Key
developments since May 2000: The Ministry of Defense acknowledges that
Singapore continues to produce antipersonnel mines, and asserts that it has a
stockpile “for training and defensive purposes only.”
The Republic of Singapore has not acceded to the
Mine Ban Treaty. It believes that a “blanket ban on all types of
anti-personnel landmines might be counterproductive since some countries need to
use anti-personnel landmines for their defence and
security.”[1] While there
has been no policy change since this statement was made in November 1999, the
Ministry of Defense told Landmine Monitor that Singapore is reserving the right
to use antipersonnel mines until an alternative is
found.[2] In July 2001,
Singapore’s Ambassador to the United States said, “We do not condone
the indiscriminate use of APLs, especially against civilians. However, we
believe that the legitimate security concerns and right of self-defence of
states cannot be
disregarded.”[3]
Singapore
sent a representative from the Ministry of Defense to the Second Meeting of
States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in September 2000. It has voted in favor
of all pro-ban UN General Assembly resolutions since 1996, including Resolution
55/33V in November 2000. It has not attended the Mine Ban Treaty intersessional
meetings in Geneva, including those in December 2000 and May 2001. While it is
not a State Party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), Singapore
sent an observer to the CCW’s Amended Protocol II Annual Conference in
December 2000.
A Campaign to Ban Landmines was launched in Singapore on 16
June 2001, with a week of activities organized by The Think Centre in
cooperation with the Bangkok-based Nonviolence International. Activities
included a press conference, videos, a special website with photo essays, and a
public opinion poll in which 90% of the respondents supported accession to the
Mine Ban Treaty.[4] Earlier, in
November 2000, the Singapore Institute of International Affairs invited the ICBL
Ambassador, Tun Channareth, to speak at the National University of Singapore
Undergraduate Seminar on Regional Affairs. He called on Singapore to join the
Mine Ban Treaty and his visit was reported in The Strait Times,
Singapore’s main English language
newspaper.[5]
Production, Transfer, Stockpiling and Use
According to the Ministry of Defense, Singapore
Technologies Kinetics Ltd. is the only company in Singapore that produces
antipersonnel landmines.[6]
These are a plastic mine (VS-50) and a bounding mine
(VS-69).[7] Low-level
production of these mines
continues.[8] At least several
million have already been
produced.[9]
Landmine Monitor
found no evidence of Singapore exporting antipersonnel landmines since the
government proclaimed a moratorium on the export of all types of antipersonnel
mines for an indefinite period in February 1998. According to the Ministry of
Defense the export ban covers all transfers of mines, including for military aid
or for training
purposes.[10]
In a 16 July
2001 letter to Landmine Monitor, the Ambassador of Singapore to the United
States said, “ST Kinetics is the only company in Singapore that produces
APLs. The APLs produced are meant solely for use by our armed forces for
self-defence purposes only. ST Kinetics does not export APLs as Singapore had,
since Feb 1998, declared an indefinite moratorium on the export of all types of
APLs.”[11]
In December
2000, a Ministry of Defense representative stated that the Ministry of Defense
retains a number of antipersonnel mines for “training and defensive
purposes only.” He noted, “Such training for APLs and removal
techniques is done in
Singapore.”[12] The
number of mines in stockpile is not known.
Singapore Technologies Kinetics
Limited is carrying out ongoing destruction of expired antipersonnelmines by demolition, on behalf of the Ministry of
Defense.[13]
Mine Action
Singapore is not mine-affected and Landmine
Monitor has not recorded any landmine victims residing in Singapore. It does
not appear that Singapore has contributed in any way to international
humanitarian mine action programs. In May 2000, the government said that it was
considering the most useful way it could contribute.
[1] Singapore’s
explanation of vote on UNGA Resolution A/C.1/55/L.44, 8 November
1999.
[2] Interview with
Andrew Tan, Policy Director, Ministry of Defense, Singapore, 29 March
2001.
[3] Letter from Amb.
Chan Heng Chee, Singapore Ambassador to the United States, to Mary Wareham,
Coordinator, Landmine Monitor, 16 July
2001.
[4] See The Think
Centre’s website at
www.thinkcentre.org.
[5] Jack
Hee, “Landmine victim pushes for ban,” The Straits Times, 29
November 2000.
[6] Letter
from Eric Chong, Singapore Ministry of Defense, 15 December 2000 and interview
with Andrew Tan, Policy Director, Ministry of Defense, Singapore, 29 March
2001.
[7] Singapore
Technologies product brochures, “Mine, Anti-Personnel, Jumping,
VS-69” and “Mine, Anti-Personnel, Scatterable, VS-50.”
Undated but distributed at an arms exhibition in
1997.
[8] Telephone interview
with Prasun Sengupta, Special Projects Editor, Asia Defence Journal,
Malaysia, 8 July 2000.
[9]
Stephen Askin and Stephen Goose, "The Market for Anti-Personnel Landmines-A
Global Survey," Jane's Intelligence Review, 1 September 1994, p.
425.
[10] Interview with
Andrew Tan, Policy Director, Ministry of Defence, Singapore, 29 March
2001.
[11] Letter from Amb.
Chan Heng Chee, Singapore Ambassador to the United States, to Mary Wareham,
Coordinator, Landmine Monitor, 16 July
2001.
[12] Letter from Eric
Chong, Ministry of Defense, 15 December 2000. The language would imply training
in both how to use mines and how to clear
them.
[13] Interview with
Andrew Tan, Policy Director, Ministry of Defense, Singapore, 29 March 2001.
Email from Andrew Tan, Policy Director, Ministry of Defense, Singapore, 12 April
2001.