South Sudan

Last Updated: 25 November 2013

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

State Party

National implementation measures

No measures taken yet

Key developments

Provided initial Article 7 report in December 2012 and an updated report in April 2013

Policy

Less than six months after becoming an independent state on 9 July 2011, the Republic of South Sudan joined the Mine Ban Treaty on 11 November 2011 through the rarely used process of “succession.” According to the UN Office of Legal Affairs, the Mine Ban Treaty took effect for South Sudan on 9 July 2011, the date of state independence and succession.[1]

In December 2012, South Sudan reported that it is aware of its obligations under Article 9 of the Mine Ban Treaty to “take all appropriate legal, administrative and other measures, including the imposition of penal sanctions, to prevent and suppress” any prohibited activity. While no legal measures have been taken yet, South Sudan said it is “committed to doing so in the future and to reporting on these measures.”[2] In April 2013, South Sudan again reported that it is aware of its Article 9 obligation, but has not yet taken any legal measures.[3]

South Sudan submitted its initial Article 7 report for the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 2012, covering the period from 11 July 2011 to 1 September 2012.[4] It provided an updated Article 7 report in April 2013 for the period from September 2012–April 2013.

South Sudan participated in the Twelfth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in December 2012, where it made a general statement and spoke on mine clearance, victim assistance, and stockpile destruction. South Sudan attended the intersessional Standing Committee meetings held in Geneva in May 2013, where it spoke on compliance and stockpile destruction.

Production and transfer

In December 2012, South Sudan declared “There are not and never have been anti-personnel mine production facilities in South Sudan.”[5] There is no information available on past transfers.

Stockpiling and destruction

In accordance with the provisions of Article 4 of the Mine Ban Treaty, South Sudan must destroy any stockpiles of antipersonnel mines as soon as possible and no later than 9 July 2015.

Before independence, the southern-based rebel movement the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A) stockpiled and used antipersonnel mines.[6]

In its December 2012 Article 7 report, South Sudan reported that it had destroyed 10,566 stockpiled antipersonnel mines and also reported the discovery of previously unknown stocks of antipersonnel mines in former camps of the Sudan Armed Forces, stating that it had discovered four PMN antipersonnel mines that would be destroyed. The report also listed 30 different types of antipersonnel mines that have been destroyed in the course of mine clearance operations.[7]

In its April 2013 Article 7 report, South Sudan declared that the government destroyed 6,000 stockpiled antipersonnel mines in March 2008 and no longer had a stockpile. The report did not mention the four newly-discovered mines declared in 2012.[8] The National Mine Action Authority (NMAA) issued a letter confirming that the previously reported statement made by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs at the Eleventh Meeting of the State Parties in 2012, regarding discovery of new stockpiles of antipersonnel mines, was made in error. Contrary to the statement made, the Deputy Minister had actually intended to convey to the international community that new mine fields had been discovered in the states of Jonglei, Upper Nile, and Unity.[9]

In November 2011, South Sudan stated that it is not retaining any antipersonnel mines for training.[10] This was confirmed in the December 2012 and April 2013 Article 7 reports.[11]

Use

During 2011, there were several incidents in which landmines were apparently laid in South Sudan, including in the states of Jonglei, Unity, and Upper Nile (see below); however the Monitor could not determine who was responsible for the mine-laying and to what extent antipersonnel mines, as opposed to antivehicle mines, were being laid. In 2012, there were no new allegations of landmine use in South Sudan, but further allegations of new mine use were made in the first half of 2013.

The armed forces of the Republic of Sudan and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army-North (SPLA-N), the armed opposition group operating in the Nuba Mountains, have been engaged in armed conflict since July 2011. There were reports of mine stockpiles being captured by the SPLM-N in February 2012 in the Republic of Sudan’s South Kordofan state, north of the border with South Sudan, which is home to some Nuba communities which supported the South during the civil war.[12] During fighting in Heglig in April 2012, weapons that included antipersonnel mines were reportedly seized by combatants from an occupied Sudan Armed Forces base; these combatants included members of the regular army of the Republic of South Sudan and Justice & Equality Movement (JEM), a non-state armed group (NSAG) in Sudan.[13] Geneva Call said JEM denied seizing any antipersonnel mines and that a representative of the South Sudan Mine Action Authority stated that a committee would be sent to investigate the allegation.[14] In June 2011, Brigadier Jurkuch Barach, chair of the Southern Sudan Mine Action Authority, expressed concern at new civilian deaths from what were, in his opinion, newly-laid antipersonnel mines and antivehicle mines.[15] A representative of the UN Mine Action Office (UNMAO) Southern Sudan told media that evidence indicates rebel militia groups were laying mines and said, “We’ve seen an increase in mine incidents and mine accidents over the past six months or so and in many areas we think there are a lot of alleged cases of re-mining. We can’t prove it because we haven’t seen it but anecdotal evidence indicates that these are newly laid, not old mines.”[16]

In 2011, the ICBL expressed concern at “alarming reports” of new landmine use by NSAGs in South Sudan.[17] In May 2012, the ICBL again drew States Parties’ attention to apparent new mine-laying in 2011 in South Sudan, but noted it was not possible to determine who was responsible or whether antipersonnel mines in addition to antivehicle mines had been laid.[18]

The NMAA conducted a fact-finding mission in June–July 2013 to engage with civil authorities in the states of Jonglei, Upper Nile, Unity, and Western Bahr El Ghazal. The NMAA engaged in discussions with the Governor and the Deputy Governor as well as the Sector and Division Commanders from the SPLA. Both the civil authorities as well as the SPLA denied allegations of being involved in new mine laying activities. However, the SPLA confirmed that new mines had indeed been laid by rebel forces in Unity state and also in Jonglei state in the areas of Khorflus and Khorwai. A formal report is being prepared by the NMAA to include findings from the fact-finding mission.[19]

Jonglei state use allegations

In March 2011, the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) regional coordinator for Southern Sudan was quoted in media reports saying that forces loyal to George Athor, a former deputy chief of staff of the SPLA, had used mines in northern Jonglei state.[20] In February 2011, SPLA spokesperson Philip Aguer told media that Athor’s forces were “planting land mines.”[21] According to the SPLA, “two army trucks were blown up by land mines near the town of Fangak in Jonglei state.”[22]

In July 2013, after a visit to Jonglei state, Refugees International issued a report that stated “multiple UN and NGO sources have…reported that members of the SPLA have been laying anti-personnel mines in civilian areas. However the UN Mine Action Service has been unable to conduct an investigation that would confirm this.”[23] Refugees International informed the ICBL that the mine use was in the Pibor in the southeast of Jonglei state in South Sudan.[24] The Small Arms Survey, a Swiss NGO, documented several seizures of mines in Jonglei state and Unity state in 2011.[25]

Unity state use allegations

In Unity state, there were several reports of antivehicle mine use in 2011, claiming multiple casualties including in May,[26] August,[27] September,[28] and October.[29] The Small Arms Survey documented newly-laid Chinese manufactured T-72 antivehicle mines, reportedly laid by the South Sudan Liberation Army (SSLA) around Mayom, Unity state, on 29 October 2011, with the lot number 07-81-6902.[30] In November 2011, a UN Mine Action and Coordination Centre (UNMACC) representative told media that routes leading into and out of the state capital Bentiu were suspected to be mined.[31] In December 2011, a UNMACC representative said that it was increasing efforts to unblock aid and trade routes in Unity state because “the re-mining has shut down most of the state.”[32]

In September 2011, the South Sudan Liberation Army/Movement (SSLA/M), an armed opposition group in South Sudan that opposes the government of the Republic of South Sudan, issued a press release denying responsibility for landmine use in Unity state and blaming the SPLA “for planting anti-personnel mines which are now hampering free movements of civilians in Unity State.” The statement claimed that the governor of Unity state, Major-General Taban Deng Gai, had “ordered the SPLA army to plant Anti-personnel mines in major highways of the state to harm civilians and blame the SSLM/A.”[33] In November 2011, SPLA Major-General Mangar Buong accused the government of Sudan of funding the rebel groups to destabilize South Sudan by planting mines.[34]

In January 2012, a former senior SSLA member interviewed by Amnesty International admitted that their forces had laid antivehicle landmines on Unity state roads expected to be used by SPLA forces, but denied that SSLA forces had laid antipersonnel landmines.[35]

Upper Nile state use allegations

In June 2013, a resident in Sudan’s White Nile state told a South Sudan media outlet that “armed rebels” planted landmines in an area from Wadakona, a village in South Sudan’s Upper Nile state to the border with Sudan’s White Nile state. After a farmer died when his tractor hit a mine, the listener said, “People are now avoiding using vehicles for fear of landmines.”[36]

In Upper Nile state, an antipersonnel mine was found in Malakal in April 2011. It is unknown who laid it, but there has been conflict in the area between the SPLA and a Shilluk armed group under Commander John Olony, a rebel SPLA officer.[37]

 

 



[1] See, www.apminebanconvention.org/states-parties-to-the-convention/south-sudan/. The Republic of the Sudan signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December 1997 and ratified on 13 October 2003, becoming a State Party on 1 April 2004. Under the “succession” process, a newly independent state may declare that it will abide by a treaty that was applicable to it prior to its independence.

[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, December 2012, Form A. In Sudan, a Mine Action Law adopted by Presidential Decree #51 on 31 March 2010 prohibits antipersonnel mines and includes penalties for violations.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, April 2013, Form A.

[4] The report was originally due by 5 January 2012.

[5] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, April 2013, Form E. In November 2011, South Sudan informed States Parties that it does not possess facilities for the production of landmines. Statement of South Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 28 November 2011. Notes by the ICBL.

[6] In 1996, the SPLM/A declared a moratorium on antipersonnel mine use and reasserted its pledge to not use mines in 1999. See Landmine Monitor Report 2000, p. 182. The SPLM/A subsequently signed the Geneva Call Deed of Commitment in 2001. See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 575. In January 2002, the SPLM/A and the government of Sudan signed the Nuba Mountains cease-fire agreement in which both parties agreed to stop using mines. See Landmine Monitor Report 2003, p. 534. In 2005, the SPLM/A entered into a Sudanese government of national unity and was bound by the obligations of the Mine Ban Treaty. See Landmine Monitor Report 2006, pp. 652–653.

[7] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, December 2012, Forms B and H.

[8] Ibid., April 2013, Forms B and D.

[9] Email from Lance Malin MBE, Programme Manager for South Sudan, UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS), 14 October 2013.

[10] Statement of South Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 28 November 2011. Notes by the ICBL.

[11] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, December 2012, Form D; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, April 2013, Form D.

[12] Mines were a ‘No.4’ type plastic box mine with Farsi writing on the mine bodies, contained in boxes stenciled in Arabic with “Yarmouk Industrial Complex,” a Sudanese Military Industrial Corporation subsidiary. Small Arms Survey, Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment, “Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) weapons documented in South Kordofan,” April 2012.

[13] See, Small Arms Survey, Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment, “Weapons identified in Heglig/Panthou and Bentiu,” 5 June 2012.

[14] Geneva Call said the JEM responded, “JEM forces have not taken a single mine at all from Heglig and they consider them dangerous objects and they have no use for them,” email from Adrian Goodliffe, Programme Officer – Africa, Geneva Call, 24 July 2012; and email from Geneva Call, 5 October 2012.

[15] Statement of South Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Geneva, 23 June 2011.

[16] Maggie Flick, “Landmines in Southern Sudan,” Huffington Post, 4 June 2011, citing an interview with Tim Horner, Deputy Director of the UNMAO in Southern Sudan.

[17] Statement of ICBL, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 20 June 2011.

[18] Ibid., 25 May 2012.

[19] UNMAS has been unable to independently verify the allegations due to access restrictions to the alleged sites. Email from Lance Malin MBE, UNMAS, 14 October 2013.

[20] George Athor’s forces launched an armed rebellion against the government of southern Sudan in the aftermath of the April 2010 elections. George Athor subsequently formed a breakaway movement, the South Sudan Democratic Movement/South Sudan Army (SSDM/A). UNMIS, “Near-verbatim Transcript of the Press Conference by Mr. David Gressley, UNMIS Regional Coordinator for Southern Sudan,” Miraya FM Studios, Juba, 29 March 2011.

[21]South Sudan ceasefire broken: Athor attacks Jonglei,” BBC News, 10 February 2011; and Ngor Arol Garang, “Sudan: South Sudan Army Retake Fangak from Athor Forces –SPLA,” Sudan Tribune, 10 February 2011.

[22]South Sudan clashes with Athor in Jonglei: ‘100 dead,’” BBC News, 11 February 2011.

[24] ICBL meeting with Caitlin Briggs, Refugees International, Geneva, 4 June 2013.

[25] In March 2011, the SPLA confiscated more than 250 antivehicle mines from SSDA forces loyal to George Athor in Jonglei state. The Small Arms Survey identified the mines as TM-57 and GLD-215, manufactured in Russia and China. Additional TM-57 antivehicle mines were seized from the South Sudan Liberation Army (SSLA) in April 2011, near Mayom in Unity state. The SPLA also recovered PMN-type antipersonnel mines from the SSLA around Mayom, Unity state, in June 2011. See Small Arms Survey, Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment, “Anti-tank and anti-personnel mines in Unity and Jonglei states,” 5 March 2012.

[26] A UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) security briefing noted, “According to UNDSS [UN Department of Safety and Security] reports on 13 May, three commercial vehicles (one fuel and two water tankers) hit landmines along the Bentiu-Tharjat road, close to the Guit junction” in Unity state and “two more people stepped on landmines while trying to rescue the wounded drivers.” UNOCHA, “Sudan Weekly Humanitarian Bulletin,” 6–12 May 2011. The mines were alleged to have been laid by forces loyal to Peter Gadet, a former SPLA general and now head of a new armed group in Unity state, the SSLA. Bonifacio Taban Kuich, “Three seriously injured by land mines explode in Unity State,” Sudan Tribune (Bentiu), 12 May 2011. The SSLA denied the use allegation and stated that it did not have any forces in the area and it has not used antipersonnel mines since armed conflict started in May “because it is the violation of international laws which outlawed their use.” SSLA Press release, “SSLM/A Condemns Unity State Gov’t For Planting Anti-Personnel Mines,” published by South Sudan News Agency (Mayom), 6 September 2011.

[27] Five people were killed and 21 seriously injured in two separate antivehicle mine incidents on 20–21 August 2011. The governor of Unity state condemned the mine use, which it said was carried out by rebels led by James Gai Yoach. The mine use was blamed on rebels led by James Gai Yoach, who have broken away from SSLA following Commander Peter Gadet’s acceptance of a cease-fire agreement with the government of South Sudan. Bonifacio Taba, “Landmine Blast Kills 5 in South Sudan,” Voice of America, 23 August 2011; and Bonifacio Taban Kuich, “Landmines kill 5 and injure 21 in South Sudan’s Unity state,” Sudan Tribune (Bentiu), 23 August 2011.

[28] In September 2011, four civilians were killed when the bus they were traveling in hit an antivehicle mine on a road in Mayom County in Unity state. “Amputees reap bitter fruits of separation in Sudan state,” mysinchew.com, 17 December 2011.

[29] According to Amnesty International, 20 people, including four children, were reportedly killed when the bus in which they were traveling hit an antivehicle landmine between Mayom and Mankien on 9 October 2011. Amnesty International, “South Sudan: Overshadowed Conflict,” 28 June 2012, pp. 22–23.

[30] Small Arms Survey, Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment, “Anti-tank and anti-personnel mines in Unity and Jonglei states,” 5 March 2012.

[31]Relentless Use of Landmines in South Sudan Sparks Fear,” Voice of America, 21 November 2011.

[32]Amputees reap bitter fruits of separation in Sudan state,” mysinchew.com, 17 December 2011.

[33] SSLA/M press release, “SSLA/M condemns Unity state gov’t for planting anti-personnel mines,” Sudan Tribune (Khartoum), 6 September 2011.

[34]Relentless Use of Landmines in South Sudan Sparks Fear,” Voice of America, 21 November 2011.

[35] According to the former SSLA member, “We had some landmines but we kept many of them back. We sent intelligence guys to lay down anti-tank mines, and then attract SPLA forces to them.” Amnesty International, “South Sudan: Overshadowed Conflict,” 28 June 2012, p. 23.

[36]“Landmines kill and maim civilians on Sudan - South Sudan border’: source,” Radio Tamazuj, 19 June 2013.

[37] UNMAO, “Recent Use of Landmines in South Sudan,” South Sudan Mine Action Office, 2 June 2011, p. 3.


Last Updated: 02 September 2013

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

On 9 July 2011, the Republic of South Sudan became an independent state. It has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

In May 2013, a representative of South Sudan informed a regional seminar that the government is committed to acceding to the Convention on Cluster Munitions “as soon as possible” and explained it has been unable to do so until now because of competing priorities.[1] In September 2011, South Sudan said “we do intend to join” the convention but also warned that there are “many pressing issues to address not least to capacity build all departments of government and the judiciary.”[2]

South Sudan attended the Third Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Oslo, Norway in September 2012 and intersessional meetings of the convention in Geneva in April 2013. South Sudan also participated in a regional seminar on the universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Lomé, Togo in May 2013, where it provided an update on its efforts to join the convention.

South Sudan acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty on 11 November 2011.[3]

Production, use, transfer, and stockpiling

The Monitor has no indication of any past production, export, use, or stockpiling of cluster munitions by the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A). In September 2011, South Sudan stated that it “is not a user or producer of cluster munitions.”[4] A government official informed the CMC that South Sudan does not stockpile cluster munitions.[5]

Numerous independent sources have documented the presence of cluster munition remnants, indicating that the armed forces of Sudan sporadically used air-dropped cluster munitions in southern Sudan between 1995 and 2000.[6] The UN Mine Action Coordination Centre reported that in April 2013 there were 58 known dangerous areas containing unexploded submunitions in seven states: Central Equatoria, East Equatoria, West Equatoria, Upper Nile, West Bahr El Ghazal, Jonglei, and Unity.[7]

Cluster Munition Monitor 2012 reported two allegations of cluster munition use by the armed forces of Sudan in the first half of 2012 in Troji and Ongolo in Southern Kordofan, a state bordering South Sudan that has seen fighting between the Sudan People’s Liberation Army North (SPLM-N) and the Sudan Armed Forces since June 2011. A network of citizen journalists, Nuba Reports, reported that on 18 April 2013 at 10:20am two cluster bombs were dropped from aircraft on the village of Lado in Southern Kordofan. According to the report “some of the internal explosives in the cluster bombs did not explode” and were scattered in the village.[8] The Monitor has not been able to independently confirm this report.

In September 2011, South Sudan said that as a victim of the use of cluster munitions, “we call on all parties in the region to use their influence to ensure that cluster munitions not be used along with landmines by the parties who oppose our new state.”[9]

 



[1] Statement of South Sudan to the Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013. Notes by Action on Armed Violence.

[2] Statement of South Sudan, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/statement_south_sudan.pdf.

[3] In September 2011, a South Sudan representative informed the CMC that the government would address its accession to the Convention on Cluster Munitions after joining the Mine Ban Treaty. CMC meeting with South Sudan delegation to the Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011. Notes by the CMC.

[4] Statement of South Sudan, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/statement_south_sudan.pdf.

[5] CMC meeting with South Sudan delegation to the Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011. Notes by the CMC.

[6] Virgil Wiebe and Titus Peachey, “Clusters of Death: The Mennonite Central Committee Cluster Bomb Report,” Chapter 4, July 2000, clusterbombs.mcc.org/system/files/Clusters%20of%20Death_1.pdf. Landmine Action photographed a Rockeye-type cluster bomb with Chinese language external markings in Yei in October 2006. Additionally, clearance personnel in Sudan have identified a variety of submunitions, including the Spanish-manufactured HESPIN 21, United States-produced M42 and Mk-118 (Rockeye), and Soviet-manufactured PTAB-1.5. Handicap International, Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), p. 55, www.stopclustermunitions.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/circle-of-impact-may-07.pdf.

[7] UN Mine Action Service South Sudan, “Mine Action News,” June 2013.

[8] Nuba Reports, 22 April 2013, www.nubareports.org/breaking/04222013-1533.

[9] Statement of South Sudan, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011, www.clusterconvention.org/files/2011/09/statement_south_sudan.pdf.


Last Updated: 26 November 2013

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

On 9 July 2013, the Republic of South Sudan celebrated its second year as an independent country after decades of civil war that ended with a six-year Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). Throughout the long-running conflict, landmines were used by all parties to defend their positions and to disrupt the movement and operations of opposing forces. All 10 states of South Sudan are contaminated to varying degrees with mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW).

Vincent Lelei, Head of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in South Sudan, said in July 2013 that clearing mines and destroying ERW was a top priority for South Sudan.[1] The OCHA Mid-Year Review of its $1 billion appeal described South Sudan in June 2013 as a fragile situation with fewer population displacements, better food security, improved security, and a weak economy.[2] At the same time, the 28 accidents from landmines and ERW reported in the first quarter of 2013 were five times more than reported for the same period in 2012.[3]

In 2012, South Sudan saw an increase in landmine/ERW threat levels in the northern border states of Upper Nile, Unity, and Southern Kordofan as well as in the disputed area of Abyei.[4] In May 2013, access to the Pochalla and Pibor areas in Jonglei State has been extremely limited because of the security situation. The National Mine Action Authority (NMAA) went on a fact-finding mission during June/July 2013 to engage with civil authorities in the states of Jonglei, Upper Nile, Unity, and Western Bahr El Ghazal. NMAA met with the Governor and Deputy Governor, as well as the Sector and Division Commanders from the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). Both the civil authorities and the SPLA denied allegations they laid new mines. The SPLA, however, confirmed that new mines had indeed been laid by rebel forces in Unity state and in the areas of Khorflus and Khorwai in Jonglei state. The UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) has been unable to independently verify the allegations due to access restrictions to the alleged sites.[5]

Mine action operations face major challenges in South Sudan. The state of the infrastructure, inaccessibility of large areas during the wet season in July, August, and September, and sporadic nationwide outbreaks of violence require good planning and flexibility from mine action operators. In September 2012, South Sudan reported there were 707 suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) remaining covering 159km2.[6] UNMAS, in May 2013, reported there were approximately 660 known areas containing explosive threats.[7] However, as previously unknown hazards are continually being discovered, UNMAS expected the overall number of contaminated and cleared areas to increase.[8]

Mines

All 10 states of South Sudan are contaminated to varying degrees with landmines, with the states of Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, Jonglei, and Upper Nile the most affected. The full extent of contamination is not known, especially in states of Jonglei, Unity, and Upper Nile, because some communities remain inaccessible due to poor security conditions and communications as well as flooding, making surveys difficult to conduct.[9]

Contamination in South Sudan as of April 2013[10]

State

Total

Dangerous areas

Mined areas

SHAs*

Confrontation area

Previous ambush area

UXO** Spot tasks

Central Equatoria

359

6

163

93

41

5

51

East Equatoria

100

1

72

5

5

2

15

Jonglei

85

1

41

21

10

0

12

West Equatoria

62

1

37

12

5

0

7

Unity

19

0

5

2

1

1

10

Upper Nile

14

0

11

1

1

0

1

West Bahr El Ghazal

11

0

6

1

1

2

1

Lakes

9

0

5

1

1

1

1

North Bahr El Ghazal

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

Total

660

9

341

136

65

11

98

* A “suspected hazardous area (SHA)” has been defined by UNMAS South Sudan as an area “not in productive use due to the perceived or actual presence of mines or ERW”[11]

** UXO = unexploded ordinance

More than 30,000 antipersonnel and antivehicle mines have been found in South Sudan’s states since 2004 and over 800,000 ERW, reflecting both the longevity and intensity of the conflict with the North.

Mines Found in South Sudan: 2004–2012[12]

State

Antipersonnel Mines

Antivehicle Mines

ERW

Central Equatoria

14,792

2,030

459,939

Upper Nile

5,168

981

30,770

Jonglei

4,345

395

27,533

East Equatoria

1,276

288

173,806

West Bahr El-Ghazal

704

281

40,967

Lakes

559

419

38,468

West Equatoria

292

56

28,346

Warab

61

32

9,893

Unity

28

2

1,916

North Bahr El Ghazal

3

6

5,875

Total

27,228

4,490

817,513

Cluster munition remnants

Since 2006, 629 sites containing cluster munition remnants have been identified in all 10 states in South Sudan. By April 2013, UNMAS reported 58 known dangerous areas containing unexploded submunitions remained in seven states: Central Equatoria, East Equatoria, West Equatoria, Upper Nile, West Bahr El Ghazal, Jonglei, and Unity. Cluster munition remnants have been found in residential areas, farmland, pasture, rivers and streams, on hillsides, in desert areas, in and around former military barracks, on roads, in minefields, and in ammunition storage areas.[13]

Cluster munition-contaminated areas in South Sudan as of April 2013[14]

State

Open

Closed

Total

East Equatoria

10

308

318

Central Equatoria

35

159

194

West Equatoria

8

72

80

Lakes

0

12

12

Upper Nile

1

9

10

West Bahr El Ghazal

1

4

5

Warab

0

4

4

Jonglei

2

1

3

North Bahr El Ghazal

0

2

2

Unity

1

0

1

Total

58

571

629

Mine Action Program

Key institutions and operators

Body

Situation on 1 January 2013

National Mine Action Authority

National Mine Action Authority (NMAA)

Mine action center

NMAA and UNMAS South Sudan

International demining operators

Four NGOs: DanChurchAid (DCA), Danish Demining Group (DDG), Mines Advisory Group (MAG), and Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA)

Four commercial companies: G4S Ordnance Management (G4S OM), MECHEM, MineTech International (MTI), and The Development Initiative (TDI)

National demining operators

Sudan Integrated Mine Action Service (SIMAS)

The South Sudan Demining Authority (SSDA) was established in 2006 by presidential decree to act as the main governmental authority for the coordination, formulation, and supervision of the implementation of plans for removing mines from roads, paths, and other places where mines are suspected to be laid or buried.[15] It has been replaced by the NMAA.

UN Security Council  Resolution 1996 of 8 July 2011 stipulates that UNMAS has the responsibility to support the government of South Sudan in conducting demining activities while strengthening the capacity of the NMAA. UNMAS, with the NMAA, coordinates, facilitates, and oversees all mine action activities in South Sudan through its main office in Juba, and its sub-offices in Bentiu, Malakal, Wau, and Yei.[16] As of May 2013, UNMAS was responsible for tasking, accreditation, and database management. The NMAA takes the lead on victim assistance and risk education.[17]More generally, UN Security Council Resolution 1996 authorized the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) to support mine action through assessed peacekeeping funds.[18]

In 2011, fighting between Sudan and South Sudan over the disputed border area resulted in the complete destruction of the town of Abyei and surrounding villages, the displacement of over 100,000 people, and additional mine and UXO contamination.[19] In response, the UN Security Council authorized a UN Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA) “to monitor and verify the redeployment of any Sudan Armed Forces, Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) or its successor from the Abyei area” just prior to South Sudan formally declaring its independence from Sudan in July 2011. UNISFA was also mandated to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid and provide security to the oil industry’s infrastructure in coordination with the local police. The resolution, however, did not include a mandate for peacekeepers to conduct mine clearance operations as did the UN Mission in Sudan mandate that ended in July 2011.[20]In November 2012, UN Security Council Resolution 2075 expanded the UNMAS role to include identification and clearance of mines in the Safe Demilitarized Border Zone. UNMAS enables the work of the Joint Border Verification and Monitoring Mechanism (JBVMM) along the 2,100km international border between South Sudan and Sudan. It also provides training to UN and national observers while facilitating access on the ground by assessing and clearing priority areas and routes.[21]In May 2013, the UN Security Council increased the number of peacekeepers in Abyei and noted concern in the resolution that a residual landmine and ERW problem in Abyei hampered the return of displaced people.[22]

As of May 2013, UNMAS functioned as the coordination body for mine action operations, and the NMAA mirrored the UNMAS structure with operational and programmatic support in Juba. The NMAA also had sub-office locations in Yei, Wau, and Malakal. It is planned that eventually the NMAA will take over the UNMAS coordination role.[23]

Austerity measures imposed by the government of South Sudan in July 2012 have impacted NMAA’s ability to operate.[24] As of May 2013, they did not have funds for clearance, risk education, or victim assistance projects.[25]

Since 2010, NPA has been a key partner in building the capacity of SSNMAA. Originally asked by UNDP to provide training and support to the SSDA (now the NMAA), NPA has provided information technology equipment, training in information management, and other management training including for quality assurance. NPA has also provided training in explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) levels one and two as well as a manual demining training course.[26]

The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) provides support to the SSNMAA, UNMAS South Sudan, and other mine action actors in South Sudan in the field of strategic management, operations, and information management. The SSNMAA has a seat on the International Mine Action Standards Review Board.[27]

In February 2012, the SSNMAA (with assistance from UNMAS, Cranfield University, James Madison University, and the GICHD) developed the South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan for 2012–2016. The chairperson of the SSNMAA, Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch, said the government of the Republic of South Sudan was committed to assuming full responsibility for mine action activities, but the government did “not have the financial and technical capacity to support its mine action program. UN agencies, development partners, and international organizations will need to support the programme in providing technical and financial assistance.”[28] South Sudan has received approximately US$20 million in international assistance in both 2011 and 2012 as well as $37 million in assessed peacekeeping funds in order to assist the government of South Sudan to meet its Article 5 clearance deadline.[29]

Land Release

In July 2013, UNMAS reported that since 2004 over 2,000km2 of mine contaminated area had been released through survey and clearance in the states comprising South Sudan.[30]

Survey and clearance operations target highly impacted communities and are carried out by mine clearance teams from DDG, G4S OM, MAG, MTI, NPA, TDI, and the only local organization in South Sudan, SIMAS.[31] Since 2004, South Sudan has been able to clear 23.77km2 of mined area and 30.32km2 of battle area. During clearance operations, 25,904 antipersonnel mines and 4,312 antivehicle mines have been destroyed. The UN Mine Action Coordination Centre (UNMACC) has reported that 797,068 ERW have been destroyed during both mine and battle area clearance (BAC) since 2005.[32] UNMACC also reported that more than 1,000km2 have been released through General Mine Action Assessment since 2004.[33]

Summary of Land Release: 2004–2012[34]

Year

Mined area cleared (km2)

Battle area cleared (km2)

Area cancelled (km2)

Antipersonnel mines found

Antivehicle mines found

2012

4.19

2.85

0.28

1,304

94

2011

2.56

5.17

0.31

3,509

696

2010

3.54

3.42

14.25

6,896

666

2009

3.45

4.31

5.41

3,158

349

2008

3.13

5.45

0

7,596

248

2007

5.24

3.01

0

2,531

1,207

2006

1.16

5.44

0

1,585

470

2005

0.48

0.52

0

556

277

2004

0.02

0.15

0

73

399

Total

23.77

30.32

20.25

27,208

4,406

Mine clearance in 2012

In 2012, seven operators cleared a total of 4.19km2 of mined areas, destroying 936 antipersonnel mines, 116 antitank mines, and 1,295 UXO.

Mine clearance: 2012[35]

Demining Operators

Area Cleared (m2)

Antipersonnel mines

Antivehicle mines

UXO

MTI

1,811,636

304

92

115

G4S OM

1,223,173

346

2

157

NPA

858,374

60

10

7

MAG

126,699

90

10

988

SIMAS

107,560

133

0

4

TDI

69,891

3

2

4

DDG

0

0

0

20

Total

4,197,333

936

116

1,295

Road verification and clearance

Road verification and clearance to support UNMISS and the delivery of humanitarian assistance, particularly food aid from the World Food Program, as well as to facilitate the return of internally displaced people and refugees, has been a mine action priority since 2005 when the CPA was signed. UNMAS has prioritized clearance of major roads, some of which were still mined as of May 2013. There is less information available about the extent of the mine threat problem on the smaller roads at the county and payam (district) level. UNMAS planned to conduct further road surveys in 2013 after the rainy season.[36]

As of July 2013, over 3,000km of road had been verified and a further 20,000km assessed allowing South Sudan to open more than 20,000km of roads, including those connecting with Kenya and Uganda.[37] Route assessment and verification continued in 2013 as UNMAS identified routes in Eastern Equatoria state as a priority.[38]

Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty

In accordance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty, South Sudan is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 9 July 2021.

South Sudan expects to have surveyed and recorded all SHAs by the end of 2016 to facilitate the next strategic mine action planning phase.[39]

According to UNMAS, South Sudan faces major financial and security challenges in conducting clearance activities across South Sudan. It is too early to know if South Sudan can meet its 2021 deadline.

Battle area clearance in 2012

In 2012, eight operators conducted BAC and cleared 2.85km2. MTI cleared more battle area than the other seven operators combined.

Battle Area Clearance, by operator: 2012[40]

Operators

Area cleared (m2)

Antipersonnel mines

Antitank mines

UXO

MTI

1,545,800

12

2

90

TDI

488,918

68

8

4,992

NPA

487,924

236

21

4,251

MAG

276,353

24

3

6,898

G4S

47,870

0

0

4

SIMAS

4,479

1

6

573

DCA

625

26

4

53

DDG

0

1

0

2,407

Total

2,851,969

368

44

19,268

Quality management

Quality management (QM) in South Sudan includes the development and annual review of National Technical Standards and Guidelines (NTSG), annual accreditation of all clearance organizations, task site monitoring, external quality assurance (QA), and monitoring of organizations’ internal QM systems.[41]

SSMAA participates in QA of all tasks from start-up to completion in all 10 states in South Sudan. It is responsible for the development and review of the NTSG.[42]

Safety of demining personnel

There were no incidents during demining in 2012.[43]

 



[2]OCHA, “South Sudan Consolidated Appeal: Mid Year Review,” 27 June 2013, p. 3.

[3] Ibid., p. 38.

[4] UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS), “Annual Report 2012,” New York, September 2012, p. 22.

[5] Email from Lance Malin, Program Manager, UNMAS, 14 October 2013.

[6] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report (for the period 9 July 2011 to 1 September 2012), 3 December 2012.

[7] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, Chief of Operations, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[9] Republic of South Sudan, “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” Juba, February 2012, p. iii.

[10] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[11] Republic of South Sudan, “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” Juba, February 2012, pp. iv and 5.

[12] UNMAS, “IMSMA [Information Management System for Mine Action] Monthly Report – December 2012.”

[13] Republic of South Sudan, “National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” Juba, February 2012, pp. 4–6 and 9.

[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[15] Republic of South Sudan, “South Sudan De-Mining Authority,” undated.

[16] UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), “United Nations Mine Action Coordination Centre [UNMACC],” undated; Asa Massleberg, “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership–Sudan,” Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), Geneva, March 2012; and interview with Lance Malin, UNMACC, in Geneva, 22 March 2012.

[17] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[19] UNMAS, “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” New York, August 2013, p. 10.

[20] UNISFA, “UNISFA Mandate,” undated.

[21] UNMAS, “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” New York, August 2013, p. 10.

[22] UN Security Council Resolution 2104, S/RES/2104 (2013), 29 May 2013.

[23] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[24]South Sudan Parliament Passes Austerity Budget,” Voice of America, 19 July 2012.

[25] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[26] Asa Massleberg, “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership–Sudan,” GICHD, Geneva, March 2012; and NPA, “Mine Action in South Sudan,” 2011.

[27] GICHD, “GICHD Support to South Sudan,” 21 March 2013.

[28] Republic of South Sudan, South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016, Juba, February 2012, p. iii.

[29] UNMAS, “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” p. 39; and ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: South Sudan: Support for Mine Action,” November 2013.

[31] UNMAS, “IMSMA Monthly Report – April 2013.”

[32] UNMAS, “IMSMA Monthly Report – July 2012;” and response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[33] UNMAS, “IMSMA Monthly Report – July 2012.”

[34] Ibid.

[35] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[36] Ibid.

[38] Ibid.

[39] Republic of South Sudan, “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” Juba, February 2012, p. 17.

[40] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Robert Thompson, UNMAS, South Sudan, 24 May 2013.

[41] Ibid., 13 July 2012.

[42] Ibid.

[43] Ibid.


Last Updated: 25 November 2013

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Summary findings

·         The expansion of ICRC support for physical rehabilitation increased the availability of centers; but a decrease in trained personnel reduced production

·         The Republic of South Sudan made progress in integrating victim assistance and disability issues into 10 government ministries through the establishment of focal points

·         Victim assistance projects funded through the UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) and implemented by national and local organizations, including survivor associations, closed in June 2012; this significantly reduced economic inclusion opportunities for mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities

Victim assistance commitments

South Sudan is responsible for a significant number of landmine survivors, cluster munition victims, and survivors of other explosive remnants of war (ERW) who are in need. South Sudan has made commitments to provide victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty.

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2012

At least 4,813 mine/ERW casualties (1,349 killed; 3,464 injured)

Casualties in 2012

22 (2011: 206)

2012 casualties by outcome

9 killed; 13 injured (2011: 87 killed; 119 injured)

2012 casualties by device type

1 antipersonnel mine; 4 undefined mine; 7 ERW; 10 unknown

In 2012, the Monitor identified 22 mine/ERW casualties in South Sudan.[1] All casualties were civilians; boys made up the single largest casualty group (6 or 27%). Children constituted 63% of all casualties for which the age was known (10 of 16).[2] At least two casualties were women. There were no casualties among deminers in 2012. One deminer casualty was recorded in 2011. Casualties were recorded in four of South Sudan’s 10 states in 2012, down from eight states in 2011.

The 22 casualties identified in 2012 were a significant decrease compared with the 206 identified in 2011.[3] The decrease was attributed to the reduced movement of displaced populations from the north into South Sudan in 2012 as compared with 2011, when there was a great deal of people movement. In addition, it was believed that not all incidents were reported or identified due to the poor communications infrastructure and the movement of populations within the country.[4]

There were at least 4,813 casualties (1,349 killed; 3,464 injured) in South Sudan for the period from 1964 to December 2012.[5] Of the total for which the sex was recorded, 3,390 (or 83%) were male and 668 were female;[6] when the sex among the injured was known, 2,548 survivors were male and 476 were female. There were 609 child casualties.

Cluster munition casualties

In 2012, the UN Mine Action Coordination Centre–South Sudan (UNMACC) reported 65 casualties from cluster submunitions in South Sudan, all of which occurred in 2009 or before.[7] Another 16 casualties which occurred during cluster munition strikes in South Sudan have been reported.[8] No casualties from cluster munitions have been identified after 2009.

Victim Assistance

As of the end of 2012, 3,464 mine/ERW survivors were identified in South Sudan.[9] In 2011, the Ministry of Gender, Child and Social Welfare (MGCSW) estimated that there were a total of some 50,000 mine/ERW victims, including survivors, their families, and the families of people killed.[10]

Victim assistance since 1999[11]

As a result of decades of conflict, since 1999, mine/ERW survivors in South Sudan lacked access to basic services of all kinds. The limited services available were almost entirely provided by international organizations. Through to the end of 2012, emergency medical care was inadequate to address the needs of mine/ERW survivors and others wounded as a result of the armed conflict. Ongoing medical care reached just a fraction of the population.

There were some improvements in the availability of physical rehabilitation for mine/ERW during the period. In 1999, South Sudan had just one physical rehabilitation center, in the capital Juba. In 2003, Medical Care Development International (MCDI) began developing an additional rehabilitation center at the Rumbek Regional Hospital. By the end of 2010, MCDI had transferred full management of the center to the regional government. In 2008, the ICRC introduced a physical rehabilitation training program at the Juba rehabilitation center and by 2009 it had been upgraded to a Rehabilitation Referral Center.

From 1999, there were little to no economic inclusion initiatives for mine survivors, a situation that improved somewhat with increased international funding for victim assistance from 2007–2011. These programs were implemented by national organizations, including disabled persons’ organizations (DPOs), and coordinated by the South Sudan Demining Authority (SSDA) (later named the National Mine Action Authority, NMAA) with support from the United Nations Mine Action Office (UNMAO), and later the UNMACC, within the framework of the National Victim Assistance Strategic Framework 2007–2011. However, these programs were insufficient to address demand. Psychological support for mine/ERW survivors was entirely absent in South Sudan.

Victim assistance in 2012

As in previous years, a lack of transportation, insecurity, and poor road infrastructure proved the greatest obstacle to accessing all services for survivors. Services were very limited in comparison with the level of need and most were provided by international organizations. In June 2012, the government of South Sudan approved the South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016, which included victim assistance. The Victim Assistance Coordination Group changed its name to the Victim Assistance and Disability Working Group and steps were taken to integrate victim assistance and disability into the work of all relevant government ministries.

Assessing victim assistance needs

Several surveys of survivors and needs were undertaken in 2012. In 2012, the MGCSW carried out a pilot disability survey in the cities of Wau, Torit, and Bor with technical support from Handicap International (HI) and funding from UNMAS.[12] Data collected was used in developing a national disability policy and was shared with relevant government authorities at the national and state level and with members of the Victim Assistance and Disability Working Group (VADWG).[13] The survey found that 53% of respondents had a physical impairment, 20% a visual impairment, 12% a hearing impairment, and 8.3% of respondents were identified as having mental illness.[14]

Also in 2012, the National Mine Action Authority (NMAA) assessed the needs of 238 mine/ERW survivors in Juba and found that 72% lacked prosthetics or mobility devices and adequate housing.[15]

Between December 2011 and June 2012, South Sudan Disabled Persons Association (SSDPA), with support from UNMAS, surveyed mine/ERW victims in Bentiu, Unity state and collected data on 1,466 victims who had not been registered prior to the survey.[16]

Previously, needs assessments had been carried out in other areas of the country by the NMAA and the MGCSW, with support from the UNMACC and by the SSDPA. Data collected in Juba and in Upper Nile state in October and November 2010 were included in the national casualty database, maintained by the UNMACC.[17] The SSDA needs assessment in Juba collected data on 238 survivors. The SSDPA collected data on 1,188 survivors in Upper Nile state.[18]

Victim assistance coordination[19]

Government coordinating body/focal point

MGCSW with support from NMAA

Coordinating mechanism

VADWG chaired by MGCSW and supported by NMAA

Plan

South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016

In 2012, the name of the victim assistance coordination mechanism was changed from the Victim Assistance Working Group to the Victim Assistance and Disability Working Group in order to underscore that victim assistance included persons with disabilities and that there was no discrimination among persons with disabilities based on the cause.[20]

The VADWG continued to hold monthly meetings, chaired by the MGCSW and supported by the NMAA.[21] Participants included government ministries, DPOs, NGO service providers, and other stakeholders. Meetings were used to develop the victim assistance component of the Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016, share information about activities implemented, and track progress in the implementation of the plan in the second half of the year. The VADWG also appointed focal points within government ministries and commissions to mainstream victim assistance and disability issues throughout government structures. By early 2013, 10 focal points had been appointed.[22]

In June 2012, the Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016 was endorsed by the Office of the President.[23] It was developed through consultations with all members of the VADWG. The plan includes the following three victim assistance objectives:

·         Establish an information system for persons with disabilities to provide reliable, systematic and comprehensive information on persons with disabilities, including landmine and ERW victims, that is shared with relevant national authorities during regular coordination meetings with VA and rehabilitation partners;

·         Accede to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by the end of 2013[24] and adopt the necessary national laws to protect the rights of landmine/ERW survivors and persons with disabilities;

·         Ensure equal access to rehabilitation, psychosocial (including peer support) and socio-economic inclusion services for all landmine and ERW victims, as well as women, girls, boys, and men with disabilities.[25]

The plan states the relevant partners and budget needed per objective and includes a monitoring and evaluation plan with indicators for each objective against which to measure progress. Sources of funding are not indicated.[26]

A national disability policy, started in 2011, was still under development by the MGCSW as of early 2013.[27]

South Sudan provided updates on progress and challenges for victim assistance at the Twelfth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in December 2012 and through the voluntary submission of a Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for the period from July 2011–September 2012.[28] South Sudan did not make a statement at the Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration in May 2013.

Inclusion and participation in victim assistance

Mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities and their representative organizations were included in the VADWG and in the process to develop the national mine action strategy and the national disability policy.[29] Representative organizations were consulted in the preparation of South Sudan’s Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report. No survivors have been included in a delegation of South Sudan to an international meeting but plans were in place to strengthen the capacity of survivor associations so that they might be in a position to participate effectively in the future.[30]

Survivor associations and DPOs were involved in assessing the needs of survivors and other persons with disabilities, as well as in income-generating activities, peer support, and in providing basic health services.[31]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities[32]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2012

MGCSW

Government

Capacity building for survivor associations and DPOs

Ongoing

NMAA

Government

Support for the establishment of the national Landmine Victim Association (LMVA)

Association established in early 2012

Ministry of Social Development of Central Equatoria and Lakes States

Government

Physical rehabilitation through the Rumbek Center and the Nile Assistance for the Disabled Center in Juba

Ongoing

Central Equatorial State Government

Government

Physical rehabilitation and psychosocial counseling through the Juba Rehabilitation Center (national referral center)

Ongoing

Sudanese Disabled Rehabilitation and Development Agency (SDRDA)

National NGO

Income-generating activities and skills trainings in Rumbek, Lakes state

Project completed

SSDPA

National NGO

Needs assessment/data collection; income-generating and skills training in Upper Nile state

Project completed by June

Christian Women’s Empowerment Program

National NGO

Vocational training and income-generating activities in Yei county, Central Equatoria state

Project completed by June

Sudan Evangelical Mission (SEM)

National NGO

Economic empowerment of persons with disabilities through training in business skills, distribution of some mobility aids; in Wau, Northern Bahr el Ghazal state

Project completed by June

Equatoria State Association of Disabled (ESAD)

National NGO

Skills trainings and income-generating activities in Juba, Central Equatoria state; peer support for members

Ongoing

HI

International NGO

Basic rehabilitation services; training for health professionals in rehabilitation; needs assessment; referrals for victim assistance services; micro-grants to disabled persons’ organizations; awareness raising and advocacy on disability rights

Ongoing

Organization of Volunteers for International Cooperation (OVCI)

International NGO

Community based rehabilitation in Kator district, Juba, occupational therapy

Ongoing

ICRC

International organization

Emergency first-aid to conflict casualties and capacity-building for health centers’ emergency response; support for national Rehabilitation Reference Center and Rumbek Rehabilitation Center; Physical Rehabilitation Unit in Wau

Expanded geographic coverage; established one week per month rehabilitation unit in Wau, northwestern South Sudan; began supporting Rumbek Rehabilitation Center

As in previous years, a lack of transportation, insecurity, and poor road infrastructure proved the greatest obstacles to accessing all services for survivors.[33] Several international organizations working with mine/ERW survivors assisted survivors in overcoming accessibility obstacles alongside other program activities.[34] Nearly all victim assistance projects supported through UNMAS were closed by the end of June 2012.[35]

Emergency and continuing medical care

In 2012, hospitals throughout the country and particularly in Unity state “struggled to cope” with the influx of wounded patients, most of whom had weapon-related injuries.[36] During the year, the ICRC worked to improve emergency care through training in first-aid and war surgery skills, distributing needed materials, and expanding the coverage of its emergency response.[37] Throughout 2012, the majority of South Sudan’s population continued to lack access to any form of healthcare and only one in four people had access to medical facilities, including those wounded by landmines/ERW and other conflict-related causes.[38]

Physical Rehabilitation including prosthetics

Increased support from the ICRC and the MGCSW for physical rehabilitation increased the availability of these services. In addition to continuing support to the national Rehabilitation Reference Center in Juba, the ICRC began providing materials and supplies to the government-run center in Rumbek. The ICRC also established a rehabilitation unit in Wau, in northwestern South Sudan, staffed by ICRC rehabilitation specialists, which operated one week of every month. However, the number of mine survivors receiving prosthetic services through ICRC-supported centers declined by almost 40% between 2011 and 2012.[39]

The MGCSW worked with the Italian NGO OCVI to increase services to children with disabilities, including landmine survivors, through the USURATUNA Center in Juba. However, these gains were somewhat offset by the loss of trained rehabilitation professionals who left their jobs, leaving the centers understaffed and causing declines in the production of prosthetics and mobility devices.[40]

Economic Inclusion

During the first half of 2012, several local NGOs (including survivor associations and DPOs) implemented economic inclusion projects targeting survivors that were focused on vocational training and income-generating activities and were coordinated through UNMAS.[41] UNMAS estimated that some 50% of the beneficiaries of victim assistance programs were persons with disabilities due to causes other than landmines and ERW.[42] By June 2012, all of these projects were closed because the funding available through UNMAS ended, significantly reducing economic inclusion opportunities for mine/ERW survivors.[43]

The South Sudan National Commission for War Disabled, Widows and Orphans slightly increased its capacity to provide training and income-generating support to those disabled due to the conflict.[44] However, this was insufficient compared to the needs of mine/ERW survivors.

Psychological support and social inclusion

Psychological support facilities were very limited in 2012.[45] In early 2012, HI introduced a new psychological support component to its victim assistance activities.[46] Some survivor associations and DPOs offered peer support to their members.[47]

The MGCSW worked to establish community-based rehabilitation with support from international organizations.[48]

A new school for children with disabilities was opened in 2012, but South Sudan lacked teachers trained to teach children with disabilities or to teach in an inclusive educational setting.[49]

Laws and Policies

South Sudan lacked laws and policies to protect the rights of persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors.[50] Access to targeted victim-assistance programs coordinated through UNMAS was equal for all persons with disabilities regardless of the cause, including mine/ERW survivors and men and women had equal access to assistance.[51] There were special programs for disabled veterans, such as the Wounded Heroes program, and for others disabled by war, including programs through the National Commission for War Disabled, though a lack of government resources meant that all victims faced similar challenges in having their needs met.[52]

As of 2012, the government had made no efforts to make buildings accessible to persons with disabilities.[53] Joining the CRPD was a priority for members of the VADWG and was included as one of the three main objectives within the National Mine Action Strategy.[54]

As of 1 June 2013, South Sudan had not signed the CRPD.

 



[1] This casualty figure does not include those casualties that occurred in Sudan. South Sudan became an independent state on 9 July 2011 but was previously part of Sudan. For more information on casualties and victim assistance in Sudan, please see ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Sudan: Casualties and Victim Assistance,” www.the-monitor.org. All casualty details, unless otherwise specified, provided by email from Mohammad Kabir, Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) Officer, UNMAS South Sudan, 18 April 2013; and from media monitoring from 1 January to 31 December 2012.

[2] The age of six casualties was unknown.

[3] Casualties for 2011 provided by email from Mohammad Kabir, IMSMA Officer, UN Mine Action Coordination Centre (UNMACC), 22 June 2012; and from media monitoring from 1 January to 31 December 2011.

[4] Email from Mohammad Kabir, UNMAS South Sudan, 14 May 2013.

[5] Ibid., 22 June 2012 and 18 April 2013; and media monitoring from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012.

[6] The sex was not specified for 747 casualties.

[7] Email from Mohammad Kabir, UNMACC, 22 June 2012.

[8] Handicap International (HI), Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), p. 56; and Titus Peachey and Virgil Wiebe, “Chapter IV: Cluster Munition Use in Sudan,” Clusters of Death (The Mennonite Central Committee: July 2000), pp. 79–85. The casualties during cluster munition strikes were reported in locations including Akak, Bahr el Ghazal; Nimule, Magwi County, and Yei County in South Sudan in the period 1995–2000.

[9] Emails from Mohammad Kabir, UNMAS, 22 June 2012 and 18 April 2013; and media monitoring from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012.

[10] MGCSW, “Victim Assistance Report Southern Sudan for the year 2010 and 2011. Southern Sudan Presentation, On States Party Meeting As From 20 To 24th June, 2011,” provided by Nathan Wojia Pitia Mono, Director General, MGCSW, in Geneva, 24 June 2011.

[11] See previous Sudan and South Sudan country profiles at the Monitor, www.the-monitor.org.

[12] Email from Celine Lefebvre, Program Director, HI South Sudan, 23 July 2012.

[13] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, Victim Assistance Focal Point and Director General, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Arek John Akot Kon, Victim Assistance and Mine Risk Education Assistant Coordinator, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Ibid.

[17] UNMAO, “Sudan Mine Action Sector, Multi Year Plan 2010–2014,” February 2011, p. 48.

[18] Statement of Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Tenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 1 December 2010; and email from Tim Horner, UNMAO, 25 July 2011.

[19] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[20] Ibid.

[21] Ibid.; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[22] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[23] Letter from Emmanuel LoWilla, Minister, Office of the President, 21 June 2012.

[24] Originally a goal that was aimed to be achieved by the end of 2012, South Sudan adjusted the timeframe of this objective to the end of 2013. Statement of South Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, 4 December 2013.

[25] “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” June 2012, p. vii.

[26] “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” June 2012.

[27] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[28] Statement of South Sudan, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, 4 December 2013; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report, 9 July 2011–1 September 2012, Form J.

[29] Responses to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013; and by Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[30] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[31] Ibid.

[32] South Sudan’s Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report includes a table of 33 organizations providing services to mine victims and other persons with disabilities. Only those for whom details were available about their activities have been included here. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report, 9 July 2011–1 September 2012, Annex V; OCVI, “South Sudan - rehabilitation center Usratuna,” ovci.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=65&Itemid=119; responses to Monitor questionnaire by Lucile Papon, Desk Office East Africa,  HI, 13 June 2013; and by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013; UNMAS, “VA projects comprehensive report 2007–2012,” received by email from Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013; ICRC Physical Rehabilitation Programme (PRP), “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, p. 40; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, pp. 172–174.

[33] ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, p. 40; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[34] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Celine Lefebvre, HI, 9 July 2012.

[35] Email from Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 October 2013.

[36] ICRC, “South Sudan: thousands displaced as fighting escalates,” 16 May 2012, www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/update/2012/south-sudan-update-2012-05-16.htm.

[37] ICRC, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, p. 173.

[38] “South Sudan: Getting healthcare to hard-to-reach areas,” IrinNews, 28 November 2012, www.irinnews.org/Report/96914/SOUTH-SUDAN-Getting-healthcare-to-hard-to-reach-areas; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, p. 172.

[39] Ninety-one survivors received prosthetics in 2011. The number was 55 in 2012. ICRC PRP, “Annual Report 2012,” Geneva, May 2013, p. 40.

[40] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[41] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[42] UNMAS, “VA projects comprehensive report 2007–2012,” received by email from Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[43] Email from Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 October 2013.

[44] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013; and Government of South Sudan, South Sudan National Commission for War Disabled, Widows and Orphans,” undated, www.goss-online.org/magnoliaPublic/en/Independant-Commissions-and-Chambers/War-Disabled--Widows-and-Orphans-Commission.html, accessed 27 September 2013.

[45] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report (for the period 9 July 2011 to 1 September 2012), Form J.

[46] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Celine Lefebvre, HI, 9 July 2012.

[47] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, 10 May 2013.

[48] Ibid.

[49] Ibid.

[50] Ibid.

[51] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Arek John Akot Kon, UNMAS, 2 May 2013.

[52] Lesley Anne Warner, “Force Reduction Key to South Sudan's Military Transformation,” World Politics Review, 5 November 2012, www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/12473/force-reduction-key-to-south-sudans-military-transformation; and “Jonglei joins South Sudan in commemoration of martyrs day,” Sudan Tribune, 1 August 2013, www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article47484.

[53] United States Department of State, “2012 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: South Sudan,” Washington, DC, 17 April 2013.

[54] Interview with Nathan Pitia, MGCSW, in Geneva, 24 June 2011; “South Sudan National Mine Action Strategic Plan 2012–2016,” June 2012.


Last Updated: 22 November 2013

Support for Mine Action

After decades of civil war that ended with a six-year Comprehensive Peace Agreement, the Republic of South Sudan became a state on 9 July 2011.

In 2012, 10 donors contributed US$18.9 million for clearance and victim assistance.[1]

As part of Canada’s C$1,268,693 (US$1,269,328) it provided C$40,000 (US$40,020) to the Hunger Foundation while Finland provided €100,000 ($128,590) to the ICRC for victim assistance.[2]

The UN General Assembly appropriates annual mine action budgets for the UN Mission in Sudan (UNMISS) operating in South Sudan. In 2012, the assessed budget for UNMISS in South Sudan was $37.3 million.[3]

Combined with $18.9 million from international assistance, and $37.3 million from the peacekeeping assessed budget, the total budget in 2012 was $56.2 million, one of the largest in the world.

International contributions: 2012[4]

Donor

Sector

Amount (national currency)

Amount ($)

Japan

Clearance

¥399,100,000

5,000,000

United States

Clearance

$2,800,000

2,800,000

European Union

Clearance

€2,097,000

2,696,532

Norway

Clearance

NOK15,000,000

2,578,161

Netherlands

Clearance

€1,223,760

1,573,633

Canada

Clearance, victim assistance

C$1,268,693

1,269,328

Denmark

Clearance

DKK6,605,000

1,140,327

Sweden

Clearance

SEK7,440,000

1,098,625

Germany

Clearance

€500,000

642,950

Finland

Victim assistance

€100,000

128,590

Total

 

 

18,928,146

Summary of contributions: 2011–2012[5]

Year

International contributions ($)

UNMISS assessed budget

($)

Total contributions ($)

2012

18,928,146

37,300,000

56,228,146

2011

22,946,144

16,900,000

39,846,144

Total

41,874,290

54,200,000

96,074,290

 

 



[1] Canada, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2013; email from Carolin J. Thielking, European Union Mine Action Focal Point, Division for WMD, Conventional Weapons and Space, European External Action Service, European Commission (EC), 15 May 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire from Adam Ravnkilde, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 17 May 2013; Germany, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), Amended Protocol II, Form B, 22 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire from Helena Vuokko, Desk Officer, Unit for Humanitarian Assistance, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, 2 April 2013; Japan, CCW, Amended Protocol II, 28 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire from Fabienne Moust, Policy Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands, 19 March 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 April 2013; Sweden, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 27 March 2013; and United States (US) Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2013,” Washington, DC, August 2013, p. 14.

[2] Canada, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2013; and response to Monitor questionnaire from Helena Vuokko, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, 2 April 2013. Average exchange rate for 2012: €1=US$1.2859; C$0.9995=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.

[3] UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS), “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” p. 22.

[4] Average exchange rate for 2012: DKK5.7922=US$1; €1=US$1.2859; ¥79.82=US$1; NOK5.8181=US$1; SEK6.7721=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.

 

[5] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Christine Pahlman, Mine Action Coordinator, AusAID, 24 April 2012; Canada, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire from Katrine Joensen, Head of Section, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark, 1 May 2012; email from Carolin J. Thielking, EC, 15 April 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Lt.-Col. Klaus Koppetsch, Desk Officer Mine Action, German Federal Foreign Office, 20 April 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire from Douwe Buzeman, Policy Officer Security and Development, Peace Building and Stabilisation Unit, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands, 16 April 2012; email from Eugen Secareanu, Resource Mobilisation Unit, UNMAS, 30 May 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Claudia Moser, Section for Multilateral Peace Policy, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, 19 June 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire from Maria Linderyd Linder, Deputy Director, Head of Section, Department for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sweden, 24 April 2012; response to Monitor questionnaire by Hannah Binci, Security and Justice Team, Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department, Department for International Development (DfID), 9 May 2012; US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety 2012,” Washington, DC, July 2012; “UNMAS Annual Report 2011,” p. 35; and “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” p. 22.