Mauritania
Mine Ban Policy
Mine Ban Policy
The Islamic Republic of Mauritania signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified on 21 July 2000, becoming a State Party on 1 January 2001. Mauritania adopted national legislation including penal sanctions to implement the Mine Ban Treaty on 2 January 2008.[1] A national commission was set up to be responsible for the mine issue and implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty in July 2002.[2]
Mauritania submitted its eleventh Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report on 30 April 2011, covering the period from 30 April 2010 to 30 April 2011.[3]
Mauritania attended the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2011.
Mauritania is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Production, transfer, stockpile destruction, and retention
Mauritania has always reported that it has never manufactured antipersonnel mines. It is not known to have exported mines. Mauritania completed the destruction of its stockpile of 21,168 antipersonnel mines on 5 December 2004, ahead of its deadline of 1 January 2005.[4]
Mauritania initially intended to retain 5,728 mines for training purposes, but decided in 2004 to reduce the number to 728: 100 PMN mines, 161 Model 51 mines, and 467 MP mines. In 2011, Mauritania reported the same number retained for training.[5] No mines were consumed (destroyed) in training activities from 2005 to 2011.
In 2009, Mauritania stated that it was looking at the possibility of gradually destroying the retained mines starting in 2010.[6] With respect to mines retained, in April 2007 Mauritania said that it agreed with the ICBL and others that the number of mines retained for training and development purposes should at most be in the hundreds or thousands.[7]
[1] Law No. 2008-06 Relative to the Prohibition of Antipersonnel Mines in Mauritania, 2 January 2008. The legislation bans the acquisition, manufacture, stockpiling, transfer, import, export, and use of antipersonnel mines. It provides penalties of one to three years’ imprisonment and fines of MRO100,000 to 1 million ($442 to 4,417) for violations. The law permits retention of mines for training and development, and sets conditions for implementing Article 8 of the Mine Ban Treaty on compliance.
[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, 25 April 2005.
[3] Previous Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reports were submitted on 2010, and on 30 April 2009, 24 April 2008, 20 April 2007, 26 April 2006, 25 April 2005, 18 June 2004, 30 April 2003, 12 June 2002, and 20 June 2001.
[4] It destroyed 16,168 French-made APID 51 mines in 2001 and 2002, and destroyed the final 5,000 antipersonnel mines on 5 December 2004, including 1,738 Soviet PMN mines, 1,728 French Model 51 mines, and 1,533 “MP” mines, which are most likely Yugoslav PMA-3 mines. The quantities provided for each type of mine total 4,999, not 5,000. See Landmine Monitor Report 2005, pp. 422–423.
[5] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms B and D, 30 April 2011.
[6] Statement of Mauritania, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 25 May 2009. Notes by the Monitor.
[7] Statement of Mauritania, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 27 April 2007. Notes by the Monitor. In May 2006, Mauritania called on other States Parties to reduce the number of mines retained as much as possible. Statement of Mauritania, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Mine Ban Treaty, Geneva, 12 May 2006. Notes by the Monitor.
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Policy
The Islamic Republic of Mauritania signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 19 April 2010, ratified on 1 February 2012, and the convention entered into force for the country on 1 August 2012.
Mauritania has declared its ratification legislation, Law 2011-050, under national implementation measures.[1] In April 2014, a government official said that international treaties ratified by Mauritania are automatically incorporated into the domestic law so there is no need for new or amended legislation specific to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[2]
Mauritania provided its initial Article 7 transparency report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions in March 2013 and an updated annual report in April 2014.[3]
Mauritania was an active participant in the Oslo Process that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2008 and made many strong contributions towards ensuring the most comprehensive treaty possible.[4] Mauritania did not sign the convention in December 2008, apparently due to political uncertainty, but signed at the UN in New York in April 2010.
Mauritania has continued to actively engage in the work of the Convention on Cluster Munitions. It has participated in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention, including the Fourth Meeting of States Parties held in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013. Mauritania has participated in all the intersessional meetings of the convention in Geneva, including those held in April 2014. Mauritania also attended an African regional meeting on the convention’s universalization in Lomé, Togo in May 2013.
Mauritania voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 68/182 on 18 December 2013, which expressed “outrage” at the Syrian government’s “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights” including the use of cluster munitions.[5]
Mauritania has yet to formally make its views known on certain important issues for the interpretation and implementation of the convention, including the prohibition on transit, the prohibition on foreign stockpiling, or the prohibition on investment in cluster munition production. During the negotiation of the convention in Dublin in May 2008, Mauritania called for clarity of language to ensure that the prohibition on assistance with prohibited acts would still be fully applicable during joint military operations with states not party.[6]
Mauritania is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is not party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Use, production, transfer, and stockpiling
Mauritania has stated that it has never used, produced, imported, or exported cluster munitions and does not have a stockpile of the weapons.[7]
[1] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, (for the period 12 January 2012 to 31 December 2012), 18 March 2013.
[2] CMC meetings with Lt.-Col. Alioune Ould Mohamed El Hacen, National Coordinator, National Humanitarian Demining Programme for Development (PNDHD), Ministry of Interior and Decentralisation, Geneva, 8 and 15 April 2014.
[3] The initial report covers calendar year 2012, while the update provided in April 2014 covers calendar year 2013.
[4] See ICBL, Cluster Munition Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada: October 2010), pp. 163–164.
[5] “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/RES/68/182, 18 December 2013.
[6] For Article 21 on relations with states not party, Mauritania proposed to delete the phrase “notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1” (Article 1 prohibits assistance with banned acts). Statements of Mauritania, Dublin Diplomatic Conference on Cluster Munitions, 20 May 2008, 23 May 2008, and 27 May 2008. Notes by Landmine Action.
[7] Forms B, C, D, and E of Mauritania’s Article 7 reports were not completed and the cover sheet lists them as “sans objet” or not applicable. Mauritania has stated that it does not stockpile cluster munitions. Interview with Lt.-Col. Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, PNDHD, Ministry of Interior and Decentralisation, Vientiane, 10 November 2010; email, 4 April 2011; and Monitor meeting, Geneva, 15 April 2013.
Mine Action
Contamination and Impact
Overall Mine Action Performance: GOOD[1]
Performance Indicator |
Score |
Problem understood |
8 |
Target date for completion of clearance |
8 |
Targeted clearance |
8 |
Efficient clearance |
8 |
National funding of program |
6 |
Timely clearance |
7 |
Land release system |
8 |
National mine action standards |
7 |
Reporting on progress |
5 |
Improving performance |
7 |
MINE ACTION PERFORMANCE SCORE |
7.2 |
The northern region of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania is affected by mines and other ordnance primarily as a result of the conflict over Western Sahara in 1975–1978. A 2006 Landmine Impact Survey (LIS) found a total of 65 suspected hazardous areas (SHAs) covering 76km2 and affecting 60 communities. In March 2010, Morocco provided detailed maps of minefields laid during the Western Sahara conflict. The minefields were cleared using military standards prior to entry into force of the Mine Ban Treaty.[2] Based on information collected during the LIS and provided by Morocco, as well as results of land release activities conducted by Mauritania, it was estimated in September 2010 that 64km2 across 20 SHAs remained to be addressed.[3]
In 2013, clearance was completed in two of the three contaminated provinces, Tiris Zemour and Adrar. According to Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), an initial non-technical survey (NTS) of the province of Nouadhibou in December 2013 identified just over 8km2 requiring technical survey (TS) and clearance.[4] NPA informed the Monitor that the majority of the hazardous areas identified during the survey are located near the border with Western Sahara and might be considered as outside of Mauritanian territory and thus not under its jurisdiction.[5]
As of the beginning of May 2014, following consultations between NPA and the National Humanitarian Demining Program for Development (Programme National de Déminage Humanitaire pour le Développement, PNDHD), it was estimated that 14 tasks, in five communities in Nouadhibou (Swaideyyat, Swasyat, Guerguera, Zafati, and Bouchoun), covering approximately 1.7km2 remained to be released.[6] There is also a need for clarity surrounding mined areas in Western Sahara that may fall within Mauritania.
The impact of contamination is predominantly social and economic rather than humanitarian, blocking access to pasture and other community resources as well as occasionally killing livestock.[7] The last reported mine casualties were in 2010 when three people were injured.[8]
Mine Action Program
The PNDHD coordinates mine action operations in Mauritania.[9] Since August 2007, the program has been the responsibility of the Ministry of Interior and Decentralization, with oversight from an interministerial Steering Committee, set up by decree in September 2007. The PNDHD has its headquarters in the capital, Nouakchott, and a regional mine action center in Nouadhibou.[10]
In accordance with a 2006 decree, all clearance activities have been conducted by the Army Engineer Corps operating under the PNDHD. In March 2011, NPA signed an agreement with Mauritania to provide support for mine and battle area clearance in the country. NPA has been since working in Mauritania both as an operator and in a capacity-building role.[11] In June 2013, NPA trained two Army Engineer Corps clearance teams, which were then deployed to Nouadhibou province.[12]
In 2014, NPA was planning to reduce its operational role and focus more on its advisory work. Clearance capacity was provided by seconded Engineers Corps personnel working to complete clearance of contaminated areas in Nouadhibou province.[13] NPA and the PNDHD were also planning to develop the Engineers Corps’ capacity to respond to residual threats after completion of clearance operations.[14]
Strategic planning
Mauritania’s extension request included a detailed work plan for 2010–15 containing annual milestones of area to be released each year and against which progress could be compared. By the end of 2011, operations would be over in the localities of Tiris Zemour and Adrar. This was finally achieved in 2013.
In 2013, a total area of almost 14km2 covering four areas was due to be released.[15] In May 2013, at the Standing Committee meetings, Mauritania reported to States Parties that in fact some 23km2 would be released during the year—approximately 9km2 more than foreseen in its five-year work plan.[16]
Land Release
Survey in 2013
NPA reported that in December 2013, initial NTS of Nouadhibou province was completed in partnership with the PNDHD, identifying just over 8km2 requiring further survey and clearance.[17] However, as some of the areas identified during the NTS were considered to be located outside of Mauritania’s territory, this estimate was revised downwards following consultations between NPA and the PNDHD. As of May 2014, 1.7km2 remained to be released affecting five communities.[18]
Clearance in 2013
In 2013, NPA reported releasing 23 mined areas covering approximately 16km2, of which about 20% was released through TS and full clearance, destroying in the process 46 antipersonnel mines and 48 antivehicle mines.[19] In contrast, Mauritania reported that in total 19.9km2 were released in 2013 through NTS, almost 0.6km2 through TS, and nearly 2.6km2 during clearance operations. According to the PNDHD, 91 antipersonnel mines and 47 antivehicle mines were destroyed during the process.[20] Different figures were provided by NPA, which managed all the demining teams.[21]
Land release in 2013[22]
Operators |
Canceled by NTS (m2) |
Released by TS (m2) |
Cleared (m2) |
Antipersonnel mines destroyed |
Antivehicle mines destroyed |
NPA/Army Engineers Corps |
19,947,700 |
600,727 |
2,596,904 |
91 |
47 |
During 2013, four demining teams were operating in the provinces of Tiris Zemour and Adrar. Two additional teams were working in the Nouadhibou province from August to December 2013.[23]
Mine clearance results were slightly lower in 2013 than in 2012 due to a focus on clearance of cluster-munition-contaminated areas during 2013.[24]
Mine clearance in 2009–13 (km2)[25]
Year |
Mined area cleared (km2) |
2013 |
0.84 |
2012 |
1.05 |
2011 |
N/R |
2010 |
0.3 |
2009 |
0.2 |
Totals |
2.41 |
N/R = not reported
Article 5 Compliance
Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty (and in accordance with the five-year extension granted by States Parties in 2010), Mauritania is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 January 2016.
In its extension request, Mauritania explained that the reasons for its inability to meet its deadline were the following: lack of financial resources, insufficient progress in demining operations, use of only manual demining techniques, and difficult soil and climatic factors.[26] In presenting its extension request to the Standing Committee in June 2010, Mauritania stated that it had a “coherent plan” that combined land release by survey and clearance and that it hoped to involve international NGOs in its demining program.[27] NPA has since established a mine action program.
In May 2013, Mauritania said it was fully committed to achieving the objectives of its extension, noting that only lack of funding could impede timely fulfilment of its work-plan.[28]
Support for Mine Action
In 2013, Germany and Norway contributed US$1.77 million for clearance operations. They both provided their support through NPA.[29]
Since 2009, Mauritania has contributed approximately US$4.3 million, equivalent to half of its total mine action budget. In 2013, it estimated its contribution at US$850,000, the same as the previous year.
Recommendations
· Mauritania should maintain its clearance efforts to be able to clear its last contaminated areas in Nouadhibou by 2016.
· To better assess its progress and evaluate what remains to be done, Mauritania should ensure data is systematically reported and accurately reflects results achieved on the ground.
· Mauritania should engage in discussions with relevant stakeholders regarding clearance of contaminated areas in Western Sahara and close to the Berm in the buffer zone.
[1] See “Mine Action Program Performance” for more information on performance indicators.
[2] Mine Ban Treaty Revised Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 6 September 2010, p. 3.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Melissa Andersson, Country Director, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), 18 March 2014.
[5] Emails from Melissa Andersson, NPA, 21 April 2014.
[6] Ibid., 7 May 2014.
[7] NPA, “Humanitarian Disarmament in Mauritania,” accessed 27 February 2014.
[8] Email from Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, Director, PNDHD, 17 April 2011.
[9] Decree No. 1960/MDAT/MDN establishing the PNDHD, 14 August 2007.
[10] Decree No. 001358/MDAT establishing the Steering Committee of the PNDHD, 3 September 2007.
[12] Melissa Andersson, “Demining graduation in Mauritania,” NPA, 28 June 2013.
[13] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Melissa Andersson, NPA, 18 March 2014.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Mine Ban Treaty Revised Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 6 September 2010, p. 19.
[16] Statement of Mauritania, Standing Committee on mine clearance, Geneva, 27 May 2013.
[17] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Melissa Andersson, NPA, 18 March 2014.
[18] Emails from Melissa Andersson, NPA, 7 May 2014, and Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, PNDHD, 12 May 2014.
[19] Emails from Melissa Andersson, NPA, 7 May 2014, and Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, PNDHD, 12 May 2014.
[20] Email from Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, PNDHD, 14 May 2014.
[21] In 2013, NPA reported that 13.1km2 were released through NTS, 2.1km2 through technical survey, and 0.84km2 during clearance operations, destroying 46 antipersonnel mines, 48 antivehicle mines, and 124 items of unexploded ordnance. Response to Monitor questionnaire by Melissa Andersson, NPA, 18 March 2014.
[22] Email from Alioune O. Mohamed El Hacen, PNDHD, 12 May 2014.
[23] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Melissa Andersson, NPA, 18 March 2014.
[24] Ibid.
[25] Mine Ban Treaty Revised Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 6 September 2010, p. 11; and NPA Annual Report 2012 to PNDHD, p. 3.
[26] Mine Ban Treaty Article 5 deadline Extension Request, 3 February 2010, pp. 3–4.
[27] Statement of Mauritania, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Geneva, 23 June 2010.
[28] Ibid, 27 May 2013. Notes by ICBL.
[29] Email from Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Section for Humanitarian Affairs, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 28 April 2014; and Germany Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form I, 4 May 2014.
Casualties and Victim Assistance
Casualties Overview
All known casualties by end 2013 |
58 (26 people killed; 30 injured; two of unknown status) |
Casualties in 2013 |
0 (2012: 4) |
2013 casualties by outcome |
0 (2012: 1 killed, 3 injured) |
In 2013, no new casualties were identified in the Islamic Republic of Mauritania.[1] In 2012, four casualties were recorded as the result of a single incident. One adult male was killed and three other people, including two children, were injured while collecting scrap metal in Zoueratt, in northern Mauritania.
In 2010, the Monitor recorded three casualties, two from hand grenades and a third (a boy) injured by an antipersonnel landmine. All three incidents occurred close to the border with Western Sahara.[2]
Since 1999, the Monitor has identified 58 mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties in Mauritania (26 people killed; 30 injured; two of unknown status).[3]
[1] Monitor analysis of media report for 2013 (from 1 January to 31 December); email from Lt.-Col. Alioune ould Mohamed El Hacen, Coordinator, National Humanitarian Demining Programme for Development (Programme National de Déminage Humanitaire pour le Développement, PNDHD).
[2] Email from Lt.-Col. El Hacen, Coordinator, PNDHD, Ministry of Interior and Decentralization, 17 April 2011; and see ICBL, Landmine Monitor 2010: Country Profile: Western Sahara, 21 June 2010.
[3] The PNDHD recorded at least 42 mine/ERW casualties (20 killed; 20 injured; two of unknown status) between 2001 (the earliest date for reliable data) and 2008. The Monitor recorded four killed and two injured in 1999–2000, as well as one killed and five injured in 2009–2010.
Support for Mine Action
Since 2008, the Islamic Republic of Mauritania has contributed approximately US$4.3 million or 58% of its total mine action budget. In 2012, it contributed $850,000.[1]
In 2012, France, Germany, Japan, Norway, and Spain contributed $1,394,978 for clearance operations and risk education. Germany and Norway provided their support through Norwegian People’s Aid, and Japan and Spain made their contributions through the UN Voluntary Trust Fund for Assistance in Mine Action.[2]
International contributions: 2012[3]
Donor |
Sector |
Amount |
Amount ($) |
Norway |
Clearance |
NOK5,000,000 |
859,387 |
Japan |
Clearance |
¥15,759,980 |
197,444 |
Germany |
Clearance |
€125,000 |
160,738 |
Spain |
Clearance |
€90,000 |
115,731 |
France |
Risk education |
€47,965 |
61,678 |
Total |
|
|
1,394,978 |
Summary of contributions: 2008–2012[4]
Year |
National contributions ($) |
International contributions ($) |
Total contributions |
2012 |
850,000 |
1,394,978 |
2,244,978 |
2011 |
985,000 |
807,158 |
1,792,158 |
2010 |
846,000 |
194,990 |
1,040,990 |
2009 |
846,000 |
257,366 |
1,103,366 |
2008 |
800,000 |
427,631 |
1,227,631 |
Total |
4,327,000 |
3,082,123 |
7,409,123 |
[1] Presentation by Alioune ould Mohamed El Hacen, Coordinator, National Humanitarian Demining Programme for Development, in Addis Ababa, at African Union/ICRC workshop on weapon contamination in Africa, 5 March 2013.
[2] France, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form I, 30 April 2013; Germany, Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), Amended Protocol II, Form B, 23 March 2013; Japan, CCW, Amended Protocol II, 3 April 2013; response to Monitor questionnaire by Ingunn Vatne, Senior Advisor, Department for Human Rights, Democracy and Humanitarian Assistance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 11 April 2013; Spain, CCW, Protocol V, Form F, April 2013; and UNMAS, “UNMAS Annual Report 2012,” p. 39.
[3] Average exchange rate for 2012: €1=US$1.2859; ¥79.82=US$1; NOK5.8181=US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2013.
[4] ICBL-CMC, “Country Profile: Mauritania: Support for Mine Action,” 10 September 2012.