Israel

Last Updated: 28 November 2013

Mine Ban Policy

Mine ban policy overview

Mine Ban Treaty status

State not party

Pro-mine ban UNGA voting record

Abstained from voting on Resolution 67/32 in December 2012

Participation in Mine Ban Treaty meetings

Did not attend the Twelfth Meeting of States Parties in Geneva in December 2012 or intersessional meetings in May 2013

Policy

The State of Israel has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Israel did not make any statements on the Mine Ban Treaty in 2012 or the first half of 2013.

In November 2010, Israel reiterated its long-standing position that “regional circumstances prevailing in the Middle East prevent Israel from committing to a total ban on anti-personnel mines. Unfortunately, these regional conditions have not improved in recent years.”[1] Israel has said that “it is unable to disregard its specific military and security needs” and that “it cannot commit to a total ban on anti-personnel mines as they are a legitimate means for defending its borders against possible incursions such as terrorist attacks.”[2]

On 28 March 2011, Israel’s parliament (the Knesset) unanimously adopted the Mine Field Clearance Act. The law establishes a national mine action authority to manage the clearance of Israel’s “non-operational” minefields, but it does not refer to the Mine Ban Treaty or address the use, production, transfer, or stockpiling of antipersonnel mines.[3]

Israel did not attend any Mine Ban Treaty meetings in 2012 or the first half of 2013. It last attended a formal meeting of the Mine Ban Treaty in November–December 2004, when it participated as an observer in the First Review Conference in Nairobi.

On 3 December 2012, Israel abstained from voting on UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 67/32 calling for universalization and full implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty, as it has done in previous years. It was one of only 19 nations to abstain.

Israel is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and its Amended Protocol II on landmines. It submitted its annual national report for Amended Protocol II on 1 July 2013, as required under Article 13. Israel is not party to CCW Protocol V on explosive remnants of war.

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

Israel has said it “ceased all production and imports of antipersonnel mines in the early 1980s.”[4] It has dismantled its antipersonnel mine production lines.[5]

Israel declared a moratorium on the transfer of all antipersonnel mines in 1994 that was extended for three-year periods in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008, and 2011. The current moratorium is effective until July 2014. According to Israel, the moratorium was declared in recognition of the “grave humanitarian consequences” associated with antipersonnel mines and “the need, in this respect, for self imposed state restraint.”[6]

On 31 December 2007, the Defense Export Control Act entered into force in Israel. The act “criminalizes, inter alia, any violation of the export without an export license or contrary to its provisions. This Act serves as Israel’s statutory framework for the implementation of its obligations under the CCW regarding restrictions and prohibitions on transfer and the Moratorium on any sales of [antipersonnel mines].”[7]

The size and composition of Israel’s stockpile of antipersonnel mines remains unknown, but it includes both hand-laid and remotely-delivered mines.[8]

Use

The NGO Mine-Free Israel estimates that there are approximately one million operational and non-operational mines laid in minefields covering more than 197,000 dunams (197 km2) in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.[9]

In August 2011, Bamachaneh, the journal of the Israel Defense Force (IDF), reported that the IDF laid antipersonnel mines in the Golan Heights along the border with Syria.[10] The mines were laid after hundreds of civilians entered Israeli territory on 15 May 2011 during the annual Palestinian commemoration of “Nakba Day,” apparently crossing through minefields uninjured.[11]

The ICBL denounced the mine-laying as “shocking” and “disgraceful.”[12] The president of the Mine Ban Treaty’s Tenth Meeting of States Parties issued a statement expressing concern.[13]

In 2012, no new use of antipersonnel mines by the IDF was reported, but Israel stated that “extended monitoring, fences and markings of the minefields” was undertaken by the IDF’s engineering corps.[14]

 



[1] Letter from Eyal Propper, Director of Arms Control Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 14 November 2010.

[2] Email from Joshua Zarka, Counselor for Strategic Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 18 April 2007. Israel made a similar statement at the UN First Committee meetings in October 2011, stating “as long as the regional security situation continues to impose a threat on Israel’s safety and sovereignty, the need to protect the Israeli borders – including through the use of AP [antipersonnel] mines – cannot [be] diminished.” See statement of Israel, UNGA First Committee, New York, 4 October 2011.

[3] Mine Field Clearance Act, 5771-2011, 14 March 2011.

[4] Email from Meir Itzchaki, Regional Security and Arms Control Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 February 2003. In the past, Israel produced low metal content blast antipersonnel mines (No. 4, No. 10), a bounding fragmentation mine (No. 12), and Claymore-type directional fragmentation munitions, designated M18A1.

[5] Interview with members of the Israeli delegation to the Eighth Session of the CCW Group of Government Experts, Geneva, 8 July 2004.

[7] Ibid., Form D, November 2007.

[8] Israel reported that in 2005 the IDF destroyed 15,510 outdated mines at an ammunition disposal facility. It has not reported any further destruction of mines since that time. CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form C, 22 November 2005.

[9] Rebecca Anna Stoil, “Knesset paves way for landmine clearance effort,” Jerusalem Post, 14 March 2011, www.jpost.com/National-News/Knesset-paves-way-for-landmine-clearance-effort.

[10] The mines were laid openly and in daylight by Combat Engineering Corps officer cadets; they were placed beyond the border security fence but within the “Alpha Line” that marks the border with Syria. Gil Ronen, “Antipersonnel Mines Laid Along Syria Border ‘for September,’” Arutz Sheva (Israel News), 11 August 2011, www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/146650#.UlJ9SihQpAQ.

[11] According to IDF Maj. Ariel Ilouz, “Because of age, rain and other natural hazards the antipersonnel mines that were laid along the border were full of mud…. They were simply stuck. These mines have been are as [sic] old as 35–36 years and have not been touched.” Or Butbul and Reut Farkash, “Operation Mine,” www.idf.il.

[12] The ICBL described Israel’s use of antipersonnel mines to prevent border crossings as “unlawful as it is an unnecessary and disproportionate use of lethal force.” ICBL Press release, “Nobel Peace Prize-winning global campaign strongly condemns Israel’s new use of landmines,” 16 August 2011.

[13] Antipersonnel Mine Ban Convention Implementation Support Unit Press release, “President of Convention Banning Anti-Personnel Mines Expresses Concern About New Use of Mines by Israel,” Geneva, 6 September 2011, www.apminebanconvention.org/press-room/press-release-archives/archives-2011/.


Last Updated: 12 August 2014

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

Policy

The State of Israel has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

Israel has not publicly articulated its views on joining the ban convention in recent years. In November 2011, it said that “instruments” on cluster munitions “may be more expansive, but nevertheless do not enjoy the support of many relevant states” a reference to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[1]

In 2009, Israel stated that it “shares the views of those states wishing to alleviate the humanitarian concerns that may be associated with the use of cluster munitions,” but said it “believes that this could be best achieved within the framework of the CCW [Convention on Conventional Weapons],” to which it is a party.[2] Israel is not known to have reevaluated its position since the 2011 failure of the CCW to agree on a draft protocol on cluster munitions, leaving the Convention on Cluster Munitions as the sole multilateral instrument on the weapon.[3]

Israel did not participate in the diplomatic Oslo Process that created the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[4] From 2000, when the CCW first began discussing cluster munitions, until mid-2008, Israel opposed any new rules or regulations for states on the use of cluster munitions, insisting that existing international law was sufficient. In justifying its use of cluster munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006, Israel stressed that it did so in conformity with international humanitarian law. It said, “Both international law and accepted practice do not prohibit the use of…‘cluster bombs.’ Consequently, the main issue…should be the method of their use, rather than their legality.”[5]

Israel has never attended any meetings of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, even as an observer as other states not party have done.

Israel voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 68/182 condemning the Syrian government’s use of cluster munitions, on 18 December 2013.[6]

Israel is not party to the Mine Ban Treaty.

Use

Israel used cluster munitions in 2006 in south Lebanon against Hezbollah, in 1982 in Lebanon against Syrian forces and non-state armed groups (NSAG), in 1978 in south Lebanon, and in 1973 in Syria against NSAG training camps near Damascus.[7]

In January 2008, the Winograd Commission of inquiry appointed by the Israeli government to investigate the 2006 conflict reported that there was a lack of clarity regarding the acceptable or appropriate use of cluster munitions.[8] In October 2012, a senior Israeli military officer briefing foreign journalists on condition of anonymity reportedly stated that in any future war with Hezbollah, Israel’s cluster munition use would be “much reduced, significantly reduced,” compared to its previous use of the weapons during the 2006 conflict. According to the official, “Due to a whole range of considerations—legitimacy, our non-indifference to the treaty, effectiveness and other factors—cluster use is expected to be reduced in combat in the rural areas.”[9]

Production, transfer, and stockpiling

Israel has been a major producer and exporter of cluster munitions, primarily artillery projectiles and rockets containing the M85 dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) submunition equipped with a back-up pyrotechnic self-destruct fuze. Israel Military Industries (IMI) produces, license-produces, and exports cluster munitions including artillery projectiles (105mm, 122mm, 130mm, 152mm, 155mm, 175mm, and 203mm), mortar bombs (120mm), and rockets (EXTRA, GRADLAR, and LAR-160).[10]

In 2004, a representative of the company claimed that IMI produced more than 60 million M85 DPICM submunitions.[11] Historically it has concluded licensing agreements for the M85 with Germany, India, Romania, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US).[12] Based on lot numbers and production markings, Austria, Germany, Norway, and the UK have declared stockpiling 155mm artillery projectiles containing M85 submunitions in their Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 reports submitted in 2011. Israel transferred four GRADLAR 122mm/160mm rocket launcher units to Georgia in 2007. Georgia has acknowledged using the launchers with 160mm Mk IV rockets, each containing 104 M85 DPICM submunitions, during its August 2008 conflict with Russia.[13] State Party Chile declared possessing 249 of these rockets.[14] The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has reported that Israel has exported the LAR-160 rocket system to Venezuela as well as more recent exports of the EXTRA surface-to-surface missile system to Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, but it is not known if ammunition containing submunitions were included in these deals.[15]

Israel has also produced several types of air-dropped cluster munitions. The Rafael Corporation is credited with producing the ATAP-300, ATAP-500, ATAP-1000 RAM, TAL-1, and TAL-2 cluster bombs, as well as the BARAD Helicopter Submunition Dispenser.[16] In August 2011, Venezuela announced the “recent” destruction of Israeli-made AS TAL-1 cluster bombs belonging to its air force.[17] An air-dropped anti-runway cluster bomb called ARC-32 of Israeli origin has been reported in the stockpiles of Colombia.[18]

Israel has imported cluster munitions from the US, including M26 rockets (each with 644 submunitions) for its multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) launchers and 155mm M483A1 projectiles (each with 88 submunitions), both used in south Lebanon in 2006. The US has also supplied Rockeye cluster bombs (with 247 bomblets each) and CBU-58B cluster bombs (with 650 bomblets each).[19]

The size and composition of Israel’s current stockpile of cluster munitions is not known. Additionally, it captured and possesses Grad 122mm surface-to-surface rocket launchers, but it is not known if the ammunition for these weapons includes versions with submunition payloads.[20]

Israel also hosts a stockpile of US ammunition, which could be transferred to Israel in an emergency.[21] That cluster munitions were part of this stockpile was disclosed in a US Department of State cable in September 2011 released by Wikileaks that contained the claim that in 2008, US-manufactured cluster munitions with more than a one-percent tested failure rate “constitute greater than 60 percent of the overall” holdings of cluster munitions in the “pre-positioned War Reserve Stockpiles in Israel (WRSA/I).”[22] The Israeli officials reportedly warned the US that “unless the prohibition is lifted, Israel will have to revise its defensive doctrine, find a solution to the one-percent dud rate requirement for cluster munitions, and look to another type of weapon system on which to center its self defense strategy.”[23]

 



[1] Statement of Israel, Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 14 November 2011.

[2] Letter from Rodica Radian-Gordon, Director, Arms Control Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to Human Rights Watch (HRW), 23 February 2009. In June 2011, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the views it expressed in a 2009 letter to the Monitor remain unchanged. Letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 19 June 2011.

[3] Statement of Israel, CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 25 November 2011. Notes by Action on Armed Violence.

[4] For details on Israel’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see HRW and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 212–215.

[5] Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Behind the Headlines: Legal and operational aspects of the use of cluster bombs,” 5 September 2006.

[6] The resolution expressed “outrage” at Syria’s “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights…including those involving the use of…cluster munitions.” “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution 68/182, 18 December 2013. Israel voted in favor of a similar resolution on 15 May 2013.

[7] During the 1978 and 1982 Lebanon conflicts, the United States (US) placed restrictions on the use of its cluster munitions by Israel. In response to Israel’s use of cluster munitions in 1982 and the civilian casualties that they caused, the US issued a moratorium on the transfer of cluster munitions to Israel. The moratorium was lifted in 1988. HRW, “Flooding South Lebanon: Israel’s Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006,” Vol. 20, No. 2(E), February 2008, p. 26.

[8] Landmine Action, “Cluster Munitions: A survey of legal responses,” 2008, pp. 18–26. According to a United States (US) Department of State cable dated 7 May 2008 and made public in September 2011, Israeli Defense Force (IDF) lawyers informed the US that “Winograd Report recommendations concerning cluster munitions were being implemented.” According to the cable, “Since the summer of 2006, the IDF has improved command and control over cluster munitions, improved the documentation system utilized by firing level units, revised its training program to ensure widespread familiarization of the requirements for using cluster munitions, and placed a greater emphasis on accountability.” See “Cluster munitions: Israeli’s operational defensive capabilities crisis,” US Department of State cable 08TELAVIV1012 dated 7 May 2008, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.

[9] When asked to clarify the definition of “rural areas,” the official stated that he meant “most of southern Lebanon.” Dan Williams, “Israel to limit cluster bombs in possible war with Hezbollah,” Reuters (Tel Aviv), 29 October 2012.

[10] Information on surface-launched cluster munitions produced and possessed by Israel is taken primarily from IMI’s corporate website. It has been supplemented with information from Leland S. Ness and Anthony G. Williams, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2007–2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2007) and US Defense Intelligence Agency, “Improved Conventional Munitions and Selected Controlled-Fragmentation Munitions (Current and Projected) DST-1160S-020-90.”

[11] Mike Hiebel, Alliant TechSystems, and Ilan Glickman, IMI, “Self Destruct Fuze for M864 Projectiles / MLRS Rockets,” Presentation to the 48th Annual Fuze Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, 27–28 April 2004, Slide 9.

[12] HRW, “Flooding South Lebanon: Israel’s Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006,” Vol. 20, No. 2(E), February 2008, p. 27.

[13] The transfer of the GRADLAR launchers was reported in UN Register of Conventional Arms, Submission of Georgia, UN Register of Conventional Arms Report for Calendar Year 2007, 7 July 2008. The Georgian Ministry of Defense on 1 September 2008 admitted to using Mk IV rockets against Russian forces on its website. “Georgian Ministry of Defence’s Response to the Human Rights Watch Inquire [sic] about the Usage of M85 Bomblets.”.

[14] Chile, Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Forms B and C, September 2012.

[15] Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, “Arms Transfers Database,” Recipient report for Israel for the period 1950–2011, generated on 6 June 2012.

[16] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), pp. 370–380.

[17]The Ministry of Defense of Venezuela destroys cluster bombs” (“El Ministerio de la Defensa de Venezuela destruye bombas de racimo”), Infodefensa.com, 26 August 2011.

[18] Presentation on cluster munitions of the Ministry of Defense of Colombia, Bogotá, December 2010.

[19] HRW, “Flooding South Lebanon: Israel’s Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006,” Vol. 20, No. 2(E), February 2008, pp. 27–28.

[20] International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2011 (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 313; and Colin King, ed., Jane’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal 2007–2008, CD-edition, 15 January 2008 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2008).

[21] “The [Department of Defense] maintains a [war-reserve stockpile] in Israel. This is a separate stockpile of US-owned munitions and equipment set aside, reserved, or intended for use as war reserve stocks by the US and which may be transferred to the Government of Israel in an emergency, subject to reimbursement.” Legislative Proposals contained in a letter by the General Counsel of the Department of Defense to the chairs of the Congressional Armed Services Committees, 11 March 2004.

[22] According to the cable, until the munitions are transferred from the War Reserve Stockpiles for use by Israel in wartime, “they are considered to be under U.S. title, and U.S. legislation now prevents such a transfer of any cluster munitions with less than a one percent failure rate.” The cable described the inaugural meeting on 1 May 2008 of the “U.S.-Israeli Cluster Munitions Working Group (CMWG).” In this meeting, “Israeli MOD [Ministry of Defense], IDF and MFA [Ministry of Foreign Affairs] officials warned that the current U.S. legislative prohibition on exporting cluster munitions” with more than a one-percent tested failure rate “seriously degrades Israel’s operational capabilities to defend itself.” “Cluster munitions: Israeli’s operational defensive capabilities crisis,” US Department of State cable 08TELAVIV1012 dated 7 May 2008, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.

[23]Cluster munitions: Israeli’s operational defensive capabilities crisis,” US Department of State cable 08TELAVIV1012 dated 7 May 2008, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.


Last Updated: 01 September 2014

Mine Action

Contamination and Impact

The State of Israel is affected by landmines dating back to World War II and by mines that Israel later laid along its borders, near military camps and training areas, and near civilian infrastructure. The exact extent of overall contamination is not known.

The total area “not essential to Israel’s security” affected by mines is estimated at 128km2.[1] This includes “minefields in the sea”—areas in the Dead Sea—estimated to cover 0.5km2.[2] From the results of mine clearance projects, actual contamination is thought likely to cover between 5% and 10% less than this. In August 2011, Israel’s military reported planting new mines to reinforce minefields and other defenses along its de facto border with Syria in the Golan Heights.[3]

Mine Action Program

Israel’s parliament enacted a law on minefield clearance in March 2011 establishing the Israeli National Mine Action Authority (INMAA) to undertake a “comprehensive program of mines clearing projects inside Israel.”[4] The act said its aim was “to create a normative infrastructure for the clearance of minefields that are not essential to national security, and to declare them as free from landmines with the highest degree of safety to civilians, in accordance with the international obligations of the State of Israel, and within the shortest period of time possible.”[5]

INMAA was established in the Ministry of Defense with ministry staff responsible for planning mine action, while commercial companies were hired to conduct clearance using a separate supervising company to conduct quality assurance. INMAA also sets national standards “taking into consideration the procedures of the Israel Defense Forces [IDF] that will be as compatible as possible with the International Mine Action Standards.”[6] The IDF also conducts mine clearance according to “its own mine action plans that are executed by their military methods and techniques” and implements an annual program that includes maintenance of protection of minefields and suspected areas.[7]

Strategic Planning

Israel reports that INMAA has a multi-year clearance plan for 2014−17 that calls for clearance of areas in the Golan Heights and Galilee in the summer and in the Jordan Valley and Arava Plain in the winter, but gave no details. It said demining operations clear on average 1.5−2km2 a year. Israel said INMAA would also manage projects in the West Bank that are funded by donations.[8]

Land Release

Israel released 2.2km2 through clearance by commercial operators contracted by INMAA in 2013, bringing the total area cleared in the last two years to 3.3km2.[9] The amount of land cleared or released by the IDF is unknown.

Clearance in 2013 (see Table 1) was split between northern and southern Israel. Eitan Lidor Projects cleared tasks in Majdal Shams and Had Nes in the Golan Heights, the north central area of Valley of Springs and around Eilat, and the Arava desert in the south. Israeli Mine Action Group (IMAG) cleared a little over 1km2 in the vicinity of Sapir in the south. Quadro Mine Clearance undertook a small project on behalf of Roots of Peace at the village of Husan on the West Bank.[10]

Table 1. Mine clearance in 2013[11]

Operator

Mined areas released

Area cleared (m2)

Antipersonnel mines destroyed

Antivehicle mines destroyed

IMAG

8

1,040,000

13,000

2

Eilat Lidor Projects

27

1,150,000

21,000

120

Quadro

1

7,000

6

0

Total

36

2,197,000

34,006

122

INMAA identified four clearance projects to be undertaken in 2014, including in the Arava Plain (0.8km2), the Valley of Springs (1.1km2), Upper Galilee (0.7km2), and in the West Bank (67,000m2).[12]

Support for Mine Action

INMAA has an annual budget of NIS27 million (approximately US$7.7 million) for mine action.

 



[1] Email from Eran Yuvan, Deputy Director, Arms Control Policy Department, Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 29 April 2014.

[2] Ibid., 6 May 2012.

[3]Israel army plants new mines along Syria border,” Associated Press, 13 August 2011.

[4] Minefield Clearance Law 5771-2011 of March 2011. See Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form A, April 2011. Form A refers to details provided in Form D, but information in Form D has been deleted.

[5] Minefield Clearance Act 2011, unofficial translation.

[6] Emails from Michael Heiman, Director of Technology and Knowledge Management, INMAA, and Eran Yuvan, Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 6 May 2012.

[7] Email from Eran Yuvan, Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 29 April 2014; CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form B, July 2013.

[8] Email from Eran Yuvan, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel, 29 April 2014.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.; Israeli Consulate General, San Francisco, “A Bay Area organization is helping to clear landmines from Israel,” 16 July 2013.

[11] Email from Eran Yuvan, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 20 May 2014.

[12] Ibid., 29 April 2014.


Last Updated: 29 October 2014

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties

Casualties Overview

All known casualties by end 2013

13 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties

Casualties in 2013

2 (2012: 0)

2013 casualties by outcome

1 killed; 1 injured (2012: 0)

2013 casualties by item type

1 antivehicle mine; 1 antipersonnel mine

In 2013, the Monitor identified two new mine/ERW casualties in the State of Israel. One soldier was killed in an accident during in a demining training course in the Golan Heights[1] and one civilian was injured when he stepped on a mine in an abandoned building in the Jordan Valley.[2]

In addition, in 2013 four Israeli soldiers were reportedly wounded in a landmine explosion while in Lebanon.[3]

From 1999 to the end of 2013, the Monitor recorded 13 mine/ERW casualties in Israel.[4]

Cluster munition strikes in 2006 caused 13 casualties in Israel.[5] No further casualties from cluster munition remnants have been identified.

Victim Assistance

The total number of mine/ERW survivors in Israel is not known. Mine/ERW survivors are not treated differently from other persons with disabilities. The Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services is responsible for disability issues.[6] “Victims of hostile activities,” including mine survivors, are entitled to benefits, rehabilitation, and grants under the Benefits for Victims of Hostilities Law of 1970.[7]

 



[2]Hiker loses foot after stepping on mine in Jordan Valley,” Times of Israel, 30 October 2013.

[3]Israeli soldiers wounded in Lebanon incursion,” Aljazeera, 7 August 2013.

[4] See previous Monitor country profiles for Israel on the Monitor website.

[5] Handicap International, Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities, Brussels, May 2007, p. 115.

[7] National Insurance Institute of Israel, “Benefits for Victims of Hostilities,”, accessed 29 July 2014.