+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
 
Table of Contents
Country Reports
THAILAND , Landmine Monitor Report 2005

Thailand

Key developments since May 2004: The Minister of Foreign Affairs served as President of the Fifth Meeting of States Parties until the November 2004 Review Conference. The Master Plan on Humanitarian Mine Action of Thailand for 2005-2009 was launched; this does not refer to the Article 5 deadline of 1 March 2009 for clearance of all mined areas. Less than one percent of mine-contaminated area has been cleared after six years. In 2004, over two square kilometers of land were cleared and area-reduced, with a further 500,000 square meters cleared in January-May 2005. The government contributed US$965,000 to mine action within Thailand, and international donors provided a similar amount. TMAC’s plans to create a fifth demining unit were postponed due to lack of government funding. During the reporting period, more than 120,000 people received mine risk education. In 2004, TMAC recorded fewer mine casualties than in 2003. A national plan for mine victim assistance was under development. At the First Review Conference, Thailand was identified as one of 24 States Parties with the greatest needs and responsibility to provide adequate survivor assistance.

Mine Ban Policy

The Kingdom of Thailand signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997, ratified on 27 November 1998, and became a State Party on 1 May 1999. Thailand has not enacted comprehensive domestic legislation to implement the Mine Ban Treaty, and there has been no apparent progress toward adoption of any national implementation measures.[1] Thailand submitted its seventh annual Article 7 report on 25 April 2005, covering calendar year 2004 and including voluntary Form J.[2]

The Deputy Prime Minister of Thailand, Suwat Liptapanlop, led the country’s delegation to the First Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty in Nairobi in November-December 2004. In his statement during the high level segment of the meeting, he noted, “While plans and priorities of individual countries are necessary to address mine-related problems, close partnership and shared experiences between States as well as with NGOs and international organizations are essential parts of the solution. It is imperative that mine action becomes a part of the regional agenda so that countries can better help one another through cooperation. In this regard, each and every country has a role to play.”[3]

At the Review Conference, Thailand formally concluded its position as President of the Fifth Meeting of States Parties, a role carried out by then Minister of Foreign Affairs (now Deputy Prime Minister), Dr. Surakiart Sathirathai. At the outset of the Review Conference, Dr. Sorajak Kasemsuvan, the Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, read a statement on behalf of Minister Sathirathai that focused on the progress made during Thailand’s Presidency, as well as the challenges ahead, and called for the establishment of a global fund for humanitarian mine action as a means to enhance resource mobilization.

The Minister’s statement said, “Looking back at the success so far of the Convention, we owe it not only to the firm commitment and tireless efforts of States Parties, but to many NGOs and volunteer organizations, most importantly the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the landmine survivors themselves through the Landmine Survivor Network. However, a lot still remains to be done to realise our shared goal of a mine-free world. Looking ahead, I wish to emphasise the following priorities: Firstly, we must continue to uphold multilateralism, under the framework of the United Nations, as the best way to contribute to the further success of the Convention. Secondly, we must continue to promote regional initiatives and encourage countries to make landmines an important part of the regional agenda. Thirdly, we must ensure that the United Nations, the World Bank, international financial institutions, and regional organisations integrate mine action into their programmes. Fourthly, we must ensure that sufficient resources are mobilised to assist the implementation of the Convention, particularly in capacity building for the poorest mine-affected States. Lastly, as the Convention is an exemplary model of partnership between the State, NGOs and the international organizations, we must continue to encourage enhanced interaction and cooperation between them.”[4]

Thailand has said that during its Presidency, “We have spared no efforts in the areas of universalization, victim assistance, resource mobilization and other elements of the Convention....”[5] In a particularly notable initiative, Minister Sathirathai led a delegation of the Resource Mobilization Task Force to meet with the President of the World Bank at its Washington, DC headquarters on 20 September 2004 to discuss cooperation between the World Bank and the mine action community. It was agreed that antipersonnel mines are a developmental as well as humanitarian issue, with significant socioeconomic implications. The World Bank expressed its readiness to fund mine action projects with a sound developmental basis.[6]

Thailand has continued to promote universalization of the Mine Ban Treaty. Its Vice Minister and the Advisor of Foreign Affairs visited Bhutan, Bahrain, Morocco, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Ukraine, Mongolia, Palau and Tonga during Thailand’s presidency to encourage them to accede to the Mine Ban Treaty and to participate in the First Review Conference.[7] Thailand, along with other States Parties, sent joint démarches regarding the treaty to countries such as Singapore and Vietnam.[8]

Thailand attended the intersessional Standing Committee meetings held in June 2005, where it made interventions on the country’s problems, plans, progress and priorities for mine action and victim assistance. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs hosted a regional workshop on mine clearance and victim assistance challenges from 30 August to 1 September 2004.[9]

Thailand has not engaged in the extensive discussions that States Parties have had on matters of implementation and interpretation related to Articles 1, 2 and 3. Thus, Thailand has not made known its views on issues related to joint military operations with non-States Parties, antivehicle mines with sensitive fuzes or antihandling devices, and the permissible number of mines retained for training.

The Thailand Campaign to Ban Landmines (TCBL), a coalition of 11 NGOs, continued its advocacy of the antipersonnel mine ban and rights of landmine survivors. Activities in 2004 included advising the Thailand Mine Action Center (TMAC) on its national master plan on victim assistance. TCBL members, jointly or singly, are engaged in programs which support and empower landmine survivors in Thailand, and lobby the authorities to universalize the Mine Ban Treaty and ensure full implementation within Thailand.

Production, Transfer and Use

Thailand states that it has never produced or exported antipersonnel mines, including Claymore mines.[10] In the past, it appears that Thailand imported antipersonnel mines from China, Italy, the United States and former Yugoslavia.[11]

On 6 April 2005, the National Chief of Police of Thailand was reported as saying that police stations in the country’s southern provinces should erect barriers and even “plant landmines around their perimeters to block car bombs and insurgent attacks.” The remark received widespread media coverage and generated many expressions of concern.[12] The TMAC Director met with the Police Chief, who claimed his comments were “threats as a deterrent” and indicated there was no intention to approve use of landmines; he added that the police did not possess any stocks of the weapon. The Police Chief subsequently directed police stations to increase protection by using “barriers, warning systems and other appropriate policies” and not by planting mines. The Supreme Command Office of the Thai Armed Forces assigned TMAC to send a letter to all security forces stressing Thailand’s commitment to adhere to the prohibition against use of antipersonnel mines.[13]

Stockpiling and Destruction

On 24 April 2003, Thailand completed the destruction of its stockpiled antipersonnel mines. Thailand initially held 342,695 antipersonnel mines.[14] From 1999 to 2003, a total of 337,725 mines were destroyed.[15]

Thailand kept a total of 4,970 antipersonnel mines for development and training purposes, as permitted under Article 3 of the treaty.[16] The number of retained mines has remained the same since 2001, indicating that none have been consumed (exploded) during training activities. Thailand has not yet reported in any detail on the intended purposes and actual uses of its retained mines―a step agreed to by States Parties in the Nairobi Action Plan that emerged from the First Review Conference.

In November 1999, Thailand reported that it also had 6,117 M18 and M18A1 Claymore mines in stock.[17] TMAC reiterated in 2005 that all units have been briefed that Claymore mines are to be used only in command-detonated mode. However, no physical modifications have been undertaken to ensure use in command-detonated mode.[18]

During an amnesty for illegal weapons from 17 October to 15 December 2003, individuals surrendered an unknown number of antipersonnel mines including M14s, M26s and Claymores.[19] After the amnesty period, more mines were found in canals, rivers, and even central municipal areas of several provinces.[20] No information regarding these mines or their destruction appeared in Thailand’s May 2004 or April 2005 Article 7 reports.

Landmine and UXO Problem

Thailand is contaminated by mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) as a result of conflicts, including insurgency warfare, on all four of its borders.[21] According to the Landmine Impact Survey (LIS) conducted by Norwegian People’s Aid in 2000-2001, the total contaminated area covers approximately 2,556 square kilometers in 27 provinces along the Cambodia, Laos, Burma and Malaysia borders. A total of 531 communities in these provinces were reported to be affected. Three-quarters of the contaminated land is in the border area with Cambodia.[22] There is no evidence that Thailand's mine/UXO problem has been reduced significantly since 2000-2001.

Many mine/UXO-affected areas remain unmarked. Generally, mined areas are only marked in those areas where mine clearance activities are taking place.[23] Mine incidents causing casualties continued to be reported in 2004-2005. (See Landmine Casualties section.)

Mine Action Program

The National Committee for Humanitarian Mine Action has responsibility for matters of policy, coordination, and international aspects of mine action in Thailand. It was set up by the Prime Minister in 2000, is chaired by the Prime Minister and includes representatives of all major ministries and departments.[24]

The Thailand Mine Action Center is responsible for implementation of mine action plans. TMAC has been a military agency since it was established in 1999, reporting to the Supreme Command Headquarters of the Royal Thai Armed Forces. In 2005, a proposal that TMAC become a civilian agency was discussed in detail; change in TMAC status had not been announced as of September 2005.

The Director General of TMAC considered that its transformation into a civilian agency would ensure a humanitarian approach to mine action, compliance with the treaty obligations, allow planning of mine action in support of socioeconomic development, and allow the development of TMAC as a regional mine action center.[25]

Mine action is carried out by four Humanitarian Mine Action Units, which report to TMAC but are under the direct supervision of several Army and Navy Task Forces, whose mandate is not exclusively mine action. This structure has hampered mine action productivity, and prompted TMAC to propose that it become a civilian agency. TMAC reports that it lacks skilled personnel, with many positions remaining vacant and inadequate training both for mine action operations and use of the Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) database. It has had to rely on headquarters staff assigned on a short-term basis only. The four mine action units which carry out demining are not directly under its command; some are employed on a short-term basis. TMAC plans to establish a fifth mine action unit in 2004 were postponed, due to lack of government funding.[26]

The Master Plan on Humanitarian Mine Action of Thailand No. 2, covering the period 2005-2009, was launched early in 2005. This stressed the integration of the National Mine Action Plan into the National Socioeconomic Development Plan and local plans. The master plan also places greater attention than its predecessor on the provision of victim assistance.[27]

TMAC’s policy priorities consist of area reduction through technical survey accompanying mine clearance on the basis of a given area’s relevance to civilian use and public utility. Priorities are: areas for village farming and cultivation; public areas such as temples and schools; government projects, economically strategic areas and border crossings with neighboring countries.[28]

TMAC’s headquarters are in Bangkok; it also has a training center for deminers in Ratchaburi province, a training center for mine risk education in Lopburi province, and a training center for detection dogs in Nakhorn Ratchasima province. TMAC provides training for civilian deminers on the condition that they are nominated by a demining organization with clearly stated objectives. In 2004, it provided training for Japan Alliance for Humanitarian Demining Support (JAHDS) national staff.[29]

TMAC staff numbers decreased slightly in 2004, to 445. Its mine detection dogs were increased from 26 to 32 in 2004.[30] The United States field-tested mine clearance machines in Thailand in 2004 and early 2005; the machines were not donated to Thailand.[31]

In addition to the mine action units, TMAC supported two other mine clearance projects in 2004. One was at Mor Ee Daeng Cliff around Kao Phra Vihan Sanctuary Area in Si Sa Ket province, where the units worked in collaboration with JAHDS and the Mekong Organization for Mankind. The second project was in Ban Non Sang, Aranyaprathet District in Sa Keao province, undertaken by the General Chatichai Choonhavan Foundation (GCCF).[32]

Survey and Assessment

The Landmine Impact Survey conducted in 2000-2001 is the basis for all mine action operations in Thailand, and is cited in the new plan for 2005-2009. In order to reduce the number of mine-affected areas, TMAC intends to conduct a “level two impact survey.” The aim is to verify which areas are mine/UXO contaminated and to perimeter-mark affected areas, allowing effective planning of demining operations and use of demining capacity. A pilot project to survey 96,000 square meters was launched in Sa Keao in June 2005.[33]

Mine and UXO Clearance

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty, Thailand must destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 May 2009.

Thailand has cleared less than one percent of the total contaminated area in the six years since it became a State Party; on this basis, the government may not meet its clearance obligation.[34] Thailand's strategic plan 2005-2009 does not clarify this issue. The Director General of TMAC, Major-General Tumrongsak Deemongkol, refers to organizational constraints and inadequate funding as factors which may hamper Thailand's fulfillment of its Article 5 obligations.[35] However, in a presentation to the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in June 2005, Thailand stated that it was “determined to fulfill its obligations despite limited resources and manpower.”[36] On 22 June 2005, the Deputy Prime Minister stated that Thailand would honor its Article 5 obligation.[37]

In 2004, a total of 2,011,210 square meters was cleared by the four mine action units and by JAHDS, according to TMAC.[38] However, the Article 7 report for 2004 states the total area cleared to be 2,418,691 square meters, which TMAC explained as a miscalculation.[39] During clearance in 2004, TMAC destroyed 243 antipersonnel mines, eight antivehicle mines and 86 UXO.[40]

In 2003, a much smaller area (718,910 square meters) was reported cleared. However, according to TMAC, comparison with 2003 may be misleading as many areas were cleared but not verified and therefore not included in the 2003 results reported. TMAC’s acceleration in verification and handing over of cleared land in 2004 also accounts for a significant amount of the increase in total area cleared, as do increased amounts of area reduction.[41] TMAC handed over a total area of 2,298,457 square meters to authorities in 2004 and an additional 143,103 square meters between January and March 2005.[42]

In January-May 2005, an additional 522,568 square meters were reported as cleared.[43] In the first quarter of 2005, TMAC found and destroyed 31 antipersonnel mines and 13 UXO.[44]

The first phase of demining operations by JAHDS at the Mor Ee Daeng Cliff in August 2004-July 2005 cleared 318,202 square meters. The operation was able to continue into 2005 as Japan for the second time granted financial support to JAHDS in July 2004.[45] JAHDS also conducted survey in preparation for the second phase of operations in 2005.[46] According to the Kao Phra Vihan National Park and the Si Sa Ket provincial plan, JAHDS’s working site at the Mor Ee Daeng Cliff is intended for the development of camping and trekking tourism. With the support of three mine detecting dogs, two Hitachi Brush Cutters and four Bozena machines, demining operations at Mor Ee Daeng Cliff were carried out jointly by 24 JAHDS deminers and 15 officers from the third mine action unit. The target for clearance in 2005 is 357,755 square meters.[47]

GCCF did not conduct demining operations in 2004. From February to May 2005 it cleared 48,926 square meters in Ban Non Sang and Sa Kaeo. These figures are not included in TMAC reporting for 2005 at present. The Sa Kaeo area has seen a recent influx of Thai villagers and new cross-border trade is taking place.[48]

No demining accidents were reported in Thailand in 2004.[49]

Mine Risk Education

In 2004 and in the first three months of 2005, the four mine action units and three NGOs―Handicap International-Thailand (HI-Thailand), Catholic Office for Emergency Relief and Refugees (COERR) and Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC)―conducted mine risk education (MRE), which reached a total of 123,485 people. This included 108,574 people reached by the units;[50] 13,078 by HI-Thailand’s Disability and Development and Burmese Border Programmes;[51] 1,533 by COERR;[52] 300 by ADPC.[53]

The humanitarian mine action units' mobile MRE teams reach out to people in communities through community leaders where they organize group training sessions and then place warning signs jointly with the trainees. The teams visit each community for seven days and other topics for training, such as producing organic fertilizers to substitute for chemical fertilizers, may be included.[54]

In April 2005, HI-Thailand completed a one-year MRE project in the Si Sa Ket and Ubonratchathani provinces with support from UNICEF. HI trained teachers from 31 schools in eight districts in the two provinces. Risk education on mine danger was given to students in grades 4-6 by the mobile MRE team. An MRE local curriculum was developed and integrated into schools near the border areas. The project will benefit 31 school directors, 35 trained teachers and supervisors, 3,512 students and other villagers reached by the mobile MRE team. Around 3,500 more people were exposed to public MRE campaigns.[55]

Teachers became the informal leaders of the community liaison team as they were able to link MRE in student groups to mine awareness for parent groups and other villagers, including groups of landmine survivors. As a result, the community network in mine action in mine-affected communities of Si Sa Ket and Ubonratchathani is expanding.[56] HI-Thailand also conducted MRE and trained more than 6,000 people in refugee camps in the Tak, Mae Hong Son, Kanchanaburi and Ratchaburi provinces bordering Burma, with support from UNHCR and ECHO.[57]

In 2004, with funds from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, COERR implemented an MRE program to train 35 teachers and 1,498 primary school students in 13 schools in Ta Praya, Aranyaprathet and Koksoong Branch district in Sa Kaeo province. It also facilitates community liaison for mine action by inviting and including the mine action units, landmine survivors, teachers and community leaders to participate in their activities.[58]

In 2004, ADPC conducted a program, Mine Risk Education Program for School Teachers in Mine-Impacted Communities along the Thai-Myanmar Border, for 300 participants, including schoolteachers, school directors and supervisors in Mae Hong Son and Chiang Mai provinces.[59]

Funding and Assistance

International donors reported contributing funding totaling $964,945 to mine action in Thailand in 2004, which is a decrease from $1.2 million reported in 2003.[60] International donors in 2004 included:

  • European Commission: €250,000 ($310,950) for MRE and victim assistance for refugees on the Thai-Burma border;[61]
  • Japan: ¥70,200,000 ($649,099), consisting of ¥67 million ($619,510) for mine clearance and ¥3,200,000 ($29,589) to GCCF for MRE;[62]
  • Norway: NOK33,000 ($4,896) to the Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs for a mine conference.[63]

TMAC reported that it received no direct funding from international donors in 2004.[64] In the Thai fiscal year 2005 (1 October 2004-30 September 2005), TMAC received Baht 38.3 million (US$957,500) from the government, in addition to seconded staff.[65] Approximately Baht 30 million (US$750,000) of TMAC’s budget was allocated to mine clearance, with only small amounts for victim assistance and MRE. TMAC dealt with victim assistance and MRE indirectly by coordinating other agencies providing victim assistance and by integrating other agencies' MRE staff into operational demining teams.[66]

Landmine Casualties

In 2004, TMAC’s four Humanitarian Mine Action Units (HMAUs) recorded 24 new mine casualties; three people were killed and 21 injured.[67] This represents a decrease from 29 new mine casualties recorded by TMAC in 2003.[68] Landmine Monitor also identified casualties from outside the HMAU operational areas. In June, in Narathiwat province near the Malaysian border, two landmines injured four policemen providing security for teachers during the civil unrest in the province.[69] In 2004, 10 amputees from the border area of northeastern Thailand, including three Cambodians, and five amputees from the southern part of Thailand were transferred to the Phramongkutklao Hospital in Bangkok.[70] Although not confirmed, they are likely to be landmine survivors.

The TMAC database does not include all landmine casualties in Thailand. TMAC continues to develop a nationwide data collection mechanism; however, casualty information continues to be derived from HMAUs which cover only 16 provinces located mainly on the Thai-Cambodian border, with some information also obtained from the Ministry of Public Health.[71] It is estimated that there are about 100 new mine casualties a year in Thailand.[72]

Casualties continued to be reported in 2005. HMAU 3 reported one person killed in January, and HMAU 2 and 3 each reported one person injured in February 2005.[73] Other reported casualties include incidents on 20 March and 16 April, when one villager lost both legs and one villager lost one leg in landmine explosions. Both had gone into the forest to collect vegetables.[74] In a separate incident on 16 April, two teenage boys and a former soldier were killed by an M79 landmine while tampering with the device in Sadao, Songkhla province.[75] On 19 April, a 13-year-old boy lost an arm and leg after he picked up an M79 landmine at a military camp near the Thai-Cambodia border in Chanthaburi province while looking for food in the forest.[76] On 9 May in Sa Kaeo, a man lost a leg and the sight in one eye in a landmine incident; he received assistance from other villagers and border patrol police. On 14 May in Mae Hong Son a villager lost their leg in a mine explosion; ICRC covered the cost of medical assistance.[77]

The most comprehensive data collection on casualty remains that of the nationwide Landmine Impact Survey, which ended in May 2001. The survey recorded a total of 3,468 mine/UXO casualties, of which 1,497 people were killed and 1,971 injured.[78]

Survivor Assistance

At the First Review Conference, Thailand was identified as one of 24 States Parties with significant numbers of mine survivors, and with “the greatest responsibility to act, but also the greatest needs and expectations for assistance” in providing adequate services for the care, rehabilitation and reintegration of survivors.[79]

As part of its commitment to the Nairobi Action Plan, Thailand has outlined some of its objectives for the period 2005-2009 to address the needs of mine survivors which include: increasing the registration rate of persons with disabilities by 80 percent, and including information on the cause of disability; organizing a training workshop for emergency and medical care; training survivors and their families in “self-help” for physical therapy; building up the sustainable development of physical and psychosocial rehabilitation services with an emphasis on community participation; extending vocational training and income generation opportunities in the mine-affected areas, including through a fund to promote self-employment; developing and improving effective legislation to protect the rights of mine survivors and other persons with disabilities; stimulating the public and private sector to implement laws that promote the capacities of persons with disabilities; setting up action plans in coordination with local authorities; improving coordination mechanisms between all relevant actors; developing better quality of life and care for landmine survivors.[80]

Thailand submitted the voluntary Form J with its annual Article 7 report, with information on its regional workshop on challenges in mine clearance and victim assistance.[81]

TMAC includes victim assistance in its mine action program and has taken on the role of coordinator for activities of government agencies and NGOs; however, it does not include provisions for victim assistance in its budget allocations. Progress is being made on the development of a master plan on mine victim assistance. Victim assistance was discussed at the two seminars held in August-September 2004 and March 2005. In May 2005, TMAC hosted another meeting of representatives from government agencies and NGOs to develop the details of a plan of action. The aim is to integrate victim assistance into the National Socioeconomic Development Plan (2007-2011). TCBL, in collaboration with other NGOs is drafting a strategy to present to TMAC. Mine survivors participated in all meetings.[82] In 2004, TMAC provided 37 wheelchairs for mine survivors in the Thai-Cambodian border provinces.[83]

Generally, medical assistance available to landmine survivors is adequate; however, most incidents involve poor marginalized farming families who experience difficulties coping with the costs of care and rehabilitation. Medical and rehabilitation services in Thailand are available through the national health insurance scheme.[84]

The Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Center is the main coordinating organization for the care of people with disabilities. In 2004, the center distributed 4,543 prostheses, 4,389 wheelchairs and 642 crutches; the number of mine survivors benefiting is not known.[85]

The Prosthetic Foundation, under the royal patronage of the late Princess Mother Sri Nagarindhra, continues to provide mobile prosthetic services in remote areas. In 2004, 1,800 prostheses were provided to 1,500 beneficiaries; about 25 percent are mine survivors.[86]

In 2004, the Foundation of Artificial Limbs (Mahavajiralongkorn) at Phramongkutklao Hospital in Bangkok distributed 954 prostheses, 300 crutches and 100 wheelchairs to persons with disabilities in Thailand.[87]

Handicap International-Thailand operates community-based rehabilitation and prosthetic programs and orthopedic workshops to assist all persons with disabilities, including landmine survivors. In December 2004, HI started a new program, Development on Quality of Life of Children with Disabilities and Landmine Survivors at Border Areas in Si Sa Ket and Ubonratchathani, using the community-based rehabilitation approach, including through the setting up of prosthetic workshops and training technicians, vocational training, support of self-help groups, and promoting the rights of people with disabilities. The project will end in December 2005 and is funded by the government for Baht 2,496,000 ($63,900).[88]

In 2004, the Association of Persons with Physical Disabilities (APPDI) undertook a public collection of ring-tops from aluminum cans, which were recycled by the Prosthetic Foundation in Chiang Mai to produce 1,000 prostheses. APPDI also supported 10 children of people with disabilities, including two children of landmine survivors, by providing scholarships of Baht 1,000 per year (US$26).[89]

In September 2004, the General Chatichai Choonhawan Foundation, with partial support from Canada and the Thai Health Promotion Foundation, started the Health Care and Rehabilitation Program for Landmine Victims. Two prosthetic centers were set up in Tha Kham sub-district of Aranyaprathet district, Sa Kaeo province and in Ubonratchathani province. Five landmine survivors from each province were trained and received technical support from the Prosthetic Foundation to produce and maintain prostheses in their areas. The centers aim to serve not only Thai mine survivors but also Cambodian survivors living along the border.[90]

The Catholic Office for Emergency Relief and Refugees supports the children of landmine survivors in Sa Kaeo province through the provision of school and sports uniforms, equipment, stationery and other supplies. In 2004, 146 children were assisted. COERR also provided two wheelchairs for mine survivors.[91]

In 2004, the Thai Soroptimist International chapter of Dusit, a women’s service organization, provided eight daughters of landmine survivors in Surin and Sa Kaeo provinces with a grant of Baht 24,000 ($615) for their primary and secondary school education.[92]

On 28 July 2004, the International Symposium on Landmine Injuries and Rehabilitation was held via videoconference between the Phramongkutklao Hospital in Bangkok, and the Tripler Army Medical Center and Shriners Hospital for Children in Honolulu. The project was funded by the Freeman Foundation, with support from the Joint US Military Advisory Group Thailand (JUSMAGTHAI). JUSMAGTHAI also assisted in the Prosthetics Field Seminar in Pua village, in Nan Province, from 7-15 October 2004. Two US Army prosthetic/orthopedic surgeons from the Tripler Army Medical Center accompanied doctors from the Prosthetic Foundation to provide new prostheses for about 300 amputees in the remote Pua village.[93] From 25-29 October 2004, a seven-man team of Washington National Guard advanced trauma experts (doctors and medics) exchanged expertise with 20 Royal Thai Army doctors and medics, and Thai NGO trainers, in Aranyaprathet in the mine-affected Sa Kaeo province, to improve first response treatment for mine casualties.[94]

Landmine survivors from Burma seeking assistance in Thailand receive medical care at hospitals in refugee camps and public district hospitals in the Thai-Burma border provinces, including Tak, Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Mae Sariang, Kanchanaburi and Ratchaburi. The Mae Tao Clinic (MTC) in Mae Sot, Médecins Sans Frontières, International Committee of the Red Cross, International Rescue Committee, American Refugee Committee, Aide Medicale International and Malteser Germany, all provide emergency medical referral in Thailand to war injury survivors who arrive across the border. Prosthetics and rehabilitation are also available at the MTC prosthetic department, and within refugee camps at prosthetics workshops run by HI.

In 2004, MTC assisted 16 people with landmine injuries; all but two were referred onward to the government hospital in Mae Sot. From January to April 2005, five new landmine survivors arrived; four were referred to the Mae Sot hospital. MTC’s prosthetic department provided prostheses for 205 people, including 181 mine survivors, in 2004. MTC also runs a training program for prosthetic technicians from ethnic minority health and welfare departments. In early 2005, six people were undergoing training in prosthetics production. Two trainees were mine survivors from the Karenni Peoples National Liberation Front (KPNLF), two were from the Karen National Union (KNU), one from the Burmese Health and Welfare Department, and one from the Karen Handicap Welfare Association. Another person from KPNLF was being trained in the administration of a prosthetics program. The prosthetics department receives support from Clear Path International.[95]

ICRC supported 49 landmine survivors from Myanmar for hospital care in Thailand in 2004.[96] Srisangwal Hospital, in Mae Hong Son, assisted eight mine casualties between December 2004 and April 2005; all were either Karenni or Burmese.[97]

HI’s Burmese Border Programme reports that between January 2004 and February 2005, 53 new mine casualties from Myanmar crossed the border and sought medical services in either refugee camps or hospitals in Thailand. In 2004, HI’s program assisted about 3,000 displaced persons through rehabilitation activities, including 858 landmine survivors, produced and fitted 227 prostheses and 77 other assistive devices, and distributed 37 crutches and 19 wheelchairs.[98]

Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) played a coordinating role to support the participation of landmines survivors in all landmine-related meetings in Thailand in 2004 and 2005, and the First Review Conference in Nairobi. In 2004, JRS supported TCBL with a full-time landmine survivor officer and a full-time assistant to the TCBL coordinator.[99]

Two Thai landmine survivors participated in the Survivors Summit and First Review Conference in Nairobi in November-December 2004.

Disability Policy and Practice

Thailand has legislation and policies to protect the rights of persons with disabilities. Three ministries are assigned to promote the interests of persons with disabilities: Ministry of Social Development and Human Security (MSDHS), Ministry of Education and Ministry of Public Health. MSDHS has direct responsibility for disability issues through the Office of Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities.[100]

In 2004, MSDHS launched a community-based rehabilitation pilot program, for the period 2004-2006, in five provinces to address the needs of people with disabilities in rural areas.[101]

The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand also plays a role in survivor assistance by receiving complaints on human rights violations in relation to landmines and Thailand compliance to the Mine Ban Treaty.[102]

Organizations of persons with disabilities are active in Thailand, raising awareness on their rights and needs, and lobbying the government for action. On 14 November 2004, the Association of Persons with Physical Disabilities, with support from TCBL and other disability organizations, organized the 10th Bangkok City Handi-Marathon; more than 600 people, including 200 people with disabilities, participated. On 25 April 2005, the president of APPDI met with the Minister of Social Development and Human Security and presented a policy paper which demanded that the government allocate no less than one percent of the budget to issues related to people with disabilities.[103]


[1] Last year, Landmine Monitor reported that Thailand had prepared “The Office of the Prime Minister Regulations Governing the Implementation of the Convention” and that this document would be used to amend existing regulations to implement the ban treaty. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs hoped to have the amendments ready by the time of the Review Conference, but this did not occur and as of August 2005 no concrete steps had been taken. Article 7 Report, Form A, 3 May 2004; interview with Sarun Charoensuwan, Director of Peace, Security and Disarmament Division, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, 18 February 2004; telephone interview with Col. Teera Saipradist, Deputy Director of Thailand Mine Action Center, 7 September 2004; telephone interview with Nichamon Agrasuta, Third Secretary, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 22 August 2005.

[2] The six other Article 7 reports were submitted on: 3 May 2004; 22 July 2003; 30 April 2002; 17 April 2001; 2 May 2000; 10 November 1999.

[3] Statement by Suwat Liptapanlop, Deputy Prime Minister, High Level Segment of the Nairobi Summit on a Mine-Free World (First Review Conference), Nairobi, 3 December 2004.

[4] Statement by Dr. Surakiart Sathirathai, Minister of Foreign Affairs, delivered on his behalf by Dr. Sorajak Kasemsuvan, Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs, at the Opening Ceremony of the First Review Conference, Nairobi, 29 November 2004.

[5] Statement by Suwat Liptapanlop, Deputy Prime Minister, First Review Conference, Nairobi, 3 December 2004.

[6] Interview with Komgrit Varakamin, Director of Peace, Security and Disarmament Division, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, 28 April 2005; interview with Witchu Vejjajiva, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Thailand to the UN in Geneva, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 14 June 2005.

[7] Interview with Kittiphong na Ranong, Director-General, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 16 June 2005. The countries were selected based on their potential to join the Mine Ban Treaty and their relationship with Thailand. Five of these countries attended the Review Conference (Bahrain, Morocco, Bhutan, Ukraine and Mongolia)

[8] Interview with Kittiphong na Ranong, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 16 June 2005.

[9] Article 7 Report, Form J, 25 April 2005; interview with Komgrit Varakamin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, 28 April 2005.

[10] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, Director General, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005. A number of sources have identified Thailand as a past producer. For details, see Landmine Monitor Report 1999, p. 376.

[11] This list is based on the types of mines in stock that Thailand later destroyed.

[12] “NSC puts country on ‘red alert’; Landmines to protect police in remote South,” Bangkok Post, 6 April 2005; “Four killed in southern unrest as Thailand tightens security,” Agence France-Presse (Pattani), 6 April 2005; “Thailand must restrain military to defuse crisis,” South China Morning Post, 9 April 2005.

[13] Letters to the National Reconciliation Commission, Army, Navy, and Air Force were sent on 20 April 2005 and the letters to the Ministry of Interior and the Police were sent on 29 April 2005. Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005. Copies of the letters were provided to the TCBL and others.

[14] Types of antipersonnel mines in stockpile included M2, M2A4B2, M4, M14, M16, M16A1, M26, Type 66, Type 69, Type 72, PAM2, VAR 40, VS50 and PMN. Article 7 Report, Form B, 17 April 2001.

[15] See Landmine Monitor 2004, pp. 803-804.

[16] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005.

[17] Article 7 Report, Form B, 10 November 1999. Other than this first report, Thailand has not included information in its Article 7 reports on stockpiled Claymore mines.

[18] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, Director General, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005. Use of Claymore mines with a tripwire is illegal under the Mine Ban Treaty.

[19] Mines were collected in at least four provinces (Khon Kaen, Yasothon, Trang and Ranong). “Summary results of handed in weapons and explosives between 17 October-15 December,” Matichon, 17 December 2003, p. 13; “Several types of explosives found discarded in front of Khon Kaen Muang district hall,” Manager (online news source, manager.co.th), 23 November 2003; “Explosive confiscated in Trang,” Government Public Relations Department official website (prd.go.th), 27 November 2003; “Yasothorn police found M-26 explosive hidden in traveling bag,” Manager, 30 November 2003; “Illegal weapon surrendered to Ranong officials as deadline draws near,” Government Public Relations Department, 11 December 2003 (in Thai language).

[20] “Numerous explosives and war weapons found in Khorat provincial center,” Manager, 19 December 2003; “Weapons and explosives found in Udonthani,” Thai government website, 19 December 2003; “M26 explosive found at Chao Phraya river bank in Samut Prakarn,” Manager, 2 February 2004.

[21] “Country profile: Thailand,” www.mineaction.org.

[22] “Landmine Impact Survey: Kingdom of Thailand,” Survey Action Center, 2002, p. 17; Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 804-805.

[23] Telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[24] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 806; TMAC website, www.tmac.go.th.

[25] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 15 July 2005. Interest in developing TMAC as a regional mine action center was reiterated by Kittiphong na Ranong, Director-General, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 16 June 2005.

[26] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005, and telephone interview 29 April 2005. Three of the mine action units have 99 staff; the fourth has 56.

[27] “The Master Plan on Humanitarian Mine Action of Thailand, No. 2, 2005-2009,” TMAC, Bangkok, 2005.

[28] Interviews with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April and 15 July 2005.

[29] Telephone interview with Senior Col. M.L. Ladawan Kamalasana, Chief of Special Affairs Division, TMAC, 30 May 2005.

[30] Fax from TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[31] Interviews with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 and 29 April 2005; TMAC, “Monthly Events Report,” April 2004; email from Lt. Col. Scott Elder, JUSMAGTHAI, 2 May 2005.

[32] Telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, 29 April 2005.

[33] Interviews with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 and 29 April and 15 July 2005; Pilot Project: Technical & Level II Impact Survey, Sa Keao Province, www.tmac.go.th. The “level two impact survey” may refer to technical survey/area reduction.

[34] The LIS identified 2,556 square kilometers of mine contamination. To the end of 2003, 1.16 square kilometers had been cleared; in 2004, a further two square kilometers were cleared.

[35] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005.

[36] Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Standing Committee on the General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 14 June 2005.

[37] Interview with Police General Chitchai Wannasathit, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior, Bangkok, 22 June 2005.

[38] Interview with Col. Narongrit Suwanbubpha, Acting Chief of Operation Coordination Division, TMAC, Bangkok, 15 July 2005.

[39] Article 7 Report, Form C, 25 April 2005; interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 15 July 2005.

[40] Article 7 Report, Form G, 25 April 2005.

[41] Interviews with Sr. Col. M.L. Ladawan Kamalasana, Chief of Special Affairs Division, TMAC, Bangkok, 16 May and 29 May 2005; telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, Director General, TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005. TMAC clearance data includes area reduction.

[42] Monthly Reports, TMAC, January 2004-March 2005; Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2005.

[43] Interview with Col. Narongrit Suwanbubpha, TMAC, Bangkok, 15 July 2005.

[44] TMAC, “Monthly Reports, January-March 2005,” www.tmac.go.th.

[45] Telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005; “The Government of Japan Provides Grant Assistance for Landmine Clearance Project,” embjp-th.org/en/jics/press/0440.htm, accessed on 30 April 2005.

[46] Telephone interview with Paitoon Butthasen, Manual Demining Supervisor, JAHDS, 29 May 2005.

[47] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Nattabhong Padphraphorom, Assistant Manager, JAHDS, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[48] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Suthikiet Sopanik, Director, GCCF, Bangkok, 20 May 2005.

[49] Telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 2 August 2005.

[50] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005.

[51] Information provided by Prapanrat Kochasena, Project Coordinator of HI-Thailand for Mine Risk Education in Si Sa Ket and Ubonratchathani, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[52] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire by COERR, Bangkok, 27 April 2005.

[53] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire by Panniya Binsri and Sirikarn Kahattha, Project Officers, ADPC, 25 April 2005.

[54] Telephone interview with Maj. Somchai Koukool, Assistant Chief of Staff for Operations, Suranaree Task Force, 29 April 2005.

[55] Information provided by Prapanrat Kochasena, Project Coordinator of HI-Thailand for Mine Risk Education in Si Sa Ket and Ubonratchathani, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[56] Information provided by Wasita Kitpreecha, Assistant Project Coordinator for Mine Risk Education in Srisaket and Ubonratchathani, HI-Thailand, 29 April 2005.

[57] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire by Timo Koster, Program Manager for the Burmese Border Program, Mae Sot district, Tak province, HI-Thailand, 20 April 2005. UNHCR is the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. ECHO is the European Community Humanitarian Office.

[58] Telephone interview with Charatkorn Mankatitham, Operations Manager, COERR, Bangkok, 29 April 2005; response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire by COERR, Bangkok, 27 April 2005.

[59] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire by Panniya Binsri and Sirikarn Kahattha, Project Officers, ADPC, 25 April 2005.

[60] Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 809.

[61] EC, “Contribution to the Landmine Monitor 2005,” by email from Nicola Marcel, RELEX Unit 3a Security Policy, EC, 19 July 2005

[62] Email from Kitagawa Yasu, Japanese International Campaign to Ban Landmines (JCBL), 10 August 2005, with translation of Ministry of Foreign Affairs information sent to JCBL on 11 May 2005. Average exchange rate for 2004: ¥108.15 = US$1. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2005.

[63] Article 7 Report, Form J, 28 April 2005; emails from May-Elin Stener, Department for Global Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, April-May 2005. Average exchange rate for 2004: US$1 = NOK6.7399. US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2005.

[64] Interviews with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 and 29 April 2005; “Multi-year Activity Reports on Coordination, Integrated Mine Action, Mine Clearance, and Victim Assistance,” UNMAS Mine Action Investments database.

[65] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005. The average 2003 exchange rate is used here (US$1=BAHT41.564). US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (annual),” 5 January 2004.

[66] Interviews with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 and 29 April 2005; telephone interview with Maj. Somchai Keukoon, HMAU 3, 29 April 2005.

[67] Fax from TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005; TMAC, “Summary of Humanitarian Mine Action in Thailand of Year 2004,” www.tmac.go.th/mineclearance/clearance2004.htm, accessed 14 August 2005.

[68] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 811.

[69] “Violence in the South,” Bangkok Post, 25 June 2004.

[70] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Col. Dr. Fusathe Jongfuangprinya, MD, Deputy Director, Department of Orthopedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, 25 April 2005.

[71] Telephone interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, 29 April 2005.

[72] Thailand presentation, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 16 June 2005.

[73] “Report of Humanitarian Mine Action in Thailand of January 2005”; “Report of Humanitarian Mine Action in Thailand of February 2005,” (Thai language versions),www.tmac.go.th, accessed 28 April 2005; fax from TMAC, Bangkok, 29 April 2005.

[74] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Charatkorn Mankatitham, Operation Manager, Kreumas Polpratheep, Assistant Operation Manager, and Suthipong Yamsa-Nga, Aranyaphrathet Coordinator, Catholic Office for Emergency Relief and Refugees, 27 April 2005.

[75] “Three Killed in Grenade Accident: M79 found at Police Training Complex,” Bangkok Post, 17 April 2005, p. 3.

[76] “Explosion Causes Loss of Limbs of a 13-Year-Old Boy,” www.komchadluek.net, accessed 19 April 2005.

[77] Email from Sermsiri Ingavanija, Assistant Coordinator, TCBL, JRS Asia Pacific, Bangkok, 30 May 2005.

[78] For more details see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 811-812.

[79] United Nations, Final Report, First Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction, Nairobi, 29 November - 3 December 2004, APLC/CONF/2004/5, 9 February 2005, p. 33.

[80] Response by Thailand to the Co-Chairs of the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration questionnaire, 28 September 2005.

[81] Article 7 Report, Form J, 25 April 2005.

[82] Interview with Maj. Gen. Tumrongsak Deemongkol, TMAC, Bangkok, 19 April 2005; letter from TMAC, Reference. No. Gor Hor 0320.20/219, 22 April 2005; TMAC, “Master Plan on Humanitarian Mine Action of Thailand, No. 2 2005-2009,” Bangkok, 2005; interview with Komgrit Varakamin, Director, Peace, Security and Disarmament Division, Department of Foreign Affairs, Bangkok, 28 April 2005; interview with Emilie Ketudat, Coordinator, TCBL, Bangkok, 26 April 2005.

[83] TMAC, “Summary of Humanitarian Mine Action in Thailand of Year 2004,” www.tmac.go.th/mineclearance/clearance2004.htm, accessed 14 August 2005.

[84] For more information see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 812.

[85] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Kanchana Boonkasem, Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Center, 27 April 2005; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 816.

[86] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Prof. Terdchai Chivakate, Secretary-General, Prosthetic Foundation, Chiang Mai province, 22 April 2005; information provided by Dr. Direk Essarangkul Na Ayutthaya, Board Committee, Prosthetic Foundation, to Medical Demining Issues Video Conference Preparation, Phramongkutklao Hospital, 5 May 2004; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 813.

[87] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Col. Dr. Fusathe Jongfuangprinya, Deputy Director, Department of Orthopedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, 25 April 2005; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 814.

[88] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Nipatta Quamman, Assistant Project Coordinator, Disability and Development Program, HI-Thailand, Bangkok, 27 April 2005; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 814.

[89] Interview with Maj. Sirichai Sapsiri, President, APPD, 2 May 2005; APPD, Newsletter, January-December 2004.

[90] Letter from the General Chatichai Choonhawan Foundation, No. 48/07, 7 March 2005; “Artificial Limbs Center Opened in Sa Kaeo,” www.manager.co.th, accessed 10 April 2005.

[91] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Charatkorn Mankatitham, Operations Manager, Kreumas Polpratheep, Assistant Operation Manager, and Suthipong Yamsa-Nga, Aranyaphrathet Coordinator, COERR, 27 April 2005.

[92] Sermsiri Ingkawanich, “Report on Activities of JRS Ban Landmine Project,” JRS, Bangkok, 28 April 2005.

[93] Pramongkutklao Hospital, “International Symposium on Landmine Injuries and Rehabilitation”, Bangkok, 27 July 2004; email from Maj. Scott Elder, JUSMAGTHAI, Bangkok, 2 May 2005.

[94] Email from Maj. Scott Elder, JUSMAGTHAI, Bangkok, 2 May 2005.

[95] Landmine Monitor analysis of hospital records at the Mae Tao Clinic, Mae Sot, 9 May 2005; Mae Tao Clinic Prosthetics Department Report, January to December 2004.

[96] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Christophe Menu, Field Delegate, ICRC, Chiangmai, 1 May 2005.

[97] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Chaisri Klanarong, Srisangwal Hospital, Mae Hong Son, 27 April 2005.

[98] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Timo Kosters, Program Manager, Burmese Border Program, HI-Thailand, Mae Sot, 20 April 2005.

[99] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Sermsiri Ingkawanich, JRS, 28 April 2005; Interview with Emilie Ketudat, Coordinator, TCBL, 26 April 2005.

[100] For more information see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 816-817; see also “Current Situation of Persons with Disabilities,”
www.apcdproject.org/countryprofile/thailand/thailand_current.html and www.dredf.org/international/thailand.html.

[101] Interview with Mayuree Pewsuwan, Persons with Disabilities’ Capacity Promotion and Development Division, Bureau of Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities, Bangkok, 27 April 2005.

[102] Response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire from Prof. Pradit Chareonthaitawee, MD, National Human Rights Commission of Thailand, Bangkok, 25 April 2005.

[103] Interview with Maj. Sirichai Sapsiri, President, APPD, 2 May 2005; APPD, Newsletter, January-December 2004; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 816.