Key developments
since March 1999: A Romanian company offered antipersonnel mines for sale
at an arms fair in the UK in September 1999; the government called the incident
a “regrettable error.”
Mine Ban Policy
When Romania signed the Mine Ban Treaty at the
opening ceremony in Ottawa on 3 December 1997, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Adrian Severin declared: “Our military experts have no reasons to consider
that antipersonnel landmines are essential to guarantee the security of
Romania.”[1] Yet, Romania
has not yet ratified the MBT.
In November 1999, the Minister of Defense Victor Babiuc stated that
“ratification started as a process and will finalize, probably in the
first half of the year
2000.”[2] In the same
month, the Foreign Ministry stated, “Romania is now in the process of
identifying the financial resources for the destruction of stockpiles, in order
to be able to ratify the
Convention.”[3] The
Defense Minister, on 15 February 2000, noted that because “the process of
ratification has been relatively recently released, there is no juridical act
drawn up....”[4]
In a meeting with the ICBL in October 1999, Romania’s Ambassador to the
UN, Mr. Ion Gorita, stated that even though ratification had not taken place,
Romania was committed to respect the provisions of the treaty and was in effect
already implementing the treaty: no use, no export, no production, beginning of
destruction of AP mine
stockpiles.[5]
Romanian nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) involved in the mine ban
campaign note that there had been regular changes of personnel in charge of the
signing and ratification process of the MBT, which may have simply resulted in
loss of continuity in the process overall, or may indicate disagreements over
the priority to be given to ratification of the MBT. Official responses to
inquiries have not been forthcoming from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Officials at the Ministry of Defense said they were unable to assist in the
research for Landmine Monitor. No clear and meaningful political support has
been expressed for speedy ratification of the MBT in Romania.
Romania attended the First Meeting of States Parties (FMSP) to the MBT in
Maputo, Mozambique, in May 1999, where the delegation commented on the financial
implications of implementing the MBT. It has participated in most meetings of
the intersessional meetings of the Standing Committees of Experts of the MBT,
with the exception of those related to victim assistance.
Romania voted in favor of the UN General Assembly Resolution 54/54B urging
full implementation of the MBT in December 1999, as it had with the previous
pro-ban UNGA resolutions in 1996, 1997, and 1998.
It is a party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) and in November
1999, it was announced that ratification was underway of the Amended Protocol II
(1996).[6] However, one month
later, Romania’s report to the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe (OSCE) stated “Romania has not signed or started the formal
adherence process to the Protocol
II.”[7] It attended as an
observer the First Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended Protocol II in
Geneva in December 1999.
Romania continues to support “complementary” negotiations in the
Conference on Disarmament to ban the transfer of antipersonnel
mines.[8]
Production and Stockpiling
In its December 1999 report to the OSCE, Romania
stated that it does not produce AP
mines.[9] Officials have said
that production stopped in
1990.[10] Concerning past
production, the Ministry of Defense has confirmed the accuracy of the list of
seven types of AP mines presented in the Landmine Monitor Report
1999[11] and offered further
data on their technical characteristics. The number of these AP mines currently
in stockpiles is not known, but it is thought to be
substantial.[12]
The government has stated that the costs of stockpile destruction are a
factor influencing MBT ratification and Romania has asked for financial
assistance to destroy its stocks.[13] In June 1999 the Chief of the
Defense Staff arranged for Romanian experts to visit Austria to discuss
stockpile destruction; the trip included a tour of “the premises of
UXO-experts as well as a visit to an industrial destruction site at Radmer
(private company).”[14]
In October 1999, Romania’s UN Ambassador told the ICBL that stockpile
destruction began in 1998, but there has been no confirmation of or further
information about this.[15]
Transfer
A moratorium on the transfer of AP mines was
declared on 1 July 1995. The export moratorium was extended until 15 September
2000, but plans for future extensions have not been
reported.[16] This prohibition
did not prevent the Romanian company Romtechnica from offering AP mines for sale
in September 1999 at the Defence Systems and Equipment Exhibition International
(DSEi) at Chertsey in the United Kingdom. Seven types of mine were being
offered, three of which were AP mines: the MAI-75 pressure mine, the MS-3
“Surprise Mine” (formerly designated as the ML-3), and the Leaping
Splinter Mine (MSS). Although no details are available to further identify this
latter, previously unknown, device, it is considered likely to be a bounding
fragmentation AP mine.
The Romtehnica sales representative made it clear to a researcher from the UK
who attended the Exhibition that the items were for sale. A color brochure was
available for the MS-3 Surprise Mine, which included its technical details. The
brochure states that the mine has a dual purpose: it is an anti-lift device and
a standard mine. Also available was a List of Romanian Defense Industry
Products, which included the other two AP mines, the MSS and the MAI-75.
The UK Working Group on Landmines was informed, and police and customs
officials contacted. The issue was widely reported in the press, both in
Romania and in the UK. The Romanian authorities explained the incident as a
simple error in documentation. Col. Florian Ionica, Romtechnica’s General
Manager, told a news conference that two marketing managers had been dismissed
and the commercial manager disciplined over an “error of information....
The list, which is not a commercial offer, contained two types of anti-personnel
mines produced in the past, but not in current production for either internal
use or export.... The inclusion of these two models is a regrettable error for
which Romtechnica assumes full
responsibility.”[17]
In the UK, in a Written Answer to a Parliamentary Question, the Minister of
State for the Armed Forces said:
Following allegations in the British media that a Romanian company was
promoting anti-personnel landmines at DSEi, we instructed the MOD Police to
investigate the matter. Separately, the Romanian authorities have contacted the
MOD to explain that, in error, their company had on its stand literature, which
mentioned an anti-personnel landmine. They have informed us that they stopped
manufacturing this item in 1990, but that the company had not updated its
equipment lists. We have received an apology from the Romanian authorities, but
the MOD Police are still investigating the matter and will submit a file to the
Crown Prosecution Service in due
course.[18]
At each stage of these official explanations, the incident changes: from
three AP mines actually on sale, to two (Ionica’s press conference), to
one (Romanian explanation to the UK), and from a direct offer of sale to the
“mere” inclusion in a list apparently not updated for almost ten
years. The explanations are further called into question by a news report that
quoted Romtechnica managers as saying that the sales list had been
“conceived especially for this
event.”[19] Also, a mine
clearance expert reports having seen AP mines listed in the Romtechnica sales
catalogues at military exhibition in Delhi in March
1998.[20]
NGO Activity
It was the Romtechnica incident that prompted the
involvement of the NGO Sibienii Pacifisti (People of Sibiu for Peace) in
the landmine issue. The NGO has called upon the authorities to prepare
an Article 7 report, even before ratification, as demonstration of the
government’s serious commitment to the MBT, but this was ignored.
Additionally, to try to speed up the process of ratification, Sibienii
Pacifisti addressed two open letters to the Parliament to provide an
opportunity for Members of Parliament to call for the ratification process to be
prioritized. Although this caught the attention of the press for a few days,
there was no clear response from the
Government.[21]
To increase public pressure on this issue, a Working Group was formed,
focusing on three tasks: to collect information on AP mines appearing in the
Romanian press; to contact public officials and others who are involved in this
issue; and to provide research for the Landmine Monitor Report 2000. A series
of conferences and other activities were organized, especially for academics but
also for all representatives of civil society to build public awareness. One
particular effort is to find sponsors for its program of assistance to mine
victims.
On 27 December 1999 a new Open Letter was addressed this time to the
Presidency of Romania, Parliament, Government, Foreign Ministry, Defense
Ministry, the Embassies of the accredited states in Bucharest, and to all media
and press agencies in Romania. This letter called again for the speeding up of
ratifying the MBT and requested approval to contact representatives of the
Ministries, institutions and relevant companies. The response has been very
poor, with the only positive response from the German Consulate in Sibiu. In
general, the civilian population as well as politicians are not well informed
about the effects of AP mines, perhaps partly because Romania has not been
affected by mines.
Mine Action
Romania has made contributions to several mine
action programs in recent years: to Angola, with one engineers platoon and
vehicle from 1995 to 1997, to Bosnia-Herzegovina with one engineering platoon
and associated vehicles and equipment, and to Albania with two engineer squads
and vehicles in 1997. In Bosnia-Herzegovina, Romania spent over $330,000 in
1996-1998 on mine clearance efforts.
[1] Adevarul (daily newspaper), 10 December
1997. [2] Adevarul (daily newspaper), 2
November 1999. See also, Victor Babiuc, Minister of State, Minister of National
Defense, Letter to Elizabeth Bernstein, ICBL Coordinator, 3 November
1999. [3] “Romania’s
Integration into NATO,” NATO, WEU and Strategic Issues Department,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, November 1999; available at:
http://domino.kappa.ro/dosare.nsf [4]
Letter from the Minister of Defense to Sibienii Pacifisti, No. SG 700, 15 March
2000. [5] Amb. Ion Gorita, Permanent
Mission of Romania to the UN, meeting with Jody Williams and Steve Goose, ICBL,
New York, 6 October 1999. [6]
“Romania’s Integration into NATO,” Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, November 1999. [7] Report of
the Permanent Mission of Romania to the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 28 December 1999, p.
2. [8] “Romania’s
Integration into NATO,” NATO, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, November
1999. [9] Report to the OSCE, 28
December 1999, p. 3. [10] Victor Babiuc,
Minister of State, Minister of National Defense, Letter to Elizabeth Bernstein,
ICBL Coordinator, 3 November 1999. The UN Ambassador cited a date of 1993.
Amb. Ion Gorita, Permanent Mission of Romania to the UN, meeting with ICBL, New
York, 6 October 1999. [11] Landmine
Monitor Report 1999, p. 756. [12] The
Mines Advisory Group has estimated that it could be several million, based on
discussions with Romanian officials. See MAG Stockpile Fact Sheet, September
1998. In addition to AP mines, there are several Romanian produced antivehicle
mines of concern. The MC-71 with a tilt rod fuze is likely prohibited by the MBT
because of its AP mine-like effect. There are several other models that may
also function as AP mines: MAT-46, MAT-62B, MAT-87; P-62.. See, Human Rights
Watch Fact Sheet, “Antivehicle Mines with Antihandling Devices,”
January 2000. [13] Telephone interview
with a Staff Officer, Ministry of Defense, 16 December
1999. [14] As reported in
Austria’s National Report required by Article 13 of Amended Protocol II,
11 October 1999. [15] Amb. Ion Gorita,
Permanent Mission of Romania to the UN, meeting with ICBL, New York, 6 October
1999. [16] Report to the OSCE, Romania,
28 December 1999. [17]
“Anti-personnel landmines on sale at the UK arms fair,” UK Working
Group on Landmines, November 1999, p.
2. [18] John Spellar MP, Minister of
State for the Armed Forces, Written Answer, Hansard, 3 November 1999, cols.
213-214. [19] Radu Tudor, “The
Leadership of Romtechnica Officially Proved Culpable for the Enormous Blunder
Presenting Antipersonnel Mine Lists,” Cotidianul, (daily newspaper), 22
September 1999, p. 3. [20] Personal
communication to the UK Working Group on Landmines, 20 September
1999. [21] The Open Letter was published
in the following newspapers: Dimineata, 21 September 1999; Cotidianul, 22
September 1999; Libertatea, 20 September 1999; Cronica Romana, 22 September
1999; and Ziua, 20 September 1999.