Germany
Mine Ban Policy
The Federal Republic of Germany signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 23 July 1998, becoming a State Party on 1 March 1999. Germany produced, imported, and exported mines. Production was renounced in April 1996, and a 1994 export moratorium was made permanent in 1996. Legislation to enforce the antipersonnel mine prohibition domestically entered into force on 9 July 1998. In April 2012, Germany submitted its 14th Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report.
Germany destroyed its stockpile of 1.7 million antipersonnel mines in December 1997. Germany initially retained 3,000 mines for training and development purposes, which was reduced to 2,130 mines by the end of 2011.[1] On 3 March 2011, 22,716 antipersonnel mines were transferred from Turkey to a company in Germany in order to be destroyed.[2]
In 2011 and 2012, Germany served as co-chair of the Standing Committee on stockpile destruction. Germany served as co-rapporteur of the Standing Committee on Technologies for Mine Action (1999–2000) and as co-rapporteur and then co-chair of the Standing Committees on Mine Clearance (2000–2002) and General Status and Operation of the Convention (2006–2008).
Germany attended the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, in November–December 2011 and the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva in May 2012. At both meetings, Germany made a number of statements including on stockpile destruction and retention, the treaty’s implementation support unit, cooperation and assistance, and on its progress to clear unexploded ordnance, including antipersonnel mines, from a former military training base at Wittstock.
Germany is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war.
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Convention on Cluster Munitions status |
State Party |
National implementation legislation |
War Weapons Control Act, 1961 (amended June 2009) |
Stockpile destruction |
By the end of 2013, 93% of the stockpile had been destroyed, working toward complete destruction by 2015 |
Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings |
Attended Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013 and intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2014 |
Key developments |
Provided an updated transparency report in April 2014 detailing a reduction in the number of cluster munitions retained for training and research purposes |
Policy
The Federal Republic of Germany signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008 and ratified on 8 July 2009. It was among the first 30 ratifications that triggered the convention’s entry into force on 1 August 2010.
Germany’s War Weapons Control Act was amended in June 2009 to provide for national implementation of the convention’s prohibitions and includes penal sanctions for violations of up to five years imprisonment.[1]
Germany submitted its initial Article 7 transparency report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 27 January 2011 and provided annual updated reports in 2012, 2013, and on 30 April 2014.[2]
Germany participated throughout the Oslo Process that produced the Convention on Cluster Munitions and its position evolved significantly to support an immediate and comprehensive prohibition on cluster munitions.[3]
Since the adoption of the convention in Dublin in May 2008, Germany has played a leading role in advancing the work of the convention. It hosted an international conference on the destruction of cluster munitions in Berlin in June 2009 and served as co-coordinator on stockpile destruction and retention in 2011–2012.
Germany has participated in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention, including the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013, where it made several statements, including on stockpile destruction and international cooperation and assistance.[4] Germany has attended all of the convention’s intersessional meetings in Geneva, including in April 2014.
In 2014, Germany provided financial support for the organization of a workshop on implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions for governments from Southeast Europe held by the Regional Arms Control Verification and Implementation Assistance Centre (RACVIAC) Centre for Security Cooperation as part of a symposium on mine action in Zadar, Croatia from 22–26 April 2014.[5]
Germany has continued to promote universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. At the Fourth Meeting of States Parties, it called on all states that have not yet done so to join the convention without delay.[6] In July 2014, the German Federal Foreign Office informed the Monitor that the Foreign Office remains committed to promoting the convention’s standards and continues to raise the matter of accession to the convention in ongoing bilateral consultations with states not party.[7]
Germany has condemned the Syrian government’s use of cluster munitions on several occasions since October 2012, including at the ministerial level.[8] At the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in September 2013, Germany stated that “unfortunately these hazardous weapons – stigmatized in public opinion – are still being used as well against civilians in many parts of the world. We are deeply concerned about reports that cluster munitions have been used in the conflict in Syria.”[9]
Germany has voted in favor of recent UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions condemning Syria’s cluster munition use, including Resolution 68/182 on 18 December 2013, which expressed “outrage” at “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights…including those involving the use of…cluster munitions.”[10]
Germany is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Interpretive issues
In 2012 and 2013, Germany expressed its views on a number of important issues related to interpretation and implementation of the convention, including the prohibition on assistance during joint military operations with states not party that may use cluster munitions, the prohibition on transit, the prohibition on investment in cluster munitions production, and the retention of cluster munitions for training and research purposes.
During the negotiations of the convention, Germany advocated strongly for provisions on “interoperability” (joint military operations with states not party). In June 2012, the German Federal Foreign Office reaffirmed to the Monitor that prior to the convention’s entry into force “clear orders” were issued for the German Armed Forces that “forbade German soldiers from using cluster munitions themselves, and from requesting or ordering the use of cluster munitions.” The instructions also “further prohibited the transport of cluster munitions using Bundeswehr [Federal Armed Forces] vehicles and/or personnel. Ordering or assisting such transport was also banned.”[11]
Germany’s implementation legislation prohibits the transit of cluster munitions.[12]
Germany has yet to express clear views on the prohibition on foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions, but United States (US) diplomatic cables made public by Wikileaks in 2011 show that Germany has engaged with the US on the matter of cluster munitions stored by the US in Germany.[13]
Germany’s implementation legislation, the War Weapons Control Act, does not explicitly prohibit investment in cluster munition production. In June 2013, the Federal Foreign Office reaffirmed its position, previously expressed to the Monitor, that “the Federal Government expects the German private sector including financial institutions to implement their voluntary commitments aimed at disinvesting in business segments related to CM [cluster munitions]. It is following the relevant developments closely.”[14]
In 2011 and 2012, motions submitted to and rejected by the German parliament called for Germany’s national implementation legislation, the War Weapons Control Act (Kriegswaffenkontrollgesetz) of 2009, to be amended to include a comprehensive ban on direct and indirect investment in cluster munition producers.[15]
Facing Finance and other German NGOs have campaigned for a comprehensive ban on financing in cluster munition production. A 2013 updated report on worldwide investment in cluster munitions by NGOs IKV Pax Christi (now PAX) and FairFin lists German financial institutions investments in cluster munition producers.[16]
Use, production, and transfer
According to the Federal Foreign Office, Germany has never used cluster munitions.[17] Germany unilaterally renounced the use of all types of cluster munitions on 29 May 2008, one day before it agreed to adopt the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Dublin.[18]
In the past, German industry was very active in the production and export of cluster munitions. According to the Federal Foreign Office, Germany stopped production and transfer of cluster munitions in 2005.[19]
In its initial Article 7 report, Germany declared that “all former production capabilities were dismantled prior to 2008.”[20] The last known export was in 2004–2005 when Germany sent a quantity of M26 rockets with submunitions to Slovakia.[21]
The company Diehl GmbH and numerous subcontractors were involved in the production of M26 rockets for the 227mm multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) as part of the MLRS European Producers Group.[22] Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH produced the MW-1 dispenser (that deploys submunitions) for aircraft.[23]
The company Rheinmetall produced several types of 155mm artillery projectiles containing dual purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) submunitions.[24] These were produced for the German Armed Forces as well as for export customers including Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Italy (co-production), and Norway.[25]
Germany also imported cluster munitions from the United Kingdom (UK) and the US.
A consortium of Diehl, Gesellschaft für Intelligente Wirksysteme GmbH (GIWS), and Rheinmetall produce the SMArt-155 artillery projectile, a weapon that employs two submunitions but is not considered a cluster munition under the Convention on Cluster Munitions because it meets the five technical criteria set out by negotiators as necessary to avoid the negative effects of cluster munitions.[26] This has been produced for the German Armed Forces and for export customers Australia, Greece, Switzerland, and the UK.[27] The consortium granted licensed co-production rights to Alliant Techsystems in the US for the SMArt-155, and Alliant has marketed the munitions in the United Arab Emirates. According to the NGO Actiongroup Landmine.de (now Facing Finance), more than 25,000 SMArt-155 projectiles have been produced.[28] Facing Finance has estimated that between 2000 and 2003, Germany acquired 9,000 SMArt-155 howitzer projectiles.[29] As of July 2014, Diehl’s website advertised the production and sale of SMArt-155 artillery projectiles, but it stated that “being point-target ammunition, SMArt® 155 is not part of the Oslo Convention.”[30]
Stockpiling and destruction
Germany once possessed a total 553,549 cluster munitions containing 62,958,626 submunitions, including weapons destroyed prior to entry into force of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. As of 31 December 2013, Germany had destroyed 513,770 cluster munitions and 62,748,768 submunitions. Its remaining stockpile awaiting destruction consisted of 49,228 cluster munitions and 10,148,170 submunitions.[31]
Stockpile cluster munitions destroyed by Germany (as of 31 December 2013)[32]
Type of cluster munition |
Quantity destroyed |
|
||||
Pre-1 August 2010 |
Post-1 August 2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Total destroyed |
|
M483A1 projectile, each containing 88 M42/M46 submunitions |
43,853 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43,853 |
DM602 projectile, each containing 63 DM1348 submunitions |
109,319 |
7,024 |
0 |
0 |
423 |
116,766 |
DM612 projectile, each containing 63 DM1348 submunitions |
69,908 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
69,908 |
DM632 projectile, each containing 63 DM1385 submunitions |
50 |
0 |
11,410 |
15,045 |
58,509 |
85,014 |
DM642 projectile, each containing 63 DM1383 submunitions |
4,944 |
12,587 |
0 |
33,217 |
831 |
51,579 |
DM642A1 projectile, each containing 63 DM1383 submunitions |
0 |
4,421 |
42,435 |
23,655 |
16 |
70,527 |
DM652 projectile, each containing 49 DM1383 submunitions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8,605 |
8,605 |
DM602 projectile (203mm), each containing 120 DM1385A1 submunitions |
39,576 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39,576 |
BL755 bomb, each containing 147 Mk1 submunitions |
13,341 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
13,354 |
CBU-2CA bomb, each containing 409 BLU-3/B submunitions |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
Dispenser MW-1 DM11, each containing 668 MUSA submunitions |
76 |
65 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
147 |
Dispenser MW-1 DM12, each containing 4,536 KB44 submunitions |
96 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
98 |
Dispenser MW-1 DM22, each containing 200 STABO submunitions |
71 |
0 |
106 |
0 |
0 |
177 |
Dispenser MW-1 DM31, each containing 692 MUSA, MUSPA or MIFF submunitions |
142 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
172 |
Dispenser MW-1 DM32, each containing 2,632 K44 or MIFF submunitions |
249 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
250 |
M26 Rocket, each containing 644 M77 submunitions |
798 |
3798 |
7056 |
1,141 |
950 |
13,743 |
Total |
282,437 |
27,896 |
61,045 |
73,058 |
69,334 |
513,770 |
Stockpile destruction
Under Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Germany is required to destroy all stockpiled cluster munitions under its jurisdiction and control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 August 2018.
Germany has often expressed its intent to complete stockpile destruction by the end of 2015.[33] In September 2013, Germany informed States Parties that it is on track to complete the destruction of its remaining stockpiles of cluster munitions in 2015.[34]
In April 2014, Germany reported that 93% of its stockpile had been destroyed by the end of 2013.[35] In 2013 alone, a total of 69,334 cluster munitions and 7,858,532 submunitions were destroyed.[36] As of 31 December 2013, a total of 39,108 cluster munitions of four different types and just over 10 million submunitions remained to be destroyed, as shown by the following table.
Stockpile to be destroyed by Germany (as of 31 December 2013)[37]
Type |
Quantity of cluster munitions |
Quantity of submunitions |
DM602 projectile, each containing 63 DM1348 submunitions |
0 |
0 |
DM632 projectile, each containing 63 DM1385 submunitions |
36,297 |
2,286,711 |
DM642 projectile, each containing 63 DM1383 submunitions |
0 |
0 |
DM642A1 projectile, each containing 63 DM1383 submunitions |
0 |
0 |
DM652 projectile, each containing 49 DM1383 submunitions |
781 |
38,269 |
CBU-2CA bomb, each containing 409 BLU-3/B submunitions |
6 |
2,454 |
M26 Rocket, each containing 644 M77 submunitions |
12,144 |
7,820,736 |
Total |
49,228 |
10,148,170 |
Germany started destroying its BL755 cluster bombs in 2001 following reliability concerns. Destruction of DM612 155mm artillery projectiles began in 2007, and destruction of other types of cluster munitions followed in 2009.[38]
The destruction of Germany’s cluster munitions stockpile has been conducted at three locations in Germany: Nammo Buck in Pinnow, Spreewerk Lübben in Lübben, and Muniberka in Dietersdorf. The Article 7 reports describe the safety and environmental standards observed.[39]
In September 2013, Germany said that the destruction of its DM 632 projectiles would be completed by the end of 2014 and remaining stockpiles would be destroyed by the end of 2015. It said that “several technical obstacles had to be overcome in the development of destruction processes for some types of munitions. The completion of destruction for certain 155mm munitions, which was planned for the end of 2012, has had to be rescheduled to the end of this year.”[40]
In April 2013, Germany reported that it spent a total of €11.8 million on stockpile destruction prior to the entry into force of the convention and a further €29.6 million was allocated from 1 August 2010 to 2016, making a total of €41.4 million (US$53.2 million).[41]
Retention
In its April 2014 Article 7 report, Germany declared retaining a total of 657 cluster munitions and 59,555 submunitions for explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) training and research purposes.[42]
Cluster munitions and explosive submunitions retained in accordance with Article 3(6)[43]
Cluster munitions type |
Quantity (as of 31 December 2012) |
Quantity (as of 31 December 2013) |
Explosive submunition type |
Quantity (as of 31 December 2012) |
Quantity (as of 31 December 2011) |
DM 602 |
235 |
235 |
DM1348 |
14,805 |
14,805 |
DM 632 |
0 |
|
DM1385 |
0 |
0 |
DM642/DM642A1 |
243 |
223 |
DM1383 |
15,309 |
14,049 |
DM602 |
207 |
199 |
DM1385A1 |
24,840 |
23,880 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
MUSA |
750 |
750 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
KB44 |
3,822 |
3,045 |
|
– |
– |
STABO |
450 |
550 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
MIFF |
1,000 |
1,000 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
MUSPA |
750 |
750 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
BLU-3/B |
854 |
726 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
DM1383 |
0 |
0 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
DPICM |
0 |
0 |
Submunition only |
– |
– |
Mk1 |
0 |
0 |
Total |
685 |
657 |
|
62,580 |
59,555 |
During 2013, Germany consumed a total of 28 cluster munitions and 3,125 submunitions during EOD training.[44] In 2012, Germany consumed a total of 58 cluster munitions and 6,330 submunitions during EOD training.[45] In 2011, a total of 39 cluster munitions and 2,862 submunitions were consumed.[46]
Germany has retained the largest number of submunitions of any State Party. The CMC has expressed concern at the retention of such high numbers of cluster munitions and submunitions and asked if Germany’s training program is large enough to require the consumption of so many submunitions.
In 2014, Germany declared that “a review on consumption of retained [cluster munitions] with the aim of reduction is ongoing.”[47] In September 2013, it informed States Parties that “the calculations and plans for retention of selected items are kept under constant review, thus upholding the spirit of this convention without neglecting our responsibility for the safety and security of our men and women in current and future operations. Thus, we can ensure that we retain only the very minimum quantity of cluster munitions necessary for permitted development and training.”[48]
Previously, in September 2012 Germany informed States Parties that it planned to intensify EOD training in light of the increasing dangers faced by German Armed Forces from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and, as a result, said there would be “an estimated increase in consumption of individual submunitions of approximately 30% from 2013 onwards.” In addition, “Some types of submunitions, previously designated for training will not now be used for this purpose and will be instead destroyed, resulting in a further decrease in the numbers retained.” According to the presentation, “the complete stock of retained cluster munitions will be used up even earlier than 2020 as well as approximately 50% of the retained submunitions.” It stated that the quantity of the munitions retained based on EOD personnel training needs over a 10-year period means “on average…that two to four items of live munitions are expended during the course for each participant.”[49]
In June 2012, the Federal Foreign Office provided the Monitor with a list of criteria used by the Federal Office of Defence Technology and Procurement to determine the number of cluster munitions to be retained for training.[50]
[1] “Ausführungsgesetz zu Artikel 26 Abs. 2 des Deutschen Grundgesetzes (Gesetz über die Kontrolle von Kriegswaffen)” (“Act Implementing Article 26(2) of the Basic Law (War Weapons Control Act)”), 20 April 1961, Sections 18(a) and 21. The Act was amended on 6 June 2009 and entered into force on 11 June 2009 after it was published in the 2009 Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) II-502. See Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Reports, Form A, 27 January 2011 and 30 April 2012. The act also establishes extraterritorial jurisdiction over German citizens violating its law overseas—Section 21 of the Weapons Control Act. See Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Harvard International Human Rights Clinic, “Fulfilling the Ban: Guidelines for Effective National Legislation to Implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” June 2010, p. 38.
[2] A range of time periods are covered by the transparency reports submitted on 27 January 2011 (for the period from 1 August to 31 December 2010), 2012 (calendar year 2011), 2013 (calendar year 2012), and 2014 (calendar year 2013).
[3] For more details on Germany’s cluster munition policy and practice up to early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 78–84. It has come to light that the United States (US) engaged with Germany during the Oslo Process to communicate its concerns especially with respect to “interoperability” (joint military operations with states not party). In a US Department of State cable dated 13 February 2008 that was released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011, conventional arms control desk officer Burkhard Ducoffre reportedly informed the US that Germany did not favor doing anything that could limit military cooperation with states not party, whether it be in the context of a UN Chapter VII mission or a NATO operation, and said Germany favored adding an explicit exception to this effect in the draft text of the ban convention. “Germany agrees that Oslo Process text on cluster munitions should not hinder interoperability,” US Department of State cable 08BERLIN173 dated 13 February 2008, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.
[4] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.
[5] Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia, as well as Spain attended. RACVIAC, “Symposium on Mine Action,” 22–26 April 2014; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Silke Bellmann, Federal Foreign Office, 1 July 2014.
[6] Statement by Amb. Michael Biontino, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.
[7] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Silke Bellmann, Federal Foreign Office, 1 July 2014. See also, response to Monitor questionnaire by Volker Böhm, Federal Foreign Office, June 2013.
[8] On 18 October 2012, Federal Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said that any use of cluster munitions in Syria would be “a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law” to be condemned “in the strongest terms.” At the convention’s intersessional meetings in April 2013, Germany strongly condemned Syria’s use of cluster munitions, stating, “the use of these indiscriminate weapons cannot be justified.” See “Westerwelle besorgt wegen Einsatzes von Streubomben in Syrien” (“Westerwelle concerned about use of cluster bombs in Syria”), Die Welt, 18 October 2012; and statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 17 April 2013. Notes by HRW.
[9] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.
[10] “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/RES/68/182, 18 December 2013. Germany voted in favor of a similar resolution on 15 May 2013.
[11] Email from the German Federal Foreign Office, Division 241, 13 June 2012.
[12] Section 18(a) of the War Weapons Control Act states that it is prohibited to “transport [cluster munitions] through or otherwise bring them into or out of a federal territory.” See HRW and Harvard International Human Rights Clinic, “Fulfilling the Ban: Guidelines for Effective National Legislation to Implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” June 2010, p. 15.
[13] A US cable dated 2 December 2008 citing a discussion between US officials and Gregor Köbel, Director of the Conventional Arms Control Division of the German Federal Foreign Office, states “Koebel stressed that the US will continue to be able to store and transport CM [Cluster Munitions] in Germany, noting that this should be of ‘no concern whatsoever to our American colleagues.’” “MFA gives reassurances on stockpiling of US cluster munitions in Germany,” US Department of State cable 08BERLIN1609 dated 2 December 2008, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.
[14] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Volker Böhm, Federal Foreign Office, 13 June 2013. In 2012, the Federal Foreign Office informed the Monitor that the “Federal Government expects…German financial institutions to respect the legal obligations under the War Weapons Control Act and to implement their voluntary commitments aimed at disinvesting in the field of [cluster munitions]” and added that it is “following the relevant developments closely.” Email from the German Federal Foreign Office, Division 241, 13 June 2012.
[15] See Motion presented by the Social Democratic Party, the Left Party, and the Alliance 90/Greens, “Investitionen in Antipersonenminen und Streumunition gesetzlich verbieten und die steuerliche Förderung beenden” (“A legal prohibition on tax incentives and investments in antipersonnel mines and cluster munitions”), German Parliament (Bundestag) 17/7339, 18 October 2011; and Bundestag, Stenographic Report, 168th Meeting, Plenary Proceedings 17/168, 22 March 2012.
[16] IKV Pax Christi and FairFin, “Worldwide investments in Cluster Munitions: a shared responsibility,” December 2013, pp. 12, 46, 58, 111, and 112.
[17] Letter from Gregor Köbel, Federal Foreign Office, 5 February 2009.
[18] Email from Jörg-Alexander Albrecht, Desk Officer, Conventional Arms Control, Federal Foreign Office, 30 April 2010.
[19] Letter from Gregor Köbel, Federal Foreign Office, 5 February 2009.
[20] Germany did not list the production facilities or indicate measures taken to convert or decommission them. Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form E, 27 January 2011.
[21] In 2004, Germany transferred 270 M26 rockets and transferred another 132 in 2005, but it is unclear if these were transfers of individual rockets or pods containing six rockets each. Each M26 rocket has 644 submunitions. Submission of Germany, UN Register of Conventional Arms, Report for Calendar Year 2004, 26 May 2005; and Report for Calendar Year 2005, 1 June 2006.
[22] The MLRS program was known as the Mittleres Artillerieraketenwerfersystem (MARS). Leland S. Ness and Anthony G. Williams, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2007–2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2007), p. 716. The 110mm Light Artillery Rocket System was in service with the German Army from 1969 until the mid-1980s, and a submunition warhead was developed for this weapon but was apparently not placed into production. Terry J. Gander, ed., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 1997–1998 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 1997), p. 533.
[23] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), pp. 360–361. RTG Euromunition GmbH acted as the exporter for the MW-1. According to the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS), after 1996 production of MW-1 was undertaken by Daimler-Benz-Aerospace (DASA). Email from Thomas Küchenmeister, Director, Actiongroup Landmine.de, 24 April 2009.
[24] These DPICM submunitions included non-self-destructing (DM1348) and self-destructing (DM1383) variants designed in Germany, as well as a self-destructing type designed in Israel (M85, also known as DM1385 when contained in German-produced projectiles).
[25] In June 2007, Rheinmetall stated that its involvement in cluster munition production had ended: “Cluster ammunition and/or subammunitions [sic] for such ordnance, bombs and cluster bombs do not belong to those goods which are developed, produced or assembled by Rheinmetall nor any of our subsidiaries.” Letter from Rheinmetall to Norges Bank (acting on behalf of the Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund-Global), 5 June 2007, unofficial translation by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, cited in Norwegian Ministry of Finance, “Til rådning - Ny vurdering av selskapet Rheinmetall AG” (“Recommendation - New assessment of the company Rheinmetall AG”), 5 September 2007.
[26] Article 2.2(c) of the Convention on Cluster Munitions excludes munitions with submunitions if they have less than 10 submunitions and each submunition weighs more than four kilograms, can detect and engage a single target object, and is equipped with electronic self-destruction and self-deactivation features.
[27] Rheinmetall DeTec AG press release, “SMArt 155—Proven Reliability and Accuracy,” June 2005; and letter from Peter Hooton, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 27 April 2010. In October 2007, it was reported that Australia “has finalised the acquisition of SMArt 155 artillery rounds worth AUD14 million (US$ 12.3 million) for its 36 M198 155mm towed howitzers.” Jane’s Defence Weekly, 4 October 2007.
[28] Actiongroup Landmine.de, “Alternative Streumunition - Problem oder Lösung?” (“Alternative Cluster Munitions - Problem or Solution?”), August 2008. According to Alliant, as of January 2005, over 11,000 SMArt-155 projectiles had been produced by consortium members. Alliant Techsystems press release, “ATK/GIWS SMArt 155 Sensor Fuzed Munition Succeeds in UAE Desert Tests,” 10 January 2005.
[29] Information provided by email from Thomas Küchenmeister, Facing Finance, 27 May 2011; and letter from Federal Ministry of Defence to Uta Zapf, Member of Parliament, 16 March 2011. Information was not provided on the costs of acquisition and development of SMArt-155mm GMLRS versions.
[30] Diehl Defense website, “SMArt® 155 Artillery Ammunition.”
[31] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, 30 April 2014.
[32] Ibid., April 2013, 30 April 2012, and 27 January 2011.
[33] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 11 September 2012; statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Second Meeting of States Parties, Beirut, 14 September 2011; response to HRW letter by Dr. Detlev Wolter, Head of Division, Conventional Arms Control, Federal Foreign Office, 2 May 2011; email from Jörg-Alexander Albrecht, Federal Foreign Office, 30 April 2010; and email from Thomas Frisch, “German National Stockpile Destruction Programme,” Federal Ministry of Defense, 25 June 2009.
[34] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.
[35] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, April 2014.
[36] Ibid.
[37] Ibid.
[38] Response of the Federal Government to questions by Agnes Malczak, Dr. Gerhard Shick, Marie Luise Beck, other parliament members (Bundestagsabgeordnete), and the Alliance 90/Greens parliamentary group, “Implementation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” 17/2972, 5 October 2010.
[39] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Reports, Form B, 30 April 2014, April 2013, 30 April 2012, and 27 January 2011.
[40] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
[41] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, April 2013. Average exchange rate for 2012: €1=US$1.2859. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.
[42] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2014.
[43] Ibid., April 2013, and April 2012.
[44] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, April 2014.
[45] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, April 2013.
[46] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2012.
[47] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2014.
[48] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
[49] Presentation and statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 13 September 2012.
[50] Email from the German Federal Foreign Office, Division 241, 13 June 2012. See also statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
Mine Action
Contamination and Impact
The Federal Republic of Germany is contaminated with cluster munitions and other unexploded ordnance (UXO) at a former Soviet military training range at Wittstock, Brandenburg (in former East Germany) dating from the period of the area’s use by Soviet and Russian armed forces. In August 2014, Germany reported that an area of 11km2 was suspected to contain single Soviet-era ShOAB 0.5 submunitions—almost three times the area than previously reported (4km2).[1] The contamination by UXO has been described as “extensive.”[2]
In June 2011, Germany reported that contamination at Wittstock was suspected to include antipersonnel landmines.[3] In December 2013, Germany reported that “the suspicion of there being anti-personnel mines present has not been substantiated.”[4]
Mines
Germany first reported its suspicion that it might be contaminated with antipersonnel mines covering an area of 125km2 in June 2011 at the Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Clearance.[5] In 2012, Germany reported that the suspected contaminated area was approximately 10,000m2 and located in the northeast of the property.[6] Germany had previously declared in its Article 7 reports covering the years prior to 2011 that there were no confirmed or suspected mined areas under its jurisdiction or control.[7]
Following a combination of non-technical and technical survey, in addition to clearance activities, Germany reported the following December that “The area is no longer seen as a suspected APM [antipersonnel mine] area.”[8]
Cluster munitions remnants
Germany is also contaminated with cluster munition remnants. In its initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report, Germany had declared no confirmed or suspected cluster munition contaminated areas.[9] In June 2011 at the Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee meetings, however, Germany declared for the first time that it suspected it had areas containing cluster munition remnants at the former Soviet military training range at Wittstock in Brandenburg.[10] It repeated the information at the Convention on Cluster Munitions intersessional meeting a week later, noting that the remnants were “principally found within the confines of a target range” located at the south of the training area.
At the Third Meeting of States Parties to the Cluster Munitions Convention in September 2012, Germany reported that the suspected hazardous area (SHA) was some 4km2 in size and located in the eastern center of the training area.[11] Germany reported the suspected contamination in its second Article 7 report submitted in 2013 and indicated that survey of the area was ongoing.[12]
In its Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report of April 2014, Germany reiterated that suspected cluster munitions contamination covered an estimated 4km2.[13] However, in August 2014 Germany reported to the Monitor that, at 11km2, the area suspected of contamination was considerably higher than the previously reported 4km2, despite stating that “archive research” had “narrowed down the suspected area.”[14]
Mine Action Program
In early October 2011, ownership of the Wittstock former training range was transferred from the military to the governmental authority in charge of real estate—Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (BImA).
As the new owner, the BImA developed a mine risk program in collaboration with local authorities which began implementation in 2012 and was focused on a “danger prevention plan” that was a described as a “crucial prerequisite” for further technical survey of the area.[15] Activities included risk reduction measures such as marking the perimeter and preventing civilian access to the area, instigation of a risk education program, and development of a strategic action concept designed to “create the necessary infrastructure for further targeted survey.”[16]
The program included plans for an initial survey of access routes, areas of suspected UXO contamination in neighboring locations, and necessary firebreaks using geomagnetic survey methods as a first step towards allowing construction of infrastructure it considered would be required for clearance personnel to safely clear the affected areas. Technical survey and clearance would be undertaken, if necessary, to clear the area in preparation for infrastructure construction, after which clearance of the remaining SHA could be undertaken.[17] The cost of clearance would be met by the BImA.
Once cleared, the site was planned to remain part of a “nature protection area” in the Kyritz-Ruppiner-Heide, managed by the BImA as part of the Europa NATURA 2000 network.[18]
Survey in 2013
Germany reported that initial survey activities of the areas suspected of mine contamination had commenced in March 2013.[19] Following a combination of non-technical and technical survey, as well as physical clearance, no contamination was found and the area was reported free of mines in December 2013.[20]
At the Convention on Cluster Munitions Working Group on Clearance and Risk Reduction intersessional meetings in April 2012, Germany announced plans to conduct technical survey and, if necessary, some clearance during 2012 of a 40km-long and 50-meter-wide tract of land to ensure fire prevention and environment protection; during the same period it would also clear a network of paths and tracks to enable emergency management.[21] In April 2013, Germany reported a technical survey of the SHA was ongoing.[22] By August 2014, it was stated that preparations for a “technical investigation” were underway to survey and, if necessary, clear any cluster munition remnants. Technical survey of the first section of suspected area was envisaged to begin in 2015.[23]
Article 5 Compliance
Germany’s original deadline for destroying all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control would have been 1 March 1999 had Germany been aware of the contaminated area.
In April 2013—under the new procedure established for States Parties finding new mined areas after their initial clearance deadline had passed—Germany submitted an Article 5 deadline Extension Request until 31 December 2015, citing the need to conduct survey and the late identification of the affected area as reasons why clearance could not be completed prior to the Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in December 2013.[24]
Following the results of its survey and clearance activities in 2013, Germany withdrew its deadline request in November 2013.[25] As no mine contamination had been found, a clearance deadline was unnecessary.
Compliance with Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Germany is required to destroy all cluster munition remnants in areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 August 2020.
Germany has not yet reported the clearance of any cluster munition remnants. Germany has reported that a “technical investigation” is currently under preparation and expected to commence in 2015.[26]
[1] Email from Silke Bellmann, Desk Officer for Conventional Arms Control, Federal Foreign Office, 4 August 2014; and Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, 30 April 2014.
[2] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 27 May 2013.
[3] Ibid., 21 June 2011.
[4] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[5] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 21 June 2011.
[6] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 6 December 2012.
[7] See previous Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports on UN Office at Geneva website.
[8] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[9] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for the period 1 August through 31 December 2010), Form F.
[10] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 21 June 2011.
[11] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Third Meeting of States Parties, Oslo, 13 September 2012.
[12] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, April 2013.
[14] Email from Silke Bellmann, Federal Foreign Office, 4 August 2014.
[15] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 23 May 2012.
[16] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form G, 4 April 2012.
[17] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Standing Committee on Mine Action, Geneva, 27 May 2012; and statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 6 December 2012.
[18] Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 15 April 2013, p. 7.
[19] Ibid.
[20] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2014.
[21] Statement of Germany, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Working Group on Clearance and Risk Reduction, Geneva, 17 April 2012.
[22] Ibid., 17 April 2013.
[23] Email from Silke Bellmann, Federal Foreign Office, 4 August 2014.
[24] Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 15 April 2013.
[25] Statement of Germany, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[26] Email from Silke Bellmann, Federal Foreign Office, 4 August 2014.
Support for Mine Action
In 2012, the Federal Republic of Germany provided €18,507,427 (US$23,798,700)[1] in mine action funding to 20 countries and one other area through international and national NGOs, national mine action authorities, the UN, Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, and the ITF Enhancing Human Security. This compares to €16.9 million ($23.6 million) in 2011. The combined contributions of €6.9 million ($8.9 million) to Afghanistan and Libya represent 38% of all funding from Germany in 2012.
Contributions by recipient: 2012[2]
Recipient |
Sector |
Amount (€) |
Amount ($) |
Afghanistan |
Clearance, victim assistance |
4,800,000 |
6,172,320 |
Libya |
Clearance, risk education |
2,198,045 |
2,826,466 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Clearance |
1,315,916 |
1,692,136 |
Lao PDR |
Clearance, victim assistance |
1,309,350 |
1,683,693 |
Lebanon |
Clearance |
1,216,072 |
1,563,747 |
Cambodia |
Clearance |
1,100,000 |
1,414,490 |
Vietnam |
Clearance, victim assistance |
929,868 |
1,195,717 |
Tajikistan |
Clearance |
831,866 |
1,069,696 |
Colombia |
Clearance, victim assistance |
818,178 |
1,052,095 |
South Sudan |
Clearance |
500,000 |
642,950 |
Egypt |
Clearance |
500,000 |
642,950 |
Croatia |
Clearance |
490,000 |
630,091 |
Somaliland |
Clearance |
459,000 |
590,228 |
Iraq |
Clearance |
439,235 |
564,812 |
Yemen |
Clearance |
401,263 |
515,984 |
Jordan |
Clearance |
370,505 |
476,432 |
Global |
Various |
264,925 |
340,667 |
Palau |
Clearance |
136,633 |
175,696 |
Mauritania |
Clearance |
125,000 |
160,738 |
Sri Lanka |
Victim assistance |
112,571 |
144,755 |
Uganda |
Victim assistance |
99,000 |
127,304 |
Serbia |
Clearance |
90,000 |
115,731 |
Total |
|
18,507,427 |
23,798,700 |
In 2012, Germany contributed 92% of its mine action support to clearance activities and 5% to victim assistance. Another 3% was allocated to risk education and other global activities.
Contributions by thematic sector: 2012
Sector |
Amount (€) |
Amount ($) |
% of total contribution |
Clearance |
17,108,093 |
21,999,297 |
92 |
Victim assistance |
752,409 |
967,523 |
4 |
Risk education |
292,000 |
375,483 |
2 |
Global |
264,925 |
340,667 |
1 |
Total |
18,507,427 |
23,798,700 |
100 |
Since 2008, Germany has consistently contributed approximately €17 million ($24 million) each year in support for mine action.
Summary of contributions: 2008–2012[3]
Year |
Amount (€) |
Amount ($) |
2012 |
18,507,427 |
23,798,700 |
2011 |
16,964,425 |
23,633,140 |
2010 |
17,610,877 |
23,353,783 |
2009 |
17,003,007 |
23,693,690 |
2008 |
18,148,899 |
26,726,068 |
Total |
88,234,635 |
121,205,381 |
[1] Average exchange rate for 2012: €1=US$1.2859. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.
[2] Convention on Conventional Weapons Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, 23 March 2013.
[3] See previous editions of Landmine Monitor; and ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Germany: Support for Mine Action,” 19 September 2012. Amounts in US$ have been rounded to the nearest ten. Average exchange rate for 2012: €1=US$1.2859; 2011: €1=US$1.3931; 2010: €1=US$1.3261; 2009: €1=US$ 1.3935; and 2008: €1=US$1.4726. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.