Slovakia
Cluster Munition Ban Policy
Policy
The Slovak Republic has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
On 15 January 2014, the government approved a draft action plan to begin the process of Slovakia’s accession to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2014 by submitting the accession package to the government and parliament so that the instrument of accession can be deposited by 30 June 2015.[1] The plan lists five measures to ensure the implementation of Slovakia’s commitment to join the Convention on Cluster Munitions, including an immediate ban on the use of cluster munitions, “drafting the necessary legislative changes and other necessary measures related to the implementation of the convention,” and the preparation and submission of the accession package to the government. According to the plan, the Ministry of Defense is responsible for ensuring the destruction of stockpiled cluster munitions with a budget prepared by the Ministry of Finance.
In an April 2014 letter to the CMC, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs Miroslav Lajčák said that by approving the national action plan, the Slovak government has “made a serious political commitment and significant step towards the accession to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in a realistic timeframe.” According to Lajčák, the plan “defines practical measures and assigns specific tasks to relevant departments” to address all of the convention’s obligations and “identifies possible obstacles and puts forward optimal solutions.”[2]
The action plan was prepared on the basis of Resolution 810 of 6 November 2008 on the Convention on Cluster Munitions. The plan includes an explanatory note that concludes, “from the foreign policy point of view, it is undoubtedly beneficial and appropriate to accede to the convention.” The note lists the factors that have contributed to Slovakia’s decision to accede to the convention, including pressure from the international community including Amnesty International Slovakia as well as the Convention on Cluster Munitions’ “strong normative impact.” It finds that not joining the convention would have negative consequences for Slovakia, warning that the “inflexible and vague approach of non-signatory countries is unsustainable and may result in unnecessary isolation and significant international pressure on several fronts (political, economic, defense, security).” According to the note, due to public opinion “any use of cluster munitions by a party to an armed conflict would lead to the loss of its moral support from the international community.”
As a producer and exporter of cluster munitions, Slovakia previously cited economic concerns as a reason preventing it from joining the convention.[3] The explanatory note concludes that any “possible further export activities of cluster munitions can seriously damage the reputation of the foreign policy of the Slovak Republic” and finds “it is clear that under the influence of the convention, the markets for trading in banned cluster munitions will increasingly narrow and investment in this area will have little prospect.” According to the note, any loss of profit or jobs related to stopping the production of cluster munitions can be mitigated by redirecting production capacity to the destruction and delaboration of stockpile cluster munitions.
Another factor behind Slovakia’s decision is the failure of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) efforts in November 2011 to conclude a draft protocol on cluster munitions. As a party to the CCW, Slovakia previously expressed its support for a CCW instrument on cluster munitions.[4] According to the explanatory note, this “clearly determines the next steps” for Slovakia as the failure to conclude a CCW protocol on cluster munitions leaves the Convention on Cluster Munitions as “the only valid international instrument” that addresses the issue of cluster munitions.
Slovakia actively participated throughout the Oslo Process that led to the creation of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but repeatedly expressed its opposition to a categorical ban on cluster munitions. Slovakia joined the consensus adoption of the convention in Dublin in May 2008, but participated only as an observer in the convention’s Signing Conference in Oslo in December 2008. The explanatory note states that after a review of the convention on 6 November 2008, the government of Slovakia decided not to sign in December 2008.[5]
Slovakia has engaged in some meetings relating to the Convention on Cluster Munitions since 2011, despite not joining. It participated as an observer in the convention’s Meetings of States Parties in 2011 and 2012, but did not attend the Third Meeting of States Parties in Lusaka, Zambia in September 2013. Slovakia has not participated in the convention’s intersessional meetings in Geneva, such as those held in April 2014.
Slovakia has voted in favor of recent UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions condemning the Syrian government’s use of cluster munitions, including Resolution 68/182 on 18 December 2013, which expressed “outrage” at Syria’s “continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights…including those involving the use of…cluster munitions.”[6]
Slovakia is a State Party to the Mine Ban Treaty.
Use
In his April 2014 letter, the Deputy Prime Minister states that “the Ministry of Defence of Slovakia has already banned the use of cluster munitions by the Slovak army.”[7] Previously, in 2009 and 2010, Slovakia stated “the Armed Forces have not used and will not use cluster munitions ever in the military operations outside of the territory of the Slovak Republic.”[8] In 2009, the Minister of Defense stated that cluster munitions are not in service with Slovak troops deployed in military operations outside the territory of the Slovak Republic.[9]
Production, transfer, and stockpiling
Slovakia has produced, exported, and imported cluster munitions in the past and has a stockpile.
In April 2014, the Deputy Prime Minister stated that “Slovakia has already stopped producing cluster munitions.”[10] He also stated that Slovakia’s “export control policy on cluster munitions does not allow for export or transfer of cluster munitions” in accordance with the requirements of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.[11]
Previously, in May 2010, Slovakia announced that its armed forces had “adopted a new policy of not purchasing cluster munitions” but until the action plan was approved in January 2014, it had never made a public statement that it was no longer producing cluster munitions or committing to no further production.[12]
The action plan’s explanatory note contains a section on “economic aspects” that lists the Slovakian company “ZVS Holding” as “the only manufacturer” of cluster munitions and describes ZVS Holding as the “research and development” wing of Konštrukta Defence (previously referred to by the Monitor as “KONŠTRUKTA Defence a.s.”). According to the note, ZVS Holding manufactured two types of cluster munitions:
A 152mm artillery projectile containing dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) type submunitions with a “self-destructing” capability.[13]
A 122mm “AGAT” rocket containing 50 dual-purpose and six incendiary submunitions; both types of submunition can self-destruct.
ZVS Holding apparently also offered a 98mm K-PT mortar bomb containing self-destructing DPICM-type submunition but it appears that “development closed” on this munition.[14]
According to the explanatory note, the “final delivery” of cluster munitions to “foreign partners” was in February 2010. The note states that ZVS Holding produced 8,680 122mm AGAT rockets for Turkey and the United Arab Emirates between 1998 and 2010, and 602 cluster munitions for Slovakia’s Ministry of Defence between 1998 and 2001. According to the note, anticipated exports to Cyprus, Poland, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates were not concluded.[15]
The explanatory note finds that Slovakia’s accession to the Convention on Cluster Munitions will have some impact on ZVS Holding’s business sector and estimated that it would directly affect approximately 100 production workers, technicians and administrative staff in addition to 50 other Slovak subcontractors.[16]
Cluster Munition Monitor previously listed Slovakian company Technopol International as involved in the production of the AGAT 122mm cargo ammunition, but its relationship to ZVS Holding is presently unclear.[17] Technopol held licenses for the export of cluster munitions.[18]
Stockpiling
In January 2014, as part of the adoption of its national action plan on joining the convention, Slovakia publicly disclosed information on the types and quantities of its 899 stockpiled cluster munitions, as detailed in the following table.
Cluster munitions stockpiled by Slovakia (January 2014)[19]
Quantity and type of cluster munition |
602 122mm AGAT rockets |
67 M26 rockets |
95 RBK cluster bombs and 3,303 submunitions |
135 KMG-U cluster bomb dispensers |
899 Total |
Previously, in 2010, the Ministry of Defense informed the Monitor that the stockpile was comprised of M26 rockets,[20] 122mm AGAT rockets, RBK bombs, and KMG-U dispensers, but did not provide any information on the quantities.[21]
In April 2014, the Deputy Prime Minister stated that Slovakia is “determined to honor our obligation and seek the necessary resources” to destroy the stockpile despite the technical demands and resources required from the national budget.[22] The national action plan estimates that this implementation of the convention’s obligations will cost approximately €5.5 million in 2016–2023.[23]
[1] “Draft Action Plan for the Implementation of the Commitments of the Slovak Republic under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.” Attached to Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, Director, CMC, 25 April 2014.
[2] Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014.
[3] Previously in 2010, the government issued a policy paper which stated that Slovakia is not “in a position for the moment to join the Convention” due to concerns over the cost of stockpile destruction and the time period necessary for the replacement of weapons systems. The 2010 paper stated that Slovakia had decided to undertake a number of measures aimed at addressing the problems posed by cluster munitions, including no use of cluster munitions outside Slovakia’s territory, no future acquisition of cluster munitions, and the destruction of existing stocks deemed “not absolutely necessary.” Slovakia, “Position paper on the Cluster Munitions,” provided to the CMC by the Embassy of the Slovak Republic to the United Kingdom (UK), London, 25 May 2010; and CMC meeting with Milan Vojtko and Darina Kosegiová, Embassy of the Slovak Republic to the UK, London, 25 May 2010.
[4] For years, Slovakia supported efforts to conclude a CCW protocol on cluster munitions. At the UN General Assembly (UNGA) First Committee on Disarmament and International Security in October 2012, Slovakia expressed regret “that the State Parties failed to utilize benefits of the CCW framework to find an acceptable global response to concerns associated with cluster munitions.” Statement by Amb. František Ružička, Permanent Representative of the Slovak Republic to the UN in New York, UNGA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, New York, 1 November 2012.
[5] “Draft Action Plan for the Implementation of the Commitments of the Slovak Republic under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.” Attached to Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014. For more details on Slovakia’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 239–242. In 2011, Wikileaks released three United States (US) diplomatic cables from the period January 2007 and May 2008 showing that the US consulted regularly with Slovakian government officials during the Oslo Process, specifically Karol Mistrik, then-Director of the Disarmament, Organization for Security Co-operation in Europe, and Counter-terrorism Department at Slovakia’s Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. For example, see “Cluster munitions are not landmines,” US Department of State cable 07BRATISLAVA41 dated 22 January 2007, released by Wikileaks on 1 September 2011.
[6] “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic,” UNGA Resolution A/RES/68/182, 18 December 2013. Slovakia voted in favor of a similar resolution on 15 May 2013.
[7] Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014.
[8] Letter from Miroslav Lajčák, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs, 1 October 2009; and Slovakia, “Position paper on the Cluster Munitions,” provided to the CMC by the Embassy of the Slovak Republic to the UK, London, 25 May 2010.
[9] Letter from Jaroslav Baška, Minister of Defense, 16 June 2009.
[10] Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014.
[11] Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014. He made a similar statement in a 2013 letter to the CMC that stated: “concerning the risk of proliferation, we fully adhere to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. The Slovak export control policy on Cluster Munitions, based on this principle, does not allow export of Cluster Munitions.” Letter No.101.381/2013-KAMI from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2013.
[12] In May 2010, Slovakia announced that its armed forces have “adopted a new policy of not purchasing cluster munitions.” The Minister of Defense confirmed in June 2010 that the “purchase of additional cluster munitions for the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic is not expected.” In April 2013, Slovakia’s Deputy Prime Minister confirmed that the “Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic have adopted a new policy of not purchasing cluster munitions and replace [sic] them with other systems in a gradual process allowing a transition into ensuring Government defence interest[s] on a new basis.” Slovakia, “Position paper on the Cluster Munitions,” provided to the CMC by the Embassy of the Slovak Republic to the UK, London, 25 May 2010; letter from Jaroslav Baška, Minister of Defense, 16 June 2009; and letter from Jaroslav Baška, Minister of Defense, 16 June 2009.
[13] Terry J. Gander and Charles Q. Cutshaw, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 2001–2002 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited 2001), pp. 321 and 627.
[14] The Konštrukta Defence website lists the mortar bomb here and the status of the program is listed here, accessed 26 July 2013.
[15] According to the note, the most extensive negotiations were with the Turkish firm ROKETSAN, which it stated supplies weapon systems for the Turkish army. In 2011, a contract was signed for the supply the AGAT rockets, but the financial reasons and due to personnel changes in the leadership of the Turkish army, the Turkish Ministry of Defense did not to sign the contract to produce 8,000 cluster munitions at a cost of €25.6 million.
[16] It acknowledges that no contracts were fulfilled in 2010–2013 and notes that an increasing number of states have joined to the Convention so the markets for cluster munitions “continues to decline.”
[17] ZVS Holding a.s. website, “Products: special production,” undated; Technopol International website, “AGAT 122mm cargo ammunition,” brochure, undated,; and Technopol International, “Products: AGAT 122mm cargo ammunition,” undated. In June 2011, a Technopol official informed the Monitor that the company advertised the 122mm AGAT rocket for export and had exported the weapon “many times” during the past 10 years that it had been produced. Telephone interview with Bajca Dusan, Director, Technopol, 13 June 2011. By July 2013, Technopol’s website no longer listed the 122mm AGAT rocket.
[18] According to the Ministry of Economy, the Technopol International licenses were issued on 22 September 2009 and 27 August 2009, and expired on 31 December 2010. Letter from Lubomír Kovačik, Ministry of Economy, 1 December 2009.
[19] Explanatory note, “Draft Action Plan for the Implementation of the Commitments of the Slovak Republic under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.”
[20] In 2004, Germany transferred 270 M26 rockets and transferred another 132 in 2005, but it is unclear if these were transfers of individual rockets or pods containing six rockets each. Each M26 rocket has 644 submunitions. Submission of Germany, UN Register of Conventional Arms, Report for Calendar Year 2004, 26 May 2005; and Report for Calendar Year 2005, 1 June 2006. In February 2009, the Slovak Ministry of Defense reportedly cancelled further orders of M26 rockets and suggested that it would replace its existing stocks of cluster munitions with other munitions by 2016 to 2020 at the latest. “Slovak Defense Ministry cancels orders for cluster munitions,” Zibb, 3 February 2009. The original source cited is the Slovak News Agency (SITA) website, Bratislava, BBC Monitoring.
[21] Letter from Col. Boris Pittner, Deputy Director General, Ministry of Defense, 19 March 2010.
[22] Letter No.590.736/2014-OKOZ from Miroslav Lajčák, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs to Sarah Blakemore, CMC, 25 April 2014.