Key developments
since March 1999: Existing law was amended on 17 July 1999 to prohibit the
export and transit of antipersonnel mines. In March 2000, the Foreign Ministry
said that Estonia has less than 1,000 AP mines in its stockpile, which are used
for training purposes. Estonia acceded to CCW Amended Protocol II on 20 April
2000.
Mine Ban Policy
Estonia has not signed the Mine Ban Treaty (MBT),
despite making statements in favor of a comprehensive ban on antipersonnel
mines, and voting in favor of all pro-ban UN General Assembly resolutions.[1] According to an official at the
Foreign Ministry, Estonia is concerned that there may be problems with
verification of other countries’ compliance with provisions of the MBT.
Estonia does not exclude the possibility of joining the MBT, although not in the
near future.[2]
Because of its occupation under the Soviet Union, there remains a perceived
need for secure defenses, but limited defense budgets preclude acquiring the
expensive defense systems thought necessary to substitute for AP mines. At
present, there are poor diplomatic relations with Russia, with attacks on the
Estonian embassy in Moscow. In this situation, traditional arguments by the
military that antipersonnel mines can be an inexpensive and efficient method of
slowing massive land invasion are persuasive, despite the small size of actual
AP mine stocks in Estonia and the lack of recent production capacity. Although
responsible officials recognize that in practice the long-term humanitarian
costs of AP mines greatly outweigh their short-term military value, this has yet
to be translated into acceptance of the
ban.[3]
There are periodic security consultations between Estonia and Finland, and
Estonia closely follows Finnish policy on the landmine
issue,[4] although the Ministry
of Defense insists that there is no need to link the Estonian position on the AP
mine issue to that of any other
country.[5]
Estonia did not attend the First Meeting of States Parties of the MBT in
Maputo, Mozambique in May 1999. It has not sent representatives to any of the
MBT’s intersessional meetings of the Standing Committees of Experts.
Estonia acceded to Amended Protocol II (Landmines) of the Convention on
Conventional Weapons on 20 April
2000.[6] Estonia would prefer
that a ban evolve through the Conference on Disarmament (CD). This remains the
government position, as stated in its report to the OSCE:
The Conference on Disarmament has a clear mandate to address conventional
disarmament issues. As part of this mandate, the Government of Estonia believes
the CD has a role to play in strengthening the existing international regime
against anti-personnel landmines. The Conference counts all key countries as
its members and also provides for the possibility of active participation by
non-members. An APL transfer ban negotiated by the CD would only enhance the
task of implementing a global regime against land-mines. Estonia welcomes the
initiative of those countries who promote the Conference on Disarmament action
on an APL transfer ban and regrets that during its 1999 session the Conference
was not able to establish an appropriate mechanism to deal with this issue. The
Government of Estonia hopes that a Special Co-ordinator is re-appointed and
consultations start during the early party of the Conference’s next
session.[7]
Production, Transfer and Stockpile
According to the Ministries of Defence and Foreign
Affairs, Estonia is not now producing AP mines and has not produced them in the
past.[8] The “Weapons
Act” of 1 January 1996 was amended on 17 July 1999 to prohibit the export
and transit of AP mines, related technologies and materials.[9]
In March 2000, the Foreign Ministry said that Estonia has less than 1,000 AP
mines in its stockpile, which are used for training
purposes.[10]
Landmine Problem and Mine Clearance
Landmines and other explosives left from military
operations during World War II and from the Soviet occupation have been cleared
from Estonian islands in the Baltic Sea, notably from Pakri and Naissaar, which
were used as military test sites by the Soviet army. After these clearance
operations there are no more “closed areas” in Estonia. Mines and
UXO found occasionally in various parts of Estonia are destroyed by the Rescue
Board, a division of the Ministry of Interior that employs about twenty people
to perform clearance operations, and which has received British, Swedish and
U.S. assistance. There is also a group of well-trained demining specialists in
the Estonian Defense Forces, which the government has proposed could be involved
in conflict zones elsewhere in the
world.[11]
Mine Action and Victim Assistance
In 1999 Estonia contributed US$2,000 to the UN
Voluntary Trust Fund for Assistance in Mine
Clearance.[12] Officials of the
Foreign Ministry said that Estonia is willing to contribute one platoon-sized
unit for mine clearance in mine-affected countries. Estonian officers serving
in SFOR missions have successfully participated in clearance of minefields in
Bosnia. The preferred framework for such assistance would be the Demining 2010
Initiative.[13]
During recent years there have been no mine accidents, but accidents with
UXOs still occur. In 1999, several schoolchildren were injured on an island near
Tallinn when they attempted to burn a mortar shell. It is possible that there
are landmine victims among Afghanistan war veterans. There are legal benefits
for disabled people, including any mine/UXO victims, and hospitals in Tallinn
and other towns can provide high quality
treatment.[14]
[1] For details of Estonia’s previous
statements on ban policy, see Landmine Monitor Report 1999, p.
778. [2] Interview with Malle Talvet,
Political Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tallinn, 10 March
2000. [3] Analysis formed from
interviews with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, January-March
2000. [4] Interview with Malle Talvet,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March
2000. [5] Interviews with Erik
Männik, Head of Defense Policy Planning, and Hestrid Tedder, Defense Policy
and Planning Department, Ministry of Defense, Tallinn, 10 March
2000. [6] E-mail messages from Hestrid
Tedder, Ministry of Defense, 3 May 2000, and from Malle Talvet, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, 8 May 2000. [7] Report
of the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 9 December 1999,
p.2. [8] Interview with Tiit Aleksejev,
Political Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tallinn, 20 January 1999; fax
message from Erik Männik, Ministry of Defense, 10 March
1999. [9] Report to the OSCE, 9 December
1999. It notes the following additional recently adopted or amended legislation
that regulates primarily the transfer, but also the use, production and storage
or destruction of AP mines in the Republic of Estonia: Strategic Goods Export
and Transit Act (17 July 1999), Regulation on Procedure for Export and Transit
of Strategic Goods (9 October 1999), Customs Act (19 January 1998, amended 31
October 1999), and Minister of Defence Regulation on Procedure for Procurement,
Storage, Conveyance and Carrying of Weapons and Munitions in the Area of
Government and of the Ministry of Defence (2 December
1997). [10] Interview with Malle Talvet,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March
2000. [11] Interview with Erik
Männik and Hestrid Tedder, Ministry of Defense, 10 March
2000. [12] Report to the OSCE, 9
December 1999, p. 2. [13] Interview with
Tiit Aleksejev, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tallinn, 20 January 1999; e-mail
message, 20 February 1999. [14]
Interview with Malle Talvet, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March
2000.