+   *    +     +     
About Us 
The Issues 
Our Research Products 
Order Publications 
Multimedia 
Press Room 
Resources for Monitor Researchers 
ARCHIVES HOME PAGE 
    >
Email Notification Receive notifications when this Country Profile is updated.

Sections



Send us your feedback on this profile

Send the Monitor your feedback by filling out this form. Responses will be channeled to editors, but will not be available online. Click if you would like to send an attachment. If you are using webmail, send attachments to .

Afghanistan

Last Updated: 04 October 2010

Casualties and Victim Assistance

Casualties

Casualties in 2009

Casualties in 2009

859 (2008: 992)

Casualties by outcome

212 killed; 647 injured (2008: 266 killed; 726 injured)

Casualties by device type

29 antipersonnel mines; 20 antivehicle mines; 218 unknown mines; 3 unexploded submunitions; 292 ERW; 293 IEDs; and 4 unknown devices

For 2009, Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor identified at least 859 new casualties due to mines, explosive remnants of war (ERW), and victim-activated improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Afghanistan; this was a significant decrease (13%) from the 992 casualties identified for 2008.

The Mine Action Coordination Center of Afghanistan (MACCA) recorded 539 mine/ERW casualties (118 killed and 421 injured) for 2009 including 491 civilians,[1] 34 deminers, three off-duty military personnel, and 11 of unknown civilian/military status. Children (269) accounted for 55% of recorded civilian casualties (228 boys and 41 girls). Of the 270 adult casualties, 234 were men and 36 were women. One deminer was killed (a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina) and 33 were injured (all Afghan nationals) in 32 accidents.[2]

This represented a significant decrease from the 831 casualties MACCA recorded for 2008.[3] The reason for the steep decline in reported civilian casualties was not known. No changes in data collection in 2009 were known to account for the decrease.[4] As in previous years, MACCA data did not include IED casualties.[5]

Handicap International (HI) recorded 27 additional civilian casualties for 2009 (23 killed and four injured), including 19 children (16 boys and three girls).[6]

Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor analysis of United States military data made available through the Guardian newspaper identified 293 casualties of victim-activated IEDs (71 killed and 222 injured): 168 foreign military casualties (24 killed and 144 injured), 66 Afghan military casualties (18 killed and 48 injured), and 59 civilian casualties (29 killed and 30 injured) in 166 incidents.[7] For 2008, Landmine Monitor recorded 161 casualties (79 killed and 82 injured) identified through media analysis in addition to those reported by MACCA for 2008 including foreign soldiers and military deminers.[8]

Some 743 casualties of cluster munition remnants were recorded between 1980 and the end of 2009. In addition, at least 26 casualties during the use of cluster munitions have been recorded.[9]

MACCA recorded 20,095 casualties between 1979 and the end of 2009.[10]

Victim Assistance

The total number of survivors in Afghanistan is unknown but in 2006, was estimated to be 52,000–60,000.[11]

There was no comprehensive assessment of the needs of mine/ERW survivors in 2009. Needs assessments or surveys were carried out by individual national and international NGOs in the field and the results were shared with MACCA and relevant ministries. However, there was no centralized distribution of existing data on survivors’ needs.[12] The ICRC reported that in 2009, national casualty data collectors ceased gathering information on new casualties from ICRC-supported centers, as had been done regularly in past years. No external acquisition or crosschecking of their data was carried out.[13] ICRC centers continued to assess and register all survivors assisted.[14]

The Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs, Martyrs and Disabled (MoLSAMD) used MACCA data for planning activities. Reportedly, there was a need for a national disability and injury surveillance mechanism. The Ministry of Public Health’s (MoPH) Disability and Rehabilitation Department (DRD) was responsible for injury surveillance and needs assessment, but had no budget to implement a system.[15]

Victim assistance coordination[16]

Government coordinating body/ focal point

MoLSAMD was the focal point and primary coordinating agency

in the disability field, including victim assistance issues, with MACCA support and funding

Coordinating mechanism

MoLSAMD hosted the Disability Stakeholder Coordination Group; the MoPH, through the DRD, coordinated disability issues; MACCA provided financial support and its representatives worked in the key ministries; the Advocacy Committee for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, lead by Afghanistan Civil Society Forum Organization (ACSFO) provides a coordination mechanism for civil society organizations

Plan

ANDAP, based on Nairobi Action Plan principles

Disability Stakeholder Coordination Group meetings were held monthly in Kabul in 2009 and new groups were established in the northern and eastern regions of Afghanistan.[17] A wide range of relevant governmental and non-governmental actors attended the meetings, primarily to discuss their own activities and plans.[18] During 2009, representatives from disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) and survivor organizations noted that coordination with the ministries remained challenging.[19]

The Inter-ministerial Task Force on Disability was expected to “improve coordination between the different ministries.”[20] The MoPH DRD, with the support of task force members, drafted a rehabilitation policy which was under revision at the end of 2009.[21] No formal meetings of the task force were reported to the end of 2009 after the first meeting in October 2008.

In March 2009, a third national workshop was held to discuss the Afghanistan National Disability Action Plan 2008–2011 (ANDAP) and its implementation.[22] A proposed monitoring mechanism for ANDAP had not been approved by the end of 2009.[23] All implementing organizations were asked to apply ANDAP in their plans and services.[24] Some reported adhering to it, but no specific outcomes were reported for 2009.

Afghanistan provided information on progress and challenges for victim assistance in 2009 at the Second Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty in November–December 2009, at the meeting of the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration in June 2010, and a brief update in Form J of its Article 7 report.[25]

Relevant coordination meetings included representatives from survivors’ organizations and survivors were included in provision of victim assistance services through NGOs during 2009. Afghanistan’s delegation to the Second Review Conference included a survivor. Other survivors from Afghanistan also participated, representing their own organizations.[26] However, it was also reported that overall inclusion of survivors was inadequate, due in part to prejudices against persons with disabilities.[27]

Service accessibility and effectiveness

Victim assistance activities in 2009[28]

Name of organization

Type of organization

 

Type of activity

Changes in quality/coverage of service in 2009 (Afghan year 1388)

MoLSAMD

Government

Coordination/training

Improved coordination and training

MoPH

Government

Emergency and continuing medical care, surgery, awareness-raising, medication, counselling

Improved the quality of the services and expanded the geographic coverage of health services

Afghan Landmine Survivors’ Organization (ALSO)

National NGO

 

Peer support, literacy, vocational training, and advocacy

Opened a regional office in Mazar-e-Sharif, and increased the number of services and beneficiaries

 

Accessibility Organization for Afghan Disabled (AOAD)

National NGO

Community-based rehabilitation (CBR), accessibility, education, and economic inclusion

Increased the number of vocational training beneficiaries

Afghan Amputee Bicyclists for Rehabilitation and Recreation (AABRR)

National NGO

 

Physiotherapy, education and vocational training; sport and recreation

Increased vocational training activities

Community Center  for Disabled People (CCD)

National NGO

 

Social and economic inclusion and advocacy

No change

Development and Ability Organization (DAO)

National NGO

 

Social inclusion, advocacy, and income-generating projects

No change

Kabul Orthopedic Organization

National NGO

 

Physical rehabilitation and  vocational training, including for Ministry of Defense/military casualties

No change

The Physical Therapy Institute and International Medical Assistance

National NGO

& international NGO

Physical rehabilitation and physiotherapy three-year diploma training program

No change

Swedish Committee for Afghanistan (SAC)- Rehabilitation of Afghans with Disabilities program

International NGO

 

CBR, physical rehabilitation, psychosocial support, economic inclusion through revolving loans, inclusive education, advocacy, and capacity-building

Improved quality of services and expanded CBR services to new villages

Clear Path International (CPI)

International NGO

Provided sub-grants and technical assistance to six national NGOs implementing physical rehabilitation, psychological and peer support, school accessibility, and economic inclusion activities

Expanded in range of support and geographic coverage

HI

International NGO

Physical rehabilitation programs operated in Herat and Kandahar, with Kandahar concentrating on prosthetics and orthopedics; HI also supports the physiotherapy training curriculum

Improved their quality of services and decreased the coverage of their CBR program

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Support for Afghanistan

International NGO

Physical therapy, psychological support, and vocational training

No change

Serve

International NGO

Physical rehabilitation, economic rehabilitation, CBR, special and inclusive education

No change

ICRC

International organization

Emergency medical care; physical rehabilitation including physiotherapy, prosthetics, and other mobility devices; economic inclusion and social reintegration including education, vocational training, micro-finance, and employment for persons with disabilities

Significant increase in medical care; increased number patients assisted with physical rehabilitation by 6.5% and  decreased the number of prostheses provided for mine/ERW survivors by 8% from 2008; service quality improved through training and new technology; geographic coverage increased through a referral system in Bamyan, Daikundi, Helmand, Khost, and Uruzgan

There were many stakeholders in the victim assistance and disability sector.[29] MACCA was not aware of any that ceased their activities in 2009, as in 2008, or of any new organizations.[30] The deteriorating security situation severely affected the delivery of humanitarian services in a growing number of geographic areas and disproportionately impacted vulnerable individuals, including mine/ERW survivors.[31]

ICRC-supported hospitals assisted more than double the number of people injured by mines/ERW in 2009 as compared to 2008 (an increase of 133%).[32] However, Afghan Red Crescent Society first-aid volunteers and other community first-aid workers lacked the training to provide complex medical treatment. In response to the lack of local emergency capacity and the poor security situation, the ICRC evacuated war-injured persons to appropriate facilities through a system of private taxis.[33] No new emergency medical care training was reported to MACCA for 2009. Additional mobile medical teams were established to assist the nomadic Kochi people: 30 teams in 2009, from eight in 2008. Health staff in 15 of the mobile teams received training from the MoPH DRD in physical rehabilitation and disability awareness in order to better identify and assist beneficiaries with disabilities.[34]

No significant changes in physical rehabilitation, including prosthetics, were reported for 2009. The establishment of new peripheral prosthetic centers would have been needed to make significant improvements for survivors.[35] As of 2009, the MoPH’s Basic Package of Health Services included providing physiotherapists in 56 hospitals, including a male and female physiotherapist in each. However, the number of physiotherapists graduating annually was insufficient to fulfill this requirement.[36] By the end of 2009, there were still no physical rehabilitation services available in the southeastern region of Afghanistan. However, funding for equipment and running costs of the newly built Khost Orthopedic Workshop was approved by the Ministry of Finance in the fiscal year 2009 (Afghan year 1388) though the center was not yet operational.[37]

As in past years, no significant changes were reported in economic or social inclusion activities.[38] The lack of psychosocial support, particularly peer support, remained one of the largest gaps in the government-coordinated victim assistance and disability programs.[39] In 2009, training on the psychosocial aspects of disability was included in other awareness-raising training for MoPH staff.[40]

Differences in treatment in Afghanistan were often not based solely on needs, but were influenced by the economic and social situation of survivors as well as their gender and cause of disability. Women and elderly persons with disabilities received fewer services for these reasons.[41]

The constitution prohibits any kind of discrimination against citizens and requires the state to assist persons who have disabilities and to protect their rights, including healthcare and financial protection. The constitution also requires the state to adopt measures to reintegrate and to ensure the active participation in society of persons with disabilities.[42] There were no laws or concrete plans to ensure accessibility and this remained a significant challenge as persons with disabilities in Afghanistan lacked access to many existing services. In Kabul for example, some 95% of public buildings were not accessible for persons with disabilities including mine/ERW survivors.[43] The National Law for the Rights and Privileges of Persons with Disabilities, developed in 2006 and passed in 2008, was finally adopted in December 2009, but it was not yet enforceable pending its being published in the official gazette of the Ministry of Justice.[44]

As of 1 September 2010, Afghanistan had not signed the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.



[1] This number includes two boys and two girls of unknown civilian/military status.

[2] Email from MACCA, 10 August 2010.

[3] Casualty data provided by MACCA, Kabul, 26 May 2009.

[4] Email from MACCA, 3 August 2010.

[5] MACCA data did not include suicide bombings, command-detonated devices, and roadside bombs, however, other victim-activated devices that include landmines and abandoned IEDs were included. Emails from MACCA, 10 August 2010 and 17 August 2010.

[6] Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor analysis based on detailed comparison of datasets. These casualties were included in the annual total. This information may have differed from MACCA data due to the stringent MACCA verification process. Email from Awlia Mayar, Mine Action Technical Advisor, HI, 11 April 2010.

[7] These casualties were included in the annual total. Two incidents involved devices which may have been landmines. Data spreadsheet available from, “Afghanistan war logs,” The Guardian, 26 July 2010, www.guardian.co.uk.

[8] Landmine Monitor media monitoring between 1 January 2008 and 31 May 2009. See Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 103; and Landmine Monitor Report 2008, p. 90.

[9] Circle of Impact: The Fatal Footprint of Cluster Munitions on People and Communities (Brussels: HI, May 2007), p, 95. The ICRC recorded 707 casualties occurring during cluster munition use between 1980 and 31 December 2006 to which 36 casualties from 2007 to the end of 2009 recorded by MACCA were added. Due to under-reporting it is likely that the numbers of casualties during use as well as those caused by unexploded submunitions were significantly higher. Email from MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[10] Emails from MACCA, 24 June 2009 and 10 August 2010.

[11] HI, “Understanding the Challenge Ahead, National Disability Survey in Afghanistan,” Kabul, 2006.

[12] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010. CBR workers received training in needs assessment. Organizations sharing data included SCA, HI, DAO, AABRR, and CCD. AOAD also carried out its own needs assessments. AOAD, “Organizational Facts,” www.aoad-af.org.

[13] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, Head of Program, ICRC, 28 March 2010.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Interview with Suraya Paikan, Deputy Minister, MoLSAMD, in Geneva, 25 June 2010.

[16] Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2009), Form J; response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010; see Landmine Monitor Report 2009, p. 106; and email from Sulaiman Aminy, Director, ALSO, 2 September 2010.

[17] Statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 22 June 2010.

[18] Interview with Suraya Paikan, MoLSAMD, in Geneva, 25 June 2010.

[19] MoLSAMD Disability Support Unit, “Minutes of the DCG meeting,” Kabul, 8 October 2008; response to Monitor questionnaire by Omara Khan Muneeb, Director, DAO, 18 June 2009; and telephone interview with ALSO staff, 16 June 2009.

[20] Statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 22 June 2010.

[21] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[22] Statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 26 May 2009.

[23] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Statement of Afghanistan, Second Review Conference, Cartagena, 30 November 2009; statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-economic Reintegration, Geneva, 24 June 2010; and Article 7 Report (for calendar year 2009), Form J.

[26] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[27] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, ICRC, 28 March 2010.

[28] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010; HI, “Around the World: Afghanistan,” www.handicap-international.fr; CPI, “Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Office of Weapons Removal & Abatement (PM/WRA): Community-Based Physical & Socio-Economic Rehabilitation Program for ERW Accident Survivors & Persons with Disabilities in Afghanistan, Grant Number: 09-024, Summary: 2009”; response to Monitor questionnaire by Kristen Leadem, Country Director, CPI, 31 March 2010; AOAD, “Fact Sheet,” www.aoad-af.org; ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 206; ICRC, “Annual Report 2008,” Geneva, April 2009, p. 189; response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, ICRC, 28 March 2010; and email from Sulaiman Aminy, ALSO, 2 September 2010.

[29] MACCA recorded 10 national and 12 international NGOs providing various services.

[30] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 29 March 2009.

[31] UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), “Afghanistan Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2009,” UNAMA, Human Rights Unit, Kabul, January 2010, p. 1; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 206.

[32] In 2009, 1,011 mine/ERW survivors were assisted, up from 434 in 2008. ICRC, “Annual Report 2009,” Geneva, May 2010, p. 206; and ICRC, “Annual Report 2008,” Geneva, April 2009, p. 189.

[33] ICRC, “Afghanistan: assistance to the war-wounded,” 8 April 2009, www.icrc.org.

[34] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[35] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, ICRC, 28 March 2010.

[36] Statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 22 June 2010.

[37] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010; and Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief, “Job Announcements,” 29 June 2010, www.acbar.org. A MoPH DRD project, the Khost Center, was built by the Provincial Reconstruction Team Khost (PRT) at the request of the MoPH and MoLSAMD.

[38] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, ICRC, 28 March 2010; and response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[39] ALSO, “Conference on Peer Support and Physical Accessibility in Kabul 1st August 2010–3 Aug 2010,” www.afghanlandminesurvivors.org.

[40] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010.

[41] Response to Monitor questionnaire by Alberto Cairo, ICRC, 28 March 2010.

[42] US Department of State, “2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Afghanistan,” Washington, DC, 11 March 2010.

[43] ALSO, “Conference on Peer Support and Physical Accessibility in Kabul 1st August–2010, 3 Aug 2010,” www.afghanlandminesurvivors.org.

[44] Response to Monitor questionnaire by MACCA, 18 February 2010; statement of Afghanistan, Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration, Geneva, 26 May 2009; and statement of Afghanistan, Ninth Meeting of States Parties, Geneva, 27 November 2008.