+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
Email Notification Receive notifications when this Country Profile is updated.

Sections



Send us your feedback on this profile

Send the Monitor your feedback by filling out this form. Responses will be channeled to editors, but will not be available online. Click if you would like to send an attachment. If you are using webmail, send attachments to .

Poland

Last Updated: 31 July 2012

Cluster Munition Ban Policy

The Republic of Poland has not acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

In April 2012, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed the Monitor that Poland’s position on accession to the Convention on Cluster Munitions remaind unchanged.[1]Poland has repeatedly stated that it is not in a position to join the convention due to “security needs” and because it is not prepared to accept the convention’s “far-going prohibitions.”[2]Poland has said that it considers cluster munitions equipped with self-destruct mechanisms and with a failure rate no higher than 3% to be “legitimate weapons of significant military value.”[3]

Poland has consistently expressed its preference for cluster munitions to be addressed within the framework of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW).In April 2012, Poland informed the Monitor that it has not initiated a process to review its position on the Convention on Cluster Munitions following the November 2011 failure by the CCW to adopt a protocol on cluster munitions.[4]

In April 2012, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed the Monitor that Poland’s position with regard to enacting a national moratorium on the use, production, or transfer of cluster munitions “has not been changed.”[5]Previously, in 2010, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that Poland is not in a position to undertake a moratorium on the use, production, acquisition, or transfer of cluster munitions, but repeated that Poland attaches “the utmost importance to the humanitarian aspects of the use of cluster munitions and supports measures designed to reduce civilian losses and suffering.”[6]

Poland participated in the Oslo Process that led to the creation of the convention, but made it clear from the start that it did not support a comprehensive prohibition on cluster munitions and preferred to address the issue within the framework of the CCW.[7] Poland attended both the negotiations of the convention in Dublin in May 2008 and the Convention on Cluster Munitions Signing Conference in Oslo in December 2008 as an observer.[8]

Poland attended the Second Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Beirut, Lebanon in September 2011 as an observer, but did not make any statements. It did not participate inthe convention’s intersessional meetings in Geneva in April 2012.

Poland is a signatory to the Mine Ban Treaty and has indicated that it will ratify in 2012.[9]

Convention on Conventional Weapons

Poland is a party to the CCW andit has actively engaged in theCCW work on cluster munitions. At the Fourth Review Conference in November 2011, Poland was one of a small group of countries that strongly supported the conclusion of a draft protocol on cluster munitions. The Review Conference ended without reaching agreement on the draft protocol, thus concluding the CCW’s work on cluster munitions. Poland has called the CCW’s failure to reach consensus on the text “sad news for international security policy.”[10]

Use

Poland has consistently stated that the Polish Armed Forces have never used cluster munitions in combat situations.[11]

In June 2011, Poland confirmed that, as in previous years, cluster munitions were used for training purposes in 2010 and 2011 on training grounds by its land forces as well as the air force.[12]

Stockpiling

Poland acknowledges possessing both air-dropped and surface-launched cluster munitions.[13] Polish Land Forces are equipped with the following types:

·         122mm M-21FK “FENIKS-Z” rockets, containing 42 GKO submunitions, used by BM-21/21M or RM-70/85 multi-barrel rocket launchers.

·         122mm “HESYT-1” artillery projectiles, containing 20 GKO submunitions, used by 2S1 “GOŹDZIK” self-propelled howitzers.

·         98mm “RAD-2” mortar projectiles, containing 12 GKO submunitions, used by M-98 mortars.

The Polish Air Force possesses the following types of cluster munitions:

·         ZK-300 cluster bomb, containing 315 LBOk fragmentation bomblets; both the carrier and bomblets were designed and produced in Poland.

·         BKF expendable unit loader with antitank, incendiary and fragmentation bomblets, imported from the former Soviet Union, for use in KMG-U dispensers on Su-22 aircraft.

·         According to information provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in previous years, the GKO submunitions are typical dual purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) that combine an antipersonnel fragmentation with an anti-armor shaped charge. Poland claims that they are an entirely Polish design and are “relatively new and modern” (produced since 2001), incorporating a back-up self-destruction mechanism, which it claims ensures “negligible failure rates of the submunitions in all environmental conditions.”[14]

Poland has stated that its air-delivered cluster munitions which entered into service in the 1980s during the Warsaw Pact Era are “obsolete” and stressed that “the current military Air Force doctrine does not anticipate any use of air-delivered cluster munitions in military operations.” However, Poland acknowledged that the Polish Air Force used cluster munitions in 2009 for training crews of Su-22M4 aircraftin 2010. It confirmed that the Polish Armed Forces are equipped with cluster munitions for the Su-22M4 aircraft and stated, “If this ammunition is not fully used in training purposes, after the exhaustion of services life, they will be subject to disposal and destruction.”[15]

In 2010, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the Armed Forces no longer possessed RBK-250, RBK-275, and RBK-500 type cluster bombs,in view of their age the bombs were withdrawn from use during the 1990s and destroyed.[16]

In October 2010, the Minister of Defense informed Parliament that “the ministry is considering equipping the Polish Armed Forces with precision strike munitions (intelligent munitions), in case a complete ban on cluster munition use is introduced.”[17]

Production

Several Polish companies produce cluster munitions. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the types of cluster munitions it lists as being in the Polish arsenal “are produced by the Polish companies exclusively for the needs of the Polish Armed Forces.”[18] The ministry confirmed in 2010 that cluster munitions “are still produced by the Polish companies” for its armed forces.[19]

The Polish company ZakładyMetalowe “Dezamet” S.A. has produced the ZK-300 Kisajno cluster bomb and also lists producing another type of cluster bomb called the LBKas-250, which contains 120 LBok-1 bomblets.[20]ZakładyMetalowe “Dezamet” S.A. also produces a 98mm mortar cluster munition, as well as a 122mm projectile designed for the 2S1 “GOŹDZIK” howitzer.[21] The Kraśnik defense plant has produced cluster munitions for 98mm mortars, 122mm artillery, and 152mm artillery.[22] The Polish company TłoczniaMetaliPresstaSpółkaAkcynjna has manufactured 122mm rockets.[23]FabrykaProdukcjiSpecjalnej Sp. z o.o. produces the 122mm M-21FK “FENIKS-Z” and the 122mm “HESYT” rockets.[24] The latter company also produces GKO submunitions.[25] Many are subsidiaries of the Bumar Group, a majority government-owned defense industry consortium of 23 defense sector companies specializing in munitions, rockets, and other weaponry technology.[26]In 2005, regarding future procurement of cluster munitions, Poland stated, “The Ministry of Defense requires during acceptance tests less than 2.5% failure rate for the purchased submunitions.”[27]

Transfer

According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Poland and or Polish companies have not exported any cluster munitions in the period from 2009 through 2011, or in previous years.[28]In 2010 however, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed the Monitor that Polish companies could, theoretically, be legally granted permission to export cluster munitions, if an application was requested.[29]The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated in 2010 that Poland was not prepared to introduce a moratorium on the use, production, or transfer of cluster munitions.[30]



[1] Email fromGrzegorzCyganowski, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 26 April 2012.

[2]Letter from Tomasz Łękarski, Deputy Director, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 June 2011 and letter from Adam Kobieracki, Director, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009. See also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 226.

[3] Letter from Kobieracki, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009. See also Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), p. 226.

[4] Email fromCyganowski, Security Policy Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 26 April 2012.

[5]Ibid.

[6]Letter from MarekSczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010.

[7]Poland was one of three states present at the initial conference launching the process in February 2007 that did not endorse the Oslo Declaration, in which states pledged to negotiate a legally-binding instrument by the end of 2008 prohibiting cluster munitions that cause unacceptable humanitarian harm.

[8]For details on Poland’s cluster munition policy and practice through early 2009, see Human Rights Watch and Landmine Action, Banning Cluster Munitions: Government Policy and Practice (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, May 2009), pp. 226–227.

[9]ICBL, Landmine Monitor Report 2009: Toward a Mine-Free World (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2009), p. 865.

[10] Statement of Poland, CCW Fourth Review Conference, Geneva, 25 November 2011. Notes by AOAV.

[11]It claimed that there was not a single unexploded submunition found during tests of new GKO artillery submunitions. Unexploded remnants were found during tests of old-generation cluster bombs for the SU-22M4 aircraft. Letter from Łękarski, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 June 2011; letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010; and letter from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009.In 2010, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmedthat the Polish Military Contingent in Afghanistan have been equipped with cluster munitions for 98mm mortars, but also stated that NATO’s International Security Assistance Force policy not to use cluster munitions in Afghanistan “has been put into effect through the order of the Chief of General Staff” of the Polish Armed Forces. Letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010; andICBL, Cluster Munition Monitor 2010 (Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, October 2010), pp. 235–236.

[12] Letter from Łękarski, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 June 2011; and from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 8 April 2010.

[13]All information on current stockpiles provided by letter from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009.

[14]Ibid.

[15]Ibid., 8 April 2010.

[16] Letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010.

[17]Response by BodganKlich, Minister of Defense, to Parliamentary question no. 18071 on cluster munitions, submitted by Joseph Rojek, MP, SPS-023-18071/10, 26 October 2010,http://orka2.sejm.gov.pl.

[18] Letter from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009.

[19]Letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010.

[20] Robert Hewson, ed., Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons, Issue 44 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2004), p. 391; and Dezamet, “Air Armament,” undated, www.dezamet.com.pl.

[21]ZakładyMetalowe DEZAMET S.A. website, www.dezamet.com.pl.

[22]Dezamet, “Cargo Ammunition,” www.dezamet.com.pl; and MarcinGórka, “Poland Sees Nothing Wrong in Cluster Bombs,” GazetaWyborcza, 9 September 2008, www.wyborcza.pl.

[23]Terry J. Gander and Charles Q. Cutshaw, eds., Jane’s Ammunition Handbook 20012002 (Surrey, UK: Jane’s Information Group Limited, 2001), p. 626.

[24]FabrykaProdukcjiSpecjalnej Sp. z o.o. website, www.fps.com.pl.

[25] Ibid.

[26]Bumar website, www.bumar.com.

[27] Communicationfrom the Polish Ministry of Defense, to Pax Christi Netherlands, 14 February 2005. The information was provided with the proviso that the “content of the paper does not necessarily reflect the official position of Poland.”

[28]Letter from Łękarski, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 June 2011; letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010; and letter from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 10 March 2009.

[29] Letter from Kobieracki, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 8 April 2010. The response stated: “Currently regulations on control of trade in goods of strategic importance do not provide for a total ban on exports of cluster munitions, as opposed to anti-personnel mines falling within CN code 9306 90 10 Combined Nomenclature, whose export from the territory of the Republic of Poland shall be prohibited (with limited exceptions) under the Regulations Ministers of 20 October 2009 amending Regulation on the introduction of bans and restrictions on goods of strategic importance for national security (Journal of Acts 2009, No. 183, pos. 1427). Administrative decisions on the granting of permits to export weapons are considered on an individual basis with the involvement of consulting authorities, in accordance with the provisions of the Act of29 November 2000 on foreign trade in goods, technologies and services of strategic importance for national security and for the maintenance of international peace and security (Journal of Laws of 2004 No. 229, item. 2315, as amended later). Obtaining permission for export of cluster munitions is theoretically possible, in the case of approval of the transaction by the trade control authority, after having received a positive opinion of consulting bodies, including the Foreign Ministry.” Translation by Marta Kulikowska, Polish Red Cross, 30 May 2010.

[30] Letter from Sczygieł, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 16 July 2010.