Key developments
since March 1999: Latvia has announced that it has 4,500 antipersonnel
mines in stockpile. During 1999 the Ministry of Defense decided to shift
primarily to command-detonated AP mines or antitank mines. Mines and UXO remain
a substantial problem, but there are few resources for clearance.
Mine Ban Policy
Although Latvia has not signed the 1997 Mine Ban
Treaty (MBT), officials attended many meetings of the “Ottawa
Process” leading to the MBT. The Foreign Ministry confirmed in January
2000 that Latvia welcomes the efforts of the international community to stop the
use of antipersonnel mines and, eventually, to eliminate all deployed and
stockpiled AP mines. The government considers that the MBT is the most decisive
political step ever taken in this
respect.[1]
The Foreign Ministry insists that Latvia meets the MBT requirements, although
it has not signed the treaty: AP mines are not produced in Latvia, and there are
no minefields on the borders or elsewhere. The existing small number of AP
mines is estimated to be sufficient for training purposes for no longer than the
next several years.[2]
Latvia did not send observers to the First Meeting of States Parties in May
1999, but the Foreign Ministry states that it closely followed developments
there and studied the related
documents,[3] including the
Landmine Monitor Report 1999, which is considered a valuable
resource.[4] Latvia has voted
in favor of all the pro-ban resolutions at the United Nations General
Assembly.
The National Armed Forces have held that AP mines are useful to protect
strategic objects, and that combined with antitank mines they are considered an
efficient tool in the case of massive land invasion.The Baltic
countries’ shared history of invasion and occupation probably influences
these perceptions, as well as present-day uncertainties in the region. More
recently, military sources stated that while a direct military threat seems
unlikely now, until it joins NATO Latvia would be isolated in the event of a
conflict, and therefore AP mines provide “psychological
security.”[5] But it is
accepted now in military circles that AP mines do more harm to the civilian
population than the aggressor, particularly if they are not the newer
self-destruct type, and pose little of an obstacle to a modern
army.[6] The Foreign Ministry
confirmed that Latvia's position on the MBT prohibition of AP mines is highly
influenced by the regional context, especially the policies of neighboring
countries such as Finland, Russia and
Belarus.[7]
Latvia signed the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Protocol II in
1993, but it has never ratified the Convention or its Amended Protocol II (1996)
on landmines. Latvia is not a member of the Conference of Disarmament, but would
support negotiations there on the issue of AP
mines.[8]
Production, Stockpile and Transfer
Officials state that Latvia is not producing and
has not previously produced antipersonnel mines; all mines of the Latvian armed
forces are Soviet in origin.[9]
Early in 1999, the National Armed Forces said it held approximately 20,000 mines
in stockpiles.[10] But in
January 2000, the Foreign Ministry stated that remaining stocks total
4,500.[11] This difference has
been explained in terms of the larger figure including antitank mines while the
smaller figure represents those AP mines that cannot be adapted to
command-detonation and would have to be destroyed under the MBT
prohibition.[12] During 1999
the Ministry of Defense changed its policy away from non-command detonated AP
mines and put the emphasis on antitank mines; the plan (approved at the end of
1999) is for each engineering platoon to have “controllable” (that
is, command-detonated) mines or antitank mines. It has been concluded that most
of the AP mines can be converted to command-detonation
mode.[13]
In September 1995 an indefinite export moratorium on AP mines was imposed,
which the Foreign Ministry says will be confirmed in a new law by the end of
2000. Transfer of AP mines requires approval by the Latvian Strategic Goods
Control Committee. Existing regulations require several licenses for the
transit of strategic, military and dual-use goods. A transit license through
Latvian territory is issued only if the authorities are in possession of a
corresponding export license of the exporting country and import license of the
importing country. It is said to be doubtful that such transit would be
authorized in the case of AP
mines.[14]
Use
There is no evidence of new use of AP mines by
Latvian Armed Forces. But in Latvia, as in other Baltic countries, explosives
sometimes including antipersonnel mines are used by criminal elements.
According to the Latvian State and Riga City
Police,[15] the number of such
incidents is decreasing, from a total of 67 in 1995, to 35 by 1999. Most of
these incidents caused death, injury and serious damage to vehicles or
buildings. Most were targeted on other criminal elements involved in
“business disputes.”
Landmine Problem and Mine Action
Mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) left from
World Wars I and II and from the Soviet occupation remain a substantial problem
today in Latvia; the absence of assistance by Germany or Russia in clearing
these “remnants of war” is sometimes put forward as a reason for
reluctance to join the Mine Ban Treaty. Large areas of agricultural land still
are closed to civilian use. To determine locations polluted by explosives,
Latvia has used a methodology elaborated in 1998 by the Ministry of
Environmental Protection and Regional Development. The classification includes
nine levels of pollution; according to Ministry of Defense data there are about
60,000 polluted areas[16]
covering approximately 100,000
hectares.[17] Areas intensively
contaminated by mines and UXO are marked by signs and partially guarded. Every
year EOD (explosive ordnance disposal) teams of the Armed Forces neutralize or
dispose of more than 3,000 explosive items, as detailed in Landmine Monitor
Report 1999.[18]
Destruction of such explosives continues and between January-September 1999,
Homeguard Units (a voluntary defense organization under the National Armed
Forces) destroyed 2,847 such
devices.[19]
Eight army officers and instructors were honored for their work in destroying
4,500 explosive items during 1999. Among them was Zane Silina, the only woman
deminer, who destroyed more than 1,000 explosives in 1999. She says that the
most active time of year is spring, but even in winter there is much disposal
work to be done due to increased construction; many explosives are found on
construction sites in Latvian
towns.[20]
In the Zvarde region which was heavily contaminated in World War II and
later used as a Soviet military test site, there are about 580 peasant families
who still cannot return to their homes. According to one Homeguard deminer,
Andris Rieksts, during the first two months of 2000 there were six calls from
returning peasants for clearance. Zigurds Firers, Head of the District Council
of Saldus, said construction of roads is necessary for this region of rich
arable land. Gaidis Zeibots (of the National Armed Forces at that time) says
that Zvarde region could be used as a real-life training ground for NATO
deminers.[21]
According to an official of the Armed Forces, the concentration and depth of
explosives in Cekule (Riga district) is such that complete clearance would
require resources comparable to several annual defense budgets. In Cekule about
4.3 million cubic meters of soil will have to be moved in the clearance
operation, and there is the question of whether this makes
sense.[22]
Since 1995 there has been little state funding for demining and EOD
operations. Local government funding for equipment has decreased from
approximately US$4,000 to US$3,000 annually. State funding exceeded US$16,000
in 1999. For seriously affected regions there are very scarce government
subsidies; for example, state financing for Zvarde region totals only about
US$5,000 per year. Due to insufficient financing local governments are able to
cover the costs only partially. One consequence is that there are no commercial
demining companies in Latvia. Assistance has been provided in recent years by
the United States, Norway and
Denmark.[23]
Latvian Armed Forces are training EOD personnel from the Latvian Homeguard
Units, Navy and Ministry of the Interior personnel. About 200 Homeguard and ten
professional deminers are able to participate in operations (except at sea).
There have been problems with equipment, but this situation improved in 1999
when German equipment was purchased by the State. Generally there has been no
international assistance for EOD and demining activities in Latvia. In 1999
talks started on a longterm Norwegian-Latvian project to set up EOD Training
Centers in the Adazi district of Riga and in Liepaja, with significant financing
by Norway; this project is included in Latvia’s NATO Membership Action
Plan. The Centers should open in 2002, and as a result it is expected that
within a few years Latvia will employ only professional deminers and EOD
personnel. There is language training for Latvian military specialists under
the Latvian - Canadian Agreement on Military Cooperation, and there has been
other assistance in demining/EOD operations by Denmark and the United States.
The Ministries of Defense and of the Interior have also decided to establish a
joint training course to neutralize improvised explosive devices, with three
centers in Latvia.[24]
There are few mine awareness programs in Latvia. One Latvian nongovernmental
organization, the Baltic International Center of Human Education, previously
carried out a mine awareness project financed by Open Society Institute and
local organizations.[25] Latvia
has laws and social guarantees for disabled persons, including the victims of
mine and UXO accidents. Disabled people are treated primarily at the Institute
of Traumatology and Orthopedics (which was famous for its surgeons during the
Afghanistan war), the Center of Microsurgery, and the National Centre of
Rehabilitation in Vaivari, Jurmala (a former rehabilitation centre for Soviet
astronauts).
[1] Letter from the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, 20 January 2000. [2] Interview
with Ivars Apinis, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Riga, 20 January 2000; Report of
Latvia to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 21
January 2000, p. 3. [3] Letter from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 20 January
2000. [4] Interview with Ivars Apinis,
Riga, 20 January 2000. [5] Interviews
with Guntis Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, December 1998 and 1 March
2000. [6]
Ibid. [7] Letter from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, 20 January 2000; Report to the OSCE, 21 January 2000, p.
3. [8] Letter from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, 20 January 2000. [9]
Letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 20 January 2000; Report to the OSCE, 21
January 2000, p. 3. [10] Interview with
Guntis Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, January
1999. [11] Interview with Ivars Apinis,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Riga, 20 January
2000. [12] Telephone interview with
Guntis Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, 6 June
2000. [13] Interview with Guntis
Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, 1 March
2000. [14] Letter from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, 20 January 2000. [15]
Interview with Ieva Zvidre, Press Center of the Riga City Police Department,
Riga, February 1999, updated in telephone interview with Krists Leiškalns,
Latvian State Police Press Center, 5 May
2000. [16] Interview with Guntis
Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, 1 March
2000. [17] Report to the OSCE, 21
January 2000, p. 3. [18] Landmine
Monitor 1999, pp. 800-802. [19] Diena
(daily newspaper), 12 October 1999. [20]
Airis Rikvelis, “Best Army Deminers Honoured,” Neatkariga rita avize
(daily newspaper), 25 November
1999. [21] Latvian Radio report, 1 March
2000. [22] Interview with Guntis
Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, 15 February
2000. [23] Interviews with Guntis
Aizporietis, National Armed Forces, Riga, 20 January and 15 February
2000. [24] Ibid; Interviews with Guntis
Aizporietis and Egils Lescinsikis, National Armed Forces, Riga, January 1999;
visit to the National Armed Forces Headquarters, Riga, 1 March
2000. [25] Baltic International Center
for Human Education, webpage www.bc-cfp.lv.