+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
 
Table of Contents
Country Reports
ZIMBABWE, Landmine Monitor Report 2005

Zimbabwe

Key developments since May 2004: In August 2005, Zimbabwe developed a five-year plan for the clearance of all mined areas, to comply with Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty. The plan is estimated to cost almost US$30 million. In September 2005, clearance of the Victoria Falls-Mlibizi area, which has been a demining priority for five years, was reported to be almost complete.

Mine Ban Policy

The Republic of Zimbabwe signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997, ratified on 18 June 1998, and the treaty entered into force on 1 March 1999. In January 2001, Zimbabwe enacted the Anti-Personnel Mines (Prohibition) Act 2000, which incorporates the Mine Ban Treaty into Zimbabwe’s domestic law.[1]

On 8 July 2005, Zimbabwe submitted its fifth Article 7 report, for calendar year 2004.[2] It includes voluntary Form J with information on victim assistance activities.

Zimbabwe participated in the First Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty in Nairobi in November-December 2004, where its representative said that the treaty had not been a “success story” for Zimbabwe, and his delegation therefore found it difficult to celebrate the First Review Conference. He noted the country’s “now familiar story.... Our request for assistance has not elicited any positive response, with potential donors choosing to look the other way.... As a nation we simply do not have the adequate resources that match the enormity of the challenge” of addressing the country’s mine contamination.[3]

At the June 2005 intersessional Standing Committee meetings in Geneva, Zimbabwe made a presentation on its problems, plans, progress and priorities to meet its Article 5 obligation to clear all mined areas by March 2009.

Zimbabwe has rarely engaged in the extensive discussions that States Parties have had on matters of interpretation and implementation related to Articles 1, 2 and 3, and, more specifically, the issues of joint military operations with non-States Parties and the prohibition on “assist,” foreign stockpiling and transit of antipersonnel mines, antivehicle mines with sensitive fuzes or antihandling devices, and the acceptable number of mines retained for training. However, at the intersessional meetings in May 2002, Zimbabwe informed States Parties that it would not participate in planning and implementation of activities related to antipersonnel mine use in joint operations, and that its troops remained bound by “our domestic laws even if they are operating beyond our borders.”[4]

Production, Transfer and Stockpiling

Zimbabwe was a past producer and exporter of antipersonnel mines, but not a significant one.[5] Zimbabwe destroyed its stockpile of 4,092 antipersonnel mines on 15 November 2000, retaining 700 mines for training purposes.[6] According to Zimbabwe’s Article 7 reports, none of the retained mines have been consumed (destroyed) during training activities. Zimbabwe has not yet reported in any detail on the intended purposes and actual uses of its retained mines―a step agreed to by States Parties in the Nairobi Action Plan that emerged from the First Review Conference.[7]

In 2003, a representative of Zimbabwe confirmed to Landmine Monitor that Claymore-type mines are stockpiled by its armed forces, but without tripwire fuzes, because Zimbabwe considers these illegal under the Mine Ban Treaty.[8]

Landmine/UXO Problem

The landmine and unexploded ordnance (UXO) problem in Zimbabwe is the result of minefields laid by the Rhodesian army along the northern and eastern borders of Zimbabwe at the height of the war of liberation between 1976 and 1979. The minefields stretch for 700 kilometers, of which 40 percent were reported to have been cleared.[9] They were emplaced on movement corridors likely to be used by armed opposition groups, with the aim to prevent their movement from “safe” bases in Mozambique and Zambia.[10] The majority of the mines laid were antipersonnel blast and directional fragmentation mines. The minefields were laid in standard patterns, and were marked with warning signs.[11]

In its Five Year Action Plan 2004-2009, Zimbabwe stated that four provinces are affected by landmines, while all nine provinces in the country are affected by UXO.[12] The continued threat of landmines has restricted developmental progress, such as the construction of bridges, schools, roads and boreholes. In some areas, distribution of electricity to outlying communities, as well as agro-forestry, livestock, tourism and mining industries, have failed to expand or even commence.[13] According to Zimbabwe’s Article 7 report of July 2005, mined areas are found in seven locations, from Msengezi to Nyamapanda South (Rwenya), Stapleford Forest to Mutare, Burma Valley, Junction Gate to Jersey Tea Estate, Malvernia (Sango) to Crooks Corner, Victoria Falls to Mlibizi, and Kariba power station.[14] In addition, an area described as Lusulu in Gwayi, Matabeleland North, is reported as suspected of containing mines; the area was partially cleared in 2002, but still remains dangerous.[15]

In September 2005, however, the Director of the Zimbabwe Mine Action Centre (ZIMAC) provided slightly different figures for the clearance remaining in Zimbabwe. He reported that there were six minefields along Zimbabwe’s borders, “with five yet to be cleared, however surveys conducted indicate the sizes of the minefields in the form of lengths in kilometers and not in area.” These are Msengezi to Rwenya River (205 kilometers), Sheba Forest to Beacon Hill (50 kilometers), Burma Valley (3 kilometers), Rusite to Muzite Mission (75 kilometers), Sango Border Post to Limpopo River (50 kilometers),[16] with a total length of 383 kilometers.[17]

Mine Action Program

There is an established mine clearance program in Zimbabwe, although it has faltered for a number of years due to limited funding. At the First Review Conference, Zimbabwe referred to the absence of international funding of the country's mine action activities.[18] The Director of ZIMAC stated that Zimbabwe has not received international funding for mine action since 2000.[19] Reportedly, funding requests to the European Commission and the US in 2004 were rejected.[20] Also, no in-kind assistance has been given, and international agencies have not funded demining, victim assistance or mine risk education. Nevertheless, the government states that it is committed to clearing all mines by 2009, and will provide funds in its annual budgeting process between 2005 and 2009.[21]

Zimbabwe's mine action bodies are the National Mine Action Authority (NAMAZ), which regulates mine action activities, Zimbabwe Mine Action Centre (ZIMAC), which implements and coordinates demining activities, and the National Demining Office (NDO), which carries out demining and mine risk education (MRE).[22]

The Implementation Plan 2005-2009, referred to by Zimbabwe in a preparatory document for the First Review Conference, states two objectives in relation to mine action, “To clear all mined areas by 2009 dependant on adequate funding from national resources and the donor community according to humanitarian and socio-economic priorities set by the Government of Zimbabwe,” and “To initiate and provide comprehensive and effective MRE programmes in all schools in the four affected provinces throughout the 5 years,” initiating community-based MRE in all villages, business centers and towns in all mine-affected districts by 2009.[23]

Mine clearance operations are said to be undertaken and implemented in areas of social and economic development, where land is needed for resettlement and grazing.[24] The implementation plan specifies priority clearance of five areas from 2005-2009, at an estimated cost of $43 million. Resources available from national sources are estimated as $1,150,000 for this period, leaving a shortfall of $41,850,000. The five year MRE budget is $660,000, for which national resources are $160,000 leaving a shortfall of $500,000.[25]

However, ZIMAC stated that the plan is costed at $29.1 million; the plan sets targets for each year: for 2004, complete clearance of remaining four-kilometer portion of the 220-kilometer Victoria Falls-Mlibizi minefield; for 2005, clear the 50-kilometer Gonarezhou National Park; for 2006-2007, clear the 130-kilometer Rwenya-Msengezi minefield; for 2008, clear the 50-kilometer Sheba Forest-Beacon Hill minefield; for 2009, clear the 78-kilometer minefield in Manicaland province.[26]

The Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) is the only body undertaking demining activities in Zimbabwe.[27]

Survey and Assessment

No surveys have been conducted since January 2004.[28] Level II survey was conducted by MineTech in the Malvernia (Songo) to Crooks Corner area in 2001.[29] In 1994, MineTech conducted an extensive level one survey of all mined areas, with the exception of Kariba power station, with funds from the European Union. In 1997, an additional survey was carried out in the Rwenya-Msengezi area, in preparation for clearance.[30] The Article 7 report for 2004 mentions that the Kariba power station has not yet been surveyed.[31]

Mine and UXO Clearance

Under Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty, Zimbabwe must destroy all antipersonnel mines in mined areas under its jurisdiction or control as soon as possible, but not later than 1 March 2009.

Based on its implementation plan for 2004-2009, the government aims to meet this deadline.[32] The main problem hampering mine clearance is said to be shortage of equipment. Vehicles, camping, protective clothing and detection equipment are all reported to need repair and replacement.[33] The Director of ZIMAC stated that the government alone cannot sustain the logistical support needed, nor can it re-equip the demining unit.[34]

Zimbabwe’s Article 7 reports for 2003 and 2004 indicate that clearance was conducted in two areas in 2004, Stapleford Forest, where the estimated mine density has been reduced by 8,000 mines between the two reporting periods, and the Victoria Falls to Mlibizi area, where mine density is stated as approximately 1,000 at the end of 2004, compared to 2,099 in 2003.[35] The Article 7 report for 2004 states that approximately 2.8 kilometers remain to be cleared, but does not report the area already cleared.[36] A total of 19,000 mines is reported to have been destroyed in the Victoria Falls clearance, some 17,901 more than the fall in estimated density between 2003 and 2004 for the area.[37]

ZNA has been clearing the Victoria Falls-Mlibizi minefield for the past five years. At the beginning of September 2005, the ZIMAC director stated that clearance was almost complete, and that preparations for handover of the cleared land to the local authorities were underway. He expected that, “By the time the Landmine Monitor is produced, the operation will have been concluded.”[38]

The Msengezi-Rwenya area has not been subject to clearance or survey since 2002. The Article 7 reports for 2003 and 2004 indicate an increase in estimated mine density of 375,372 antipersonnel mines and 2,105 PloughShare mines between the two reporting periods; no explanation is given for this increase in the reports.[39]

After completing clearance of the Victoria Falls-Mlibizi minefield, the ZNA demining corps was due to be deployed to a new minefield. ZIMAC stated that priority would be given to the Gaza-Kruger-Gonarezhou Transfrontier Park.[40] However, as of May 2005, ZNA was said to be embarking on a demining exercise to clear landmines along the border with Mozambique in Chikombedzi, which is part of the Malvernia (Sango) Border Post to Crooks Corner minefield. The area was said to be contaminated with landmines planted during the liberation struggle, to deter freedom fighters from crossing the border to and from Mozambique.[41] This area is also indicated as the highest priority in the Article 7 report of 8 July 2005.[42]

Mine Risk Education

Mine risk education is said to follow the International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) to ensure effective implementation. ZIMAC is the responsible body for coordinating MRE activities through use of mass media, local entertainment, publications, web sites and other events to disseminate mine awareness messages.[43]

Shortage of resources has also affected MRE programs in Zimbabwe. In 2004, “very little or no MRE activities were carried out owing to availability of funding.”[44] In 2005, there was a critical shortage of campaign material, such as fliers, handouts, pencils, pens, rulers, charts and T-shirts, as well as fuel for vehicles.[45]

In 2005, UNDP and the Civil Protection Unit (CPU) under the Ministry of Local Public Works and National Housing, in partnership with the Ministry of Defence, pledged $10,000 for MRE, survivor assistance and mine clearance.[46] According to the Director of ZIMAC, however, by 1 September 2005 no funds had been released.[47]

Landmine/UXO Casualties

In 2004, ZIMAC reported no new landmine casualties; however, four men were injured in two UXO incidents.[48] This represents a significant decrease from 2003, when ZIMAC reported 26 new mine/UXO casualties (five killed and 21 injured).[49]

From January to July 2005, ZIMAC reported one man killed and four injured in separate landmine incidents, and three children killed and two men injured in three UXO incidents.[50]

The total number of mine casualties in Zimbabwe is unknown as no comprehensive records are available. Between 1980 and 2003, at least 53 people were killed and 260 injured in reported landmine incidents.[51] Zimbabwe reports that nationwide casualty data is being collected in order to establish a database, but that lack of funding is preventing completion of the project.[52]

On 25 April 2005, two Zimbabwean mine clearance experts were killed and one was seriously injured while removing landmines on Kinmen Island, in Taiwan.[53] On 18 July 2005, two Zimbabweans were killed and one was seriously injured during a mine clearance operation in Afghanistan.[54]

Survivor Assistance

In recent years, Zimbabwe’s healthcare system has reportedly deteriorated, due to poor funding, lack of qualified staff, severe deterioration of health facilities, and the lack of essential medical supplies and drugs. Access is difficult for mine survivors living in remote areas, and some mine casualties are believed to die before reaching a suitably equipped medical facility. Emergency medical care and basic prostheses or crutches are provided free of charge in rehabilitation centers, but continued or follow-up medical care and replacement of artificial limbs costs the survivors and their families. Many mine survivors from poor rural communities do not have the resources to pay for ongoing care and rehabilitation, and have limited access to these centers.[55]

The Zimbabwe Mine Action Centre includes the Victims Assistance, Rehabilitation, Reintegration and Resettlement Office; however, there is no comprehensive landmine survivor assistance program. Assistance for all people with disabilities is the responsibility of the Social Dimension Fund of the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare, with some activities implemented through the National Association of Societies for the Care of the Handicapped (NASCOH). NASCOH’s activities in 2004 included lobbying and advocacy for the formulation of comprehensive disability policies, and conducting research on education, employment, housing and transportation for people with disabilities.[56] Other organizations working with persons with disabilities include the Dorothy Duncan Center for the Blind and Physically Disabled, Ruwa Rehabilitation Center and Danhiko Rehabilitation Center.[57]

Zimbabwe submitted the voluntary Form J with its annual Article 7 report for 2004, to report on victim assistance activities.

Zimbabwe has legislation to protect the rights of persons with disabilities, particularly in relation to rehabilitation and employment; however, a lack of resources for training and education severely limits opportunities.[58]


[1] Article 7 Report, Form A, 1 December 2003. The ICBL expressed concern about a provision in the Act relating to joint military operations with a country not party to the Mine Ban Treaty. See Landmine Monitor Report 2001, p. 176.

[2] Previous Article 7 reports were submitted on 11 January 2000, 4 April 2001, 13 February 2003 and 1 December 2003.

[3] Statement by Amb. E. Muzonzini, Zimbabwe’s Ambassador to Kenya, Nairobi Summit on a Mine-Free World (First Review Conference), Nairobi, 2 December 2004.

[4] See Landmine Monitor Report 2002, p. 532, for more detail on Zimbabwe’s statement.

[5] The government states, “Zimbabwe never had any capability to produce any type of anti-personnel or any other mine.” Article 7 Report, Form E, 8 July 2005. Other sources indicate production of two types of Claymore mines, the Z1 and ZAPS, ended when Zimbabwe gained independence in 1980, while production of PloughShare mines was stopped between 1990 and 1993. For more information on past production and export, see Landmine Monitor Report 1999, pp. 97-99.

[6] Zimbabwe destroyed 3,846 PMD-6 mines and 246 R2M2 mines. It is retaining 500 PMD-6 and 200 R2M2 mines. Article 7 Report, Form B, 8 July 2005.

[7] In its Article 7 reports, Zimbabwe states, “The mines will be used during training of our troops and deminers in order to enable them to identify and learn how to detect, handle, neutralize and destroy the mines in our minefields.” Article 7 Report, Form B, 8 July 2005.

[8] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, Director, Zimbabwe Mine Action Centre (ZIMAC), Geneva, 4 February 2003.

[9] “Demining gets UNDP backing,” Chronicle, 2 August 2004.

[10] UN, “Country profile: Zimbabwe,” www.mineaction.org.

[11] M. Rupiya, Landmines in Zimbabwe: A Deadly Legacy (Harare: SAPES Books, 1988), p. 20.

[12] Statement by Amb. E. Muzonzini, Zimbabwe’s Ambassador to Kenya, First Review Conference, Nairobi, 2 December 2004. The period 2004-2009 suggests it is a six-year plan. However, Zimbabwe also refers to the “Implementation Plan 2005-2009.” Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 1.

[13] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 27 March 2005; see also Zimbabwe, “Communicating elements of plans to implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 1.

[14] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005.

[15] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005.

[16] Possibly the same mined area as Malvernia (Sango) to Crooks Corner referred to in Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005.

[17] Email from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 2 September 2005.

[18] Statement by Amb. E. Muzonzini, Zimbabwe’s Ambassador to Kenya, First Review

Conference, Nairobi, 2 December 2004.

[19] Email from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 2 September 2005.

[20] Itai Dzamara “Lack of funds delays demining,” Zimbabwe Independent (Harare), 27 August 2004.

[21] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, pp. 3-4.

[22] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 3; for more information, see also UNMAS, “Joint Assessment Report on Zimbabwe,” 15 February 2000, www.mineaction.org, accessed 14 September 2005; Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 882.

[23] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, pp. 7-9.

[24] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 27 March 2005.

[25] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 7-8.

[26] Email from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 2 September 2005.

[27] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 28 April 2005.

[28] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 28 July 2005.

[29] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 882.

[30] UNMAS, “Joint Assessment Report on Zimbabwe,” 15 February 2000, www.mineaction.org, accessed 14 September 2005.

[31] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005. Previously, Zimbabwe reported that the Kariba power station had been cleared. Article 7 Report 2002, Form C, 13 February 2003.

[32] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 2.

[33] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 27 March 2005.

[34] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 27 March 2005.

[35] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005; Article 7 Report, Form C, 1 December 2003.

[36] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005.

[37] Article 7 Report, Form G, 8 July 2005.

[38] Email from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 2 September 2005.

[39] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005; Article 7 Report, Form C, 1 December 2003.

[40] Interview with Col. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 27 March 2005.

[41] “ZNA Clearing Landmines,” Herald, 9 May 2005.

[42] Article 7 Report, Form C, 8 July 2005

[43] Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004, p. 8.

[44] Article 7 Report, Form I, 8 July 2005.

[45] Interview with Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, Harare, 28 April 2005.

[46] Zimbabwe, “UNDP Support for Strengthening National Capacity for Disaster Management in Zimbabwe,” January 2005-February 2008; see also Zimbabwe, “Communicating Elements of Plans to Implement Article 5,” August 2004.

[47] Email from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 2 September 2005.

[48] Email to Landmine Monitor (HI) from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 19 September 2005.

[49] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 885

[50] Email to Landmine Monitor (HI) from Col. J. Munongwa, ZIMAC, 19 September 2005.

[51] For more information, see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 885.

[52] Article 7 Report, Form J, 8 July 2005.

[53] “Landmine blast kills two Zimbabweans on Taiwanese island,” BBC (Taipei), 25 April 2005.

[54] “Zimbabweans killed in landmine explosion,” Reuters (Harare), 18 July 2005.

[55] Article 7 Report, Form J, 8 July 2005; “Health Action in Crisis”, Zimbabwe Country Profile, WHO, www.who.int/hac/crises/zwe/background/Zimbabwe_Feb05.pdf, accessed 17 August 2005; “Zimbabwe: Hospital in Need of Care,” IRIN, 3 February 2005; for more information, see also Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 885-886.

[56] For more information, see Landmine Monitor Report 2004, pp. 885-886, see also NASCOH website, www.nascoh.org.zw, accessed 18 August 2005.

[57] Article 7 Report, Form J, 8 July 2005.

[58] See Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 886; US Department of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004: Zimbabwe,” Washington DC, 28 February 2005.