+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
 
Table of Contents
Country Reports
Ecuador, Landmine Monitor Report 2003

Ecuador

Key developments since May 2002: According to the OAS, demining activities gained momentum in Ecuador in 2002. In March 2003, the OAS reported that a total of 61,649 square meters of land had been cleared of 4,286 antipersonnel mines. Impact surveys and technical studies were carried out in 2002 and 2003 in a number of provinces. The National Mine Clearance Plan for 2003-2004 was approved on 17 December 2002. Ecuador reported that antipersonnel mines were laid from 1995 to 1998, which indicates that Ecuador used antipersonnel mines after signing the Mine Ban Treaty in December 1997, but prior to entry into force in 1999. Ecuador reported corrections to the number of stockpiled mines destroyed and the number of mines retained.

Mine Ban Policy

Ecuador signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December 1997, ratified on 29 April 1999 and the treaty entered into force for the country on 1 October 1999. Ecuador has not yet enacted national implementation legislation.

Ecuador attended the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in September 2002 and Standing Committee meetings in February and May 2003.

Landmine Monitor received an advance copy of Ecuador’s latest annual Article 7 transparency report dated 30 April 2003, covering the period March 2002 to April 2003. It includes voluntary Form J with information on survivor assistance measures, and an additional Form K, with information on training courses for calendar year 2003. This was Ecuador’s fifth Article 7 report.[1]

On 22 November 2002, Ecuador voted in support of UN General Assembly Resolution 57/74, promoting universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty. During the debate on the resolution, the representative of Ecuador reiterated his country’s full commitment to the objectives of the Mine Ban Treaty.[2]

Ecuador is a State Party to Amended Protocol II (Landmines) of the Convention on Conventional Weapons, but did not attend the Fourth Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended Protocol II in December 2002, and did not submit its annual report under Article 13.

Servicio Paz y Justicia Ecuador (SERPAJ) has been the ICBL representative for Ecuador since May 2001 and has carried out the country report research for Landmine Monitor since 2001.

Production, Transfer and Use

Ecuador reports that it has not produced antipersonnel mines and has no production facilities.[3] According to previous Article 7 reports, in the past Ecuador imported antipersonnel mines from Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Singapore, the former Soviet Union, Spain, and the US.[4]

There are no known reports of mine use in Ecuador in the reporting period, including in regions along the border with Colombia. The Ecuadorian Army recovered a landmine among weapons found abandoned at a Colombian rebel (FARC) camp forty kilometers northeast of Lago Agrio in Ecuadorian territory in November 2002.[5]

Ecuador stated in its 2003 Article 7 report that antipersonnel mines in the country’s mine-affected regions were laid from 1995 to 1998, which indicates that Ecuador used antipersonnel mines after signing the Mine Ban Treaty in December 1997, but prior to ratification and entry into force in 1999.[6]

Stockpiling and Destruction

Ecuador has revised its stockpile destruction information in its 2003 Article 7 report. Previously, Ecuador reported completion of destruction of a stockpile of 260,302 antipersonnel mines by January 2002. Nearly all were destroyed by 11 September 2001, when Ecuador announced completion of destruction, but others (apparently initially to be retained for training) were destroyed in January 2002.[7]

Ecuador now reports that a total of 254,344 mines were destroyed by 11 September 2001, and that on 17 January 2002, an additional 4,500 mines were destroyed, for a total of 258,844 mines.[8] This is 1,458 fewer mines destroyed than previously reported.

In April 2003, Ecuador reported that it is retaining 3,970 antipersonnel mines for training, which is thirty less than reported in May 2002.[9] However, no mines were actually consumed for training or development purposes during the reporting period. Ten of the mines are M18A1 Claymore mines that Ecuador will no longer count as retained because command-detonated Claymores are not “considered within the Convention.” The other 20 mines are VS-50 antipersonnel mines that were transferred to the US Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division in January 2002. This was a correction of the number previously reported as transferred (420 instead of 400).[10]

Landmine Problem and Survey

Previous editions of Landmine Monitor have provided extensive details about the landmine problem in Ecuador. According to the April 2003 Article 7 Report, there are five mine-affected areas from the 1995 “Cenepa” border conflict with Perú: the provinces of Morona Santiago and Zamora Chinchipe in the Cordillera del Cóndor (southeast border region with Perú); Morona Santiago province in Cusumaza-Bombuiza region (central-eastern border with Perú); Tiwintza on the Perúvian side of the border; and El Oro, and Loja provinces in the southern border region. Montalvo, in the east-central border region, and Orellana province, are suspected of being mine-affected.[11] The number of mines laid in the mine-affected areas is unknown, except for El Oro (280 mines) and Loja (120 mines).[12]

According to the Organization of American States (OAS), impact surveys carried out in El Oro and Loja provinces during the first half of 2002 identified 12 mine-affected areas.[13] Two more surveys conducted in Huaquillas at the beginning of 2003 identified a mine-affected area close to populated areas that was subsequently demined.[14] The OAS reports that impact surveys found ten mine-affected areas in Macará department and three mine-affected areas in Zapotillo.[15]

According to the General Command for Mine Clearance, demining units are now conducting technical studies using information provided by the impact surveys. As of March 2003, four technical studies had been conducted in 13 mine-affected areas of Loja province, but no minefields were found, and technical studies carried out in seven of the 14 mine-affected areas in El Oro also found no minefields, but “isolated” individual mines.

Mine Action Funding

In May 2003, the OAS presented a projection of financial resources and requirements for the period 2003-2007. For Ecuador, the total was $4.4 million: $600,000 for 2003, $800,000 for 2004, $1 million for 2005, $1 million for 2006, and $1 million for 2007, which is when OAS funding for Ecuador is scheduled to end.[16] According to United Nations country reports, the OAS budget for calendar year 2003 for mine clearance in Ecuador is $1,205,452. The 2002 OAS budget for victim rehabilitation was $75,000.[17]

According to a May 2003 presentation by the OAS, sixteen governments and the European Union have contributed to the OAS regional mine action program to date.[18] In its fiscal year 2002, the United States contributed more than $1 million to Ecuador to fund humanitarian demining activities.[19]

Mine Action Coordination and Planning

The Ecuadorian Mine Clearance Center (CENDESMI, Centro de Desminado del Ecuador) and the General Command for Mine Clearance are responsible for mine action in the country, and for coordination with the OAS Mine Action Program (AICMA).[20] CENDESMI’s headquarters are located near Quito and the center has regional command centers in El Oro province (“Tarqui”) and Morona Santiago province (“Amazonas”).[21]

The Information Management System for Mine Action (IMSMA) was installed at the OAS AICMA office in January 2002 to assist CENDESMI in the planning, coordination and direction of a national humanitarian demining plan.[22] IMSMA is the main source of information for CENDESMI, the General Command, and other organizations involved in mine action.[23]

The National Mine Clearance Plan for 2003-2004 was approved on 17 December 2002. The plan projects that clearance and quality control would be completed in two provinces, La Loja and El Oro, that are densely populated and have agricultural lands.[24]

In May 2003, the Inter-American Defense Board (IADB) established a permanent team of international monitors to support mine clearance in Ecuador and Perú.[25]

Mine Clearance

Engineer units of the Ecuadorian Army conduct mine clearance in the country. The 40-deminer Amazonas Regional Demining Unit is based at Santiago in Morona Santiago province along the eastern border with Perú.[26] In 2001, it carried out mine clearance operations along two fronts: from border marker Shirumsa Chiqueiza to border marker Tambillo, and from Soldado Monge to the border marker at Tambillo.[27] The Tarqui Regional Unit, based at Santa Rosa in El Oro province, operates in Arellinas and Huaquillas departments along the border with Perú.[28] In 2001, it conducted mine clearance operations in Quebrada Seca, El Progreso, Roncano departments and the Zarumilla River in El Oro province.[29]

According to the OAS, demining activities gained momentum in Ecuador and Perú in the course of 2002.[30] In March 2003, the OAS reported that a total of 61,649 square meters of land had been cleared of 4,286 antipersonnel mines to date (cumulative, not just 2002), as well as 59 antivehicle mines and two pieces of unexploded ordnance.[31] In April 2003, Ecuador reported that a total of 4,573 mines had been cleared to date (again cumulative): 4,355 mines from Santiago, 30 mines from Tiwintza, 186 mines from El Oro, and two from Loja.[32] In mid-May 2003, Ecuador reported that clearance operations in El Oro would be completed by the end of the month.[33] In June 2003, the Armed Forces reported that mine clearance was underway in Macará.[34]

Ecuadorian and Peruvian Army clearance personnel held a number of meetings in 2002 and 2003 to coordinate clearance activities along their common border.[35] The first meeting was held on 13 July 2002 in Aguas Verdes, in Tumbes department, Perú with the support of the OAS.[36] On 22 August 2002, Ecuador and Perú signed a Memorandum of Understanding on mutual procedures for evacuation situations, and communications systems for carrying out coordinated actions.[37] On 7 February 2003 in Zarumilla, Tumbes department, Perú, mine clearance goals were discussed, especially the need for joint mine clearance efforts at the source of the Zarumilla River.[38]

A basic demining course and an IMSMA training course were held during the first quarter of 2002, and in addition the US Army conducted a humanitarian demining course in 2002.[39] More training courses were planned for 2003.[40] In February 2003, Ecuador reported that discussions had been held with OAS AICMA and the IADB on training by international supervisors on International Mine Action Standards, as well as quality control.[41] On 12 May 2003, four international monitors from MARMINCA (Honduran and Nicaraguan personnel) were sent to Ecuador and Perú to provide training and quality control.[42]

CENDESMI reports that the first phase of training of mine detection dogs is being carried out as of April 2003, using its own resources. CENDESMI is also providing support to Chilean Army demining personnel. As of mid-2003, six officers and three volunteers were trained at CENDESMI.[43]

Ecuador sent representatives to a regional mine action conference (“Advances in Mine Clearance in the Americas”) held on 27-28 August 2002 in Managua, Nicaragua. In January 2003, Ecuadorian representatives attended a regional IMSMA seminar in Antigua, Guatemala.[44]

Mine Risk Education

Mine risk education (MRE) activities are carried out by the Army, the OAS, and the Ecuadorian Red Cross.[45] The Psychological Operations Unit of the US Army Southern Command has also assisted.[46]

Mine risk education has been conducted in the provinces of La Loja (for approximately 2,100 people in Macará, Bocana, El Limón, Badea and Guatara in Macará department, and Cazaderos, Zapotilla and Tronco Quemado in Zapotillo department) and El Oro (for approximately some 3,000 people in Huaquillas, Carcabón, Chacras, Balsalito, San Pedro, Quebrada Seca, and El Progreso Palmales).[47] MRE activities include meetings with the local population, distribution of folders, brochures, and posters, and MRE messages broadcast on local television. There is also a no-cost phone number set up that provides information on mines and mine risk prevention. In January 2003, the Geneva International Center for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) was asked to provide an expert to evaluate these MRE efforts.[48] According to the Director of CENDESMI, MRE campaigns target the local population, including peasants and youth.[49]

Landmine Casualties

There is no systematic data-gathering mechanism for landmine incidents in Ecuador and exact figures are unavailable. On 10 January 2002, a 19-year-old Peruvian died after stepping on a landmine when returning home from Ecuador; Ecuadorian officials claim the mine was in Peruvian territory.[50] Landmine Monitor has no information on further casualties in 2002 or the first half of 2003.

An impact survey carried out in La Loja province in November 2001 identified seven mine casualties resulting from five incidents.[51] One person was killed, two lost a lower limb, two had multiple injuries, and two were not physically harmed.[52]

According to the US State Department, there were approximately 120 landmine casualties in Ecuador between 1995 and 1999, the majority of them civilians.[53]

There have been no recorded mine casualties among deminers since mine clearance operations began in Ecuador.

Survivor Assistance and Disability Policy and Practice

The military in Ecuador has a health care system that provides integrated care to military landmine casualties through the Armed Forces Social Security Institute (ISSFA, Instituto de Seguridad Social de las Fuerzas Armadas). Civilians injured by landmines do not receive the same level of attention as military personnel and existing services remain inadequate. Mine clearance operations have trained personnel and helicopters for evacuation available at all times.[54]

In March 2002, Landmine Monitor visited mine-affected zones in the southern border, as well as the public hospital in Huaquillas and the military hospital in Pasaje. Hospital records in Huaquillas indicated that five mine casualties were treated there during the Cenepa conflict. The military hospital in Pasaje has an Orthopedic Center.[55]

The OAS AICMA Ecuador program maintains a registry of landmine casualties. Two mine survivors have received new prostheses and a third required reconstructive surgery to a foot. The OAS program provides transport from the communities to a rehabilitation center, lodging, medical care, prostheses, physical therapy, and medicines.[56] The budget for MRE and rehabilitation was $75,000 for four six-month modules in 2002.[57]

In 2002, five disabled veterans from the Association of Disabled Veterans “Upper Cenepa” received training on the IMSMA system and continue to work at CENDESMI headquarters and at the regional demining units.[58]

In 2003, the OAS program, in cooperation with the Ministry of Defense, provided funding for a landmine survivor to begin the three-year training program in prosthetics and orthotics at the University Don Bosco in El Salvador.[59]

Ecuador has legislation to protect the rights of victims of the conflict.[60]


[1] See Article 7 Report, 31 May 2002 (for the period March 2001-April 2002); Article 7 Report, 5 March 2001 (for the period July 2000-March 2001); Article 7 Report, 23 August 2000 (for the period March-July 2000); Article 7 Report, 29 March 2000 (for the period April 1999-March 2000).
[2] Statement by Permanent Alternate Representative Dr. Fernando Yépez Lasso, 57th UN General Assembly First Committee General Debate, New York, 2 October 2002.
[3] Article 7 Report, Form E and H, 30 April 2003.
[4] See Article 7 Report, Form B, 29 March 2000 and 5 March 2001.
[5] Dimitri Barreto P., "El Ejército destruyó una base y escuela insurgentes," El Comercio (Quito), 6 November 2002.
[6] Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2003.
[7] Article 7 Report, Form G, 31 May 2002. See also, Landmine Monitor Report 2002, pp. 235-236.
[8] Article 7 Report, Form G, 30 April 2003.
[9] Article 7 Report, Forms B and D, 30 April 2003; Article 7 Report, Forms B and D, 31 May 2002.
[10] Article 7 Report, Form B (Observación) and Form D, 30 April 2003; Article 7 Report, Form D, 31 May 2002.
[11] Article 7 Report, Form C, 30 April 2003.
[12] Ibid.
[13] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Estudios de Impacto,” last updated 10 March 2003, at www.aicma-ec.org (accessed 27 May 2003); OAS Update on Regional Mine Action Efforts, May 2003, p. 3.
[14] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Estudios de Impacto.”
[15] Ibid.; OAS, “Landmine Removal in Ecuador,” Project document located on UN Mine Action “Emine” website, Ecuador, last updated 30 November 2002, at www.mineaction.org (accessed 29 May 2003).
[16] See OAS, “Mine Action Program: Making the Western Hemisphere landmine-safe,” Resource Mobilization: Projection of Financial Resources/Requirements 2003-2007, p. 6. Presented at the Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, 12 May 2003.
[17] OAS, “Landmine Removal in Ecuador,” Project document located on UN Mine Action “Emine” website.
[18] The donors include Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, UK, and USA. OAS, “Mine Action Program: Making the Western Hemisphere landmine-safe,” Resource Mobilization: Projection of Financial Resources/Requirements 2003-2007, p. 5. Presented at the Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, 12 May 2003. Also notes taken by Landmine Monitor (MAC) at the OAS presentation to the Standing Committee on General Status and Operation of the Convention, 12 May 2003.
[19] US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety,” September 2002. This includes $370 million from the State Department and an estimated $700,000 from the Defense Department.
[20] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Antecedentes.”
[21] Article 7 Report, Form A, 30 April 2003.
[22] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Antecedentes.”
[23] Statement by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, 5 February 2003.
[24] Statement by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 5 February 2003.
[25] OAS Update on Regional Mine Action Efforts, May 2003.
[26] OAS, “Landmine Removal in Ecuador,” Project document located on UN Mine Action “Emine” website.
[27] Ibid.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Ibid.
[30] OAS Update on Regional Mine Action Efforts, May 2003, p. 2.
[31] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Despeje de Campos Minados.”
[32] Article 7 Report, Form G, 30 April 2003.
[33] Intervention by Ecuador, the Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, MRE and Mine Action Technologies, 14 May 2003 (Notes taken by Landmine Monitor).
[34] Publication by the Engineer Division of the Armed Forces, 27 June 2003.
[35] OAS Update on Regional Mine Action Efforts, May 2003, p. 3.
[36] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Reuniones entres las unidades de desminado de Ecuador and Perú.”
[37] Statement by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 5 February 2003; OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Reuniones entres las unidades de desminado de Ecuador and Perú.” The agreement had eight points, including information exchange on mine presence, development of joint mine clearance operations, and coordinated mine risk education campaigns.
[38] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Reuniones entres las unidades de desminado de Ecuador and Perú.”
[39] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 238.
[40] Article 7 Report, Form K, 30 April 2003.
[41] Statement by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 5 February 2003.
[42] Intervention by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 15 May 2003 (Notes taken by Landmine Monitor).
[43] Interview with Lt. Col. Roberto Arauz, CENDESMI, 1 April 2003.
[44] Statement “El Llamado de Managua,” 28 August 2002.
[45] Intervention by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, 15 May 2003 (Notes taken by Landmine Monitor).
[46] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Educación Preventiva.”
[47] See Article 7 Report, Form I, 30 April 2003; statement by Ecuador, Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 5 February 2003; OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “AICMA-EC,” see “Educación Preventiva.”
[48] Article 7 Report, Form I, 30 April 2003.
[49] Interview with Lt. Col. Roberto Arauz, CENDESMI, 1 April 2003.
[50] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, pp. 239-240.
[51] OAS AICMA Ecuador web page, “Asistencia a Víctimas,” “Estudios de Impacto.”
[52] Ibid.
[53] US Department of State, “To Walk the Earth in Safety,” September 2002, p. 47.
[54] For more details see Landmine Monitor Report 2001, pp. 333-334.
[55] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 240.
[56] OAS AICMA Ecuador webpage, “Asistencia a Víctimas;” Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2003.
[57] OAS/Mine Victim Rehabilitation Program (as part of the OAS/ Comprehensive Action Against Antipersonnel Mines) Ecuador 2002, available at www.mineaction.org (accessed 29 May 2003).
[58] Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2003.
[59] OAS AICMA Ecuador webpage, “Asistencia a Víctimas;” Article 7 Report, Form J, 30 April 2003.
[60] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 240.