Key
developments since May 2000: India has for the first time designed a
remotely-delivered antipersonnel mine system for trial evaluation and prototype
production. It has also designed for production a detectable version of its
hand-laid, non-metallic M14 mine. According to government sources, 129
civilians were killed and 715 were injured as a result of landmine and IED
incidents in Jammu and Kashmir in 2000.
India has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty,
stating that it has not done so “because our own legitimate security
concerns require us, in view of long land borders, to make use of APLs in a
purely defensive mode.”[1]
In a letter to the ICBL Coordinator in January 2001, the government stated,
“India is fully committed to the eventual elimination of anti-personnel
landmines.... India has called for a ban on the use of APLs in all internal
conflicts.... Our reservations to the [Mine Ban Treaty] pertain primarily to
the absence of any acknowledgement in the Convention of the legitimate security
concerns of some countries, which necessitates the use of APLs. India’s
security environment requires some use of
APLs.”[2]
There has
been little change in India’s landmine policy in recent years. In
December 2000, Ambassador Rakesh Sood summarized India’s policy,
“India remains committed to the objective of a non-discriminatory,
universal and global ban on anti-personnel mines in a manner that addresses the
legitimate defence requirements of States. The process of complete elimination
of anti-personnel landmines will be facilitated by addressing the legitimate
defensive role of anti-personnel landmines for operational requirements under
the defence doctrines of the countries concerned, through the availability of
appropriate militarily-effective, non-lethal and cost-effective alternative
technologies.”[3]
India
abstained from voting on the November 2000 UN General Assembly resolution
calling for universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty, as it
had the three previous years. India did not attend as an observer the Second
Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in September 2000, and did not
participate in the Mine Ban Treaty intersessional Standing Committee meetings in
December 2000 and May 2001.
India is party to the Convention on
Conventional Weapons (CCW) and ratified the Amended Protocol II on 2 September
1999. India participated in the December 2000 second annual meeting of States
Parties to Amended Protocol II, as well as the April 2001 preparatory meeting
for the CCW Review Conference. At that time India agreed to serve as the
“Friend of the Chair” regarding proposals on compliance and
extension of scope. India submitted its annual report required by Article 13 of
Amended Protocol II on 18 October 2000.
Jody Williams (co-recipient of the
1997 Nobel Peace Prize with the ICBL) and ICBL Coordinator Elizabeth Bernstein
visited India at the end of April 2001. They first participated in a
“PeaceJam” event in Dharmsala in northern India with the Dalai Lama,
aimed at educating youth about landmines. Williams and Bernstein then
participated in a national landmine conference in New Delhi organized by the
Indian Campaign to Ban Landmines. Indian officials refused to meet with the
Nobel Laureates from the ICBL. (See below for additional activities by the
Indian Campaign).
Production
India has produced two types of antipersonnel
mines, the M16A1 and the low metal content M14, both copies of US designs.
However, pursuant to its obligations under Amended Protocol II, the government
of India has stated that production of non-detectable mines has ceased and that
no non-detectable mines have been produced since 1 January
1997.[4] Production of mines is
vested solely with government agencies.
India is going to produce new mines
that meet the Amended Protocol II standards, apparently both a detectable
version of the hand emplaced M14 mine and a newly designed remotely delivered
mine with a self-destruct mechanism. India’s October 2000 Article 13
report states, “As regards new production of APLs, a detectable version of
the existing mines is being designed. An RDM (Remotely Delivered Mine) System
for APLs with the requisite SD/SDA [Self-destruction/Self-deactivation]
mechanism has been designed. Prototype production and trial evaluation will
follow.”[5] The likely
production of a remotely delivered mine system is notable in that India has not
previously had RDMs, and in the past suggested banning such
mines.[6]
Production of
Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) by non-state actors in India
continues.
Transfer
India states that it has never exported landmines,
and has had an official, comprehensive export moratorium in place since 3 May
1996. India also states that it has never imported antipersonnel or antivehicle
mines.[7]
It appears that
certain militant groups operating in Kashmir have access to mines manufactured
by Pakistan Ordnance Factory. During interviews in January 2000 with senior
Indian Border Security Force officials and Indian Army officials in Kashmir, the
Landmine Monitor researcher for South Asia was shown, and took photographs of,
recovered antipersonnel and antitank mines that had the seal of the Pakistan
Ordnance Factory on them. It is not known when or how the mines entered the
area.[8] There have also been
allegations that the RDX explosive and trigger mechanisms used in the IEDs
widely employed by the militant groups originate from
Pakistan.[9]
Stockpiling
India will not provide official figures on its
antipersonnel mine stockpile, but knowledgeable Indian and non-Indian sources
have put the figure between four and five
million.[10] The great majority
of stockpiled mines are believed to be the low metal content M14s. India has
stated that its “entire stock of antipersonnel landmines would be rendered
detectable within the stipulated time period” of Amended Protocol II,
which is nine years, by strapping a metal strip onto the
mines.[11]
Use
India used mines in its three wars with Pakistan
in 1947-48, 1965 and 1971, and in its war with China in 1962. India asserts
that the Indian Armed Forces have never used landmines in internal armed
conflicts in India’s Northern and North Eastern
states.[12] In its December
1999 Protocol II report India stated that there “is no peacetime
deployment of landmines by the armed
forces;”[13] minefields
are to be laid only when hostilities are imminent. However, in its October 2000
Protocol II report, India states that mines have been laid for border defense in
areas devoid of civilian population, and that minefields are marked and recorded
in conformity with all the provisions of Amended Protocol
II.[14]
Militants in
Kashmir continue to use large numbers of IEDs, which function as antipersonnel
landmines. The use of antivehicle mines by militants has also been reported,
notably to ambush army and police vehicles. On 21 January 2001 a passenger bus
ran over a landmine, killing three civilians and a soldier and wounding 35
people.[15] In 2000, Indian
authorities report the recovery of 386 landmines (antipersonnel and antitank)
and 718 IEDs in Jammu and
Kashmir.[16]
Landmine Problem
Officials proclaim that “India is not a mine
afflicted country,”[17]
and that agricultural lands and other useful areas were immediately demined on
cessation of previous
hostilities.[18] However, some
mined areas still exist. These are generally in border areas with scant
population, though mine incidents are still reported each year. Minefields are
generally mapped and marked in local languages. No surveys or assessments have
been carried out by any agency, but the situation, at the moment, would not seem
to merit such exhaustive examination.
The most severe humanitarian problem
is found in conflict areas where there is extensive use of IEDs by non-state
actors. In Jammu and Kashmir alone, 1,041 civilians have been killed and a
further 8,736 injured due to explosions caused by mines, improvised explosive
devices, and hand
grenades.[19]
Mine Action Funding
India has neither contributed nor received any
mine action funding. However, it has offered significant assistance
internationally in the form of in-kind services in mine clearance and survivor
assistance programs.
Mine Clearance
In 2000, the Corps of Engineers, which is the
central agency tasked with mine clearance, continued to aid civil authorities in
defusing and clearing improvised explosive devices used by militant groups in
parts of the country.[20] In
the past the Indian Army has been involved in UN-sponsored mine clearance
programs in Congo, Angola, Cambodia, Somalia, Mozambique, Bosnia, Rwanda and
Sierra Leone. During the reporting period of Amended Protocol II –
October 1999 to October 2000 India has participated in UN missions in Lebanon
and Sierra Leone where, though not officially mandated, mine clearance
operations were conducted when mines were
encountered.[21]
India
proposes to set up a “Mine Information Centre” and a website at the
College of Military Engineering in Pune. This will contain data obtained by
Indian personnel in UN mine clearance missions and will focus on technical
aspects of mines encountered, activation mechanisms, methods of laying, marking
and recording mines, and types of mine clearance equipment. The government
intends to make this facility accessible to all countries party to Amended
Protocol II and hopes information flow will be
mutual.[22]
India has also
“developed, productionised and issued” a mechanical minefield
marking system “to many units wherein the marking will be visible,
legible, durable and resistant to environment effects, as far as
possible.”[23]
A June
2001 report alleged that Indian army patrols looking for mines and booby-traps
in Kashmir often force civilians to accompany them, equipping them only with
wooden sticks. An army officer said that no coercion is used and locals provide
knowledge of the topography of the
area.[24]
Mine Awareness
There are no formal mine awareness programs in
India. However, the increased use of IEDs by non-state actors has raised the
need for awareness efforts. Police and Army operating in conflict zones have
been sensitizing the local populace to the dangers of unidentified objects that
could camouflage explosive devices. Electronic and print media have contributed
to public awareness of IEDs through wide coverage of the subject.
The Indian
Campaign to Ban Landmines is continuing its education and awareness campaigns
through seminars and conferences. The campaign has held three National
Conferences and 24 regional Seminars and Photo Exhibition in various state
capitals in India including Jammu & Kashmir and North East
India.[25] The Indian
government acknowledged the relevance and importance of public education in its
December 2000 CCW statement: “Non-governmental organizations, strategic
think-tanks, independent policy groups and research institutions as well as the
electronic and print media have contributed to sensitizing the general public on
the problem of APLs and awareness of international instruments, particularly the
Amended Protocol
II.”[26]
Landmine Casualties
There are regular press reports of landmine
incidents and casualties in Jammu and Kashmir and elsewhere due to insurgent
activities. Reported landmine casualties largely pertain to victims of
improvised explosive devices that are either remotely triggered or function as
mines. According to information provided by government of India sources, in
2000, 129 civilians were killed and 715 were injured as a result of landmine/IED
incidents in Jammu and
Kashmir.[27]
The Indian
Campaign to Ban Landmines carried out field research in border villages of the
Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir in February/March 2000. Researchers identified
more than 200 victims from mines planted in the 1947-48, 1965 and 1971
India-Pakistan wars. Mine casualties are primarily military and police personnel
and civilian farmers and cattle grazers. It was not possible to carry out victim
identification field research in the Kashmir valley due to instability in the
region.
Survivor Assistance
The government of India reports that “As a
consequence of the indiscriminate use of mines during the Kargil conflict, and
also the use of improvised explosive devices and landmines by non-state actors,
a number of casualties (both armed forces personnel and civilians) have
occurred.... Efforts have been made to rehabilitate these personnel through
provision of artificial limbs and subsequent assistance for self-employment in
addition to financial grants. The Army’s Artificial Limb Centre has played
an important role in the field of prosthetics for mine
victims.”[28]
Field
researchers from the Indian Campaign to Ban Landmines found that all survivors
were provided with artificial limbs by the Army or government. However, many
limbs were old and needed replacement so that survivors could perform essential
daily tasks. The widows of landmine victims were initially provided with some
financial assistance by the government but many are in need of additional
support.
Disability Policy and Practice
The “Persons with Disabilities Act
1995” provides relief under the legal system for disabled persons. It
includes “locomotor disability,” the category relevant to landmine
survivors. This Act, however, is not applicable to the state of Jammu and
Kashmir.[29]
[1] Ministry of External
Affairs, Annual Report 1999-2000 (New Delhi: Government of India, 2000)
p. 80.
[2] Letter from Sheel
Kant Sharma, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, No.
AE-I/151/8/2001, to Elizabeth Bernstein, ICBL Coordinator, 17 January
2001.
[3] Ambassador Rakesh
Sood, Statement at the Second Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended
Protocol II of the Convention on Conventional Weapons, Geneva, 11 December
2000.
[4] India, Article 13
report, 18 October 2000, p.
6.
[5] Ibid, p.
7.
[6] Ministry of External
Affairs, Annual Report 1999-2000 (New Delhi: Government of India, 2000)
p. 81
[7] Interview with Mr.
Manpreet Vohra, Deputy Secretary, Disarmament and International Security
Affairs, Ministry of External Affairs, 25 June
2001.
[8] Interviews with
senior Border Security Force officials and Army officials in Kashmir, BSF Camp
and Army Headquarters in Sri Nagar, 6-9 January
2000.
[9] Such allegations
can be found in: Ramesh Vinayak and others, “The RDX Files,”
India Today, 1 February 1999; “Arms dump unearthed in
Kashmir” (PTI), Times of India¸ 13 June 2001; “Huge haul
of grenades, rockets in Kashmir” (PTI), Times of India¸ 31 May
2001; “Pak agencies change strategy for ‘fidayeeen,’”
The Tribune, 19 March 2001; “Seized arms valued at over Rs.95 cr,
The Tribune, 3 December
2000.
[10] This estimate was
first provided to Landmine Monitor by non-Indian government officials involved
in CCW negotiations with Indian officials. Subsequently, current and former
Indian officials have verified the
estimate.
[11] Article 13
report, 1 December 1999.
[12]
Article 13 report, 18 October 2000, p.
5.
[13] Article 13 report, 1
December 1999.
[14] Article
13 report, 18 October 2000, p.
5.
[15] “Fourteen
Killed, Dozens Wounded in Kashmir Violence,” Reuters, Srinigar,
India, 21 January 2001.
[16]
Official Indian Army Website,
http://www.armyinkashmir.org/weapons.html.
[17]
Article 13 report, 1 December
1999.
[18] International
Committee of the Red Cross, “Anti-personnel landmines: Friend or
Foe?” (Geneva: 1996), p.
29.
[19] “Civilian
Casualties in J&K” at http://www.armyinkashmir.org/civilian.htm. The
period covered is 1990 to 31 January
2001.
[20] Article 13 report,
18 October 2000, p. 5.
[21]
Ibid, p. 5. See also Landmine Monitor Report
1999. [22] Ibid, p.
8.
[23] Ibid, p.
7.
[24] “Threats,
Coercion put Kashmir civilians in the firing line,” Agence France
Presse, Poonch, India, 27 June
2001.
[25] Recent initiatives
included workshop in Guwahati, Assam, on 20 September 2000; in Madras, Tamil
Nadu, on 11 November 2000; in Proddatur, Andhra Pradesh, on 26 November 2000
(this was exclusively for police personnel); in the village of Holespet, Andhra
Pradesh, on 3 December 2000; in Kohima, Nagaland, 6 December 2000; in Pune,
Maharashtra, on 30 December 2001, in Ranjit Singh, Pura, on 17 February 2001, in
Village Arnia, on 18 February 2001 and in border villages of Jammu &
Kashmir.
[26] Ambassador
Rakesh Sood, Statement at the Second Annual Conference of States Parties to
Amended Protocol II of the Convention on Conventional Weapons, Geneva, 11
December 2000.
[27] Official
Indian Army website,
http://www.armyinkashmir.org/civilian.html.
[28]
Article 13 report, 18 October 2000, p.
6.
[29] “PWD Act
1995,” at http://www.disabilitynet.org.in/legal/legal1.htm.