Key developments since May 2003:In 2003, Spain provided mine
action funding and assistance of about $1.2 million. Spanish demining and
explosive ordnance disposal personnel participated in peacekeeping operations in
Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq and Kosovo. The International
Demining Training Center provided training courses on humanitarian demining for
71 personnel from Afghanistan, Angola, Mozambique and Colombia.
Key developments since 1999:Spain became a State Party to the
Mine Ban Treaty on 1 July 1999. Legislation prohibiting antipersonnel mines was
passed earlier in October 1998. Spain’s completed destruction of its
stockpile of some 850,000 antipersonnel mines on 3 October 2000. Spain
initially intended to retain 10,000 mines, but announced in May 2000 that this
would be reduced to 4,000. In February 2000, the Ministry of Defense said that
US antipersonnel mines stockpiled in Rota had been withdrawn. From 1999 to
2003, Spain contributed approximately $4.7 million to mine action. In September
2001, the International Demining Training Center was established, and it has
expanded its activities since then.
Mine Ban Policy
Spain signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 19
January 1999, becoming a State Party on 1 July 1999. In the preceding years,
Spain attended all the preparatory meetings of the Ottawa Process, but was not
considered a strong supporter of the mine
ban.[1]
Legislation prohibiting antipersonnel mines was passed in October 1998. This
included an annex stating that the penal sanctions required by Article 9 of the
treaty would be developed in new implementing
legislation.[2] In 2001, Spain
took the view that penal sanctions were already present in existing
legislation.[3]
Spain’s annual Article 7 report was submitted to the UN on 30 April
2004. Four previous Article 7 reports have been
submitted.[4] The reports for
2003, 2002 and 2001 include the voluntary Form J to report mine action funding
and assistance.
Spain has attended all of the annual Meetings of States Parties and has
participated regularly, if not in a high profile manner, in the intersessional
work program. At the February 2004 intersessional Standing Committee meetings,
Spain cited the completion of its stockpile destruction program and its mine
action assistance as indications of Spain’s commitment to the
treaty.[5]
At the same meeting, Spain’s delegation confirmed that Spain remains
engaged in efforts to universalize the Mine Ban Treaty. It follows the European
Union (EU) strategy of allocating target countries to each EU member. However,
Spain has not identified the countries that it
targets.[6] During its
presidency of the EU in the first half of 2002, Spain encouraged other countries
to join the treaty, particularly during bilateral
contacts.[7] The 1998
legislation includes a preamble in which the government states its intention to
promote the treaty and put it on the agenda of international
fora.[8] On 8 December 2003,
Spain voted in favor of UN General Assembly Resolution 58/43, which calls for
universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty. It has voted for
pro-ban UNGA resolutions each year since 1996.
Spain has rarely engaged in the extensive discussions that States Parties
have had during intersessoinal meetings on matters of interpretation and
implementation related to Articles 1, 2, and 3. It has, however, on other
occasions made known its views and practice on issues related to joint military
operations with non-States Parties, foreign stockpiling and transit of
antipersonnel mines, and antivehicle mines with sensitive fuzes or antihandling
devices.
The Ministry has not responded to Landmine Monitor inquiries about its
position on the legality of Spanish forces engaging in joint military operations
involving antipersonnel mines with countries not members of the Mine Ban Treaty.
However, on 29 September 2003, a Catalan deputy received a written answer to a
parliamentary question specific to Spanish troops sent to
Iraq.[9] The government
answered that Spanish military personnel were forbidden to use antipersonnel
mines under any circumstances, that operations in which antipersonnel mines are
used will not be planned, directed or carried out, and that no forces under
Spanish command will use antipersonnel mines other than under the exceptions
allowed by Article 3 of the Mine Ban
Treaty.[10]
The Ministry of Defense has stated that there are no foreign antipersonnel
mines on Spanish territory, including the US installations at Torrejón
near Madrid and at Rota and Morón de la Frontera near Cádiz. In
February 2000, the Ministry of Defense said that US antipersonnel mines
prohibited by the Mine Ban Treaty had been withdrawn from
Rota.[11]
Asked to clarify the government’s position on the legality of a foreign
State transiting antipersonnel mines through Spanish territory, the Ministry of
Defense referred to the 1998 national law. This states that “by
‘transfer’ is understood not only the actual transportation of mines
from or to a national territory, but also the transfer of command and control
over the mines.”[12]
Spain possesses two antivehicle mines which have antihandling
devices.[13] The government has
taken the view that antivehicle mines with antihandling devices should be dealt
with in the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), by means of a new
protocol.[14] However, Spanish
legislation implementing the Mine Ban Treaty prohibits not only antipersonnel
mines but also “similar weapons.” The Spanish Campaign to Ban
Landmines has argued that antihandling devices capable of being detonated by the
accidental act of a person are thereby already prohibited by Spanish law. The
government has interpreted the legislation otherwise, and excluded antivehicle
mines with antihandling devices or sensitive fuzes from its implementation of
the Mine Ban Treaty and Article 7
reporting.[15]
Spain is a State Party to the CCW and its Amended Protocol II. It attended
the Fifth Annual Conference of States Parties to the Protocol in November 2003,
and submitted the annual Article 13 report required by the Protocol on 7
November 2003. It has attended the annual conferences of States Parties and
submitted reports in previous years. The Ministry of Defense expressed its
support for regulation of explosive remnants of war, including preventive
measures, under the CCW.[16] In
this regard, on 29 October 2002, the Defense Commission approved a green paper
stressing Spain’s view that the use of cluster bombs against civilians
should be banned, and that technical measures allowing for the neutralization,
deactivation and self-destruction of these weapons should be introduced.
Production, Transfer and Use
Production of antipersonnel mines ceased officially in May 1996, and the 1994
export moratorium was made indefinite in
1996.[17] Spain was previously
a producer of at least five types of antipersonnel mine, and also an exporter of
mines.[18] Spain imported mines
from Italy. Spain reported in April 2001 that production facilities had either
been decommissioned or converted to other
uses.[19] Spain last used
antipersonnel mines in 1975, on the Moroccan border with its then-colony of
Western Sahara.
Stockpiling and Destruction
Spain’s antipersonnel mine stockpile destruction program was completed
on 3 October 2000, far in advance of both the October 1998 national
legislation’s three-year deadline and the Mine Ban Treaty’s
four-year deadline of 1 July
2003.[20] Spain possessed
853,286 antipersonnel mines in 1998 when national legislation was passed.
Spain’s initial Article 7 report stated that 496,415 mines of type P-5
were destroyed from July 1998 to December 1999, leaving 356,871 remaining for
destruction.[21]
At the end of 2003, Spain retained 3,815 antipersonnel mines as permitted by
Article 3 of the treaty, a reduction of 185 from the quantity of 4,000 retained
at the end of 2002. How these mines were consumed is not
reported.[22] Spain initially
intended to retain 10,000 mines for permitted purposes, but announced at the
Standing Committee meetings in May 2000 that this would be reduced to 4,000
(3,784 of P-5, and 216 of P-4B). The mines were retained for training in mine
clearance and for the ANGEL research
project.[23] No mines were
consumed in 2001–2002, and the Ministry of Defense explained that their
use in training programs does not require destruction, so each mine can be used
several times.[24]
Mine Action Funding and Assistance
In the UN Security Council in November 2003, Spain stressed that mine action
must remain an international priority and be adequately funded. The Spanish
representative said that during past years Spain had contributed €15
million (over $16 million) for training programs and assistance to mine victims,
and provided demining teams to various
countries.[25] The
details of this contribution, which is much higher than Landmine Monitor
estimates, were not
provided.[26]
Spain has not reported a comprehensive total for its funding of mine action
in 2003, which the Landmine Monitor estimates to be €1,073,579
($1,214,755).[27]
The Spanish Cooperation Agency (AECI) contributed a total of €286,047
($323,662) to several programs of assistance to mine victims in 2003,
including:
Cambodia: €75,398 (85,313) for a survivor assistance program
Kosovo: €135,649 ($153,487) for a program that includes support to
families of mine victims.
Nicaragua: €75,000 ($84,863) for capacity-building and reintegration
of mine survivors, through the Organization of American States
(OAS).[28]
During 2003, the International Demining Training Center (Centro Internacional
de Desminado) provided training courses on humanitarian demining for 71
personnel from Afghanistan, Angola, Mozambique and Colombia. Fourteen courses
were also offered to Spanish military personnel, including those preparing to
serve in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq and Kosovo. Total cost of
the courses in 2003 was €787,532
($891,092).[29] Similar courses
were offered in previous years, with the technical support of the Ministry of
Defense.
In 2003, Spanish demining and explosive ordnance disposal personnel
participated in peacekeeping operations in Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iraq and Kosovo.[30]
Additionally, in 2003 the autonomous community of Asturias donated
€8,000 ($9,052) to the Spanish NGO Acadica for the manufacture of
wheelchairs for mine survivors and others in Cambodia. The Catalan Government
provided €10,000 and Barcelona City Hall provided €6,000 ($6,789) to
the NGO Moviment per la Pau (Movement for Peace, MxP) for two public mine
awareness programs.[31]
In 2002, the AECI contributed €462,625 ($523,460) to programs of
assistance to mine victims in Angola and Honduras and to courses by the
International Demining Training
Center.[32]
From 1999–2003, Spain contributed approximately $4.7 million to mine
action (1999: $1,187,447; 2000: $935,000; 2001: $667,221; 2002: $688,467; 2003:
$1,214,755). However, this is an estimate, as Spanish funding of mine action
has not been reported fully in all
years.[33]
From 1995–1998, Spain contributed about $2.3 million to the UN
Voluntary Trust Fund for Assistance in Mine Action, the OAS, and bilaterally.
Funding from 1995–2003 has been concentrated on Angola, Mozambique,
Central and South America. Some funding has also been directed to Kosovo (1999,
2000, 2001, 2003), Bosnia and Herzegovina (1999, 2000), and Croatia (1999). The
AECI was set up in 1997.[34]
For 2004, the International Demining Training Center expected to offer
courses in humanitarian demining to Chilean, Colombian and Russian
students.[35] The Center was
opened in 2001. Courses are provided with the technical support of the Ministry
of Defense. The Ministry budgeted €1,442,420 ($1,370,299) for the
Center’s infrastructure. In 2002, the Center provided demining training
for personnel from Afghanistan, Angola and Mozambique. AECI provided funding of
€190,604 ($181,074) and Ministry of Defense assistance totaled
€414,712 ($403,462).[36]
In 2001, the Center provided demining training for personnel from Lebanon,
Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica and Guatemala. Funding of courses in 2001 was
not reported.[37]
Spanish policy determining mine action funding was set out in January 2001,
in response to a parliamentary question. The criteria for AECI included
concentration on victim assistance programs, cooperation between government and
NGOs (especially Spanish NGOs), demining in priority countries, use of local
deminers, promotion of the independence of affected communities, and placing
mine clearance in the context of economic and social development. Funds for
demining were to be restricted to countries that are full members of the Mine
Ban Treaty and “show a clear will in favor of
demining.”[38]
The Spanish Campaign to Ban Landmines and other NGOs have expressed concern
at the low level of governmental contribution to mine action programs. In
September 2001, Parliament also urged the Spanish government to increase
resources for demining, victim assistance, and mine
awareness.[39] In response, the
International Demining Training Center was set up, and has expanded its
activities.[40]
Research & Development
In 2001, the Spanish company, GTD Ingenieríade Sistema y de
Software, was reported to be involved in the international ANGEL project on
locating and neutralizing antipersonnel mines. Spain’s October 2003
Article 7 report noted that the Spanish Army provides technical data and other
assistance to the program. Some of the mines that Spain has retained under
Article 3 of the Mine Ban Treaty are used in the
program.[41]
NGO Activities
During 2003, several NGOs and other institutions carried out
awareness-raising activities on the mine issue in Spain. La Caixa Foundation
organized a discussion event on 1 October that was attended by other NGOs, an
UNMAS representative, and mine survivors. This event included Gervasio
Sánchez’s photo exhibition, “Vidas Minadas. Cinco años
después” (Mined lives. Five years later), which was shown
throughout October 2003.
Acadica, in cooperation with the Jesuit Refugee Service, carried out a victim
assistance program in Cambodia; this included provision of schooling and shelter
for children with disabilities, and production of 200 wheelchairs for mine
survivors. The program cost of €57,856 ($65,464) was co-financed by
Acadica and the government of Asturias. Acadica also put out mine awareness
messages on local TV and radio stations. The Catalan NGO Mestres per
Bòsnia (Teachers for Bosnia) conducted mine awareness publicity in 2003.
The Group d’Estudis Pedagògics (Pedagogical Studies Group) launched
a comic book “Mines antipersonal: l’últim pas”
(Antipersonnel Mines: the Last Step) to promote involvement of youngsters in the
mine issue, and organized an exhibition and audiovisual.
In 2003, MxP continued its public awareness activities in schools in
Barcelona and nearby municipalities. On 9 September 2003, a press conference
was organized to launch the Landmine Monitor Report 2003 (with a Catalan
translation of the Executive Summary). MxP also joined the Cluster Munition
Coalition.
In previous years, Spanish NGOs have carried out activities to raise public
awareness of the mine issue and, in particular, the need for assistance for mine
survivors.
[1] For example, Spain did not endorse the
pro-treaty Brussels Declaration of June 1997 until later, and at the Oslo
negotiations floated a proposal that antipersonnel mines should not be banned
when national security demanded otherwise. There was strong support from
parliamentarians and the public for the treaty. See Landmine Monitor Report
1999, pp. 648–650. [2]
“Law Banning Antipersonnel Landmines as well as those Arms with Similar
Effects,” Law 33/1998, Boletin Oficial del Estado, no. 239, 6 October
1998. The law also bans mine delivery
systems. [3] See Landmine Monitor
Report 2002, pp. 451–452. [4]
See Article 7 reports submitted: 30 April 2004 (for calendar year 2003); 22
October 2003 (for calendar year 2002); 7 June 2002 (for the period 28
January–31 December 2001); 15 April 2001 (for the period 28 December
1999–31 December 2000); 15 December 1999 (for the period 1 July–28
December 1999). This leaves the period 1–27 January 2001
unreported. [5] Intervention by Spain,
Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action
Technologies, Geneva, 11 February
2004. [6] Interview with Luis
Gómez Nogueira, Department of General Security and Disarmament, Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 11 February
2004. [7] Government answer to
parliamentary question by Deputy Carles Campuzano, Secretaria de Estado de
Relaciones con las Cortes, 30 April
2002. [8] See Landmine Monitor Report
1999, p. 650. [9] Parliamentary
question by Deputy Carles Campuzano, 31 July
2003. [10] Government answer to
question by Dep. Carles Campuzano, Journal of Sessions (official publication),
18 November 2003. [11] See Landmine
Monitor Report 2001, p. 786, and Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p.
451. [12] Law 33/1998, Article 1. See
Landmine Monitor Report 2001, p.
786. [13] See Landmine Monitor Report
2001, p. 787. [14] Letter from Lt.
Col. Jose Quevedo, Dirección General de Política de Defensa,
Unidad de Control de Armamento, Ministry of Defense, 23 January 2003. Spain, as
President of the EU in 2002, also put this forward as the position of the Union
– see Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p.
452. [15] See Landmine Monitor Report
2000, pp. 722–723, and Landmine Monitor Report 2002, pp.
452–453. [16] Letter from
Lt.Col. Jose Quevedo, Ministry of Defense, 23 January
2003. [17] Intervention by Spain,
Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 11 February 2004. This confirmed previous
statements to this effect. [18] The
five types were: Expal P-4B, P-4A, P-5, P-5AR (with antihandling device), and
P-Salta. There were five manufacturing companies: Bressel, Explosivos Alaveses
(Expal), Explosivos de Burgos, Fabricaciones Extremeñas, and Unión
Española de Explosivos, which were all part of the DEFEX (Defense and
Export) group controlled by the Industry National Institute and in receipt of
public subsidies. Spanish mines have been found in Iraq, Mauritania, the
Falklands, and Morocco. See Landmine Monitor Report 1999, pp.
650–651. [19] Article 7 Report,
Form E, 15 April 2001. [20] See
Landmine Monitor Report 1999, pp. 650–654; Landmine Monitor Report 2001,
pp. 785–786. [21] Article 7
Report, Forms B, G, 15 December 1999. The original stockpile consisted of five
types: P-5 (597,011), P-4B (163,579), P-5AR (28,700), P-S1A (27,188), and P-S1
(36,808). [22] Article 7 Report, Form
D, 30 April 2004. [23] Article 7
Report, Form D, 15 December 1999; Intervention by Spain, Standing Committee on
General Status and Operation of the Convention, Geneva, 30 May
2000. [24] Letter from Lt. Col. Jose
Quevedo, Ministry of Defense, 23 January
2003. [25] “Action against mines
dynamic component of peacekeeping operations, Under-Secretary-General tells
Security Council,” Press Release, UN Security Council, 13 November 2003.
[26] Landmine Monitor estimates that
Spanish donations to mine action totaled about $4.7 million in 1999–2003
and $2.3 million in
1995–1998. [27] Exchange rate
for 2003 of €1=$1.1315, used throughout this report. US Federal Reserve,
“List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 2 January
2004. [28] Article 7 Report, Form J,
30 April 2004 (for calendar year 2003). The donation of €75,000 to
Nicaragua was spent in 2003 from the 2002 budget. Total expenditure in 2002 has
been reduced accordingly. [29] Ibid,
and Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report, Form F, 7 November 2003.
[30] Intervention by Spain, Standing
Committee on Mine Clearance, 11 February
2004. [31] Article 7 Report, Form J,
30 April 2004 (for calendar year
2003). [32] Article 7 Report, Form J,
22 October 2003 (for calendar year
2002). [33] See previous editions of
Landmine Monitor, and Mine Action Investments database, www.mineaction.org , accessed on 4 June
2004. No funding data was recorded for Spain.
[34] See Landmine Monitor Report
1999, pp. 654–655, and Landmine Monitor Report 2000, p.
725. [35] Intervention by Spain,
Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 11 February
2004. [36] Letter from Lt. Col. Jose
Quevedo, Ministry of Defense, 23 January 2003. Exchange rate €1=US$0.95.
US Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 6 January
2003. [37] Intervention by Spain,
Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, 11 February 2004; Letter from Manuel
Morato Ferro, Ministry of Defense, 24 October
2001. [38] See Landmine Monitor Report
2001, pp. 788–789. [39] See
Landmine Monitor Report 2003, p.
436. [40] See Landmine Monitor Report
2001, pp. 788–789. [41] Article
7 Report, Form J, 22 October 2003; CCW Amended Protocol II Article 13 Report,
Form E, 11 October 2002. See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 455.