Key developments
since March 1999: Panama has not submitted its Mine Ban Treaty Article 7
report, which was due 27 September 1999. Panama has clarified to Landmine
Monitor that it does not have a stockpile of antipersonnel mines.
Mine Ban Policy
Panama signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December
1997, and deposited its instrument of ratification with the UN on 7 October
1998. The ratification legislation literally adopts the treaty but cannot be
considered to be full implementation legislation with penalties for
violations.
Panama has not yet submitted its Article 7 transparency report, due by 27
September 1999, but officials say they are preparing the
report.[1]
Panama voted in favor of the pro-Mine Ban Treaty UN General Assembly
Resolution 54/54 B in December 1999, as it did on previous resolutions in 1997
and 1998. It has also supported the pro-ban resolutions of the Organization of
American States (OAS). It was one of nine nations to sign the
“Declaration of San José” in Costa Rica on 5 April 2000,
which has an article promoting the Mine Ban Treaty.
Panama sent a representative to the First Meeting of States Parties in Maputo
in May 1999 but did not make a statement to the
plenary.[2]It is not believed
to have participated in any of the intersessional meetings of the treaty in
Geneva.
Panama is a state party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and
ratified Amended Protocol II (Landmines) on 3 November 1999. Panama did not
participate in the December 1999 First Annual Conference of States Parties to
Amended Protocol II and has not submitted its Article 13 annual transparency
report.
Panama is not a member of the Conference on Disarmament.
Production, Transfer, Stockpiling, Use
According to government officials, Panama has never
produced, imported, or exported AP mines, and does not have a stockpile of AP
mines.[3] A government official
stated that there have been no reports of use of Panama as a transit point for
AP mine shipments going
elsewhere.[4]
Claymore mines were used in Panama for training of both Panamanian and U.S.
military personnel in the Canal
Zone.[5] There has been no new
mine use since the closing of the ranges.
A member of the National Police told Landmine Monitor of possible AP mine use
in the weapons trafficking and drug labs along the Panama-Colombia border, but
it was not possible to confirm this
allegation.[6]
UXO Problem
While Panama is not mine-affected, it does suffer
from UXO contamination as a result of U.S. training exercises and weapons
testing in military ranges in the Canal Zone for 30 years, until 1997 when the
ranges were closed down. One 1997 assessment by the U.S. Department of Defense
on the military ranges revealed the presence of various types of munitions,
including Claymore mines but no other types of AP mines.[7]A former U.S. Army official has
said that while the Army tested mines at three ranges, the testing included only
component and systems tests, with no high explosive in the
mines.[8]
The area of UXO-affected land in the Canal Zone is approximately 151.29
square kilometers and consists of ranges where weapons were tested and training
took place.[9] These include
the Empire demolition range where explosives were used, including Claymore
mines;[10] the Balboa West
range, and the Piña and Sherman
range.[11]
According to UNICEF, there are approximately 100,000 people in 15 districts
located around the ranges and therefore at risk from the presence of
UXO.[12]These include the
communities of Nuevo Emperador, Burunga, Arraiján, Huile, Piña,
Escobal, Providencia, and Bruja. The affected land has different uses including
agricultural, ecological tourism, health and medicine purposes, as well as
social purposes, such as housing, and income generation. Once the land is
cleared, it will be used according to the plan made by the local governmental
body, the Autoridad de la Región Interoceánica
(ARI).[13]
In compliance with the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, the U.S. Armed Forces
have affirmed they “will take all practicable measures to remove all
hazards to human life, health and safety.” The U.S. claims that when it
has completed the clean-up of the ranges, “some 12,119 of the 15,129
hectares will be available for Panama’s
reuse.”[14]In August
1999, U.S. Air Force Colonel David Hunt said that the military had removed 250
metric tons of debris in the last two years. He went on to note that it is
“impossible” to remove all the UXO without tearing down the rain
forests and threatening the canal’s
watershed.[15] On 31 December
1999, as stipulated by the 1977 treaty, the U.S. pulled out of Panama.
Mine Awareness
Since 1997, UNICEF has funded some UXO/mine
awareness and education, in coordination with the Ministry of
Health.[16]UNICEF has a
$44,000 proposal to conduct mine awareness and education in affected areas in
2000, in partnership with the Ministries of Health, Education, Foreign Affairs
and NGOs.[17] A number of NGOs
carry out research and advocacy on the UXO-contaminated ranges in the Canal
Zone.[18] At one point, the
ICRC was involved in UXO awareness and education and held a few
workshops.[19]
Mine and UXO Casualties
The Panamanian government states that at least 21
people have been killed by UXO since 1940, while the Pentagon says 7 deaths have
occurred since 1984.[20]
Those injured can obtain rehabilitation services at various public and
private hospitals. Most of these are in Panama City, but there are 1,175 health
clinics around the country, one university hospital, nine public integrated
hospitals, and also private
clinics.[21]
[1] Telephone interview with Janio
Tuñon, Director-General, Department of International Organizations and
Conferences, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 12 May
2000. [2] Panama was represented by S.E.
Sr. Flavio Mendez Altamirano, Director-General of International Organizations
and Conferences, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. [3] Inquires were made with the
following government agencies in May 2000: Interior Commerce Department of the
Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Explosives Technical Unit of the National
Police and the Institutional Department for Public Security Affairs, Ministry of
Government and Justice. Also, interview with Jaime Luque, Director,
Inter-Institutional Department on Public Safety Affairs, Ministry of Government
and Justice, Panama City, 2 May 2000. Landmine Monitor Report 1999 p. 275
stated that there was uncertainty about whether or not Panama had a stockpile of
AP mines. [4] Interview with Jaime
Luque, Ministry of Government and Justice, 2 May
2000. [5] PRC Environmental Management,
Inc. for Panama Canal Treaty Implementation Plan Agency, Department of Defense,
Unexploded Ordnance Assessment of U.S. Military Ranges in Panama: Empire, Balboa
West, and Piña Ranges, Final report, January 1997, Appendix A, p. A-15.
Hereafter cited as “PRC, UXO Assessment, January
1997.” [6] Interview with member
of National Police, Panama City, October
1999. [7] PRC, UXO Assessment, January
1997, Appendix A, p. A-15. [8] Telephone
interview with former munitions test official, March
2000. [9] PRC, UXO Assessment, January
1997, p. ES-1. [10] UXO in the Empire
range was described by one official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as
fitting the description of the M2M AP mine. See Letter from Juan Antonio Stagg,
Copresidente, Comite Conjunto-DEPAT, to Colonel Hunt, Copresidente, Comite
Conjunto-DEPAT, 29 May 1998. Landmine Monitor editor’s translation from
Spanish. [11] Sherman was not used as a
Firing Range, but it was used as a training camp. Useful reports on the ranges
include: PRC, UXO Assessment, January 1997; U.S. Army South, Installation
Condition Report, Empire Range – Military Area of Coordination, 11 July
1996; and, Range Transfer Report: Empire, Balboa West, and Piña Ranges:
Actions to Protect Public Safety & the Environment, A joint effort of U.S.
Army South, U.S. Air Combat Command, U.S. Technical Center for Explosive Safety,
U.S. Air Force Safety Center, U.S. Southern Command Treaty Implementation, U.S.
Army Environmental Center, U.S. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board,
29 October 1998. [12] UNICEF, “UXO
Awareness Education in Panama,” proposal for June-December 2000, in UN,
Portfolio of Mine-related Projects, June 2000, p.
128. [13] Autoridad de la Región
Interoceánica ARI, Plan de Uso General del Suelo,
1996. [14] Letter from Colonel David J.
Hunt, U.S. Air Force, Co-Chairman, Joint Committee, Center for Treaty
Implementation, Department of Defense, U.S. Southern Command, Corozal, Panama,
to Engineer Juan Antonio Stagg, JC# 152-98, 3 April
1998. [15] Andrea Stone, “Deadly
Reminders of U.S. in Panama,” USA Today, 9 August 1999, p.
7. [16] UNICEF, “UXO Awareness
Education in Panama,” proposal for June-December 2000, in United Nations,
Portfolio of Mine-related Projects, June 2000, p.
128. [17]
Ibid. [18] These include Servicio Paz y
Justicia en Panamá, Coordinadora de Derechos Humanos de Panamá,
Movimiento Nacional por la Defensa de la Soberanía, all human rights
NGOs, and CODIN, a women’s
NGO. [19] Interview with Marta
González, Director, National Permanent Commission for Implementation
of International Humanitarian Law, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Panama City, 12
May 2000. [20] Andrea Stone,
“Deadly Reminders of U.S. in Panama,” USA Today, 9 August 1999, p.
7. [21] Ministry of Health, 1999 Annual
Report, 1999.