Montenegro
Mine Ban Policy
Mine Ban Policy
Montenegro deposited its instrument of succession to the Mine Ban Treaty on 23 October 2006, becoming a State Party on 1 April 2007.[1] Montenegro has not enacted new legislation to implement the Mine Ban Treaty, but instead relies on existing laws. Montenegro’s Article 7 reports have all declared that the requirements of Article 9 (national implementation measures) have been fully implemented.[2]
In 2011, Montenegro submitted its fifth Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report, covering calendar year 2010.[3]
Montenegro attended the Tenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Geneva in November–December 2010, as well as intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2011.
Montenegro is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons, but has not ratified Amended Protocol II on landmines and Protocol V on explosive remnants of war.
Use, production, transfer, stockpiling, and destruction
In 2007, Montenegro reaffirmed earlier reports that the former state of Serbia and Montenegro did not produce any type of landmine after 1990.[4] Montenegro has also confirmed that there are no facilities for mine production on its territory.[5] In the past, the former Serbia and Montenegro stated several times that mine exports halted in 1990.[6]
On 16 May 2007, Montenegro and Serbia completed the destruction of the last of their stockpiled antipersonnel mines in advance of their respective deadlines of 1 April 2011 and 1 March 2008.[7] In total, Montenegro transferred 199,387 mines to Serbia for destruction, including approximately 40,000 after independence.[8]
Montenegro has not retained any mines for training purposes.[9]
[1] On 3 June 2006, Montenegro ended its union with Serbia and became independent. It was accepted as a member of the UN on 28 June 2006. The former state of Serbia and Montenegro had acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty in September 2003.
[2] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports, Form A, October 2007, 2008 (for calendar year 2007), and 2009 (for calendar year 2008). The 2008 and 2009 reports include excerpts from the Criminal Code of Montenegro (2003 and 2004) on “use of forbidden means of combat” and the “manufacture of forbidden weapons,” citing relevant penal sanctions. The 2009 report also refers to Article 25 of the “Law on Army of Montenegro,” which states that the military must function in the framework of international law and that military personnel must be equipped in accordance with international conventions.
[3] Previous reports were submitted in 2010, in 2009, October 2007 and in 2008 (for calendar year 2007). The initial report consisted of a single page, with one or two sentences for each form, and the period covered was not specified.
[4] Interview with Vice-Admiral Dragan Samardzic, Deputy Chief of General Staff, Armed Forces of Montenegro, Podgorica, 15 March 2007; and see also Landmine Monitor Report 2006, p. 634.
[5] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form E, October 2007; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2007), Form E.
[6] Letter from Maj.-Gen. Dobrosav Radovanovic, Assistant Minister of Defense, Sector of International Military Cooperation and Defense Policy, Ministry of Defense, 29 January 2003; and see also Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 789.
[7] After its independence, Montenegro continued to participate in the stockpile destruction process initiated by the former Serbia and Montenegro in 2005 as a project of the Ministry of Defense and the NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA). For details, see Landmine Monitor Report 2007, pp. 522–523.
[8] Email from Graham Goodrum, Technical Officer, NAMSA, 25 June 2007. This included the following antipersonnel mines: 109,003 PMR-2; 42,081 PMA-3; 20,926 PMA-1; 20,448 PMA-2; 5,929 PROM-1; and 1,000 PMR-3. The mines came from army stockpiles in Danilovgrad, Nikšić, Opatovo, Petrovići, Podgorica, and Sasovići.
[9] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form D, October 2007; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2007), Form D.
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Commitment to the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Convention on Cluster Munitions status |
State Party |
National implementation legislation |
Has declared that existing legislation is adequate to enforce the convention |
Stockpile destruction |
Completed destruction in October 2010 |
Participation in Convention on Cluster Munitions meetings |
Attended Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013, intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2014, and a regional workshop in Croatia in April 2014 |
Key developments |
Provided annual transparency report in April 2014 |
Policy
The Republic of Montenegro signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 3 December 2008 and ratified on 25 January 2010. It was among the first 30 ratifications that triggered the convention’s entry into force on 1 August 2010.
Under national implementation measures, Montenegro has declared that its existing law is adequate to enforce the convention’s provisions.[1] According to Article 9 of the country’s constitution, international treaties ratified by Montenegro are an “integral part of the domestic legislation, and have supremacy over domestic legislation and are directly implemented when dealing with issues differently than domestic legislation.”[2]
Montenegro submitted its initial Article 7 transparency report for the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 27 January 2011 and provided annual updated reports in 2013 and on 16 April 2014.[3]
Montenegro participated actively in the Oslo Process that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[4] Since 2008, it has continued to engage in the work of the convention. Montenegro has participated in every Meeting of States Parties of the convention, including the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013. It has attended all of the convention’s intersessional meetings in Geneva, including in April 2014. Montenegro participated in a regional workshop on the Convention on Cluster Munitions and Mine Ban Treaty in Croatia in April 2014.[5]
Montenegro has voted in favor of UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions condemning the Syrian government’s cluster munition use, including Resolution 68/182 on 18 December 2013, which expressed “outrage” at Syria’s “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights…including those involving the use of…cluster munitions.”[6]
Interpretive issues
Montenegro has expressed its views on a number of important issues relating to the interpretation and implementation of the convention. On the prohibition on assistance with prohibited acts in joint military operations with states not party, Montenegro has elaborated its understanding that “the participation in the planning or conducting of operations, exercises or any other military activities by the armed forces of Montenegro, or by any of its nationals, if carried out in conjunction with armed forces of the non-State Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which engage in activities prohibited under the Convention, does not in any way imply an assistance, encouragement or inducement as referred to in subparagraph 1(c) of the Convention.”[7] Montenegro has also stated that it “does not intend to invest in the production of cluster munitions.”[8] Montenegro has not yet expressed its views on the matters of foreign stockpiling or transit of cluster munitions.
Montenegro is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty. It is also party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons.
Use, production, and transfer
Montenegro is not known to have used cluster munitions, but cluster munitions were used by NATO forces in air strikes on Serbian and Montenegrin military positions during the Kosovo conflict in 1999. In 2012, a court case confirmed evidence of at least one instance of Yugoslav army use of cluster munitions on Montenegrin territory in 1999.[9]
Montenegro has declared that there are no cluster munition production facilities in the country.[10]
Stockpile destruction
Montenegro inherited a stockpile of cluster munitions upon the dissolution of Serbia and Montenegro.[11] It completed the destruction of the entire stockpile of 353 BL755 cluster bombs containing a total of 51,891 Mk1 submunitions on 5 October 2010, concluding a two-year destruction process conducted near the town of Nikšićas as part of a technical agreement with the United States for the disposal of surplus weapons and ammunition.[12]
Montenegro has not retained any cluster munitions for training and research purposes.[13]
[1] In the March 2013 Article 7 report, Montenegro declared that the “provisions proscribed under the Convention are completely included into Montenegrin criminal legislature.” Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form A, 31 March 2013. In the January 2011 report, it declared that after ratification the convention “became an integral part of the criminal legislation of Montenegro.” Convention on Cluster Munition Article 7 Report, Form A, 27 January 2011.
[2] Montenegro also cited two articles from the Statute Book of Montenegro as relevant to implementation of the convention: Article 432 (“Use of unlawful means of combat”) and Article 433 (“Illegal production of weapons forbidden to be used”), both of which contain penal sanctions. Response to Monitor questionnaire by Maja Bošković, Third Secretary, Department for UN and Other International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration, 16 April 2010.
[3] The initial report covers the period from 1 August 2010 to 27 January 2011, while various periods are covered by reports provided in March 2013 (covering the period from 30 April 2012 to 31 March 2013) and 16 April 2014 for (calendar year 2013). Montenegro did not provide a report in 2012 for the period from February 2011 to April 2012.
[4] For details on Montenegro’s policy and practice regarding cluster munitions through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 121–122.
[5] This workshop was organized by the Regional Arms Control Verification and Implementation Assistance Centre (RACVIAC) Centre for Security Cooperation in Southeast Europe and the government of Germany, the government of Croatia Office for Demining, and the Croatian Mine Action Centre (CROMAC) in Zadar, Croatia.
[6] “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/RES/68/182, 18 December 2013. Montenegro voted in favor of a similar resolution on 15 May 2013.
[7] Letter No. 0715-42/3-2 from Amb. Milorad Šćepanović, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration to Mary Wareham, Senior Advisor, Arms Division, Human Rights Watch (HRW), 4 May 2011. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration expressed this view previously to the Monitor in April 2010, stating that “participation in planning or implementation of operations, exercise or other military activities by the armed forces of Monte Negro, performed in joint actions with armed forces of states not parties to the CCM, undertaking in activities prohibited by the CCM, are by itself not assistance, encouragement or initiative [sic] in accordance with Article 1, par (c) of the Convention.” Response to Monitor questionnaire by Maja Bošković, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration, 16 April 2010.
[8] Letter No. 0715-42/3-2 from Amb. Šćepanović, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration to Mary Wareham, HRW, 4 May 2011.
[9] In November 2012, a long-standing court case awarded €85,000 in compensation to the Dacić family, whose son, Senad, was killed in the village of Besnik near the Kosovo border on 26 March 1999, a day after BL755 bombs were used in the area around Besnik and the neighboring village of Njegusi. The government had claimed the bombs were dropped by NATO aircraft, but written evidence submitted by the Ministry of the Interior Court, as well as the testimony of former police chief Šemsa Dedeić, unequivocally established that the bombs were dropped by planes of the Yugoslav Armed Forces. According to Dedeić, the pilots were supposed to drop the payloads in Kosovo, but they were ordered back and dumped the munitions before they returned. Maja Boričić, “Država da isplati 85.000 eura porodici dječaka stradalog 1999” (“State to pay 85,000 euros to family of boy killed in 1999”), Vijesti, 7 November 2012; and Maja Boričić, “Avioni Vojske Jugoslavije bacili kasetne bombe na selo kod Rožaja” (“Yugoslav airplanes dropped cluster bombs on village of Rožaje”), Vijesti, 5 October 2012.
[10] Convention on Cluster Munition Article 7 Report, Form E, 16 April 2014; 31 March 2013; and 27 January 2011.
[11] During the Berlin Conference on the Destruction of Cluster Munitions, Montenegro confirmed that it had 353 BL755 CBU in its stockpiles from the former Yugoslav People’s Army. Statement of Montenegro, Berlin Conference on the Destruction of Cluster Munitions, 25 June 2009. See also South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, “Ammunition Technical Assessment of Montenegro (First Edition),” 4 March 2007, p. 39. The BL755 cluster bombs were produced by the United Kingdom.
[12] For a description of the destruction process, see CMC, Cluster Munition Monitor 2011 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2011), pp. 138–140. See also Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form B, 27 January 2011.
[13] Convention on Cluster Munition Article 7 Report, Form C, 16 April 2014; 31 March 2013; and 27 January 2011.
Mine Action
Contamination and Impact
The Republic of Montenegro became contaminated with mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW), mainly unexploded ordnance (UXO), as a result of conflicts during the break up of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the 1990s.[1]
Mines
In 2007, Montenegro was reported to have become the first Balkan country to be cleared of mines following clearance of antipersonnel mines in the territories of Rožaje and Plav, near the border with Serbia and Albania.[2] Its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 report for 2008 stated “there are no areas under Montenegro’s jurisdiction or control in which anti-personnel mines are known or suspected to be emplaced.”[3] However, Montenegro still had to survey a mountainous area on its borders with Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) to clarify if contamination on the Croatian side of the border also affects Montenegro.[4] As of July 2012, Montenegro had not formally declared completion of its Article 5 obligations.[5]
Cluster munition remnants
NATO air strikes between March and June 1999 involved the use of 22 cluster bombs of four different types: AGM-154A JSOW guided missiles, BL-755s, CBU-87/Bs, and Mk-20 Rockeyes. These scattered a little over 4,000 submunitions consisting of three different types: BLU-97A/B, MK-1, and MK 118.[6]
Montenegro’s initial Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 report affirmed that, as of 27 January 2011, “there are no contaminated areas in Montenegro.”[7] In July 2011, however, the director of the Regional Centre for Divers’ Training and Underwater Demining (RCUD) confirmed that unexploded submunitions had been found in 2007.[8] In 1999, after the air strikes, military units collected more than 1,800 submunition remnants, but Montenegro informed the intersessional meetings of the Convention on Cluster Munitions that clearance had not been conducted “fully according to humanitarian mine action standards” and that it planned to conduct a survey.[9]
Non-technical survey (NTS) conducted by Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA) between December 2012—April 2013 identified 87 polygons of suspected or confirmed hazardous areas covering a total area of 1.72km² located in 11 locations affecting five communities in three municipalities: municipality of Golubovci (communities of Mataguži and Golubovci), municipality of Rožaje (communities of Jablanica and Njeguši), and municipality of Tuzi (community of Šipčanik).[10] Of these, the most affected area was Golubovci municipality, particularly around its airport, which accounted for 1.38km² of the total, followed by Tuzi and Rožaje municipalities.
There are signs that submunitions may also be present in two other areas of Plav municipality, Bogajice and Murino, which could not be immediately investigated because of high levels of snow.[11]
Mine Action Program
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Public Administration established a Department for Emergency Situations and Civilian Safety in 2007. It lacks human resources and equipment, however. Because of a shortage of funds, the responsibility for explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) remained with the police.[12] Police set up an EOD team that currently has three trained members who conduct demolitions.[13]
RCUD has continued its role as the national mine action center.[14] RCUD was set up in 2002 by the government, which assigned the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Public Administration to “develop [the center’s] organization and its specification.”[15] It describes itself as a “public institution and has status of a legal entity realizing independently its functions assigned by the [government].”[16]
RCUD and NPA signed a memorandum of understanding in December 2012 under which NPA agreed to fund and implement a two-phase project—the “Cluster Munition Convention Completion Initiative for Montenegro”—involving, first, the conduct of NTS and, secondly, technical survey (TS) and clearance of areas where the presence of cluster munitions is confirmed. NPA agreed to set up a database and to develop capacity for NTS and quality management.[17] NPA has reported that the first phase of NTS was completed by April 2013 and involved one NPA survey team (two surveyors), one RCUD survey team (two surveyors), one NPA quality monitor, and two RCUD quality monitors.[18] Technical survey and clearance planned for the second phase are planned to begin in 2014 once funds are secured. Clearance is planned to be completed within 12 months from the start of operations.[19] NPA plans to engage operational recourses for phase two as follows: two to three manual teams (each team consisting of six operators and a team leader), one mine detection dog team (two dog handlers and two mine detection dogs), two medics, and one project coordinator.[20]
Land Release
Montenegro did not report any release of areas contaminated by mines or cluster munitions in 2013,[21] although NPA had previously stated that it expected to release 1.2–1.3km2 through TS and clearance and 0.4–0.5km2 through NTS.[22]
Survey in 2012–2013
NPA began a non-technical survey in December 2012 which was completed in April 2013 and identified 87 polygons of suspected or confirmed hazardous areas covering a total area of 1.2km2 affecting five communities in three municipalities (see Contamination and Impact section above).[23] Technical survey, clearance of confirmed hazardous areas, and the release of residual suspected hazardous areas through NTS was planned to commence in 2014 under phase two of the Completion Initiative.[24]
Mine clearance in 2013
No mine clearance on land has been reported in Montenegro since 2008.[25]
Article 5 Compliance
Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty, Montenegro is required to destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 April 2017. Officials stated publicly in November 2007 that Montenegro was free of mines, but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not formally declared completion of its Article 5 obligations and has not said when it plans to do so.[26]
Clearance of cluster munition-contaminated areas in 2013
Montenegro did not conduct clearance of cluster munition-contaminated area in 2013.
NPA, in cooperation with RCUD, has prepared 10 clearance and TS projects covering 834,630m2 to be undertaken during the second phase of the Completion Initiative, in addition to one project for underwater clearance covering 24,150m2. This reportedly corresponds to approximately 70% of the contaminated area that will be included in the TS and clearance activities.[27]
Compliance with Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Under Article 4 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Montenegro is required to complete clearance of all areas affected by cluster munition remnants under its jurisdiction or control by 1 August 2020.
In April 2013, Montenegro said it planned to complete clearance of all contaminated areas in 2014 “if the funds are provided.”[28] In early 2014, Montenegro indicated that clearance would be complete by “the end of 2016.”[29]
Battle area clearance in 2013
In 2013, Montenegro reported that one item of UXO was found in Golubovci during construction work. The item was destroyed by the Ministry of Interior of Montenegro.[30]
In the first six months of 2012, RCUD underwater teams worked on clearance of 8,000m2, finding and destroying a total of four tons of various UXO.[31] In July and August 2012, RCUD underwater teams reported that 2.5 tons of explosives had been removed from the Zeta river, in addition to an “aircraft bomb” from the Moraca in the center of Podgorica.[32]
Explosive ordnance disposal in 2013
In 2013, Montenegro reported that the police department had found and destroyed two “shells of antitank mines” and two pieces of antipersonnel mines without fuzes. An unidentified number of improvised explosive devices were also reported as having been destroyed. No further information on the location of the demining activities was given.[33]
Support for Mine Action
The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs contributed a total of approximately US$60,500 in 2013 in support of the joint NPA-RCUD non-technical survey and training for five quality monitors from RCUD.[34]
Support in 2013[35]
Donor |
Contribution in US$ |
Contribution in NOK |
Activity |
Norway |
57,675 |
338,575 |
Non-technical survey |
Norway |
2,800 |
17,143 |
Capacity building RCUD-Training for Quality Monitors |
Totals |
60,475 |
355,718 |
|
[1] Interview with Veselin Mijajlovic, Director, Regional Centre for Divers’ Training and Underwater Demining (RCUD), Bijela, 14 March 2007.
[2] See “Montenegro is the only one without mines in Balkans,” Pobjeda (Montenegrin daily newspaper), 8 November 2007; interview with Veselin Mijajlovic, RCUD, Podgorica, 16 March 2008; and Mine Ban Treaty Initial Article 7 Report, 2007.
[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Forms C and I, 2008. Montenegro’s subsequent Article 7 reports state “no change.”
[4] Email from Veselin Mijajlovic, RCUD, 29 July 2012; and interview, Podgorica, 18 February 2009.
[5] Email from Veselin Mijajlovic, RCUD, 29 July 2012.
[6] Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), “Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro,” July 2013, pp. 6 and 16.
[7] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report (for the period 1 August 2010 to 27 January 2011), Form F, 27 January 2011.
[8] Telephone interviews with Veselin Mijajlovic, RCUD, 19 and 25 July 2011.
[9] Statement of Montenegro, Convention on Cluster Munitions Intersessional Meetings, Geneva, 17 April 2012.
[10] NPA, “Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro,” July 2013, pp. 6 and 23; and response to Monitor questionnaire by Amela Balik, Operations Manager, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[11] NPA, “Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro,” July 2013, pp. 6 and 21.
[12] Telephone interview with Zoran Begovic, Assistant to the Minister, Ministry of Interior Affairs and Public Administration, 21 June 2011; email, from Zoran Begovic, Ministry of Interior Affairs and Public Administration, 8 April 2010; and interview with Borislav Miskovic, Montenegrin Police Force, Podgorica, 16 March 2008.
[13] Email from Zoran Begovic, Ministry of Interior Affairs and Public Administration, 28 June 2012.
[14] Email from Veselin Mijajlovic, RCUD, 29 July 2012.
[15] Sluzbeni list RCG (Official Gazette of Montenegro), No. 66, pp. 28–32.
[16] See the RCUD website.
[17] NPA, “Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro,” July 2013, p. 8.
[18] Email and response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[19] Ibid.
[20] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[21] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, 16 April 2014.
[22] NPA, “Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro,” July 2013, p. 27.
[23] Ibid., p. 6.
[24] Email and response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[25] See the Monitor Montenegro Mine Action Profiles 2008–2013 available on the Monitor website.
[26] Telephone interview with Stanica Andjic, Department for UN and Other International Organizations, Multilateral Sector, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 21 June 2011; “Montenegro is the only one without mines in Balkans,” Pobjeda, 8 November 2007; and “Montenegro cleared,” Dan, 9 November 2007.
[27] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[28] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, 31 March 2013.
[30] Ibid.
[31] Convention on Cluster Munitions Article 7 Report, Form F, 31 March 2013.
[32] See RCUD, “RCUD’s underwater deminers removed 2,5 t of explosives from the river Zeta,” undated but August 2012; RCUD, “RCUD antimine diving team pulled out aircraft bomb from Moraca river in the center of Podgorica,” undated but August 2012; and Veselin Mijajlovic, “The Regional Center for Divers Training and Underwater Demining,” Journal of ERW and Mine Action, Issue 17.2, Summer 2013, p. 16.
[33] Convention on Conventional Weapons Amended Protocol II Article 10 Report, Form B, 14 March 2014.
[34] Email and response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
[35] Response to Monitor questionnaire from Amela Balik, NPA, 3 March 2014.
Casualties and Victim Assistance
Victim assistance commitments
Montenegro is responsible for landmine survivors, cluster munition victims, and survivors of other explosive remnants of war (ERW). Montenegro has made commitments to provide victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty and has victim assistance obligations under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Casualties
Casualties Overview
All known casualties by end 2013 |
Unknown; 18 identified as occurring within the territory of Montenegro |
Casualties in 2013 |
0 (2012: 6) |
2013 casualties by outcome |
0 (2012: 6 injured) |
There were no mine/ERW casualties identified in Montenegro in 2013. In 2012, six casualties were identified in one incident with an antivehicle mine in Montenegro. In July 2012, four adults and two children were injured while traveling in a car near the city of Gusinje, close to the border with Albania. One of the adults, a woman, was Albanian.[1]
Prior to 2012, the last casualties reported in Montenegro were in 2008, when a border police officer was injured when he drove over a landmine and, in a separate incident, a child was injured by a hand grenade he found in a wall in Podgorica.[2] The Monitor identified 18 mine/ERW casualties (four killed and 14 injured) between 1999 and December 2013. This included seven children; adult casualties included a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Albanian citizen (in 2012).[3]
Cluster munition casualties
At least nine cluster munition casualties have been reported for Montenegro.[4] Unexploded submunitions have caused four civilian casualties since their use in 1999. Another five casualties occurred during cluster munition strikes, of which at least four were civilians.[5]
Victim Assistance
The total number of survivors living in Montenegro is not known; in 2004, 260 mine/ERW survivors were recorded as living in Montenegro.[6] In 2013, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), in cooperation with the Montenegrin Regional Centre for Underwater Demining, identified seven survivors of cluster munitions in Montenegro.[7]
Victim assistance coordination and participation
Montenegro designated contacts within the ministries of health and labor and social welfare as victim assistance focal points for the implementation of Article 5 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions; there is no specific victim assistance coordination mechanism.[8] In 2013, the government re-established the council on the rights of persons with disabilities within the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare. The then short-lived council had been abolished in 2011.[9] National NGOs criticized the placement of the council within the ministry, asserting that its lack of independence would limit its role and importance.[10]
The ministries of health, labor and social welfare, education and sports, science, culture, and human and minority rights all have responsibilities for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities. In December 2007, Montenegro adopted the Strategy for the Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro (2008–2016) to ensure compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).[11] An action plan for implementing the strategy in 2014–2015 was adopted in March 2014, including specific targets to improve availability and access to services and programs such as healthcare, social protection, and professional rehabilitation as well as to align policies and laws with the provisions of the CRPD.[12] The implementation of the strategy and its action plan is monitored by an intergovernmental working group which includes representatives of persons with disabilities.[13] The implementation of the strategy and its action plans was considered “poor” and “significantly behind.”[14]
Service accessibility and effectiveness
According to the government, emergency medical care is available for all citizens of Montenegro through the national Institute for Urgent Health Care.[15] Mine/ERW survivors, including survivors of cluster submunitions, along with all victims of war, are entitled to free medical care and physical rehabilitation, including prosthetic limbs, through the national health insurance system. This law, regulating the national health insurance, recognizes the category of victims of cluster munitions. However, it does not discriminate against or among cluster munitions victims, or between cluster munitions victims and those who have suffered injuries or disabilities from other causes; differences in treatment are based only on medical, rehabilitative, psychological, or socio-economic needs of victims.[16]
In November 2012, the Montenegrin court system awarded €85,000 in compensation for pain and suffering to the family members of a boy who was killed by a cluster submunition in 1999.[17] The court ruled that the state of Montenegro failed in its obligation to “protect and guarantee the safety of the citizens” when it failed to “warn the citizens about the immediate danger to life and safety and to properly control the area in the given circumstances;” those circumstances included the presence of cluster munition remnants following bombing.[18]
Survivors may be entitled to a monthly pension and other benefits, based on the degree of their disability, on equal terms as other persons with disabilities.[19] A law passed in May 2013 severely cut benefits for persons with disabilities, eliminating the subsidies received by some persons with disabilities. Disability allowances provided in 2013 did not cover the cost of living.[20]
In 2013, unemployment remained a serious problem for persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors. While there was a quota system that required employers to hire persons with disabilities, many employers opted instead to make payment into the government fund for employment and professional rehabilitation of persons with disabilities.[21] In 2013, there were allegations that the use of resources by the fund was not transparent.[22]
The Law on Prohibition of Discrimination of People with Disabilities (2011) was not implemented effectively in 2013. Montenegrin law required that public facilities be made accessible to persons with disabilities by September 2013, but a number of institutions remained inaccessible after the deadline.[23]
Montenegro ratified the CRPD on 2 November 2009. In March 2014, Montenegro submitted its initial report on the implementation of the CRPD, which was due in 2011. As of March 2014, Montenegro had not designated a focal point for the implementation of the CRPD or an independent mechanism to promote, protect, and monitor its implementation as called for by Article 33 (1) of the convention.[24]
[1] Montenegrin Police, “Investigation completed on the spot of explosion near the state border with excellent cooperation” (“Završen uviđaj na licu mjesta eksplozije u blizini državne granice, sa albanskom policijom ostvarena izuzetna saradnja”), 10 July 2012; M. Sekulovic, “Mini drove over a mine, more injured” (“Džip nagazio na minu, više povređenih”), Novsti (daily newspaper), 9 July 2012; and “The explosion at the Montenegrin-Albanian border” (“Eksplozija na crnogorsko-albanskoj granici”), Radio-television Serbia, 9 July 2012.
[2] ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2009: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada: October 2009).
[3] See previous reporting on the Monitor website.
[4] Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro: Non-technical Survey of Contamination and Impact (Podgorica: Regional Centre for Underwater Demining, Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA), May 2013), p. 27.
[5] Ibid.; and Handicap International (HI), Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), pp. 77–78.
[6] Serbia and Montenegro, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 25 October 2004.
[7] Cluster Munition Remnants in Montenegro: Non-technical Survey of Contamination and Impact (Podgorica: Regional Centre for Underwater Demining, NPA, May 2013), p. 27.
[8] Cluster Munition Convention Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2013), Form H.
[9] Report by the Commissioner of Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Visit to Montenegro 17 to 20 March 2014 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 23 June 2014), para. 83.
[10] United States (US) Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 28 February 2014.
[11] Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, “Information on Implementation of Action Plan for Realization of Strategy for Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro for 2010,” 27 April 2011.
[12] “Strategy for Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro: Action Plan for the Period of 2014 and 2015,” Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, March 2014.
[13] Report by the Commissioner of Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Visit to Montenegro 17 to 20 March 2014 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 23 June 2014), para 83.
[14] “Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21: Montenegro” (Geneva: UN Human Rights Council, 8 November 2012), A/HRC/WG.6/15/MNE/3, p. 9; and US Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 28 February 2014.
[15] Statement of Montenegro, Convention on Cluster Munitions Working Group on Victim Assistance, Geneva, 16 April 2012.
[16] Ibid.
[17] “State to pay 85,000 euros to family of boy killed in 1999” (“Država da isplati 85.000 eura porodici dječaka stradalog 1999”), Vijesti (daily newspaper), 7 November 2012.
[18] As stated by Judge Mirjana Vlahovic, provided to the Monitor via email by Velija Muric, Attorney-at-law, Rozaje, Montengro, 25 February 2013. Translation by Jelena Vicentic, Coordinator, Assistance Advocacy Access-Serbia, 11 March 2013.
[19] Cluster Munition Convention Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2013), Form H.
[20] US Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 28 February 2014.
[21] Ibid.; and Zero Project, “Zero Project Report 2013: International Study on the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” Klosterneuburg, Austria, November 2012, p. 85.
[22] US Department of State, “2013 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 28 February 2014.
[23] Report by the Commissioner of Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Visit to Montenegro 17 to 20 March 2014 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 23 June 2014), para 86.
[24] Ibid., para 84.
Support for Mine Action
Casualties
No new mine or explosive remnants of war (ERW) casualties were identified in Montenegro in 2011. In 2012,the media reported two casualties. In July, five people were injured bya landmine while traveling in a car near the city of Gusinje, close to the border with Albania.[1]
Prior to 2012, the last casualtiesreported in Montenegro werein 2008, when a border police officer was injured when he drove over a landmine and achild was injured by an M35 Italian hand grenade he found in a wall in Podgorica.[2]The Monitor has identified 11mine/ERW casualties (four killed andseven injured) between 1999 and December 2011.This included five children; one of the adults was a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Cluster submunitions caused fourcivilian casualties since their use in 1999. Another four civilian casualties occurred during cluster munition strikes.[3]
Victim Assistance
The total number of survivors living in Montenegro is not known; in 2004, 260 mine/ERW survivors were recorded as living in Montenegro.[4]Montenegro is known to have victims of cluster submunitions,[5]and as a States Party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Montenegro is therefore obligated to provide comprehensive victim assistance.
There is no specific victim assistance coordination in Montenegro. The Ministries of health, labor and social welfare, education and sports, science, culture, and human and minority rights all have responsibilities for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities.[6]In December 2007, Montenegro adopted the Strategy for the Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro (2008–2016), an action plan to ensure compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.[7] Progress towards the implementation of the strategy was reviewed by an intersectoral commission, including NGOs, in early 2011.[8] NGOs found that the government was significantly behind in implementing the strategy.[9]
According to the government, emergency medical care is available for all citizens of Montenegro through the national Institute for Urgent Health Care.[10]
Mine/ERW survivors, including survivors of cluster submunitions,along with all victims of war, are entitled to free medical care and physical rehabilitation, including prosthetic limbs, through the national health insurance system. This law, regulating the national health insurance, recognizes the category of victims of cluster munitions. However, it does not discriminate against or among cluster munitions victims, or between cluster munitions victims and those who have suffered injuries or disabilities from other causes; differences in treatment are based only on medical, rehabilitative, psychological or socio-economic needs of victims.[11] While all persons with disabilities are entitled to free health care, it was reported in 2011 that such care was not always satisfactory and, in at least one case, a person with a disability was refused care.[12]
In 2011, the disability allowance was insufficient and unemployment remained a serious problem for persons with disabilities, including mine/ERW survivors. There was a quota system that required employers to hire persons with disabilities but it was not adequately enforced.[13]
In May 2011, a new disability law was adopted that clarified what discriminatory actions were illegal; however, discrimination persisted and laws were not implemented effectively. Legislation required all new public buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities but older public buildings, including hospitals, were not accessible during 2011.[14]
Montenegro ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilitieson 2 November 2009.
[1]M. Sekulovic, “Mini drove over a mine, more injured,”(translated from the original title), Novsti (daily newspaper), 9 July 2012, www.novosti.rs/vesti/planeta.300.html:387650-Plav-Dzip-naleteo-na-minu-vise-povredjenih; and “The explosion at the Montenegrin-Albanian border,” (translated from the original title), Radio-television Serbia, 9 July 2012, http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/11/Region/1136278/Eksplozija+na+crnogorsko-albanskoj+granici.html.
[2]ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2009: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada: October 2009), www.the-monitor.org, accessed 13 July 2012.
[3]Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), pp. 77-78.
[4]Serbia and Montenegro, Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form J, 25 October 2004.
[5] Montenegro confirmed the presence of cluster submunition victims on its territory in April 2012. Statement of Montenegro, Convention on Cluster Munitions Working Group on Victim Assistance, Geneva, 16April 2012.
[6]US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 24May 2012.
[7]Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, “Information on Implementation of Action Plan for Realization of Strategy for Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro for 2010,” 27 April 2011, www.minradiss.gov.me/en/ministry?alphabet=lat, accessed 16 July 2012.
[8]Ibid., p. 2.
[9]US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 24May 2012.
[10] Statement of Montenegro, Convention on Cluster Munitions Working Group on Victim Assistance, Geneva, 16April 2012.
[11]Ibid.
[12]US Department of State, “2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Montenegro,” Washington, DC, 24May 2012.
[13]Ibid.
[14]Ibid.