Key developments
since March 1999: Canada continued to exercise a lead role internationally
in promoting universalization and effective implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty. It played a crucial role in the success of the First Meeting of States
Parties and the intersessional work program. Canada contributed $16.7 million
to mine action programs in its FY 1999/2000. The private Canadian Landmine
Foundation was established.
Mine Ban Policy
Canada was the first nation to sign the ban
convention on 3 December 1997 and was one of only three countries to deposit its
instrument of ratification with the UN Secretary General on the same day. Its
Implementation Act, passed by Parliament on 27 November 1997, entered into force
on 1 March 1999, as did the Mine Ban Treaty
internationally.[1] A
description and analysis of the Act were provided in Landmine Monitor Report
1999.[2]
The Mine Ban Treaty serves as a central reference point in Canadian foreign
policy, particularly with respect to its efforts to promote and institutionalize
the concept of human security, which it did, for example, within the United
Nations Security Council, where it is serving a two-year term ending 31 December
2000. Foreign Minister Lloyd Axworthy describes human security as an approach
by governments that places the protection and well-being of individuals as the
main criterion for international action. In virtually every official address or
speaking engagement, which deals with Canada's human security agenda, Minister
Axworthy refers to the Mine Ban Treaty as an example.
Government representatives frequently refer to the MBT as a model by which
other issues emphasized in Canadian foreign policy may be advanced. Repeatedly,
it and the contributions of civil society have been linked in official
statements to human security, small arms and the role of the United Nations
Security Council. Both domestically and internationally, the MBT is described
as going beyond the elimination of mines, raising the profile of threats to
human safety while providing a concrete example of how to advance the concept of
human security.[3]
The appointment of an Ambassador for Mine Action in 1998 plus the creation of
a new division within the Ministry specifically to work on landmines, the Mine
Action Team (ILX), were intended not only to move the treaty process forward,
but also to ensure that “Canada is able to continue to provide
international leadership on the landmines
issue.”[4]
FMSP
Canada played a crucial role in the organization of the First Meeting of
States Parties (FMSP) held in Maputo, Mozambique. It seconded a full-time staff
person from its Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
(ILX-DFAIT) to the FMSP secretariat in Mozambique for almost three months to
assist with logistics and conference planning. From within Canada, staff worked
to emphasize the importance of the FMSP to other states, describing the
conference as a "key step" in the entrenchment of the MBT. A large contingent
of Canadian officials, including Minister Axworthy, was present during the
Meeting. All federal political parties and the Mines Action Canada coalition
were represented on the Canadian delegation. ILX officials and staff helped to
conceptualize and were vocal proponents of the Convention's intersessional work
program. They also played a key role in developing and promoting the Article 7
Transparency Report formats, as well as the decision to post them to the
Internet.
At the time of the FMSP, NATO was engaged in its bombing campaign in the
conflict in Serbia/Kosovo. In his address to the opening plenary Axworthy
called on the international community to develop a capacity for rapid,
coordinated humanitarian mine action in post-conflict situations. “The
international community must be ready to respond urgently to ensure that when
the time comes, they can return to their homes in
safety.”[5] He detailed
the need to mobilize and coordinate available resources, to improve information
gathering from refugees, and other sources and to identify demining priorities.
The Minister also suggested the need for the quick assembly and dispatch of
survey and assessment teams, ongoing identification of equipment and personnel
available for mine action, as well as the provision of mine awareness training
for refugees and those involved in their resettlement.
Transparency Reporting
Canada submitted its Article 7 Transparency Reports as required and made
copies available immediately. The first report was submitted on 27 August 1999,
reporting on the period 1 January 1999 to 31 July 1999 and the second was
submitted on 27 April 2000, reporting on the period 1 August 1999 to 14 March
2000.[6] Canadian officials
reported fully on all of the areas required under Article 7 and, in the second
report provided additional information on the use of mines retained for research
and development, as well as training (for further information, see section on
Stockpiling and Destruction).
There have been problems with late submission of Article 7 Reports by other
countries. Canadian officials have stressed the importance of states parties
fulfilling the treaty's reporting requirements, have compiled reports detailing
the reasons why states parties may be late in fulfilling this treaty obligation,
and have made efforts to facilitate their submission while urging other states
to do likewise.
As of 30 May 2000, Canada was one of only eight OAS member states to submit
information to the OAS Register of Antipersonnel
Landmines.[7]
International Promotion of the Mine Ban Treaty
Canada continues to play an important and leading role in the global campaign
to ban antipersonnel mines and to eliminate their socio-economic impact.
Canadians have worked to universalize the treaty, to increase funds for
clearance and victim assistance and other mine action, as well as to promote the
Mine Ban Treaty. The Government of Canada's Mine Action Team, through the
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (ILX-DFAIT), was expanded
with the addition of program officers and support staff. Through their efforts
the issue has been raised repeatedly in regional and international fora around
the world. From Kosovo to Latin America and Mozambique, Canadian delegations
have raised the issue of landmines and the Mine Ban Treaty in efforts to
persuade others to take these critical steps to fulfill their obligations to the
treaty and to meet its objectives.
Canada has raised the MBT in statements made in the G-8, the UN Security
Council, APEC, the OAS, the Commonwealth, the ASEAN Regional Forum, la
Francophonie, and other international fora. While in Russia at a conference on
human security and northern policy Foreign Minister Axworthy asked then acting
president Vladimir Putin to put in place a timetable for signature of the MBT
and destruction of Russian
stockpiles.[8]
As in past years, in 1999 Canada helped to draft and was a major promoter of
the UN General Assembly resolution supporting the Mine Ban Treaty. In December
1999 Canada voted in favor of UNGA Resolution 54/54B
The government has played a key role in the Mine Ban Treaty’s
intersessional program. It is a co-chair of the SCE on the General Status and
Operation of the Convention, and Canadian officials have also chaired or
presented to other sessions within the SCEs.
Non-State Actors
In two separate statements Minister Axworthy referred to non-state actors
(NSAs) in regards to the MBT and to human security and “the need to find
ways to address the challenges they [NSAs] raise. Two years after the Ottawa
Convention, the role of these non-state actors, as participants in armed
conflict or in perpetuating the new war economies, is the subject of growing
scrutiny from the G-8 to the
UN.”[9] Canada provided
C$40,000 to the conference "Engaging Non-State Actors in a Landmine Ban," 24-25
March 2000. The conference was hosted by the Swiss Campaign to Ban Landmines.
Naming Names
Canada was among the first and one of the most vocal countries to publicly
name the states where new use of mines has been reported (especially Angola and
Kosovo) since the conclusion of the MBT. Foreign Minister Axworthy has said,
“This is cause for real concern.... We must use this opportunity to speak
out about these acts that violate the new international norm created by the
treaty. We must respond to those who challenge the validity of the treaty. We
can do this by working at the regional level to bring pressure to bear on those
governments to stop creating this humanitarian disaster in our neighborhoods.
We must call these miscreants to account: to their own publics and to the
international
community.”[10]
With respect to Angola, a treaty signatory using mines in the conflict
against UNITA, Minister Axworthy has suggested that Canadian assistance for
clearance and other mine action would be withheld from states that continue to
use mines. “The Convention is helping: the fact is that it makes much
more sense to invest in the painstaking and costly task of mine clearance in
places where governments have said they will never again use these
weapons.”[11]
At the United Nations, Canada said, “No longer will countries,
particularly signatory countries, be able to use landmines with
impunity.”[12] Similar
statements have been made in Helsinki, Finland and in St. Petersburg,
Russia.[13]
In Geneva, in December 1999, a Canadian delegate raised the issue of mine use
by Russia in its war on Chechnya. “Canada continues to have serious
concerns about reports concerning the indiscriminate use of antipersonnel mines
by the Russian military in the context of the ongoing conflict in Chechnya....
Many of these mines were remotely delivered against no apparent military
target.... Russian forces appear to have taken few if any steps to protect
civilians in that conflict from the effects of mines, for example through the
posting of signs, sentries, or fences around known mined areas. Canada would
welcome clarification of these issues from Russian authorities as soon as
possible.”[14] In the
same statement Canada called for clarification from Pakistan authorities on
allegations that Pakistan Ordnance Factories offered AP mines to a British
citizen, an infringement under Article 8 of Amended Protocol
II.[15]
Landmine Monitor
Canada helped to conceptualize the Landmine Monitor system and has been among
those countries supporting the Landmine Monitor initiative since its inception
in 1998. In addition to financial grants the federal government also provided
logistical and in-kind support for Landmine Monitor meetings held in
Canada.[16] In his address to
the First Meeting of States Parties, Axworthy welcomed the role of NGOs and
civil society in monitoring the treaty. “We also have the power of civil
society behind us -- a community committed to ensuring that the gains made in
the negotiation and signing of the AP mine ban convention become real and remain
respected. This community has made an incredible contribution to this effort
with the publication, in record time, of Mine Monitor (sic), with its
comprehensive documentation of the mine issue in over 100 countries. Canada is
proud to have been an early and vigorous supporter of this effort -- we
encourage others to join in funding this publication and helping it become an
annual citizen's companion to our
Convention.”[17] At that
time Axworthy described the Landmine Monitor initiative as having "established
itself as a world leader in highlighting international violations of the Ottawa
Convention. I believe that they have proven instrumental in holding governments
accountable for mine-related actions and obligations and that their annual
report provides decision-makers with essential feedback on our progress in
ridding the world of
landmines.”[18]
Regional Promotion of the Mine Ban Treaty
The realization of the Western Hemisphere as a mine free zone and other mine
action activities within the Americas has been identified as a top priority for
Canadian foreign policy efforts. Canada has been a strong supporter of various
Organization of American States (OAS) resolutions and declarations relating to
landmines. Most significant is the 1996 OAS resolution calling for a
hemispheric mine free zone.
At the 30th OAS General Assembly, hosted by Canada in Windsor, Ontario,
4-6 June 2000, delegates voted unanimously on a resolution calling on all OAS
member states, donors and agencies working in mine action to increase efforts to
complete clearance programs in Central America as soon as possible. A second
resolution calls for the OAS to continue efforts to provide assistance in
combating the AP mine problem in Ecuador and Peru. Also relevant to the AP mine
issue are resolutions on small arms and the important role of civil society
within the OAS.[19] The OAS
has been Canada's main partner in mine action in the Americas. According to
Minister Axworthy, the OAS Summit of the Americas will take place in
Québec City, 20-22 April 2001.
In accepting the Endicott Peabody Award for Humanitarian Works, Minister
Axworthy noted the refusal of the U.S. to sign the treaty while urging the
Administration to accede to it and to “join the moral force of the United
States with that of those who have already done
so.”[20]
Domestic Promotion of the Mine Ban Treaty
Within Canada, the mine issue has been repeatedly raised. Federal ministers,
in various appearances and speaking engagements for clubs and business meetings,
have often raised the issue of the Mine Ban Treaty as a key example of Canadian
efforts to promote human security. Domestically, Canadian youth, funded
through the Youth Internship Program, have continuously educated the public on
landmines-related issues. Their messages consistently emphasize the need to ban
landmines, to raise awareness and to encourage Canadians to contribute to the
support of humanitarian mine action. By all accounts the Youth Mine Action
Ambassador Programme is a success and will continue into the foreseeable future.
Role of Canadian NGOs
Canadian NGOs and civil society initiatives in mine action range from
implementation of programs in the field to directing advocacy efforts toward
governments. The Mines Action Canada coalition remains the largest coordinated
body working with NGOs in all aspects of mine action. The coalition currently
has more than forty partner organizations. The MAC Secretariat and individual
members have written letters to the Canadian government and to various other
heads of state or state representatives on issues relating to the MBT. Topics
have included the use of Claymore mines in peacekeeping operations, joint
operations, promotion of a NATO policy on no use of AP mines, funds for mine
action and the universalization of the MBT.
MAC was one of five campaigns which organized a non-state actor conference in
Geneva and has undertaken a variety of education and outreach projects and been
represented at numerous meetings and speaking engagements. Activities such as
the MAC website, a newsletter, the Appropriate Technology Competition, and
Africa Refugee Day are ongoing.
Throughout 1999/2000 MAC initiated several outreach activities with cultural
and community groups on the mine issue and continues to host a series of
capacity building workshops for NGOs involved in mine
action.[21] The workshops are
intended to share ideas and improve practices in mine action and are based on
the Bad Honnef Guidelines for mine action from a development-oriented point of
view. Workshops take place on a quarterly basis and have included participants
from government and NGOs. Topics covered include mine awareness programs and
establishing priorities for mine action based on community needs. MAC has also
organized workshops and briefing sessions on Claymore mines and cluster bombs
and presented papers to the Canadian government on both of these issues. Mines
Action Canada, the Canadian Red Cross and the Youth Mine Action Ambassador
Program organized a major exhibition called Ban landmines ’99 to mark the
December anniversary of the opening for signature of the Mine Ban Treaty and
also held a series of public events across the country as part of Canadian
Landmine Awareness Week to highlight the 1 March 2000 anniversary of entry into
force of the treaty.
MAC in partnership with the Canadian Red Cross and the Mine Action Team at
DFAIT implement an outreach and sustainability program focused on Canadian
students and youth. The Youth Mine Action Ambassadors Program (YMAA) grew from
five youth interns in the first year to eight in the second year. Working within
local host NGOs (UNICEF Québec, Canadian Red Cross, MAC and Oxfam Canada)
the Youth Ambassadors raise public awareness, build public support for mine
action and raise funds. These goals are met through organized events in
schools, colleges and universities, as well as various activities with the
general public. During the second year, the Youth Ambassadors undertook
presentations and events in over 130 Canadian cities and towns reaching an
estimated 35,000 people directly. This included 691 school presentations,
fifty-four speaking events and 268 media interviews and
articles.[22]
Mines Action Canada is a member of the Landmine Monitor Core Group and
coordinates research in the Americas region. It is also developing the Landmine
Monitor Database. The database is an information management tool that will
facilitate the Landmine Monitor initiative specifically and mine action in
general. Information collected and analyzed by Landmine Monitor is updated and
published in the annual Landmine Monitor reports and incorporated into the
database. The database is available
online.[23] Mines Action Canada
is a member of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) Coordinating
Committee and is active in several of its working groups.
CCW and CD
While Canada has signed and ratified both the original and the amended
protocols of the CCW dealing with landmines, it also has consistently promoted
the MBT as the best method to advance a total ban on AP mines and promote mine
action. At the First Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended Protocol II
of the CCW in Geneva, December 1999 the Canadian statement reaffirmed this
position. “Canada continues to believe that the only sustainable and
effective solution to the AP mines problem is a total ban on their production,
stockpiling, trade and use. Partial restrictions such as those contained within
Amended Protocol II must be seen as an important but temporary step on the path
towards the total elimination of these weapons, which both in practical use and
by technical design are quite obviously
indiscriminate.”[24]
On 10 December 1999, Canada submitted its Article 13 report. In its report,
Canada again noted the supremacy of the MBT over Canadian obligations under the
CCW.[25]
The Canadian delegation proposed measures to the States Parties related to
Articles 2 (definitions) and 14 (compliance) in the Amended Protocol II to bring
them in closer alignment with the Mine Ban Treaty. Another proposal related to
antivehicle (AV) mines and the need to better protect civilians against their
effects. The delegate in his statement said Canada would support efforts to
develop minimal detectability standards for AV mines similar to those currently
in place for AP mines. “Moreover, we would also support efforts to
examine restrictions and/or total prohibitions on remotely delivered AV mines
which are not equipped with self-destruct and/or self-deactivation
devices.”[26]
Canada participated in the January 2000 session of the Conference on
Disarmament (CD) but made no statements regarding AP mines. However in the
January 1999 session Canada said it would not support any work in the CD that
will impair or hamper the effectiveness of the Mine Ban Treaty. “If such
negotiations do take place, the only standards that we will accept are those of
the Mine Ban Convention. Canada will not be a party to moving international law
backwards.”[27]
Production
The last mines produced in Canada were made by SNC
Industrial Technologies of Le Gardeur, Québec. Production ceased in 1992
and the production capability was removed in
1998.[28] In 1999 SNC-Lavalin
International established its Mine Action Services Branch. For detailed
information on past Canadian production and export of the C3A1/2 AP mines, prior
to the MBT, see the Landmine Monitor 1999 report.
Alternatives to AP Mines
The Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technologies (CCMAT), created in 1998, is
a joint initiative of the DND and Industry Canada. CCMAT’s research
facilities are based at the Defence Research Establishment Suffield (DRES) in
Medicine Hat, Alberta. Part of CCMAT's mandate is to investigate alternatives
to AP mines, “to show that viable and more humane alternatives, that do
not target civilians, can be developed as a way to persuade hold-out countries
to sign the
Convention.”[29] CCMAT's
Project Charter outlines this aspect of the center's mandate: “while there
is no single technology or device that provides for a one-for-one replacement
for anti-personnel mines, there may be alternative approaches that can
accomplish the anti-personnel landmine function within the constraints of the
convention in some scenarios and for some threats. The Centre would study and
document such alternative approaches and identify technologies necessary for
their implementation.”[30]
CCMAT plans to conduct its investigation into alternatives by acquiring,
modifying and/or developing computer models (see below) to assess alternatives
to landmines and the development of sensor and command and control technologies
as components of alternative
systems.[31] The budget is set
at C$1.5 million over 5 years.
Concern has been raised by Mines Action Canada about the use of the Canadian
Landmine Fund to finance research into alternatives to
landmines.[32]
CCMAT's activities on alternatives coincide with NATO's research into
alternatives to AP mines says Dr. Bob Suart, CCMAT's Director. He is adamant
that CCMAT is looking into non-lethal alternatives
only.[33] According to Suart,
NATO's research into alternatives has been ongoing since 1998 under what he
referred to as NATO SAS 023. “NATO is concerned that if the army gives up
AP mines, what is the impact and what are the appropriate measures to make up
for that loss. NATO is liable to come up with an alternative weapons system and
we're not interested in that,” said Suart. "We don't have the budget to
develop alternative [weapons systems]. We don't have the inclination and we
don't have the mandate."[34]
Under CCMAT, operational research staff from DND are taking part in NATO
meetings as part of Canada's contribution to the NATO study on alternatives to
AP mines. “There have been no expenditures or assignments of CCMAT funds
to develop alternatives,” Suart told Landmine
Monitor.[35]
CCMAT developed an operational research study in computer modeling on the
military utility of AP mine use. Carried out by the Directorate Land Strategic
Concepts at DND, the study reviewed the historical use of AP mines to identify
the operational gap caused by removing AP mines from military inventories. As
recorded in CCMAT Management Committee Minutes dated 26 February 1999, early
results of the research suggest that the operational impact of removing AP mines
from combat is marginal and that there are no obvious replacement
technologies.[36] The next step
for CCMAT in the search for alternatives to AP mines is to build computer models
to assess proposed alternatives.
MAC was invited to sit on the CCMAT management committee, but because of the
concern vis-à-vis alternatives (particularly the possible use of funds
allocated for humanitarian mine action to develop alternative weapons systems)
chose to sit as an observer only and has no vote on the selection of projects.
Transfer and Transit
Canada distinguishes between the transfer and the
transit of AP mines. Canada continues to maintain that while the transfer
(import/export) of AP mines is prohibited under the Convention, the Convention
does not address the issue of the transit of mines. "Transit is the movement
from one part of a state's territory to another part of the territory of the
same state. Canada has no legal obligation to prohibit the transit of mines
through our territory by other states. However, Canada discourages
this."[37] A number of States
Parties, as well as the ICRC, have said that transit is prohibited by the Mine
Ban Treaty.[38]
Stockpiling and Destruction
The destruction of Canadian stockpiles, with the
exception of those retained for training in mine clearance and the testing of
clearance technologies, was completed in November 1997.
Before the UN in November 1999, Canada's Ambassador for Mine Action, Daniel
Livermore, placed emphasis on the destruction of stockpiled mines as one of the
most important methods for eliminating landmines, thereby preventing their trade
and use. “Canada commends states that have partially or completely
destroyed their stockpiled mines, and we call on all signatories to the Ottawa
Convention to finalize a timetable for stockpile destruction. Canada is working
in partnership with Ukraine to assist in the destruction of its anti-personnel
mines, and we urge other states which have the means to do so to provide similar
assistance in the destruction of mine stockpiles wherever it may be
needed.”[39] Minister
Axworthy has also placed emphasis on Canada's willingness to help with
destruction of stockpiles and referred to Canadian assistance in destroying
Ukraine's 10 million stockpiled mines.[40](See report on Ukraine for
details.)
According to public statements by the Minister of Defence, Art Eggleton, and
Minister Axworthy, Canada has elected to keep a maximum of 2,000 AP mines under
the treaty exception for training purposes. This is not codified in Canadian
law, but appears to have taken the form of a ministerial
directive.[41] In
Canada’s second Article 7 Report there is clear mention that the
Department of National Defence (DND) retains a maximum of 2,000 mines for this
purpose.[42] These numbers will
change over time as mines are used (at a projected rate of 50 per year), and
more foreign mines are imported. Mines have already been imported in this way
from Georgia.
Following a call by the ICBL in December 1999 for states to include in their
Article 7 reports the anticipated and actual use of mines retained for training
purposes, Canada added a detailed description on this to its second report.
“Canada retains live AP mines to study the effect of blast on equipment,
to train soldiers on procedures to defuse live AP mines and to demonstrate the
effects of landmines. For example, live mines help determine whether suits,
boots and shields will adequately protect personnel who clear mines. The live
mines are used by the Defence department's research establishment located at
Suffield, Alberta and by various military training establishments across Canada.
DND represents the only source of AP mines which can be used by Canadian
industry to test
equipment.”[43]
During interviews for the 1999 Landmine Monitor, it was revealed that likely
DND sites with stockpiled AP mines for training are the base near Dundurn,
Saskatchewan, and another defense research establishment at Valcartier,
Québec.[44]
In its first Article 7 report, Canada reported that it had a stock of 1,781
training mines.[45] In its
second Article 7 report, Canada reported that its stock of training mines was
1,668.[46] Thus, a total of 113
training mines were used between 31 July 1999 and 14 March 2000; a total of
eighty-four AP mines were used for research and development and twenty-nine AP
mines were used for Canadian Forces’ training. Nearly all of these (106
mines) were emplaced at the Canadian Forces Base Suffield, Alberta, “for
the research and development of mine detection, mine clearance equipment and
mine detection
procedures.”[47]
As of 14 March 2000, Canada’s stockpile of 1,668 training mines
included 962 C3A2 (Canadian), 485 M16A1/2 (U.S.), 42 PMA-1 (former Yugoslavia),
28 PMA-2 (former Yugoslavia), 30 PMA-3 (former Yugoslavia), 84 PP-MI-No.1
(Czechoslovakia), 15 VS50 (Italy), 10 VAL M69 (Italy), 8 VS MK2 (Italy), and 4
SB-33 (Italy). An additional 67 PMN-2 mines were imported from Georgia and
added to Canadian stockpiles for clearance training and testing
technologies.[48]
In addition to its program with Ukraine, Canada sent a delegation to Honduras
and Nicaragua in February of this year to provide technical assistance in the
destruction of AP
stockpiles.[49] In December
1999 and March 2000 during the SCEs on Stockpile Destruction, General (Ret'd.)
Gordon Reay chaired the session "Stockpile Destruction as an Integral Part of
Mine Action" and presented on the topic. General Reay is an advisor to the
Canadian Mine Action Team on stockpile destruction.
DFAIT is currently working with the United Nations Mine Action Service
(UNMAS) to develop a stockpile destruction website/database as an in-kind
contribution to UNMAS. The purpose of the proposed website/database is to
enable the mine action community to share information on all matters pertaining
to stockpile destruction, thereby facilitating cooperation between potential
donors and recipients and more effectively disseminating best practice and
standards on stockpile destruction experiences and expertise.
Canada retains stockpiles of Claymore mines. The number of Claymore mines
held by Canada is unknown; this information was not reported in either of
Canada's Article 7 reports submitted to date.
Use
Claymore Mines
In October 1999, Canadian Forces taking part in UN
peacekeeping operations brought Claymore mines to East Timor. While there is no
evidence the Claymores were used, the incident received considerable media
attention in early February 2000. A Captain in the Canadian Forces was
reported as saying that less than 100 Claymores were taken to East
Timor.[50]
A letter sent to Minister Lloyd Axworthy from Mines Action Canada, dated 18
February 2000, raised concerns about the potential for Claymore mines to be used
in either of two modes: command-detonated or tripwire activated. The letter
from MAC was not based on concerns that Canadian Forces may have been using
Claymores in victim-activated (tripwire) mode. MAC wrote, “Although
understood the use of these weapons in command-detonated mode is not prohibited
under the MBT, it is unclear if modifications to them are an adequate response
to concerns regarding indiscriminate nature and long-term negative impact.
While modifications suggest a change in intent they may not fundamentally alter
the weapon....”[51]
The Minister's response to MAC's letter, dated 20 June 2000, states that the
C19 and the M18A1 Claymore weapons are of the same design and contain sockets or
fuzewells in which a detonator is placed. The letter goes on to explain that
detonators are of two varieties: command activated (through the application of
an electrical current) and mechanically or victim-activated. “It is
possible to attach a tripwire to this second type of detonator only. A tripwire
would be incompatible with the first variety of detonator (command-activated).
Let me emphasize that the Canadian Armed Forces do not possess, and are not
permitted to possess, victim-activated detonators for application to the C19.
Canada only stocks command-activated detonators and simply does not possess the
accessories required for conversion of the C19 into an antipersonnel
mine.”[52] Canadian
Forces personnel have been advised through several means that the use of AP
mines and the unauthorized use of Claymore mines, that is booby-trapping to
facilitate victim-activation, is illegal and is punishable under Canadian
law.[53]
Joint Military Operations
Canada appended the following “understanding” on joint military
operations to its ratification of the Mine Ban Treaty: "It is the understanding
of the Government of Canada that, in the context of operations, exercises or
other military activity sanctioned by the United Nations or otherwise conducted
in accordance with the international law, the mere participation by the Canadian
Forces, or individual Canadians, in operations, exercises or other military
activity conducted in combination with the armed forces of States not party to
the Convention which engage in activity prohibited under the Convention would
not, by itself, be considered to be assistance, encouragement or inducement in
accordance with the meaning of those terms in Article 1, paragraph
1(c)."[54] In addition,
Canadian legislation states that participation in operations with a state not
party to the MBT is allowed “if that participation does not amount to
active assistance in that prohibited
activity.”[55]
Canadian officials have said that the intent of the understanding is mainly
to ensure Canadian military personnel are able to participate fully in joint
operations, for example with NATO allies, without fear of
prosecution.[56]
Concerns about Canada's position regarding joint military operations were
reported in the Landmine Monitor Report 1999. However, since then, the
NATO alliance was involved in the military conflict in Kosovo and Yugoslavia.
During the conflict the U.S. maintained the right to use AP mines (though it
never did), making concerns about the implications of use of AP mines by a
non-State Party in a joint military operation more immediate and tangible than
before. In September 1999 Mines Action Canada wrote to Minister Axworthy asking
him to support the ICBL's call for a “no use” policy by NATO.
Although a written reply has not been received, MAC has been informed by a DFAIT
official that the government's policy on joint operations remains unchanged.
Mine Action Funding
On 3 December 1997 at the signing of the MBT in
Ottawa, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien announced the establishment of a
C$100 million (US$67.3 million) fund over a five-year period to implement the
treaty.[57] This funding
evolved into the Canadian Landmine Fund (CLF), which is jointly managed by four
government departments: the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA),
the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), the
Department of National Defence (DND), and Industry Canada (IC).
Unless otherwise indicated projects reported here are funded during
Canada’s Fiscal Year (FY) 1999-2000, which ran from 1 April 1999 to 31
March 2000.
In FY 1999-2000, Canadian funding for mine action totalled C$26 million
(US$16.7 million), a very significant increase over last year’s US$9.5
million.[58]
Government Reports
Canadian government transparency on reporting how funds are expended on mine
action both domestically and internationally is very good. Information is
provided in annual reports to Parliament, through press releases, regular
progress reports and publications, on departmental websites and a detailed
financial listing is available on the UN Mine Action Investment Database.
A report on the activities and projects supported by the Canadian Landmine
Fund is submitted annually to the Parliament. The Mine Action Team at the
Department of Foreign Affairs takes the lead in reporting on behalf of the four
departments involved in the Canadian Landmine Fund. The first annual report
(1998-99) was submitted to Parliament on 3 December 1999, the second anniversary
of the signing of the Mine Ban Treaty. The document, entitled “Seeds of
Terror, Seeds of Hope” is available to the general public as well and is
posted to the Department of Foreign Affairs “Safelane”
website.[59]
The report provides a good overview of the issue and international efforts to
implement the treaty. It also provides a description of the numerous steps that
the Government of Canada is taking as part of its commitment to the treaty,
including country-by-country reports of where Canada is funding mine action.
The report generally provides short descriptions of each project or program,
including government and NGO partners including the sums of money
contributed.[60] The projects
are categorized according to various mine action sectors.
UN Mine Action Investment Datatbase
The ILX-DFAIT Mine Action Team has made significant contributions to the
development and operation of the UN Mine Action Investment Database. As more
and more countries supply data it has the potential to be a valuable tool for a
thorough understanding of global mine action funding. For specific donors the
database can provide annual reports that include a description of the country's
funding by recipient country and by regional/multilateral/thematic programming.
Each program expenditure lists the country, amount in U.S. dollars, the funding
source (e.g. department/agency), contribution type (monetary or in-kind),
activity type (e.g. victim assistance, integrated mine action), program
description, and funding channel/implementing agency. The program contributions
for each country are totalled.
Government Policy on Mine Action Funding
The Canadian Landmine Fund uses the following criteria for project funding:
humanitarian or developmental impact of landmines in the recipient country, the
political commitment of the recipient country to the Mine Ban Treaty, recipient
country's commitment to carrying out mine action, Canadian capacity, and
neutrality and
impartiality.[61]
In addition to the above criteria, projects funded by the Canadian
International Development Agency must also complement CIDA's programming
objective in the country in which it is to be implemented, and demonstrate an
acceptable level of gender and environmental
analysis.[62]CIDA continues
to work to improve its activities in humanitarian mine action (mine clearance,
surveys, mine awareness and victim assistance). Changes at CIDA have brought the
management of Canadian NGO projects into the Mine Action Unit, which should
result in having them more closely integrated into the overall mine action
programming of CIDA.
Further to these criteria the Canadian Government has also begun to draft
both Progress Indicators and Guidelines to determine program or project funding
and influence the overall direction of Canadian funding in mine action. The
Mine Action Team of the Department of Foreign Affairs (ILX-DFAIT) has taken the
lead on both of these policy areas.
On 1 May 1999 it issued a document entitled, “Measured Steps: Assessing
Global Progress on Mine Action,” which states that indicators are needed
to measure any progress in the fight against
landmines.[63] DFAIT suggests
likely indicators for Canadian initiatives and proposes to use these indicators
to analyse the progress made to date. Measures of progress used in the report
include: banning the production, stockpiling, trade and use of antipersonnel
mines; reducing mine casualties; clearing mined land; providing assistance to
mine victims and their communities; developing mine awareness; and, improving
mine action information and planning.
[64] Since the release of the
report ILX staff have consulted widely and continue to refine the indicators to
be used in measuring this
progress.[65]
The Mine Action Team at DFAIT has drafted a set of Guidelines that would seek
to provide a framework for developing, implementing and evaluating mine action
programs.[66] The indicators
focus on the following six areas: improving mine action information and
planning; clearing mined land; delivering mine awareness education and reducing
casualties; meeting the needs of landmine victims; ending the use, stockpiling,
production, and transfer of AP mines, and; sustaining mine action efforts.
The Canadian Mine Action Progress Indicators seek to provide the mine action
community with a clearer understanding of the state of mine action on a
county-by-country basis. This will enable donor governments, NGOs and
international agencies to see where effective mine action is absent, assess
which forms of delivery are the most/least effective, and indicate where
successes can be reinforced with the application of increased mine action
efforts. Parallel to this process two DFAIT consultations have also been held
within Canada on the various international standards and Canadian mine action
capacity.
Mine Action Programs Funded By Canadian Landmine Action Fund
Mine Clearance
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Deployment of 550 SFOR-trained Entity Armies
deminers and two Bozena mini-flails. Implemented by the Canadian Engineering
Division of SFOR. C$630,000 (US$423,990)Support to Bosnian demining NGO, Akcija
Mina in partnership with Handicap International. C$790,000 (US$531,670);
training and deployment of 24 Bosnian deminers as part of Norwegian People's Aid
mine clearance project in Sarajevo Canton. C$250,000 (US$168,250); training and
deployment of 12 mine detection dogs and their Bosnian handlers. Implemented by
the Canadian International Demining Centre (CIDC). C$350,000 (US$235,530)
Cambodia: Emergency bridge funding to the Cambodia Mine Action Centre
(CMAC) to assist the centre in addressing short-term financial requirements
while it addresses necessary reforms to its management practices. C$400,000
(US$269,200); provision of middle management training for CMAC personnel.
C$11,000 (US$7403)
Ecuador: Contribution to the OAS/UPD Trust Fund for Demining Program
in Ecuador and Peru. The objective is to allow the OAS to coordinate and execute
operations within the program. C$200,000 (US$134,600); funding provided to the
Government of Ecuador for demining and protective gear. C$92,500 (US$62,253)
Jordan: Funding to the Canadian International Demining Centre for the
provision of protective demining equipment. C$500,000 (US$336,500)
Moldova: Provision of 10 mine clearance personal protection systems
(suits) to the Moldovan Army Engineers. Protective suits are the SRS-5 model
manufactured by Med-Eng Systems of Canada. C$120,000 (US$80,760)
Nicaragua: Funding provided to strengthen the OAS Assistance
Programme for Demining specifically in the northern border region with Honduras
in the area known as Operational Front #4. Canada and Norway are funding this
two-year program covering operational expenses in the field, protective
clothing, food, vehicle maintenance insurance and minimal administrative costs.
C$1,000,000 (US$673,000); provision of minefield marking signs to OAS. C$4,984
(US$3,354)
Peru: Contribution to the OAS/UPD Trust Fund for Demining Program in
Peru and Ecuador. The objective is to allow the OAS to coordinate and execute
operations within the program. C$200,000 (US$134,600); provision of personal
protective demining equipment to Government of Peru. C$92,500 (US$62,252)
Canada: Funding provided to the CIDC for the development of a center
of excellence in explosives detection dogs.
Mine Awareness
Angola: Working though four local NGOs, UNICEF delivers mines
awareness messages at the community level using theater, puppet shows, posters,
wooden mine dummies, traditional songs and dances. The target groups of this
project are primary and secondary school aged children of displaced communities
who are congregating in the provincial capitals of Huambo, Kuito, Huila and
Bengo. C$250,000 (US$168,250); evaluation by CIET Canada of mine awareness
programming in Angola. C$60,000 (US$40,380)
Colombia: Support to UNICEF and the Colombian Ministry of Education
for mine awareness activities. C$100,000 (US$67,300)
Victim Assistance
Afghanistan: Funding for the UNDP's Comprehensive Disabled Afghan
Program (CDAP) directed at the orthopedic component. Covers salaries, raw
materials for orthopedic devices, training sessions, and seminars on the
standardisation of orthopedic technology and physiotherapy training. C$300,000
(US$201,900); funding to provide comprehensive rehabilitation services,
particularly orthopedics and physiotherapy, to landmine victims through existing
NGO, Guardians, in Kandahar. Also supports skills analysis and delivers
appropriate training for staff of the clinic in Kandahar by the Royal Ottawa
Rehabilitation Centre. C$163,000 (US$112,391)
Africa (not country specific): Support to the WHO for pilot testing
of mine victim survey tools in various African states. C$250,000
(US$168,250)
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Contribution to Slovenia Trust Fund for
victim assistance. C$70,000 (US$47,110)
Cambodia The goal of this World Vision Canada project is that the
disabled population in Battambang, Pursat, Banteay Meanchey, and Pailin
provinces become reintegrated into society with either employment skills or an
established business that will enable them to be self-sufficient. C$250,000
(US$168,250)
Central America: Community Based Rehabilitation for Landmine Victims
in Central America; A tripartite Canada-Mexico-PAHO Initiative. The overall goal
of the program is to assist landmine victims in Nicaragua, El Salvador, in a
context of post-conflict reconstruction and to integrate victims in the
development effort of these countries. This initiative has been developed in
co-operation with Mexico and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and in
consultation with the Central American Republics. The program consists of: (1)
rural rehabilitation services through long-term sustainable community-based
rehabilitation programs, (2) prosthetic/orthotic development on a regional basis
and (3) a landmine victim socio-economic reintegration program. C$750,000
(US$504,750)
El Salvador: The Healing Ourselves Healing The Land Project aims at
training landmine victims in the development of environmentally appropriate
technologies. A small enterprise loan and local alternative economic trading
initiative will help support community economic development. The Sierra Club of
British Colombia (The GAIA Project) collaborates with a local NGO in
implementing the project. C$125,000 (US$84,125)
Guatemala: In collaboration with the Government of Israel, the
International Centre for Community Based Rehabilitation at Queens University,
Kingston, Canada implements this victim assistance project. Its goal is to
facilitate the full social and economic reintegration of persons with
disabilities in a post-conflict region though the implementation of community
based rehabilitation. C$200,000 (US$134,600)
Nicaragua: The Falls Brook Centre in collaboration with local
partners operates the “Creating New Energy-Building the Future,” a
project offering mine awareness education to communities in the East and West
Rio Coco region. The main focus of the project is to train landmine victims in
solar electrification so that they can be employed as distributors, installers
and system maintenance experts for the community solar systems in the villages.
The project also assists landmine victims with fitted prostheses. C$ 100,000
(US$67,300)
Sierra Leone: Support for a victim assistance rehabilitation program
implemented by the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation. C$29,400
(US$19,786)
Uganda: This Canadian Network for International Surgery project aims
at developing an information database for program planning and resource
allocation, to improve health worker skills in emergency care hospitals and to
enhance public education on all aspects of landmine victims problems. C$75,000
(US$50,475)
Yemen: The main objective of this ADRA Canada project is to provide
community based rehabilitation services to the severely disabled persons and to
provide vocational assistance in establishing a means of income for landmine
victims and/or their families. C$150,000 (US$100,950)
Integrated Mine Action
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Institutional support to the Mine Action
Centres. This program is implemented by the UNDP and it supports core functions
of the BHMAC and Entity MACs, and the secondment of DND experts to serve within
these MACs. C$930,000 (US$625,890)
Cambodia: Funding to Geomatics Canada for a Level 1 Survey. C$146,000
(US$90,858)
Chad: Core funding to support Chad Mine Action Centre. C$150,000
(US$100,950)
Lao People's Democratic Republic: Contribution to the UNDP Trust Fund
to support UXO Lao in developing a national capacity to manage a mine action
program. C$ 150,000 (US$100,950)
Mozambique: The Canadian Auto Workers (CAW), in partnership with
CUSO, Handicap International and COCAMO (Co-operation Canada-Mozambique),
project supports mine awareness, victim assistance, proximity demining and
post-clearance community development activities, in close collaboration with
provincial authorities, development agencies and local NGOs. CIDA's financial
assistance ($330,000) is matched by the CAW. C$333,000 (US$224,109); a program
consisting of three components that will significantly support and strengthen
mine action in Mozambique: organizing and conducting a national level one survey
implemented by Canadian International Demining Centre (CIDC); geospatial
information gathering for the production of maps at a scale of 1:50,000 that
will facilitate mine action by various demining organizations throughout
Mozambique; and the provision of Canadian technical mine action specialists to
the UN-supported Accelerated Demining Program to support training of survey
personnel and database management. C$1,716,000 (US$1,154,868); emergency mine
action assistance in support of UNMAS program to respond to Mozambique flooding.
Funding for mine awareness activities to prevent an increase in the number of
landmine accidents when the population return home. C$500,000 (US$336,500).
International: Core funding to UNMAS for Emergency Contingency
Funding for Urgent Humanitarian Situations. Humanitarian emergency mine action
situations due to natural disasters or to political crises, are impossible to
plan for. Each situation is different and creates or worsens a mine
contamination problem, which further exacerbates the humanitarian crisis on the
ground. C$250,000 (US$168,250); core funding for UNMAS (unearmarked). C$500,000
(US$336,500); funding to the ICRC special appeal for Mine Action (1999-2003) to
cover the cost of preventive action (mine awareness) and victim assistance
(surgical, medical and hospital assistance and well and physical rehabilitation)
in communities most affected by landmines. C$300,000 (US201,900); seed money for
the Canadian Landmine Foundation (for details see below). C$550,000
(US$370,150)
Advocacy and Prevention
Cambodia, Vietnam: Support to Landmine Survivors Network for an
awareness raising trip by Queen Noor to both countries. C$10,000 (US$6,730)
Croatia: Funding to Strata Research to support June 1999 Zagreb
Regional Landmines Conference. C$10,000 (US$6,730)
Georgia: Support to IPPNW for a landmines conference in Tblisi,
Georgia. C$20,000 (US$13,460)
India: Support to the All India Women's Conference for six workshops
on mine issues held from August 1999 to March 2000. C$30,000 (US$20,190)
International: Core funding to the International Campaign to Ban
Landmines. C$200,000 (US$134,600); support for the Landmine Monitor initiative
of the ICBL. C$200,000 (US$134,600); support for Mines Action Canada advocacy
work in support of the antipersonnel landmines ban in Canada and abroad.
C$306,000 (US$205,938); support to York University Centre for International and
Security Studies to implement the Mine Action Research Program to promote
research on the univerzalization and implementation of the AP mine ban. C$47,215
(US$31,776)
Nigeria: Support for a workshop on mine action held in Nigeria.
Implemented by African Topics Magazine and the Centre for Conflict Resolution
and Peace Advocacy. C$10,000 (US$6,730)
Russia: Support to the International Physicians for the Prevention of
Nuclear War (IPPNW) for landmine ban campaign activities in Russia and the
former Soviet republics. C$100,000 (US$67,300)
Domestic: Funding to Cineflix for a documentary film on the landmine
crisis. C$30,000 (US$20,190); contribution to the Survive the Peace campaign of
the Canadian Red Cross. C$9,070 (US$6,104); funding for “Ban Landmines
'99” a major public event to raise awareness of landmines issues and to
mark the anniversary of the signing of the Ottawa Convention. Implemented by the
Canadian Red Cross. C$99,725 (US$67,114); seed money for the Canadian Landmine
Foundation. C$450,000 (US$302,850); contribution to Mines Action Canada to
support the Youth Mine Action Ambassador program to increase public awareness in
Canada. C$276,725 (US$186,237)
Research and Development
Canada: Funding for research and development activities of the
Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technologies (CCMAT). C$2,529,000
(US$1,702,152)
Information
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Fact finding mission by Rebuild International
to explore the possible conversion of mine production facilities. C$59,640
(US$40,138)
Thailand: Funding for consultants to do an assessment of Thailand's
Mine Action Centre. C$19,470 (US$13,103)
UNMAS: Funding to UNMAS for studies pertaining to the socio-economic
impact of landmines in Kosovo, Laos and Mozambique. C$100,000 (US$67,300);
funding for training and provision of more and better information on the
landmines problem for UN and NGO personnel involved in humanitarian work.
C$60,000 (US$40,380)
Coordination
Azerbaijan: Support for the development of national mine action
capacity. Implemented by UNDP. C$100,000 (US$67,300)
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Secondment of a Canadian expert as the UNDP
Task Manager to assist in coordination of mine action efforts. One year
secondment. C$75,000 (US$50,475); contribution to the Slovenian International
Trust Fund for provision of funds for mine action institutional support.
C$200,000 (US$134,600)
Croatia: Contribution to the Slovenian International Trust Fund for
provision of funds for mine action institutional support. C$200,000
(US$134,600)
FSMP: Support to representatives of various states to participate in
the First Meeting of States Parties. C$ 36,740 (US$24,727)
Mozambique: Support to the Mozambican government in its role as host
of the First Meeting of States Parties in Maputo, May 1999. C$20,000
(US$13,460)
United Nations: In-kind contribution to the development and
maintenance of a database on mine action investments made by donors, UN Mine
Action Investment database. C$20,000 (US$13,460)
Other Canadian Government Funded Mine Action Programs
The majority of Canada's mine action funding has come from the C$100 million,
five year Canadian Landmine Fund announced by the Prime Minister on 3 December
1997. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) has in the
past also funded mine clearance programs from its humanitarian assistance or
other program budgets. This has continued again this year.
Afghanistan: Funding for mine clearance and mapping activities
through UNOCHA. C$1,000,000 (US$673,000)
Bosnia and Herzegovina: A joint health and victim assistance project
implemented by Queen's University. The Community Based War Victims
Rehabilitation Project is a four-year, C$2.5 million (US$1,682,500) initiative.
Funding this year was C$243,246 (US$163,705).
In addition this year there were two major developments in terms of new
funding for mine action programs. The first of these was the launch of the
Canadian Landmine Foundation, a new private sector initiative to raise funds for
mine action (for more detail see Other Funding Sources section below). The
second major development has been the Government of Canada's funding of major
programs in Kosovo following the Balkans conflict in 1999. The mine action
elements of the Kosovo response are in addition to what is funded by the
Canadian Landmine Fund.
Kosovo: Following the cessation of conflict in the Balkans the
government of Canada began announcing humanitarian measures in support of
rehabilitation of Kosovo specifically and the Balkans in general. This included
a number of mine action activities funded through humanitarian program funding
envelopes and, therefore, separately from projects and programs supported by the
Canadian Landmine Fund.
Mine Clearance Programs: In-kind contribution of three Canadian
Forces personnel to support database and mapping work of UNMAAC for a period of
six months. C$76,000 (US$51,148); landmine and UXO removal operations in Kosovo
implemented by CIDC and Wolf Flats Ordnance Disposal Corporation. One
four-person mine/UXO clearance team was deployed over a four-month period.
C$528,000 (US$355,344) ; training and deploying mine action teams to focus on
clearance of emergency shelter areas. Five mine/UXO clearance teams totalling
twenty persons were deployed over a four-month period. Implemented by
International Demining Alliance Canada Inc. (IDAC) C$2,565,000 (US$1,726,245);
institutional support to the MACC provided three Department of National Defence
staff members seconded over a four month period to enter data for the database
and mapping services. C$150,000 (US$100,950); institutional support to MACC
supported core functions of the MACC. Implemented by UNMAS. C$500,000
(US$336,500); demining in Kosovo, Phase II will entail the provision of a
self-sufficient integrated mine/UXO clearance capability which will comprise the
Canadian/CIDA contribution to the UNMIK-MACC Year 2000 Mine Action Program for
Kosovo (project duration: 5 months). It consists of a project management team, a
manual mine clearance team, a mine detection dog team, an explosive ordnance
disposal team (EOD) and a mechanical system (mini-flail) clearance team.
C$2,800,000 (US$1,884,400). The phase is implemented by a consortium of
Canadian companies led by IDAC.
Mine Awareness Program: Support to UNICEF's Balkans Regional/Mine
Awareness Program to respond to the needs of women and children including the
implementation of mine awareness programs in Kosovo. C$200,000 (US$134,600)
Victim Assistance Program: Implemented by Queen's University this
project focuses on human capacity building, institutional support, and training
at the community center/health clinics level. C$500,000 (US$335,500); emergency
shelter and related demining project implemented by CARE and Minetech over a
four month period. The demining portion represents C$300,000 (US$201,900)
Coordination: Canada and Belgium co-funded an UNMAS assessment
mission to identify priority areas for humanitarian mine action. C$75,000
(US$50,475); six month secondment of a lieutenant colonel to serve as a liaison
between KFOR and the UNMAAC. $65,000 (US$43,745)
On 14 June 2000, a lead story on the front-page of a major Canadian daily
newspaper alluded to problems in CIDA's contracting procedures, which resulted
in a long delay in a C$2.5 million contract
tender.[67] In a follow-up
article the next day, the Minister responsible for CIDA, Maria Minna, stated
that the approval process slowed down when Canada considered new UN requirements
for demining companies. “It took a little longer than normal,” she
said. “We wanted to make sure that it was done right...It’s a very
complex process, and the technical and safety standards are very high.”
The UN sent a letter of appreciation to the Editor of the Globe and Mail
newspaper stating that Canada’s mine action efforts [last year in Kosovo],
as well as those of other donors, were [deployed] in the most effective and
efficient manner possible, in difficult
circumstances.”[68]
In-Kind Support
Given the leadership role taken by Canada on the landmines issue it is
difficult to report or to calculate the amount of in-kind contributions made.
Canadian Forces personnel often contribute to mine action in countries where
they are stationed as part of Canada's peacekeeping duties. Such activity may
not be noted in any summary of Canadian activities. The Department of Foreign
Affairs has provided support to numerous countries needing assistance either in
deciding to sign or accede to the treaty, but particularly in assisting
countries with depositing their ratification documents. Similar assistance is
also provided for Article 7 Transparency reports. Not all of these activities
may be reported in either the Mine Action Investment Database or the annual
reports to Parliament.
In-kind contributions reported in the UN Mine Action Investment database for
FY99-2000 are reported above. For 2000-2001 US$1,800 has been budgeted for an
in-kind donation for support of a conference in Belarus on demining and
stockpile destruction.
Other Funding Sources
Canadian Landmine Foundation
Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy announced the creation of the
Canadian Landmine Foundation public in a public address to the Empire Club in
Toronto on 28 June 1999. The Foundation received C$1 million (US$680,000) to
assist with its start up and first year's operating costs. In his speech
Minister Axworthy stated that the Canadian Landmine Foundation was launched so
that “individuals and corporations can contribute to help eradicate
landmines and ease the human suffering they cause. It will encourage Canadians
to maintain the lead and set the example for demining efforts across the
globe.”[69] Of the initial
seed money from the government $450,000 (US$302,850) was for start up and
initial fundraising events and $550,000 (US$370,150) was for project funding.
Canadian foundations and charities are required to register with the federal
taxation department. The Foundation received its charitable status 29 April
1999. It was formed to raise funds to eradicate landmines around the world and
to end the human and economic suffering they cause. According to its interim
Executive Director, Scott Fairweather, the foundation is believed to be the
first private sector foundation in the world totally dedicated to this purpose.
It was felt there was a need for such an organization because, “there was
a concern that governments’ commitment and evolvement to this issue might
not last the length of time needed for the issue. That the government itself
did not have the resources necessarily to deal with the issue so the Canadian
Landmine Foundation formed to generate interest and funding from the private
sector and other communities in
Canada.”[70]
One area of focus for the Foundation will be supporting mine action in the
Americas. Fairweather believes the Foundation has an obligation to help
“clean up our own backyard” until the Americas are mine
free.[71] To date this has
resulted in a contribution of C$100,000 (US$68,000) to the Organization of
American States (OAS) demining efforts in Nicaragua. This phase of the OAS
program is due to be finished at the end of June 2000. Future funding for the
OAS demining program in Nicaragua is possible but is dependent upon a detailed
final report. In June 2000 the Foundation announced a one-time contribution of
C$13,633 (US$9270) to support OAS work and activities in the rehabilitation of
landmine victims in Central America. The funds will be added to funds raised at
a charity event hosted in May by the OAS “Women of the Americas,” a
non-profit organization chaired by the wife of the OAS Secretary General, Ana
Milena de Gaviria.[72]
On 6 June 2000 the Canadian Landmine Foundation launched two major
initiatives. One was an “e-philanthropy” approach to raising money,
called Clear Landmines.[73] The
Foundation liked the innovative approach of raising funds through advertising on
the Internet while at the same time not costing potential donors' any money. It
is a new approach, which has been successful in raising awareness and funds for
issues such as hunger, peace, the rainforest and cancer.
Also launched on 6 June 2000 was Adopt-A-Minefield Canada (TM). The
Foundation entered into an agreement with the United Nations Association of the
USA, Inc. to raise Canadian funds for countries where the Adopt-A-Minefield
program exists. Currently those are Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Cambodia,
Mozambique and Afghanistan.
The Foundation has signed an agreement with Mines Advisory Group (MAG) to
work together on mine action in the Middle East, with details to be worked out
in the months to come. The Canadian Landmine Foundation has set aside C$100,000
(US$68,000) for work in the region. The Foundation and MAG are negotiating
terms of reference for potential project partners. Canada’s missions in
Tel Aviv and Ramallah are providing assistance in these negotiations.
Canadian Landmine Action Fund
In 1998 Mines Action Canada and the Mine Action Team at DFAIT created the
Canadian Landmine Action Fund as another mechanism through which Canadians can
financially contribute. Funds raised through the Youth Mine Action Ambassador
Program are generally donated to this fund. On 3 December 1999 the first check
from this fund was presented to the Canadian International Demining Centre
(CIDC) to support the training and maintenance of the mine detection dog
program. C$30,000 (US$20,190)
Canadian Red Cross Society
Tajikistan: The Canadian Red Cross Society (CRCS) operates a large
orthopedic project under a delegated project arrangement with the ICRC. The
annual funding of $790,000 (US$537,200) comes solely from private donations to
the CRCS. The orthopedic program in Tajikistan is an important institution for
the country and the amputees, which it serves. A 1997 initial survey identified
an estimated 3,000 amputees throughout the country. On 21 March 1999 the first
prosthetic was produced. Since March 1999 there have been 366 new patients
registered. There were 188 new patients fitted with prostheses.
Countermine Research and Development
Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technologies (CCMAT) operates out of the
Defence Research Establishment Suffield (DRES) in Medicine Hat, Alberta. DRES
provides access to sophisticated test-and-evaluation (T&E) facilities.
Testing and evaluation undertaken by CCMAT is done on behalf of Industry Canada
(IC) to support the development of new technologies in mine action, particularly
detection and clearance. IC's primary role with respect to mine action is to
market viable technologies developed under the auspices of CCMAT.
With regard to Canadian R&D in clearance technologies and other equipment
for mine action, perhaps the most significant contribution is the development of
“surrogate” mines for use in the test and evaluation of equipment.
Universal acceptance of these devices could reduce the need for the use and
stockpiling (as allowed under Article 3 of the MBT) of live mines. The surrogate
mines are formally referred to as “reproduction mines” and have been
developed for four common mines -- PMA-1, PMA-2, PMA-3 and Type 72. “The
reproduction mines duplicate these types in shape, size, weight, fuse principle
and trigger force characteristics without the explosive content,” says Dr.
Bob Suart, Director of the CCMAT. “The need for these reproduction mines
was determined by CCMAT, as were the requirement and the concept; the
engineering was designed by an outside company. The reproduction mines were
devised by CCMAT to get away from testing equipment with live
mines.”[74] The surrogate
mines were first used in June 2000. The Frangible Synthetic Leg is also in use
by CCMAT to develop and test protective gear.
Through its association with the Defence Research Establishment Suffield
(DRES), the CCMAT is able to provide basic research to Canadian companies who in
turn apply it to the design of equipment for use in mine action. Prototypes are
then sent to CCMAT for testing. CCMAT facilities are used for trials of
Canadian technologies and may, through the International Testing and Evaluation
Program (ITEP) in Europe, be used to test equipment developed elsewhere. ITEP's
role is to develop universal methodologies and standards for T&E and for
mine action technologies.
A problem often stated in reference to the research and development of
clearance technologies is that final products tend to be developed in a vacuum,
without basic research information or consulting those working in the field. As
a result, the adaptation of new technologies to environmental and other
conditions unique to each mine-affected area rarely takes places. Consequently,
funds and expertise are channeled into technologies that will not be of use in
the field.
To address this problem, in May 1999 CCMAT proposed the Demining Technologies
Information Forum (DTIF). “There's a lot of effort expended in both
R&D and test and evaluation of technologies. The idea behind the Forum is
to put forward ideas that might come to fruition,” said Suart.
“Other forums, such as ITEP are useful in testing and evaluating equipment
that is at the end of the development process. DTIF and ITEP can coordinate
activities in [development of clearance technologies] and provide a place where
scientists in both areas can compare
notes.”[75] DTIF will
publish findings from research on its web site and provide access to conference
documents, research findings and technology required for various aspects of mine
action. DTIF was founded by Canada and the European Union and ITEP was founded
by the U.S. and the European Commission.
A pilot project for ITEP in which CCMAT played a key role was the performance
test and evaluation of metal detectors. The British, Dutch and the U.S. were
also active in the tests. The U.S. procured three copies of each known metal
detector for use in the trials. At the CCMAT testing grounds all detectors were
run through a series of highly controlled tests to gauge levels of accuracy
based on speed and distance from the targets. Detectors were rated on their
operability and ease of maintenance and field tested in Cambodia and Croatia.
The results of the tests will be published jointly in October 2000 or late fall.
Detector trials, under the auspices of the Mine Action Planning Afghanistan
(MAPA), also took place in Afghanistan with the assistance of CCMAT staff. MAPA
has not yet published the results of these tests.
An explosive for destroying mines in situ (FIXOR) and a mechanical
neutralization device (PRO MAC) are two Canadian developed technologies that
show promise for use in mine action. Both have been tested by CCMAT.
Landmine Casualties and Survivor Assistance
Canada is not a mine-affected country. However some
former or active Canadian Force Bases have been used as practice or training
ranges. In both Article 7 reports Canada lists the areas where defused mines
have been placed for testing clearance technologies at the Canadian Forces Base
Suffield, in Alberta. The locations of mined areas are given in UTM Grid
References.[76]
The majority of Canadians injured or killed by landmines have been members of
the Canadian Forces active in overseas military operations, peacekeeping duties
or mine clearance.[77] Benefits
guaranteed by law to persons with disabilities include health and medical care,
training, rehabilitation and counseling, employment and participation in
decisions affecting
themselves.[78]
[1] Canada became the first country known
to have charged a citizen with a violation of MBT implementation legislation.
In July 1999, a raid of a private home reportedly resulted in the confiscation
of a large number of weapons, including landmines. Police arrested a 47-year
old Canadian man who was released on CND$5,000 bail the following day and is
scheduled to appear in court 23 August 2000. Mike McIntyre, "Weapons cache
included mines, machine guns," Winnipeg Free Press, 25 July 1999; "Bus driver
gets bail," Winnipeg Free Press, 27 July 1999; interviews with various sources,
June 2000. [2] Landmine Monitor Report
1999, pp. 221-224. Statutes of Canada, Chapter 33, An Act to Implement the
Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer
of Antipersonnel Mines and on their Destruction; Bill C-22, Assented to 27
November 1997. For more on the provision in the Act related to joint military
operations, and the related “understanding” submitted with the
ratification instrument, see below in “Use”
section. [3] Notes for an address by
Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy to a Newsmakers Breakfast, Ottawa, 3
December 1999. [4] DFAIT, press release
No. 129, “Axworthy Appoints Ambassador for Mine Action,” 22 May
1998, Ottawa. [5] Notes for an address
by Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy to the FMSP, Maputo Mozambique, 3 May
1999; Press release, No. 96, “Axworthy calls for post-conflict mine action
capability in areas such as Kosovo,” 3 May
1999. [6] The most recent Article 7
report submitted should be considered the
standard. [7] OAS, Register on
Antipersonnel Landmines, submitted by Peter M. Boehm, Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of the Permanent Mission of Canada to the OAS, OES/Ser. G,
CP/CSH-190/00 add. 1., 14 April
1999. [8] Statement by Lloyd Axworthy,
“Canada and Russia: Human Security and Northern Policy,” St.
Petersburg, Russia, 2 February 2000. [9]
Notes for an address by Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy to A Newsmakers
Breakfast, Ottawa, 3 December 1999; Statement by Lloyd Axworthy, on the
acceptance of the Endicott Peabody Award, Boston Massachusetts, 22 October
1999. [10] Notes for an address by
Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy to the FMSP, Maputo Mozambique, 3 May
1999; Press release, No. 96, “Axworthy calls for post-conflict mine action
capability in areas such as Kosovo,” 3 May
1999. [11]
Ibid. [12] Statement by Daniel
Livermore, Ambassador for Mine Action, to the 54th Session of the UNGA, Item 35:
Mine Action, New York, New York, 18 November
1999. [13] Statement by Foreign Affairs
Minister Lloyd Axworthy, to the Paasikivi Society, Helsinki, Finland, 1
September 1999; Statement by Lloyd Axworthy, “Canada and Russia: Human
Security and Northern Policy,” St. Petersburg, Russia, 2 February
2000. [14] Statement by Bob Lawson,
Senior Policy Advisor/Deputy Coordinator for Mine Action, at the First Annual
Conference of States Parties to the Amended Protocol II CCW, Geneva, 15 December
1999. [15]
Ibid. [16] Press release, #109,
“Axworthy announces support for global landmine watchdog,” 19 May
2000. [17] Notes for an address by
Foreign Affairs Minister Lloyd Axworthy to the FMSP, Maputo, Mozambique, 3 May
1999. [18]
Ibid. [19] Press Release, No. 141,
“Axworthy welcomes progress on democracy and human security at OAS General
Assembly,” 6 June 2000. [20]
Statement, Lloyd Axworthy, 22 October 1999 on the acceptance of the Endicott
Peabody Award, Boston,
Massachusetts. [21] Reports on Mines
Action Canada’s capacity building workshops are available at
http://www.minesactioncanada.org. [22]
Figures supplied by YMAAP
Secretariat. [23] Available at:
http://www.lm-online.org. [24] Statement
by Bob Lawson, Senior Policy Advisor/Deputy Coordinator for Mine Action, to the
First Annual Conference of States Parties to the Amended Protocol II of the CCW,
Geneva, 15 December 1999. [25] Annual
Report of Canada in Accordance with Article 13, paragraph 4 of Protocol II as
Amended on 3 May 1996, 10 December
1999. [26] Statement by Bob Lawson,
Senior Policy Advisor/Deputy Coordinator for Mine Action, to the First Annual
Conference of States Parties to the Amended Protocol II of the CCW, Geneva, 15
December 1999. [27] Statement by Mike
Moher, Canadian Ambassador to the CD, January
1999. [28] Government news release,
No.5, on the announcement of comprehensive, unilateral moratoria on the
production, export and operational use of AP mines by Canada, 17 January 1996.
Other sources indicate production halted in 1994. See, Mark Abley, The Gazette,
Montreal, 17 November 1994; Jane’s Military Vehicles and Logistics,
1994-95, p.175. See also Article 7 Reports, Canada, 27 August 1999 and 27 April
2000, http://domino.un.org/ottawa [29]
CCMAT Project Charter, October
1998. [30]
Ibid. [31]
Ibid. [32] Mines Action Canada, letter
to ministers of foreign affairs, defense, international cooperation and
industry, copied to CCMAT director, 29 January
1999. [33] Telephone interview with Dr.
Bob Suart, Director of CCMAT, 28 June
2000. [34]
Ibid. [35]
Ibid. [36] Valerie Warmington, CCMAT
Work on Alternatives to AP Landmines Summary,
undated. [37] Fax from Kristeva Zoe,
Political and Multilateral Issues, DFAIT-ILX, 11 February
1999. [38] This issue was discussed at
the SCE on General Status of the Convention meetings in January and May 2000 in
Geneva. Not only the prohibition on transfer must be considered, but also the
prohibition on assisting anyone in a prohibited
act. [39] Statement by Daniel Livermore
to the 54th Session of the UNGA, Item 35: Mine Action, 18 November 1999, New
York. [40] Press release No. 262, 1
December 1999, “Axworthy marks landmine anniversary in Ottawa”;
Notes for an address by The Honourable Lloyd Axworthy, Minister of Foreign
Affairs to a Newsmakers Breakfast, 3 December 1999, Ottawa,
Canada. [41] Telephone interview with
Col. Normand Levert, Liaison Officer to the Mine Action Team (ILX), 23 February
1999; telephone interview with Lt. Col. J.P. Chabot, Directorate of Arms and
Proliferation Control Policy, 23 February 1999; telephone interview with Major
Perrin, April 1998; LM-MAC/Fredenburg, February
1999. [42] Article 7 Report, Form D,
submitted 27 April 2000, for the period 1 August 1999-14 March
2000. [43]
Ibid. [44] Telephone interview with
Major Perrin, April 1998; MAC/Fredenburg, Feb 1999; MAC/Levert, Feb
1999. [45] Article 7 Report, Form D,
submitted 27 August 1999, for the period 1 January 1999-31 July
1999. [46] Article 7 Report, Form D,
submitted 27 April 2000. [47] Ibid, Form
C. [48] Ibid, Form
D. [49] Press Release No. 134,
“Axworthy and Minna announce funding for landmine projects in the
Americas,” 4 June 2000. [50]
Dennis Bueckert, “Canadian Forces issued mines despite campaign,”
The Ottawa Citizen newspaper, 14 February 2000. See also “Les Canadiens
sont equips de mines,” Le Journal de Québec, 14 Février
2000. [51] Letter from Mines Action
Canada to Minister of Foreign Affairs Lloyd Axworthy, 18 February 2000. The
letter was accompanied by a two-page
backgrounder. [52] Letter from Minister
Lloyd Axworthy to Mines Action Canada, received 23 June 2000. MAC has received
contradictory information from different sources about whether modifications can
or have been made to ensure the Claymore mines in Canadian stockpiles cannot be
fitted with a booby-trap or made to be victim
activated. [53] Article 7 reports and
report to the CCW amended protocol II, 10 December 1999. However, it was
reported to MAC, that on at least two different occasions, at an event in the
spring of 2000 in Montreal, Quebec and another in British Colombia,
representatives of the Department of National Defence have dismissed the Mine
Ban Treaty said that Canada would use AP mines in a conflict, which raises
concern about how well Canada's position is being communicated to the lower
ranks of the Canadian Forces. The Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade is reported to be looking into the
matter. [54] Convention on the
Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel
Mines and on Their
Destruction,.C.N.473.1997.TREATIES-2 [55]
Statutes of Canada, Chapter 33, An Act to Implement the Convention on the
Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel
Mines and on their Destruction; Bill C-22, Assented to 27 November
1997. [56] Email communication from Bob
Lawson, Senior Policy Advisor, ILX-DFAIT, received 15 March
1999. [57] Speech made by Prime Minister
Jean Chrétien to the Opening Plenary of the Ottawa Treaty Signing
Conference, 3 December 1997. For a description of the Canadian Landmine Fund
see 1999 Landmine Monitor, Canada report, p.235; UN Mine Action Investment
Database (www.un.org/Depts/dpko/mine/). The exchange rate used is C$1 =
$US0.6730. This is the official exchange rate used by the Canadian government
for 1999-2000 in its reports to the UN Mine Action Investment
database. [58] FY 1999-2000 figure is
based on the total of the projects detailed in this report (C$26,021,215).
FY1998-1999 figure is as reported by the government of Canada in the UN Mine
Action Investment Database for the year 1998. Canada has reported US$15.4
million for 1999 in the UN
database. [59] Available at:
www.mines.gc.ca. [60] “Seeds of
Terror Seeds of Hope, 1998-199 Report on the Canadian Landmine Fund,”
report submitted to the Canadian Parliament by the Minister of Foreign Affairs
and International Trade, 3 December 1999. p.
26. [61] Mines Action Canada
files. [62]
Ibid. [63] See
www.mines.gc.ca/english/documents/measeng-final.htm [64]
Ibid. [65] Copies of the draft Canadian
guidelines were circulated to Canadian NGOs in March and April 2000
meetings. [66] The Mine Action Team
presented the Canadian Mine Action Guidelines and Canadian Mine Action Progress
Indicators during a consultation meeting on mine action, held in Ottawa, Canada,
17 March 2000. The consultations also included presentations by key Canadian
mine action organizations on: plans and priorities for the fiscal year
2000/2001, made by key Canadian mine action organizations; as well as Canadian
mine action capacities. [67] Andrew
Mitrovica, “Landmine chaos give Canada ‘black eye,’” The
Globe and Mail, (Canadian newspaper) 14 June 2000. p.
1. [68] Andrew Mitrovica,
“Canada's delay in mine crisis puts many at risk, officials say,”
The Globe and Mail, (Canadian newspaper) 15 June 2000. p.
A5. [69] Notes for an address by the
Honourable Lloyd Axworthy to the Empire Club, Toronto, 28 June
1999. [70] Telephone interview with
Scott Fairweather, Interim Executive Director, Canadian Landmine Foundation, 16
June 2000. [71]
Ibid. [72] Press release 5 June
2000 [73] Available at:
www.clearlandmines.com. [74] Telephone
interview with Dr. Bob Suart, Director of CCMAT, 28 June
2000. [75] Telephone interview with Dr.
Bob Suart, Director of CCMAT, 18 June
2000. [76] Article 7 Reports, Form C, 27
August 1999 and 27 April 2000. [77] See
Landmine Monitor 1999 p. 239 for more
details. [78] See Canadian submission to
the United Nations global Survey on Disability Policy, 15 September 1996,
www.independentliving.org/Library