+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
Email Notification Receive notifications when this Country Profile is updated.

Sections



Send us your feedback on this profile

Send the Monitor your feedback by filling out this form. Responses will be channeled to editors, but will not be available online. Click if you would like to send an attachment. If you are using webmail, send attachments to .

Philippines

Last Updated: 29 November 2012

Mine Ban Policy

Commitment to the Mine Ban Treaty

Mine Ban Treaty status

State Party

National implementation measures

None

Transparency reporting

14 September 2012

Policy

The Republic of the Philippines signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 1997 and ratified it on 15 February 2000, becoming a State Party on 1 August 2000.

In February 2011, the “Act Providing for a Total Ban on Anti-Personnel Landmines, for Other Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Landmines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices, For The Creation of a Philippine Coordinating Committee on Landmines, and for Related Purposes” was re-filed in Congress as House Bill 04159 by Rep. Walden Bello of the Akbayan Party. The bill has been with the Committee on National Defense and Security since February 2011.[1] The bill was also filed in the Philippine Senate on 5 July 2010 by Gregorio B. Honasan II and by Manny B. Villar Jr. on 12 July 2010 as SBN 1244; it has been pending in committee since August 2010.[2] In September 2012, the Philippines stated in their Article 7 report that it had no updated information on the status of congressional activity on an implementation law.[3]

On 14 September 2012, the Philippines provided its twelfth Article 7 report.[4] Its previous Article 7 report covered calendar year 2010. It has provided eleven previous reports.[5]

The Philippines participated in the Eleventh Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in Phnom Penh in November–December 2011, where it made a statement on cooperation and assistance. The Philippines also became the co-chair of the Standing Committee on Stockpile Destruction in 2011.

The Philippines is a State Party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended Protocol II on landmines. It has not joined Protocol V on explosive remnants of war.

Production, transfer, stockpiling, and use

In September 2012, the Philippines reported that it had destroyed a further 271 Claymore antipersonnel mines discovered during inspections at ammunition depots.[6] The Philippines reports that it has never produced or exported antipersonnel mines. It destroyed its entire stockpile of antipersonnel mines—all Claymore-type mines—in 1998. It has not retained any live mines for training purposes. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has stated that it has never used antipersonnel mines to combat insurgency groups within the country.

Media reports regularly state that authorities have recovered “landmines” during operations against insurgents, almost all of which appear to be command-detonated improvised explosive devices (IEDs).[7] In December 2009, the Philippines told States Parties that all landmines and IEDs recovered from non-state armed groups (NSAGs) are destroyed immediately.[8] In September 2012, the Philippines reported that it had recovered and destroyed 63 improvised antipersonnel mines during operations.[9]

Non-state armed groups

In the past, at least four NSAGs have used antipersonnel mines or victim-activated IEDs: the New People’s Army (NPA), the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG). Five NSAGs, including the MILF, have formally pledged in writing not to use antipersonnel mines.[10] The government of the Philippines has engaged in ongoing peace talks with both the NPA and MILF during 2011 and the first half of 2012.

The Monitor could not identify any specific instances of use of antipersonnel mines (victim-activated explosive devices or booby-traps) by NSAGs during 2011. However, in January 2012 one child was killed and another injured in what media reports portrayed as a victim-activated explosion on the island of Sulu.[11] In February 2012, another civilian died while hunting after reportedly stepping on an explosive device in Zamboangadel Norte.[12]

In its previous Article 7 report covering 2009, the Philippines reported that the AFP investigated “various instances of use of Anti-Personnel Mines by Armed Non-State Actors” in 2009, but the report does not comment on any findings.[13]

The NPA continued to use command-detonated IEDs in 2011 and 2012, which continue to be referred to as “landmines” by Philippine authorities and the media. The NPA (the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines, CPP) signed a Comprehensive Agreement to Respect Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) with the Philippine government in 1998.[14] The CARHRIHL commits both parties to protect the civilian population by not violating the “right not to be subjected to...the use of landmines,” but does not define “landmine.”

Government and AFP officials accuse the NPA of violating CARHRIHL by using command-detonated mines.[15] The NPA has previously asserted that it manufactures and uses only command-detonated weapons allowed under the Mine Ban Treaty and, in its view, the CARHRIHL.[16] In some cases, attacks with these weapons have killed or injured civilians.[17] In June 2012, the government raised the issue of landmine use during informal talks with the NPA/National Democratic Front in Oslo, specifying that in its view such use was a violation of the CARHRIHL.[18]

The Philippine Government and the CPP-NPA agreed to two ceasefires, one for 19 days in December 2010[19] and another for seven days in February 2011, in support of formal peace talks in Oslo.[20] A government official was reported to say that landmine use by the NPA would be on the agenda for the Oslo meeting.[21] The Philippine Campaign to Ban Landmines (PCBL) welcomed the government plan to take up the contentious issue on the use of landmines when its peace panel would meet with them in Oslo.[22]

IEDs as well as the components and explosives for their manufacture, such as detonating cord and wire, Claymore canisters, gins of super dyne explosive bombs, and blasting caps, were all recovered from 1 June 2010 to 21 February 2011 in Kalinga, Laguna, Rizal, Batangas, Aurora, Quezon, Oriental Mindoro, Camarines Norte, Camarines Sur, Masbate Luzon, Samar, Eastern Samar, Capiz, Iloilo in the Visayas, Davao City, Davao Oriental, Surigao del Sur, Agusan del Sur, Bukidnon, Compostela Valley, and Misamis Occidental.[23] These IEDs and their components have been attributed to the NPA. The AFP also reported the recovery of components for explosives from the MNLF in Sulu in May 2010.[24] Other incidents involving IEDs were attributed to political rivalry and extortionists.

In September 2012, it was reported that the MILF placed an order within their code of conduct to start actively fulfilling the obligations to ban possession, use or production of antipersonnel mines or victim-activated explosive devices. Also in September 2012, Geneva Call held a workshop on the Deed of Commitment at the Training Center of the Bangsamoro Leadership and Management Institute.[25]

The government of the Philippines and the MILF signed guidelines to allow the PCBL and Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD) to engage in clearance to support community rehabilitation in conflict areas in Mindanao in May 2010.[26] In 2011 and early 2012, the PCBL provided briefings regarding clearance to the entities involved in the peace process in Mindanao.[27]

Geneva Call has also conducted trainings to clarify the scope of the Deed of Commitment for members of the Revolutionary Workers Party of Mindanao/Revolutionary Peoples’ Army and for two factions of the Revolutionary Workers Party of the Philippines/Revolutionary Proletarian Army-Alex Boncayo Brigade.[28]

 



[1] Committee Information, 15th Congress, http://www.congress.gov.ph/committees/search.php?congress=15&s=bills&id=0525. Bill 04159 is an act providing for a total ban on anti-personnel landmines, for other prohibitions or restrictions on the use of landmines, booby-traps and other devices, for the creation of a Philippine coordinating committee on landmines, and for related purposes. In May 2009 the government told other States Parties that it hoped the law would pass before national elections in May 2010. However the bill which received its first hearing in March 2009 remained at the Technical Working Group level as did previous bills, since 2000, because of other priorities. See Landmine Monitor Report 2010, and Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 621. The bill would comprehensively prohibit victim-activated antipersonnel mines and implement both the Mine Ban Treaty and Convention on Conventional Weapons Amended Protocol II.

[2] Philippine Comprehensive Law on Landmines, http://www.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=15&q=SBN-1244. Previous bills were SBN 1936 and SBN 1595, filed by the same senators on 17 September and 3 December 2007, respectively.

[3] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form A, 14 September 2012, http://bit.ly/QwQ7my.

[4] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, 14 September 2012, covering the period of 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012, http://bit.ly/QwQ7my.

[5] Previous reports were submitted: for the calendar year 2010, 16 April 2010, for the year 2009 and 2008, there was no report covering the year 2007, and on 31 March 2007, 3 November 2006, 9 May 2005, 15 February 2004, 14 May 2003, 5 April 2002, 12 September 2001, and 12 September 2000.

[6] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form G, 14 September 2012, http://bit.ly/QwQ7my. This included 207 M18A1 and 64 A18A2 Claymore antipersonnel mines.

[7] See, for example, Zaff Solmerin, “Troops overrun NPA land-mine factory,” Business Mirror, 12 March 2012, http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/; “Philippine troops seize NPA weapons factory,” Mindanao Examiner, 1 April 2011, www.mindanaoexaminer.com.

[8] Statement by Erlinda F. Basilio, Special Envoy of the President of the Republic of the Philippines, Mine Ban Treaty Second Review Conference, Cartagena, 3–4 December 2009.

[9] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form G, 14 September 2012, http://bit.ly/QwQ7my.

[10] The MILF, the Rebolusyonaryong Partidong Manggagawa-Mindanao/Revolutionary People’s Army (RPMM/RPA), the Rebolusyonaryong Partidong Manggagawa-Pilipinas/Revolutionary People’s Army (RPMP/RPA) faction of Nilo de la Cruz, and the Marxista-Leninistang Partidong Pilipinas/Rebolusyonaryong Hukbong Bayan (MLPP/RHB) signed the Rebel Group Declaration of Adherence to International Humanitarian Law on Landmines of the Philippine Campaign to Ban Landmines. The MILF, the Revolutionary Workers Party of the Philippines/Revolutionary Proletarian Army-Alex Boncayao Brigade and the Revolutionary Workers Party of Mindanao/Revolutionary People’s Army signed the Deed of Commitment under Geneva Call for Adherence to a Total Ban on Anti-Personnel Mines and for Cooperation in Mine Action.

[11] Rene Acosta, “Land-mine explosion in Sulu kills boy, wounds friend,” Business Mirror, 5 January 2012, http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/.

[12] Franklin P. Gomapon, “Landmine explodes in Labason town,” Philippine Information Agency, 22 February 2012, http://bit.ly/QBzr07.

[13] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report, Form I, 16 April 2010.

[14] CARHRIHL, Part III: Respect for Human Rights, Article 2(15), 16 March 1998, www.hdcentre.org. The government considers use of command-detonated devices as well as any type of landmine as banned by CARHRIHL, while the NPA considers only use of victim-activated devices banned.

[15] See for example, Rudolf Ian G. Alama, “Army denounces use of landmines,” Philippine Information Agency, 7 August 2012, http://bit.ly/MMctPP; and “Military deplores rebel attack,” Sun Star, 23 July 2011, www.sunstar.com.ph.

[17] See, for example, Andreo Calonzo, “Bystander killed in Surigaodel Sur blast,” GMA News, 19 December 2011, http://bit.ly/sdGNE2, and “Landmine kills 2 soldiers, farmer in Philippines,” The Star, 5 March 2012, http://bit.ly/QIIVZw.

[18] Office of the Presidential Advisor on the Peace Process, “GPH, NDF meet for informal talks, agree to continue discussions,” Updates on CPP-NPA-NDF Peace Table, 17 June 2012, http://bit.ly/KSAFxi.

[19] See, for example, Christine O. Avendaño and Cynthia Balana, “Season of joy starts with gov’t-NPA truce,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 17 December 2010, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20101217-309417/Season-of-joy-starts-with-govt-NPA-truce, Frinston Lim, “Women grieve over land mine deaths,” Inquirer Mindanao, 26 February 2011, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/regions/view/20110226-322397/Women-grieve-over-land-mine-deaths; and Maj. Gen. Emmanuel T. Bautista, “Landmine Incidents, 01 April 2010 to 21 February 2011,” AFP, Manila, 28 February 2011. In this hard copy report from the AFP, two soldiers were reported as wounded in action, one civilian was killed, and four civilians were injured.

[20] “CPP, AFP declare ceasefire,” Pilipino Express, 27 February 2011, www.mb.com.ph; and Dona Pazzibugan, “AFP, NPA agree to truce during talks,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 15 February 2011, http://www.inquirer.net/.

[21] Ben Call, “Gov’t to raise landmine issue in peace talks with Reds,” Manila Bulletin, 2 January 2011, www.mb.com.ph; and Joyce Panares, “Govt, Reds explore peace prospects,” Manila Standard Today, 14 January 2011, http://www.manilastandardtoday.com.

[22] Delfin Mallari Jr., “Group welcomes inclusion of ‘landmine issue’ in peace talks,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2 January 2011, www.allvoices.com.

[23] See “Philippine troops seize NPA weapons factory,” Mindanao Examiner, 1 April 2011, www.mindanaoexaminer.com; and Maj. Gen. Emmanuel T. Bautista, “Landmine Incidents, 01 April 2010 to 21 February 2011,” AFP, Manila, 28 February 2011.

[24] Maj. Gen. Emmanuel T. Bautista, “Landmine Incidents, 01 April 2010 to 21 February 2011,” AFP, Manila, 28 February 2011.

[25] “Geneva Call, MILF conduct Training of Trainers for Deed of Commitment,” LURAWAN, 2 September 2012, http://bit.ly/RipyED; MILF General Order No. 3 “prohibits all BIAF officers and members to own, possess, keep, use, manufacture, stockpile, utilize, Victim-Activated Anti-Personnel (AP) Mines and other victim-activated explosives anywhere and at all time.” This training is follow up to an MILF agreement to incorporate the ban on antipersonnel mines into its internal rules following a March 2010, Geneva Call issued report on allegations of antipersonnel mine use by the MILF. According to the report, “The mission team found that AP [antipersonnel] mines had indeed been used, but was not able to identify the perpetrators; however it was considered that MILF forces may have been involved in some of these incidents.” See Landmine Monitor Report 2010 and Landmine Monitor Report 2011.

[26] Jose Rodel Clapano, “Government, MILF agree to destroy landmines,” Philstar.com, 19 May 2010, www.philstar.com; Gabriel Mabutas, “Gov’t-MILF pact to remove landmines hailed,” ç, 12 May 2010, http://www.mb.com.ph; and “Philippine rebels agree to remove landmines in south,” Reuters, 23 April 2010, http://www.reuters.com.

[27] PCBL, supported by the Asia Foundation, provided briefings and an update on the mine clearance project to the International Monitoring Team (IMT), Government of the Republic of the Philippines and MILF Coordinating Committee on the Cessation of Hostilities, the MILF Peace Panel Members and Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process and staff and officers of the AFP Munitions Center. Email from Doods Santos, 6 May 2012.

[28] Email from Katherine Kramer, Program Director, Asia, Coordinator on Landmines and Other Explosive Devices, Geneva Call, 15 April 2011. Also in Geneva Call, “Annual Report 2010,” p. 21. No dates or locations of the trainings were provided.