Founded in May 1999 and co-chaired by Landmine Survivors Network (since 1998)
and Ugandan landmine survivor Margaret Orech Arach (since 2003), the ICBL
Working Group on Victim Assistance (WGVA) counts approximately 98 organizations
in its membership.[4] The WGVA
has four inter-related objectives: 1) to advocate for, monitor, and provide
guidance to the international community as to where, what, and how victim
assistance is needed; 2) to promote increased coverage, funding, and
sustainability of victim assistance programs; 3) to promote improvements in the
quality of programs for landmine victims and other persons with disability; and
4) to facilitate inclusion of landmine victims in the substantive work of the
Standing Committees, annual meetings of States Parties, as well as country
campaigns and the ICBL.
The WGVA works to ensure implementation of Article 6.3 of the Mine Ban Treaty
which calls on States Parties to “provide assistance for the care and
rehabilitation and social and economic reintegration of mine victims...”
Intersessional Standing Committee
In 2003/2004, the WGVA continued to advocate for increased and improved
assistance for landmine victims/survivors during its participation in the
Standing Committee on Victim Assistance, meetings of States Parties, and other
meetings, as well as through the Raising the Voices program. It continued to
work with the co-chairs of the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance,
Australia and Croatia, as well as co-rapporteurs, Nicaragua and Norway. WGVA
members reviewed and contributed to official victim assistance documents drafted
by the Standing Committee and for preparatyion of the Nairobi Review Conference.
The WGVA continued to promote focused work within the Standing Committee,
reminding the Committee of the priorities which emerged from a UNMAS-supported
consultative process,[5] and
more recently by encouraging greater interest in a short list of countries whose
VA needs are the most
profound.[6] The WGVA notes
that States Parties interventions during the Standing Committee have become much
more targeted, nuanced, and sophisticated than before. Various WGVA members
organized panels, workshops, studies, and interventions from the floor to
apprise the Standing Committee of trends and issues that are important to the
field of landmine victim assistance.
Raising the Voices
More than 60 mine survivors have participated in the Raising the Voices
program, established in 2000, implemented by LSN for the WGVA and supported by
the governments of Canada and Norway. Raising the Voices is a leadership and
advocacy training program for mine survivors, which will be ending in its
present form after 2004.
In 2004, twenty-two survivors from 13 countries or regions in Europe and the
Middle East (Abkhazia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chechnya,
Croatia, Georgia, Jordan, Lebanon, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen)
participated in the program, while, in 2003, sixteen landmine survivors from
seven countries in Asia (Afghanistan, Cambodia, India, Laos, Nepal, Sri Lanka
and Thailand) participated. In addition to telling their personal stories,
landmine survivors are now consulted for substantive input into the work of the
ICBL and the SC-VA. The WGVA has advocated with States Parties for the
“institutionalization” of participation of landmine survivors in the
intersessional meetings and annual MSPs of the Mine Ban Treaty in the
post-Nairobi period.
In each meeting of the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance, Raising the
Voices group has made interventions on a range of topics:
Latin America (2001)[7]Rehabilitation is a precondition to every other step required for a disabled
person to become fully integrated into society. Access to rehabilitation
services is inadequate or unavailable in our region. In addition, access to
public places is fundamentally necessary and directly connected to our rights to
earn a living to get education to get health care and to participate in society.
To ensure equal participation in society we need a means of achieving economic
empowerment. We need laws and policies that can provide a framework for our
participation and allow us to progress in our societies.
Africa (2002)[8] Our
goal is not to solve all the problems faced by persons with disabilities,
but rather to empower them to improve the quality of their own lives. One way
to improve landmine survivors’ lives is to ensure their access to basic
education as this is very limited for most survivors, especially women. Basic
education and literacy should be considered a form of victim assistance.
Empowerment is the power to choose one’s path in life whether it be the
path of a tailor or the path of a lawyer and basic literacy training opens doors
to any of these paths. In the Mine Ban Treaty, care, rehabilitation, social
integration, and economic integration are all mentioned, as they should be, but
we recommend an emphasis on the fact that care, rehabilitation, and social
integration should lead to economic integration. It is really true that
people prefer not to beg – they would rather work.
Asia (2003)[9] We
encourage governments to promote persons with disabilities participation in the
workforce through support including vocational training, quota schemes,
technical or financial assistance to companies employing persons with
disabilities, and grants or interest-free loans to help start projects or small
businesses. To ensure success, persons with disabilities should receive
technical assistance, and where possible financial assistance, at all stages
from development to training to implementation and ongoing evaluation. We
encourage governments to promote and assist persons with disabilities to
establish and strengthen self-help groups so they can play a role in developing
law and policy on disability issues. Governments should adopt a consistent
approach to disability and ensure that landmine survivors benefit from the
relevant programs.
East Europe (2004)[10]In order to live as equal and independent citizens, we require access. Rule
Five of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with
Disabilities lists five specific areas of society for which accessibility is
key: infrastructures, transportation, buildings, communication systems, and
assistive devices. On economic reintegration, we recommend that 1) laws not
discriminate against landmine survivors, 2) employers of landmine survivors
receive tax reduction, 3) the promotion of professional, including
re-qualification, training, 4) self-employment, especially small businesses and
home based businesses, 5) favorable loan conditions for self-employment of mine
survivors, 6) prioritization in tendering and contracting to companies that
employ mine survivors, 7) flexible hours for mine survivors, 8) equal and
adequate pay for mine survivors, 9) employment of mine survivors in the public
sector, 10) establishment of a fund for pilot programs that is financed by the
taxation of luxury goods.
The Middle East (2004)[11]In the daily life of persons with disabilities access is important whether
in collecting water, going to school, trying to get to work, applying for a job,
or participating in international events such as the Nairobi Summit. Ensuring
access requires that effective measures be undertaken immediately including the
legal and policy change. We would like to emphasize four of the many components
of social and economic reintegration: the right to work, policy-making and
planning, formation of associations for landmine survivors, and technical and
economic cooperation.
Advocacy & Research
The WGVA continued to promote improvements in program quality, coverage,
funding and sustainability of victim assistance programs and to apprise the
SC-VA of trends and issues that are important to the field of landmine victim
assistance.
In May 2004, WGVA member Handicap International organized a workshop in Paris
on lessons learned in victim assistance, attended by field NGOs from around the
world. Workshop participants recommended that donors concentrate their funding
on: economic integration activities, expanding access to and building
sustainability for physical rehabilitation, long-term training for technical
experts (in medical care and amputation surgery) and in management skills, and
building the capacity of local counterparts in national planning.
In June 2004, representatives from over 25 organizations involved in the
implementation of prosthetics and orthotics participated in a workshop convened
by LSN in Geneva to discuss elements for a common approach in implementing
prosthetics and orthotics in low-income countries. It is hoped that this
document will become the foundation for a set of clear, concise guidelines for
this sub-sector of rehabilitation, which is of key importance to landmine
survivors.
In 2004, LSN initiated a study into national legal frameworks relating to
people with disabilities in mine-affected States Parties. In a presentation
provided to the June 04 Standing Committee, LSN identified three ways in which
disability rights are is addressed within national
constitutions.[12]
Between 2000 and 2002, Handicap International (HI) published three world
reports on mine victim assistance and in 2001 it organized a Southeast Asia
regional process on victim assistance drawn from national workshops held in
Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. HI also published a document on the
issue of reparation for landmine victims called, “Towards the Rights of
Landmine Victims.”
In 2003, the Landmine Monitor Victim Assistance Research Coordinator
published a study analyzing victim assistance funding and another detailing
victim assistance in South East Europe.
On behalf of the WGVA, LSN conducted a review for the Standing Committee to
monitor progress in victim assistance since the establishment of the Mine Ban
Treaty using a set of six
indicators[13] originally
developed for a Canadian government study in 1999/2000. The study was presented
at the Fifth Meeting of States Parties.
In 2003, the World Rehabilitation Fund developed a set of guidelines for the
socio-economic reintegration of mine survivors to be used as a checklist,
against which policy and program developments can be compared.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
LSN presented an update on the new convention process at the UNMAS/UNMAC
Directors’ meeting in March 2004 and LSN and UNMAS co-sponsored a briefing
on the right to rehabilitation in the proposed Disability Rights Convention
during the Third Ad Hoc Meeting at the UN in New York in June 2004. In May
2003, LSN organized a panel of experts to speak about victim assistance and the
proposed convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.
[4] Among the most active are: Austria,
Australia, Cambodia, Colombia, Nepal, and Thailand, and organizations such as
the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, Handicap International, LSN, and
POWER. [5] Priorities for victim
assistance according to the consultative process: emergency and medical care,
rehabilitation, prosthetics and assistive devices, employment and economic
reintegration, legislation and national
planning. [6] States Parties which
have hundreds or thousands of landmine survivors: Albania, Afghanistan, Angola,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, Croatia, the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, El Salvador, Eritrea, Guinea Bissau,
Mozambique, Nicaragua, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Sudan, Tajikistan,
Thailand, Uganda and Yemen. [7]
Participants from Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, and
Nicaragua. [8] Participants from
Angola, Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa,
Sudan, and Uganda. [9] Participants
from Afghanistan, Cambodia, India, Laos, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and
Thailand. [10] Participants from
Abkhazia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chechnya, Croatia, Georgia,
Russia, and Ukraine. [11] Participants
from Jordan, Lebanon, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen.
[12] These being a) in
anti-discrimination provisions, either pertaining specifically to disability, or
general provisions on non-discrimination, b) in provisions that reference and
incorporate international or regional human rights law into national law, and c)
in provisions focused on protection and assistance, for example, financial
assistance, assistance in the provision of rehabilitation services, or special
care. [13] The six indicators are:
the extent to which...1) information on mine victims demographics and needs is
available, 2) a national disability coordination mechanism exists and recognizes
mine victims, 3) medical care and rehabilitation services exist, 4) social and
economic reintegration services exist, 5) laws and policies exist that protect
and ensure the rights of landmine survivors and other people with disabilities,
6) organizations of people with disabilities (community advocacy network)
exist.