Guinea Bissau
Mine Ban Policy
Policy
Guinea-Bissau signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 22 May 2001, becoming a State Party on 1 November 2001. In December 2004, the Minister of Foreign Affairs said Guinea-Bissau was planning to enact domestic legislation to implement the treaty,[1] but in July 2007, the director of the National Mine Action Coordination Center (CAAMI) told the Monitor that the government would not adopt a new law as the treaty automatically became national law under the constitution, making mine-related crimes subject to existing penal sanctions.[2] Guinea-Bissau has reported that the Mine Ban Treaty was approved by parliament on 13 December 2000 and subsequently by the office of the president by a decree, thus entering the Convention’s obligations into law in Guinea-Bissau.[3]
Guinea-Bissau submitted its 10th Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report in 2011. As of 1 October 2012, it had yet to provide the annual updated report due April 2012.
Guinea-Bissau attended the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Phnom Penh in November–December 2011, as well as the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in May 2012.
Guinea-Bissau is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war, but it has not submitted an Article 13 report for Amended Protocol II.
Production, transfer, stockpiling, and retention
Guinea-Bissau has reported that it never produced or exported antipersonnel mines. On 17 October 2005, Guinea-Bissau destroyed the last of its 10,654 stockpiled antipersonnel mines, just ahead of its stockpile destruction deadline of 1 November 2005.[4]
In December 2011, Guinea-Bissau demonstrated transparency by reporting that an ammunition storage assessment conducted jointly with the UN Mine Action Service had identified a small number of additional stockpiled antipersonnel mines in the military bases of Quebo and Gabu.[5] Seven PMN mines were found, as well as two boxes containing an undetermined number of POMZ-2 mines. Guinea-Bissau stated its intention to destroy them no later than 31 March 2012, but as of September 2012 the Monitor had not received a confirmation that the mines had been destroyed. Under the Cartagena Action Plan, a State Party that discovers stockpiled mines after the expiration of its deadline must share such information with States Parties as soon as possible and destroy the mines as a matter of urgent priority.
In its 2008 Article 7 report, Guinea-Bissau reported having retained 109 mines for training purposes.[6] However, 100 of these—50 POMZ-2 and 50 PMD-6—were listed as “disarmed.”[7] In its 2009 report, Guinea-Bissau stated that the 50 POMZ-2 mines had been recycled for metal use, and the 50 PMD-6 mines had also been destroyed.[8] In its subsequent Article 7 reports, Guinea-Bissau listed only nine mines as retained for training: six PMN, one M409, and two M969 mines. Most recently, in 2011, Guinea-Bissau reported that there was no training underway.[9]
Use
There have been no reports of use of antipersonnel mines in Guinea-Bissau since March and April 2006, when a faction of the Senegal-based Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance (Mouvement des Forces Démocratiques de la Casamance, MFDC) fled from Senegal and laid both antipersonnel and antivehicle mines in northern Guinea-Bissau.[10]
[1] Statement by Soares Sambu, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mine Ban Treaty First Review Conference, Nairobi, 2 December 2004.
[2] Email from César de Carvalho, General Director, CAAMI, 19 July 2007. This point has been stated in Guinea-Bissau’s Article 7 reports; see, for example, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report 2006 (for the period 30 April 2005 to 30 April 2006), Form A. The report cites Articles 85.1, para. h), and 68, para. e), of the Constitution as making the treaty national law, and Article 206 of the Penal Code, which allows sentencing of crimes. Penal Code Article 206, Number 1 prohibits the use of explosives.
[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A (for the period 30 April 2010 to 30 April 2011), www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/D75A9B0BF218349FC125789900302965/$file/Guinea-Bissau+2010.pdf.
[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms F and G (for the period 30 April 2005 to 30 April 2006); and Landmine Monitor Report 2006, pp. 461–462. Guinea-Bissau destroyed 4,943 antipersonnel mines on 17 October 2005; 1,000 mines on 12 September 2002; and 4,711 mines in February 1998. There are differences between the numbers of stockpiled mines Guinea-Bissau declared in its previous Article 7 reports and the number destroyed in October 2005.
[5] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Eleventh Meeting of States Parties, Phnom Penh, 1 December 2011.
[6] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report. Form D (for the period April 2007 to April 2008). Guinea-Bissau had made inconsistent statements about its intent to retain mines for training purposes. See Landmine Monitor Report 2005, p. 377.
[7] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D (for the period 30 April 2005 to 30 April 2006). At the time of the final destruction in October 2005, Guinea-Bissau said that it would retain 67 mines. This included 58 disarmed mines (50 POMZ-2 and eight PMD-6) and nine active. Letter to Kerry Brinkert, Director, Implementation Support Unit, Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, from César de Carvalho, CAAMI, 20 October 2005.
[8] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D (for 30 April 2008 to 30 April 2009).
[9] Under mines retained for training, Guinea-Bissau stated “No training for us is taking place.” Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D (for the period 30 April 2010 to 30 April 2011), www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/D75A9B0BF218349FC125789900302965/$file/Guinea-Bissau+2010.pdf.
[10] For details, see Landmine Monitor Report 2006, pp. 463–464. In April 2006, Guinea-Bissau declared that it had ousted rebel forces from its territory. The ICBL condemned the antipersonnel mine use in northern Guinea-Bissau and noted that the MFDC in 1999 signed the Banjul Declaration, which among other things, committed the group to cease using landmines.
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Convention on Cluster Munitions status |
State Party |
National implementation legislation |
Considers existing law sufficient to enforce the convention |
Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings |
Attended Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka in September 2013 and intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2014 |
Key developments |
Stockpile destruction plan in preparation, and has requested technical and financial assistance to destroy the stockpile |
Policy
The Republic of Guinea-Bissau signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008, ratified on 29 November 2010, and the convention entered into force for the country on 1 May 2011.
In May 2013, Guinea-Bissau stated that it considers existing laws sufficient to implement both the Convention on Cluster Munitions and the Mine Ban Treaty, and said that sanctions for any violations are addressed by the country’s penal code.[1]
As of 27 June 2014, Guinea-Bissau still had not submitted its initial Article 7 transparency measures report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions, originally due by 28 October 2011. In September 2013, Guinea-Bissau indicated that it was preparing the report.[2] In May 2013, it said the report had not been submitted due to lack of information on stockpiled cluster munitions.[3]
Guinea-Bissau participated in some meetings of the Oslo Process that created the convention, including the formal negotiations in Dublin in May 2008, where it supported other African states in opposing efforts to weaken the convention text and joined in the consensus adoption of the text.[4]
Guinea-Bissau has continued to engage in the work of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It has participated in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention, including the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013. Guinea-Bissau has attended every intersessional meeting of the convention in Geneva, including those held in April 2014.
Guinea-Bissau participated in a regional meeting of the convention in Lomé, Togo in May 2013, where it condemned the Syrian government’s use of cluster munitions.[5]
Guinea-Bissau voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 68/182 on 18 December 2013, which expressed “outrage” at Syrian government’s “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights” including the use of cluster munitions.[6]
Guinea-Bissau is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Guinea-Bissau has yet to provide its views on certain important issues related to interpretation and implementation of the convention, including the prohibition on transit, the prohibition on assistance during joint military operations with states not party that may use cluster munitions, the prohibition on foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions, the prohibition on investment in production of cluster munitions, and the need for retention of cluster munitions and submunitions for training and development purposes.
Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling
In 2008, Guinea-Bissau stated that it does not use or produce cluster munitions.[7] Guinea-Bissau possesses cluster munitions of Soviet origin, but the size and content of the current stockpile is not known.[8] In June 2011, the director of Guinea-Bissau’s National Mine Action Coordination Center (Centro Nacional de Coordenação da Acção Anti-Minas, CAAMI) said that it was conducting an inventory of the quantities, types, and origins of the stockpile held at an air force base in Bissau City.[9] RBK-series air-dropped bombs and PTAB-2.5 submunitions were among munitions ejected by an explosion at the Paiol de Bra ammunition storage facility on the outskirts of Bissau City in 2000.[10]
Under Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Guinea-Bissau is required to destroy all its stockpiled cluster munitions as soon as possible, but not later than 1 May 2019.
In September and May 2013, Guinea-Bissau stated that it had requested assistance from the UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) to destroy its stockpile, but the political situation in the country had stalled the process.[11] In September 2013, it appealed to States Parties to assist stockpiling destruction efforts, stating that it “alone cannot address this challenge, we need solidarity of international community, and from others States Parties and not parties.” Guinea-Bissau said that a February 2011 technical assessment by UNMAS found the weapons held at armed forces locations to be “stockpiled in very bad conditions.”[12] In the absence of an Article 7 report, Guinea-Bissau has not indicated if it will retain cluster munitions for training purposes as permitted by Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
[1] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013.
[2] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
[3] Ibid. In June 2011, Guinea-Bissau noted that submission of the Article 7 report could be delayed due to its review of the status of stockpiled cluster munitions. Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Session on Clearance and Risk Reduction, Geneva, 29 June 2011.
[4] For details on Guinea-Bissau’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 86–87.
[5] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013.
[6] “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 68/182, 18 December 2013.
[7] Statement by Amb. Augusto Artur António Silva, Secretary of State and International Cooperation, Convention on Cluster Munitions Signing Conference, Oslo, 4 December 2008.
[8] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 29 June 2011.
[9] Interview with César Luis Gomes Lopes de Carvalho, General Director, CAAMI, in Geneva, 27 June 2011.
[10] Cleared Ground Demining, “Guinea Bissau Project Update,” undated but 2006,.
[11] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Lomé Regional Seminar on the Universalization of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Lomé, Togo, 23 May 2013; and statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
[12] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 11 September 2013.
Mine Action
Contamination and Impact
As a result of armed conflicts dating back to 1963, Guinea-Bissau is contaminated by mines (both antipersonnel and antivehicle) and explosive remnants of war (ERW). Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) conducted a national mine and ERW survey in Guinea-Bissau from September 2010 to June 2011. At the end of the survey, 17 hazardous areas remained to be cleared: 11 contain mines and six contain ERW.[1]
Mines
As of June 2011, a total of 11 mined areas identified by NPA during survey in 2010–2011 remained to be released across six regions (Bafatá, Bolama, Cacheu, Oio, Quinara, and Tombali), covering an estimated 250,539m2.[2] In addition, parts of two mined areas identified during an earlier impact survey remained to be released across two regions (Cacheu and Tombali), covering an estimated area of 29,451m².[3]
Cluster munition remnants
It is not known to what extent Guinea-Bissau is still contaminated with cluster munition remnants. The last known unexploded submunitions were said to have been destroyed by Cleared Ground Demining (CGD) in August 2008,[4] although Guinea-Bissau submitted a Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report in 2009 which referred to “some clusters” at the Paiol da Bra ammunition storage area (ASA).[5] Subsequently, CGD reported clearing 73 PTAB 2.5M submunitions at Paiol da Bra in 2009.[6]
In June 2010, the general director of the National Mine Action Coordination Center (Centro Nacional de Coordenção da Accão Anti-Minas, CAAMI) acknowledged the existence of a cluster munition problem, but stated that survey was needed to identify its extent.[7] During 2010, CGD found and destroyed six unexploded PTAB 2.5M submunitions during subsurface clearance at Paiol da Bra.[8] In March 2011, NPA stated that no unexploded submunitions had been found during their survey of explosive contamination in Guinea-Bissau, nor did they expect to find any, although it is believed that cluster munition stockpiles may still exist.[9]
Other explosive remnants of war
The 2007–2008 impact survey found five battle areas (not including the ASA at Paiol da Bra) covering an estimated 0.93km2.[10] The survey was not able to visit all suspected hazardous areas because of security or access problems.[11] According to CAAMI, other areas would be added to the list once additional survey had been conducted.[12] The NPA survey found six areas containing ERW across three regions (Bafatá, Oio, and Quinara), covering an estimated 107,254m2. There are also 42 areas containing scattered ERW.[13]
The capital, Bissau, was contaminated by large quantities of ERW around the Paiol de Bra ASA, although clearance by CGD was reportedly completed on 25 May 2010.[14]
Mine Action Program
Key institutions and operators
Body |
Situation on 1 January 2011 |
National Mine Action Authority |
National Commission for Humanitarian Demining (Comissão Nacional para Desminagem Humanitária, CNDH) |
Mine action center |
CAAMI |
International demining operators |
Two NGOs: CGD and NPA |
National demining operators |
Two NGOs: HUMAID and Lutamos Todos Contra As Minas (LUTCAM) |
CAAMI, which was established in 2001, coordinates mine action operations. It was brought under the responsibility of the Ministry of Defense at the end of 2009.[15] A new UNDP chief technical advisor started work in May 2009 after a gap of more than one year. Since his arrival, program management is said to have significantly improved.[16]
NPA was requested by CAAMI to assist with capacity-building and demining as well as to conduct a survey of mine/ERW contamination. It began operations in the summer of 2010.
Land Release
As noted above, land release in 2010 included cancelation of two suspected mined areas and release through technical survey of two further mined areas.
Five-year summary of land release[17]
Year |
Mined area cleared (m2) |
Battle area cleared (m2) |
2010 |
762,901 (including BAC) |
Not reported separately |
2009 |
488,029 |
354,888 |
2008 |
492,563 |
437,237 |
2007 |
102,474 |
685,879 |
2006 |
79,185 |
208,734 |
2005 |
124,389 |
0 |
Totals |
1,286,640 (not including 2010) |
1,686,738 (not including 2010) |
Survey in 2010
NPA conducted both non-technical and technical survey in 2010.[18]
Mine clearance in 2010
The total of mined area cleared in 2010 has not been reported separately from battle area clearance (BAC), but included the destruction of 390 antipersonnel mines and five antivehicle mines.[19] Demining is still primarily manual in Guinea-Bissau, which makes clearance slow and difficult.[20] As of the end of 2010, mine clearance capacity consisted of HUMAID’s 55 deminers and LUTCAM’s 44 deminers, the same as in 2009.[21] NPA destroyed two antipersonnel mines during technical survey operations in 2010.[22] It was planning to conduct mine clearance from July 2011.[23]
Compliance with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty
Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty (and in accordance with the two-month extension request granted in 2010), Guinea-Bissau is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 January 2012.
In June 2010, CAAMI’s director informed the Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies that Guinea-Bissau would need to request an extension to its Article 5 deadline “due to national capacity reduction and reporting of new affected areas in a considerable number.”[24] The Article 7 report had indicated that the request would be presented to the June 2010 intersessional Standing Committee meetings but this did not occur.[25]
On 8 September 2010, Guinea-Bissau submitted a request for a two-month extension to its Article 5 deadline. In granting the request, the Tenth Meeting of States Parties stated that, given that a financial shortfall could affect the realization of Guinea-Bissau’s plan, resource mobilization could be greatly aided if Guinea-Bissau demonstrated greater national ownership by making a national financial investment into Article 5 implementation. The Meeting further noted that while Guinea-Bissau has been slow to adopt efficient land release practices and that while its progress to date has been modest, Guinea-Bissau was making a commitment through its extension request to more efficiently and expediently proceed with Article 5 implementation.[26]
Indeed, clearance of mined areas has been extremely slow in Guinea-Bissau, with only about 1.3km2 of mined areas cleared in the last five years, and data, especially for 2009, does not appear to be reliable. Under Action Point 17 of the Cartagena Action Plan, adopted by the Second Review Conference, States Parties undertake to: “Provide annually, in accordance with Article 7, precise information on the number, location and size of mined areas, anticipated particular technical or operational challenges, plans to clear or otherwise release these areas and information on the areas already released, disaggregated by release through clearance, technical survey and non-technical survey.”
NPA reported in March 2011 that it expected clearance of mined areas to be completed before the end of the year.[27]
Clearance of cluster munition contaminated areas in 2010
In 2010, CGD cleared six unexploded PTAB 2.5M submunitions during subsurface clearance at the Paiol da Bra ASA.[28] CGD reported clearing 73 unexploded PTAB 2.5M submunitions at the Paiol da Bra ASA in 2009.[29]
Battle area clearance and explosive ordnance disposal in 2010[30]
The total of battle area cleared in 2010 has not been reported separately from mined area clearance, but included the destruction of 12,455 items of unexploded ordnance and 381 fuzes.[31] As of 1 August 2011, Guinea-Bissau had not submitted its initial Article 10 transparency report under Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol V on explosive remnants of war, due on 5 August 2009.
It is not clear to what extent Guinea-Bissau’s reported figures include CGD’s BAC and explosive ordnance disposal, since CGD alone reported to the Monitor the destruction of a total of 13,543 ERW[32] (although the total includes an unspecified number of weapons). To conduct demolitions, the Guinea-Bissau military allows CGD to have antivehicle mines as donor charges. For 2010, it was provided with 96 C3A and two TM48 antivehicle mines.[33]
Community liaison
Community liaison capacity has so far been weak in Guinea-Bissau. CAAMI’s risk education (RE) department has liaison personnel in the regions that update CAAMI from time to time with information on suspected areas, the need for RE interventions, and new incidents.[34]
Community liaison was, though, said to be an important aspect of CGD’s roving teams’ activities, with one liaison officer in each team. Community meetings are often held to explain the team’s activities.[35]
Quality management
In early 2007, it was reported that new national mine action standards (NMAS) were being drafted. In 2010, a Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining mission was conducted in order to assist Guinea-Bissau with the creation of NMAS.[36]
CAAMI quality assurance/quality control capacity is located inside its operations department. Visits are said to be conducted regularly to all clearance sites, with priority given to the beginning and end of each task.[37]
Safety of demining personnel
No injuries to demining personnel were recorded in 2009 or 2010.[38]
[1] Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, “Landmine and ERW Survey in Guinea-Bissau, Final Report,” Draft, July 2011, p. 5; and email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, Program Manager, NPA, 12 August 2011.
[2] Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, “Landmine and ERW Survey in Guinea-Bissau, Final Report,” Draft, July 2011, pp. 5, 25, and 26.
[3] Email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 12 August 2011.
[4] Email from Cassandra McKeown, Finance Director, CGD, 22 April 2009.
[5] See Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2008 to 30 April 2009), Form C.
[6] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 21 June 2010.
[7] Interview with César de Carvalho, General Director, CAAMI, in Geneva, 23 June 2010.
[8] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 28 April 2011.
[9] Email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 11 March 2011.
[10] See Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2008 to 30 April 2009), Form C.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Email from Tomas Lourenço, Mine Action Chief Technical Advisor, UNDP/CAAMI, 6 April 2010.
[13] Mário Nunes, “Landmine and ERW Survey in Guinea-Bissau, Final Report,” Draft, July 2011, p. 5; and emails from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 11 March and 12 August 2011.
[14] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 June 2010.
[15] Interview with César de Carvalho, CAAMI, in Geneva, 23 June 2010
[16] NPA, “Assessment Mission Report Guinea Bissau,” Oslo, November 2009.
[17] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 21 June 2011; email from Tomas Lourenço, UNDP/CAAMI, 6 April 2010; and Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2009 to 30 April 2010), Form G. Data from the latter two sources as well as others provided to the Monitor differ with respect to clearance in 2009. In addition, reports of the extent of clearance in 2008 differ to the data provided earlier to the Monitor.
[18] Email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 11 March 2011.
[19] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 21 June 2011.
[20] Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2009 to 30 April 2010), Form J.
[21] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 21 June 2011.
[22] Email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 11 March 2011.
[23] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 21 June 2011
[24] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 22 June 2010.
[25] Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2009 to 30 April 2010), Form J.
[26] Decisions on the Request Submitted by Guinea-Bissau for an Extension of the Deadline for Completing the Destruction of Anti-Personnel Mines in Accordance with Article 5 of the Convention.
[27] Email from Mário Penedo Tomé Nunes, NPA, 11 March 2011.
[28] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 28 April 2011.
[29] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 21 June 2010.
[30] This does not include clearance of cluster munition contaminated areas.
[31] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, Geneva, 21 June 2011.
[32] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 28 April 2011.
[33] Ibid.
[34] Email from Tomas Lourenço, UNDP/CAAMI, 6 August 2009.
[35] Email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 10 June 2010.
[36] Ibid.; and interview with César de Carvalho, CAAMI, in Geneva, 23 June 2010.
[37] Email from Tomas Lourenço, UNDP/CAAMI, 6 August 2009.
[38] Email from Tomas Lourenço, UNDP/CAAMI, 6 April 2010; and email from Cassandra McKeown, CGD, 28 April 2011.
Casualties and Victim Assistance
Action points based on findings
· Dedicate increased national and international funding to address the needs and promote the rights of mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) survivors and other persons with disabilities. Over the last decade, there has been little progress overall in improving access and quality of assistance to survivors in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau due to lack of funds and of government support.
· Ensure that broader programs, such as international cooperation for post-conflict reconstruction and political stabilization efforts, reach the most vulnerable members of society, including survivors and other persons with disabilities.
· Empower mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities to advocate for equal opportunities and increased access to assistance.
Victim assistance commitments
Guinea-Bissau is responsible for a significant number of landmine survivors, cluster munition victims and survivors of other ERW who are in need. Guinea-Bissau has made commitments to provide victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty and Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V; it also has victim assistance obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Casualties
Casualties Overview
All known casualties by end 2013 |
1,533 mine/ERW casualties from 1963 to December 2013 |
Casualties in 2013 |
10 (2012: 5) |
2013 casualties by outcome |
3 killed; 7 injured (2012: 2 killed, 1 injured) |
2013 casualties by device type |
1 unspecified mine; 9 ERW |
In 2013, 10 mine/ERW casualties were recorded in Guinea-Bissau, all within the Region of Oio. Two incidents were caused by ERW, resulting in a total of nine casualties, a man and eight children.[1] In April 2013, a 13-year-old boy was killed by a landmine. The number of casualties in 2013 was twice the number of mine/ERW casualties that occurred in 2012.
There were a total of 1,533 casualties from mines/ERW reported, dating from 1963 to December 2013.[2] However, this was not believed to be a comprehensive figure.[3] An estimated 80% of all casualties have been male, the majority of whom were farmers.[4] No information was available on whether the figure included both military and civilian casualties.
Cluster munition casualties
While the total number of casualties from cluster munitions is not known in Guinea-Bissau, there were 11 casualties in 1998 during an attack on a weapons depot; the explosion that caused the casualties involved cluster munitions.[5]
Victim Assistance
As of December 2013, there were more than 1,410 mine/ERW survivors recorded in Guinea-Bissau. Some of these may have already died, but it is likely there are many more unrecorded.[6]
Victim assistance coordination
In 2013, the National Mine Action Coordination Center (Centro Nacional de Coordenação da Accão Anti-Minas (CAAMI), the national focal point for victim assistance, found its efforts to coordinate victim assistance largely stymied due to a lack of national or international resources.[7] Mine/ERW survivors were included in a target of the National Poverty Reduction Strategy 2011–2015 that aims for the “equal opportunity for rehabilitation, and reintegration of all persons with disabilities (victim of armed dispute or conflict, included the mine/ERW injured people),” their full participation in the socio-economic reconstruction, and the re-establishment of their rights and dignity.[8]
At the end of 2013, Guinea-Bissau presented the objectives of the National Victim Assistance Strategy for the first time. The objectives included establishing a new coordination mechanism on victim assistance in the country, implementing a new national data collection system, strengthening current victim assistance programs, increasing mobilization of donor funds to such programs, and increasing employment levels of survivors in national and international organizations.[9]
Guinea-Bissau provided updates on its progress and challenges in assisting victims at the Fourth Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Lusaka in September 2013.[10] At the Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, Guinea-Bissau presented the objectives of its national victim assistance plan and appealed to the international community for technical and financial assistance for its implementation.[11]
Inclusion and participation in victim assistance
In 2013, mine/ERW survivors were included in the planning and provision of victim assistance through representative organizations such as the Persons with Disabilities’ Federation of Associations of Defense and Advocacy which represents 12 organizations of persons with disability, or the Persons with Disabilities’ Association for the Struggle for National Freedom.[12]
Service accessibility and effectiveness
Aside from the opening of a new rehabilitation center in the capital in 2011, there has been little progress overall in improving access and quality of assistance to survivors in Guinea-Bissau in recent years due to lack of funds and of government support. There were few facilities near mine-affected areas, emergency transportation was almost non-existent, and services were further hampered by a lack of communication mechanisms and roads/transport.[13]
In March 2011, the Center for Physical Rehabilitation (Centro de Reabilitação Motora, CRM) under the Ministry of Health was officially inaugurated in Bissau to serve as the main physical rehabilitation center for the country and to provide free rehabilitation services for survivors with economic need.[14] In 2013, the CRM was staffed by 34 personnel, including one Category Two Prosthetist/Orthotist and three bench technicians. In 2013, the CRM, in cooperation with the ICRC, the Federation of the Association of Persons with Disabilities, and other national organizations, began an outreach service to provide services for people living in rural areas.[15] The ICRC covered the costs for those mine/ERW survivors who accessed services, provided equipment and materials, and supported on-site technical training programs to improve the quality of the service.[16] Since opening in March 2011, the CRM has provided prosthetic and physiotherapy services to more than 600 people with disabilities, including the provision of prostheses to 21 mine/ERW survivors.[17]
Article 5 of the constitution of Guinea-Bissau prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities, but implementation was weak. There was no law mandating access to public buildings and no efforts were made to ensure access to buildings or streets.[18] Some mine survivors were eligible to receive pensions for persons with disabilities from the Ministry of Social Solidarity and Poverty Reduction (MSSPR).[19] Disabled former military personnel received pensions from the Ministry of Defense and Ex-Combatants, but these programs did not adequately address health, housing, or food needs.[20]
In September 2013, Guinea-Bissau signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; the Ministry of Social Solidarity is the focal point for the convention’s implementation.[21]
[1] The casualties were recorded by HUMAID, a demining organization, and provided to the Monitor via an email from Kennedy de Pina Araujo, Director, Center for Physical Rehabilitation (Centro de Reabilitação Motora, CRM), 14 March 2014.
[2] Monitor analysis of the statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013; and email from César de Carvalho, General Director, National Mine Action Coordination Center (Centro Nacional de Coordenação da Accão Anti-Minas, CAAMI), 12 March 2014.
[3] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Handicap International (HI), Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007). Annex 2, p. 145.
[6] Email from César de Carvalho, CAAMI, 12 March 2014; and statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[7] Email from César de Carvalho, CAAMI, 1 April 2014.
[8] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Convention on Cluster Munitions Fourth Meeting of States Parties, Lusaka, 10 September 2013.
[11] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2013.
[12] Email from Kennedy de Pina Araujo, CRM, 14 March 2014.
[13] Ibid; and ICRC “Physical Rehabilitation Programme: Annual Report 2011,” Geneva, June 2012.
[14] Emails from César de Carvalho, CAAMI, 3 August 2012, and 1 April 2014.
[15] Email from Kennedy de Pina Araujo, CRM, 14 March 2014; and statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2012.
[16] Email from Kennedy de Pina Araujo, CRM, 2 March 2013; and ICRC Physical Rehabilitation Project, “Annual Report 2013,” Geneva, 2014.
[17] Ibid.
[18] Statement of Guinea-Bissau, Mine Ban Treaty Twelfth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 4 December 2012.
[19] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for the period 30 April 2010 to 30 April 2011), Form J.
[20] United States Department of State, “2012 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Guinea-Bissau,” Washington, DC, 19 April 2013.
[21] Email from César de Carvalho, CAAMI, 12 March 2014.
Support for Mine Action
In 2012, the Republic of Guinea-Bissau declared it had completed its Article 5 Mine Ban Treaty mine clearance obligations.[1] Norway contributed NOK1,000,000 (US$171,877) to Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) for final survey and clearance.[2]
Summary of contributions: 2008–2012[3]
Year |
International contributions ($) |
2012 |
171,877 |
2011 |
2,431,891 |
2010 |
1,661,693 |
2009 |
2,068,000 |
2008 |
1,694,882 |
Total |
8,028,343 |
[1] ICBL, “ICBL Statement on updates by States Parties that have completed implementation of Article 5 since the 11MSP,” 21 May 2012.
[2] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 April 2013. Average exchange rate for 2012: NOK5.8181=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.
[3] See Landmine Monitor reports 2008–2011; and ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Guinea Bissau: Support for Mine Action,” 10 September 2012.