

Ministry of National Solidarity

Government

Physical rehabilitation; social and professional reinsertion

Ongoing

CEDAC

National NGO

Economic inclusion (micro-credit), psychosocial assistance and advocacy

Ongoing

UPHB

National NGO

Advocacy and economic inclusion; referrals for other services

Ongoing

Handicap International (HI)

International NGO

Disability rights, physical rehabilitation, capacity development of disabled persons’ organizations, socio-economic inclusion

Ongoing

ICRC

International organization

Support for physical rehabilitation at the Saint Kizito Institute (ISK); donation of materials, components and equipment and management training and assistance

Opened a dormitory at the institute and reimbursed for lodging costs from August; provided training in financial management and cost recovery

MULINDI/ Japan One Love Project

International NGO

Physical rehabilitation and training of health professionals

Ongoing

While training programs continue to improve the capacity of staff, access to appropriate physical rehabilitation services remained difficult in 2012 for most of those in need. The greatest obstacles for accessing services remained the lack of facilities and professionals and the cost of treatment, since users had to pay for the services.[19]

The ICRC continued its collaboration with the ISK in Bujumbura, which targeted services for people in the areas of Burundi that were the most severely contaminated by weapons. In 2012, to improve the accessibility of services the ICRC finalized the construction of a dormitory at the ISK and began reimbursing the costs of accommodation and meals for patients. Throughout the year, the ICRC continued to provide management assistance and training, specifically in calculating the costs of services and in cost recovery for ISK directors. By the end of 2012, the ISK took over the full financial responsibilities to cover all related running costs for its physical rehabilitation services.[20]

HI continued an economic inclusion initiative in 2012 in five provinces. Since the project was launched in 2011, it has worked with 1,618 former combatants with disabilities including mine/ERW survivors, although no data was available on the number of survivors included.[21] The project was specifically designed for former combatants with disabilities and supported access to medical care, including physical rehabilitation services, psychosocial support, and social and economic inclusion services.[22]

In 2012, CEDAC continued implementing an economic inclusion project and providing psychosocial support for survivors through a peer support initiative in three provinces. The economic inclusion project focused primarily on women with disabilities from mine/ERW incidents.[23] Funding for the projects of CEDAC was reported to have increased in 2012, with funding mobilized from Action on Armed Violence and UNDP for the activities.[24]

The constitution prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities. However, the government lacked the capacity and funding to promote or protect the rights of persons with disabilities. The government did not enact legislation or otherwise mandate access to buildings, information, or government services for persons with disabilities.[25]

Burundi signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on 26 April 2007 and ratification remained under consideration as of the end of 2012.[26]

 



[1] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, Director, DAHMI, 20 March 2013; and by Eric Niragira, Director, CEDAC, 14 March 2013; interview with Nkeshimana Nicodème, Director, DAHMI, in Geneva, 16 March 2010; and interview with Generose Ngendanganya, Deputy General Manager, Ministry of Public Service, in Geneva, 23 June 2010.

[2] Statement of Burundi, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education, and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 23 June 2010; and statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.

[3] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013.

[4] National Victim Assistance Action Plan, 2011–2014, January 2011, p.17.

[5] This figure includes the 1,300 survivors identified as of the end of 2008. Interview with Nkeshimana Nicodème, DAHMI, in Geneva 16 March 2010; and email from Désiré Irambona, DAHMI, 11 April 2011.

[6] Statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.

[7] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013; and by Caroline Duconseille, Program Director, HI, 22 March 2013.

[8] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013.

[9] Ibid.

[10] National Victim Assistance Action Plan, 2011–2014, January 2011; statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Caroline Duconseille, HI, 22 March 2013.

[11] National Victim Assistance Action Plan, 2011–2014, January 2011.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013; and ICBL-CMC, Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor Report 2011 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada: October 2012), www.the-monitor.org.

[13] Statement of Burundi, Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Mine Ban Treaty, Phnom Penh, 29 November 2011.

[14] Mine Ban Treaty, Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2012.

[15] Statement of Burundi, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 23 May 2012; and statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.

[16] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013.

[17] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013; and statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.

[18] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire by Léonce Musavyi, DAHMI, 20 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire by Caroline Duconseille, HI, 22 March 2013; statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012; and ICRC Physical Rehabilitation Programme (PRP), “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, pp. 10, 28–29.

[19] Statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013.

[20] ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, pp. 28–29.

[21] Response to questionnaire by Caroline Duconseille, HI, 22 March 2013.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Eric Niragira, CEDAC, 14 March 2013.

[24] Ibid.

[25] United States Department of State, “2012 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Burundi,” Washington, DC, 19 April 2013; and statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.

[26] UN, “National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21,” Geneva, 21 November 2012; and statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 3–7 December 2012.


Last Updated: 30 October 2013

Support for Mine Action

At the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties in 2011, the Republic of Burundi declared that it had completed its Article 5 obligations. However, it subsequently reported at the 2013 intersessional Standing Committee meetings that it still had suspected mined areas to release and surveying was ongoing.[1]

In 2012, Switzerland contributed CHF70,000 (US$74,651) to Mines Advisory Group towards mine clearance in Burundi.[2]

Burundi did not report any contributions to its mine action program in 2012.

Summary of international contributions: 2008–2012[3]

Year

Amount ($)

2012

74,651

2011

193,676

2010

182,120

2009

278,700

2008

1,094,632

Total

1,823,779

 

 



[1] Statement of Burundi, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Geneva, 27 May 2013.

[2] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Claudia Moser, Section for Multilateral Peace Policy, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, 22 March 2013. Average exchange rate for 2012: CHF0.9377=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.

[3] See Landmine Monitor reports 2008–2011; and ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Burundi: Support for Mine Action,” 10 September 2012.