Key developments since May 2004: Poland changed its policy and has
begun the internal process of ratifying the Mine Ban Treaty. The Ministry of
Defense said there were no obstacles to destruction of Poland’s stockpile
of 997,680 antipersonnel mines and estimated destruction should not take more
than two years. Defense officials indicated Poland will keep about 5,000
antipersonnel mines for training purposes. In April 2005, Poland submitted its
third voluntary Article 7 transparency report. In 2004, 1,517 antipersonnel and
antivehicle mines and 52,308 UXO were destroyed in clearance and explosive
ordnance disposal operations; in the first quarter of 2005, 564 landmines and
2,368 UXO were cleared by EOD teams. Poland contributed 424 military engineers
to missions abroad which include mine clearance duties; this assistance is
valued at US$1.74 million.
Mine Ban Policy
The Republic of Poland signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 4 December 1997 but has
yet to ratify. From 1997 to 2003, Polish officials insisted that a series of
preconditions must be met before Poland could
ratify.[1] However, Poland changed
this position in 2004. At the First Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty in
November-December 2004, Poland officially announced for the first time that
“Poland is ready to initiate the process of ratification of the Ottawa
Convention.”[2] It also stated,
“Although not all of the preconditions for the ratification specified by
Poland in 1997 are fulfilled, we hope that in the future all main state actors
and our neighbors will join this important treaty of international humanitarian
law.”[3]
In September 2004, the Ministry of Defense changed its position on
ratification based on a study completed by a group of military experts and
approved by the General Staff in August 2004. The study concluded that the role
of antipersonnel mines in the country’s defense system and in operations
outside Poland in which Polish Armed Forces might participate is diminishing.
The study also concluded that while the development of alternative means to
antipersonnel mines would be a long, costly and difficult process, it would be
realistic to introduce in a relatively short time solutions regarding doctrine,
training and organization, as well as modified means of warfare, which together
could, at least partly, substitute for antipersonnel
mines.[4]
The Minister of Defense declared on 21 September 2004 that “the MoD
sees no obstacles for initiating a process of ratification of the Ottawa
Convention in our country.” He added that the ratification should be
initiated “under the assumption that it will be completed no sooner than
in 2006...so the destruction of Polish stockpiles would then, according to Art.
4 of the Convention, be finished in
2010.”[5]
By June 2005, representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry
of Defense had prepared all the formal documents required for the ratification
process.[6] The Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, which is in charge of the ratification process, will submit these
documents to the Council of Ministers for interministerial
consultations.[7] Representatives of
the Ministry of Defense told Landmine Monitor that they thought it was unlikely
that consultations would take place until after the parliamentary elections
scheduled for September 2005, because the consultations would need to be
repeated again after the elections. They believed that ratification would not
occur until 2006, and more likely in
2007.[8] A representative of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the new post-election Council of Ministers
would be able to use the ratification package already prepared. He indicated
that the new Prime Minister would send the draft ratification law to the new
parliament when it starts work in November, and said he thought the process
should not last more than three months if ratification is considered a
priority.[9]
In its statement to the First Review Conference in Nairobi, Poland said,
“The role of antipersonnel mines in the Polish defence system has been
recently and comprehensively reviewed and redefined. Polish Army experts came
to the conclusion that there are no obstacles to resign from this type of
military equipment. It is also possible from a technical and financial point of
view to provide the Army with an alternative weapon
systems.”[10]
On 3 December 2004 Poland voted in favor of UN General Assembly Resolution
59/84, which calls for universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty. Poland has voted for each of the annual pro-ban UNGA resolutions since
1996.
On 11 May 2005, Poland submitted its third voluntary Article 7 transparency
report. This submission included optional Form J with information on Polish
mine action assistance.[11]
In June 2005, Poland attended the meetings of the intersessional Standing
Committees in Geneva, but did not make any statements.
Poland joined Amended Protocol II of the Convention on Conventional Weapons
on 15 October 2003. Poland attended the sixth annual meeting of State Parties
to Amended Protocol II in November 2004 and submitted an annual report in
accordance with Article 13.
NGO Activities
In November 2004, the Polish Red Cross sent out an open editorial,
“Ending the landmine era...,” and press kits on the First Review
Conference to all national
media.[12] On 9 December 2004, a
representative of the Polish Red Cross made a presentation on the outcome of the
Review Conference, and the Canadian Ambassador to Poland gave a short history of
the Mine Ban Treaty, at a conference titled Contemporary Challenges in
International Humanitarian Law, at Warsaw University.
On 31 March 2005, the Polish Campaign to Ban Landmines took part in the NGO
Information Evening organized at the College of Europe in Natolin, Warsaw. It
presented the goals, history and work of the ICBL and made available
informational materials and cards to sign which called on the Prime Minister to
ratify the Mine Ban Treaty
immediately.[13]
Production, Transfer and Use
In September 2002, Poland confirmed that it was already complying with the
Mine Ban Treaty prohibitions on production and transfer of antipersonnel
mines.[14] In the past, Poland
produced three types of antipersonnel mines, and imported a fourth
type.[15] Poland exported
antipersonnel mines until 1993.[16]
An export moratorium in 1995 was made permanent by a Cabinet decree on 7 April
1998,[17] which was then superseded
by a law adopted in September
2002.[18]
In March 2004, the Ministry of Defense re-stated its previous position that
any decision to allow transit through Poland of foreign antipersonnel mines
would be “of a political character” and that “in regard to the
NATO allies probably regulations adopted in frame of the ‘SOFA’
[Status of Forces] agreement will be
relevant.”[19]
The Ministry of Defense has stated that antipersonnel mines are used
exclusively for training demining troops, and that no antipersonnel mines are
used in joint military operations with other States not party to the Mine Ban
Treaty.[20]
Stockpiling and Destruction
Poland reported that it possessed a stockpile of 997,680 antipersonnel mines
at the end of 2004.[21] In May
2005, representatives of the Ministry of Defense told Landmine Monitor that
Poland will keep about 5,000 antipersonnel mines for training
purposes.[22] Poland’s first
Article 7 report disclosed a stockpile of 1,055,971 antipersonnel mines at the
end of 2002.[23] During 2003,
58,291 POMZ-2(2M) mines were dismantled due to expiry of shelf
life.[24]
In February 2001, the Ministry of Defense confirmed that Poland possesses
Claymore-type directional fragmentation mines, and said that these are
“meant exclusively for mine-controlled detonation...[which] excludes the
possibility of accidental detonation.” The MON-100 is described in the
first Article 7 report as “Directional fragmentation mine, if equipped
with a MUW fuse attached to a trip
wire.”[25]
In July 2005, the Ministry of Defense (MoD) estimated that destruction of
Polish stockpiles should not take more than two
years.[26] The MoD stated in
September 2004, “There are no organizational, technical, nor financial
obstacles, which would prevent destruction of Polish stockpiles in the given
period of 4 years since the entry into force of the Convention for
Poland.”[27] According to the
MoD, destruction will not start before
ratification.[28]
Landmine Problem and Clearance
As previously reported in the Landmine Monitor, Poland remains contaminated
by mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) from World War II and the Soviet
occupation. The most contaminated areas are the Vistula and Odra drainage
basins, and forest areas in the southeast. Mines and UXO are discovered most
often in urbanized areas during construction work. The majority of the
contamination is UXO, and for this reason Poland does not consider itself to be
mine-affected.
In June 2005, the MoD reiterated its position that “in Poland there are
no contaminated areas or areas which would be suspected of being contaminated.
Annually on Polish territory there are only single mines being found. According
to the MoD’s statistics, antipersonnel and antivehicle mines represent
less than 0.1 percent of all dangerous and explosive items found annually on
Polish territory. Therefore the MoD believes that Poland should not be
considered as a “mine-affected
country.”[29] Similar
statements have been made in Poland's Amended Protocol II Article 13
reports.[30]
There is no formal civilian mine action program in Poland. Mine clearance
and explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) are conducted by the Armed Forces. Data
on clearance and EOD is recorded by the Command of Military Engineering
Forces.
In 2004, 37 demining and EOD teams (making a total of 237 soldiers) were
involved in 8,547 responses to mines and UXO, clearing 1,396 antipersonnel and
antivehicle mines and 37,667 UXO. Planned clearance was conducted by 184
soldiers at the former military bases of Lambinowice and Okonek, as well as in
Doleszowo, Golczewo, and Brozek. During 2004, 2,137 hectares were cleared,
destroying in the process 121 antipersonnel and antivehicle mines and 14,641
UXO. In the first quarter of 2005, EOD patrols were involved in 768 responses,
in the course of which 564 landmines and 2,368 UXO were
cleared.[31]
In 2004, there were no accidents causing casualties during clearance and EOD
operations in Poland.
The cost of mine/UXO clearance and EOD in Poland is covered by the
government. In 2004, EOD response cost PLN11.4 million (some $3.5 million) and
planned clearance cost a further PLN1.6 million
($500,000).[32]
Support to Mine Action
Poland continued to provide in-kind assistance for mine action in other
mine-affected countries. In 2004, 424 Polish military engineers were engaged in
peacekeeping and stabilization missions abroad, with duties including mine/UXO
clearance, EOD and mine risk
education.[33] Polish EOD teams,
including 128 sappers, were directly responsible for mine/UXO clearance and
disposal as part of the following missions: UNDOS (Syria, one EOD team), KFOR
(Kosovo, one EOD team), SFOR (Bosnia and Herzegovina, two EOD teams), and
stabilization forces (Iraq, seven EOD
teams).[34] Poland estimated the
value of this in-kind assistance in 2004 at €1.4 million ($1.74
million).[35]
Landmine/UXO Casualties and Survivor Assistance
In 2004, police sources reported 10 new casualties in Poland, including four
people killed and six people injured (one was a child), as a result of handling
UXO on military training grounds. It is believed that casualties were
collecting scrap metal.[36] This
represents a decrease from the five civilians killed (one child) and 11 injured
(five children) in UXO incidents in
2003.[37]
On 7 May 2004, one Polish national was killed and another injured in a
landmine incident in Iraq.[38] On 9
May 2004, a Polish officer in Iraq was killed by a
landmine.[39] Since 1999, five
Polish nationals have been killed and eight injured by mines while engaged in
military, peacekeeping or mine clearance operations and other activities outside
of Poland.[40]
The total number of mine/UXO casualties in Poland is not known. Between 1944
and 1994, 658 soldiers were killed and several thousand injured in clearance
operations, and between 1945 and 1973, 3,833 civilians (including 3,189
children) were killed and 8,221 (including 6,656 children) injured in mine/UXO
incidents.[41]
The Ministry of Health reports that mine/UXO survivors are entitled to the
same standards of public healthcare as all other insured persons. All necessary
surgical and rehabilitation services are provided free of charge, including
prostheses and most orthopedic equipment, except for crutches and orthopedic
shoes, which are partly
subsidized.[42] Military casualties
are entitled to medicine and orthopedic equipment free of
charge.[43] On 1 January 2004, a
new law gave people permanently unable to work as a result of war-related
injuries, including mine and UXO survivors, entitlement to compensation.
Entitlement to compensation includes those who did not take part in the
hostilities but were affected by direct fighting in the period 1939–1947,
and those who were injured by an UXO explosion during and after the war, but not
after 1956. Compensation amounts to 50 percent of the lowest monthly pension
for persons with
disabilities.[44]
[1] The main pre-conditions were
that all permanent members of the UN Security Council and countries neighboring
Poland should first join the treaty, and that the Polish Armed Forces should be
supplied with alternative weapons.
[2] Statement by Poland, Nairobi
Summit on a Mine-Free World (First Review Conference), Nairobi, 3 December
2004.
[3] Statement by Poland, First
Review Conference, Nairobi, 3 December 2004.
[4] Letter from Jerzy Szmajdzinski,
Minister of Defense, to Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Warsaw, 21 September 2004.
[5] Letter from Jerzy Szmajdzinski,
Minister of Defense, to Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Warsaw, 21 September 2004.
[6] ICBL interview with Andrzej
Misztal, Deputy Director, Legal and Treaty Department, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, Geneva, 9 August 2005; interview with Col. Marek Zadrozny and Maj.
Zbigniew Ciolek, Department of International Co-operation, Ministry of Defense,
Col. Slawomir Berdak, Head Expert of the General Board of Support, General
Staff, and Lt. Lech Gawrych, Senior Expert, Command of Military Engineering
Forces, Warsaw, 31 May 2005.
[7] According to the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, the documents include a draft implementation plan prepared by
the Polish Armed Forces and a draft ratification law with two articles. ICBL
interview with Andrzej Misztal, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 9August 2005.
[8] Interview with Col. Marek
Zadrozny, Maj. Zbigniew Ciolek, Col. Slawomir Berdak and Lt. Lech Gawrych,
Warsaw, 31 May 2005.
[9] ICBL interview with Andrzej
Misztal, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Geneva, 9August 2005.
[10] Statement of Poland, First
Review Conference, Nairobi, 3 December 2004.
[11] Forms A, B and H were
unchanged and Forms C, D, E, F, G and I were marked not applicable. Only Form J
provided new information. Poland submitted an initial voluntary Article 7 report
on 5 March 2003, revealing for the first time details of Poland’s
stockpile of antipersonnel mines, and a second report on 12 May 2004.
[12] Andrzej Trybusz, President,
Polish Red Cross, “Polozyc kres erze min...,” 15 February 2004, www.pck.org.pl.
[13] Katarzyna Derlicka, Polish
CBL, “Poland: Future eurocrats learn about the ICBL and the role of
NGOs,” 15 April 2005, www.icbl.org.
[14] Statement by Poland, Fourth
Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 16-20 September 2002.
[15] Production of the PMD-6
ceased in 1957, of the POMZ-2 in the 1960s, and of the MON-100 in 1988. The
PSM-1 was last imported in the 1980s from Bulgaria. Article 7 Report, Forms B
and H, 5 March 2003; interview with Col. Lech Zajda, Military Engineering
Command, General Staff, and Maj. Artur Talik, Engineering Corps Command,
Ministry of Defense, Warsaw, 20 March 2003. The Ministry of Defense added that
stocks of the MOP-2 signaling mine were used up in 2002 in training.
[16] In November 1995 Poland
informed the UN that export had been halted de facto following adoption
of UN General Assembly Resolution 48/75 in December 1993. “Report of the
Secretary-General: Moratorium on the export of antipersonnel mines,” UN
General Assembly, 3 November 1995, p. 15.
[17] Article 7 Report, Form A, 5
March 2003; letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2004.
[18] “Ordinance of the
Council of Ministers of August 20, 2002 concerning the imposition of prohibition
and restriction on transfer of goods of strategic importance for the state
security,” Journal of Laws, 6 September 2002. Translation by
Landmine Monitor researcher.
[19] Information from Ministry of
Defense in letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2004; letter from
Adam Kobieracki, Director, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, 27 March 2003.
[20] Information from Ministry of
Defense in letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2004; letter from
Adam Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 27 March 2003.
[21] Article 7 Report, Form B, 12
May 2004 which lists 997,680 mines, and Article 7 Report, 11 May 2005 which
notes no change in Form B. The stockpile consisted of PMD-6 (686,483),
POMZ-2(2M) (277,686), PSM-1 (13,589) and MON-100 (19,922).
[22] Interview with Col. Marek
Zadrozny, Maj. Zbigniew Ciolek, Col. Slawomir Berdak and Lt. Lech Gawrych,
Warsaw, 31 May 2005.
[23] Article 7 Report, Form B, 5
March 2003.
[24] Article 7 Report, Form B, 12
May 2004.
[25] Information from the
Ministry of Defense in letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 28 February
2001; Article 7 Report, Form H2, 5 March 2003. The “MUW” is likely
the MUV fuze.
[26] Information from Ministry of
Defense, contained in letter from Robert Kupiecki, Director, Department of
Security Policy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 5 July 2005.
[27] Letter from Jerzy
Szmajdzinski, Minister of Defense, to Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Minister of
Foreign Affairs, 21 September 2004.
[28] Interview with Col. Marek
Zadrozny, Maj. Zbigniew Ciolek, Col. Slawomir Berdak and Lt. Lech Gawrych,
Warsaw, 31 May 2005.
[29] Information from Ministry of
Defense, contained in letter from Robert Kupiecki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
5 July 2005.
[30] CCW Amended Protocol II
Article 13 Reports, Form B, 15 October 2003 and 8 October 2004 ; see Landmine
Monitor Report 2004, p. 909.
[31] Information from Ministry of
Defense, contained in letter from Robert Kupiecki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
5 July 2005.
[32] Information from Ministry of
Defense, contained in letter from Robert Kupiecki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
5 July 2005.
[33] Article 7 Report, Form J, 29
April 2005.
[34] Article 7 Report, Form J, 29
April 2005.
[35] Interview with Col. Marek
Zadrozny, Maj. Zbigniew Ciolek, Col. Slawomir Berdak and Lt. Lech Gawrych,
Warsaw, 31 May 2005. Average exchange rate for 2004: €1 = $1.2438. US
Federal Reserve, “List of Exchange Rates (Annual),” 3 January 2005.
[36] Information from Police Head
Command, in a letter from Robert Kupiecki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 22 July
2005.
[37] See Landmine Monitor
Report 2004, p. 910.
[38] “TV crew members
killed by land mine in Iraq – Polish official,” Polish Radio
1, 7 May 2004. An Algerian was also killed in the incident. All were part
of a Polish television crew.
[39] “Two Polish servicemen
die in Iraq,” PAP (news agency), 9 May 2004. The second fatality
was not mine-related. On 24 March and 8 May, two Polish soldiers were also
injured in Iraq in booby-trap explosions.
[40] For more information see
Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 911.
[41] See Landmine Monitor
Report 2004, p. 911.
[42] Interview with Zofia Gasiuk,
Physician, Warsaw, 15 May 2005.
[43] Information from Ministry of
Health in letter from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 15 March 2004.
[44] “Act of 20 July 2001
on assistance for civilian victims of war,”entered into force 1
January 2004; see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 911.