Key developments since May 2002: Local
survey data gives, for the first time, a detailed view of mine and UXO
casualties and contamination in portions of two heavily-affected central
provinces. Mine and UXO clearance, risk education, and survivor assistance
projects continued to expand, including into new areas of the country.
Mine Ban Policy
Vietnam has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty.
The People’s Army of Vietnam continues to view landmines as necessary and
cost-effective weapons for national
defense.[1] Nevertheless,
Vietnam remains “in full support” of humanitarian aspects of mine
clearance and survivor
assistance.[2]
As in past years, Vietnam abstained from voting on the annual UN General
Assembly resolution supporting universalization of the Mine Ban Treaty in
November 2002. Vietnam did not participate in the Fourth Meeting of States
Parties in Geneva in September 2002 or in the intersessional Standing Committee
meetings in February and May 2003.
Vietnam has not ratified the Convention on Conventional Weapons, which it
signed in 1981, and it did not attend any CCW meetings in 2002 or 2003. It also
stayed away from the regional seminar on mine action in Southeast Asia, held in
Phnom Penh in March 2003.
At an annual plenary meeting for international NGOs in January 2003 in Hanoi,
Ambassador Le Van Bang, former ambassador to the US and currently chair of the
Committee for Foreign NGO Affairs, identified landmines and unexploded ordnance
(UXO) as one of four priority areas for NGO assistance in
development.[3]
Production, Transfer, Stockpiling, and Use
Vietnam is believed to continue the production and
stockpiling of an unknown number of landmines, while maintaining a policy
against export. In a Landmine Monitor interview, a high-ranking Ministry of
Defense official stated that “Vietnam does not keep large storesof
landmines, but we have enough to protect our country against
invasion.”[4]
There are no reports of new mine use by the Vietnamese government forces.
Past Landmine Monitor reports have referred to unconfirmed allegations of mine
use, or, more accurately, re-use and recycling, by hunters, fishers, smugglers
and scrap metal dealers. In 2002, more details on these activities emerged in
the press. Poachers in Pu Mat National Park were found using landmines to kill
endangered animals and to deter park rangers, resulting in open warfare between
the poachers, rangers and local
police.[5] Another story cites
the use of “home-made explosives and mines” to catch fish in the
central provinces of Ha Tinh, Quang Binh and Quang Ngai. One respondent claims,
“Everyone [in my village] is keen to use mines as you can retrieve so many
more fish with
them.”[6]
Some of these mines may be actual antipersonnel landmines laid during the
war. In most cases, however, they are improvised devices made from explosives
extracted from war-era bombs and shells. “Bomb hunters” search for
and dig up this ordnance, selling the metal to scrap dealers and the explosives
to other intermediaries, who then supply the hunters and
fishers.[7] At a price of up to
1.5 million dong (US$100) per disassembled bomb, the reward is much higher than
from agriculture or other
jobs.[8] There are reports of
injuries and deaths at all stages of this process, making up a significant
portion of mine- and UXO-related incidents in 2002. Two percent of respondents
to a mine awareness survey in Quang Tri admitted to taking part in removal,
disassembly, and/or sales of landmines or
UXO.[9]
Landmine and UXO Problem
The Technology Center for Bomb and Mine Disposal
(BOMICO), a department of the Engineering Command of the Ministry of Defense,
revised its estimate of landmine- and UXO-affected land in Vietnam from
“at least 5%” of the country to “approximately 7-8%.”
Between 15 and 20 percent of mines and UXO from the war are said to
remain.[10] Official sources
continue to use figures ranging from 350,000-800,000 tons of war-era ordnance in
the ground.[11] The Vietnam
Veterans of America Foundation (VVAF) has cited Ministry of Defense sources as
stating that “three million [antipersonnel] landmines remain in
Vietnam’s soil.”[12]
All 61 provinces are affected, as well as major cities. The Ministry of
Defense states that the most affected portions of the country are the central
provinces from the former DMZ southward, including Quang Tri, Quang Nam and
Quang Ngai.[13]
The Boundaries Committee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed in May
2003 that despite significant clearance in the 1990s, landmines remain a serious
problem on the Chinese and Cambodian borders. Few mines but many UXO are found
on the Lao border. Minefields exist from as long ago as the Dien Bien Phu
campaign against the French in 1954, extending through border conflicts with
China and the Khmer Rouge in the 1970s. Zones that are suspected to be
affected, called “white areas,” are closed to the public and marked.
In other cases, maps of minefields are not available, or locations have shifted
due to floods, landslides and
erosion.[14]
A Landmine Monitor review of the Vietnamese domestic press from January 2002
through March 2003 found mine and UXO incidents in 40 of 61 provinces and
cities, including Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh
City.[15] Out of 86 recorded
incidents, only 14 percent took place in the three central provinces (Quang
Binh, Quang Tri, Thua Thien-Hue) where international assistance is concentrated.
The largest number of incidents took place in the former South Vietnam, with Phu
Yen province on the south-central coast and Gia Lai in the Central Highlands
recording the highest
numbers.[16]
Local-level surveys in Quang Tri provinces and A Luoi district released in
2003 (see “Surveys and Assessment” below) indicate that, when the
type of ordnance was known, cluster bomblets or “bombies” (BLU
26/36) accounted for 50 percent of incidents in Quang Tri and 52 percent in A
Luoi, M-79 mortar shells accounted for 14 percent in Quang Tri and 26 percent in
A Luoi, and antipersonnel mines accounted for 11 percent in Quang Tri and 12
percent in A Luoi.[17] Cluster
bombs caused 80 percent of the incidents responded to by Clear Path
International’s rapid response team in the same two provinces in 2002 and
the first quarter of 2003.[18]
Antipersonnel landmines are concentrated around military installations, near
the former Demilitarized Zone, and in border areas. Minefields and areas of
heavy UXO contamination near populated areas are more likely to have been
cleared since the end of the war, while affected areas in mountainous or remote
regions have often been left untouched.
Survey data shows that residents of Quang Tri and Thua Thien-Hue provinces
have encountered landmines and UXO most frequently while gathering firewood,
farming or tending livestock, and near
homes.[19] Up to 35 percent of
local land in Quang Tri cannot be used for cultivation or
settlement.[20] Twenty-five
percent of Quang Tri survey respondents said that contamination limits access to
farmland, and 20 percent said that mines and UXO make movement or travel
difficult.[21] In A Luoi
district, Thua Thien-Hue, 35 percent of interviewees did not use parcels of land
due to contamination or perceived
contamination.[22]
Vietnam’s rapid economic growth is bringing more and more of the
population in closer proximity to affected areas. Urban expansion in Ho Chi
Minh City, Hanoi, Danang and elsewhere is now entering areas that were military
perimeter zones during wartime. More significantly, previously remote and
heavily affected rural areas are becoming accessible with the construction of
new roads such as the 1,676-kilometer Ho Chi Minh Highway along Vietnam’s
western border. With about half of the length of the highway near completion
and scheduled for opening in September 2003, tens of thousands of migrants and
settlers are expected to move onto land adjacent to the road in order to seek a
living. However, military clearance extends only along the roadbed itself;
those who attempt to clear land on either side of the road for fields or houses
do so at their own risk.[23]
Surveys and Assessments
The Vietnamese army, Ministry of Health, and
Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) have all gathered
internal data on landmine-related subjects. While some of the conclusions of
these surveys have been released regarding the total land area affected by mines
and UXO, or the total number of deaths and injuries since 1975, details and
survey methodologies are rarely made public, and the accuracy of the data is
unknown.
Groundbreaking local mine impact assessment surveys were completed in 2002
and early 2003 in three districts of the central provinces of Quang Tri and Thua
Thien-Hue. Canada-based Hatfield Consultants conducted a survey in partnership
with the 10-80 Committee, an office of Vietnam’s Ministry of Health known
for its research on toxic chemicals such as Agent Orange. Funding was provided
by the Canadian development agency CIDA.
Data collection began in A Luoi district, Thua Thien-Hue, in 2001 and covered
mine and UXO contamination, casualties, levels of mine awareness, as well as the
impact of mines, UXO and chemicals on human health and socio-economic
activities. Questionnaires for portions of the survey were adapted from the
landmine impact survey in Laos conducted by Handicap International in 1997. The
final Hatfield report, released in January 2003, employs wartime US bombing
records and geospatial remote data sensing in combination with on-site
interviews.[24]
The Hatfield—10-80 Committee’s mine/UXO survey materials were
replicated in Thua Thien-Hue’s Phong Dien district, where Australian
Volunteers International began a UXO clearance and community development project
in January 2002, funded by AusAID, with technical training and support from MAG.
The Phong Dien survey, carried out entirely by district government staff and
completed in March 2003, interviewed mine/UXO survivors, their families, and
village elders.[25]
In Quang Tri province, Project RENEW, a joint initiative of the provincial
government and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund (VVMF), carried out a mine
impact assessment survey in Trieu Phong district in September 2002. RENEW then
implemented two province-wide surveys together with UNICEF and the provincial
health department, one on “KAP” (Knowledge, Awareness, and
Practices) and the second on casualties. Interviews were conducted in 12,000
households, using International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) for 2001. Funding
for the surveys, totaling US$35,000, was granted by UNICEF, the Freeman
Foundation, and Christos Cotsakis of
E-Trade.[26] Results of these
surveys, as well as the Trieu Phong district survey, will be officially released
in June 2003.
The most extensive survey proposed for Vietnam, a nationwide Landmine Impact
Survey, has been under negotiation since December
2000.[27] In January 2003, a
breakthrough was reached when the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation and
BOMICO signed a memorandum of
understanding.[28] The project
document and budget, however, must still be approved by the Minister of Defense,
the Prime Minister, and other relevant ministries before implementation can take
place. VVAF believes that these steps will be completed by the middle or end of
2003.[29] The US State
Department has committed to funding US$6 million for the
survey.[30]
The first phase of the survey is authorized to gather data in three central
provinces (Quang Tri, Quang Binh, and Ha Tinh). Extension to other provinces in
the future will depend on review of this phase by Vietnamese authorities, VVAF
and the US donors.[31] Data
collection will be implemented by BOMICO and matched with US archival bombing
data. Given that the UNICEF and RENEW surveys have already collected much of
this information in Quang Tri, VVAF hopes to adapt existing survey materials to
fit the standard forms.[32]
Coordination and Planning
2002 saw no movement towards coordination on a
national level. The Ministry of Defense continues to play the leading role in
mine action.[33] BOMICO is
responsible for surveys and research on landmines and UXO, demining technology
and equipment, and mine/UXO clearance. The company may enter into international
agreements with the permission of the Minister of
Defense.[34] But it is not set
up to be a national coordinator for foreign-funded projects.
On the provincial level, authorities in Quang Tri are seeking permission to
open a “landmine coordination center,” which might become a model
for other provinces to follow. The US Department of Defense has sent two teams
to Quang Tri to look at sites for a possible
center.[35]
At present, Quang Tri provincial authorities coordinate and manage
international partnerships in clearance, mine risk education, economic
assistance and survivor assistance among five districts. In all, 20 Vietnamese
organizations, including the Women’s Union, Youth Union, and Committee for
Population, Family and Children, are “working as well as learning”
with international agencies, making their work more professional. As a result,
the Quang Tri foreign relations office was granted national-level status in
early 2003.[36]
Several NGOs have encountered difficulties in expanding their operations from
one province to another—even an adjacent one. Since this requires
negotiating a new project agreement with authorities in the second province from
scratch, it can be almost as challenging as moving to a new
country.[37]
Mine/UXO Clearance
Military Clearance
The People’s Army of Vietnam is the primary
agency involved in clearance. Anyone who finds landmines or UXO on their
property or worksite may contact the district-level military unit. Larger or
more demanding clearance activities are conducted by the Army’s
Engineering Command or associated commercial military mine clearance companies
such as Truong Son and Lung
Lo.[38] BOMICO also conducts
contract demining, as well as taking responsibility for training, standards,
equipment development, surveys, statistics and research under the Engineering
Command.[39]
Military companies and units charge from 18-20 million dong (US$1,170-1,300)
per hectare to clear lightly contaminated areas, up to 40-50 million dong
(US$2,600-3,250) for heavily contaminated
land.[40]
According to Sr. Col. Bui Minh Tam, director of BOMICO, government-sponsored
mine clearance focuses on the objectives of supporting agricultural expansion,
housing construction and large scale infrastructure projects. In agricultural
settings, clearance is done on the surface and to a depth of 0.3 meters only,
whereas in other areas clearance is done to greater depths consistent with the
requirements of follow-up activities such as construction. From 1975 to 2002,
Sr. Col. Tam states that 1,200 million square meters have been cleared of 4
million landmines and 8 million UXO. No year-by-year figures are
available.[41]
Clearance in border areas is conducted both by military units and border
guard demining teams. The first phase of border clearance was completed in the
1990s; a second, more detailed phase is
underway.[42] In Lai Chau and
Lang Son provinces along the Chinese border the ribbon of land along the border
itself has already been cleared, while demining is currently underway in valleys
and alongside approaches to border
crossings.[43]
The largest military demining project in recent years has been part of the
construction of the Ho Chi Minh Highway through the mountains of central
Vietnam. The road has cost US$500 million to build; US$10 million, or 2
percent, of that has been spent on clearing UXO, far in excess of the amount
budgeted.[44] In the section of
road from Ha Tinh to Kon Tum provinces alone, newspapers reported in April 2002
that 20,000 bombs had been found at depths up to 10
meters.[45] Other current
military demining projects include bridges and road-widening along Highways 1A
and 9 and along the Lao
border.[46]
In 2002, military clearance teams were used extensively in construction
activities, including in support of international companies, such as the Nestle
factory in Ho Chi Minh City and a British Petroleum pipeline in Ba Ria-Vung Tau
province.[47] For one severely
contaminated site in Quang Tri where the province is planning to construct a
cassava-processing plant, the authorities hired an international demining agency
rather than the provincial
army.[48]
International Organizations
Five international organizations engaged in site clearance in 2002 in Quang
Tri and Thua Thien-Hue provinces. Since the first internationally-funded
project began in 1996, 6.57 million square meters of land in Quang Tri have been
cleared of 35,000 mines and UXO; a total of 1.6 million square meters of land
have been cleared in 2002 and the first three months of
2003.[49] In 2002, 634,950
square meters of land were cleared in Thua
Thien-Hue.[50]
The British NGO, Mines Advisory Group (MAG), with 150 local staff and seven
expatriate advisors, is the largest of the international clearance agencies. In
2002, MAG completed a two and a half year project clearing 150 hectares on one
site in Gio Linh district. It was initially funded by the Danish aid agency
DANIDA, then by Adopt-A-Minefield and the Freeman Foundation. Work then began on
four new sites totaling 165 hectares in Hai Lang district, Quang Tri, funded by
Adopt-A-Minefield and other donors. In November 2002, MAG signed a US$639,000
agreement to clear 80 hectares in Le Thuy district. MAG also signed a $620,000
two-year agreement with the Province to operate a Provincial Mobile UXO
clearance team. It is also providing technical assistance to the
Australian-funded Mobile UXO clearance team that is beginning operations in
Phong Dien district, Thua Thien-Hue in 2003. Unlike other MAG activities, the
Australian Volunteers International project involves a group of military
deminers.[51]
Also expanding their activities in 2002 were two German NGOs,
Solidaritaetsdienst International (SODI) in Quang Tri and Potsdam Kommunikation
(PK) in Thua Thien-Hue. Both manage integrated mine action, awareness and
resettlement projects. In the clearance portion of their work, specialists from
the German demining company, GERBERA, supervise clearance and training of
Vietnamese deminers.[52] SODI
completed clearance of two sites totaling 4.13 million square meters in Cam Lo
and Trieu Phong districts, Quang Tri, in December 2002. PK began clearance in
May 2002 on 750,000 square meters of land in Phu Bai and Thuy Phu communes, Thua
Thien-Hue.[53] By the end of
the year, it had cleared 614,950 square
meters.[54] Funding for these
projects, an average of US$300,000-$500,000 per year each for SODI and PK, comes
from the German Federal Foreign Office and the German Ministry of Economic
Cooperation.[55]
The American NGO Clear Path International completed clearance of the last
12,500 square meters of a 435,000 square meters tract in Dong Ha town, Quang Tri
in June 2002. The US$700,000 project, funded by the Freeman Foundation and
contracted with the commercial demining group, UXB International, stood on a
portion of the former “McNamara Fence” south of the
DMZ.[56] Another American
organization, PeaceTrees Vietnam, cleared 60,000 square meters in
2002.[57] The land forms part
of a Friendship Village in Dong Ha that PeaceTrees dedicated in September
2002.[58]
There is an increasing emphasis on mobile clearance. MAG began its mobile
team in Gio Linh district, Quang Tri, in 2001, moving operations to Hai Lang
district in May 2002. The two six-person teams go house to house, clearing
200-300 items per week. In Quang Binh, MAG began operating a mobile team in
Dong Hoi district in May
2003.[59] SODI teams involved
in both small clearance and awareness activities began in April 2002 in Cam Lo
and Trieu Phong districts, Quang
Tri.[60] Potsdam Kommunikation
began “ad-hoc” mobile team operations around Thua Thien-Hue province
in 2002 and plans to add a permanent mobile team of one German and five
Vietnamese experts to its integrated project across the province in July
2003.[61] Other groups with
plans to introduce mobile teams later in 2003 include Project RENEW and
Australian Volunteers
International.[62]
Resettlement and Use of Cleared Land
All of the international organizations working in central Vietnam include
plans for post-clearance land use in their projects. SODI resettled 100
families in a new village in Trieu Phong district, Quang Tri, building a new
primary school, water and electricity
systems.[63] An additional
1,000 families will be resettled on 1.1 million square meters of cleared land in
Cam Lo district, where SODI is constructing two resettlement
villages.[64] In September
2002, PeaceTrees Vietnam dedicated its Friendship Village in Dong Ha town, Quang
Tri, on the site of a former US Marine combat base. The US$300,000 project
provides housing for 100 disadvantaged
families.[65]
On the Gio Linh district site cleared by MAG, 1 million square meters have
been transferred to local families, with 78 houses built at a cost of 24 million
dong (US$1,560) each. This resettlement zone was officially inaugurated in
March 2003 and marks the first phase of an environmental rehabilitation project
that will include roads, irrigation networks, power supply, schools, and medical
aid stations.[66] Plan
International will undertake a similar role, partnering with MAG, in
post-clearance construction in Le Thuy district, Quang Binh, which began in May
2003.[67]
In Thua Thien-Hue province, Potsdam Kommunikation gathered donations to build
a kindergarten and school and provides direct support to 35 poor families in
Duong Hoa commune, where clearance was completed in 2002. PK’s
resettlement activities are planned at least one year in advance based on
project partners’ priorities and clearance conducted in different
areas.[68]
Mine/UXO Risk Education
At the central level, the Vietnamese government
carries out mine and UXO risk education as part of a national injury prevention
program. The National Steering Committee on Accident and Injury Prevention,
based at the Ministry of Health, was formed in 2001. It also includes members
from government-sponsored mass organizations such as the Women’s Union and
Youth Union. A national conference on injury prevention funded by UNICEF took
place in September 2002.[69] In
2003-2005, the steering committee plans to expand programs on injury prevention,
including mine/UXO risk education, in schools and communities nationwide, with
support from UNICEF and the World Health Organization. In addition, the
committee plans to carry out a detailed injury survey in six provinces,
including Quang Tri and Thua Thien-Hue in late
2003.[70]
Certain mass organizations also hold mine/UXO risk education programs of
their own in heavily affected areas. Most of these efforts are targeted at
children. The Quang Tri provincial Committee for the Care and Protection of
Children organizes art programs, games and contests to remind children to be
vigilant about the dangers of bombs and
mines.[71]
UNICEF began a nationwide mine/UXO risk education program in January 2002 in
partnership with the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Education and Training
through the mass media and at community level school-based programs. Activities
include implementing a school curriculum in 15 provinces, translating materials
from other countries, and producing UXO/mine marking signs, as well as advocacy
at the national level. The US$250,000 program concludes at the end of
2003.[72]
Project RENEW broadcast three documentary films on landmines and UXO on
provincial television in 2002 as well as 14 rotating weekly public service
announcements, each of them aimed at a specific high-risk group such as farmers,
children and scrap metal dealers. The group’s 2002 mine awareness budget
of US$58,000 was funded by UNICEF and private
donors.[73]
Catholic Relief Services’ pilot project with the Quang Tri Education
Department to introduce a landmine/UXO awareness primary school curriculum in
five communes of Trieu Phong, Quang Tri plans to expand province-wide. In 2002, the project benefited 200 teachers and 4,050 children, with an
annual budget of US$155,000.[74]
PeaceTrees Vietnam conducts teacher training for mine risk education with the
Women’s Union and at libraries in Quang Tri, providing training for more
than 2,000 people in 2002.[75]
SODI combines awareness activities with its EOD teams in Cam Lo and Trieu Phong
districts, and has reached 5,000 students to
date.[76]
Potsdam Kommunikation began a province-wide community awareness program in
Thua Thien-Hue in 2002, with a focus on visiting schools in Huong Thuy district
where clearance was underway. This team conducts awareness activities in
coordination with the provincial Women’s Union and Youth
Union.[77] Vietnam Assistance
for the Handicapped began a two-year mine risk education project in Quang Binh
and Thanh Hoa provinces in April 2002, in cooperation with provincial
Departments of Labor, War Invalids and Social
Affairs.[78]
Survey data and evaluation results from a number of the above-mentioned
programs were released in 2002 and early 2003 and give an indication of the
level of mine/UXO awareness among the general public and the effectiveness of
awareness-raising activities. Ninety-three percent of survey respondents in
Quang Tri are aware that mines cause death or injury. Ten percent see UXO or
mines on a daily or weekly basis, 17 percent at least once a month, and 44
percent at least once per year. But few place warning signs in the ground
(15%); most simply leave the area without telling others (41%), while 35 percent
tell local authorities.[79]
The most effective means of raising awareness appears to be television, which
according to surveys in Quang Tri reaches up to 95 percent of the population.
Second come programs that target schools, reaching 17-19 percent, with
community-based outreach in third
place.[80] CRS has found a 38
percent decrease in the number of scrap metal collectors operating in two
communes where its school project is taking place, and attributes this change to
children influencing the behavior of their
parents.[81] UNICEF, likewise,
cites a “strong correlation between the introduction of quality UXO/mine
risk education activities and the reduction of UXO/mine related
injuries.”[82] Hoang Dang
Mai of the Quang Tri Foreign Relations Department agrees that “people act
more confidently and safely in affected areas than in the
past.”[83]
Mine Action Funding
Vietnam has no published national budget for mine
action, but official sources state that the government invests “hundreds
of billions of dong (tens of millions of US dollars) for mine detection and
clearance” each year.[84]
The Ministry of Defense estimates that complete clearance would cost $4 billion,
plus $1 billion more for survivor assistance
needs.[85]
Total US humanitarian mine action funding to Vietnam was $3.638 million in US
fiscal year 2002.[86] The US
State Department’s Humanitarian Demining Program provided US$1.5 million
for mine clearance equipment. The donation, given through BOMICO, included
Minelab F1A4 detectors, personal protection equipment, deep metal detectors,
unexploded ordnance disposal tools, blast trauma medical kits, vehicles, and
underwater demining
equipment.[87] The US Defense
Department contributed an estimated $638,000, and the USAID Leahy War Victims
Fund contributed $1.5 million. The Leahy War Victims Fund has provided $16
million to people with disabilities in Vietnam since
1991.[88]
Japan’s aid agency JICA provided the People’s Army of Vietnam
with US$866,000 for purchase of mine clearance
equipment.[89] This was part of
a total US$12 million pledge made by Japan in April 2002 for assistance in
clearing mines and UXO along the route of the Ho Chi Minh
Highway.[90]
International NGOs working in mine action and survivor assistance received
funds from bilateral, multilateral, and private sources in 2002. AusAID
provided US$650,000 to Australian Volunteers International’s integrated
demining/community development program in Phong Dien district, Thua Thien-Hue in
2002.[91] Germany contributed
US$519,000 to Potsdam Kommunikation and US$585,000 to SODI in
2002.[92] Other bilateral
donors reportedly included Canada, Luxembourg, Ireland, and the United
Kingdom.[93]
UNICEF began funding its own mine awareness program in January 2002 and also
funded the Project RENEW survey in Quang Tri province.
Regarding private funding, international NGOs received grants in 2002 from 14
foundations and charitable
donors.[94] The largest private
donor was the US-based Freeman Foundation, which supports the work of Clear Path
International, MAG, PeaceTrees Vietnam, Project RENEW, and Vietnam Assistance to
the Handicapped.
Landmine/UXO Casualties
There is no comprehensive mechanism for collecting
and recording data on mine/UXO casualties in Vietnam. In 2002, a media report
indicated that 66 people had been killed and 100 injured in mine/UXO incidents
during the year.[95] However,
BOMICO estimates that 1,110 people are killed and 1,882 injured every year
“on average,”[96]
but no data is provided to support this figure. Landmine Monitor’s
independent survey of the domestic media recorded 73 mine/UXO incidents
resulting in 67 people killed and 86 injured in
2002.[97] These figures only
include incidents reported in the media, not additional mine/UXO incidents known
to local mine action organizations. In 2001, according to one media report, 97
people were killed and 140 injured in mine/UXO
incidents.[98]
Clear Path International estimates that 85 percent of mine/UXO incidents in
Quang Tri and Thua Thien-Hue provinces are reported, but far fewer in other
provinces, particularly in remote and mountainous areas. CPI responded to 16
incidents in Quang Tri alone during the first quarter of 2003, 70 percent in
remote Da Krong and Huong Hoa
districts.[99] Only two of the
16 incidents were mentioned in the national press.
The Quang Tri survey results indicate that half of all survivors were injured
as children, while in the Thua Thien-Hue surveys children comprise a smaller
proportion of casualties. Project RENEW found that the largest group of
casualties (44 percent) in Trieu Phong district, Quang Tri, was between the ages
of 16 and 30, and 80 percent of all casualties are
male.[100]
Data on casualties from local surveys released in 2002-2003 demonstrate a
clear reduction in mine/UXO incidents over time. In Quang Tri province, the
decline has been as much as 45-50 percent since the mid-1990s. Provincial
authorities attribute the improvement to a combination of having fewer mines and
UXO in the ground and increased
awareness.[101]
The Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Foreign Affairs claim to have no
reports of casualties among military deminers on road projects or border areas
in 2002,[102] although
accidents have been reported in the
past.[103] One military deminer
was injured on a Potsdam Kommunikation clearance site in Hue in September
2002.[104]
The latest available nationwide figures from the Ministry of Labor, Invalids
and Social Affairs (MOLISA), dated 31 December 2000, report 38,849 people killed
and 65,852 injured since
1975.[105]This
represents an increase of 601 people killed and 1,788 injured since the May 1998
figures cited in previous Landmine Monitor
reports.[106]
Casualties continue to be reported in 2003. Landmine Monitor’s media
survey recorded 18 mine/UXO incidents resulting in 16 people killed and 26
injured in the first quarter of 2003.
Survivor Assistance
Landmine/UXO survivors are likely to be poorer
than the median income in provinces that are already well below the national
average. For example, 60 percent of Quang Tri survivors have “poverty
cards” identifying them as below the national poverty line. Almost
one-third of families with mine/UXO survivors live on 5,000 dong (US$0.30) or
less per day, and 90 percent live in substandard housing. The unemployment rate
of mine/UXO survivors is 3.5 times higher than before they were
injured.[107]
In a UNICEF survey, 96 percent of survivors in Quang Tri and their families
state that they have not received any external support to date. The remaining
four percent have received assistance from either NGOs, government, or both.
The top priority for 80 percent of respondents was for financial assistance,
either in the form of grants or loans. Only two percent list rehabilitation,
prosthetics, or orthotics as their top priority, although it may be a secondary
need.[108]
In Vietnam, medical and health care services are provided by the national
Ministry of Health at the province, district, and commune levels, and
rehabilitation services are provided by the Ministry of Health and the Ministry
of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs (MOLISA). No distinction is made in
treatment and rehabilitation services for landmine and UXO survivors. In
practice, most international NGOs working on disability issues also do not make
a distinction between landmine/UXO survivors and other persons with
disabilities.[109]
Vietnamese Providers of Mine/UXO Survivor Assistance
Adequate health care and rehabilitative services for landmine and UXO
survivors exists in Vietnam. However, survivors face obstacles of location and
cost in accessing these services. Most mine and UXO incidents happen far from
provincial centers where medical facilities are concentrated. The central
region, in particular, is underserved.
The Phong Dien survey found that 51 percent of survivors received medical
care at the provincial hospital, 33 percent at the district health center, and
14 percent at commune clinics. The other two percent received no formal medical
care.[110] Phong Dien’s
coastal location and proximity to Hue is a positive factor in access to medical
care. Casualties occurring in more remote districts are unlikely to match these
results.
Basic health care for mine/UXO survivors who possess “poverty
cards” or who are veterans of the (North) Vietnamese army is provided free
of charge. A health insurance program for people with disabilities covers only
one percent of the total estimated disabled
population.[111] Others pay
fees that, while small by international standards, may represent significant
costs for survivors and their families.
Rehabilitation facilities provide services for all people with disabilities,
regardless of cause. Tracking statistics of people assisted is difficult, as
most hospitals in Vietnam do not have electronic
databases.[112]
In addition to medical rehabilitation facilities, Vietnam possesses a network
of outreach and community-based rehabilitation services in 45 out of 61
provinces. According to the Ministry of Health, this system has trained 120
central-level professionals, 550 rehabilitation technicians and trainers on the
provincial and district levels, and 10,000 community workers and volunteers.
The ministry’s strategy calls for extending community-based services
nationwide by 2020.[113]
There are 17 official centers providing prosthetics and orthotics nationwide,
but none functioning in the four heavily-affected provinces between Nghe An and
Da Nang.[114] At present, new
mine/UXO survivors from all over the central provinces are sent to Danang, where
facilities are considered to be
superior.[115] An agreement by
the American NGO, Vietnam Assistance for the Handicapped (VNAH), to open a
prosthetic clinic in the politically sensitive Central Highlands was signed in
2002 but later rejected.[116]
Vietnam produces an estimated 20,000 prosthetic and orthotic devices per year
at more than 20 public and private centers. Most of these are made at centers
operated by MOLISA and its provincial sub-departments or DOLISAs. With 230
trained technicians nationwide each able to produce up to 500 devices annually,
this results in considerable excess
capacity.[117] The main problem
is distribution and affordability.
The prosthetic/orthotic center at the provincial hospital in Quang Tri used
to be one of the leading prosthetic providers in the country. However, Handicap
International Belgium (HIB) ended its program there in 2001, and now the
workshop only produces about three orthopedic devices per
month.[118] The province
receives funding from the Ministry of Health to provide basic medical care, but
none for assistive devices.[119]
HIB had initially planned for the clinic to operate independently on a
“cost-recovery system,” whereby wealthier patients subsidize the
poor, as is done in Ho Chi Minh City and elsewhere in the
country.[120] A consortium of
other international NGOs is considering options to restart services at the
center.
Prosthetic and orthotic devices are not included in national health programs,
but are available from internationally-funded and private rehabilitation centers
for those who can reach them. For survivors in A Luoi district, the 10-80
Committee calculates the cost of transportation to Hue at about US$30 and an
average operation between
US$650-950.[121] Those who
cannot afford these costs, or are even further away from public rehabilitation
facilities, have no choice but to seek local care and then purchase prostheses
on the private market. The going rate for a poor-quality prosthetic leg along
the Chinese border is 500,000 dong (US$32.50) for a below-knee device and
1,000,000 dong (US$65) for an above-knee
model.[122] Homemade devices
are also frequently seen in other areas of the country, particularly far from
urban centers. Most are of low quality and
uncomfortable.[123]
International Programs for Mine/UXO Survivor Assistance
The ICRC continues to be the lead international organization assisting
mine/UXO survivors. Its centers in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang supply
polypropylene components for making orthopedic devices nationwide. On 30
December 2002, the ICRC, MOLISA and the Vietnam Red Cross (VNRC) signed a
tripartite agreement to provide 3,460 prosthetic limbs in 2003 in the central
and southern provinces of Da Nang, Can Tho, Binh Dinh, Nghe An, Thanh Hoa, Kon
Tum, and Ho Chi Minh City. The VNRC is assigned to identify amputees in need of
services.[124] In 2002, the
ICRC covered costs for 1,900 prostheses for amputees in Ho Chi Minh City, Da
Nang, and Can Tho and over 200 at other locations. In Ho Chi Minh City center,
which serves 12 southern provinces, 1,857 prostheses were produced, of which
1,125 were for mine/UXO
survivors.[125] In Da Nang, 544
prostheses were produced and in Can Tho, 519 prostheses were
produced.[126] The number
produced for mine/UXO survivors was not available, though the ICRC is aware of
“3-6 persons that were mine victims and had never been fitted since 1973
due to the confusion in the last days before
unification.”[127] Two
students from Ho Chi Minh center completed their three-year training program at
the MOLISA Orthopedic School of Hanoi. The program is funded by the ICRC
Special Fund for the
Disabled.[128]
The American Red Cross carries out disability projects in 10 provinces with
the VNRC. These projects assist some mine/UXO survivors, but no specific
records have been kept to date. The ARC plans to provide technical assistance
on record keeping to the VNRC as part of the
program.[129]
Vietnam Assistance to the Handicapped (VNAH) provides assistance to five
rehabilitation centers in Can Tho, Ho Chi Minh City, Binh Dinh, Da Nang and Ha
Tay provinces/cities. VNAH does not keep records of landmine/UXO survivors
assisted and its country director estimates that fewer than 12 new survivors
received prosthetic services in
2002.[130] In addition, VNAH
donated 2,500 wheelchairs, tricycles and artificial limbs worth a total of
$300,000 to disabled veterans nationwide in 2002. Funding is provided by the
US-based Freeman
Foundation.[131]
Clear Path International has permission to send its emergency response teams
to respond to new landmine/UXO incidents in six central provinces. Teams
investigate the site, pay medical bills and cover rehabilitation costs as
necessary. In 2001-2002, CPI provided medical and social support to 290
survivors and family
members.[132] CPI’s
comprehensive program of mine action and survivor assistance in Dong Ha town,
Quang Tri was completed in June 2002. A similar project in Vinh Linh district,
north of the former DMZ, is ongoing. CPI’s latest expansion is a
memorandum of understanding with Quang Binh, where emergency teams will work
with VNAH to provide wheelchairs and medical devices and establish a
comprehensive project in Le Thuy
district.[133]
The American NGO, Kids First, provides assistance to survivors in Quang Tri
through a scholarship program for poor youth, including 100 students who have
war-related disabilities. The average level of support is US$50 annually per
person. Kids First also funded the construction of Song Hieu Primary School in
Dong Ha town, the nation’s first school that is fully accessible for the
disabled. On 1 March 2003, construction began on the US$2.268 million Kids
First Rehabilitation Village in Quang Tri, which will train disadvantaged and
disabled young people in business skills, information technology, hospitality,
woodwork, metalwork and agriculture. The village will establish partnerships
with other NGOs to meet the medical and vocational needs of mine/UXO survivors
and other war disabled.[134]
Project RENEW has a survivor assistance component to their mine action
program in Quang Tri province. As part of the program, RENEW is providing first
aid training specific to mine/UXO casualties. RENEW also works with mine/UXO
survivors throughout Trieu Phong District to design creative programs to
reintegrate survivors back into the workforce. Project RENEW has trained 245
emergency medical staff and helped 50 families of landmine/UXO survivors start
mushroom production.[135]
In January 2003, Landmine Survivors Network signed a two-year agreement with
the People’s Committee of Bo Trach district, Quang Binh province, to
assist mine/UXO survivors and other amputees. LSN plans to gather information
about the situation of survivors in the district and apply a self-help peer
support model, adapted to Vietnamese
conditions.[136]
Disability Policy and Practice
The government’s Ordinance on Disabled
Persons has been in effect since 10 July
1999.[137] On 22 January 2001,
MOLISA established a National Coordinating Council on Disabilities (NCCD), which
includes representatives of 20 government agencies, with a six-person standing
committee.[138] At the province
and district level, local governments or People’s Committees have
management responsibilities for the “protection and care” of persons
with disabilities.[139]
However, significant inconsistencies remain to be addressed between policy
and practice. The ILO reports that of 14 targets set by the UNESCAP Decade of
Disabled Persons (1993-2002), Vietnam fully met only two and partially achieved
four others.[140] Health
insurance for the poor, for instance, is included as a provision of the 1998
Ordinance on Disabled Persons, but has not yet been
implemented.[141]
Vietnamese officials participated in the landmine victim assistance meeting
in Sri Lanka sponsored by UNMAS and CARE in March 2003. Staff from PACCOM,
Project RENEW, the Ministry of Education and Training, and the health division
of the Ministry of Defense attended the
meeting.[142]
[1] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu Tan,
Director of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Defense, 13 May
2003. [2] Interview with Ambassador
Nguyen Quy Binh, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 May
2003. [3] Andrew Wells-Dang,
“Vietnam Outlines New Priorities for International NGO Assistance,”
Interchange (Spring 2003).
http://www.ffrd.org/indochina/spring03news.html. [4]
Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu Tan, Ministry of Defense, 13 May
2003. [5] Vu Toan, “Rangers risk
their lives in poacher hunt,” Viet Nam News, 13 April
2003. [6] Vietnam News Service,
“Fish bombing blows up in locals’ faces,” 19 September
2002. [7] Dang Luu, “Where only
fools rush in,” Viet Nam News, 25 November
2002. [8] “Poor Locals Choose
Death-Trap Job for Living,” Tien Phong, 24 March 2003, p.
7. [9] Project RENEW and UNICEF, KAP
(Knowledge-Awareness-Practices) Survey,
forthcoming. [10] BOMICO, “Tinh
hinh o nhiem bom-min-vat no con sot lai sau chien tranh” (Situation on the
Effects of Landmines, Bombs and Explosives Remaining After the War), draft paper
provided by VVAF, 2003, p. 7. See also Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 778,
which cites the estimate of 16.478 million square meters of contaminated
land. [11] Sr. Col. Bui Minh Tam,
“Cuoc chien dau sau chien tranh” (The Struggle After the War), Su
kien & Nhan chung (monthly military magazine), date unknown, pp. 17, 31;
“Vietnam Demining Activities and Challenges” unpublished paper,
February 2002. [12] David Holdridge as
quoted in “Viet Nam, US organisations to co-operate on mine survey,”
Vietnam News Service, 29 January
2003. [13] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu
Tan, Ministry of Defense, 13 May
2003. [14] Interview with Nguyen Quang
Vinh, Director, and Amb. Nguyen Quy Binh, Vice-Director of the Boundaries
Committee, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hanoi, 16 May
2003. [15] Some of these incidents were
also reported by international newswires. For instance, “Vietnam War-Era
Bomb Kills 1 in Hanoi,” Associated Press, 21 March 2002; “Three die
in war-era bomb explosion in southern Vietnam,” Deutsche Presse-Agentur,
13 September 2002. [16] Landmine
Monitor’s independent survey found the most incidents in Phu Yen; An Ninh
Thu Do (newspaper), 20 December 2002, p. 2, cited Gia
Lai. [17] Jason Rush,
“Achievements of UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in 2002-3” report,
May 2003, p. 2; 10-80 Committee, “Results of UXO Presence and Victims
Survey in A Luoi,” 2001, pp.
34-35. [18] Presentation by Hugh Hosman,
Representative, Clear Path International, at the Landmine Working Group, Hanoi,
25 April 2003. [19] Project RENEW and
UNICEF, KAP (Knowledge-Awareness-Practices) Survey, forthcoming; 10-80
Committee, “Results of UXO Presence and Victims Survey in A Luoi,”
2001, pp. 15-16. [20] Cong An TP. Ho Chi
Minh (daily newspaper), 21 December 2002, p. 1; Nguoi Lao Dong (daily
newspaper), 16 December 2002, p. 4. [21]
Jason Rush, “Achievements of UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in
2002-3,” report, May 2003, p.
1. [22] Hatfield Consultants and 10-80
Committee, Developing Methodologies and Techniques for Supporting Clearance of
Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance in Vietnam, January 2003, p.
100. [23] Presentation by Hugh Hosman,
Representative, Clear Path International, and Nick Proudman, Program Manager,
Mines Advisory Group, at the Landmine Working Group, Hanoi, 17 January 2003;
communication from Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, 23 May
2003. [24] Hatfield Consultants and
10-80 Committee, Developing Methodologies and Techniques for Supporting
Clearance of Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance in Vietnam, January
2003. [25] Presentation by Brendan
Cantlon, Program Manager, Australian Volunteers International, at the Landmine
Working Group, Hanoi, 25 April
2003. [26] Interview with Chuck Searcy,
Representative, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 9 April 2003; Project RENEW,
“Report of Landmine/UXO Impact Survey in Trieu Phong District, Quang Tri
Province,” (draft), p. 10; interview with Nguyen Thi Van Anh, Associate,
Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 19 May
2003. [27] Landmine Monitor Report 2002,
pp. 778-779. [28] “Vietnam, US
veterans organisation agree on landmines survey,” Associated Press, 29
January 2003. [29] Presentation by Guy
Rhodes, Program Manager, VVAF, to the NGO Resource Center, Hanoi, 28 February
2003; communication from VVAF, 23 May
2003. [30] “US Department of State
Funds Survey of Vietnam's Landmine and Unexploded Ordnance Problem,” State
Department media release, 7 February
2003. [31] Communication from VVAF, 23
May 2003. [32] Presentation by Guy
Rhodes, Program Manager, VVAF, to the NGO Resource Center, Hanoi, 28 February
2003. [33] See Landmine Monitor Report
2002, p. 782. [34] Sr. Col. Bui Minh
Tam, “Cuoc chien dau sau chien tranh” (The Struggle After the War),
Su kien & Nhan chung (monthly military magazine), date unknown, pp. 17,
31. [35] Interview with Chuck Searcy,
Representative, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 9 April
2003. [36] Interview with Hoang Dang
Mai, Director, Quang Tri Province Foreign Relations Department, 17 April
2003. [37] Landmine Working Group
meeting, Hanoi, 25 January 2003; interviews in Quang Tri and Quang Binh, April
2003. [38] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu
Tan, Director of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Defense, 13 May
2003. [39] Communication from Vietnam
Veterans of America Foundation, 23 May
2003. [40] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu
Tan, Director of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Defense, 13 May 2003. The
director of BOMICO gave slightly different figures, ranging from 12-60 million
dong per hectare. Approximately 15,400 dong equals one US
dollar. [41] Sr. Col. Bui Minh Tam,
Director of BOMICO, “Vietnam Demining Activities and Challenges”
briefing paper, revised February
2002. [42] Interview with Nguyen Quang
Vinh, Director, and Amb. Nguyen Quy Binh, Vice-Director of the Boundaries
Committee, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hanoi, 16 May
2003. [43] “Ministry [of Foreign
Affairs] border delegation examines and works in Lai Chau and Lang Son
provinces,” Quoc Te (weekly newspaper), 24-30 April
2003. [44] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu
Tan, Director of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Defense, 13 May 2003;
communication from Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, 23 May
2003. [45] Tuoi Tre (Youth) daily
newspaper, 23 April 2002, p. 2; Quan Doi Nhan Dan (daily newspaper), 23 April
2002, p. 4; “An tuong Duong Ho Chi Minh hom nay” (Impressions of the
Ho Chi Minh Highway Today), Cong An Nhan Dan (daily newspaper), 31 October
2002. [46] Interview with Hoang Dang
Mai, Director, Quang Tri Province Foreign Relations Department, 17 April
2003. [47] Communication from VVAF, 23
May 2003. [48] Interview with Tran Khanh
Phoi, Quang Tri FRD coordinator for MAG Quang Tri projects, Mines Advisory
Group, Quang Tri, 18 April 2003. [49]
Provincial statistics cited by Hoang Nam, Coordinator, Project RENEW, Quang Tri,
17 April 2003. [50] Communication from
Lutz Vogt, Chairman, Potsdam Kommunikation, 25 June 2003; Hatfield Consultants
and 10-80 Committee, Developing Methodologies and Techniques for Supporting
Clearance of Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance in Vietnam, January 2003, pp.
111-113. [51] Email to Landmine Monitor
(HRW) from Tim Carstairs, Director for Policy, MAG, 22 July 2003; interview with
Tran Khanh Phoi, MAG, Quang Tri, 18 April
2003. [52] Communication from Ilona
Schleicher, SODI Project Manager, Berlin, 23 May 2003. In an October 2002 letter
to the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, GERBERA clarified that it
conducts no clearance or sub-contracting on its own in Vietnam and provides only
technical assistance to SODI and PK. This is a correction to Landmine Monitor
Report 2002, p. 781. [53] “German
government helps central province clear landmines,” Vietnam News Service,
8 May 2002. [54] Email from Lutz Vogt,
Chairman, Postdam Kommunikation, 25 June 2003. PK had a staff of 44
people. [55] Interview with Karl Heinz
Werther, Project Manager, SODI, Quang Tri, 17 April 2003; communication from
Lutz Vogt, Chairman, Potsdam Kommunikation, 21 May
2003. [56] “Cleared Mines Pave the
Way for Resettlement,” Vietnam News Service, 5 August 2002; Landmine
Working Group Profile Booklet, January 2003, p. 8; communication from Hugh
Hosman, CPI Country Director, 7 May
2003. [57] Communication from Chuck
Meadows, Executive Director, PeaceTrees Vietnam, 8 May
2003. [58] “US organisation brings
peace to a war-torn land,” Vietnam News Service, 24 September
2002. [59] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003, pp. 12-13; interview with Mick Raine, Technical
Advisor, MAG, Quang Binh, 21 April
2003. [60] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003, p. 11; interview with Karl Heinz Werther, Project
Manager, SODI/GERBERA, Quang Tri, 17 April
2003. [61] Communication from Lutz Vogt,
Chairman, Potsdam Kommunikation, 21 May
2003. [62] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003; Landmine Working Group, Hanoi, 25 April
2003. [63] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003, p.
11. [64] Tien Phong (daily newspaper), 7
January 2003, p. 2. [65] Vietnam News
Service, “US organisation brings peace to a war-torn land,” 24
September 2002. [66] Nguoi Lao Dong
(daily newspaper), 18 March 2003, p. 3; “Mine-clearance project frees land
for development,” Vietnam News Service, 24 June
2002. [67] Communication from Tran Van
Thong, Project Coordinator, Plan International, 28 April
2003. [68] “German government
helps central province clear landmines,” Vietnam News Service, 8 May 2002;
communication from Lutz Vogt, Chairman, Potsdam Kommunikation, 21 May
2003. [69] Interview with Tran Van
Thanh, Director, Quang Tri Health Department, 18 April
2003. [70] Presentation by Dr. Tran Ngoc
Lan, Department of Preventative Medicine, Ministry of Health, at the World Bank
Knowledge Forum, Hanoi, 15 May
2003. [71] “Children who’ve
never known war still suffering,” Vietnam News Service, 19 June
2002. [72] Interview with Jason Rush,
UXO/Mine Project Coordinator, UNICEF, 8 May 2003; Jason Rush,
“Achievements of UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in 2002-3,” report,
May 2003, pp. 4-5. [73] Interview with
Hoang Nam, Coordinator, Project RENEW, Quang Tri, 17 April 2003; interview with
Nguyen Thi Van Anh, Associate, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 19 May
2003. [74] Communication from Nguyen Thi
Le Khanh, Project Officer, Catholic Relief Services, 12 and 13 May
2003. [75] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003, pp. 16-17; communication from Chuck Meadows,
PeaceTrees Vietnam Executive Director, 12 May
2003. [76] Interview with Karl Heinz
Werther, Project Manager, SODI/GERBERA, Quang Tri, 17 April
2003. [77] Communication from Lutz Vogt,
Chairman, Potsdam Kommunikation, 21 May
2003. [78] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003, p. 27; VNAH and HealthEd Update, Fall
2002. [79] Project RENEW and UNICEF, KAP
(Knowledge-Awareness-Practices) Survey,
forthcoming. [80] Project RENEW,
“Report of Landmine/UXO Impact Survey in Trieu Phong District, Quang Tri
Province,” (draft), p. 41; Jason Rush, “Achievements of
UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in 2002-3” (report, May 2003), p.
2-3. [81] Presentation by Anat Prag, CRS
Education Program Manager, at the Landmine Working Group, Hanoi, 17 January
2003; presentation by CRS at Vietnam Innovation Day, Hanoi, 14 May
2003. [82] Jason Rush,
“Achievements of UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in 2002-3” (report,
May 2003), p. 2. [83] Interview with
Hoang Dang Mai, Director, Quang Tri Province Foreign Relations Department, 17
April 2003. [84] Sr. Col. Bui Minh Tam,
Director of BOMICO, “Vietnam Demining Activities and Challenges”
(briefing paper, revised February
2002). [85] Ibid. This calculation is
based on 8% of the country contaminated (=26,500 sq. km.) and the cost of
clearance per hectare at military
rates. [86] US Department of State,
“To Walk the Earth in Safety,” September
2002. [87] US Embassy press release,
“U.S. Humanitarian Demining Program Provides Mine Detectors to Vietnam's
Army,” 8 October 2002. [88]
Communication from Maj. Robb Etnyre, US Defense Attache Office, 5 May
2003. [89] Nhan Dan (daily newspaper), 1
November 2002, p. 8; Tin Tuc (News), 1 November 2002, p.
2. [90] Tuoi Tre (daily newspaper), 23
April 2002, p. 2; Quan Doi Nhan Dan (daily newspaper), 23 April 2002, p.
4. [91] “Australia Helps Locals
Escape from Legacy of War,” Lao Dong (daily newspaper), 10 December 2002,
p. 7; Nguoi Lao Dong (daily newspaper), 9 December 2002, p.
4. [92] See Germany country
report. [93] Landmine Working Group
Profile Booklet, January 2003. [94]
Ibid. [95] An Ninh Thu Do (daily
newspaper), 20 December 2002, p. 2. [96]
BOMICO, “Tinh hinh o nhiem bom-min-vat no con sot lai sau chien
tranh” (Situation on the Effects of Landmines, Bombs and Explosives
Remaining After the War), draft paper provided by VVAF, 2003, p.
7. [97] Full details of the media
reports are available from Landmine Monitor. In many cases, media reports were
vague about the precise cause of the incident, often listed as
“accident,” and the type of ordnance, often “bomb.”
[98] Dai Doan Ket Cuoi Tuan (Great
Solidarity Weekend Edition), 27 January 2002, p.
3. [99] Presentation by Hugh Hosman,
Representative, Clear Path International, at the Landmine Working Group, Hanoi,
25 April 2003. [100] Project RENEW,
“Report of Landmine/UXO Impact Survey in Trieu Phong District, Quang Tri
Province,” (draft), pp. 29,
32. [101] Interview with Hoang Dang Mai,
Director, Quang Tri Province Foreign Relations Department, 17 April
2003. [102] Interview with Lt. Gen. Vu
Tan, Director of Foreign Relations, Ministry of Defense, 13 May 2003; interview
with Nguyen Quang Vinh, Director, and Amb. Nguyen Quy Binh, Vice-Director of the
Boundaries Committee, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hanoi, 16 May
2003. [103] See Landmine Monitor Report
2002, p. 785. [104] Reported at the
Landmine Working Group, Hanoi, 25 April
2003. [105] BOMICO, “Tinh hinh o
nhiem bom-min-vat no con sot lai sau chien tranh” (Situation on the
Effects of Landmines, Bombs and Explosives Remaining After the War), draft paper
provided by Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, 2003, p.
7. [106] See Landmine Monitor Report
2001, p. 589. [107] Presentation by
Chuck Searcy, Representative, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, at the Landmine
Working Group, Hanoi, 17 January 2003; and Jason Rush, “Achievements of
UNICEF’s UXO/Mine Program in 2002-3,” May 2003, p.
4. [108] Project RENEW, “Report of
Landmine/UXO Impact Survey in Trieu Phong District, Quang Tri Province,”
(draft), pp. 37-38. [109] See Landmine
Monitor Report 2002, p. 785. [110] Data
from Phong Dien survey provided to Landmine Monitor, 13 May
2003. [111] “Viet Nam improves
quality of life for people with disabilities,” Viet Nam News, 18 April
2003. [112] Interview with Wilfried
Raab, Team Leader, VIETCOT, Hanoi, 16 May
2003. [113] Ministry of Health,
“Report from the National Workshop on Victim Assistance,” 25-26
September 2001, pp. 7-17. [114] There is
an orthotic workshop in the provincial hospital of Hue, supported by a French
NGO related to Proteor, and a workshop at the Quang Tri provincial hospital with
a small output of orthotic devices. Email from Patrick Le Folcalvez, Program
Director, HIB Vietnam, 10 July
2003. [115] Interview with Hugh Hosman,
Representative, Clear Path International, Quang Tri, 17 April
2003. [116] Interview with Larry Wolfe,
Country Director, Health Volunteers Overseas, Hanoi, 8 May 2003; and email from
Bui Van Toan, Country Director, VNAH, 27 May
2003. [117] Interview with Wilfried
Raab, Team Leader, VIETCOT, Hanoi, 16 May
2003. [118] Email from Patrick Le
Folcalvez, Program Director, HIB Vietnam, 10 July
2003. [119] Interview with Tran Van
Thanh, Director, Quang Tri Health Department, 18 April
2003. [120] Email from Patrick Le
Folcalvez, Vietnam Country Director, HI Belgium, 25 April
2003. [121] 10-80 Committee,
“Results of UXO Presence and Victims Survey in A Luoi,” 2001, pp.
37-8. [122] Interview with Nguyen Thu
Thao, Program Officer, VVAF, 16 May
2003. [123] Interview with Jason Rush,
UXO/Mine Project Coordinator, UNICEF, 20 May
2003. [124] ICRC, “The Orthopaedic
Programme, a MOLISA-VNRC-ICRC Tripartite Co-Operation in Vietnam”
(briefing paper, February 2003), p.
2. [125] Email from Peter Poetsma, ICRC
Representative, Ho Chi Minh City, 2 May
2003. [126] ICRC Special Fund for the
Disabled, “Annual Report 2002,” p.
8. [127] Email from Peter Poetsma, ICRC,
2 May 2003. [128] ICRC Special Fund for
the Disabled, “Annual Report 2002,” p.
8. [129] Presentation by Nguyen Minh
Huong, American Red Cross, to the Landmine Working Group, Hanoi, 25 April
2003. [130] Email from Bui Van Toan,
Country Director, VNAH, 27 May
2003. [131] Vietnam News Service, 25
March 2003, p. 3; Lao Dong (Labor), 24 March 2003, p. 3; and VNAH and HealthEd
Update, Fall 2002. [132] Presentation by
Hugh Hosman, Representative, Clear Path International, at the Landmine Working
Group, Hanoi, 17 January 2003. [133]
Interview with Hugh Hosman, Representative, Clear Path International, Quang Tri,
17 April 2003. [134] Hoai Nam,
“Village puts disabled kids first,” Viet Nam News, 5 March
2003. [135] Interview with Hoang Nam,
Coordinator, Project RENEW, Quang Tri, 17 April 2003; see also Landmine Monitor
Report 2002, p. 785. [136] Interview
with Michelle Hecker and Joelle Caschera, LSN, Quang Binh, 21 April
2003. [137] For more detail see Landmine
Monitor Report 2001, p. 591. [138]
Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 787; and International Labor Organization,
Vietnam Country Study, pp. 30-1. [139]
Article 16 of Implementation Decree 55/1999/ND-CP (10 July
1999). [140] International Labor
Organization, Vietnam Country Study, pp.
49-52. [141] Interview with Tran Van
Thanh, Director, Quang Tri Health Department, 18 April
2003. [142] Presentation by Dang Hoang
Linh, PACCOM, at the Landmine Working Group meeting, Hanoi, 25 April 2003;
interview with Duong Trong Hue, Project RENEW, Quang Tri, 17 April
2003.