+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
Email Notification Receive notifications when this Country Profile is updated.


Send us your feedback on this profile

Send the Monitor your feedback by filling out this form. Responses will be channeled to editors, but will not be available online. Click if you would like to send an attachment. If you are using webmail, send attachments to .


Last Updated: 02 December 2014

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Action points based on findings

·         Make adequate prosthetic and rehabilitation facilities a priority in the mine-affected regions.

·         Begin coordination of victim assistance obligations with the input of the General Directorate of Services for the Disabled and Elderly in the Ministry of Family and Social Policies.

·         There is a need for planning and coordination of victim assistance in accordance with Mine Ban Treaty Maputo Action Plan commitments.

Victim assistance commitments

Turkey is responsible for landmine and explosive remnants of war (ERW) survivors. Turkey has made a commitment to victim assistance through the Mine Ban Treaty.

Casualties Overview

All known casualties

6,360 (1,269 killed; 5,091 injured) in the period 1984 to 2010

Casualties in 2013

23 (2012: 69)

2013 casualties by outcome

8 killed; 15 injured (2012: 24 killed; 45 injured)

2013 casualties by device type

16 mine; 6 ERW; 1 unknown explosive devices

Monitor analysis of media reports collected by the Initiative for a Mine-Free Turkey (IMFT) identified at least 23 new casualties in 2012 due to mines (possibly including victim-activated improvised explosive devices, IEDs) and also due to ERW in Turkey. Of the total, 22 were civilians; half of civilian casualties were children (11: six boys and the others of unknown sex). One recorded casualty was security personnel.[1] The 2013 total represented a significant decrease from the 69 new casualties identified in Turkey from IMFT reporting in 2012.[2]

Included in the total for 2013 were six mine casualties from Syria (two killed and four injured) in incidents in the Turkish border minefields while crossing from Syria to Turkey. Eight casualties among people fleeing from Syria to Turkey were recorded in 2012.

As of November 2014, at least nine casualties were reported in the border minefields, making up almost half of the total casualties recorded in the first 11 months of the year (19). As in 2013, all were reported to be civilians, with three civilians killed and another six injured by landmines at the Turkish-Syrian border while escaping from the conflict in Syria. At least four of the Syrian casualties in 2014 were children.[3]

Initial emergency medical care for the injured who survive is provided in the Suruç Public Hospital. Depending on their medical needs, they may also be transferred to the Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Training and Research Hospital. The exact number of people killed and injured by landmines on the border minefields was not known due to a lack of accurate reporting. According to one of the doctors in the Suruç Public Hospital’s Department of General Surgery, “The mine incidents are reported in the hospital records as ‘wound due to firearms’…Still, I can say that the number of incidents and victims is much greater than the numbers mentioned in the press.”[4] One media article in October 2014 reported that more than 10 people had been recently injured crossing the border minefields in Turkey.[5]

The government of Turkey reported that there were eight casualties (two killed; six injured) in 2013.[6] This represented a significant decrease from the 82 mine casualties Turkey reported for 2012.[7] These casualties are believed to be military personnel. No specific details on civilian status, sex, or age were provided in the reporting.

In its Article 5 deadline Extension Request of March 2013, Turkey provided information on antipersonnel mine casualties occurring between 2004 and the end of 2012: 882 military personnel (260 killed; 622 injured) and 168 civilians (56 killed; 112 injured). Turkey also included disaggregated information on the age and sex of civilian casualties for a similar time period (10 years); of the total civilian casualties reported, 15 were female and 50 were children.[8] In contrast, Monitor reporting, which included IMFT data for the period from 2004 to the end of 2012, counted more than twice the number of civilian mine/ERW casualties; 377 civilian casualties of 979 casualties recorded in total.

The total number of mine/IED and ERW casualties in Turkey is unknown. Turkey had reported 4,271 mine/ERW casualties, including 871 people killed and 3,400 injured, as of the end of 2012.[9] However, according to a media report in April 2010, the Ministry of Internal Affairs had recorded 6,360 mine casualties since 1984; 1,269 people were killed (625 security personnel; 644 civilians) and another 5,091 people were injured (with the number of civilians compared to security personnel injured not reported) in mine incidents.[10] In 2007, a demining specialist reported at least 10,000 mine casualties (mostly civilians) along the Turkish-Syrian border since the 1950s (more than 3,000 killed and 7,000 injured).[11]

Victim Assistance

More than 5,000 people were reported to have been injured by mines in Turkey since 1984.[12]

Victim assistance in 2013

No significant changes in the accessibility or quality of services were reported for 2013. Mine/ERW survivors and persons with disabilities in affected areas did not have access to the same level of services as other persons with disabilities in larger cities in Turkey.[13]

Assessing victim assistance needs

No efforts to assess the needs of mine/ERW survivors in Turkey were reported in 2013. There was no system in place to collect data on mine survivors or their needs. The IMFT collected the most comprehensive information available through media scanning and crosschecking with other organizations and local sources.

The European Commission (EC) continued to report that a lack of broader data and research on persons with disabilities remained a barrier to informed policymaking in Turkey.[14]

The Diyarbakir Lawyer’s Bar Association and the Human Rights Association collected information on mine/ERW casualties in the affected regions; information collected included details on the needs of the survivors and families.[15]

In 2006, Turkey had reported that it was initiating a program of transition to an international injury classification system that would include mines and ERW.[16] No further progress on this transition was reported as of end 2013.

Victim assistance coordination

Government coordinating body/focal point

Disabled and Senior Citizens Directorate General, Ministry of Family and Social Policies

Coordinating mechanism(s)




The Ministry of Family and Social Policies through its Disabled and Senior Citizens Directorate General is the government entity responsible for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities.[17] Turkey has never had government victim assistance coordination.

A delegation of the ICBL and IMFT discussed victim assistance with a Deputy Undersecretary of the Ministry of Family and Social Policy in March 2013, underlining Turkey’s victim assistance commitments, the links with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and the related responsibilities of the ministry. The Deputy Undersecretary agreed that the role of victim assistance focal point fitted with the work of the ministry’s department of persons with disabilities and also the social welfare department, which is responsible for pensions and other payments.[18]

Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 reporting on victim assistance is updated annually by Turkey but only covers treatment received by survivors at military medical facilities. Article 7 (and Convention on Conventional Weapons Article 13) reporting did not include information on services available to civilian mine/ERW survivors at civilian facilities, or on survivors injured in previous years.[19] Turkey did not make statements on victim assistance at the Thirteenth Meeting of States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty in 2013 or at the Mine Ban Treaty Third Review Conference in Maputo.

Survivor inclusion and participation

Survivors reported that they were not included in the planning or implementation of services relevant to their needs.[20] The Disabled and Senior Citizens Directorate General had not engaged survivors and was not familiar with the issue of victim assistance or specific needs in mine affected areas.[21]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities[22]

Name of organization

Type of organization

Type of activity

Dicle University Research Hospital, Diyarbakir


Orthopedics and traumatology center and the prosthetic center provided civilian survivors with prostheses free of charge

Gulhane Military Medical Academy and the Turkish Armed Forces Rehabilitation and Care Center (TAF-RCC)


Specialized facilities assist people wounded by weapons with high-quality services: rehabilitation, economic and social inclusion, and psychological support

IMFT/Turkish mine/ERW Survivor Network


Advocacy and assistance to individual survivors and peer support

Emergency and ongoing medical care

A study of examples of surgical intervention after mine injures of varying severities by the Medical Association Diyarbakir emphasized the time-sensitivity of emergency medical care; the study emphasized that longer intervals between injury and surgery corresponded to more severe levels of amputation. Among the study group, the average time to receive first medical care was nine hours; 13 of 186 survivors recorded in the study died due to infection.[23]

All persons with disabilities have the right to access the free first-aid services at public and private healthcare centers. Those without social insurance can apply for a special “green card” to be eligible for services. However, in practice those persons with disabilities eligible for the green card medical insurance still contributed to part of their medical expenses, eliminating the availability of free services.[24] Regulations in the Healthcare Application Notice, issued by the Social Security Organization of Turkey, restricted access to medicines, equipment, and mobility devices for persons with disabilities, even when deemed necessary by medical professionals.[25]

Healthcare facilities in towns in the mine-affected region (other than the largest cities) are underfunded, have inadequate staff levels and equipment, and often were not able to address survivors’ emergencies or ongoing medical needs.[26]

Physical rehabilitation, including prosthetics

There was a significant need for prosthetics and rehabilitation services to be established in other mine/ERW-affected provinces. There was also a need to establish facilities that could address the needs of child survivors. Holders of the green card could only apply for new prostheses every five years. This was detrimental to the rehabilitation of child mine/ERW survivors who require frequent replacements while growing.[27]

The Dicle University Research Hospital prosthetics center was the only such center for all mine-affected regions. By early 2013, it was still open but had effectively ceased to operate; this eliminated the only free option for prosthetics for civilian mine/ERW survivors. Use of the facility declined in 2008 when it began to provide services only to those having the state-provided green cards for the disadvantaged. In addition, the lack of assistance for transportation or accommodation expenses for survivors coming to the center from distant provinces limited access.[28]

In the absence of a free rehabilitation center, in order obtain prostheses mine/ERW survivors and other persons with disabilities face complicated procedures to apply for poor quality prosthetics available through the national health system. Even this assistance is out of reach to many mine/ERW survivors due to the geographical distance and their poverty levels.[29]

Laws and policies

Civilian survivors could apply for compensation through Law 5233, the Law on the Compensation of Damages that Occurred due to Terror and the Fight Against Terrorism. The Diyarbakir Lawyers’ Bar Association continued to help mine/ERW survivors access benefits to which they were entitled, such as compensation under Law 5233, and to promote victim assistance. Survivors have called for a review of the compensation process to ensure timely and appropriate outcomes.[30]

A need for specific policies to address the social support needs of child mine/ERW survivors was identified in 2009.[31] No progress was reported by the end of 2013. Children with disabilities faced difficulties in accessing affordable and inclusive education services. The monitoring, evaluation, and inspection of private special education and rehabilitation services required particular attention.[32]

The constitution permits positive discrimination for persons with disabilities, although the principle is not adequately reflected in policy measures. Legislation prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities in access to healthcare, employment, education, transportation, and in the provision of state services; however, the law was not enforced effectively.[33] People with disabilities continued to face serious difficulties in accessing employment in the private sector, though there is a limited upward trend in the public sector. Turkey lacked a comprehensive strategy to fund commitments to create physical accessibility. Physical barriers to public buildings and all relevant facilities still existed. Deadlines for public institutions’ mandatory compliance to provide accessible services were extended or postponed. [34] In 2013, Diyarbakir, the largest city in the mine-affected regions, became increasingly physically accessible due to the work of local disabled persons organizations and the local government.[35]

Turkey ratified the CRPD on 28 September 2009.[36] However, in 2012 Turkey had not yet established a national mechanism for monitoring implementation of the CRPD and its optional protocol.[37]


[1] Email from Muteber Öğreten, Coordinator, IMFT, 4 May 2014.

[2] Email from Muteber Öğreten, IMFT, 28 March 2013.

[3] Casualty data from media scanning for January to September 2014. Sent by email from Muteber Öğreten, IMFT, 25 November 2014.

[4] Interview with Reşit Doğru, Chairperson of Suruç Branch of the Trade Union for Public Employees in the Health Sector, Suruç, 18 November 2014.

[5]Las minas se pusieron para aislar a los kurdos” (“The mines were placed to isolate the Kurds”), El Mundo, 2 October 2014.

[6] These casualties were reported as “Casulities [sic] by Explosion of APMs [antipersonnel mines] Laid by PKK/Kongra Gel Terrorist Organization,” and lacked information on the means of activation and other details. Data is therefore considered to be insufficient to determine if it fits within the Monitor casualty definition and thus has not been included in 2013 casualty totals. Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2013), Form J.

[9] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Reports (for calendar years 2006–2011), Form J; response to Monitor questionnaire by the Permanent Mission of Turkey to the UN in Geneva, 31 August 2005; and presentation of Turkey, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 13 May 2003.

[10] Melik Duvaklı, “Türkiye, 26 yılda 1.269 canını mayına kurban verdi” (“Turkey, in 26 years 1,269 lives victimized by mines”), Zaman, 13 April 2010.

[11] Email from Ali M. Koknar, President, AMK Risk Management, 5 July 2007; and Ali M. Koknar, AMK Risk Management, “Turkey Moves Forward to Demine Upper Mesopotamia,” Journal of Mine Action, No. 8, 2 November 2004.

[12] Melik Duvaklı, “Türkiye, 26 yılda 1.269 canını mayına kurban verdi” (“Turkey, in 26 years 1,269 lives victimized by mines”), Zaman, 13 April 2010.

[13] Presentation by Ramazan Serin, Local Agenda 21, Disability Department, Diyarbakır, 2 March 2013.

[14] EC, “Turkey 2012 Progress Report,” Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, 10 October 2012, p. 73.

[15] Interview with Mehmed Emin Aktar, Head, Diyarbakır Bar Association, Diyarbakır, 25 April 2011; and interview with M. Raci Bilici, Secretary, Human Rights Association, Diyarbakır Branch, Diyarbakır, 24 April 2011.

[16] Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2006), Form J, 23 April 2007. This referred to the system: “International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10.”

[17] United States (US) Department of State, “2013 Human Rights Report: Turkey,” Washington, DC, 27 February 2014.

[18] Interview with Gazi Alatas, Ministry of Family and Social Policy, 4 March 2013.

[20] Monitor notes from Workshop of the Turkish Mine/ERW Victims’ Network, Diyarbakır, 23 April 2011.

[21] Interview with Gazi Alatas, Ministry of Family and Social Policy, 4 March 2013.

[22] Interviews with Ramazan Serin, Local Agenda 21, Diyarbakır, 24 April 2011, and 3 March 2013; and Mine Ban Treaty Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2011), Form J.

[23] Cengiz Gülay, Medical Association Diyarbakir, “A Study of Traumatic Injuries to Mine Victims,” Presentation, Diyarbakır, 2 March 2013.

[24] Email from Ergün Işeri, then-General Director, Disabled People’s Foundation, 26 March 2009.

[25] Email from Ergün Işeri, General Manager, Association of Persons with Disabilities of Turkey, 16 May 2011.

[26] Interview with Ayse Gokkan, Mayor of Nusaiybin, Nusaiybin, 25 April 2011; and interview with Omer Ay, Turkish Victims’ Network, Nusaiybin, 25 April 2011.

[27] Interview with Ramazan Serin, Local Agenda 21, Diyarbakır, 3 March 2013.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Notes during Monitor Mission, Diyarbakır, 2 March 2013.

[31] Presentation by Dr. Muhammet Can, University of Yuzuncu Yil, Turkey’s First Review Conference, Diyarbakır, 18 October 2009.

[32] EC, “Turkey 2013 Progress Report,” (extract from the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2013–2014”) COM(2013)700 final, p. 58.

[33] US Department of State, “2013 Human Rights Report: Turkey,” Washington, DC, 27 April 2014; and EC, “Turkey 2012 Progress Report,” Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, 10 October 2012, pp. 28–29.

[34] EC, “Turkey 2013 Progress Report,” (extract from the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2013–2014”) COM(2013)700 final, p. 58; and EC, “Turkey 2012 Progress Report,” Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, 10 October 2012, pp. 28–29.

[35] Ethem Cagir, “Diyarbakir works to be friendly to the disabled,” SET Times, 5 June 2013.

[36] Ratification of the CRPD was approved by the Turkish Parliament on 3 December 2008.

[37] EC, “Turkey 2012 Progress Report,” Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, 10 October 2012, pp. 28–29.