Key developments since May 2002:
Destruction of Portugal’s stockpile of 231,781 antipersonnel mines was
completed in February 2003, in advance of its August 2003 deadline.
Mine Ban Policy
Portugal signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December
1997, ratified on 19 February 1999, and became a State Party on 1 August 1999.
It decided in February 2002 that the requirements of Article 9 of the treaty for
national implementation measures, including penal sanctions to enforce the
treaty, are already met by existing
legislation.[1]
Portugal participated in the Fourth Meeting of States Parties in September
2002 and the intersessional Standing Committee meetings in February and May
2003. At the meeting on 6 February 2003, its representatives made a
comprehensive presentation of Portugal’s implementation of the treaty,
including promotion of the treaty, legislation, stockpile destruction, mine
action and victim assistance. Portugal reported that it has promoted the treaty
to Portuguese-speaking African countries. Portugal also announced it would
create a permanent Defense Commission, which was awaiting ministerial decision,
to implement the work that results from all the provisions of the
Convention.[2] An official
further explained, “This is a proposal presented to the Minister of
Defense at the beginning of the year to operationalize all the different aspects
of the Convention,” with a likely focus on cooperation with countries such
as Angola, Mozambique, or
Guinea-Bissau.[3]
The UN did not record submission of the annual transparency report required
by Article 7 by the deadline of 30 April 2003. At the Standing Committee
meetings in May 2003 the Portuguese delegation informed Landmine Monitor that
the report for 2002 had been submitted to the UN. The report had not appeared
on the UN website by mid-July 2003. Portugal submitted three previous Article 7
reports.[4]
In November 2002, Portugal voted in favor of UN General Assembly Resolution
57/74, which calls for universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty.
Portugal is a State Party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its
Amended Protocol II. It submitted a report as required by Article 13 of the
Protocol on 28 November 2002. This notes that “Because Portugal is not a
mine-affected State, there is no legislation related to the
Protocol.”[5] Portugal
did not attend the Fourth Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended
Protocol II in December 2002.
In October 2002 ALEM-SOLVIG, the national campaign on landmines and other
remnants of war, released a report in Portuguese containing the Landmine Monitor
country reports for eight Portuguese-speaking
countries.[6]
Joint Operations and Transit
Portugal confirmed at the Standing Committee meetings in February 2003 that
it does “not assist, encourage or induce, in any way, anyone to engage in
any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention” and that
Portugal “would not give the authorization to mine
transfers.”[7] A
Portuguese representative at the Standing Committee meetings in February 2003
added, “In 1999 or 2000, in relation to a joint exercise in which
participated American forces, Portugal raised that objection. This was public
and notorious. In relation to the Claymore [mines], which are not even part of
the treaty, and as you know, can be turned into antipersonnel mines, Portugal
clearly said to the Americans it would not accept to participate in an exercise
with Claymore mines.”[8]
Transit of weaponry possibly including antipersonnel mines through the US
base at Lajes on Terceira, in the Azores islands, in the build up to the Iraq
war, was the subject of media reports and public protests in January and
February 2003. An official told Landmine Monitor, “We assume the
commitment to avoid transfers. Taking into account our sovereignty and the
[Lajes] agreement, we believe that the Americans comply with what we
stipulated.”[9] There is
no formal inspection regime of the weaponry transited, nor any specific mention
of landmines in the Lajes agreement, except the obligation for the US to request
authorization by submitting a weaponry list.
Claymore Mines and Antivehicle Mines with Sensitive Fuzes
In February 2003, a Portuguese official told Landmine Monitor,
“Portugal does not have Claymore mines any more. Portugal considers that
Claymore mines should be part of the treaty, as many other countries do.... It
is not understandable why the Claymore, being so easily transformed into
antipersonnel mines, is not part of the treaty. There should a call [for
attention] on that and probably during the Convention’s revision
process.”[10]
Regarding Portugal’s position on antivehicle mines with sensitive fuzes
and antihandling devices, an official said, “We are completely interested
in banning this type of mine, or any such thing that leads to the same
situation, such as Claymores and things like that, that function in a
indiscriminate
way.”[11]
Production and Transfer
Portugal stopped production of antipersonnel mines
in 1988 and has prohibited export since
1996.[12] The magazine
Visão reported that Portugal exported mines to Iraq in
1993.[13]
At least eight types of antipersonnel mines were previously produced.
Portuguese mines have been found in 10
countries.[14] The Portuguese
M969 antipersonnel mine is one of the most frequently encountered mines in
Guinea-Bissau. Another Portuguese mine reported in Guinea-Bissau is the M59, a
previously unknown type to Landmine
Monitor.[15]
Stockpile Destruction
Portugal completed its stockpile destruction
program on 21 February 2003, with the destruction of 231,781 antipersonnel
mines.[16] On 25 June 2003, the
Minister of Defense toured the destruction facility and symbolically destroyed
the last antipersonnel mine.[17]
Portugal’s treaty-mandated deadline for stockpile destruction was 1 August
2003.
The September 2002 Article 7 report provided revised stockpile data, with
reduced quantities and general categories of mines rather than the type
designation given in earlier information. This included: antipersonnel blast
mine, 190,517; antipersonnel fragmentation mine, 38,189; inert antipersonnel
mine, 2,501; antipersonnel mine, 574; totaling
231,781.[18] This was a
reduction of 40,629 mines from the original total of 272,410 stated in
Portugal’s two previous Article 7
reports.[19] The revised data
was also presented at the Standing Committee meetings in February 2003, with
details of the destruction processes and a timeline showing the progress of the
destruction program which started in February
2002.[20]
Mines retained under Article 3
The number of antipersonnel mines retained for permitted purposes under
Article 3 of the treaty totals 1,115 mines (instead of the 3,523 originally
declared). The types of mines are not
reported.[21] They are retained
“for instruction purposes in the following areas: detection, demining and
destruction.”[22]
Mine Action Assistance
Portugal’s December 2002 Article 13 Report
states that because “Portugal is not a mine affected State...co-operation
does not include mine clearance
issues.”[23]
At the Standing Committee meetings in February 2003, Portugal reported that
the Army had participated in international missions with a clearance component
in Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Timor Leste, and has previously assisted
demining in Angola.[24] In May
2003, the Portuguese delegation announced that discussions for future
cooperation on mine action had been started with Angola and
Guinea-Bissau.[25]
Guinea-Bissau’s Secretary of State, Nhassé Na Mã, said he
“regretted the lack of Portuguese help and the failure to keep a promise
to send 50 deminers to train Guineans, which was finally done free of charge by
Mozambicans.”[26]
The System and Robotics Institute is working on mine detecting and robot
guiding algorithms (multiple sensor data fusing, a friendly robot-guiding system
for uneven terrain and obstacles). The research team is also writing a book on
“Robots for Humanitarian
Demining.”[27]
Survivor Assistance
In March 2003, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
stated, “Portugal continues to assist Angola through a physiotherapeutic
support program for war-affected children (since 1999), which involves
Coimbra’s Military Hospital. The project cost €10,000 [US$9,500]
for the year
2002.”[28]
According to the doctor responsible for the physiotherapy department,
“A new group of children is awaited, which will eventually arrive after
our visit [to Angola] in July 2003. Four children remain in Coimbra, in the
communidade São Francisco. One of them, a boy, underwent surgery on his
stump which had grown. All of them received new physiotherapy treatment and
prostheses since they are all growing up. Two of them are studying and two
others are receiving professional
training.”[29]
[1] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p.
415. [2] Vilar de Jesus, Defense Policy
Directorate, Ministry of Defense, and Fernando de Brito, First Secretary,
Permanent Mission to the UN in Geneva, ”Ottawa Convention Process
Implementation,” Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 6
February 2003. [3] Interview with Vilar
de Jesus, Ministry of Defense, Geneva, 7 February
2003. [4] Article 7 Report, 9 September
2002 (for the calendar year 2001); Article 7 Report, 30 April 2001 (for the
period 3 December 1997–31 January 2001); Article 7 Report, 1 February 2000
(for the period 3 December 1999–31 January 2000).
[5] CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13
Report, Form D, 11 December 2002. [6]
“Relatório Lusófono do Monitor de Minas 2002 – Rumo a
um Mundo livre de Minas,” legal deposit number 186936/02, Lisbon, October
2002. [7] Intervention by Portugal,
Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, 6 February
2003. [8] Interview with Vilar de Jesus,
Ministry of Defense, Permanent Mission to the UN, Geneva, 7 February
2003. [9] Interview with Fernando de
Brito, Permanent Mission to the UN, Geneva, 7 February
2003. [10] Interview with Vilar de
Jesus, Ministry of Defense, Geneva, 7 February
2003. [11] Interview Fernando de Brito,
Permanent Mission to the UN, Geneva, 7 February
2003. [12] See Landmine Monitor Report
2000, p. 708. [13] Ana Tomás
Ribeiro and Filipe Fialho, “Amizades Luso-Iraquianas”
(“Luso-Iraqi Friendships”), Visão (weekly magazine), 27
February to 5 March 2003. The article was based on a National Statistics
Institute and ICEP (Investment, Commerce and Tourism of Portugal) document
mentioning an official transaction of “Bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines,
missiles, cartridges and other projectiles munitions and its components”
for a total of 10,041,000 Portuguese escudos.
[14] See Landmine Monitor Report 2000,
p. 708. Portuguese mines have been found in Angola, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq,
Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Somalia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
[15] Guinea-Bissau, Article 7 Report,
Form H, 19 June 2002. [16] Letter from
the Permanent Mission of Portugal to the UN in New York, ONU/2003/67, 9 May
2003. [17] “Paulo Portas destruiu
última mina anti-pessoal,” LUSA, 25 June
2003. [18] Article 7 Report, Form B, 9
September 2002. [19] The discrepancy
is explained as resulting from “a more specific, methodical and accurate
mine counting.” Article 7 Report, Form J, 9 September
2002. [20] Intervention by Portugal,
Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, 6 February
2003. [21] Ibid; Article 7 Report, Form
D, 9 September 2002. [22] Letter from
Manuel Carvalho, Director, Defense and Security Service Directorate, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, in response to Landmine Monitor Questionnaire, 3 March
2003. [23] CCW Amended Protocol II
Article 13 Report, Form B, 11 December
2002. [24] Intervention by Portugal,
Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, 6 February
2003. [25] Intervention by Portugal,
Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction, Geneva, 15 May 2003 (Landmine
Monitor notes). [26]
“Destruição de 7 milhões de minas em Angola
levará muito tempo,” no. 4138297, LUSA (media agency), Geneva, 23
September 2002. [27] Email from Lino
Marques, DEMINE research program director, System and Robotics Institute, 12
November 2002. [28] Letter from Manuel
Carvalho, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3 March 2003.
[29] Telephone interview with Dr.
Fontes, Physiotherapeutic Department, Coimbra Military Hospital, Coimbra, 25
March 2003.