Key developments
since March 1999: Iceland ratified the MBT on 5 May 1999.
Mine Ban Policy
The Republic of Iceland signed the Mine Ban Treaty
on 4 December 1997 and ratified it on 5 May 1999. The treaty entered into force
for Iceland on 1 November 1999. National legislation to ensure implementation is
being prepared.[1] Iceland
voted in favor of the United Nations General Assembly pro-ban resolutions
1996-1998, and again in December 1999. It attended the First Meeting of States
Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in May 1999. It has not submitted its Article 7
report, which was due by 29 April 2000. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated
that Iceland views the Mine Ban Treaty as important, but does not play an active
role in its implementation
work.[2]
Iceland has no military forces of its own, but is a member of NATO and has a
bilateral defense agreement with the United States. This provides that the U.S.
will carry out the defense of Iceland in accordance with its responsibilities
under NATO and that Iceland will make all acquisitions of land and other
arrangements required to permit use of defense
facilities.[3] This leaves
unclear the question of whether Iceland, as an MBT State Party, would permit a
non-MBT party such as the U.S. to stockpile or transfer prohibited antipersonnel
mines on or through Icelandic territory, or assist U.S. forces with mine-related
activities prohibited under the MBT. However, when Iceland deposited its
instrument of ratification with the United Nations it made no additional
qualifying statement that would indicate that U.S. stockpiling or transfer of
antipersonnel mines in Iceland, or other assistance, would be regarded as
permissible.
Iceland does not produce, transfer or use landmines, and maintains no
landmine stockpiles.[4] It is
not landmine-affected, although sea mines from World War II occasionally wash up
on its shores.[5]
Iceland has stated that it will focus its contributions to mine action on
victim assistance programs, and in 1997 granted US$1.3 million for mine victim
assistance in Bosnia and Herzegovina, to provide prostheses. By June 2000 just
under US$1 million has been spent on
this.[6]
[1] E-mail from A. Edda Jokullsdottir,
Political Affairs Desk, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 June
2000. [2] Telephone interview with
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 20 June
2000. [3] Ministry of Foreign Affairs
information available at:
http://brunnur.stjr.is/interpro/utanr/utn-eng.nsf. [4]
E-mail from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 June
2000. [5] See, Landmine Monitor Report
1999, p. 711. [6] E-mail from Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, 30 June 2000.